ArticlePDF Available

Efficacy of Removable Partial Denture Treatment: A Retrospective Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Evaluation

Authors:
  • Independent Researcher

Abstract and Figures

Methods: Participants provided with RPDs were invited to complete OHIP-20 at least 4 weeks after dentures were fitted. Clinical records were retrieved to identify a number of independent variables. Variables meeting a standard of statistical significance were included into regression analysis to quantify influence on OHIP-20 scores. Results: 84 patients agreed to participate. No. of missing teeth, age, gender, replacement of anterior teeth and framework material were entered into the model, which was statistically significant, p⟨0.001, with pseudo R² of 0.39. Significant variables were age (p⟨0.05), no. of missing teeth (p⟨0.01), gender (p⟨0.05) and replacement of anterior teeth (p⟨0.001). Replacing anterior teeth showed 9.68 point reduction in OHIP-20 score in patients with replaced anterior teeth. Discussion: Replacing anterior teeth was associated better post-operative OHRQoL outcomes, suggesting RPDs address impacts on OHRQoL of missing anterior teeth. Success of RPDs in overcoming impacts of tooth loss on OHRQoL was worse as more teeth were lost.
Content may be subject to copyright.
European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2017) 25, 1–7
ejprd.org - Published by Dennis Barber Journals. Copyright ©2017 by Dennis Barber Ltd. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• EJPRD
Efficacy of Removable
Partial Denture Treatment:
A Retrospective Oral Health-
Related Quality of Life
Evaluation
ABSTRACT
Successful removable partial dentures (RPDs) use may be influenced by patient and den-
ture variables including age, denture experience and number or position of teeth being re-
placed. Influence of patient and denture variables on OHRQoL with RPDs was investigated
using ordinal logistic regression analysis. Methods: Participants provided with RPDs were
invited to complete OHIP-20 at least 4 weeks after dentures were fitted. Clinical records
were retrieved to identify a number of independent variables. Variables meeting a standard
of statistical significance were included into regression analysis to quantify influence on
OHIP-20 scores. Results: 84 patients agreed to participate. No. of missing teeth, age, gen-
der, replacement of anterior teeth and framework material were entered into the model,
which was statistically significant, p<0.001, with pseudo R2 of 0.39. Significant variables
were age (p<0.05), no. of missing teeth (p<0.01), gender (p<0.05) and replacement of an-
terior teeth (p<0.001). Replacing anterior teeth showed 9.68 point reduction in OHIP-20
score in patients with replaced anterior teeth. Discussion: Replacing anterior teeth was as-
sociated better post-operative OHRQoL outcomes, suggesting RPDs address impacts on
OHRQoL of missing anterior teeth. Success of RPDs in overcoming impacts of tooth loss
on OHRQoL was worse as more teeth were lost.
INTRODUCTION
The success of removable partial dentures (RPDs), both at an individual
and societal level, is variable and dicult to measure.1 Patient satisfaction
with removable partial dentures can be rather variable, though studies
indicate a majority of patients expressing satisfaction, signicant numbers
do report dissatisfaction and avoidance of wearing an RPD.2,3 Both patient
and denture variables may be strong determinants of success. Examina-
tion of the relationship of denture quality to patient satisfaction has dem-
onstrated some patients nd RPDs that are t for purpose clinically di-
cult to tolerate, whilst others may nd dentures satisfactory on a personal
level, whilst clinically they may be considered sub-optimal, and no particu-
lar ‘standards’ of removable partial denture construction are related to
patient satisfaction.4 The interplay between patient variables and denture
variables may have a role to play on changes to oral health-related quality
of life (OHRQoL); with some variables being more inuential on success
than others. It is not known which variables are most important, across
Keywords
Removable Partial Denture
Oral Health Related Quality Of Life
Partially Edentulous
Person-Centered Outcomes
Authors
Zaid Ali *
(PostNominalLetters)
Prof. Sarah Baker §
(PostNominalLetters)
poyan Barabari §
(PostNominalLetters)
Prof. Nicolas Martin §
(PostNominalLetters)
Address for Correspondence
Zaid Ali *
Email: ali.zaid283@gmail.com
* University of Sheeld, Charles Cliord Dental
Hospital
§
University of Sheeld
Received: 02.02.2017
Accepted: 03.02.2017
doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_01669Ali07
ejprd.org - Published by Dennis Barber Journals. Copyright ©2017 by Dennis Barber Ltd. All rights reserved.
European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2017) 25 ARTICLE IN PRESS
••••••••••• Ecacy of Removable Partial Denture Treatment: A Retrospective Oral Health-Related...
the population of partially dentate patients requiring RPDs,
though it has been reported that patients are more likely to
wear an RPD if it replaces missing anterior teeth.2 The num-
ber of variables to consider is signicant with patient variables
including psychological acceptance, adaptation capacity, oral
and dental status.4,5 Denture variables include the number,
position and size of edentate saddles and variables associ-
ated with the design and manufacturing of the prostheses, in-
cluding the type of materials, derivation of support, numbers
of teeth used for support etc.6 The relative impact of these
denture and patient variables on success with RPDs has been
measured using measures of success such as continued den-
ture use and measures of satisfaction, but not using objective,
validated measures of OHRQoL as the outcome measure.2,4,6,7
A number of specic objective markers of success for the
assessment of RPDs have been developed, that include meas-
ures of masticatory eciency, patient satisfaction, continued
use of prostheses and subjective assessment against various
success criteria judged by specialists in the eld.2,4,6,7 Studies
using these have considered the relative effects of patient and
denture variables on success measured against these surro-
gate markers. In this respect, denture success, as a measure
of patient and denture variables, have been studied retro-
spectively in several studies, which have looked at continued
use of the denture and clinical acceptability.6-8 None, however,
have fully explored the effect of these variables on OHRQoL in
RPD wearers. OHRQoL seeks to evaluate the physical, psycho-
logical, and social impact of oral conditions on an individual.9
This has been described by Locker in 1988 as a construct used
to quantify the positive and negative effects of oral symptoms
on patient’s quality of life.10 The effects on this construct can
be measured through Patient Reported Outcome Measures
(PROMs) that have been specically developed and validat-
ed. Validated PROMs offer a reliable means of quantifying
OHRQoL such that differences between patient and denture
variables may be quantied and their inuence on outcome
compared. Ultimately, as the purpose of providing a RPD is
to restore function and aesthetics to overcome the impact of
tooth loss.11 Rehabilitation with a removable partial denture
has been shown to improve an individual’s quality of life and it
is by overcoming the impairment of tooth loss, restoring func-
tional ability and thereby reducing the consequent disability,
that improvements in OHRQol are made and it is therefore
logical to focus on outcome measures such as OHRQoL.12 The
choice of measure is an important one and should be consid-
ered in the context of the purpose of analysis, the population
being studied and the audience being asked to interpret the
results.13 In this case, a tool designed and validated for use in
partially dentate patients, used in the context of measuring
OHRQoL over periods of follow-up anticipated in this cohort
of patients, with items that would be expected to have im-
pacts in denture wearers would be considered to be an ap-
propriate tool and a representative measure of success from
a patient perspective.13
Disease specic measure of OHRQoL such as the Oral Health
Impact Prole, have been validated to evaluate the range
of domains that describe OHRQoL. The OHIP-20, a 20-item
subscale of the original OHIP-49 has been validated for the
measurement of OHRQoL in patients with xed and remov-
able prostheses.14 Studies that have measured success with
RPDs have identied that factors such as the type of support
derived for the denture, the framework material, whether
or not the denture replaced anterior teeth etc., play a role
in the patient’s experience with and continued use of RPDs.2
Mandibular Kennedy Class 1 dentures, i.e. those replacing
posterior teeth in bilateral free-end saddles, were often not
worn and patients with a shortened dental arch are reported
to only perceive benets of an RPD when anterior teeth are
being replaced.6,15 Neither of these studies however has in-
vestigated the relative impact of these important patient and
denture variables on a validated measure of OHRQoL such as
the OHIP.
The concept of minimum clinically important differences
(MCID) in OHRQoL is another important feature of PROMs;
dened as the smallest change in an outcome that a patient
would identify as important.16 The calculation of the MCID has
been reported by Allen
et al
. that investigated the MCID for
the OHIP-20 using the anchor-based method and determined
that a MCID for the OHIP-20 was 7 to 8 point scores.12,16
Patient and denture variables are not the only factors likely
to modify OHRQoL. Scores from PROMs may be modied by a
person’s characteristics, their social status, family and cultural
circumstances, and of course by their experience of disease
whether due to environmental (e.g. caries) or genetic causes
(e.g. congenital absence of teeth); both in terms of extent and
severity.8 It would not be feasible for clinicians to take account
of all these variables in an attempt to predict a successful out-
come with RPDs. However, there are a number of variables
which can be considered and, if their relative effects could be
quantied, could help clinicians predict which cases are more
or less likely than others to be perceived by patients as suc-
cessful.
Given that both patient and denture variables play a role in
the success outcomes, it is appropriate to undertake a study
that seeks to control some of these parameters and in this
way obtain data that is more representative of the wearing of
a denture that is ‘t for purpose’. In particular, it is the process
of denture fabrication that can be a signicant confounder in
this type of study given the high levels of quality variability as-
sociated with both the clinical and technological aspects (de-
sign and manufacturing) of denture fabrication.17,18 The levels
of scrutiny to each aspect of treatment planning and denture
design and fabrication at a Dental Teaching Hospital provides
a setting with a carefully controlled production process with
strong quality assurance protocols used for all clinical and
technological stages of denture production.
P2
ejprd.org - Published by Dennis Barber Journals. Copyright ©2017 by Dennis Barber Ltd. All rights reserved.
European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2017) 25
ARTICLE IN PRESS
••••••••••• Ecacy of Removable Partial Denture Treatment: A Retrospective Oral Health-Related... •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
EJPRD
The aim of this retrospective evaluation was to explore the
impact of various independent patient and denture variables
associated with the provision of RPD treatment on OHRQoL
outcomes and to test the construct validity of our chosen per-
son centered outcome measure, the OHIP-20, in the context
of RPD provision in a dental teaching hospital.
METHODS
Patients provided with an RPD from the 1st April 2014 un-
til the 1st December 2014, were identied from an electronic
database kept at the Removable Prosthodontic Laboratory
at a large UK Dental Hospital. These patients were contacted
by mailshot, which included a participant information leaet,
a questionnaire including the OHIP-20 as well as questions
concerning continued use of the RPD and a free-text box for
additional comments. The OHIP-20 is a 20-item questionnaire
measured on a 5-point Likert scale, scoring from never (0,
least impact) to very often (4, greatest impact), giving a range
of total score from 0 to 80 points. Questionnaires were indi-
vidually coded and a stamped addressed envelope was en-
closed for return of the questionnaires. Three questionnaires
were sent to participants and returns were accepted within a
4-month period between 5th January and 1st May 2015.
The following patient and denture variables were recoded
from clinical and laboratory records for those patients who
returned completed questionnaires: age, gender, number of
missing teeth (excluding third molars), denture congura-
tion (complete denture against partial denture, partial den-
ture against partial denture, partial denture against dentate
arch), type of framework support material (tooth-and-mucosa
supported Cobalt-Chromium RPDs only, mucosa supported
acrylic dentures only, combined, i.e. each arch restored with
a different style), replacement of anterior teeth, presence of a
free-end saddle, patient experience of denture wearing.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The Kolmogrov-Smirnov test was used to investigate normality
of the outcome data and due to the skewed nature of the OHIP-
20 total score, non-parametric tests were used in the analysis.
Independent variables were investigated to determine if they
could be entered into a multi-variate regression analysis. Corre-
lations between OHIP-20 and skewed variables, namely, number
of missing teeth and age, were measured using Kendal’s tau cor-
relation coecient. Binary categorical variables: gender, previ-
ous denture usage, replacement of anterior teeth and presence
of a free-end saddle were analysed using a Mann Whitney U test.
Nominal variables for denture conguration and framework
materials used were tested using a Kruskal Wallis ANOVA. The
threshold for inclusion in the model was be set at p<0.219. For
each variable a minimum of 10 responses were be required as
a sucient sample to undertake multi-variate regression analy-
sis, therefore on the assumption that all variables are included
into the multivariate linear regression model a minimum of 100
responses would be required.
19
Due to the skewed nature of the
OHIP-20 total score this was transformed on a log
10
scale before
regression analysis. A pseudo R2 was calculated by entering vari-
ables that met the threshold for inclusion into an ordinal logistic
regression analysis.
Internal consistency of the OHIP-20 scale was investigated us-
ing a Cronbach’s alpha statistic. External validity was investigated
by investigating the relationship between the OHIP-20 score and
the continued use of the RPD provided, a commonly reported
positive predictor of a successful outcome with RPDs.
RESULTS
One hundred and twenty patients were identied from the
dental laboratory database and were sent questionnaires. All
patients had worn their dentures for a minimum of 4 weeks in
line with previous studies measuring effects of RPD treatment on
OHRQoL. Eighty-four completed questionnaires were collected
representing a response rate of 70%. Questionnaires of those
patients who responded were complete and there was therefore
no missing outcome data.
Descriptive data for patient and denture variables of those pa-
tients who returned completed questionnaires are presented in
Table 1. Ages ranged from 26 to 93 years, though the mean was
skewed towards older patients at 65.8 years (SD = 13.4 years).
There were 12% more male responses than females. Three quar-
ters of participants had already had experience of denture wear.
Most RPDs, 64%, were made using a tooth-and-mucosa support-
ed cobalt chromium framework, with only 27% being acrylic mu-
cosa borne RPDs. 8% of participants received a chrome denture
in one arch and an acrylic denture in the opposing arch.
Internal consistency of OHIP-20 was measured using a Cron-
bach’s alpha statistic. Including all items of the OHIP-20 gave an
alpha statistic of 0.97. The Cronbach’s alpha was also measured
for the scale if each item was removed and did not show a sig-
nicant reduction upon removal of any one of the scale items,
which indicates excellent internal consistency of the scale used.
Patients who were still using their dentures had median OHIP-20
scores of 18 compared to 27 for those wearing only one of the
dentures provided and 46 for patients not wearing any dentures
provided. This difference was not statistically signicant p=0.098.
Only three patients were not wearing either dentures provided
representing a failure rate of 3.6%. 70 patients were wearing all
of the dentures provided representing total success in 83.33%,
the remaining 11 patients, 13.1%, were provided with two den-
tures but only wore one of them.
Kilmogorov-Smirnov test for normality of the OHIP-20 score
conrmed a non-normal distribution (p<0.001), which is not unu-
sual when using quality of life measures.
Kendal’s tau correlation coecient for OHIP-20 against miss-
ing teeth and age are shown in Table 2. Gender, previous den-
ture usage, replacement of anterior teeth and presence of a
free-end saddle were analysed using a Mann Whitney U test.
Denture conguration and framework materials used were
tested using a Kruskal Wallis ANOVA. Table 2 also shows the
median OHIP-20 scores for each of these groups with the re-
spective p-values for differences between groups.
P3
ejprd.org - Published by Dennis Barber Journals. Copyright ©2017 by Dennis Barber Ltd. All rights reserved.
European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2017) 25 ARTICLE IN PRESS
••••••••••• Ecacy of Removable Partial Denture Treatment: A Retrospective Oral Health-Related...
The variables which were signicant to include in the regres-
sion were number of missing teeth, age, gender, replacement
of anterior teeth and framework material. Ordinal logistic
regression analysis (OHIP-20 score as the outcome) was per-
formed to test the model and was found to be statistically sig-
nicant, p<0.001, with a pseudo R2 of 0.39. Independent vari-
ables within the model were age (p<0.05), number of missing
teeth (p<0.01), gender (p<0.05) and whether anterior teeth
were replaced (p<0.001). Ordered log odds regression coe-
cients were transformed using the exponential to arrive at re-
gression coecients for statistically signicant variables. For
age the co-ecient was 0.97 (this relationship was negative),
for gender it was 2.45, for missing teeth the co-ecient was
1.10 and for replacement of anterior teeth the co-ecient was
9.68. Figure 1 shows a box and whisker plot of OHIP-20 total
score against whether anterior teeth were replaced or not.
1. Figures
Figure 1 Box and whisker plot representing median, inter-quartile range
and range for OHIP-20 total score, according to whether anterior
teeth were replaced or not.
Figure 1: Box and whisker plot representing median, inter-
quartile range and range for OHIP-20 total score, according to
whether anterior teeth were replaced or not.
Table 1. Descriptive data for patient and denture variables
n = Range Mean S.D.
Age (years) 26 – 93 66 13
Gender
Female 37 (44%)
Male 47 (56%)
No. missing teeth (excluding 3rd molars) 3 – 23 13 6
No. missing teeth in mandible 2 - 16 8 3
No. missing teeth in maxilla 2 - 16 9 4
Previously wore a denture?
No 21 (25%)
Yes 63 (75%)
Denture conguration
RPD vs RPD 39 (46%)
Complete denture vs RPD 16 (19%)
RPD vs Dentate/Fixed 29 (35%)
Framework material
Acrylic 23 (27%)
Chrome 54 (64%)
Both 7 (8%)
Replacement of anterior
teeth by removable denture
No 28 (33%)
Yes 56 (67%)
Free end saddle
No 23 (27%)
Yes 61 (73%)
P4
ejprd.org - Published by Dennis Barber Journals. Copyright ©2017 by Dennis Barber Ltd. All rights reserved.
European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2017) 25
ARTICLE IN PRESS
••••••••••• Ecacy of Removable Partial Denture Treatment: A Retrospective Oral Health-Related... •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
EJPRD
DISCUSSION
This was the rst evaluation of the inuence of patient and den-
ture variables on success of RPDs in the rehabilitation of tooth
loss as measured by OHRQoL. Previous studies have measured
the inuence of patient and denture variables on the success in
terms of continued denture usage and patient satisfaction.
2,20
The
data provides additional evidence that the use of OHIP-20 is a valid
measure for the construct of OHRQoL in partially dentate patients.
Internal consistency of the OHIP-20 was found to be excellent.
The Cronbach’s alpha remained strong even when items were re-
moved. External validity was good with higher OHIP-20 total score
in patients who continued to wear their dentures. Response rate
was excellent considering the use of postal questionnaires.
The most signicant variable having an effect on OHRQoL
was that of whether anterior teeth were being replaced by
the prostheses. This was negatively correlated with OHIP-20
score, which suggests that where anterior teeth are replaced,
the OHIP-20 score is reduced, i.e. there is better OHRQoL.
Where anterior teeth were replaced patients had a 33-point
improved median OHIP-20 score. There are several possible
reasons for this. Firstly, where anterior teeth are being re-
placed in a partial denture, it is quite likely that on each side
of the missing teeth space, there will be natural teeth to sup-
port the prosthesis and give greater stability and retention of
the denture by means of clasping arms and supporting rests.
Secondly, where patients have missing anterior teeth, it is
likely that these spaces are visible to other people, which the
patient in question may be particularly conscious of in their
interactions socially and intimately. It is understandable that
these impacts would be improved by the provision of pros-
theses.
The second important variable was found to be the number
of missing teeth, which was positively correlated such that, as
number of missing teeth increases so does the OHIP-20 score.
It is understandable that as the number of teeth increases the
number and degree of impacts on OHRQoL will increase. It
is worth noting that whilst one additional missing tooth only
changes OHIP-20 scores by 1.1 points, a loss of six or seven
teeth would have a magnitude of impact of the order asso-
ciated with a clinically meaningful difference to patients, the
MCID (minimum clinically important difference).
Age and gender were also signicantly related to the OHIP-20
score with females demonstrating a reduced OHRQoL meas-
ured by 2.45 points on the OHIP-20 scale. Whilst this is statis-
tically signicant it would not meet the threshold for clinical
meaningfulness to a patient measured by the MCID. Age on
the other hand was found to be related to OHRQoL, with an
increase in OHRQoL, measured as a reduction by 0.97 OHIP-
20 points for each additional year. As such we may argue that
every seven to eight additional years of life improves OHRQoL
by the MCID, a phenomenon, which is dicult to explain from
this study. Social handicap is an important domain measured
by the OHIP, which may in some part describe this interest-
ing nding. Social handicap is be shaped by the individual’s
expectations, which, as with all components of quality of life,
is informed by the “individual’s perceptions of their position
in life in the context of culture and value systems… in rela-
tion to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns”.13,21
Could it be the case that as patients age their expectations
and standards change in respect of social-life, and perhaps
even in respect to other domains such as functional status?
Previous literature, however, does shed some light on this
with Steele
et al
. comparing samples from the UK Adult Den-
tal Health Survey 1998 with the Australian National Dental
Telephone Interview Survey of 1999, using the OHIP-14 as a
measure of OHRQoL, found the ‘impact of oral health prob-
lems reduces with age’, p<0.00122. This phenomenon has
been demonstrated in other studies22-25. It is suggested that
the lower impacts on older persons may not be entirely age-
related per se, but rather that effects are ‘cohort dependent’.
Table 2. Denture and patient-related variables and OHRQoL
Variable Group
Median
OHIP-20
score
p-value
Gender
Male 16
0.18*
Female 24
Previous
Denture Usage
Yes 19
0.43
No 26
Replacement
of Anterior
Teeth
Yes 14
<0.001*
No 47
Presence of
a Free-end
Saddle
Yes 20
0.64
No 18
Framework
material
Chrome Only 19
0.15*Acrylic Only 34
Both 12
Denture
conguration
RPD vs RPD 21
0.91
RPD vs CD 20
RPD vs
Dentate 20
Variable Correlation
coecient p-value
Age - 0.11 0.15*
Total number of missing
teeth (excluding
third molars)
0.18 <0.05*
* Indicates p values deemed appropriate for inclusion in multi-
variate linear regression analysis
P5
ejprd.org - Published by Dennis Barber Journals. Copyright ©2017 by Dennis Barber Ltd. All rights reserved.
European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2017) 25 ARTICLE IN PRESS
••••••••••• Ecacy of Removable Partial Denture Treatment: A Retrospective Oral Health-Related...
That is to say that patients in older age groups age socially
different to persons in younger age groups and their levels
of health-expectations set at a different threshold, and that
these relationships may change as people in older age brack-
ets approach expectations to healthcare with different expec-
tations in the future.22,23
Patients who were still using their dentures had median
OHIP-20 scores of 18 points compared to 27 points for those
wearing only one of the dentures provided and 46 for patients
not wearing any dentures provided, giving a correlation coe-
cient of ρ = 0.182. This co-ecient was not statistically signi-
cant, p = 0.098, however, with only three patients not wearing
any of the dentures provided there were too few to make a
reliable comparison.
Participants in this study have been selected from a data-
base of patients treated in a teaching dental hospital with
strong clinical and technological quality assured protocols
and processes. This reduces the potential impact of the vari-
ability in quality of denture fabrication and enables the study
to focus on the patients’ true denture wearing experience
with the knowledge that all dentures were t for purpose. The
participating patients ranged from varying degrees of clinical
complexity, as they included those managed and treated on
undergraduate, postgraduate and specialist clinics, in accord-
ance with their needs and expectations. Participants included
in this study may therefore be considered to be representa-
tive of the population in general as they are likely to include
patients at all levels of complexity. In this sense, we can con-
sider that this retrospective evaluation is testing the ecacy
of RPDs as we have carefully controlled a signicant variable
and potential confounder; the quality of the RPD. The use of
postal questionnaires, however, may have introduced selec-
tion bias, excluding some participants who had barriers to
completion and returning these forms.
Clearly the retrospective nature of this study has limitations.
It was not possible to measure the magnitude of change is
OHRQoL in the absence of a pre-treatment score. Indeed
change scores would be just as useful in evaluation of OHRQoL
impacts of RPD treatment, it could be argued more useful as
indeed it is the change score which is of greatest value in de-
termining the extent of impact therapy had had on OHRQoL.
Of interest further still would be the impact of follow-up in
terms of response shift representing either greater adapta-
tion to the removable prosthesis or perhaps gradual return
of the negative impacts of tooth loss as the RPDs age. The
current evaluation allows for the assessment of OHRQoL at a
particular time-point after treatment and whilst this does not
provide information about the change score it does enable an
assessment to be made of the impact, which various patient
and denture variables have on OHRQoL in patients recently
provided with RPDs.
Prospective evaluation would also allow standardisation of
follow-up appointments. With the range of follow-up found
in this study of anywhere between one and seven months, a
further limitation of this retrospective evaluation was in the
control over follow-up, potentially an important confound-
ing variable. A similarly designed prospective study, control-
ling for the follow-up period as well as measuring the change
score, would provide greater information about the impact of
patient and denture variables on change in OHRQoL as well
as giving greater control of potential bias introduced by phe-
nomena such as response shift.
The types of dentures provided may have been different
within a dental teaching hospital compared to the provision
more generally. In this study 64.3% were provided with only
chrome dentures and 8.3% were provided with a mixture of
chrome and acrylic dentures in each arch. The provision of
laboratory work in primary care incurs a cost directly to the
prescribing practitioner and the prescription of more costly
chrome framework dentures in the general population is un-
likely to be represented by the percentages demonstrated
here. Furthermore the dentures provided in Dental Teaching
Hospitals are subject to several levels of scrutiny, which helps
to ensure a high level of care and attention. In this respect
this evaluation is one made on dentures provided within a
controlled environment to enhance the ecacy of RPD provi-
sion. Whether this can be translated to the effectiveness of
RPD provision in a more general sense is uncertain. To further
improve the generalizability of the study and consider the de-
gree of benecial effect of RPD provision under ‘real world’
conditions, and hence test the effectiveness of the interven-
tion, it would be appropriate to conduct the study in multiple
settings, including primary, secondary care and dental teach-
ing hospitals or other care settings.
With regards to the functional limitations caused by missing
anterior teeth, it is likely to be more dicult, where anterior
teeth are missing, to function with either no dentures or an
ill-tting and unstable prosthesis and so items concerned with
food catching or diculty chewing would be affected in such
patients, as well as avoidance of some foods or unsatisfac-
tory diets.26 Where anterior teeth are all present it is less likely
that a patient will have diculty incising into foods and may
even have learnt to undertake other masticatory functions
using anterior teeth, furthermore the masticatory eciency
may be inuenced by aesthetics.3,27,28 The work of Kayser
et al
demonstrates that where anterior teeth are present, though
there are missing occlusal units, social functions related to
aesthetics and phonetics were given greater importance by
patients.5,28
In conclusion, this retrospective cohort study investigating
the factors impacting on one to seven month post-treatment
OHRQoL outcomes in patients provided with RPDs for the re-
placement of missing teeth, has shown that:
Replacement of anterior teeth is associated with improved
OHRQoL outcomes. The clinical signicance of this effect is
over the level of minimal clinically important difference.
P6
ejprd.org - Published by Dennis Barber Journals. Copyright ©2017 by Dennis Barber Ltd. All rights reserved.
European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2017) 25
ARTICLE IN PRESS
••••••••••• Ecacy of Removable Partial Denture Treatment: A Retrospective Oral Health-Related... •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
EJPRD
OHRQoL is lower as more teeth are lost and as such clini-
cians should be mindful of the cumulative effect of tooth loss
on OHRQoL impacts for patients. The loss of six to seven ad-
ditional teeth demonstrates a clinically meaningful reduction
in OHRQoL.
Increased age is associated with a reduced impact of oral
diseases on OHRQoL and this had a clinically meaningful dif-
ference for every seven to eight additional years of age.
Validity of measuring OHRQoL using the OHIP-20 scale in re-
movable prosthodontics outcome research has been further
supported as it has demonstrated excellent internal consist-
ency and correlation with other variables denoting patient-
perceived success.
RPDs provided in an environment with strong clinical and
technological quality assured protocols and processes dem-
onstrate high levels of success with 96.4% continued use of
RPDs during the follow-up period.
REFERENCES
1. Wagner B, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures 10
years after insertion: success rates, hygienic problems and technical
failures.
Clin Oral Investig
2000 June;4(2):74-80.
2. Jepson NJ, Thomason JM, Steele JG. The inuence of denture design
on patient acceptance of partial dentures.
Br Dent J
1995;178:296-300.
3. Frank RP, Milgrom P, Leroux BG & Hawkins NR. Treatment outcomes
with mandibular removable partial dentures: a population-based
study of patient satisfaction.
J Prosthet Dent
1998;80:36-45.
4. Frank RP, Brudvik JS, Leroux B, Milgrom P, Hawkins N. Relationship
between the standards of removable partial denture construction,
clinical acceptability, and patient satisfaction.
J Prosthet Dent
2000;83:
521-7.
5. Fish SF. Adaptation and habituation to full dentures.
Br Dent J
.
1969;127(1):19-26.
6. Vanzeveren C, Hoore WD, Bercy P, Leloup G. Treatment with remov-
able partial dentures: a longitudinal study. Part 1.
J Oral Rehab
2003;
30:447-458.
7. Jones JA, Orner MB, Spiro A, Kressin NR. Tooth loss and dentures: pa-
tients’ perspectives.
Int Dent J
2003;53(5 Suppl): 327-34.
8. Sischo L, Border HL. Oral Health-related Quality of Life: What, Why,
How and Future Implications.
J Dent Res
2011;90(11):1264-1270.
9. Bennadi D, Reddy CVK. Oral health related quality of life.
J Int Soc Pre-
ventive & Community Dent
. 2013;3(1):1-6
10. Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework.
Community
Dent Health
1988;5:3-18.
11. Davenport JC, Basker RM, Heath JR, Ralph JP, Glantz PO. The removable
partial denture equation.
Br Dent J
. 2000;189(8):414-24.
12. Allen PF, O’Sullivan M, Locker D. Determining the minimally important
difference for the Oral Health Impact Prole-20.
Eur J Oral Sci
2009;
117(2):129-134.
13. Robinson PG. Choosing a measure of Health Related Quality of Life.
Community Dent Health
. 2016;33(2):107-15.
14. Allen PF & Locker D. A modied short version of the oral health impact
prole for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults.
Int J Prosthodont
2002;15:446-50.
15. Armellini DB, Heydecke G, Witter DJ & Creugers NH. Effect of remov-
able partial dentures on oral health-related quality of life in subjects
with shortened dental arches: a 2-center cross-sectional study.
Int J
Prosthodont
2008;21:524-30.
16. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: Ascer-
taining the minimal clinically important difference.
Control Clin Trial
1989;10:407-415.
17. Lynch CD, Allen PF. Quality of materials supplied to dental laboratories
for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in
Ireland.
Europ J Prosthodont Rest Dent
2003;11:176-180.
18. Lynch CD, Allen PF. Quality of written prescriptions and master impres-
sion for xed and removable prosthodontics: a comparative study.
Br
Dent J
2005;198:17-20.
19. Petrie A, Bulman JS, Osborn JF. Further statistics in dentistry Part 6:
Multiple linear regression.
Br Dent J
2002;193:675-682.
20. Zlataric DK, Celebic A. Factors related to patients’ general satisfaction
with removable partial dentures: a stepwise multiple regression analy-
sis.
Int J Prosthodont
. 2008;21(1):86-8.
21. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL):
position paper from the World Health Organization.
Soc Sci Med
.
1995;41(10):1403-9.
22. Steele JG, Sanders AE, Slade GD, Allen PF, Lahti S, Nuttall N, Spencer
AJ. How do age and tooth loss affect oral health impacts and quality of
life? A study comparing two national samples.
Community Dent Oral
Epidemiol
2004;32(2):107-114.
23. Robinson PG, Gibson BG, Khan FA, Birnbaum W. Validity of two oral
health-related quality of life measures.
Community Dent Oral Epide-
miol
2003;31(2):90-99.
24. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact
prole.
Community Dent Oral Epidem,
1997;25(8):284-290.
25. Slade GD. Assessing change in quality of life using the oral health im-
pact prole.
Community Dent Oral Epidem
, 1998;26:52-61.
26. Al-Omri MK, Karasneh JA, Lynch E, Lamey PJ, Clifford, TJ. Impacts of
missing upper anterior teeth on daily living.
Int Dent J
, 2009;59:127-32.
27. Omar SM, McEwen JD, Ogston SA. A test for occlusal function. The val-
ue of a masticatory eciency test in the assessment of occlusal func-
tion.
Br J Orthod
, 1987;14:85-90.
28. Kayser AF. How much reduction of the dental arch is functionally ac-
ceptable for the ageing patient?
Int Dent J
, 1990;40:183-8.
P7
... Continued) quality of life.71,72 Moreover, the long-term success of prosthodontic treatment is heavily reliant on the functional efficacy of the prosthesis and the survival of abutment teeth.73,74 Pooled survival rate data revealed a 5-year survival of 95.1% for cast-clasp RPDs and 91.7% for RPDs retained by telescopic crowns, with no significant difference between the 2 treatments (P=.71). ...
... While the prevalence of edentulism in industrialised nations is expected to decline and be centred among the older population, there is a projected increase in the number of individuals with partial tooth loss, necessitating prosthodontic interventions to maintain their oral health [2][3][4]. The acquisition of required prosthodontic treatment is a significant determinant in sustaining optimal oral health, hence impacting an individual's overall satisfaction and quality of life [5][6][7][8]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background It is crucial to take into account the concerns of dental patients about their prosthodontic needs when planning the course of treatment. However, there is a dearth of research that examines these needs among adult dental patients. Objectives This study aims to translate and validate the perceived prosthodontic treatment need scale (PPTN) in Arabic. Methods The 17-item PPTN scale was translated from English into Arabic and completed by 206 patients seeking prosthodontic treatment in a dental hospital in Saudi Arabia. Data collection was carried out in September and October 2023. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to ascertain the underlying factor structure; a unidimensional scale was hypothesised and tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), including several multiple model fit indices. The assessment of reliability was conducted using Cronbach’s alpha. The convergent and discriminant validity of the final scale were examined. Results EFA produced an 11-item scale distributed into three factors that explain 65.43% of the total variance with eigenvalues > 1. All items showed acceptable reliability, ranging from 0.65 to 0.84. The first factor pertained to social issues, while the second item was concerning dental appearance. Lastly, the third factor included functional difficulties associated with tooth loss or dental problems. The results of the CFA demonstrate a satisfactory level of model fit, with the standardised factor loadings ranging from 0.51 to 0.89. Convergent and discriminant validity of the model factors were established. Conclusion The translated questionnaire was deemed legitimate and would be useful in comprehending patients’ perceived treatment requirements, hence contributing to the advancement of prosthodontic research and practical implementation.
... Also, the data showed that age was a confounding factor. Previous literature confirmed that the OHRQoL of denture wearers depends on age (2,9,16,17). The age effect can be explained by the fact that the number of missing teeth increases with age and the chances of using a complete denture increase. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Dentures, both partial and complete, have been shown to have the same impact on one's quality of life. Due to the impossibility of randomization in these studies, they are prone to selection bias. This study aimed to compare the effect of partial and complete dentures on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) by propensity score to overcome selection bias. Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study. A total of 1376 people participated in this study. Age, sex, marital status, education level, smoking, smoking opium and its derivatives, and dental visit was collected by a checklist. OHRQoL was measured by the OHIP-14 questionnaire. The generalized boosted model was used to estimate the propensity score. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputations with mixed models. The assumptions of multivariable regression analysis and propensity score method were first examined, and then the quality of life related to oral health was compared between the two groups. Results: The regression model's assumptions were not verified due to high skewness and collinearity. The results of the normality test (P < 0.001) and goodness fit test (P < 0.001) revealed that the regression model did not fit the data. The propensity score method reduced at least 76% of the bias resulting from the distribution difference between the confounding variables and was used for analysis. In the regression and propensity score method, the results showed that the total OHIP-14 score of the complete prosthesis group was higher than the partial prosthesis group at 3.92 (95% CI = (2.18,5.65)) and 3.64 (95% CI = (1.93,4.53)), respectively. This difference was clinically and statistically significant (P < 0.001). In addition, there is a significant difference in the two groups based on propensity in all seven areas (P < 0.001). But there is no significant difference in the regression adjustment of the Functional limitation of the two groups (P = 0.035). Conclusion: The propensity score has fewer assumptions than the regression method and may be more reliable for OHIP scores. The propensity score analysis revealed that despite the costs and repair issues associated with partial dentures, complete denture wearers have lower OHRQoL than partial denture wearers.
... It has also been shown that gingivitis and periodontitis can be satisfactorily treated if plaque control is established; it has been shown that removable partial dentures adversely affect the patient's periodontal condition. Longitudinal studies indicate that removable partial dentures have been associated with increased gingivitis, periodontitis, and abutment mobility [6][7][8][9] . The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of removable partial dentures (RPD) on the periodontal health. ...
Article
OBJECTIVES: Periodontitis is a severe gum infection that can lead to loss of tooth and other health problems. The present study attempts to evaluate the association of periodontitis with removable partial denture. METHODOLOGY: A total of 100 subjects visiting the dental department of DHQ hospital Buner, consisting of 65 males and 35 females with age range of 30-60 years having periodontitis were investigated. RESULTS: The subjects wearing removable partial dentures showed increased prevalence of periodontitis irrespective of age and sex. Lack of awareness and socioeconomic status of the study population were the main contributing factors. CONCLUSION: The study concludes a strong association of periodontitis and removable partial dentures. Proper and regular maintenance of the oral and denture hygiene can prevent periodontal diseases.
... General population are motivated to maintain good oral hygiene and use mask, follow the proper brushing techniques to reduce the need for dental procedures, during the pandemic [11]. As most of the dental clinics only provide low-risk procedures such as tooth extraction, which could increase the demand for removable prosthetic treatments in the future [20]. However, as the pandemic continued, it has been proposed that dental settings can deliver non-emergency treatments as well. ...
Article
Full-text available
A new coronavirus (Sars-CoV-2) was detected in China at the end of 2019 and has since caused a worldwide pandemic. The Sars-CoV-2 is highly infective through airborne contamination, the high infection risk in the dental environment is a serious problem for both professional practitioners and patients. Present study was done to evaluate the impact of Corona Virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on dental practice by conducting an online questionnaire among the dental practitioners of 2 nearby districts of Jhanshi and Datia
... The public organizations suggested that the general population should increase their oral hygiene and implement preventive care to reduce the need for dental procedures, during the pandemic (24). As most of the dental clinics only provide low-risk procedures such as tooth-extraction, which could increase the demand for removable prosthetic treatments in the future (31). However, as the pandemic continued, it has been proposed that dental settings can deliver non-emergency treatments as well. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Background: The highly contagious nature of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2), besides the fact that dental procedures commonly generate blood and saliva droplets that could lead to the contagion have resulted in the closure of many dental clinics. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on dental practice by conducting an online questionnaire among the Iranian dental practitioners and finding their perspectives on the subject. Methods: This report is based on a questionnaire that was conducted among Iranian dentists. The survey included questions that evaluate the dentists’ perceptions and attitudes toward the COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on their personal life, financial status, and the quality of dental services for patients. Results: Overall, 240 dentists contributed to this study (214 general dentists and 26 specialists). The majority of the participants (n=170, 70%) did not perform non-emergency procedures during the pandemic. The dental practitioners have suggested several strategies to decrease the risk of contagion, such as reducing treatment sessions (n=90, 37%), strict triage of patients (n=156, 64%), and using personal protective equipment (n=108, 45%). However, most of the dentists (n=210, 87%) had problems, providing personal protective equipment during the pandemic. Moreover, 97% (n=234) of the participants reported that they encountered a decrease in their financial income since the eruption of the pandemic. Conclusion: Dental health care workers are at the highest risk of contracting COVID-19. Thus dental practioners ought to execute the standard protocols more cautiously during the pandemic. They could also lower their work hours and limit dental procedures to emergency treatments to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission. Besides, the public organizations should provide proper equipment for the dental practitioners to decrease the risk of contagion.
Article
Full-text available
Aim: To evaluate the impact of wearing removable partial dentures on the periodontal health of abutments and find outtheage and gender association. Study design: Descriptive case series. Place and duration: Prosthodontic department of Lahore Medical and Dental College Lahore, from15th January till 15thJuly 2023. Methodology: A total of 70 patients of both genders participated in the study. Removable dentures were delivered to the patients and they were recalled after one month of denture insertion to evaluate the abutment health, gingival recession was checked in terms of its presence or absence, plaque and gingival health index assessment were done using Loe and Silness index. Tooth mobility was checked by using Millar’s classification. Mean and SD was computed for quantitative data. Age and gender correlation was assessed using Pearson Chi -square test. Significant level was set to p<0.05. Results: A total 41.4%males and 58.6% females were selected. A total of 68.6% maxillary partial dentures whereas 31.4% mandibular partial dentures were inserted. Gingival health index showed maximum patients with good health 57.1%. Dental plaque index of maximum patients 77.1% fell under zero score. Tooth mobility score of zero was frequently found in abutments 78.6%. Gingival recession around the abutments after one month of denture insertion was found in 15.7%whereas 84.3% abutments remained healthy. Association of Gingival index, plaque index, tooth mobility and gingival recession with gender did not show statistical significance however with respect to age significant results were obtained. Tooth mobility had no association with age. Conclusion: Removable partial dentures use does not disturb the periodontal health of abutments if well fabricated dentures are provided and good oral hygiene maintenance protocolsare followed. Patients’ education regarding denture use along with regular recall visits are of utmost importance. Keywords: Abutment, Acrylic dentures, dental plaque, Removable partial dentures, Periodontal health, periodontal diseases.
Article
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, eklemeli üretim tekniği ile üç boyutlu (3B) yazıcı ile üretilen hareketli protezlerde kullanılan farklı kimyasal yapıya sahip yapay dişlerin renk değişimine yüze bitirme ve termal devirlendirme ile yaşlandırma işlemlerinin etkisini in vitro olarak incelemektir. Gereç ve yöntem: Bu çalışmada üç boyutlu yazıcı ile üretilen iki farklı yapay diş rezin materyali; metilmetakrilak (MMA) içermeyen (PowerResins Temp; DentaFab, Türkiye) ve metilmetakrilat oligomer içerikli (Flexcera™Smile; Desktop Health, Envision TEC™ systems, Almanya) kullanıldı. Her bir materyalden 15x10x3 mm. Boyutlarında 30 adet olacak şekilde, toplam 60 adet örnek hazırlandı. Örnekler farklı yüzey bitirme işlemleri uygulanması amacı ile iki gruba ayrıldı (n=15). Birinci grupta örneklere yüzey işlemi olarak farklı grenlerde silisyum karbür zımpara kâğıtları (VIBRATITE 996A, Çin) kullanılarak zımpara işlemi uygulandı. İkinci grupta ise 400 gritlik zımpara uygulamasının ardından pomza ile yüzey düzeltildi ve en son Evrensel Parlatma Pastası, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lihtenştayn) kullanılarak bitirme işlemi tamamlandı. Yüzey bitirme işlemlerinin ardından örneklerin birinci renk ölçümleri (T0) bir Spektrofotometre (VITA Easyshade® V, Almanya) kullanılarak yapıldı. Ardından örneklere 5.000 kez 5-55°C de termal devirlendirme yöntemi ile yapay yaşlandırma işlemi uygulandıktan sonra ikinci renk ölçümleri (T1) tamamlandı. Renk farklılıklarının (∆E00) belirlenmesinde CIE2000 formülü kullanıldı. Veriler iki yönlü varyans analiz kullanılarak istatistik olarak değerlendirildi (p
Article
Full-text available
This paper provides practical advice on the choice of health related quality of life measures. It starts by making explicit a series of underlying assumptions and then advises on selecting a measure as a trade-off between three sets of conditions: The purpose of collecting HQoL information, which considers the objectives of the study, the level of analysis, the population to be studied and the audience to whom the data will be presented. The qualities of the measure, including the need for a strong conceptual basis, pragmatic considerations, face and content validity, adequate psychometric properties and for the measure to be acceptable to the people participating in the study. The use of the measure, including the mode of administration and resource requirements. An earlier version of this paper was published as Robinson, P.G. (2016): Wahl der messinstrumente zur ermittlung der gesundheitsbezogenen lebensqualitat. In: Kovacs, L., Kipke, R., Lutz, R. (eds) Lebensqualitat in der medizin. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp201-222.
Article
Full-text available
Diseases and disorders that damage the mouth and face can disturb well-being and his self-esteem. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) is a relatively new but rapidly growing notion. The concept of OHRQOL can become a tool to understand and shape not only the state of clinical practice, dental research and dental education but also that of community at large. There are different approaches to measure OHRQOL; the most popular one is multiple item questionnaires. OHRQOL should be the basis for any oral health programme development. Moreover, research at the conceptual level is needed in countries where OHRQOL has not been previously assessed, including India.
Article
Full-text available
In recent years quality of life instruments have been featured as primary outcomes in many randomized trials. One of the challenges facing the investigator using such measures is determining the significance of any differences observed, and communicating that significance to clinicians who will be applying the trial results. We have developed an approach to elucidating the significance of changes in score in quality of life instruments by comparing them to global ratings of change. Using this approach we have established a plausible range within which the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) falls. In three studies in which instruments measuring dyspnea, fatigue, and emotional function in patients with chronic heart and lung disease were applied the MCID was represented by mean change in score of approximately 0.5 per item, when responses were presented on a seven point Likert scale. Furthermore, we have established ranges for changes in questionnaire scores that correspond to moderate and large changes in the domains of interest. This information will be useful in interpreting questionnaire scores, both in individuals and in groups of patients participating in controlled trials, and in the planning of new trials.
Article
Full-text available
Despite its relatively recent emergence over the past few decades, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) has important implications for the clinical practice of dentistry and dental research. OHRQoL is a multidimensional construct that includes a subjective evaluation of the individual's oral health, functional well-being, emotional well-being, expectations and satisfaction with care, and sense of self. It has wide-reaching applications in survey and clinical research. OHRQoL is an integral part of general health and well-being. In fact, it is recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an important segment of the Global Oral Health Program (2003). This paper identifies the what, why, and how of OHRQoL and presents an oral health theoretical model. The relevance of OHRQoL for dental practitioners and patients in community-based dental practices is presented. Implications for health policy and related oral health disparities are also discussed. A supplemental Appendix contains a Medline and ProQuest literature search regarding OHRQoL research from 1990-2010 by discipline and research design (e.g., descriptive, longitudinal, clinical trial, etc.). The search identified 300 articles with a notable surge in OHRQoL research in pediatrics and orthodontics in recent years.
Article
Full-text available
Aesthetics and function of the orofacial region are very important aspects of human life which may be affected by tooth loss and impact on the quality of life. The aim of this study was to identify the effects of anterior tooth loss on patients' quality of life and satisfaction with their dentition. Fifty partially edentulous patients with missing anterior teeth and 50 control subjects who had no missing teeth were recruited into the study. The control subjects matched the patients by age, gender, and level of education. A Dental Impact on Daily Living questionnaire was used to assess dental impacts on daily living and satisfaction with the dentition. Tooth loss has a definite measurable impact on patients' daily living and satisfaction with their appearance, pain levels, oral comfort, general performance, and eating capacities (p = 0.000). Age and level of education had no effect on patients' total satisfaction with their dentition and daily living. However, females were less satisfied with appearance, general performance and eating (p = 0.003, 0.005 and 0.007 respectively) than males. There were significant correlations between the number of missing anterior teeth and patients' total satisfaction (p = 0.028) and patients satisfaction with appearance, oral comfort, general performance, and eating dimensions (p = 0.001, 0.048, 0.011 and 0.009 respectively). Tooth loss has definitive impact on patients' satisfaction with their dentition regardless of personal factors such as age, gender and level of education. The higher the number of missing teeth the lower the levels of satisfaction with the dentition and daily living.
Article
The adequacy of prescription for fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures is often regarded as being less than ideal. This study examines the nature and quality of written instructions and master impression sent to dental laboratories in Ireland for fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial denture frameworks. Questionnaires were issued to dental laboratories seeking specific information relating to the materials (impression materials and trays) and written instructions supplied, as well as the technicians' opinion regarding the suitability of these materials. One hundred completed questionnaires were returned. One-third of master impressions were made using a plastic stock tray and alginate; technicians felt that one-fifth of master impressions were unsuitable; almost three-fifths of written instructions were inadequate. The quality of clinical information examined was found to be less than adequate.
Article
Abstract Growing recognition that quality of life is an important outcome of dental care has created a need for a range of instruments to measure oral health-related quality of life. This study aimed to derive a subset of items from the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-49) - a 49-item questionnaire that measures people's perceptions of the impact of oral conditions on their well-being. Secondary analysis was conducted using data from an epidemiologic study of 1217 people aged 60+ years in South Australia. Internal reliability analysis, factor analysis and regression analysis were undertaken to derive a subset (OHIP-14) questionnaire and its validity was evaluated by assessing associations with sociodemographic and clinical oral status variables. Internal reliability of the OHIP-14 was evaluated using Cronbach's coefficient α. Regression analysis yielded an optimal set of 14 questions. The OHIP-14 accounted for 94% of variance in the OHIP-49; had high reliability (α=0.88); contained questions from each of the seven conceptual dimensions of the OHIP-49; and had a good distribution of prevalence for individual questions. OHIP-14 scores and OHIP-49 scores displayed the same pattern of variation among sociodemographic groups of older adults. In a multivariate analysis of dentate people, eight oral status and sociodemographic variables were associated (P<0.05) with both the OHIP-49 and the OHIP-14. While it will be important to replicate these findings in other populations, the findings suggest that the OHIP-14 has good reliability, validity and precision.
Article
Statement of problem: Little is known about the outcomes of treatment with mandibular removable partial dentures provided by dentists in private dental practice. Purpose: This study examined 15 aspects of patient satisfaction and explored the factors found to be associated with dissatisfaction. Material and methods: A questionnaire was mailed to people whose dental insurance claims included CPT Code 5214 within the last 5 years. A composite measure of treatment outcome was created by combining the responses to the 15 satisfaction items, and 10 factors were then tested statistically to determine their relationship to dissatisfaction. Results: A majority of the respondents were satisfied with the prosthesis, but a substantial amount of dissatisfaction existed. Dissatisfaction was greater when there was no previous wearing experience or when there was an opposing maxillary removable partial denture. Respondents under the age of 60 expressed more dissatisfaction than did those over the age of 60, and subjects with lower levels of general health also reported less satisfaction. One third of the respondents believed their prosthesis required adjustment or replacement, and one fourth said the removable partial denture had caused a problem with the natural teeth. Conclusion: A majority of survey respondents treated with a mandibular removable partial denture in private dental practice were satisfied with the prosthesis, but a substantial amount of dissatisfaction existed. Dissatisfaction was related to age, health, prior experience with a prosthesis, and the type of opposing dentition.
Article
Traditionally, longitudinal studies of oral health have measured only disease progression and ignored improvements in health. This study examines methodological issues that arise in longitudinal assessment of change in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL). Baseline and 2-year follow-up data were used from an observational longitudinal study of 498 people aged 60 years or more living in South Australia. Oral health-related quality of life was measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). Three hypothesized risk predictors (tooth loss, problem-based dental visits and financial hardship) were selected to examine the effects of four methods of measuring change: categorical measures of improvement, deterioration and net change, and a quantitative measure of net change in OHIP scores. Some 31.7% of people experienced some improvement and 32.7% experienced some deterioration in OHRQOL. All three high-risk groups had approximately twice the rate of deterioration in OHRQOL compared with their corresponding low-risk groups. Surprisingly, high-risk groups also had higher rates of improvement. When measured categorically, these effects did not cancel one another, indicating that improvement and deterioration in OHRQOL can be experienced simultaneously. However, quantitative analyses cause improvements and deteriorations to cancel, and analysis of mean OHIP scores created a spurious impression that change in OHRQOL did not differ between dental visit groups. Furthermore, changes in mean OHIP scores were masked by regression to the mean. Oral health-related quality of life measures capture both improvement and deterioration in health status, creating new complexities for conceptualizing and analyzing change in longitudinal studies.
Article
In the context of clinical trials, measurement of change is critical. The aim of this study was to determine the minimally important difference (MID) for the Oral Health Impact Profile-20 (OHIP-20) when used with partially dentate patients undergoing treatment that included the provision of removable partial dentures. In a prospective clinical trial, 51 consecutive patients were provided with removable partial dentures. In addition to demographic and dental status data, patients completed an OHIP-20 prior to treatment. One month postoperatively, patients completed a post-treatment OHIP-20 and a global transition scale. Domains assessed in the global transition scale were appearance, ability to chew food, oral comfort, and speech. The MID for the OHIP-20 was calculated using the anchor-based approach. From the initial sample of 51 patients, 44 completed post-treatment questionnaires and were included in the analysis. Change scores in the four transition domains indicated that new dentures had a positive impact in the majority of subjects, especially in perceived impact on chewing and appearance. The study provided a guideline as to what constitutes the MID for the OHIP-20. This benchmark can be used when interpreting the impact of clinical intervention for replacing missing teeth and for power calculation in statistical analyses.