ArticlePDF Available

Lizard tail-loss rates on islands are not governed by longer life spans



We recently studied whether, on islands, predation or intraspecific aggression is the main driver of tail-loss, a common defense mechanism among lizards. We concluded the latter was the stronger driver (Itescu et al. 2017). Werner (2017) suggested that we failed to falsify an alternative hypothesis. He claims that on low-predation islands lizards live longer. Thus while tail loss is caused by predators, it accumulates over longer periods, resulting in overall higher tail-loss rates in populations experiencing weak predation. Here we test this hypothesis and three other arguments he presented, and fail to support them. We therefore adhere to our original conclusion that intraspecific aggression is the main driver of lizard tail loss on islands. Keywords: conspecific aggression; geckos; islands; longevity; predation; tail autotomy
Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution, 2017
Tail loss (autotomy) is a common defense mechanism
among many lizard groups (Bateman & Fleming 2009).
While traditionally it is considered an anti-predatory
mechanism (Arnold 1988; Chapple & Swain, 2002; Pafilis
et al. 2009a), accumulating evidence suggest it functions
also as defense against intraspecific aggression (Pafilis
etal. 2009b; Brock et al. 2015; Donihue et al. 2016).
Recently we studied whether tail loss of two species
of geckos (Mediodactylus kotschyi and Hemidactylus
turcicus) on islands is mainly driven by predation or by
intraspecific aggression (Itescu et al. 2017). We provided
several lines of evidence supporting the latter possibility,
and could find no data to suggest the former was impor-
tant in this system. Werner (2017) argues that we failed
to falsify an alternative hypothesis: that the high tail-loss
frequencies on predator-poor islands do result from preda-
tion, rather than from conspecific aggression. He claims
that on such islands lizards live longer, due to lower preda-
tion, and thus even if tail loss rates due to predation inci-
dents are low, they accumulate over longer periods. This
results in greater overall population-level regenerated-tail
frequencies (Werner 2017). His only reservation concerns
predator-free islands: he concurs with us that the high
tail-loss rates we have found on such islands are driven
by intraspecific aggression. We acknowledge that his
hypothesis is feasible in principle. We disagree, howev-
er, to the notion that it could aptly explain tail-loss fre-
quencies in our study system. Werner (2017) presented
no new observational or experimental data or analyses.
He provided only circumstantial evidence to support his
speculations. Therefore we tested the following hypotheses
he presented:
1. Tail-loss is expected to increase with body size, es-
pecially when sexes are examined separately, since
body size reflects lizard age.
2. Mediodactylus kotschyi inhabits many more islands
than H. turcicus because their regenerated tails keep
their cryptic form and function for avoiding preda-
tion, unlike the relatively conspicuous regenerated
tails of H. turcicus.
3. Mediodactylus kotschyi has higher autotomy rates
than H. turcicus among the populations we stud-
ied (Itescu et al. 2017) on both the islands and the
4. Mediodactylus kotschyi is more exposed to predation
(i.e. encounters more predator species) than H. turci-
cus because it is cathemeral (active both at day and at
night), and this explains their higher tail-loss rates.
To test prediction #1 we used the sex-specific tail-loss
rates reported in Table S1 in Itescu et al. (2017) and sex-
specific body-size means for each studied population
(not presented in Itescu et al. 2017) that we report here
To test prediction #2 we used data from a literature
survey conducted by Itescu (2017) to gather all published
locality records of reptile species from Aegean and Ionian
Sea islands (our study system). We counted the numbers
of reptilian predator species of the two focal gecko species
on all the islands which only one of them inhabits, and
tested whether islands inhabited only by M. kotschyi have
more predators on average than those inhabited only by
H. turcicus.
Lizard tail-loss rates on islands are not governed by longer life spans
Yuval Itescua,*, Rachel Schwarza, Shai Meiria and Panayiotis Pafilisb
aSchool of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel;
bSection of Zoology and Marine Biology, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian
University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis, Ilissia, Athens 157-84, Greece
Abstract We recently studied whether, on islands, predation or intraspecific aggression is the main driver of tail-loss, a
common defense mechanism among lizards. We concluded the latter was the stronger driver (Itescu et al. 2017). Werner
(2017) suggested that we failed to falsify an alternative hypothesis. He claims that on low-predation islands lizards live
longer. Thus while tail loss is caused by predators, it accumulates over longer periods, resulting in overall higher tail-loss
rates in populations experiencing weak predation. Here we test this hypothesis and three other arguments he presented, and
fail to support them. We therefore adhere to our original conclusion that intraspecific aggression is the main driver of lizard
tail loss on islands.
Keywords: conspecic aggression; geckos; islands; longevity; predation; tail autotomy
*Corresponding author. E-mail:
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2017
2Y. Itescu et al.
We used the data we reported in the text and Table1
of Itescu et al. (2017) to test predictions #3 (both for the
islands and for the mainland) and #4. To test prediction
#4 we also counted diurnal predator richness (cathemeral
species were counted as nocturnal) on each island that both
geckos were sampled from. The nocturnal and cathemeral
predators of geckos that were excluded from this count
were Martes foina, Meles meles, Felis (sylvestris) catus,
Erinacerus concolor, Athene noctua, Eryx jaculus, Tele-
scopus fallax, and Vipera ammodytes (see Appendix S1 in
Itescu et al. 2017 for all potential predators on the islands).
We then divided autotomy rates of M. kotschyi by those of
H. turcicus on each such island and regressed that against
diurnal-predator richness on the island. We expected a pos-
itive relationship if indeed M. kotschyi are subject to more
predatory attacks from diurnal species (and thus more au-
totomy) due to their less-nocturnal life style.
Regressing tail-loss rates on body size for each sex sepa-
rately, showed that the pattern is similar to what we reported
previously (Itescu et al. 2017) regardless of sex: mean body
size (which, to Werner, is equivalent to mean age) is not
related to tail-loss rates across insular populations in either
M. kotschyi (males: slope=0.009±0.008, n=41 islands,
R2=0.035, p= 0.236; females: slope = −0.003 ± 0.008,
n = 41, R2 = 0.005, p = 0.649) or H. turcicus (males:
slope=0.028±0.017, n=17, R2=0.159, p=0.118; females:
slope=−0.004±0.030, n=17, R2=0.001, p=0.898). This
refutes hypothesis 1.
The data we gathered from the literature on 427 islands
in the Aegean and Ionian Seas shows that M. kotschyi was
recorded on 289 islands, while H. turcicus is only known
from 121 islands. In contrast to expectations from hypothe-
sis #2, mean predator richness was higher on islands inhab-
ited only by H. turcicus, than on those inhabited only by
M. kotschyi (mean predator richness on 203 islands with
only M. kotschyi: 0.24± 0.04 [range: 0–4, median = 0],
mean predator richness on 35 islands with only H. turcicus:
2.94±0.75 [range: 0–14, median=1], t=3.59, p=0.001).
Thus a cryptic regenerated tail does not seem to be an ad-
aptation to increased predation, refuting hypothesis #2.
Mediodactylus kotschyi had higher autotomy rates
on 10 of the 17 islands from which we sampled both spe-
cies (Itescu et al. 2017), while H. turcicus had higher rates
on 7 islands. The dierence is not statistically significant
(χ2= 1.059, p=0.303). Furthermore, a paired t-test com-
paring tail-loss rates across these 17 islands shows no sig-
nificant dierence in tail-loss rate between these species
(M. kotschyi mean rate = 0.72 ± 0.02, H. turcicus =
0.66 ± 0.04, t = 1.257, p= 0.226). A χ2 test showed no
dierence on the mainland as well (χ2=10.23, p=0.332).
Thus prediction #3 is refuted for both the mainland and
the islands.
Regressing the M. kotschyi/H. turcicus tail-loss ratio
against diurnal-predator richness across islands showed
no significant relationship (slope = 0.050 ± 0.029, n =
17 islands, R2 = 0.166, p = 0.104). This demonstrates
M. kotschyi tail-loss rates do not increase due to their
less-nocturnal activity habits and hence their exposure to
diurnal predators in addition to nocturnal ones, and refutes
prediction #4.
We have found that on predator-free islands tail loss rates
(self-evidently caused by conspecifics) are the highest
(Itescu et al. 2017). Thus, if conspecifics can drive tail loss
on these islands, we see no reason to infer that this does not
happen elsewhere, where predators exist, but simultane-
ously intraspecific competition is high. Furthermore, even
if on low-predation islands lizards live longer, tail-loss is
unlikely to be solely caused by predation, and not at all by
conspecific aggression.
Werner’s assumption requires an unsubstantiated fac-
tor: that the reduction in predation rates on islands is lower
than the relative increase in longevity (so that overall is-
land individuals will encounter more predation attempts
over their lifetimes). We are aware of no data that substan-
tiates either the notion that longevity is indeed higher on
islands in general, or that overall predation rates decrease
less than longevity increases. Another potential explana-
tion could be that insular predators are less ecient than
mainland predators, and hence more of their predation
attempts end in a lizard losing its tail, rather than being
preyed upon. Again we are unaware of any data that sup-
port this notion.
We view these explanations, without supporting evi-
dence, as non-parsimonious: we have shown that increased
gecko density and decreased number of predators result in
higher rates of tail loss. If on islands with few predators
lizards live longer, then the probability of tail breakage re-
sulting from intraspecific aggression will also increase (we
know of no record of intraspecific killing of adults in either
H. turcicus or M. kotschyi). To assume that reduced preda-
tion results in more predator-induced tail losses requires
more unsubstantiated assumptions as to the relative rate of
predation decrease vs. longevity increase, or unsubstanti-
ated assumptions regarding predation eciency.
Werner (2017) implies (without data), that mean adult
body size on islands reflects mean adult age in reptiles. We
suspect this is untrue when multiple insular populations
of a single species are considered: in our study system
on the Aegean islands, lizards such as Podarcis spp. and
M. kotschyi have inter-island variability in size that can
amount to almost double in SVL and threefold dierence
in body weight (Pafilis etal. 2009b; Meiri et al. 2014; Itescu
et al. 2018). In fact, adults in some populations are small-
er than sub-adults on other islands (Fig.1). Furthermore,
across its large range we have shown that size maxima for
H. turcicus occur on islands that harbor predators (Itescu
et al. 2016). These were not expected to be particularly
long-living, according to Werner, and hence would be
predicted to be small. Furthermore, inter-island size dif-
ferences are already observed in hatchlings (e.g., Pafilis et
al. 2009b), and are maintained through growth to adult-
hood (Schwarz 2016). The age argument therefore does not
seem to hold. Without data on actual age structure of each
population (which we currently do not possess), regressing
Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution 3
body size against autotomy rates across populations is the
best test we can provide for this hypothesis. We found and
reported no correlation between body size and autotomy
rates before (Itescu et al. 2017) and here we showed that
analyzing males and females separately does not change
the picture. Thus, neither our previous nor our new results
provide any support for this hypothesis.
Werner (2017) further argues that the ability for ef-
fective crypsis for M. kotschyi is kept even after tail loss
and regeneration, while that of H. turcicus does not. He
postulates that this allows M. kotschyi to better cope with
predators and possibly populate more islands. Our results
imply the exact opposite: H. turcicus inhabits islands with
more predators, suggesting that if anything, H. turcicus
can survive better on predator-rich islands. Mediodacty-
lus kotschyi on the other hand abounds on small, predator
free islands as well as on large ones. We suspect this may
reflect colonization or survival ability rather than an anti-
predatory mechanism.
The statement that our data show M. kotschyi has
higher autotomy rates than H. turcicus is simply errone-
ous. Table1 of Itescu et al. (2017) and associated analyses
here show this is wrong. We also suspect that the argument
regarding the reduced exposure of H. turcicus to preda-
tors because of its more nocturnal habits is neither correct
nor relevant. Although M. kotschyi is indeed active both
at day and at night, while H. turcicus is mainly nocturnal,
the main predators of both these geckos on Aegean islands
(i.e., Vipera ammodytes and Telescopus fallax, Cattaneo
2010) are mainly nocturnal, and all islands from which
we sampled H. turcicus harbor nocturnal predators. Our
results here show that the diurnal predators are not driv-
ing increased tail loss in M. kotschyi. That said, activity
habit dierence producing more autotomy in M. kotschyi
is probably irrelevant since there is no dierence between
tail-loss rates in these species.
We therefore conclude that Werner’s hypotheses, al-
though feasible in principle, are neither the most parsimo-
nious nor are they supported by the data that were available
to him or by the new data presented herein. Consequently,
we adhere to our original conclusion (Itescu et al. 2017):
intraspecific aggression has a stronger impact than preda-
tion on tail-loss rates across the insular lizard populations
we studied. Our findings come to corroborate previous
studies that clearly demonstrated the predominant role of
intraspecific competition in caudal autotomy (Brock et al.
2015; Cooper et al. 2015; Donihue et al. 2016).
The study was funded by an Israel Science Foundation (ISF)
Grant #1005/12. We thank Herve Seligmann and an anonymous
referee for comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Arnold EN. (1988). Caudal autotomy as a defense. In: Biology of
the Reptilia. New York: Alan R. Liss. pp. 235–273.
Bateman PW, Fleming PA. (2009). To cut a long tail short: a re-
view of lizard caudal autotomy studies carried out over the
last 20 years. J Zool. 277, pp. 1–14.
Brock KM, Bedneko PA, Pafilis P, Foufopoulos J. (2015). Evo-
lution of antipredator behavior in an island lizard species,
Podarcis erhardii (Reptilia: Lacertidae): The sum of all
fears? Evolution. 69, pp. 216–231.
Cattaneo A. (2010). Note eco-morfologiche su alcune specie
ofidiche Egee, con particolare riferimento alle popolazioni
delle Cicladi centro-orientali (Reptilia). Natural. Sicil. 34,
pp. 319–350.
Chapple DG, Swain R. (2002). Eect of caudal autotomy on lo-
comotor performance in a viviparous skink, Niveoscincus
metallicus. Funct Ecol. 16, pp. 817–825.
Cooper WE, Dimopoulos I, Pafilis P. (2015). Sex, age, and popu-
lation density aect aggressive behaviors in island lizards
promoting cannibalism. Ethology 121, pp. 260–269.
Donihue CM, Brock KM, Foufopoulos J, Herrel A. (2016). Feed
or fight: testing the impact of food availability and intraspe-
cific aggression on the functional ecology of an island lizard.
Funct Ecol. 30, pp. 566–575.
Itescu Y, Schwarz R, Donihue C, Slavenko A, Roussos SA, Sago-
nas K,Valakos ED, Foufopoulos J, Pafilis P, Meiri S. (2018).
Inconsistent patterns of body size evolution in co-occurring
island reptiles. Global Ecol Biogeogr. In press.
Figure1. Mediodactylus kotschyi specimens demonstrating body size dierences across island populations: left – a young individual from
Amorgos Island; middle – an adult female from Amorgos Island; right – an adult female from Gavdos Island. Specimens are from Natural
History Museum Crete. Photo taken by Yuval Itescu.
Y. Itescu et al.
Itescu Y, Schwarz R, Meiri S, Pafilis P. (2017). Intra-specific com-
petition, not predation, drives lizard tail loss on islands. J
Anim Ecol 86, pp. 66–74.
Itescu Y, Schwarz R, Moses M, Pafilis P, Meiri S. (2016). Record
sizes for the Turkish house gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus,
from Aegean islands, Greece. Herpetol. Bull. 138, pp. 24–26.
Meiri S, Kadison AE, Novosolov M, Pafilis P, Foufopoulos J,
Itescu Y, Raia P, Pincheira-Donoso D. (2014). The number of
competitor species is unlinked to sexual dimorphism. J Anim
Ecol 83, pp. 1302–1312.
Pafilis P, Foufopoulos J, Poulakakis N, Lymberakis P, Valakos
ED. (2009a). Tail shedding in island lizards [Lacertidae,
Reptilia]: decline of antipredator defenses in relaxed preda-
tion environments. Evolution 63, pp. 1262–1278.
Pafilis P, Meiri S, Foufopoulos J, Valakos E. (2009b). Intraspe-
cific competition and high food availability are associated
with insular gigantism in a lizard. Naturwissenschaften 96,
pp. 1107–1113.
Schwarz R. (2016). Evolution of life history traits in lizards: A
local and global approach. M.Sc. thesis, School of Zoology,
Tel-Aviv University.
Werner YL. (2017). Commentary on the factors governing the
rate of tail loss in island lizards. Isr J Ecol Evol. In press.
Appendix 1. Data for sex-specific mean body size (in mm) in insular populations.
Island Mediodactylus kotschyi Hemidactylus turcicus
Females Males Females Males
Agios Eustathios 44.06 43.10
Amorgos 47.27 46.75 52.49 49.83
Anafi 46.05 41.66 52.09 50.41
Andreas 47.84 44.27
Andros 45.40 41.49 53.37 51.78
Antiparos 41.68 40.59 45.64 49.36
Apano Kufonisi 46.29 46.72 48.81 52.06
Aspronisi 46.16 43.61
Despotiko 42.43 39.81 49.55 48.60
Folegandros 49.32 47.25
Glaronisi 47.33 44.76
Ios 43.81 42.66 49.36 49.58
Iraklia 45.89 43.09 46.91 44.24
Karpathos 38.97 35.02
Kasos 37.81 34.96
Kato Fira 42.00 41.18
Kato Kufonisi 44.15 45.29
Kimolos 44.75 42.56 55.31 54.08
Kitriani 39.10 38.33
Kopria 45.21 47.01
Kythnos 43.44 39.62 49.22 49.23
Megali Fteno 44.35 47.21
Mikri Fteno 45.85 46.54
Milos 45.45 44.36
Mykonos 45.94 42.72 49.84 50.54
Naxos 42.99 42.69 48.42 50.87
Nikouria 46.82 45.15
Pachia 47.07 44.86
Palakida 34.57 34.04
Panteronisi 43.61 42.73
Paros 43.59 41.75 49.80 45.51
Polyaigos 44.56 44.38
Saria 38.32 35.97
Schinoussa 49.18 46.98 49.64 46.47
Serifos 45.71 42.49 46.92 46.59
Sifnos 43.08 41.63
Sikinos 43.69 42.72 44.93 46.28
Syrna 48.01 45.52
Syros 42.40 42.32 46.10 47.89
Tinos 42.50 40.71
Tsimintiri 41.80 40.38
Venetiko 43.74 41.61
... According to the traditional theory, tail shedding is mainly affected by predation pressure (Pianka 1970;Turner et al. 1982;Cooper et al. 2004). However, the importance of intraspecific competition as a cause of autotomy has been recently acknowledged (Corti et al. 2008;Pafilis et al. 2009b;Donihue et al. 2016;Itescu et al. 2017aItescu et al. , 2017b. ...
... The role of the latter enhances the long debate between the importance of predation pressure per se (high predation results in high levels of autotomy; Pianka 1970;Turner et al. 1982;Cooper et al. 2004) and that of predator efficiency (efficient predation results in low levels of autotomy, as most lizards are consumed entirely ;Schoener 1979;Medel et al. 1988;Bateman & Fleming 2011). Recent studies acknowledge intraspecific competition as an important factor in caudal autotomy performance Hare & Miller 2010;Donihue et al. 2016) or even recognise it as the primary cause (Pafilis et al. 2009a;Itescu et al. 2017aItescu et al. , 2017b. In our study system, it is not easy to define which factor interferes more and to what extent. ...
Full-text available
Various factors may alter anti-predatory responses among conspecifics. Here we assess some of these factors using three populations of a Mediterranean lizard (Acanthodactylus schreiberi) in Cyprus that differ in their habitat type, predator diversity and population density. We expected that predation would affect flight initiation distance (FID; the approach distance allowed to an observer before the lizard flees), escape distance (ED; the distance covered by the lizard from the point an escape attempt starts to the first place the lizard stops) and tail autotomy (autotomy rates, economy of autotomy, post-autotomy tail movement). We also predicted that juveniles, being more exposed to predators, would be more effective in their defensive responses. Our findings suggest that predation and population density appear to be associated with most autotomy traits but were not associated with FID and ED, which are better explained by refuge availability. The only ontogenetic difference was detected in the economy of autotomy: juveniles are more prone to autotomise, possibly because they do not experience such high costs as tailless adult individuals. Our results suggest that anti-predatory responses are influenced by a variety of factors. Unravelling the compound effects of all the factors involved should be the focus of future research.
... The proportion of damaged tails in Plakida Podarcis is very low (the lowest rate among 32 other populations was 50%, Brock et al., 2015). These data are in line with findings that dense populations exhibit high tail-autotomy proportions (Brock et al., 2015;Itescu et al., 2017Itescu et al., , 2018b) -regardless of body size (Itescu et al., 2018a). We suspect that the high autotomy rate of geckos results from inefficient predation by the lizards combined with intraspecific aggression. ...
Full-text available
Body size evolution on islands is widely studied and hotly debated. Gigantism and dwarfism are thought to evolve under strong natural selection, especially on small remote islands. We report a curious co-occurrence of both dwarf and giant lizards on the same small, remote island (Plakida): the largest Podarcis erhardii (Lacertidae) and smallest Mediodactylus kotschyi sensu lato; Gekkonidae — the two commonest insular reptiles in the Aegean Sea. The geckos of Plakida have a peculiar tail-waving behavior, documented here for the first time in this genus. We suspect that P. erhardii evolved large size to consume geckos and the geckos evolved a unique tail-waving behavior as a defensive mechanism.
Full-text available
Aegean Islands host a rich herpetofauna comprising a plethora of endemic taxa. Since the early 19th century, this unique diversity attracted numerous herpetologists that described the Greek species and provided records of their distribution. Interestingly, many new records on insular ranges are still added to the literature every year. During the last two decades, modern Systematics use powerful tools from the arsenal of molecular biology to unravel complicated phylogenies and shed light to hidden diversities. Current herpetological research focuses on the detection of cryptic species, yielding impressive findings. Another important research avenue includes the clarification of the particular adaptations that insular species adopted to survive under the demanding conditions of the Aegean Islands. Food scarcity, water dearth, high temperatures, relaxed predation and strong intraspecific competition are the main parameters shaping the ecophysiological profile of Aegean herptiles. However, the amphibians and reptiles of the Archipelago have to deal with serious threats. The most severe among them are habitat degradation and the loss of breeding-sites due to human activities and climate change. New phylogenetic data and well-justified gene trees together with the ongoing enhancement of our knowledge of species biology pave the way for the effective conservation of the matchless Aegean herpetofauna.
Full-text available
Animal signalling structures are amongst the most variable characteristics, as they are subjected to a diversity of selection pressures. A well-known example of a diverse signalling system in the animal kingdom is the dewlap of Anolis lizards. Dewlap characteristics can vary remarkably among and within species, and also between sexes. Although a considerable amount of studies have attempted to disentangle the functional significance of the staggering dewlap diversity in Anolis , the underlying evolutionary processes remain elusive. In this study, we focus on the contribution of biotic selective pressures in shaping geographic variation in dewlap design (size, colour, and pattern) and dewlap display behaviour at the intraspecific level. Notably, we have tried to replicate and extend previously reported results hereof in both sexes of the brown anole lizard ( Anolis sagrei ). To do this, we assembled a dataset consisting of 17 A. sagrei heterogeneous island populations from the Caribbean and specifically tested whether predation pressure, sexual selection, or species recognition could explain interpopulational variation in an array of dewlap characteristics. Our findings show that in neither males nor females estimates of predation pressure (island size, tail break frequency, model attack rate, presence of predatory Leiocephalus lizards) or sexual selection (sexual size dimorphism) could explain variation in dewlap design. We did find that A. sagrei males from larger islands showed higher dewlap display intensities than males from smaller islands, but the direct connection with predation pressure remains ambiguous and demands further investigation. Last, we could show indirect support for species recognition only in males, as they are more likely to have a ‘spotted’ dewlap pattern when co-occurring with a higher number of syntopic Anolis species. In conclusion, we found overall limited support for the idea that the extensive interpopulational variability in dewlap design and use in A. sagrei is mediated by variation in their biotic environment. We propose a variety of conceptual and methodological explanations for this unexpected finding.
Full-text available
Aim Animal body sizes are often remarkably variable across islands, but despite much research we still have a poor understanding of both the patterns and the drivers of body size evolution. Theory predicts that interspecific competition and predation pressures are relaxed on small, remote islands, and that these conditions promote body size evolution. We studied body size variation across multiple insular populations of 16 reptile species co‐occurring in the same archipelago and tested which island characteristics primarily drive body size evolution, the nature of the common patterns, and whether co‐occurring species respond in a similar manner to insular conditions. Location Aegean Sea islands. Time period 1984–2016. Major taxa studied Reptiles. Methods We combined fieldwork, museum measurements and a comprehensive literature survey to collect data on nearly 10,000 individuals, representing eight lizard and eight snake species across 273 islands. We also quantified a large array of predictors to assess directly the effects of island area, isolation (both spatial and temporal), predation and interspecific competition on body size evolution. We used linear models and meta‐analyses to determine which predictors are informative for all reptiles, for lizards and snakes separately, and for each species. Results Body size varies with different predictors across the species we studied, and patterns differ within families and between lizards and snakes. Each predictor influenced body size in at least one species, but no general trend was recovered. As a group, lizards are hardly affected by any of the predictors we tested, whereas snake size generally increases with area and with competitor and predator richness, and decreases with isolation. Main conclusions No factor emerges as a predominant driver of Aegean reptile sizes. This contradicts theories of general body size evolutionary trajectories on islands. We conclude that overarching generalizations oversimplify patterns and processes of reptile body size evolution on islands. Instead, species’ autecology and island particularities interact to drive the course of size evolution.
Full-text available
Opinions differ whether tail loss in lizards is mainly caused by predators or by intra-specific fighting. Recently this dilemma was investigated through a comparison of lizard tail loss rates between mainland populations in Greece and those on nearby islands harboring fewer predators. The higher tail loss rate on the islands was interpreted as due to the predation-free denser lizard populations having more intra-specific fighting (Itescu et al. 2017, Journal of Animal Ecology 86: 66-74). However, that analysis failed to exclude an alternative hypothesis which I propose and support with well documented circumstantial evidence: The lizards analyzed were Hemidactylus turcicus and Mediodactylus kotschyi (Gekkonidae), both relatively long-lived. On the predator-poor islands they could live longer due to the few predators and thus accumulate the low rate of tail loss. Moreover, both on the mainland and on the islands the tail loss rates are higher in M. kotschyi than in H. turcicus, although life spans are of similar order of magnitude, possibly longer in H. turcicus. But the latter is active at night whereas M. kotschyi is active also in daytime, exposed to more predators during more time. Thus also this inter-specific difference accords with the alternative hypothesis. The two processes are not mutually exclusive and both should be taken into account as potentially responsible for the rate of tail loss in lizards.
Full-text available
Tail autotomy is mainly considered an antipredator mechanism. Theory suggests that predation pressure relaxes on islands, subsequently reducing autotomy rates. Intraspecific aggression, which may also cause tail loss, probably intensifies on islands due to the higher abundance. We studied whether tail autotomy is mostly affected by predation pressure or by intraspecific competition. We further studied whether predator abundance or predator richness is more important in this context. To test our predictions, we examined multiple populations of two gecko species: Kotschy's gecko ( Mediodactylus kotschyi ; mainland and 41 islands) and the Mediterranean house gecko ( Hemidactylus turcicus ; mainland and 17 islands), and estimated their abundance together with five indices of predation. In both species, autotomy rates are higher on islands and decline with most predation indices, in contrast with common wisdom, and increase with gecko abundance. In M. kotschyi , tail‐loss rates are higher on predator and viper‐free islands, but increase with viper abundance. We suggest that autotomy is not simply, or maybe even mainly, an antipredatory mechanism. Rather, such defence mechanisms are a response to complex direct and indirect biotic interactions and perhaps, in the case of tail autotomy in insular populations, chiefly to intraspecific aggression.
Full-text available
Caudal autotomy, the ability to shed the tail, is common in lizards as a response to attempted predation. Since Arnold's substantial review of caudal autotomy as a defence in reptiles 20 years ago, our understanding of the costs associated with tail loss has increased dramatically. In this paper, we review the incidence of caudal autotomy among lizards (Reptilia Sauria) with particular reference to questions posed by Arnold. We examine tail break frequencies and factors that determine occurrence of autotomy in natural populations (including anatomical mechan-isms, predation efficiency and intensity, microhabitat preference, sex and ontoge-netic differences, as well as intraspecific aggression). We also summarize the costs associated with tail loss in terms of survivorship and reproduction, focusing on potential mechanisms that influence fitness (i.e. locomotion costs, behavioural responses and metabolic costs). Finally, we examine the factors that may influence the facility with which autotomy takes place, including regeneration rate, body form and adaptive behaviour. Taking Arnold's example, we conclude with proposals for future research.
Body size often varies among insular populations relative to continental conspecifics – the ‘island rule’ – and functional, context‐dependent morphological differences tend to track this body size variation on islands. Two hypotheses are often proposed as potential drivers of insular population differences in morphology: one relating to diet and the other involving intraspecific competition and aggression. We directly tested whether differences in morphology and maximum bite capacity were explained by interisland changes in hardness of both available and consumed prey, and levels of lizard‐to‐lizard aggression among small‐island populations. Our study included 11 islands in the Greek Cyclades and made use of a gradient in island area spanning five orders of magnitude. We focused on the widespread lizard Podarcis erhardii . We found that on smaller islands, P. erhardii body size was larger, head height was larger relative to body size, and maximum bite capacity became proportionally stronger. This pattern in morphology and performance was not related to differences in diet, but was highly correlated with proxies of intraspecific aggression – bite scars and missing toes. Our findings suggest that critical functional traits such as body size and bite force in P. erhardii follow the predictions of the island rule and are changing in response to changes in the competitive landscape across islands of different sizes.
Island populations may evolve distinct behavioral repertoires as a response to the conditions of insular life. Strong intraspecific competition is typical in insular lizards and may include cannibalism. In this study, we investigated sexual and age patterns of aggression in two populations of the Skyros wall lizard (Podarcis gaigeae), one from the main island of Skyros (Aegean Sea, Greece) and another from the satellite islet Diavates. The latter is terrestrial predator-free biotope, hosting a dense population of large-bodied lizards that have been reported to exert cannibalism. In staged encounters, we examined the aggressive propensities of adult male and female lizards against their age-peers and juveniles. Males from both populations were much more aggressive than females toward juveniles and other adults. Males from Diavates were more frequently aggressive to juveniles and other male lizards than males from Skyros. Diavates cannibals also captured their targets at shorter latency. We ascribe this distinct behavioral pattern to the high population density. Infanticide and intramale aggressiveness confer two great advantages to cannibals: food and elimination of future rivals.
Organisms generally have many defenses against predation yet may lack effective defenses if from populations without predators. Evolutionary theory predicts that ‘costly’ antipredator behaviors will be selected against when predation risk diminishes. We examined antipredator behaviors in Aegean wall lizards, Podarcis erhardii, across an archipelago of land-bridge islands that vary in predator diversity and period of isolation. We examined two defenses, flight initiation distance and tail autotomy. Flight initiation distance generally decreased with declining predator diversity. All predator types had distinctive effects on flight initiation distance with mammals and birds having the largest estimated effects. Rates of autotomy observed in the field were highest on predator-free islands yet laboratory-induced autotomy increased linearly with overall predator diversity. Against expectation from previous work, tail autotomy was not explained solely by the presence of vipers. Analyses of populations directly isolated from rich predator communities revealed that flight initiation distance decreased with increased duration of isolation in addition to the effects of current predator diversity, whereas tail autotomy could be explained simply by current predator diversity. Although selection against costly defenses should depend on time with reduced threats, different defenses may diminish along different trajectories even within the same predator-prey system.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Sexual size dimorphism ( SSD ) can allow males and females of the same species to specialize on different sized food items and therefore minimize intraspecific competition. Interspecific competition, however, is thought to limit sexual dimorphism, as larger competitors in the community will prevent the larger sex from evolving larger size, and smaller species may prevent the smaller sex from becoming even smaller. We tested this prediction using data on the sexual size dimorphism of lizards, and mammalian carnivores, on islands world‐wide. Because insular communities are depauperate, and guilds are species‐poor, it is often assumed that enhanced sexual size dimorphism is common on islands. The intensity of interspecific competition, hindering enhanced dimorphism, is thought to increase with competitor richness. We tested whether intraspecific sexual size dimorphism of mammalian carnivores and lizards decreases with increasing island species richness. We further computed the average sexual dimorphism of species on islands and tested whether species‐rich islands are inhabited by relatively monomorphic species. Within families and guilds across carnivores and lizards, and with both intraspecific and interspecific approaches, we consistently failed to find support for the notion that species‐poor islands harbour more sexually dimorphic individuals or species. We conclude that either interspecific competition does not affect the sexual size dimorphism of insular lizards and carnivores (i.e. character displacement and species sorting are rare in these taxa), or that the number of species in an assemblage or guild is a poor proxy for the intensity of interspecific competition in insular assemblages.