Article

The Rise of Nationalism in a Cosmopolitan Port City: The Foreign Communities of Shanghai during the First World War

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

By the early 1900s, globalization and imperialism had created cosmopolitan cities such as the Chinese treaty port of Shanghai, where foreign minorities lived side by side. The outbreak of the First World War put enormous pressure on these multiethnic urban societies. By exploring how the war altered the cohabitation of Westerners in Shanghai, this article connects with current debates on the mechanisms of longdistance nationalism and cosmopolitanism as well as on the importation of conflict in diaspora communities. The many imperial diasporas of Shanghai mostly lived in the French- and British-controlled territories, where the balance of power was renegotiated during the war. Analyzing local community newspapers and diplomatic archives, this article explains why nationalism superseded the shared feeling of cosmopolitanism that prevailed before the war. The cosmopolitan tradition and political complexity clearly delayed the arrival of the war at Shanghai, but could not prevent the process. FIND FULLTEXT on UGent Repository: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8542593/file/8554276.pdf

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... Both utopic promises and dystopic failures seem to be entrapped in Shanghai's 'everyday cosmopolitanism' ingrained in the 1920s and 1930s (Vandamme 2018). The vintage family photos and the calendars are powerful images that connect us to the familial past, reproducing a doppelgänger resemblance to the uncanny memories of family members, as testimonies of time. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper examines the inextricable relationship between the uncanny effects of knocking down Shanghai’s central district and their traumatic post-colonial implications. The value of the Chinese ruin, with its apocalyptic and contemporary imagery, begs to be discussed from a western perspective of ruin admiration as a metaphor for decadence and melancholy. This points to a new consciousness of globalization as means of conceptualizing well-established post-colonial orders at the heart of the urban deterioration of cityscapes. As a potential concept to spark a dialogue of cosmopolitanism between China and the West, urban ruins can be analyzed as a transnational, creative ethos that reimagines the Chinese city as never before. Taking the work of the Canadian photographer Greg Girard (born 1955), this article examines how his photo-book presents a cosmopolitan image of Shanghai’s derelict ‘community lanes’ (longtangor lilong) built in the city’s International Concessions (1842-1949), in which the past, present, and future are interwoven and redeemed. The authors argue that his ruin photography not only retriggers material knowledge of the city but also repurposes transcultural and creative expressions of mutually-spectral moments of destruction and production between the East and the West, in which a myriad of potential features are discovered.
Thesis
Cette thèse se propose d’étudier la présence impériale formelle et informelle de l’Allemagne et de l’Autriche-Hongrie en Chine de 1895, date de l’obtention par l’Allemagne de deux concessions à Hankou et à Tianjin, jusqu’à l’armistice de 1918. Toute histoire des impérialismes étrangers en Chine se doit d’être à la fois connectée et multilatérale, aussi bien que d’envisager l’échelle locale, nationale, régionale et mondiale. Les différents impérialismes et micro-colonies ne peuvent en effet se comprendre par leur seul rapport au pays prédaté, ni à la métropole, mais entretiennent des relations étroites les uns avec les autres, ainsi qu’avec les colonies et les pays indépendants de leur environnement immédiat. Nous avons choisi d'étudier concurremment les présences impériales allemande et austro-hongroise en Chine en raison de leur relation spéciale et étroite sur le continent européen. Comment cette relation s'exprime-t-elle dans le contexte chinois ? Quelle est l'importance de cette présence impériale d'un ordre particulier dans la politique intérieure et extérieure de chacune de ces puissances européennes ? Quelle est, à l'inverse, la place et le rôle de l'Allemagne et de l'Autriche-Hongrie dans l'arène chinoise ? Quelle est la particularité, quelles sont les forces et les faiblesses de leurs impérialismes nationaux en Chine ? Ces deux puissances arrivent tard sur la scène chinoise et asiatique : Quels buts, ce faisant, poursuivent-elles ? Dans quelle mesure les ont-elles atteints ? Nous avons tenté de répondre à ces questions lors de l'écriture des deux parties chronologiques de la thèse, à savoir : les raisons de cet impérialisme, sa place dans l'histoire de l'Allemagne et de l'Autriche-Hongrie, dans leur politique étrangère, et spécifiquement européenne et coloniale, l'histoire des relations sino-allemandes, sino-austro-hongroises, et des interactions austro-allemandes en Chine, des origines à 1914 ; ainsi que le prolongement de ces diverses thématiques dans le cadre des hostilités européennes puis mondiales, de 1914 à 1918. Des questionnements particuliers parcourent la seconde partie de la thèse : Dans quelle mesure la guerre mondiale se retrouve en Chine et influence ce pays, sa politique intérieure, extérieure, ses rapports aux puissances impérialistes ? Que révèle la guerre du caractère et de l'efficacité des impérialismes allemand et austro-hongrois en Chine spécifiquement ? Dans quelle mesure enfin, la présence impériale allemande et austro-hongroise en Chine amène cette dernière à prendre dans la guerre un rôle spécifique, chinois et asiatique – Nous ne traitons pas ici de l'implication de la Chine dans les hostilités en Europe-même.
Book
Globalizations from Below uses a Constructivist International Relations approach that emphasizes the centrality of normative power to analyze and compare the four globalizations ‘from below.’ These are: (1) the counter-hegemonic globalization represented by the ‘movement of movements’ of alter-globalization transnational social activists, who try to put an end to the Neoliberal nature of the Western-centered globalization ‘from above’; (2) the non-hegemonic globalization enacted by ‘ant traders’ that are part of the transnational informal economy; (3) the partially similar Chinese-centered globalization, whose entrepreneurial migrants are strongly influenced and instrumentalized by the Chinese state; and (4) the first wave globalization ‘from below’ that paralleled (and outlived) the 1870–1914 globalization ‘from above.’ This book identifies their common features and uses them to define the concept of globalization ‘from below’ as a set of socio-economic or socio-political processes that involve large transnational flows of people, goods, and/or ideas characterized at least in part by informality. They are enacted by entrepreneurial or activistic individuals who either take advantage of the normative power of the hegemon at the origin of an international order and an associated globalization ‘from above,’ or – explicitly or implicitly – transgress, contest, and try to redefine dominant economic, legal, political, and socio-cultural norms, thus challenging the existing international order and globalization ‘from above.’ By constructing a unified theoretical framework, this book attempts to open a new field of interdisciplinary research that should take globalizations ‘from below’ out of their current scholarly marginality. This is one of the first scholarly works to collectively present more than one globalization ‘from below,’ and will be of great interest to students, scholars, and researchers of International Relations, International Political Economy, Development Studies, Economic History, Anthropology, Diaspora Studies, and Chinese Studies.
Article
Full-text available
This article critically surveys the current historiography of port cities, which have recently attracted a lot of interest, particularly from global historians of the 19th and early 20th century. The article contextualizes this body of scholarship within larger recent and older trends in the discipline. Recently, historians and other scholars have predominantly analyzed port cities as “nodal points” or “hubs” within global networks. The article argues that these perspectives project spatial patterns defined by the imaginary of globalization today into the past, failing to acknowledge how tightly interwoven globalization and urbanization were in port cities during the age of steam. However, port cities can provide concrete narrative focal points to develop empirically‐grounded global histories, and remind us of the various efforts to control, limit, or prevent unsolicited forms of mobility and entanglement in the sites where these were moored or fixed. Finally, port cities can render the labor of the urban masses visible that facilitated the making of steam age connectivity and a globality anchored in the urban space of the ports.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.