- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from International Journal of Primatology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Katherine T. Hanson
1
&Erin P. Riley
1
Received: 31 July 2017 / Accepted: 13 October 2017 / Published online: 27 December 2017
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017
Abstract Ethnoprimatology explores the ecological, social, and cultural interconnec-
tions between humans and other primates. Since the field’s emergence, researchers
have examined overlapping human–primate resource use and conflict, human–primate
disease transmission, primate folklore and its influence on conservation status, and
primate tourism. One facet of the human–primate interface that remains underexplored
from an ethnoprimatological perspective is habituation. Habituation—defined as when
wild animals accept a human observer as a neutral element of their environment—has
long been considered a critical first step for successful primate fieldwork. Although
primatologists have explored how to accomplish habituation, little attention has been
paid to habituation as a mutually modifying process that occurs between human
observers and their primate study subjects. By drawing on the ethnoprimatological
approach and engaging with perspectives from human–animal studies, this manuscript
examines habituation as a scientific and intersubjective process. Over seven months, we
documented behavioral changes in moor macaques (Macaca maura) and human
participants that occur during habituation. We also conducted interviews with re-
searchers and local field assistants to track perceptions of habituation progress. Inte-
grating ethological measures with ethnographic material enabled us to explore how and
why quantitative markers of habituation Bsuccess^differ from subjective impressions,
observe habituation—and primate fieldwork in general—as a bidirectional, intersub-
jective experience, and come to understand habituation as a dynamic spectrum of
tolerance rather than a state to be Bachieved.^Collectively, these findings have
important implications for future work in ethnoprimatology and habituation method-
ology, as well as the practice of primate fieldwork.
Int J Primatol (2018) 39:852–877
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-017-0009-3
Handling Editor: Joanna M. Setchell
*Katherine T. Hanson
kth621@gmail.com
1
Department of Anthropology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
Beyond Neutrality: the Human–Primate Interface
During the Habituation Process
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.