ArticlePDF Available

Nectar and pollen sources for honeybees in Kafrelsheikh of northern Egypt

Authors:
  • King Faisal University, ALHasa, Saudi Arabia

Abstract and Figures

This study was conducted at the apiary of the Beekeeping Research Section at the Sakha Agricultural Research Station, ARC, Kafrelsheikh, and other apiaries in Kafrelsheikh province, during two successive years 2015 and 2016. The study aimed to survey nectar and pollen floral resources in Kafrelsheikh province. Ninty seven plant species belonging to 33 families were recorded as nectar sources, and 82 plant species belonging to 36 families were recorded as pollen sources during the whole year. The largest amount of monthly trapped pollen was obtained during May followed by August. It can be concluded that, beekeepers in Kafrelsheikh province can harvest good honey yield at the end of blooming seasons of citrus (Citrus spp.) during March and April, Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) during May and June, loofah (Luffa aegyptiaca Mill.) during June to October, cotton (Gossypium spp.) during July and August, and banana (Musa spp.) during August and September. They also, could be trapping pollen loads collected from faba bean (Vicia faba L.) and flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) during January to March, date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) during March and April, Egyptian clover during May and June, summer seed watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. colothynthoides L.) during June and July, loofah and maize (Zea mays L.) during June to November.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Original article
Nectar and pollen sources for honeybees in Kafrelsheikh province of
northern Egypt
El-Kazafy A. Taha
a,b,
, Reda A. Taha
c
, Saad N. AL-Kahtani
b
a
Economic Entomology Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
b
Arid Land Agriculture Department, Faculty of Agriculture & Food Sciences, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
c
Honeybee Research Section, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
article info
Article history:
Received 13 October 2017
Revised 8 December 2017
Accepted 24 December 2017
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
Flora
Honeybee
Kafrelshiekh
Nectar
Pollen
abstract
This study was conducted at the apiary of the Beekeeping Research Section at the Sakha Agricultural
Research Station, ARC, Kafrelsheikh, and other apiaries in Kafrelsheikh province, during two successive
years 2015 and 2016. The study aimed to survey nectar and pollen floral resources in Kafrelsheikh pro-
vince. Ninty seven plant species belonging to 33 families were recorded as nectar sources, and 82 plant
species belonging to 36 families were recorded as pollen sources during the whole year. The largest
amount of monthly trapped pollen was obtained during May followed by August. It can be concluded
that, beekeepers in Kafrelsheikh province can harvest good honey yield at the end of blooming seasons
of citrus (Citrus spp.) during March and April, Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) during May
and June, loofah (Luffa aegyptiaca Mill.) during June to October, cotton (Gossypium spp.) during July
and August, and banana (Musa spp.) during August and September. They also, could be trapping pollen
loads collected from faba bean (Vicia faba L.) and flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) during January to March,
date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) during March and April, Egyptian clover during May and June, summer
seed watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. colothynthoides L.) during June and July, loofah and maize (Zea
mays L.) during June to November.
Ó2017 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access
article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
1. Introduction
The main honey flow seasons in Egypt are citrus during March
and April, Egyptian clover during April to June, and cotton during
July and August (Taha, 2005). In addition, two secondary honey
flow seasons: loofah during June to October (Taha et al., 2006),
and banana during August and September (Taha, 2007) were
recorded in Kafrelsheikh province. Long gaps in the availability of
bee floral resources between the flow seasons affect the growth
and productivity of bee colonies (Taha, 2000, 2005). During such
floral dearth periods, particularly when pollen is not available,
colonies gradually use up stored resources within the combs in
their nests, while the queens stop laying eggs and the colonies
become weak (Manning, 2008; Taha and Al-Kahtani, 2013). Such
colonies use up a major part of nectar and pollen collected directly
after the dearth for buildup of colony population. For beekeepers,
this process is destructive for their business. Honeybee colonies
should to be populous in order to store surplus nectar, which is
then harvested (Taha and Al-Kahtani, 2013). Beekeepers usually
provide their colonies with artificial feeding including sugar syrup
and pollen substitutes/supplements during dearth periods (Taha,
2015c). However, no artificial feeds have been found equivalent
to nectar and pollen (Mohanna, 1989). The knowledge on the
major floral resources lead beekeepers to maintain colony strength,
economize the cost of feeding, and harvest good honey yield (Carol,
1999; Taha, 2005, 2015a).
In tropical and sub-tropical areas, bee floral resources are avail-
able around the year, and the activity of honeybee colonies in gath-
ering nectar and/or pollen is continued throughout the year
(Neupane and Thapa, 2005). However, the foraging activities of
honeybees for pollen are greatly influenced by weather factors
and availability of pollen (Taha and Al-Kahtani, 2013; Taha,
2014). It is very useful for beekeepers to have a knowledge on nec-
tar and/or pollen floral resources in their areas, that’s could help
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.12.010
1319-562X/Ó2017 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Corresponding author at: Arid Land Agriculture Department, Faculty of
Agriculture & Food Sciences, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
E-mail address: etaha@kfu.edu.sa (E.-K.A. Taha).
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Production and hosting by Elsevier
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences xxx (2017) xxx–xxx
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
journal homepage: www.sciencedirect.com
Please cite this article in press as: Taha, E.-K.A., et al. Nectar and pollen sources for honeybees in Kafrelsheikh province of northern Egypt. Saudi Journal of
Biological Sciences (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.12.010
them to plan for managing their colonies, and they may be decided
to move it to another area rich with nectar and pollen floral
resources during certain periods to have good honey yield, produc-
ing bee swarms, or queen production (Taha, 2005, 2015a).
Studies on nectar and/or pollen plants for honeybees were con-
ducted in Brazil (Luz and Barth, 2012); in Costa Rica (Freitas,
1994); in Bulgaria (Atanassova and Lazarova, 2010); in Egypt
(Taha, 2000; Helal et al., 2003; Fathy, 2008; Ismail et al., 2013;
Abou-Shaara, 2015; Esmael et al., 2016); in Germany (Köppler
et al., 2007; Beil et al., 2008); in India (Singh, 2003); in Iran
(Mossadegh, 1990); in Italy (Fortunato et al., 2006); in Mexico
(Villanueva, 1989); in Nibal (Paudayal and Gautam, 2011); in Nige-
ria (Dukku, 2003); in Palestine (Reyahi, 1999); in Philippines
(Payawal et al., 1991); in Poland (Wróblewska et al., 2010); in
Saudi Arabia (Taha, 2013, 2015a,b; Taha et al., 2016; Adgaba
et al., 2017, Al-Kahtani et al., 2017; Taha et al., 2017); in Spain
(Seijo et al., 1994); in Turkey (Bilisik et al. 2008); in USA (Baum
et al., 2011).
The present study aimed to survey major and minor sources of
nectar and/or pollen for honeybees in Kaferelsheikh province,
northern Egypt throughout the year. The second goal was to throw
the light on the periods in which beekeepers can harvesting honey
yield, and/or trapping pollen loads collected from the major
sources.
2. Materials and method
The present study was carried out at the apiary of the Beekeep-
ing Research Section at Sakha Agricultural Research Station, ARC,
Kafrelsheikh, and other apiaries in Kafrelsheikh province, northern
Egypt throughout two successive years, from January 2015 to
December 2016. Kafrelsheikh lies at latitude 31°06
0
42
00
N and longi-
tude 30°56
0
45
00
E at an altitude of 17 m above sea level. It comprises
10 cities: Metoubes, Sidi Salem, Fuwwah, Desouk, Qallin, Kafrel-
sheikh, El-Reyad, Beila, El-Hamool, and Baltim.
Fresh flowers were collected from the plants as buds before
anthesis, and reference slides were prepared according to
Louveaux et al. (1978). The anthers were washed out 3 times in a
watch glass filled with ether and then were dried. The pollen grains
were transferred to a slide and spread out. A drop of fructose solu-
tion (20 g fructose + 0.5 g crystallized phenol in 100 ml of distilled
water) was added to facilitate the transferring, and accelerate the
swelling of the pollen grains. The preparation was dried on a
warming plate at 40 °C and mounted with glycerine gelatine. This
procedure was done for the pollen grains of each plant species. The
prepared reference slides were stored in a refrigerator.
Five colonies (each 10 combs) of hybrid Carniolan (Apis mellifera
carnica Pollmann) honeybees were selected in each city to study
the fluctuation of collected bee-pollen throughout the year in
Kaferelsheikh province. All colonies were approximately in the
same strength (brood combs, stored food, and adult bee popula-
tion). Pollen traps with efficiency of 25% were fitted on the
entrance of the hives in each city. Pollen loads were collected from
pollen traps every two days. Pollen loads were dried at room tem-
perature in a shady place for two hrs to make the separation easy.
The pollen loads were hand-sorted according to their color and
appearance, then referred to their sources, and were weighted
using an electrical balance. Microscopical examinations were con-
ducted to identify the floral origin of pollen grains according to
their shape and size by comparing with the previously prepared
reference pollen slide.
Recording of all plant species which were observed to be visited
by honeybee workers was done throughout the year in the ten
regions represented Kaferelsheikh province. Unidentified plant
species were collected, transferred to the laboratory, then were
identified and recorded. Each source was identified by its scientific
name and botanical family. Average date of the blooming period of
each plant and the value for bees as a source of nectar and/or pol-
len were recorded.
Data were statistically analyzed by the analysis of variance
(ANOVA) using PROC GLM ver. 9.1.3 SAS
Ò
software computer pro-
gram (SAS Institute, 2003). Means of monthly collected bee-pollen
were compared using Least Significant Difference (LSD) tests (
a
:
0.05).
3. Results
Data listed in Table 1 showed that 110 plant species belonging
to 39 plant families were recorded as pollen and/or nectar floral
resources in Kafrelshiekh province throughout 2015 and 2016.
Ninty seven plant species belonging to 33 families were recorded
as nectar sources and 82 plant species belonging to 36 families
were recorded as pollen sources during the whole year. The most
important species for honeybees in Kafrelshiekh province were
faba bean (Vicia faba L.), flax (Linum usitatissimum L.), peach (Prunus
persica L.) citrus (Citrus spp.), date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.),
Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.), guava (Psidium guajava
L.), summer seed watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. colothynthoides
L.), loofah (Luffa aegyptiaca Mill.), maize (Zea mays L.), cotton
(Gossypium spp.), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), banana (Musa
spp.). The highest numbers (64 spp.) of blooming species were
recorded during March, while the lowest numbers (7 spp.) were
recorded during January.
As shown in Table 2 faba bean, Egyptian clover, summer seed
watermelon, and cotton were recorded as major nectar floral
resources in all regions of Kafrelshiekh province. Faba bean, Egyp-
tian clover, summer seed watermelon, and maize were recorded as
major pollen floral resources in all regions of Kafrelshiekh pro-
vince. Citrus was recorded as a major nectar, and minor pollen flo-
ral resource in Metoubes, Fuwwah, and Desouk regions. Banana
was recorded as a honey plant in Fuwwah, and Desouk regions.
Loofah was recorded as a major floral resource of nectar and pollen
in Metoubes region. In Metoubes and Baltim regions, guava was
recorded as a major nectar and pollen floral resource, while date
palm was recorded as a major pollen floral resource. Sunflower
was recorded as a major source of nectar and pollen in Sidi Salem,
Qallin and Kafrelsheikh regions, and as a minor source in the others
regions.
The average yearly amounts of collected bee-pollen were 2.866
and 2.780 kg/colony in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Significant
(P < .01) variations were found among amounts of trapped
pollen loads during months throughout the year. The largest
amounts of collected bee-pollen were obtained during May
(440.77 and 425.33 g/colony), followed by August (327.73 and
335.62 g/colony), then March (305.33 and 284.80 g/colony), while
the lowest amounts of trapped pollen loads were obtained during
January (131.92 and 115.66 g/colony), followed by December
(136.36 and 125.65 g/colony) in 2015 and 2016, respectively
(Fig. 1).
4. Discussion
The survey of bee plants in Kafrelshiekh province showed that
110 plant species were visited by honeybees (A. mellifera L.);
worker bees can collect nectar from 97 species, and can collect pol-
len from 82 floral resources during the whole year. Previous stud-
ies in Egypt showed that, there were 39 bee forages belonging to
15 families in Kafrelshiekh region (Taha, 2005), 26 pollen species
in 15 families in Dakahlia (Fathy, 2008), 24 pollen sources belong-
ing to 16 families at Fayoum (Ismail et al., 2013), and 65 bee plants
2E.-K.A. Taha et al. / Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences xxx (2017) xxx–xxx
Please cite this article in press as: Taha, E.-K.A., et al. Nectar and pollen sources for honeybees in Kafrelsheikh province of northern Egypt. Saudi Journal of
Biological Sciences (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.12.010
Table 1
Nectar and pollen floral resources in Kafrelsheikh province during 2015 and 2016 years.
Latin name Common name Family Flowering period Source
Nectar Pollen
1Vicia faba L. Faba bean Fabaceae January–March ++ ++
2Lupinus albus L. White lupin Fabaceae January–March + +
3Trigonella foenum-graecum L. Fenugreek Fabaceae January–March + +
4Linum usitatissimum L. Flax Linaceae January–March ++ ++
5Ocimum spp. Basil Lamiaceae January–Decmber + +
6Prunus persica L. Peach Rosaceae Febraury–March ++ ++
7Prunus armeniaca L. Apricot Rosaceae Febraury–March + +
8Anagallis arvensis L. Scarlet pimpernel Myrsinaceae Febraury–March + +
9Citrus limon (L.) Osbeck Eureka lemon Rotaceae Febraury–March + +
10 Citrus aurantiifolia Swingle Key lime Rotaceae Febraury–March + +
11 Citrus latifolia (Yu.Tanaka) Tanaka Persian Lime Rotaceae Febraury–March + +
12 Pisum sativum L. Pea Fabaceae February–March + +
13 Avena fatua L. Wild oat. Poaceae February–March +
14 Setaria viridis (L.) P.Beauv Green foxtail Poaceae February–March +
15 Sisumbrium irio L. Thumble mustard Brassicaceae February–April + +
16 Raphanus sativus L. Radish Brassicaceae February–April + +
17 Eruca sativa Mill. Rocket Brassicaceae February–April + +
18 Melilotus siculus All. Yellow sweet clover Fabaceae February–April +
19 Melilotus indicus All. Sour clover Fabaceae February–April +
20 Medicago hispida Gaertn. Bur clover Fabaceae February–April +
21 Malus domestica Borkh. nom. illeg. Apple Rosaceae February–April + +
22 Salex safsaf Forssk Egyptian willow Salicaceae February–April +
23 Casuarina equisetifolia L. Casuarina Casuarinaceae February–April +
24 Persea americana Mill. Avocado Lauraceae February–April + +
25 Anethum graveolens L. Dill Asteraceae February–May + +
26 Petroselenum crispum Mill. Parsley Asteraceae February–May + +
27 Senecio vulgaris L. Groundsel Asteraceae February–May + +
28 Malva sylvestris L. High mallow Malvaceae February–May + +
29 Ricinus communis L.Castor bean Euphorbiaceae February–May + +
30 Coriandrum sativum L.Coriander Apiaceae February–October + +
31 Barasica oleracea var.capitata L. Cabbage Brassicaceae February–April + +
32 Barasica rapa L. Turnip Brassicaceae February–April + +
33 Barasica napus L. Rape Brassicaceae February–April + +
34 Barasica nigra Koch Wild mustard Brassicaceae March–May + +
35 Pyrus malus L. Apple Rosaceae March–April + +
36 Pyrus communis L. Pear Rosaceae March–April + +
37 Citrus sinensis Osbeck Orange Rotaceae March–April ++ +
38 Citrus reticulata Blanco Mandarin orange Rotaceae March–April ++ +
39 Citrus aurantium Linn Sour orange Rotaceae March–April + +
40 Phoenix dactylifera L. Date palm Arecaceae March–April ++
41 Mangifera indica L. Mango Anacardiaceae March–April + +
42 Punica granatum L. Pomegranate Lythraceae March–April + +
43 Papaver rhoeas L. Common poppy Papaveraceae March–April + +
44 Borago officinalis L. Borage Boraginaceae March–April + +
45 Matricaria chamomilla L. Chamomile Asteraceae March–April + +
46 Rosmarinus officinalis L. Rosemary Lamiaceae March–April + +
47 Emex spinosus L. Devil’s thorn Polygonaceae March–April + +
48 Oxalis griffithii Edgew. & Hook. Pink doubl flower Oxalidaceae March–April + +
49 Hordeum murinum L. Wall barley Poaceae March–April +
50 Urtica urens L. Nettle Urticaceae March–April + +
51 Lolium multiflorum Lam. Ryegrass Poaceae March–April +
52 Nerium oleander L. Nerium Apocynaceae March–April + +
53 Silybum marianum L. Star-thistle Asteraceae March–May + +
54 Morus alba L. White mulberry Moraceae March–May + +
55 Morus nigra L. Mulberry Moraceae March–May + +
56 Alcea rosea L. Hollyhock Malvaceae March–September +
57 Convolvulus arvensis L. Field Bindweed Convolvulaceae March–October + +
58 Libbia nodiflora L. Lebya Verbenaceae March–October + +
59 Petunia spp. Petunia Solanaceae March–October + +
60 Solanum lycopersicum L. Tomato Solanaceae March–December + +
61 Solanum melongena L. Eggplant Solanaceae March–December + +
62 Capsicum annuum L.Chili pepper Solanaceae March–December + +
63 Capsicum annuum var. glabriusculum Dunal Chiltepin Solanaceae March–December + +
64 Zantedeschia aethiopica (L.) Spreng. Arum lily Araceae April–May + +
65 Albizia julibrissin Durazz Pink siris Fabaceae April–May + +
66 Melaleuca viminalis (Sol. ex Gaertn.) Byrnes Weeping bottlebrush Myrtaceae April–May + +
67 Acacia saligna (Labill.) H.L. Wendl Coojong Fabaceae April–May + +
68 Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip. Feverfew Asteraceae April–May + +
69 Olea europaea L. Olive Oleaceae April–May + +
70 Euphorbia milii Des Moul Christ thorn Euphorbiaciae April–May + +
71 Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. Barbary fig Cactaceae April–May + +
72 Cucumis melo var. cantalupensis Naudin Cantaloupe Cucurbitaceae April–May + +
73 Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai Watermelon Cucurbitaceae April–May ++ ++
(continued on next page)
E.-K.A. Taha et al. / Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences xxx (2017) xxx–xxx 3
Please cite this article in press as: Taha, E.-K.A., et al. Nectar and pollen sources for honeybees in Kafrelsheikh province of northern Egypt. Saudi Journal of
Biological Sciences (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.12.010
belonging to 25 plant families in Alexandria and El-Beheira pro-
vinces (Esmael et al., 2016). In India, more than 60 plant species
were visited by A. cerana, five species were potential sources of
nectar and five species were sources for pollen (Nehru et al.,
1988). In Iran, 173 bee plants belonging to 32 families were
recorded; 89 plants produce surplus honey and 28 species as major
pollen sources (Mossadegh, 1990). In Mexico, 102 plant species
were visited by the bees (Villanueva, 1989). In Saudi Arabia, 79
bee plant species belonging to 24 botanical families were recorded
as nectar and/or pollen sources in Al-Ahsa province (Taha, 2015a),
meanwhile 182 species from 49 plant families were identified as
bee forages in Al-Baha region (Adgaba et al., 2017).
Of the total 110 species were recorded, 76 (69.10%) were herbs,
29 (26.36%) trees, and 5 (4.54%) shrubs. The main 5 sources of
honey were classified as 3 herbs (T. alexdrinum,L. aegyptiaca, and
Gossypium spp.) and two trees (Citrus spp., and Musa spp.). Mean-
while, all major pollen floral resources were classified as herbs
except for date palm, guava and peach were trees. All major floral
resources of nectar and/or pollen were cultivated plants. Similar
results were reported by Taha (2000, 2005), Fathy (2008), Ismail
Table 1 (continued)
Latin name Common name Family Flowering period Source
Nectar Pollen
74 Ammi visnaga L. Tooth pick Asteraceae April–May + +
75 Cichorium intybus L. Chicory Asteraceae April–May + +
76 Trifolium alexandrinum L. Egyptian clover Fabaceae April–June ++ ++
77 Cucurbita pepo Thunb Squash Cucurbitaceae April–September + +
78 Portulaca oleracea L. Purslane Portulacaceae April–October +
79 Pluchea dioscoridis (L.) DC. Camphorweeds Asteraceae April–October + +
80 Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. Chinese hibiscus Malvaceae May–June +
81 Ammi spp. Celery Apiaceae May–June + +
82 Malvaviscus arboreus Cav. Sleeping hibiscus Malvaceae May–June +
83 Carduus acanthoides L. Welted thistle Asteraceae May–June + +
84 Pelargonium zonale (L.) L’Hér. ex Aiton Horse-shoe pelargonium Geraniaceae May–June + +
85 Delonix regia (Boj. ex Hook.) Raf Royal poinciana Fabaceae May–June + +
86 Aptenia cordifolia (L.f.) N.E.Br Baby sun rose Aizoaceae May–June + +
87 Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit White leadtree Fabaceae May–June + +
88 Cichorium pumilum Gacq Willd chicory Asteraceae May–June + +
89 Psidium guajava L. Guava Myrtaceae May–July + ++
90 Ipomoea carnea Jace. Pink morning glory Convolvulaceae May–December +
91 Citrullus lanatus var. colothynthoides L. Summer seed watermelon Cucurbitaceae June–July + ++
92 Duranta spp. Duranta Verbenaceae June–August + +
93 Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench Okra Malvaceae June–September +
94 Cucumis sativus L. Cucmber Cucurbutaceae June–October + +
95 Luffa aegyptiaca Mill. Loofah Cucurbitaceae June–November ++ ++
96 Zea mays L. Maize or corn Poaceae June–November ++
97 Gossypium spp. Cotton Malvaceae July–August ++
98 Origanum majorana L. Marjoram Lamiaceae July–August + +
99 Hibiscus canabinus L. Kenaf Malvaceae July–August +
100 Helianthus annuus L. Sunflower Asteraceae July–August ++ ++
101 Sesamum indicum L. Sesame Pedaliaceae July–August ++ ++
102 Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Cowpea Fabaceae July–August + +
103 Musa spp. Bananas Musaceae August–September ++
104 Oryza sativa L. Rice Poaceae August–September +
105 Schinus terebinthifolius Radd. Brazilian pepper Anacardiaceae September–October + +
106 Phaseolus vulgaris L. Bean Fabaceae September–October + +
107 Pisum sativum L. Pea Fabaceae October–January + +
108 Eucalyptus globulus Labill Eucalyptus Myrtaceae October–April + +
109 Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl. Loquate Rosaceae November–December + +
110 Tecoma stans (L.) Juss.ex Kunth Trumpet flower Bignoniaceae November–December + +
++
Major source.
+
Minor source.
Not source.
Table 2
Major nectar and/or pollen floral resources in Kafrelsheikh province in 2015 and 2016.
Floral resources Metoubes Sidi Salem Fuwwah Desouk Qallin Kafrelsheikh El-Reyad Beila El-Hamool Baltim
Citrus ++ ++ ++    ++
Egyptian clover ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
Loofah ++ + + + + + + + + +
Cotton
N
++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ +
Banana
N
+ + ++ ++ + + + + + +
Faba bean ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
Flax + ++ ++ + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
Peach ++ ++ ++   
Date palm
P
++ + + + + + + + + ++
Guava ++ + + + + + + + + ++
Summer seed watermelon ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ + ++
Sunflower + ++ + + ++ ++ + + + +
Maize
P
++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
Watermelon + + + + + + + + + ++
++
Major source.
+
Minor source.
Not source.
N
Source for nectar not for pollen,
P
Source for pollen not for nectar.
4E.-K.A. Taha et al. / Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences xxx (2017) xxx–xxx
Please cite this article in press as: Taha, E.-K.A., et al. Nectar and pollen sources for honeybees in Kafrelsheikh province of northern Egypt. Saudi Journal of
Biological Sciences (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.12.010
et al. (2013), Esmael et al. (2016) in Egypt, and Taha (2015a) in the
Al-Ahsa oasis of eastern Saudi Arabia. Kafrelsheikh is an Agricul-
tural province, that’s could explains why all of major floral
resources of nectar and/or pollen in this province were classified
as cultivated plants. There were some wild plants visited by bees,
but non of them is major source either of nectar or pollen.
Of the total 110 species were recorded as bee plants only five
species (Citrus spp., T. alexdrinum,L. aegyptiaca,Gossypium spp.,
and Musa spp.) represented 4.55% of the identified plants produced
surplus honey in Kafrelsheikh province. This percentage is higher
than that (3.30%) for bee plants in Al-Baha region (Adgaba et al.,
2017), and that (3.80%) in Al-Ahsa province (Taha, 2015a) in Saudi
Arabia, and that (1.6%) of world bee plants (Crane, 1990), while our
percentage is too low compared with that (51.44%) of Villanueva
(1989) in Iran. Beekeepers in Kafrelsheikh province usually harvest
honey yield during the blooming seasons of Citrus spp., T. alex-
drinum and Gossypium spp. (Taha, 2000, 2005), L. aegyptiaca
(Taha et al., 2006) and Musa spp. (Taha, 2007). In Saudi Arabia,
Medicago sativa L., Ziziphus spp. and Citrus spp. were the dominant
sources of nectar, while Cucurbita pepo Thunb, Ph. dactylifera L.,
Helianthus annuus L., M. sativa L. and Brassica napus L. were the
main sources of pollen in Al-Ahsa province (Taha, 2015a,b).
Besides, the major sources of nectar in Al-Baha region were Z.
spina-christi L., Acacia tortilis (Forssk) Hayne, A. asak,Lavandula den-
tata L., and Hypoestes forskaolii (Adgaba et al., 2017). In USA, 7 bee
plants non-Lamiaceae and nine Lamiaceae species were recorded
as nectar-producing plants (Widrlechner and Senechal, 1992).
Faba bean and flax were bloomed during the period from Jan-
uary to March in most parts of Kafrelshiekh province. Their flowers
were produced much pollen and nectar. The extra-floral nectaries
of faba bean were produced nectar before flowering starts and this
continues through and to the end of flowering (Kirk, 2004). Peach
was bloomed during early spring, and honeybees were collected
nectar and pollen from flowers. These plants did not produce sur-
plus honey, but they are very important for building up the colo-
nies and swarms production. Date palm was flowered during
March and April, male trees produced more pollen. It considered
an important source of pollen in Metoubes (Taha, 2005) and Baltim
regions. Summer seed watermelon was bloomed during a dearth
period between Egyptian clover and cotton flow seasons so, it
was served on maintaining the colony strength and economizing
the cost of feeding during this period (Taha and Bayomi, 2009).
Guava was bloomed from May to July and considered good source
of nectar and pollen in Metoubes and Baltim regions. Sunflower
and sesame were bloomed during July and August. They were good
sources of nctare and pollen during this period. These results are in
lin with the findings of Hussein et al. (1992) in Assiut, Taha (2000,
2005) in Kafrelshiekh, Fathy (2008) in Dakahlia, Ismail et al. (2013)
in Fayoum, Esmael et al. (2016) in Alexandria and El-Beheira
provinces.
The number of available bee plants throughout the months of
the year could be arranged in a descending order: March
and April > May > February > June > July and August > September >
October > November > December > January. Seven nectar and
pollen floral resources were bloomed during January; faba bean
and flax were the most important plants for honeybees. During
February, 34 pollen and 27 nectar floral resources were recorded;
faba bean, flax, and peach were the most beneficial plants for
honeybees in this period. Sixty-four bee forage plants were
recorded during March and April. The most important sources
during March were citrus, faba bean, date palm, peach, and flax.
Similar results were recorded by Hussein et al. (1992) in Assiut
province, and by Taha (2005) in Kafrelshiekh province. Unfortu-
nately, most of the bloomed plants in April were dried before
mid-April. Citrus was the predominant bee flora in April. These
results confirmed the findings of Taha (2005). During May, 46
nectar and pollen floral resources were recorded; Egyptian clover
was recorded as a major nectar and pollen floral resource. These
results are in agreement with those obtained by Hussein et al.
(1992) in Assiut, Esmael et al. (2016) in El-Beheira, and Taha
(2005) in Kafrelshiekh province. During June, 33 pollen and/or nec-
tar floral resources were recorded. The most abundant species
were Egyptian clover, guava, and loofah. Twenty-nine pollen and/
or nectar floral resources were recorded throughout July and
August; the most abundant species were watermelon, guava,
loofah, cotton, banana, sunflower, and maize. These results are in
harmony with those obtained by Hussein et al. (1992) in Assiut,
and Taha (2005) in Kafrelshiekh province. Twenty-two bee forage
plants were recorded during September; loofah, and maize were
the most important species. Nineteen taxa were bloomed in
October; loofah, and maize were the major sources in this period.
Although, 12 plant species flowered in November, and 10 plants
in December, it considered dearth period because all of these
plants are minor sources of nectar and/or pollen.
The most represented families were Fabaceae (15 spp.), Aster-
aceae (12 spp.), Brassicaceae and Malvaceae (7 spp.), Cucur-
bitaceae, Poaceae, Rosaceae and Rutaceae (6 spp.), and
solanaceae (5 spp.). They contributed by 63.64% of total bee flora
in Kafrelshiekh province. These results are in agreement with those
obtained by Zoratti et al. (1995) in Italy, Taha (2005) and Esmael
et al. (2016) in Egypt, and Taha (2015a) and Adgaba et al. (2017)
in Saudi Arabia, they reported that the most represented families
were Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Fabaceae, Rosaceae.
Besids, the most abundant species in Nigerian honey samples were
from Asteraceae and Arecaceae (Adekanmbi and Ogundipe, 2009).
Apiaceae, Lamiaceae, and Myrtaceae were represented by 3 spp.
The following families: Anacardiaceae, Convolvulaceae, Euphor-
biaceae, Moraceae, and Verbenaceae each was represented by
two plant species. Moreover, 22 families (Arecaceae, Aizoaceae,
Apocynaceae, Araceae, Bignoniaceae, Boraginaceae, Cactaceae,
Casuarinaceae, Geraniaceae, Lauraceae, Linaceae, Lythraceae,
Musaceae, Myrsinaceae, Papaveraceae, Pedaliaceae, Polygonaceae,
Portulacaceae, Oleaceae, Oxalidaceae, Salicaceae, and Urticaceae)
were represented by one nectar and/or pollen floral resource.
The monthly weight of trapped pollen loads reflects the activity
of honeybee colonies in gathering pollen. Pollen collection is a
continuous prosses throughout the year. The colonies started
their activities in pollen collection during January, then significant
(P < .01) increasing occurred during February and reached the first
peak during March. Decreasing in pollen collection occurred during
April, then increased significantly (P < .01) and formed the second
and the major peak during May coincieded with the flowering
period of Egyptian clover, then significant (P < .01) decrease
occurred during June. Gradually increase occurred during July,
and formed the third peak in August, then gradually and signifi-
cantly (P < .01) decrease occurred from September to December.
Fig. 1. Seasonal fluctuation of collected bee-pollen in Kafrelsheikh province during
2015 and 2016.
E.-K.A. Taha et al. / Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences xxx (2017) xxx–xxx 5
Please cite this article in press as: Taha, E.-K.A., et al. Nectar and pollen sources for honeybees in Kafrelsheikh province of northern Egypt. Saudi Journal of
Biological Sciences (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.12.010
These results are confirmed by the findings of Shawer (1987),
Fathy (1996), Shawer et al. (2003), Taha (2005) in Egypt, Taha
and Al-Kahtani (2017) in Saudi Arabia, and Al-Humyarie et al.
(1999) in Yemen who recorded the maximum area of stored pollen
during May. Besides, Sattigi and Lingappa (1993) found the
maximum area of stored pollen during March in India. Three peaks
of pollen collection were recorded during March, May and August
in the Al-Ahsa oasis of eastern Saudi Arabia (Taha and Al-Kahtani,
2013, 2017; Taha, 2014, 2015a). On contrary, the maximum area of
stored pollen was recorded during September in the Island of
Hawaii (Arita and Fujii, 1992). April considered a dearth period
in Kafrelsheikh province because of the shortage of pollen and
nectar floral resources, as a result of dried of most flowering plants
after a short time in April. The decline in pollen collecting during
April was recorded in Saudi Arabia (Taha, 2014, Taha and
Al-Kahtani, 2017) due to the presence of bee-eater (Merops spp.)
birds in the apiary area (Ali and Taha, 2012). The lowest amount
of collected bee-pollen was trapped during January, this may be
related to the low number of flowering plants during this period.
Similar results were obtained by Khanbash and Bin Ghodel
(1994) in Yemen, and Taha (2014, 2015a) in the Al-Ahsa oasis of
eastern Saudi Arabia.
5. Conclusion
Based on the present data, it can be concluded that beekeepers
at Kafrelsheikh province can obtain high honey yield, during the
blooming seasons of citrus (March and April), Egyptian clover
(April to June), loofah (June to October), cotton (July and August),
and banana (August and September). They can trap pollen loads
during the flowering periods of faba bean (January to March),
Egyptian clover (April to June), summer seed watermelon (June
and July), loofah (June to October), and maize (June to November).
References
Abou-Shaara, H.F., 2015. Potential honeybee plants of Egypt. Cerceta
˘ri Agronomice
în Moldova 48, 99–108.
Adekanmbi, O., Ogundipe, O., 2009. Nectar sources for the honeybee (Apis mellifera
adansonii) revealed by pollen content. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici
Cluj-Napoca 37, 211–217.
Adgaba, N., Alghamdi, A., Sammoud, R., Shenkute, A., Tadesse, Y., Ansari, M.J.,
Sharma, D., Hepburn, C., 2017. Determining spatio-temporal distribution of bee
forage species of Al-Baha region based on ground inventorying supported with
GIS applications and Remote Sensed Satellite Image analysis. Saudi J. Biol. Sci.
24, 1048–1055.
Al-Humyari, A.A., El-Sherif, M.E., Naser, Kh.S.A., 1999. Brood rearing, food storage
and worker longevity of Yemeni bee colonies and their Carniolan hybrid. J.
Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 24, 1345–1358.
Ali, M.A., Taha, E.A., 2012. Bee-eating birds (Coraciiformes: Meropidae) reduce
virgin honeybee queen survival during mating flights and foraging activity of
honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Inter. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 3, 1–8.
Al-Kahtani, S.N., Taha, E.A., Al-Abdulsalam, M., 2017. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)
seed yield in relation to phosphorus fertilization and honeybee pollination.
Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 24, 1051–1055.
Arita, L.H., Fujii, J.K., 1992. Quantity and seasonal variation of pollen types collected
by honeybees at two localities on the island of Hawaii. Proc. Hawaiian Entomol.
Soc. 31, 119–123.
Atanassova, J., Lazarova, M., 2010. Pollen analysis of bee pollen loads from the
region of town Shumen (NE Bulgaria). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie Bulgare
des Sciences 63, 369–374.
Baum, K.A., Rubink, W.L., Coulson, R.N., Bryant, J.R., Vaughn, M., 2011. Diurnal
patterns of pollen collection by feral honeybee colonies in Texas, USA.
Palynology 35, 85–93.
Beil, M., Horn, H., Schwabe, A., 2008. Analysis of pollen loads in a wild bee
community (Hymenoptera: Apidae)- a method for elucidating habitat use and
foraging distances. Apidologie 39, 456–467.
Bilisik, A., Cakmak, I., Bicakci, A., Malyer, H., 2008. Seasonal variation of collected
pollen loads of honeybees (Apismellifera L.anatoliaca). Grana 47, 70–77.
Crane, E., 1990. Bees and beekeeping: Science, practice and world resources. Oxford
Heinemann Newnes.
Carol, G., 1999. Wind pollination and reproductive assurance in Linanthus
parviflorus (Polemoniaceae). Amer. J. Biol. 86, 948–954.
Dukku, U.H., 2003. Acacia ataxacantha: a nectar plant for honeybees between two
dearth periods in the sudan savanna of northern Nigeria. Bee World 84, 32–33.
Esmael, M.E., Salem, M.H., Mahgoub, M.S., El-Barbary, N.S., 2016. Photographer
guide of pollen grains collected from apiaries in Alexandria and El-Beheira
Governorates (West Nile Delta, Egypt). Alex. J. Agric. Sci. 61, 267–290.
Fathy, D.M., 2008. Types and quantities of pollen grains collected by honeybee Apis
mellifera L. with reference to brood rearing activity Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis.
Fac. Agric., Mansoura Univ., Egypt.
Fathy, H.M., 1996. Honeybee colony population in relation to brood rearing and
stored pollen. Apiacta 31, 36–44.
Fortunato, L., Gazziola, F., Barbattini, R., 2006. A study on the pollen sources for
honeybees in Udine province (northern Italy). Bull. Insectol. 59, 39–43.
Freitas, B.M., 1994. Pollen identification of pollen and nectar loads collected by
Africanized honeybees in the state of Ceara, Brazil. In: Proc. 5th Inter. Conf. Apic.
Tropical Climates, Trinidad and Tobago, 7–12 Sep, pp. 73–79.
Helal, R.M., El-Dakhakhni, T.N., Shawer, M.B., Taha, E.A., 2003. Effect of moving the
apiaries on activity of honeybee colonies. 2-Flight activity, gathering of nectar
and sugar concentration contents and honey. J. Agric. Res. Tanta Univ. 29, 268–
282.
Hussein, M.H., Mannaa, S.H., Omar, M.O., Mostafa, A.M., 1992. Species composition
of collected pollen loads by honeybee (Apis mellifera L.), pollen flora and floral
calender of Assiut region. In: Proc. 4th Nat. Conf. Pests Dis. Veg. & Fruits in
Egypt, pp. 177–195.
Ismail, A.M., Owayss, A.A., Mohanny, K.M., Salem, R.A., 2013. Evaluation of pollen
collected by honeybee, Apis mellifera L. colonies at Fayoum Governorate, Egypt.
Part 1: Botanical origin. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 12, 129–135.
Kirk, W., 2004. Faba bean (Vicia faba). Bee World 85, 60–62.
Khanbash, M.S., Bin Ghodel, A.Y., 1994. Seasonal collection and storage of pollen in
honeybee colonies with different sizes. J. Yemeni Agric. Res. Aden Univ. 5, 1–14.
Köppler, K., Vorwohl, G., Koeiger, N., 2007. Comparison of pollen spectra collected
by four different subspecies of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Apidologie 38, 341–
353.
Louveaux, J., Maurizio, A., Vorwohl, G., 1978. Methods of melissopalynology. Bee
World 59, 139–157.
Luz, C.F., Barth, O.M., 2012. Pollen analysis of honey and beebread derived from
Brazilian mangroves. Brazil. J. Botany 35, 79–85.
Manning, R., 2008. The effect of high and low fat pollens on honeybee longevity.
RIRDC Publication No. 08/031. Dept. Agric., Western Australia.
Mohanna, N.E., 1989. An important source of nectar and pollen during the dearth
period in Egypt. Alex. J. Agric. Res. 34, 173–182.
Mossadegh, M.S., 1990. Honey and pollen sources in Lorestan. Iran. Bee World 71,
25–32.
Nehru, C.R., Thankamani, S., Jayarathnam, K., Levijospph, P.M., 1988. Nectar and
pollen plants for extending the flow period in Rubber-growing areas of India.
Bee World 60, 118–119.
Neupane, K.R., Thapa, R.B., 2005. Pollen collection and brood production by
honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) under Chitwan condition of Nepal. J. Inst. Agric.
Anim. Sci. 26, 143–148.
Paudayal, K.N., Gautam, I., 2011. Scanning Electron Microscopic studies on surface
pattern of the pollen loads from Apis cerana in Jajarkot district. Nepal J. Sci.
Technol. 12, 340–349.
Payawal, P.C., Tilde, A.C., Manimtim, A.L., 1991. Year round pollen sources of Italian
honeybees (Apismellifera L.) in the Philippines III. Selected areas. Philippine
Agric. 74, 503–509.
Reyahi, B.A., 1999. Melliferous flora of Palestine: some important species with
potenial for introduction to other regions of the world. In: Proc. 36th Apimondia
Cong. Vancouver, Canada, 12–17 Sep, p. 269.
SAS Institute, 2003. SAS/STAT User’s Guide release 9.1. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC
27513.
Sattigi, H.N., Lingappa, S., 1993. Foraging activities of Indian honeybee Apis Cerana
Fabr. Under Dhrwad Conditions Karnataka. J. Agric. Sci. 6, 352–354.
Seijo, M.C., Aira, M.J., Lglesias, M.I., Jato, M.V., 1994. Foraging activity of the
honeybee on Actinidia deliciosa Chev. as shown by pollen analysis. Grana 33,
286–291.
Shawer, M.B., 1987. Major pollen sources in Kafrelsheikh, Egypt and the effect of
pollen supply on brood area and honey yield. J. Apic. Res. 26, 43–46.
Shawer, M.B., El-Dakhakhni, N.M., Helal, R.M., Taha, E.A., 2003. Effect of moving the
apiaries on activity of honeybee colonies. 1-Gathering and storing pollen, brood
rearing and wax secretion. J. Agric. Res. Tanta Univ. 29, 250–267.
Singh, R.K., 2003. Studies on pollen and nectar sources to honeybees at Dehradun,
Uttaranchal. India. Asian Bee J. 5, 129–138.
Taha, E.A., 2000. Effect of transferring the apiaries on activity of honeybee colonies
Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis. Fac. Agric. Tanta Univ, Egypt. 117 pp.
Taha, E.A., 2005. Studies on honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.
Fac. Agric. Tanta Univ., Egypt. 151 pp.
Taha, E.A., 2007. Importance of banana Musa sp. (Musaceae) for honeybee Apis
mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Egypt. Bull. Ent. Soc. Egypt II, 125–133.
Taha, E.A., 2013. Survey of nectar and pollen sources in Al-Ahssa district, Saudi
Arabia. In: Proc. 43rd Inter. Apic. Cong. 29 Sep.–4 Oct. Kyiv, Ukrania, P 247.
Taha, E.A., 2014. Seasonal variation of foraging activity, pollen collection and
growth of honeybee colonies in Al-Ahsa. Saudi Arabia. Bull. Ent. Soc. Egypt 91,
163–175.
Taha, E.A., 2015a. A study on nectar and pollen sources for honeybee Apis mellifera L.
in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. J. Entomol.d ZoolSt. 3, 272–277.
Taha, E.A., 2015b. Chemical composition and amounts of mineral elements in
honeybee-collected pollen in relation to botanic origin. J. Apic. Sci. 59, 75–81.
6E.-K.A. Taha et al. / Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences xxx (2017) xxx–xxx
Please cite this article in press as: Taha, E.-K.A., et al. Nectar and pollen sources for honeybees in Kafrelsheikh province of northern Egypt. Saudi Journal of
Biological Sciences (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.12.010
Taha, E.A., 2015c. The impact of feeding certain pollen substitutes on maintaining
the strength and productivity of honeybee colonies (Apis mellifera L.). Bull. Ent.
Soc. Egypt, Econ. Ser. 41, 63–74.
Taha, E.A., Bayoumi, Y.A., 2009. The value of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) as
pollinator of summer seed watermelon (Citrullus lanatuscolothynthoides L.:
Cucurbitaceae) in Egypt. Acta Biol. Szeg. 53, 33–37.
Taha, E.A., AL-Kahtani, S.N., 2013. Relationship between population size and
productivity of honeybee colonies. J. Entomol. 10, 163–169.
Taha, E.A., Al-Kahtani, S.N., 2017. Comparison of the activity and productivity of
Carniolan (Apis mellifera carnica Pollmann) and Yemeni (Apis mellifera jemenitica
Ruttner) subspecies under environmental conditions of the Al-Ahsa oasis of
eastern Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
sjbs.2017.10.009.
Taha, E.A., Nour, M.E., Shawer, M.B., 2006. Loofah, Luffa aegyptiaca Mill.
(Cucurbitaceae), a source of nectar and pollen for honeybee Apis mellifera L.
(Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Egypt. Bull. Ent. Soc. Egypt 83, 337–345.
Taha, E.A., Al-Abdulsalam, M., Al-Kahtani, S.N., 2016. Insect pollinators and foraging
behavior of honeybees on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in Saudi Arabia. J. Kansas
Entomol. Soc. 89, 92–99.
Taha, E.A., Al-Kahtani, S.N., Taha, R., 2017. Protein content and amino acids
composition in bee-pollen from the major sources in Al-Ahsa Saudi Arabia.
Saudi J. biol. Sci. 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.06.003.
Villanueva, R.G., 1989. Important plant species for Apiculture in Ejido plan Del Rio,
Veracrus, Mexico. In: Proc. 4th Inter. Conf. Apic. Tropical Climates, Cairo, Egypt,
pp. 138–145.
Widrlechner, M.P., Senechal, N.P., 1992. Relationships between nectar production
and honeybee preference. Bee World 73, 119–127.
Wróblewska, A., Warakomska, Z., Kaminska, M., 2010. The pollen spectrum of
beebread from the Lublin region (Poland). J. Apic. Sci. 54, 81–89.
Zoratti, M.L., Barbattini, R., Frill, F., 1995. Bee flora in the Codroipo area (Italy). Ape
Nostra Amica 17, 5–14.
E.-K.A. Taha et al. / Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences xxx (2017) xxx–xxx 7
Please cite this article in press as: Taha, E.-K.A., et al. Nectar and pollen sources for honeybees in Kafrelsheikh province of northern Egypt. Saudi Journal of
Biological Sciences (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.12.010
... Such colonies use up a major part of nectar and pollen collected directly after the dearth for buildup of colony population. Taha et al. (2017) found that Kafr El-Sheikh province is very rich in floral resources nectar and pollen, ninety seven plant species belonging to 33 families were recorded as nectar sources, and 82 plant species belonging to 36 families were recorded as pollen sources during the whole year. The largest amount of monthly trapped pollen was obtained during May followed by August. ...
... These results aligned with similar researchin West Sumatra polyculture plantations that found ten species of Fabaceae as A. cerana forage(Jasmi 2017). Plants from the family also dominated as pollen and nectar producers for the honey bee A. mellifera in the dry savanna of Bauchi, Nigeria(Dukku et al. 2013).Furthermore, the species from Fabaceae were essential food sources for beekeeping(Taha et al. 2019). However,Mensah et al. (2017) stated that the dominant plants, which served as feed for honey bees in the Limpopo forest, South Africa, were from the Rutaceae and Stilbaceae families. ...
Article
Full-text available
Apis cerana became a common species for beekeeping activities in Indonesia. The sustainability of beekeeping activities depended on the availability of feeds in forests with various plant species, which served as honey bee forage. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the forage plant diversity for A. cerana beekeeping in Wanagama Education Forest, Gunungkidul, from November 2018 to April 2019. Data collection was done through the inventory of trees and understorey plant species around the apiary locations to measure their abundance, flowering conditions, and the number of honey bees on the flower. The analysis indicated that 20 species (10 families) of trees and 60 species (19 families) of understorey plants had potential forage. The observation revealed that honey bees collected nectar and pollen from seven species of trees and 12 species of understorey plants. The highest visitation intensity was in the morning from two trees (Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus grandis) and three understoreys (Oxalis barrelieri, Passiflora suberosa, and Zea mays). Information on potential plant species for honey bee forage could improve beekeeping development in Wanagama Education Forest.
... Some researchers followed direct corbicular or scopal loads collection by capturing the returning pollen foragers of bumblebees, honeybees, and stingless bees (Serra et al. 2012, Pal and Karmakar 2013, Ferreira and Absy 2015, Layek et al. 2015, Freitas et al. 2018, Layek and Karmakar 2018a, Nandi and Karmakar 2018. Otherwise, passive way of pollen collection using a pollen trap installed at the nest entrance was more common for managed honeybees (De Sá-Otero et al. 2009, Forcone et al. 2011, Vergara Lopez et al. 2013, Lau et al. 2019, Taha et al. 2019, Layek et al. 2020b). The passive collection mode is easier, less laborious, and time-consuming than the direct collection mode. ...
Article
Full-text available
Flowering plants and pollinators are in a mutualistic association, where pollinators collect floral resources and plants receive pollination services. Bees and other pollinators are declining in many parts of the world, and their loss affects the functional composition of fauna, flora, and habitats. Different strategies are being deployed to improve pollinator services, including the management of bees. Sustainable management of a bee species strongly depends on floral resource availability. Therefore, beekeepers need to have adequate knowledge about the surrounding vegetation (especially nectar and pollen sources for the bee species). Diverse methodologies are used around the world to determine floral resources for bees. Field surveys and pollen analysis of honey, corbicular/scopal pollen loads, residual pollens in brood cells, forager’s body surface pollen content, and internal organs (gut, intestine, crop, etc.) were used by the researchers. For pollen identification, most researchers carried out microscopy-based methods. However, pollen DNA-based methods were also used by researchers in recent years. Regarding the morphology-based identification, most researchers processed pollen samples according to Erdtman’s acetolysis method to increase the visibility of diagnostic characteristics of the pollen grains. The method specified by the International Commission for Bee Botany was used to conduct qualitative and quantitative pollen analysis on honey samples. For quantitative pollen load analysis, researchers used numerous techniques that may have been the most effective. Our discussion about the different techniques utilized to determine floral resources of a bee species will be helpful for researchers in selecting a suitable protocol and may assist in developing superior methodologies.
... It is necessary for beekeepers to know the sources of pollen and nectar to plan well their beekeeping for economic productivity. That is why many studies around the world have been conducted to find out the sources of pollen and nectar like, in Brazil (Luz and Barth, 2012); in Costa Rica (Freitas, 1994); in Bulgaria (Atanassova and Lazarova, 2010); in Egypt (Taha, 2000;Helal et al., 2003;Fathy, 2008;Ismail et al., 2013;Abou-Shaara, 2015;Esmael et al., 2016;Taha et al, 2019); in Germany (Köppler et al., 2007;Beil et al., 2008); in India (Singh, 2003); in Iran (Mossadegh, 1990); in Italy (Fortunato et al., 2006); in Mexico (Villanueva, 1989); in Nibal (Paudayal and Gautam, 2011); in Nigeria (Dukku, 2003); in Palestine (Reyahi, 1999); in Philippines (Payawal et al., 1991); in Poland (Wróblewska et al., 2010); in Saudi Arabia (Taha, 2013(Taha, , 2015aTaha et al., 2016;Adgaba et al., 2017Taha et al., 2017); in Spain (Seijo et al., 1994); in Turkey (Bilisik et al. 2008); in USA (Baum et al., 2011). However, this is the first report that was interested with surveying the sources of pollen and nectar in one of the border desert provinces, in an attempt to help beekeepers to increase their productivity through transferring their hives to areas rich in these resources. ...
... Consequently, even though Z. mays does not offer an additional way to reward pollinators, such as floral nectar or extrafloral nectaries found in G. hirsutum (Danka 2005, Marzinzig et al. 2018, average pollen loads containing Z. mays were higher compared to less frequently planted crop species. Other crops like G. hirsutum may also be less frequently collected for pollen because the pollen is too difficult to pack (Vaissiere and Vinson 1994), although it can still provide nectar resources for bees (Loper and DeGrandi-Hoffman 1994, Danka 2005, Taha et al. 2019. ...
Article
Previous exploration has found that bee visitation tends to benefit yields of many pollinator-independent crops. However, the reverse of this relationship—if pollinator-independent crops benefit bees—has not been extensively studied or explicitly reviewed. Therefore, we initiated a review of the literature using Web of Science and EBSCOhost to determine whether: 1) bees collect pollen from pollinator-independent crops, and 2) pollinator-independent crops provided adequate nutrition for bees. These factors help establish if pollinator-independent crops could benefit bees. We found 45 peer-review articles that included bee pollen trap data on 13 pollinator-independent crops (self-pollinating and wind-pollinated plants), with Zea mays, Brassica napus, and Glycine max pollen most often found in pollen traps. Pollinator-independent crops averaged 12% of total pollen loads, but due to high variability, the median was only 1.6%. Pollen from pollinator-independent crops increased in landscapes with more agricultural cover, but our data was heavily skewed towards honey bees (Apis mellifera). We found the average crude protein for B. napus and G. max was high enough to support honey bee requirements (>20%), along with providing essential amino acids; however, average crude protein and essential amino acids may be lacking in Z. mays. Although some pollinator-independent crops are found in pollen traps and provide adequate resources for bees, they may fail to provide temporally stable resources and chemical-free space. For improved health and reproduction, bees need access to semi-natural landscapes within diverse cropping systems to increase diet mixing. This will help amplify the mutualistic relationship between bees and pollinator-independent crops.
Article
Full-text available
Urbanisation is a primary cause of pollinator biodiversity loss because it depletes floral and nesting resources. Therefore, it is crucial to promote urban greening to provide pollen and nectar sources for pollinators. To investigate the floral resources of the urban environment, we used an efficient floral bio-sampler, Apis mellifera L. Pollen was collected from three beehives using pollen traps every 2 weeks from May to September 2018 at four different sites in Tokyo (Yaesu and Kiba) and Chiba prefecture (Kashiwanoha and Nishichiba), Japan. DNA metabarcoding of pollen samples was used to identify the taxonomic composition of the floral resources. The results showed that 168 species belonging to 57 taxonomic families were used as pollen sources in total, with a large number of honey-plant species in the Fabaceae (15 spp.), Asteraceae (14 spp.), or Rosaceae (8 spp.) families. 52% of the floral resources were alien species, 20% were cultivar species, 25% were native to Japan, and the remaining 3% were not identified. We observed that spontaneously colonising plant species and street planting were important sources of foraging for urban honeybees. We then studied the spatial occurrences of the most foraged species by honeybees around hives. Sixty floral species on urban roads were targeted, and after 60 transects in May 2019, 24 were identified. Urban greening programmes based on our findings could enhance biodiversity by creating green spaces suitable for pollinators in urban areas and along urban road network.
Article
An integrated method for standardization of propolis using chromatographic, spectroscopic, palynological and biological analyses was implemented in this study. Digitally-enhanced HPTLC images using dual visualization approach with four image analysis software packages adopting different digitalization algorithms were comparatively evaluated i.e.; Sorbfil TLC View®, ImageJ®, JustTLC® and Gel Analyzer®. ImageJ® and Gel Analyzer® showed superior figures of merits in case of flavonoids and phenolic acids quantitation, respectively. Unsupervised and supervised multivariable pattern recognition models were constructed for comprehensive discrimination between the three propolis types (blue, orange and green) collected from various geographical locations worldwide. HPTLC-ESI-MS were utilized for precise identification of the discriminatory phytoconstituents. Fingerprint-efficacy relationship analysis was conducted via an Orthogonal Projection to Latent Structure multivariate model to unravel the bio-efficient markers in terms of α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition as main targets. 3,4-Dimethoxycinnamic acid, caffeic acid, isoferulic acid, rosmarinic acid, and quercetin were found to be the main health-relevant markers. A complementary fast, simple and readily available UV spectroscopic method using aluminium chloride as bathochromic shift reagent was used as independent method for prediction of aforementioned biomarkers using a validated Partial Least Squares Regression model. In addition, palynological analysis was implemented to determine the botanical origin of Egyptian propolis for the first time. Twenty-eight pollen types assigned to 13 families were identified, with Asteraceae being the highest representative one. The investigated samples lacked dominant pollen types, which reflected the multifloral origin of Egyptian propolis. Identification of plant sources of propolis, which directly affect its chemical composition and subsequently its biological efficacy represents an integral part of its standardization.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Article
Full-text available
This study was conducted at the apiary of the Agricultural and Veterinary Training and Research Station of King Faisal University in the Al-Ahsa oasis of eastern Saudi Arabia. We performed a comparison between Carniolan (Apis mellifera carnica Pollmann) and Yemeni (Apis mellifera jemenitica Ruttner) honeybee races to determine the monthly fluctuations in foraging activity, pollen collection, colony growth and honey yield production under the environmental conditions of the Al-Ahsa oasis of eastern Saudi Arabia. We found three peaks in the flight activity of the two races, and the largest peaks occurred during September and October. Compared to Carniolan bee colonies, the performance of Yemeni bee colonies was superior in terms of stored pollen, worker and drone brood rearing, and the adult population size. The Carniolan bee colonies produced 27.77% and 27.50% more honey than the Yemeni bee colonies during the flow seasons of alfalfa and sidir, respectively, with an average increase of 27.64%. It could be concluded that the race of bees is an important factor affecting the activity and productivity of honeybee colonies. The Yemeni bee race produced more pollen, a larger brood and more bees, which exhibited a longer survival. The imported Carniolan bees can be reared in eastern Saudi Arabia, but the Yemeni bee race is still better.
Article
Full-text available
Protein content and amino acid composition of bee-pollens from major pollen flora in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia were determined to investigate the nutritive value of pollen protein relative to requirements of honeybees and adult humans. The major pollen sources were alfalfa, date palm, rape, summer squash, and sunflower. Bee-pollens from alfalfa and date palm showed high content of crude protein and amino acid concentrations. Bee-pollen from sunflower had low content of those components. Eighteen amino acids were found in bee-pollens from the five major floral sources. The highest concentrations of individual amino acids valine, leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine and proline were obtained from alfalfa bee-pollen; lysine, arginine, cysteine, tryptophan and tyrosine from date palm; methionine, histidine, glycine and alanine from summer squash; threonine, serine and glutamic acid from sunflower; and aspartic acid from rape bee-pollen. The amino acid composition obtained from sunflower bee-pollen showed the lowest concentrations of the essential amino acids: isoleucine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine and valine. Apart from methionine, arginine and isoleucine, the essential amino acids of bee-pollen from alfalfa, date palm, summer squash and rape exceeded the honeybees’ requirements. Methionine was the limiting amino acid in bee-pollens from the five selected sources. Concentrations of essential amino acids in the tested bee-pollens were variable and significantly correlated to their botanical origin of pollen. Bee-pollens from alfalfa, date palm and summer squash was found to be rich source of protein and amino acids for bees and for humans.
Article
Full-text available
Pollen analyses were performed on honey and beebread from hives in apiaries located in two distinct mangrove areas dominated by Laguncularia racemosa (L.) C.F. Gaernt. One apiary was located at the edge of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro State, and the other near Maranguá Bay, Bahia State, Brazil. We investigated the contribution of nectar and pollen from mangrove vegetation to Apis mellifera L. honey and beebread stocks. Intensive visitation to this plant species by honeybees and the presence of its pollen grains in honey and beebread confirmed the importance of Laguncularia racemosa as a polliniferous and nectariferous species.
Article
Full-text available
In arid zones, the shortage of bee forage is critical and usually compels beekeepers to move their colonies in search of better forages. Identifying and mapping the spatiotemporal distribution of the bee forages over given area is important for better management of bee colonies. In this study honey bee plants in the target areas were inventoried following, ground inventory work supported with GIS applications. The study was conducted on 85 large plots of 50 × 50 m each. At each plot, data on species name, height, base diameter, crown height, crown diameter has been taken for each plant with their respective geographical positions. The data were stored, and processed using Trimble GPS supported with ArcGIS10 software program. The data were used to estimate the relative frequency, density, abundance and species diversity, species important value index and apicultural value of the species. In addition, Remotely Sensed Satellite Image of the area was obtained and processed using Hopfield Artificial Neural Network techniques. During the study, 182 species from 49 plant families were identified as bee forages of the target area. From the total number of species; shrubs, herbs and trees were accounting for 61%, 27.67%, and 11.53% respectively. Of which Ziziphus spina-christi, Acacia tortilis, Acacia origina, Acacia asak, Lavandula dentata, and Hypoestes forskaolii were the major nectar source plants of the area in their degree of importance. The average vegetation cover values of the study areas were low (
Thesis
Full-text available
5- SUMMARY The present investigations were conducted in the apiary of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kafr El-Sheikh, Tanta University and other apiaries in Kafr El-Sheikh and El-Beheira Governorates, during the blooming periods of faba bean (1/1- 25/3), citrus (22/3- 16/4), squash (10/4- 4/5), Egyptian clover (26/4- 1/6) and cotton (1/7- 20/8) to study the effect of moving the colonies to rich-nectar and pollen sources locations during the previous blossoming periods on some activities of honeybee colonies, some traits of workers and drones and production and quality of queens throughout two successive years of 2002 and 2003. ¬Thirty two colonies (each five combs) of hybrid Carniolan honeybees were divided into two groups at the beginning of each blooming period. The first group was left in the apiary of the Fac. Agric. at Kafr El-Shiekh region without moving. The second group was moved to El-Khaleeg, Motobes and Ammya Village locations (Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate) during the blooming periods of faba bean and each of clover and cotton, respectively and moved to Rasheed and Hosh Essa locations (El-Beheira Governorate) during the flowering periods of citrus and squash, respectively. Obtained results could be summarized as follows: 5.1- Survey of nectar and pollen plants. Forty six plant species belonging to seventeen plant families in addition to the aromatic plants were recorded as pollen and/or nectar sources during the flowering periods in the different sites. 5.2- Some activities of honeybee colonies. The mean stored pollen area (sq. inch)/12 days/colony, total stored pollen area (sq. inch)/colony, mean weight of royal jelly/queen cell and mean honey yield/ colony were highly significant higher in moved colonies than non-moved ones during all blooming periods in both years. 5.2.1- Stored pollen. The largest mean stored pollen area (sq. inch)/12 days/colony (152.75 & 70.50) was recorded during clover blossoming period in Ammya region, while the largest total stored pollen area (sq. inch)/colony (629.25 & 635.12) was obtained from colonies located in Motobes region during faba bean flowering period in 2002 and 2003 years, respectively. Highly significant positive relationships between mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony and total stored pollen area/colony were noticed in 2002 and 2003 years. 5.2.2- Royal jelly production. The heaviest mean weight of royal jelly/queen cell (149.75 & 151.00 mg) was obtained from colonies located in Rasheed region during citrus blooming period in 2002 and 2003 years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations between royal jelly/queen cell and mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony, total stored pollen area/colony, weight of worker, length and width of mandibular gland, number of lobules/1 mm of hypopharyngeal gland and acinal surface area were observed in the first and second years. 5.2.3- Honey yield. The highest mean honey yield (kg)/colony (4.45 & 4.54) was recorded during citrus blooming period in Rasheed region in the two years, respectively. A highly significant positive correlation between honey yield/colony and mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony was detected, while non-significant correlation was observed with total stored pollen area/colony in both years. 5.3- Honeybee worker. The mean worker sealed brood area (sq. inch)/12 days/colony, total worker sealed brood area (sq. inch)/colony, mean weight of worker, mean length and width of the mandibular glands, mean number of lobules/1 mm, mean acinal surface area and length and width of the four wax mirrors were highly significant higher in moved colonies than non-moved ones during all blossoming periods throughout the two years. 5.3.1- Worker sealed brood. The largest mean worker sealed brood area (sq. inch)/12 days/colony (292.25 & 299.63) was recorded during citrus flowering period in Rasheed region, but the greatest total worker sealed brood area (sq. inch)/colony (2016.00 & 2035.10) was recorded during faba bean flowering period in Motobes region in both years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations were found between mean worker sealed brood area/12 days/colony and mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony and honey yield/colony in the two years. 5.3.2- Worker body weight. The heaviest mean weight of worker (110.53 & 113.87 mg) was recorded in colonies moved to Rasheed region during citrus flowering period, while the lightest one ( 103.25 & 103.54 mg) was recorded in colonies located in Kafr El-Sheikh region during squash blossoming period in both years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations between mean weight of worker and each of mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony, total stored pollen area/colony and honey yield/colony were found in the two years. 5.3.3- Mandibular glands. The highest mean length (2.61 & 2.62 mm) and width (0.93 & 0.96 mm) of mandibular gland were recorded during clover flowering period in Ammya region, while the least length (2.36 & 2.37 mm) and width (0.83 & 0.83 mm) were recorded during squash blooming period in Kafr El-Sheikh region during 2002 and 2003 years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations were noted between length and width of mandibular gland from one side and mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony, total stored pollen area/colony and mean weight worker from the other side in the first and second years. 5.3.4- Hypopharyngeal glands. The highest mean number of lobules/1 mm (44.00 & 44.58) was found in colonies located in Rasheed region during citrus flowering period, while the highest mean of acinal surface area (0.038 & 0.038) was recorded during clover blooming period in Ammya region in both years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations between mean number of lobules/1 mm of the right hypopharyngeal gland and acinal surface area from one side and mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony, total stored pollen area/colony and mean weight of worker from the other side were observed in the two years. 5.3.5- Wax mirrors. The highest mean lengths of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th wax mirrors (1.37 & 1.37, 1.53 & 1.53, 1.54 & 1.54 and 1.45 & 1.45 mm) were recorded in colonies located in Ammya region during clover flowering period, while the highest mean width (2.24 & 2.25, 2.25 & 2.25, 2.15 & 2.15 and 1.44 & 1.45 mm) were recorded in colonies located in Rasheed region throughout citrus flowering period in the two years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations between weight of worker and mean length and width of the 1st wax mirror were noted in both years. 5.4- Honeybee drone. The mean drone sealed brood area (sq. inch)/12 days/colony and total drone sealed brood area (sq. inch)/colony, weight of drone, external characters of drone, mean size of testis, seminal vesicle and mucus gland and mean number of sperms/drone were significantly higher in moved colonies than non-moved ones during all flowering periods in the two years. 5.4.1- Drone sealed brood. The largest mean of drone sealed brood area (sq. inch)/12 days/colony (10.13 & 10.63) was obtained from colonies located in Rasheed region during citrus blooming period, but the largest total drone sealed brood area (sq. inch)/colony (64.25 & 64.38) was recorded during faba bean blossoming period in Motobes region in the first and second years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations were found between mean drone sealed brood area/12 days/colony and honey yield/colony in the two years. The correlations between mean drone sealed brood area/12 days/colony and mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony were significant in the first year and highly significant in the second one. 5.4.2- Drone weight. The heaviest mean weight of drone (227.33 & 229.73 mg) was recorded in colonies moved to Rasheed region during citrus flowering period, while the lightest one (197.46 & 201.54 mg) was recorded in colonies located in Kafr El-Sheikh region during squash blooming period in both years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations were found between mean weight of drone and mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony, total stored pollen area/colony and honey yield/colony in the two years. 5.4.3- External characters of drone. The highest mean length of the right fore-wing (12.22 & 12.22 mm) was recorded during clover flowering period in Ammya region but the highest mean width of the right fore-wing (4.32 & 4.35 mm) and number of hamuli on the right hind wing (23.53 & 24.25 hamuli/wing) were obtained during citrus flowering period in Rasheed region in the first and second years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations between mean weight of drone and length and width of the right fore-wing and number of hamuli on the right hind wing were detected in the first and second years. 5.4.4- Reproductive system. The largest mean size of testis (35.41 & 36.91 mm3), seminal vesicle (1.50 & 1.54 mm3) and mucus gland (5.31 & 5.50 mm3) were found during clover flowering period in Ammya region in both years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations were noticed between mean volume of testis, seminal vesicle and mucus gland from one side and mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony, total stored pollen area/colony, honey yield/colony and weight of drone from the other side in both years. 5.4.5- Number of spermatozoa. The highest mean number of spermatozoa/drone (12.35 & 13.21 million sperms/drone) was found in colonies located in Ammya during clover flowering period, while the least one (8.12 & 8.22 million sperms/drone) was recorded in colonies located in Kafr El-Sheikh region during faba bean blossoming period in 2002 and 2003 years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations were observed between number of spermatozoa/drone and mean stored pollen area/12 days /colony, total stored pollen area/colony, honey yield/colony, weight of drone, size of testis and volume of seminal vesical in the two years. 5.5- Honeybee queen. The percentage of accepted queen cells, weight of queen, volume of queen cell, external characters of queens, volume of spermatheca, mean length of the right ovary and number of ovarioles/ovary were significantly higher in moved colonies than non-moved ones during the all flowering periods in both years. 5.5.1- Acceptance of grafted queen cells. The highest percentage of accepted queen cells (62.22 & 63.33%) was obtained from colonies located in Rasheed region during citrus flowering period in the two years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations were found between mean percentage of accepted queen cells and each of mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony, total stored pollen area/colony, mean worker sealed brood area/12 days/colony, total worker sealed brood area/colony, royal jelly/queen cell and honey yield/colony in the first and second years. 5.5.2- Queen weight and size of queen cell. The heaviest weight of queen (161.20 & 161.67 mg) and largest size of queen cell (8.72 & 8.73 mm3) were recorded in colonies moved to Rasheed region during citrus flowering period, while the lightest weight of queen (152.00 & 151.80 mg) and the smallest size of queen cell (8.17 & 8.13 mm3) were recorded in colonies located in Kafr El-Sheikh region during citrus blooming period in the two years, respectively Highly significant positive correlations were found between mean weight of newly emerged queen and each of mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony, honey yield/colony, royal jelly/queen cell and size of queen cell in the two years, respectively. Also, a highly significant positive correlation was found between size of queen cell and length and width of the 1st wax mirror in both years. 5.5.3- External characters of queens. The highest mean length (10.00 &10.01 mm) and width (3.38 & 3.39 mm) of the right fore-wing, length of abdominal 3rd and 4th tergites (6.35 & 6.36 mm), width of 3rd tergum (10.18 & 10.21 mm), width of 4th tergum (10.08 & 10.12 mm) and number of hamuli (19.62 & 19.93 hamuli/wing) were obtained from colonies located in Rasheed region during citrus flowering period in 2002 and 2003, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations were observed between length and width of the right fore-wing, length of T3+4, width of T3, width of T4 and number of hamuli/wing of the newly emerged queens from one side and queen weight and size of queen cell from the other side in both years. 5.5.4- Volume of spermatheca. The largest size of spermatheca (0.882 &0.905 mm3) was obtained from colonies located in Rasheed region during citrus flowering period, while the smallest one (0.660 & 0.672 mm3) was recorded in colonies located in Kafr El-Sheikh region during squash blossoming period in both years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations were found between volume of spermatheca of newly emerged queens and each of mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony, total stored pollen area/colony, honey yield/colony, weight of royal jelly/queen cell, weight of queen, number of ovarioles/ovary and size of queen cell in the first and second years. 5.5.5- Measurements of the ovary. The highest length of the right ovary (3.29 & 3.30 mm) and number of ovarioles (150.31 & 151.60 ovarioles/ovary) were found in colonies located in Rasheed region during citrus blooming period in 2002 and 2003 years, respectively. Highly significant positive correlations were observed between mean length of the right ovary and the mean number of ovarioles/ovary from one side and mean stored pollen area/12 days/colony, total stored pollen area/colony, honey yield/ colony, weight of royal jelly/queen cell, weight of queen and size of queen cell from the other side in 2002 and 2003.
Article
Full-text available
This investigation was conducted at the Agricultural and Veterinary Training and Research Station, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, during the alfalfa growing season in 2014. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of phosphorus fertilization and honeybee pollination on alfalfa seed production. The experiment was divided into 9 treatments of open pollination, honeybee pollination, and non-pollination with three different levels (0, 300 or 600kg P2O5/ha/year) of triple super phosphate. All vegetative growth attributes of Hassawi alfalfa were significantly higher in the non-insect pollination plots, while the yield and yield component traits were significantly higher with either open pollination or honeybee pollination in parallel with the increasing level of phosphorus fertilizer up to 600kg P2O5/ha/year in light salt-affected loamy sand soils. There was no seed yield in Hassawi alfalfa without insect pollination. Therefore, placing honeybee colonies near the fields of Hassawi alfalfa and adding 600kg P2O5/ha/year can increase seed production.
Article
Full-text available
This study was carried out during spring and summer seasons in 2013, to investigate the efficiency of feeding pollen substitutes in spring and summer on maintaining the strength and increasing the productivity of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. The tested diets were as follows: Diet1 [brewer's yeast (40%) + defatted soybean flour (40%) + skimmed powder milk (10%) + honey (10%)], Diet2 [date molasses (40%) + defatted soybean flour (40%) + skimmed powder milk (10%) + honey (10%)], and Diet3 [date paste (40%) + defatted soybean flour (40%) + skimmed powder milk (10%) + honey (10%)]. Colonies consumed significantly less Diet3 than the other diets during the two seasons. Diet1 was the most suitable with maximum rate of storing pollen, colony growth and honey production. Adult populations in colonies fed Diet1 didn't differ from those fed Diet2, and were significantly larger than colonies fed Diet3 and unfed ones. Colonies fed on Diet1, Diet2 and Diet3 produced honey 94.29 & 111.43, 71.14 & 72.73 and 56.00 & 56.88 % more than unfed colonies during alfalfa and sidir seasons, respectively. It could be recommended to feed honeybee colonies on Diet1 or Diet2 during spring and summer to improve the activities of honeybee colonies, maintaining the strength of the colonies, and increasing the productivity.
Article
Full-text available
This study investigated bee-eating bird (Coraciiformes: Meropidae) predation on virgin honeybee queens in Saudi Arabia. The study also subsequently documented the effect of bird predation on colony strength, and foraging activity. Data were collected during 2011. The results indicated that bee-eating birds reduced flight survival. Eighty percent of 30 queens successfully mated when bee-eaters were not present in the apiary, when bee-eaters were present, only 46.67% of 30 queens successfully mated. Data also indicated no significant difference in the number of frames covered with adult bees in honey bee colonies during presence and absence of bee-eaters (6.3 and 6.8 frames of bees/colony, respectively) and frames of brood (3.0 and 2.8 frames of brood/colony, respectively. No significant difference was detected in the number of foraging honey bee workers gathering pollen from plant flowers when bee-eating birds were present or absent. This study also found that, bee-eating birds can affect the number of foragers gathering ground pollen and sugar syrup from dishes placed on distance (10, 75 and 150 meter) from the hives entrances.
Article
Full-text available
A survey of insect pollinators and the foraging behavior of Carniolan honey bees (Apis mellifera carnica Pollmann) and dwarf honey bees (A. florea F.) on alfalfa flowers was conducted in May of 2013 and 2014. Fifteen insect species belonging to 11 families and 6 orders were recorded as pollinators on alfalfa flowers. The most abundant order was Hymenoptera. In comparison to the Carniolan bees, the dwarf bees were more active on alfalfa flowers. Two peaks of foraging activity for the two species were recorded; the first one was at 0800–0900 hrs, while the second and the highest peak was at 1700–1800 hrs. Carniolan bees were more active in gathering pollen at 0800–0900 hrs. It is concluded that Carniolan and dwarf honey bees were found to be the most abundant pollinators on alfalfa flowers in Saudi Arabia. The present study recommends that, to protect insect pollinators, it is advisable to apply pesticides, if needed, during the flowering period of alfalfa when the bees are not active in the fields, so as to maintain the pollinator population and protect the alfalfa crop.