- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
OZONE AND PLANT LIFE: THE ITALIAN STATE-OF-THE-ART
Scarce evidence of ozone effect on recent health and productivity
of alpine forests—a case study in Trentino, N. Italy
Marco Ferretti
1,2
&Giovanni Bacaro
3
&Giorgio Brunialti
2
&Mauro Confalonieri
4
&Fabiana Cristofolini
5
&
Antonella Cristofori
5
&Luisa Frati
2
&Angelo Finco
6
&Giacomo Gerosa
6
&Simona Maccherini
2,7
&Elena Gottardini
5
Received: 18 April 2017 / Accepted: 2 January 2018 /Published online: 20 January 2018
#Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018
Abstract
We investigated the significance of tropospheric ozone as a factor explaining recent tree health (in terms of defoliation) and
productivity (in terms of basal area increment, BAI) in15 ICP Forests level I and one level II plots in alpine forests in Trentino (N.
Italy). Mean daily ozone summer concentrations varied between 30 and 72 parts per billion (ppb) leading to large exceedance of
concentration-based critical levels set to protect forest trees. Phytoxic ozone dose (POD
0
) estimated at the level II plot over the
period 1996–2009 was 31–61 mmol m
−2
projected leaf area (PLA). The role of ozone was investigated taking into account other
site and environmental factors. Simple linear regression, multiple linear regression (MLR, to study mean periodical defoliation
and mean periodical BAI), and linear mixed models (LMM, to study annual defoliation data) were used. Our findings suggest
that—regardless of the metric adopted—tropospheric ozone is not a significant factor in explaining recent status and trends of
defoliation and BAI in the alpine region examined. Both defoliation and BAI are in turn driven by biotic/abiotic damage,
nutritional status, DBH (assumed as a proxy for age), and site characteristics. These results contrast with available ozone-
growth dose response relationships (DRRs) and other observational studies. This may be due to a variety of concurrent reasons:
(i) DRRs developed for individual saplings under controlled condition are not necessarily valid for population of mature trees into
real forest ecosystems; (ii) some observational studies may have suffered from biased design; and (iii) since alpine forests have
been exposed to high ozone levels (and other oxidative stress) over decades, possible acclimation mechanisms cannot be
excluded.
Keywords Defoliation .Basal area increment .Linear mixed models .Multiple regression models .Stomatal flux .Tree rings
Introduction
Tropospheric ozone (O
3
) concentrations have increased glob-
ally during the twentieth century (Cooper et al. 2014). In rural
European environments, concentration has doubled from
about 10–15 ppb at the end of the nineteenth century to 20–
30 ppb in the 1980s (Volz and Kley 1988; Vingarzan 2004),
with further increase in many areas since then (Staehelin and
Schnadt Poberaj 2008;Cooperetal.2014). Such an increase
was attributed to an augmented net chemical production in the
troposphere due to increased precursor emissions, although
increases in the stratospheric source of ozone may also have
contributed (The Royal Society 2008). More recently, trends
have varied by region (Cooper et al. 2014; Tørseth et al.
2012), and in Western Europe mean summer concentration
at forested sites leveled off or decreased slightlysince the year
2000 (EEA 2014; Schaub et al. 2016a). Concentrations of 50–
80 ppb, however, are still frequent in many rural and remote
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
*Marco Ferretti
marco.ferretti@wsl.ch
1
Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forests, Snow, and Landscape
Research WSL, Züricherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
2
TerraData environmetrics, Spin-Off Company of the University of
Siena, Via L. Bardelloni 19, 58025 Monterotondo Marittimo,
Grosseto, Italy
3
Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri
10, 34127 Trieste, Italy
4
Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Servizio Foreste e Fauna, Via G.B.
Trener 3, 38121 Trento, Italy
5
Research and Innovation Centre,Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM),
Via E. Mach 1, 38010 San Michele all’Adige, Italy
6
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, via Musei 41,
25121 Brescia, Italy
7
Department of Life Science, University of Siena, Via P.A. Mattioli 4,
53100 Siena, Italy
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2018) 25:8217–8232
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1195-z
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.