ArticlePublisher preview available

The Psychology of Gay Men’s Cuckolding Fantasies

Springer Nature
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Cuckolding (also known as troilism) is a sexual interest in which one obtains sexual arousal from the experience of a romantic partner engaging in sexual activity with someone else. The present study investigated fantasies about and experiences with cuckolding in a large and diverse sample of predominately gay-identified men (N = 580). Compared to previous research focusing on heterosexual men’s cuckolding fantasies, our results indicate that gay men’s cuckolding fantasies share many common elements; however, they differ in some important ways. Most notably, interracial and BDSM themes do not appear to be as common in gay men’s cuckolding fantasies as they are among heterosexual men. Our findings also indicate that frequent fantasies about cuckolding are linked to several overlapping sexual interests (e.g., voyeurism, group sex) and, further, the content of these fantasies is associated with a number of individual differences (e.g., agreeableness, sensation seeking, sociosexuality). Finally, this study also suggests that gay men who act on their cuckolding fantasies tend to report positive experiences; however, the likelihood of reporting positive outcomes appears to depend upon one’s personality and attachment style.
ORIGINAL PAPER
The Psychology of Gay Men’s Cuckolding Fantasies
Justin J. Lehmiller
1,2
David Ley
3
Dan Savage
4
Received: 2 March 2017 / Revised: 3 October 2017 / Accepted: 6 October 2017 / Published online: 28 December 2017
Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017
Abstract Cuckolding (also known as troilism) is a sexual interest
in which one obtains sexual arousal from the experience of a
romantic partner engaging in sexual activity with someone else.
The presentstudy investigatedfantasies about andexperiences
with cuckolding in a large and diverse sample of predominately
gay-identified men (N=580). Comparedto previous research
focusing on heterosexual men’s cuckolding fantasies, our results
indicate that gay men’s cuckolding fantasies share many com-
mon elements; however, they differ in some important ways.
Most notably, interracial and BDSM themes do not appear to
be as common in gay men’s cuckolding fantasies as they are
among heterosexual men. Our findings also indicate that fre-
quent fantasies about cuckoldingare linked to several overlap-
ping sexual interests (e.g., voyeurism, group sex) and, further, the
content of these fantasies is associated with a number of individ-
ual differences (e.g., agreeableness, sensation seeking, sociosex-
uality). Finally, this study also suggests that gay men who act on
their cuckolding fantasies tend to report positive experiences;
however, the likelihood of re porting positive outcomes appears
to depend upon one’s personality and attachment style.
Keywords Cuckolding Sexual fantasy Gay men
Consensual non-monogamy Troilism DSM-5
Introduction
Troilism is a little studied paraphilia described as the‘‘sharing of a
sexual partner with another person while one looks on, after which
the onlooker may or may not share the sexual partner’’(Smith, 1976,
p. 586).‘Cuckolding’ is the colloquial term for one contem-
porary form of troilism in which a man obtains sexu al arousal
from the sight or experience of his wife or girlfriend engaging
in sexual activity with another man. Whereas the term cuckold
historically referredto a man unknowingly married to an adul-
terous woman, the modern cuckold is aware that his wife is
having sex with other men and offers his consent and encour-
agement. This behavioris not a form of cheating; rather, it is a
variant of consensual non-monogamy (Rubin, Moors, Matsick,
Ziegler, & Conley, 2014). However, the practice and fantasy
of cuckolding are distinct from other forms of consensual non-
monogamy (e.g., swinging, open relationships), as well as the
practice of group sex,due to the cuckold takingon a submissive,
disempowered, and largely voyeuristic role in both the experi-
ence and fantasy. Those other practices tend to involve more
egalitarian sexual interactionsor mutual physical participation
by all parties, even if one partner is the center of attention.
An entire sexualsubculture has emerged that celebratesand
explores cuckolding fantasies. Ley (2009) interviewed dozens
of different-sex married couples that were practicing cuckold-
ing, mostof whom reported that it enhanced theirrelationships.
Ley’s work revealed several distinct characteristics and themes
of this subculture. First, the predominantly White participants
Ley interviewed commonly described the desired third party
in these scenarios—colloquially referred to as the‘bull’’—as
a man who is Black and has a large penis. Thus, these fantasies
often feature an interracial element. The bull’s semen tends to
be emphasized, too: the cuckold may be aroused by having
intercourse with his partner while another man’s semen is inside
her, or he may wish to participate in removal of the bull’s semen
&Justin J. Lehmiller
justin.lehmiller@gmail.com
1
Department of Counseling Psychology, Social Psychology, and
Counseling, Ball State University, Teacher’s College, Room
605, Muncie, IN 47306, USA
2
The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN,
USA
3
New Mexico Solutions, Albuquerque, NM, USA
4
The Stranger, Seattle, WA, USA
123
Arch Sex Behav (2018) 47:999–1013
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1096-0
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... 6. Cuckoldry -A concept associated with "controlled cheating," often with a fetishistic background. One partner engages in sexual activity with a third party, with the consent of the primary partner, who derives sexual arousal from the situation (in some cases, the primary partner observes the sexual act) [3,6]. 7. Relationship Anarchy -A perspective where the boundaries between friendship, romantic relationships, and sexual relationships are fluid. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction and objective: Consensual non-monogamy (CNM) refers to various relationship types in which at least one partner, with the other’s consent, forms sexual and/or emotional connections with other people. In open relationships, partners are allowed to engage sexually with others, but emotional intimacy is reserved for the primary relationship, which takes precedence. The aim of this article is to gather the most up-to-date information on open relationships.Material and methods: A review of studies available on the PubMed platform (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) was conducted, including articles with free full-text access that used the keywords: “open relationship”, “CNM” and "Consensual non-monogamy."Brief Description of the State of Knowledge: CNM includes open relationships, polyamory, polyfidelity, and swinging. Interest in open relationships has increased in recent years, with more people expressing curiosity about them than those actively participating. Men, individuals with high cognitive empathy, those less prone to jealousy, and those capable of experiencing compersion—the joy from a partner’s involvement with others—are particularly interested in open relationships. Summary: Research suggests potential benefits of CNM, including greater relationship and sexual satisfaction compared to monogamous arrangements. However, open relationships can also pose challenges such as social stigma, the potential breakdown of the primary relationship, or complications in parenting for those involved. Despite growing interest, CNM and phenomena like compersion remain under-researched, providing an open field for further investigation into their dynamics and impact on individual and relational well-being.
... Second, most research has treated CNM as a monolithic category, failing to distinguish between the forms these relationships can take, including polyamory, swinging, open relationships, and "cuckolding" (a variant of swinging that involves a relationship in which one partner watches or listens while their partner has sex with another person; Lehmiller et al., 2018). The result is that it is unclear which types of CNM are more versus less common. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Evolutionary social science is having a renaissance. This volume showcases the empirical and theoretical advancements produced by the evolutionary study of romantic relationships. The editors assembled an international collection of contributors to trace how evolved psychological mechanisms shape strategic computation and behavior across the life span of a romantic partnership. Each chapter provides an overview of historic and contemporary research on the psychological mechanisms and processes underlying the initiation, maintenance, and dissolution of romantic relationships. Contributors discuss popular and cutting-edge methods for data analysis and theory development, critically analyze the state of evolutionary relationship science, and provide discerning recommendations for future research. The handbook integrates a broad range of topics (e.g., partner preference and selection, competition and conflict, jealousy and mate guarding, parenting, partner loss and divorce, and post-relationship affiliation) that are discussed alongside major sources of strategic variation in mating behavior, such as sex and gender diversity, developmental life history, neuroendocrine processes, technological advancement, and culture. Its content promises to enrich students’ and established researchers’ views on the current state of the discipline and should challenge a diverse cross-section of relationship scholars and clinicians to incorporate evolutionary theorizing into their professional work.
... Studies on the relationship between sexual orientation and sexual fantasies are contradictory. If on the one hand, there are authors who concluded there are no differences in the frequency and content of sexual fantasies between homosexual and heterosexual men (Plaud & Bigwood, 1997), even pointing out the overlap of some fantasy contents (e.g., cuckolding) (Lehmiller, Ley, & Savage, 2018), on the other hand, further studies have inferred that homosexual men showed higher frequency levels in the categories of exploratory and impersonal than heterosexual men, while the latter reported a higher frequency of emotional-romantic content (Bhugra et al., 2006;Tortora, D'Urso et al., 2020). Lehmiller (2018), in his research, listed -among the "top 7 fantasies" of his total sample of 4.175 people -sexual fantasies that involved activities with someone of the same gender. ...
Article
Full-text available
Envisioning sexual fantasies as any image or mental settingthat is sexually exciting or erotic for the individual, the present work aims to study the nature of the relationship between sexual fantasies and gender, sexual orientation, and some of the different dimensions of psychological well-being, such as life satisfaction and satisfaction with sex life. The present study was developed through a sample of 569 participants, aged between 18 and 29 years old, obtained by completing a Sociodemographic Questionnaire, Wilson’s Sexual Fantasies Questionnaire, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Satisfaction with Sex Life Scale. The findings revealed that, although there are no statistically significant gender differences concerning the sex drive, there were differences in Exploratory content, favoring the male gender, and BDSM, emphasized by the female gender in comparison. The occurrence of cross-orientation fantasies was also verified, proving to be significant for the heterosexual group for the item “Being much sought after by the same-sex” with women reporting more frequently than men. There was also a significant mediation between Satisfaction with Life and Intimate Fantasies, through Satisfaction with Sex Life. These results reinforce the breadth that sexual fantasies have, both in areas closer to sexual expression (e.g., gender, sexual orientation) and in more peripheral areas (e.g., psychological well-being), proving that sexual fantasies – and their capacity for arousal – relate to one’s psychological well-being.
Chapter
This chapter explores how transgressions take place within the sex club. First, using a group sex encounter, it highlights the ways in which different forms of heteroeroticism can be understood as contesting the everyday routines of the club and broader notions of heteronormativity. Embedded within this section of the chapter is the notion of gaze and how this is a reversible process of looking and being looked at. The second part of this chapter focuses on sex between women. Whilst initially framing this as taking place within a heteropatriarchal gaze driven by forms of neo-liberal sexual entrepreneurialism, the chapter reflects on this approach by suggesting that it is within the limits of neo-liberalism where transgressive sexual practices might emerge. Finally, the chapter tentatively explores transgender experiences. In particular, it argues that transgression is not always a positive experience but can also result in sexual violence. The chapter concludes by arguing that where sexual practice exceeds economies of desire, it can be the source of intense sexual pleasure. At the same time, such transgressions can be physically and emotionally dangerous.
Chapter
This chapter explores how dark rooms within sex clubs shape and configure men and masculinities. Using interviews with men who have used and visited dark rooms, this chapter explores the erotic subjectivity of men. The starting point for this chapter is that the norms and values of the club that are embedded in the erotic hierarchies that circulate in the rest of the club help to define what happens in the dark room. The chapter by examining respectable masculinities then explores the same-sex practices between men and consent. The chapter then argues that by leaving behind a sexual performance based on masculinity, men in the dark room demonstrate an alternative way of configuring masculinity and sexuality. It is suggested as the chapter progresses that new forms of erotic configurations are assembled in the dark room that point to the possibilities of a post-masculinity. The chapter concludes by highlighting that sex clubs do have the possibility to produce a radical subjectivity that may signal an epistemological break with existing approaches to men and masculinity.
Chapter
This introductory chapter welcomes readers to the sex club. This chapter explains what the book is about and what readers should expect. The book then highlights the ethnographical research method that is used predominantly throughout the book. In so doing, it critically reflects on the limits of using ethnography to describe sexual encounters. The chapter then provides a synopsis of the chapters that are furnished with ethnographic encounters. Overall, this chapter provides an introductory insight into the sex clubs in the UK. The chapter concludes by describing the experience of the end of the night at a sex club and highlighting what we are yet to know about sex clubs.
Chapter
This chapter begins by framing sex clubs as a place of secrecy and discretion. It then begins to define what a sex club is, a potted history of sex clubs and their position within the law and planning permissions. The chapter then provides a short discussion of methodology, before moving on to provide information on who visits sex clubs, what their sexual preferences are and how we might think about sex clubs geographically. A number of key findings emerge from this chapter that include sex clubs are not simply places for swingers but are part of a more diverse range of erotic practices; it highlights how the majority of women visiting the club are likely to identify as bisexual or bi-curious; clubs are geographically located and clustered; it provides an understanding of the racial dynamics of those who attend clubs and begins to map out sexual practices with geographical locations. In summary, this chapter provides important background information behind sex clubs.
Chapter
The chapter focuses on the racialization of black men within sex clubs. It begins by recognizing the ways that clubs promote thematized events. Such events create a way of promoting fantasies that may lead to the satiating of desires. The chapter moves from discussing the commodification and fetishization of the body to considering how it is practiced within clubs. It discusses the notion of the ‘Black Bull’ and how black bodies become naturalized as through an appeal to animality. It is argued that this animality is historically located in the notions of black slavery. The chapter then explores how white women utilize this racialized desirability as a form of erotic consumption. The chapter argues that the role of women in black men’s slavery provides the contours for how they consume and commodify black bodies within the club. The chapter then moves on to discuss cuckolding and hotwifing and the implications this has for white masculinity. The chapter concludes by highlighting the role of racialized sex nights in clubs as a source of pleasure and agency for the men involved.
Article
Full-text available
Consensual non-monogamy (CNM) encompasses romantic relationships in which all partners agree that engaging in sexual and/or romantic relationships with other people is allowed and part of their relationship arrangement (Conley, Moors, Matsick & Ziegler, 2012). Previous research indicates that individuals who participate in CNM relationships are demographically homogenous (Sheff & Hammers, 2010; Sheff, 2005); however, we argue that this may be an artifact of community-based recruitment strategies that have created an inaccurate reflection of people who engage in CNM. To achieve a more nuanced understanding of the identities of individuals engaged in departures from monogamy, the present study provides a comparative analysis of descriptive statistics of those in CNM relationships and those in monogamous relationships. Using data from two large online samples, we examined the extent to which individuals with certain demographic variables (gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and age) are over- or under-represented in CNM and monogamous relationships. Overall, we aim to promote future research of CNM that is more inclusive of diverse identities.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Although consensually nonmonogamous (CNM) relationships are presumed to be far riskier for partners' sexual health compared with monogamous relationships, the disparity between them may be smaller than assumed. A growing body of research finds that many partners who have made monogamy agreements cheat, and when they do, they are less likely to practice safe sex than CNM partners. Aim: Extant comparisons of monogamous and CNM relationships are rare and have yet to establish whether rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and STI testing differ between these groups. The present research compared self-reported STI history, lifetime number of sex partners, and condom use practices among monogamous and CNM partners. Methods: Participants (N = 556) were recruited for an online survey of "attitudes toward sexual relationships." Approximately two-thirds of the sample reported current involvement in a monogamous relationship, with the remainder indicating involvement in a CNM relationship. Main outcome measures: All participants completed a questionnaire that included measures of condom use practices with primary and extra-pair partners, as well as their STI history. Results: CNM partners reported more lifetime sexual partners than individuals in monogamous relationships. In addition, compared with monogamous partners, CNM partners were more likely to (i) report using condoms during intercourse with their primary partner; (ii) report using condoms during intercourse with extradyadic partners; and (iii) report having been tested for STIs. Approximately one-quarter of monogamous partners reported sex outside of their primary relationship, most of whom indicated that their primary partner did not know about their infidelity. The percentage of participants reporting previous STI diagnoses did not differ across relationship type. Conclusions: CNM partners reported taking more precautions than those in monogamous relationships in terms of greater condom use during intercourse with all partners and a higher likelihood of STI testing. Thus, although persons in CNM relationships had more sexual partners, the precautions they took did not appear to elevate their rate of STIs above an imperfect implementation of monogamy. Lehmiller JJ. A comparison of sexual health history and practices among monogamous and consensually nonmonogamous sexual partners. J Sex Med **;**:**-**.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5), a sexual fantasy (SF) is paraphilic if it concerns activities outside the realm of "genital stimulation or preparatory fondling with phenotypically normal, physically mature, consenting human partners" (normophilic). Intensity of the paraphilic SF is also "greater than or equal to normophilic interests." Surprisingly, however, very few data are available to corroborate that definition of a paraphilic SF. Although the relatively high prevalence of paraphilic SF in the general population is well known, the magnitude of difference between intensity of "normophilic" and "paraphilic" SF remains to be assessed. Aim: The main goal of this study was to analyze the SF of adults recruited in the general population to obtain person profiles based on the nature and intensity of their SF. Methods: Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) were used with data collected from 1,501 adults recruited in the general population to generate subgroups of participants based on the nature and intensity of their SF. Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures used was a revised version of the Wilson Sex Fantasy Questionnaire. Results: When all participants are considered as a unique group, the mean intensity of the most intense "normophilic" SF (oral sex) is significantly higher than the mean intensity of the most intense "paraphilic" SF (being sexually dominated for women and watching two women having sex for men), as expected from the DSM-5. When clusters of participants are considered separately, however, conclusions are nuanced. Four significant clusters of participants (two predominantly female and two predominantly male) reported at least one paraphilic SF with intensity as high as that of their most intense "normophilic" SF. In fact, 57% of this sample met the criteria of paraphilia. Conclusion: These results suggest that the current criteria for paraphilia are too inclusive. Suggestions are given to improve the definition of pathological sexual interests, and the crucial difference between SF and sexual interest is underlined. Joyal CC. Defining "normophilic" and "paraphilic" sexual fantasies in a population-based sample: On the importance of considering subgroups. Sex Med 2015;3:321-330.
Article
Full-text available
IntroductionAlthough several theories and treatment plans use unusual sexual fantasies (SF) as a way to identify deviancy, they seldom describe how the fantasies referred to were determined to be unusual.AimThe main goal of this study was to determine which SF are rare, unusual, common, or typical from a statistical point of view among a relatively large sample of adults recruited from the general population. A secondary goal was to provide a statistical comparison of the nature and intensity of sexual fantasies for men and women. This study also aims at demonstrating with both quantitative and qualitative analyses that certain fantasies often considered to be unusual are common.Methods An Internet survey was conducted with 1,516 adults (799 ♀; 717 ♂) who ranked 55 different SF and wrote their own favorite SF. Each SF was rated as statistically rare (2.3% or less), unusual (15.9% or less), common (more than 50%), or typical (more than 84.1% of the sample).Main Outcome MeasuresAn extended version of the Wilson's Sex Fantasy Questionnaire with an open question.ResultsOnly two sexual fantasies were found to be rare for women or men, while nine others were unusual. Thirty sexual fantasies were common for one or both genders, and only five were typical. These results were confirmed with qualitative analyses. Submission and domination themes were not only common for both men and women, but they were also significantly related to each other. Moreover, the presence of a single submissive fantasy was a significant predictor of overall scores for all SF in both genders.Conclusion Care should be taken before labeling an SF as unusual, let alone deviant. It suggested that the focus should be on the effect of a sexual fantasy rather than its content. Joyal CC, Cossette A, and Lapierre V. What exactly is an unusual sexual fantasy? J Sex Med **;**:**–**.
Article
Full-text available
Behavioural ecologists view monogamy as a subtle mixture of conflict and cooperation between the sexes. In part, conflict and cooperation is cryptic, taking place within the female’s reproductive tract. In this paper the cryptic interaction for humans was analysed using data from both a nationwide survey and counts of sperm inseminated into, and ejected by, females. On average, 35% of sperm were ejected by the female within 30 min of insemination. The occurrence and timing of female orgasm in relation to copulation and male ejaculation influenced the number of sperm retained at both the current and next copulation. Orgasms that climaxed at any time between 1 min before the male ejaculated up to 45 min after led to a high level of sperm retention. Lack of climax or a climax more than 1 min before the male ejaculated led to a low level of sperm retention. Sperm from one copulation appeared to hinder the retention of sperm at the next copulation for up to 8 days. The efficiency of the block declined with time after copulation but was fixed at its current level by an inter-copulatory orgasm which thus reduced sperm retention at the next copulation. Inter-copulatory orgasms are either spontaneous ( = nocturnal) or induced by self-masturbation or stimulation by a partner. It is argued that orgasms generate a blow-suck mechanism that takes the contents of the upper vagina into the cervix. These contents include sperm and seminal fluid if present; acidic vaginal fluids if not. Inter-copulatory orgasms will therefore lower the pH of the cervical mucus and either kill or reduce the mobility of any sperm that attempt to penetrate from reservoirs in the cervical crypts. Intercopulatory orgasms may also serve an antibiotic function. Copulatory and inter-copulatory orgasms endow females with considerable flexibility in their manipulation of inseminates. The data suggest that, in
Article
Sexual selection is the mechanism that favors an increase in the frequency of alleles associated with reproduction (Darwin, 1871). Darwin distinguished sexual selection from natural selection, but today most evolutionary scientists combine the two concepts under the name, natural selection. Sexual selection is composed of intrasexual competition (competition between members of the same sex for sexual access to members of the opposite sex) and intersexual selection (differential mate choice of members of the opposite sex). Focusing mainly on precopulatory adaptations associated with intrasexual competition and intersexual selection, postcopulatory sexual selection was largely ignored even a century after the presentation of sexual selection theory. Parker (1970) was the first to recognize that male-male competition may continue even after the initiation of copulation when males compete for fertilizations. More recently, Thornhill (1983) and others (e.g. Eberhard, 1996) recognized that intersexual selection may also continue after the initiation of copulation when a female biases paternity between two or more males' sperm. The competition between males for fertilization of a single female's ova is known as sperm competition (Parker, 1970), and the selection of sperm from two or more males by a single female is known as cryptic female choice (Eberhard, 1996; Thornhill, 1983). Although sperm competition and cryptic female choice together compose postcopulatory sexual selection (see Table 6.1), sperm competition is often used in reference to both processes (e.g. Baker & Bellis, 1995; Birkhead & Moller, 1998; Simmons, 2001; Shackelford, Pound, & Goetz, 2005).