Content uploaded by Kyle Sue
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kyle Sue on Dec 09, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
CHRISTMAS 2017: ALL CREATURES GREAT AND SMALL
The science behind “man flu”
Kyle Sue explores whether men are wimps or just immunologically inferior
Kyle Sue clinical assistant professor in family medicine
Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s, NL, Canada
“Man flu” is a term so ubiquitous that it has been included in
the Oxford and Cambridge dictionaries. Oxford defines it as “a
cold or similar minor ailment as experienced by a man who is
regarded as exaggerating the severity of the symptoms.”1 Since
about half of the world’s population is male, deeming male viral
respiratory symptoms as “exaggerated” without rigorous
scientific evidence, could have important implications for men,
including insufficient provision of care.
Despite the universally high incidence and prevalence of viral
respiratory illnesses,2 no scientific review has examined whether
the term “man flu” is appropriately defined or just an ingrained
pejorative term with no scientific basis. Tired of being accused
of over-reacting, I searched the available evidence (box) to
determine whether men really experience worse symptoms and
whether this could have any evolutionary basis.
Of mice and men
Mice have long been accepted as good models of human
physiology for medical research,3 with records dating back to
William Harvey in 17th century England.4 Several studies show
that female mice have higher immune responses than males.5 6
This led to the hypothesis that sex dependent hormones have
an important role in outcomes of influenza. Further studies
suggest that oestradiol is implicated in this response in mice,7
with one study concluding that the hormone reduces “responses
associated with immunopathology” and enhances “responses
associated with recruitment of innate immune cells…into the
lungs.” 8
However, another mouse study suggests that stress and
corticosterone levels have a role, concluding that “the increase
in infection-induced corticosterone levels demonstrated in
females may have suppressed the behavioural symptoms of
infection.”9
Lending further weight to the oestradiol theory, an in-vitro study
sniffs at an underlying reason for man flu. Using human nasal
epithelial cell cultures infected with seasonal influenza A,
researchers showed that exposure to oestradiol or select
oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) decreased influenza
A titres in tissue from female, but not male, donors. Oestradiol
also significantly downregulated cell metabolic processes.
Adding oestrogen receptor antagonists reversed this antiviral
effect.10
Another study isolated mononuclear cells from 63 healthy people
grouped according to age and sex and cultured the cells with
rhinovirus. Cells cultured from premenopausal women had a
stronger immune response to rhinovirus than those from men
of the same age. This difference was not observed when
post-menopausal women were compared with men of the same
age, suggesting a hormonal link.11 12
Patterns in humans
Although animal and in-vitro studies are weak sources of
evidence, human research also points to different responses to
influenza in men and women. Even the World Health
Organization stresses that “sex should be considered when
evaluating influenza exposure and outcomes.”13 Epidemiological
data from 2004-10 for seasonal influenza in Hong Kong showed
that adult men had a higher risk of hospital admission,14 and in
a US observational study of influenza mortality from 1997 to
2007, men had higher rates of influenza associated deaths
compared with women in the same age groups. This was true
regardless of underlying heart disease, cancer, chronic
respiratory system disease, and renal disease.15
Studies of influenza vaccination suggest that women are more
responsive to vaccination than men.16 17 This is supported by the
finding that women report more local and systemic reactions to
influenza vaccine than men in questionnaires.18 One study noted
that men with higher testosterone levels had more down
regulation of antibody response to vaccination, suggesting an
immunosuppressive role for testosterone.16 This is consistent
with animal and in-vitro studies showing testosterone has an
immunosuppressive effect19 20 and a finding of higher levels of
inflammatory cytokines in men with androgen deficiencies than
in healthy controls.21
The sex differences extend to other respiratory infections beyond
influenza. In many acute respiratory diseases, males are more
susceptible to complications and exhibit a higher mortality.22
ksue@ualberta.ca
For personal use only: See rights and reprints http://www.bmj.com/permissions Subscribe: http://www.bmj.com/subscribe
BMJ 2017;359:j5560 doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5560 Page 1 of 3
Feature
FEATURE
Methods
I searched PubMed/MedLine, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar using combinations and variants
of terms “man”/“male”, “woman”/”female”, “gender”/“sex”, “influenza”/“flu”, “viral”, “respiratory”, “common cold”, “difference”, “comparison”,
“intensive care.” I read the abstracts of all articles found and narrowed articles down by relevance. References in each article were then
hand searched to ensure comprehensiveness.
Wyke and colleagues surveyed men and women consulting
general practitioners for common symptoms of minor infectious
respiratory illness, finding that “women were significantly more
likely to report cutting down activities in response to only one
symptom in each cohort.”23 This contradicts the common myth
that men cut down activities more than women by exaggerating
the severity of symptoms.
Furthermore, in an analysis of retrospective data from a common
cold unit on 1700 volunteers inoculated with virus (rhinovirus,
coronavirus, influenza, etc) during 1984-89, MacIntyre
postulated that “clinical observers are more ready to attribute
symptoms and illness to women than to men, and…they
under-rate men’s symptoms.” 24
Finally, in an unscientific survey completed by 2131 readers of
a popular magazine, men reported taking an average of three
days to recover from viral respiratory illness compared with 1.5
days for women. The male authors of this study conclude that
caregivers should “go that extra mile to care for us when we are
stricken with it, so that future shelves can be erected, cars can
be maintained and football stadia throughout the land can be
well attended”25—listing only a few of the many ways male
viral respiratory illnesses can affect society.
Immunity gap
Some evidence clearly supports men having higher morbidity
and mortality from viral respiratory illness than women because
they have a less robust immune system. However, conclusions
may be limited by author bias, inclusion of some low level
evidence, and not reporting a critical appraisal of the studies
cited. Additionally, the differences observed in these studies
may not be representative of all respiratory viruses, and
differences may be hidden within studies that did not stratify
the various viruses or other differences between the sexes.
The sex difference in immunity has been suggested to be
modulated by hormonal differences, with oestradiol being
immunoprotective and testosterone being immunosuppressive.
However, the reviewed studies did not consider other differences
between the sexes—for example, men have higher rates of
smoking worldwide26 and are less likely to take preventive care
or seek care when ill.27 Hormonal influence on immune response
is supported by evidence that pregnant women have more severe
influenza symptoms and reduced symptoms from autoimmune
diseases than non-pregnant women.28 29 However, it is unclear
how this is mediated or might apply to a difference between the
sexes, given the changes in oestrogen, progesterone, and other
hormones along with other stressors that occur during
pregnancy.
If the differences found in the above studies are real, the
evolutionary purpose of men’s higher symptoms from viral
respiratory infections remains unclear. Zuk postulates that “if
males require, for example, testosterone for aggressive behaviour
and the development of male secondary sexual characteristics,
selection for winning at the high-stakes game males play may
override the cost of any immunosuppressive effects of the
hormone.”30 Likewise, the authors of another study speculate
that reduced immunity is less important for men because males
of many species are more likely to die from trauma before an
infection kills them.16 Other academics agree that across species,
the male strategy of “live hard, die young” arising from stronger
intra-sexual competition than among females has led to less
investment in immunity31 and that “mounting immune responses
to clear viruses requires metabolic resources that might
otherwise be used for other biological processes, such as growth,
maintenance of secondary sex characteristics, and
reproduction.”32
Avitsur and colleagues suggest that the increase in male sickness
may be a strategy important for the survival since “it promotes
energy conservation and reduces the risk of encountering
predators.”9 Classic modes of energy conservation may include
lying on the couch, not getting out of bed, or receiving assistance
with basic activities of daily living, which could all be effective
for avoiding predators.
Further higher quality research is needed to clarify other aspects
of man flu. It remains uncertain whether viral titres, immune
response, symptoms, and recovery time can be affected by
environmental conditions. An example of future research may
include a controlled trial in which men are infected with a
respiratory virus, then subjected to rigorous research conditions
in which all their requests are met by a healthy designated
caregiver or they are left to fend for themselves. Another
potential study may examine whether men with robust immune
systems are less successful at mating compared with those with
weaker immune systems and correspondingly higher
testosterone. In other words, can the blame for man flu be shifted
to the people who select these men as sexual partners rather
than the men themselves?
Time to rest
The concept of man flu, as commonly defined, is potentially
unjust. Men may not be exaggerating symptoms but have weaker
immune responses to viral respiratory viruses, leading to greater
morbidity and mortality than seen in women. There are benefits
to energy conservation when ill. Lying on the couch, not getting
out of bed, or receiving assistance with activities of daily living
could also be evolutionarily behaviours that protect against
predators. Perhaps now is the time for male friendly spaces,
equipped with enormous televisions and reclining chairs, to be
set up where men can recover from the debilitating effects of
man flu in safety and comfort.
Competing interests: I have read and understood BMJ policy on
declaration of interests and declare that I have no competing interests.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer
reviewed.
1 Oxford Dictionaries. Man flu. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/man_flu.
2 Tang JW, Lam TT, Zaraket H, et al. INSPIRE Investigators. Global epidemiology of
non-influenza RNA respiratory viruses: data gaps and a growing need for surveillance.
Lancet Infect Dis 2017doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30238-4.
3 Perlman RL. Mouse models of human disease: an evolutionary perspective. Evol Med
Public Health 2016;2016:170-6.pmid:27121451.
4 Ericsson AC, Crim MJ, Franklin CL. A brief history of animal modeling. Mo Med
2013;110:201-5.pmid:23829102.
5 Lorenzo ME, Hodgson A, Robinson DP, Kaplan JB, Pekosz A, Klein SL. Antibody
responses and cross protection against lethal influenza A viruses differ between the sexes
in C57BL/6 mice. Vaccine 2011;29:9246-55. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.110 pmid:
21983155.
For personal use only: See rights and reprints http://www.bmj.com/permissions Subscribe: http://www.bmj.com/subscribe
BMJ 2017;359:j5560 doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5560 Page 2 of 3
FEATURE
6Hoffmann J, Otte A, Thiele S, Lotter H, Shu Y, Gabriel G. Sex differences in H7N9 influenza
A virus pathogenesis. Vaccine 2015;33:6949-54. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.044 pmid:
26319064.
7Pazos MA, Kraus TA, Muñoz-Fontela C, Moran TM. Estrogen mediates innate and adaptive
immune alterations to influenza infection in pregnant mice. PLoS One 2012;7:e40502.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040502 pmid:22792357.
8 Robinson DP, Hall OJ, Nilles TL, Bream JH, Klein SL. 17β-estradiol protects females
against influenza by recruiting neutrophils and increasing virus-specific CD8 T cell
responses in the lungs. J Virol 2014;88:4711-20. doi:10.1128/JVI.02081-13pmid:24522912.
9 Avitsur R, Mays JW, Sheridan JF. Sex differences in the response to influenza virus
infection: modulation by stress. Horm Behav 2011;59:257-64. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.
12.002 pmid:21167165.
10 Peretz J, Pekosz A, Lane AP, Klein SL. Estrogenic compounds reduce influenza A virus
replication in primary human nasal epithelial cells derived from female, but not male,
donors. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2016;310:L415-25. doi:10.1152/ajplung.
00398.2015 pmid:26684252.
11 Antrobus C. Gender differences in flu severity: fact or fiction?Australian Pharmacist
2012:31:288-92.
12 Carroll ML, Yerkovich ST, Pritchard AL, Davies JM, Upham JW. Adaptive immunity to
rhinoviruses: sex and age matter. Respir Res 2010;11:184-91. doi:10.1186/1465-9921-
11-184 pmid:21194432.
13 World Health Organization. Sex, gender, and influenza. WHO Press, 2010.
14 Wang X-L, Yang L, Chan K-H, et al. Age and sex differences in rates of
influenza-associated hospitalizations in Hong Kong. Am J Epidemiol 2015;182:335-44.
doi:10.1093/aje/kwv068 pmid:26219977.
15 Quandelacy TM, Viboud C, Charu V, Lipsitch M, Goldstein E. Age- and sex-related risk
factors for influenza-associated mortality in the United States between 1997-2007. Am J
Epidemiol 2014;179:156-67. doi:10.1093/aje/kwt235 pmid:24190951.
16 Furman D, Hejblum BP, Simon N, et al. Systems analysis of sex differences reveals an
immunosuppressive role for testosterone in the response to influenza vaccination. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:869-74. doi:10.1073/pnas.1321060111 pmid:24367114.
17 Engler RJ, Nelson MR, Klote MM, et al. Walter Reed Health Care System Influenza
Vaccine Consortium. Half- vs full-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (2004-2005):
age, dose, and sex effects on immune responses. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:2405-14.
doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2008.513 pmid:19064822.
18 Beyer WE, Palache AM, Kerstens R, Masurel N. Gender differences in local and systemic
reactions to inactivated influenza vaccine, established by a meta-analysis of fourteen
independent studies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1996;15:65-70. doi:10.1007/
BF01586187 pmid:8641306.
19 Olsen NJ, Kovacs WJ. Gonadal steroids and immunity. Endocr Rev 1996;17:369-84.pmid:
8854050.
20 Rettew JA, Huet-Hudson YM, Marriott I. Testosterone reduces macrophage expression
in the mouse of toll-like receptor 4, a trigger for inflammation and innate immunity. Biol
Reprod 2008;78:432-7. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.107.063545 pmid:18003947.
21 Malkin CJ, Pugh PJ, Jones RD, Kapoor D, Channer KS, Jones TH. The effect of
testosterone replacement on endogenous inflammatory cytokines and lipid profiles in
hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:3313-8. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-
031069 pmid:15240608.
22 Giefing-Kröll C, Berger P, Lepperdinger G, Grubeck-Loebenstein B. How sex and age
affect immune responses, susceptibility to infections, and response to vaccination. Aging
Cell 2015;14:309-21. doi:10.1111/acel.12326 pmid:25720438.
23 Wyke S, Hunt K, Ford G. Gender differences in consulting a general practitioner for
common symptoms of minor illness. Soc Sci Med 1998;46:901-6. doi:10.1016/S0277-
9536(97)00217-7 pmid:9541075.
24 Macintyre S. Gender differences in the perceptions of common cold symptoms. Soc Sci
Med 1993;36:15-20. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90301-J pmid:8424180.
25 Boynton P. Are reports of “man flu” just Nuts?BMJ 2006;333:1128doi:10.1136/bmj.39041.
590556.59.
26 Guindon GE, Boisclair D. Past, current and future trends in tobacco use: HNP discussion
paper. The World Bank, 2003.
27 Baker P, Dworkin SL, Tong S, Banks I, Shand T, Yamey G. The men’s health gap: men
must be included in the global health equity agenda. Bull World Health Organ
2014;92:618-20. doi:10.2471/BLT.13.132795 pmid:25197149.
28 Yudin MH. Risk management of seasonal influenza during pregnancy: current perspectives.
Int J Womens Health 2014;6:681-9. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S47235 pmid:25114593.
29 Adams Waldorf KM, Nelson JL. Autoimmune disease during pregnancy and the
microchimerism legacy of pregnancy. Immunol Invest 2008;37:631-44. doi:10.1080/
08820130802205886 pmid:18716941.
30 Zuk M. The sicker sex. PLoS Pathog 2009;5:e1000267. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.
1000267 pmid:19180235.
31 Restif O, Amos W. The evolution of sex-specific immune defences. Proc Biol Sci
2010;277:2247-55. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0188 pmid:20335214.
32 Klein SL, Hodgson A, Robinson DP. Mechanisms of sex disparities in influenza
pathogenesis. J Leukoc Biol 2012;92:67-73. doi:10.1189/jlb.0811427 pmid:22131346.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already
granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/
permissions
For personal use only: See rights and reprints http://www.bmj.com/permissions Subscribe: http://www.bmj.com/subscribe
BMJ 2017;359:j5560 doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5560 Page 3 of 3
FEATURE