- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Journal of Computing in Higher Education
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Preparing the next generation of instructional
designers: a cross-institution faculty collaboration
Patricia J. Slagter van Tryon
1
•Jason McDonald
2
•Atsusi Hirumi
3
Published online: 20 January 2018
Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018
Abstract The ability of novice instructional designers to become skilled problem-
solvers, who select and apply appropriate instructional design (ID) models in their
work environments, are key competencies generally sought after in introductory ID
courses. Yet, the proliferation of ID models, coupled with varied philosophies and
practices about how ID is taught may pose challenges for ID educators seeking to
prepare the next generation of leaders in the field. With little empirical research or
documented best practices, ID educators are left to their own judgment about to how
to navigate the practical challenges that can arise in the pursuit of their teaching
goals. This paper shares insights on how ID educators across institutions teach
introductory ID under varied conditions, and how ID educators can support each
other in addressing challenges faced by those teaching introductory ID and seeking
to improve their own practice. Using action research methods, we engaged in cross-
institutional collaboration, sharing teaching approaches, philosophies, modes of
delivery, instructional strategies, resources, models, and products of instructional
design with each other as a means to understand and improve our own teaching
practices. We also developed a model for cross-institutional faculty collaboration
that is immersive, cyclical, and theory-based, and provides a guide for other ID
&Patricia J. Slagter van Tryon
slagtervantryonp@ecu.edu
Jason McDonald
Jason@byu.edu
Atsusi Hirumi
atsusi.hirumi@ucf.edu
1
Department of Mathematics Science, and Instructional Technology Education, East Carolina
University, Greenville, NC, USA
2
Department of Instructional Psychology and Technology, Brigham Young University, Provo,
UT, USA
3
Instructional Design and Technology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
123
J Comput High Educ (2018) 30:125–153
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9167-3
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.