ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

The need to increase food production and improve the quality of our environment has prompted a search for materials to control wind and water erosion. This paper is a review of research and development associated with application, methods, and amounts of mulch types-crop residues, chemical soil stabilizers, and feedlot wastes (manure)-required to control wind erosion. An effective wind erosion control treatment is one that can resist a 38.0 m/s wind as measured at 15.2 m. Mulching has becomes an important practice in modern field production. Mulch paper reduces the application of chemical fertilizer and herbicide, weed control and maintain the land temperature. This article reviews the published research on mulches and discusses the opportunities that they solving the problem in agriculture.
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH C OMM UNICATION CENTRE
www.arccj ournals.co m
*Corresponding author’s e-mail: rupali_flori@rediffmail.com
Effect of mulching on soil and water conservation -A review
Rupali Sharma* and Sandeep Bhardwaj
Department of Horticulture, COA,
Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India.
Received: 27-05-2017 Accepted: 12-10-2017 DOI: 10.18805/ag.R-1732
ABSTRACT
The need to increase food production and improve the quality of our environment has prompted a search for materials to
control wind and water erosion. This paper is a review of research and development associated with application, methods,
and amounts of mulch types-crop residues, chemical soil stabilizers, and feedlot wastes (manure)-required to control wind
erosion. An effective wind erosion control treatment is one that can resist a 38.0 m/s wind as measured at 15.2 m. Mulching
has becomes an important practice in modern field production. Mulch paper reduces the application of chemical fertilizer
and herbicide, weed control and maintain the land temperature. This article reviews the published research on mulches and
discusses the opportunities that they solving the problem in agriculture.
Key words: Conservation, Mulching, Plastic mulch, Soil properties, Weeds.
India has made immense development in agriculture
and food security. It began with the decision to adopt superior
yielding, disease resistant wheat varieties in combination with
better far ming knowled ge to impr ove pr odu cti vity.
Development of irrigation schemes, copious use of fertilizers
and pesticides, use of high yielding varieties made the green
revolution possible. The word mulch has been probably
derived from the German word “molschmeans soft to decay,
which apparently referred to the use of straw and leaves by
gardeners as a spread over the ground as mulch (Jacks et al.,
1955). Mulches are used for various reasons in agriculture
but water conservation and erosion control are the most
important objectives particularly in arid and semi-arid
regions. Mulching is the process or practice of covering the
soil/ground to make more favourable conditions for plant
growth, development and efficient crop production. Mulch
technical term means ‘covering of soil’. While natural
mulches such as leaf, straw, dead leaves and compost have
been used for centuries, during the last 60 years the advent
of synthetic materials has altered the methods and benefits
of mulching. The research as well as field data available on
effect of synthetic mulches make a vast volume of useful
literature. When compared to other mulches plastic mulches
are completely impermeable to water; it therefore prevents
direct evaporation of moisture from the soil and thus limits
the water losses and soil erosion over the surface. In this
manner it plays a positive role in water conservation. The
suppression of evaporation also has a supplementary effect;
it prevents the rise of water containing salt, which is important
in countries with high salt content water resources. Thus, it
facilitates more retention of soil moisture and helps in control
of temperature fluctuations, improves physical, chemical and
biological properties of soil, as it adds nutrients to the soil
and ultimately enhances the growth and yield of crops (Dilip
Kumar et al., 1990). In addition mulch can effectively
minimize water vapour loss, soil erosion, weed problems
and nutrient loss (Van Derwerken and Wilcox, 1988).
Mulching in improve soil health: Knowledge of the
physical properties of soil is essential for defining and/or
improving soil health to achieve optimal productivity for
each soil/climatic condition. This envisages that for
increasing crop production, soil must be maintained in such
a physical condition so as to allow adequate crop growth.
Unless the soil physical environment is maintained at its
optimum level, the genetic yield potential of a crop cannot
be realized even when all the other requirements are fulfilled.
No doubt, if these soils are managed properly for good
physical health, the yield potential of different crops can be
increased significantly.
Soil temperature: Soil temperature under plastic film is
usually high and also it is based on the color of the plastic
mulches. The black plastic-film mulch ed plots had
significantly lower soil temperature (1 to 2.80 C) than the
clear plastic-film mulched plots. Because much of the solar
energy absorbed by black plastic-film mulch is lost to the
atmosphere through radiation and forced convection (Schales
and Sheldrake,1963). Anikwe et al., (2007) observed that
the unmulched plots had the lowest soil temperature (about
1-3.80 C lower) at different times since planting compared
to plastic film mulched plots. Among different mulching
techniques plastic film mulching increases soil surface
temperature by influencing the heat balance and thus
increased the soil temperature and it also positively
influenced the crop emergence (Aniekwe et al., 2004).
Agricultural Reviews, 38(4) 201 7 : 3 11-315
Print ISSN:0253-14 96 / Online ISSN:09 76-05 39
312 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
Soi l water content: Th e black polyethylene mulch
maintained high soil water contents compared to the control
(no mulch) and the bare soil treatments (Li et al., (2001).
Improvement of the water use efficiency by better utilization
of soil water appears to be the best way to increase grain
yield in the semiarid areas (Zhao et al., 1995). The main
methods of increasing the water use efficiency include
reducing soil water evaporation, and exploiting deep soil
water so as to support shoot biomass accumulation and
optimize the dry matter allocation by selectively increasing
the reproduction (Li et al., 1997, 2000; Li and Zhao, 1997).
The plastic film mulch was promoted root growth and that
more roots were distributed in mid- and deep-soil, so that
the plant can uptake water from the deep soil and increase
the grain yield (Kwabiah, 2004).
Nutrient availability: The decomposition of organic
residues under plastic mulch adds organic acids to the soil
resulting in low soil pH, which may incr eases the
bioavailability of micronutrients (Mn, Zn, Cu, and Fe). This
was also evident from the increased Fe and Zn content in
soil under plastic mulch (Tisdale et al., 1990). The mineral
N content (NO3 and NH4+) in soil is high due to
mineralization of organic N with time, thereby; it increases
the availability of soil nitrogen. Breakdown of organic
material release soluble nutrients like NO3, NH4+, Ca2+,
Mg2+, K+ and fulvic acid to the soil intern increases the
soil nutrient availability under plastic mulch.
Crop growth parameters: Plastic mulch induces the early
crop emergence, so that it increased the biomass production
at early stages of the crop growth. Li et al., (1999) reported
that plastic film mulching leads to earlier seedling emergence
and earlier spike differentiation, which help to develop more
spikelets and more grains per spike in wheat. The
improvement in soil moisture and topsoil temperature under
plastic mulch hastened seedling emergence by 8 days on
average in wheat. Plants in mulching treatments entered the
maturation phase sooner and their maturation period was
longer. This change is favorable to partition assimilate that
is stored in vegetative organs, thus facilitating development
of the reproductive organs of wheat plants. It increases the
duration of repr oductive period so the yield will be
maximized (Li, et al., 2004).
Effect of mulching on weed control: The principle aim of
mulching is to cut off the light to the weeds and to suppress
their growth . Since every type of the mulch covers soil and
performs physical pressure to the weeds.
Biodegradable mulches: Carrubba and Militello, (2013)
presented some environmentally friendly techniques for weed
management, which proved to be efficient to increase seed
yields of cori ander, fennel and psyllium. Although
biodegradable films used in experiment positively affected
yields, they were not capable to suppress weeds. Organic
agriculture also uses some degradable inorganic materials,
such as gravel, which has been used as mulch from almost
forty years now (Fairborn, 1973). Besides the thickness of
this mulch, the gravel different grain size is also examined
(Qiu, e t.al , 2014). Wang et al . 2014 investigated
implementation of gravel-sand mulches in watermelon
production and reported how it in fluen ces the soil
temperature. There are reports on application of many other
organic mulches, such as composted pine bark in Allium
aflatunense (Laskowska et.al, 2012) or pine bark mulch in
Salvia splendens (Blażewicz-Woźniak et.al, 2011). Sawdust
was recommended as effective mulch for acid-loving plants,
such as calla (Wright and Burge 2010) or blueberries (Haynes
and Swift 1986). Straw and other organic mulches, similarly
to composting process, decompose over time through
mineralization process, thus forming humus. Apart from its
primary use as organic fertilizers, compost positively
contribute to the soil structure and is frequently used for
production of various substrates and mulches (Matković,
et.al, 2015).
Non-biodegradable film mulches: Different polypropylene
(PP) black films were tested for efficiency in weed control
and the results proved significant increase in the plants height
(Fontana, et.al 2006). Normally, black and other film colours
are used in a cultivation of strawberry and watermelon, since
they need higher soil temperatures for attaining desired
sweetness. Polara and Viradiya (2013) presented superior
yield and quality features of watermelon produced on silver-
black PE film, although it is quite known that conventional
PE films create a big trouble to the environmental. With
regard to this, Costa et al. (2014) compared efficacy of PE
film with five biodegradable films and proved no significant
differences in productivity and quality of strawberry.
Mulching advantages and disadvantages: The influence
of different mulch types on crop yield might be positive or
negative, related totheir weed suppression effect. Many
researchers proved positive effects of mulching on crop
growth and the obtained yield quantities and qualities
(Ramakrishna, et.al, 2005). Regardless the colour, non-
biodegradable PP and PE films mulches proved to be the
most efficient in preventing of germination of seeds of the
most weeds and their further growth, though they are also
helpful in preventing loss of the moisture from the soil and
in balancing of its temperature (Momirović, et.al, 2010).
Their application frequently bring about many other benefits,
such as reduction of the run-offs, increase in rain water
penetration, control of erosion, correction of the chemical
balance of the soil and reduction of pest and disease damages.
However, they also have some environmental disadvantages,
related to the removal and handling of their waste
(Briassoulis 2006).
Volume 38 Issue 4, December 2017 313
Mulches and insect pest and disease management:
Polyethylene mulches have been used to potential decrease
in insect and disease pests (Lamont, 1993). The influence of
mulches on plant microclimate and energy balance is a
function of transmittance, absorbance, and reflectance of
solar radiation (Ham et al., 1993; Lamont, 2005; Tarara,
2000). Host-seeking behavior of thrips can be disrupted by
incorporating ultraviolet reflectance, thereby reducing thrips
numbers on and around host plants (Brown and Brown, 1992;
Kirk, 1997; Kring and Schuster, 1992; Scott et al., 1989;
Stavisky et al., 2002). The use of highly ultraviolet-reflective
aluminized mulch as a bed covering provides this reflectance
to disrupt initial flights of thrips into a field (Brown and
Brown, 1992; Kring and Schuster, 1992; Scott et al., 1989).
Soil preparation and preplant fertilization: The soil
should be deep plowed or disked at least one month before
bed preparation. Incorporate crop residues well. Remove
all trash, rocks or clods from the field that may hinder the
application of the plastic. Preplant fertilizers can be broadcast
and incorporated into the beds as they are formed. Good
soil moisture (60 to 80% of field capacity) is necessary to
make firm, smooth beds (Granberry, 1994). It is important
that the bed be firm, so the soil doesn’t settle.
Mulch application: Plastic mulch is most efficient when
used in conjunction with drip irrigation. A drip tube can be
applied on the soil surface under the mulch or buried two
inches to three inches beneath the soil surface. Burial reduces
the chance for movement of the tube and for damage that
causes leaks. Either way, the tube must be installed prior to
the mulch. For spring planting, the mulch should be applied
at least seven days ahead of planting to allow time for soil
warming. Soil fumigation can also be accomplished during
mulch application. Fumigation is a specialized operation.
Make plans well ahead of time to allow for equipment
readiness as well as necessary waiting periods between
treatment and planting. Apply the mulch properly to realize
all of the potential benefits for your money. The plastic should
be in continuous contact with the soil, i.e. the bed should be
uniform with no dish shapes to hold the mulch off the soil.
Space between the soil and the mulch interferes with heat transfer
and prevents the soil from warming as quickly and thoroughly.
The edges of the mulch should be secured with a generous
amount of soil. However, do not apply more soil than is needed,
as this makes the mulch more difficult to remove.
Planting: The crop should be planted in the middle of the
bed. Transplants or direct-seeded vegetables can be planted
directly through the plastic with a machine or by hand. Starter
fertilizer solutions generally are applied to transplants to
promote early growth. Fertilize plants midseason by injecting
appropriate soluble fertilizers through the drip line.
Culture and management: Plastic mulch does not eliminate
the need for good cultural practices. On the contrary, more
intensive management is needed to ensure utilization of the
mulch to its greatest advantage. Crops should be observed
regularly for insect build up under the plastic around plant
openings. If the mulch loosens after installation and flaps in
the wind, apply a shovel of soil in the middle of the plastic
at regular intervals down the row to stabilize the mulch. This
can prevent the mulch from blowing off the row or damaging
transplants. Establish and follow a good integrated pest
control management program for the particular crop. Use
good judgment to assess the nutrition status of the plants
and act accordingly.
Removal: After the plastic has served its purpose, i.e.
produced at least one and preferably two or more crops, it
must be removed from the field. The plastic should be
removed as soon as possible after use ceases. Do not allow
the plastic to become overgrown with weeds prior to removal.
The plastic must be removed after the growing season. Do
not disc plastic under. Machines are available commercially
for plastic removal, but they can be expensive. In most cases,
the plastic must be removed by hand and disposed of in a
landfill.
CONCLUSION
In the present scenario of globalization and health
consciousness demand for horticultural crops has increased
world over. Under plastic mulch, soil properties like soil
temperature, moisture content, bulk density, aggregate
stability and nutrient availability improved. Plant growth and
yield are also positively influenced by the plastic mulch due
to the modification of soil microclimate. Even though it has
many advantages, high initial cost, removal and disposal of
plastic materials are some of the limitations experienced by
the farmers. To overcome these limitations photo and
biodegradable plastic mulches can be effectively used for
sustain in g th e produ ctivity as well as controllin g
environmental pollution due to the use of plastics.
REFERENCES
Anikwe M.A.N., Mbah C.N., Ezeaku P.I. and Onyia V.N. (2007): Tillage and plastic mulch effects on soil properties and growth and
yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) on an ultisol in southeastern Nigeria. Soil and Tillage Research, 93: 264–272.
Anikwe, N. L., Okereke, O. U. and Anikwe, M. A. N. (2004). Modulating effect of black plastic mulch on the environment, growth and
yield of cassava in a derived savannah belt of Nigeria. Tropicultura., 22, 185-190.
Bhardwaj, R. L. Meena, C. B. Singh, N. Ojha, S. N. and Dadhich, S. K. (2011). Annual progress report of Krishi Vigyan Kendrs,
Sirohi, MPUAT Udaipur, pp.45-46.
Blażewicz-Woźniak M., Madej J., Rtemi D. and Wartacz W. (2011): The growth and floweringof Salvia splendens Sellow ex Roem.
et Schultunder flowerbed conditions. Acta Agrobotanica, 65(2): 99–108.
314 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
Božiæ D., Filipoviæ V., Matković A., Marković T. and Vrbnićanin S. (2015): Effect of composting on weed seeds survival. VII
Congress on Plant Protectýon, 24-28th November, 2014, Zlatibor, Serbia. Proceedings, pp. 171-174.
Briassoulis D. (2006): Mechanical behaviour of biodegradable agricultural films under real field conditions. Polym er Degradatio n
and Stability, 91: 1256–1272.
Brown, S.L. and Brown, J.E.(1992) Effect of plastic mulch color and insecticide on thrips population and damage to tomato. Hort
Technology 2:208–210
Carrubba A. and Militello M. (2013): Nonchemical weeding of medicinal and aromatic plants. Agronomy for Sustainable Development,
33(3): 551-561.
Costa R., Saraiva A., Carvalho L. and Duarte E. (2014): The use of biodegradable mulch films on strawberry crop in Portugal. Scientia
Horticulturae, 173: 65–70.
Dilip Kumar G., Sachin S. S. and Rajesh Kumar, Importance of mulch in crop production, Indian J. Soil Cons., 18: 20-26 (1990)
Fairborn M. (1973): Effect of gravel mulch on crop yield. Agronomy Journa l, 6 5(6): 925-928.
Fontana E., Hoeberechts J. and Nicola S. (2006): Effect of mulching in medicinal and aromatic plants in organic farm guest houses.
Acta Horticultura e, 723: 405–410.
Granberry, Darbie M., Kelley, William Terry, Chance and Willie O., et al.(1994). Plasticulture for commercial vegetable production.
Cooperative Extension Service, University of Georgia. Bulletin 1108.
Hooks, C. R. R. and Johnson, M. W. (2003). Impact of agricultural diversification on the insect community of cruciferous crops. Crop
Protection, 22: 223-238.
Haynes R. and Swift R. (1986): Effect of soil amen dments and sawdust mulching on growth, yield and leaf nutrient content of
highbush blueberry plants. Scientia Horticulturae, 29(3): 229-238.
Jack C. V., Brind W. D. and Smith R., Mulching Tech. Comm. No. 49, Commnwealth Bulletin of Soil Science (1955)
Jodaugienë D., Pupalienë R., Marcinkevićienë A. and Sinkevićienë A. (2012): Integrated evaluation of the effect of organic mulches
and different mulch layer on agrocenosis. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum: Hortorum Cultus. Lublin, 11(2): 71-81.
Katan, J. (1980). Lutte contre les maladies du Sol a llaide d’um paillis de polyethylene. Plasticulture 46 :2-6.
Kirk, W.D.J.(1997) Distribution, abundance, and population dynamics, p. 217–257. In: Thrips as crop [Lewis, T. (ed.)]. P. CAB
International, Wallingford, UK.
Kring, J.B. and Schuster, D.J.(1992) Management of insects on pepper and tomato with UV-reflective mulches. Fla. Entomol. 85:9–14.
Lamont, W. J. (1999). The use o f different colored mulches for yield and earliness. Proceedings of the New England Vegetable and
Berry Growers Conference and Trade Show, Sturbridge, Mass. p. 299-302.
Lamont, W. J., Sorensen, K.A., and Averre, C.W. (1990). Painting aluminum strips on black plastic mulch reduces mosaic symptoms
on summer squash. Hort Science 25:1305.
Lamont, W.J.(1993) Plastic mulches for the production of vegetable crops. Hort Technology 3:35–39
Lamont, W.J.(2005) Plastics: Modifying the microclimate for the production of vegetable crops. Hort Technolog y 15:477–481.
Laskowska H., Pogroszewska E., Durlak W. and Kozak D. (2012): The effect of bulb planting time and type of mulch on the yield of
Allium aflatunense B. Fedtsch.Acta Agrobotanica, 65 (4): 117–122.
Li FM, Yan X, Wang J, Li ,SQ and Wang T C. (2001a). The mechanism of yield decrease of spring wheat resulted from plastic film
mulching. Agric Sci China 34 :33 -333
Li FM, GuoA H and Wei H. (1999). Effects of plastic film mulch on yield of spring wheat. Field Crops Res 63:79-86
Li F. M., Wang, J., Xu, J.Z., and Xu, H. L., 2004. Productivity and soil reponse to plastic film mulching duration for spring wheat on
entisols in the semiarid loess plateau of China. So il a nd Tillage Research. 78: 9-20
Li F.M., Guo A.H. and Luo M. (1997) Effect of water supply from deep soil on dry matter production of winter wheat. Chin. J. Appl.
Ecol. 8: 575–579.
Matković A., Radanoviæ D., Marković T., Vrbnièanin S., Božić D. (2015): Suzbijanje korova u pitomoj nani (Mentha x piperita )
primenom malèeva. Zbornik rezimea radova XIII savetovanja o zaštiti bilja, Zlatibor, 45.
McCraw, D. and Motes, J. E. 1991. Use of plastic mulch and row covers in veg etable production. Cooperative Extension Service.
Oklahoma State University. OSU Extension Facts F-6034.
Momiroviæ, N., Oljaèa, V.M., Dolijanović, Ž., Poštić, D. (2010): Energetska efikasnost proizvodnje paprike u zaštiæenom prostoru
u funkciji primene razlièitih tipova polietilenskih folija (PE), Poljoprivredna tehnika, 35(3): 1- 13
Muhammad, A. P. Muhammad, I. Khuram, S. and Anwar-UL-Hassan. (2009). Effect of mulch on soil physical properties and NPK
concentration in maize (Zea mays) shoots under two tillage system. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 11:120-124.
Polara P. and Viradiya R. (2013): Effect of mulching material on growth, yield and quality of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb)
Cv. Kiran. Universal Journa l of Agricultural Research, 1(2): 30-37.
Qiu Y., Xie Z., Wang Y., Ren J. and Malhi S. (2014): Influence of gravel mulch stratum thickness and gravel grain size on evaporation
resistance. Journal of Hydrolog y, 519: 1908-1913.
Ramakrishna A.,Tam H.,Wani S. and Long T. (2005): Effect of mulch on soil temperature, moisture, weed infestation and yield of
ground nut in northern Vietnam. Field Crops Research, 95(2-3): 115-125.
Sanderson K. and Cutcliffe J. (1991): Effect of sawdust mulch on yields of select clones of lowbush blueberry. Canadian Journal of
Plant Science, 71(4):1263-1266.
Sarolia, D. K. and Bhardwaj, R. L. (2012). Effect of mulching on crop production under rainfed condition: A review. Int. J. Res.
Chem. Environ., 2: 8-20.
Volume 38 Issue 4, December 2017 315
Schales, F. Agricultural plastics use in the United States. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Plastics in Agriculture.
1990, 54-56.
Scott, S.J., McLeod, P.J., Montgomery, F.W. and Handler, C.A.(1989) Influence of reflective mulch on incidence of thrips (Thysanoptera:
Thripidae:Phlaeothripidae) in staked tomatoes. J. Entomol. Sci. 24:422–427.
Sharma R.R. and Sharma V.P., (2003): Mulch influences fruit growth, albinism and fruit quality in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa
Duch.). Fruits, 58: 221-227.
Singh R., Sharma R. and Goyal R. (2007): Interacting effects of planting time and mulching on “Chandeler” strawberry (Fragaria ×
anana ssa Duch.). Scienta Horticulturae, 111: 344–351.
Stavisky, J., Funderburk, J.E., Brodbeck, B.V., Olson, S.M. and Andersen, P.C. (2002) Population dynamics of Frankliniella spp. and
tomato spotted wilt incidence as influenced by cultural management in tomato. J. Econ. Entomol. 95: 1216–1221.
Tarara, J.M. (2000) Microclimate modifications of plastic mulch. HortScience 35:169–180
Tisdale, S.L., Nelson, W.L. and Beaton, J.D. (1985) Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. 4th Edition, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
Van Derwerken, J. E. and Wilcox, L. D. (1988). Influence of plastic mulch and type and frequency of irrigation on growth and yield
of bell pepper. Horticultural Science, 23: 985-988.
Wang Y., Xie Z., Malhi S., Vera C. and Zhang Y. (2014): Gravel-sand mulch thickness effects on soil temperature, evaporation, water
use efficiency and yield of watermelon in semi-arid Loess Plateau, China. Acta Ecolog ica Sinica, 34(5): 261-265.
Wright P. and Burge G. (2010): Irrigation, sawdust mulch, and Enhance® biocide affects soft rot incidence, and flower and tuber
production of calla New Zealand. Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 28(3): 225-231.
Zhao, S L, Li, F M and Wang, J. 1995. Discussion on development of water-harvested agriculture in semi-arid region Northwest China.
Acta Botan Boreali-Occidental Sin, 15: 9–12.
... Mulching is the process or practice of covering the soil/ground to make more favorable conditions for plant growth, development and efficient crop production. While natural mulches such as leaf, straw, dead leaves and compost have been used for centuries, during the last 60 years the advent of synthetic materials has altered the methods and benefits of mulching (Sharma and Bhardwaj, 2017) [12] . Microbial inoculants, also known as biofertilizers, are organic products that contain specific microorganisms obtained from plant roots and root zones. ...
... Mulching is the process or practice of covering the soil/ground to make more favorable conditions for plant growth, development and efficient crop production. While natural mulches such as leaf, straw, dead leaves and compost have been used for centuries, during the last 60 years the advent of synthetic materials has altered the methods and benefits of mulching (Sharma and Bhardwaj, 2017) [12] . Microbial inoculants, also known as biofertilizers, are organic products that contain specific microorganisms obtained from plant roots and root zones. ...
... The low consumptive use of crop might be due to use of plastic mulch. Plastic mulch limits water loss by preventing rapid evaporation from the soil surface (Sharma and Bhardwaj, 2017). In this study, a similar amount of irrigation water was applied at constant discharge rate (2.2 litres/h) in both the drip irrigation methods to maintain adequate soil moisture in the proximity of root zone for better crop growth and water productivity. ...
Article
Drip irrigation and mulching were tested to minimize unproductive water loss through evaporation and weed interference. A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2020 and 2021 in split plot design with three replications. The study includes six treatment combinations of drip irrigation methods (surface drip and subsurface drip irrigation) and mulching (black plastic, paddy straw and no mulch) along with one conventional furrow irrigation without mulching (as control) in main plots. Four weed control treatments (atrazine 1000 g a.i./ha as pre-emergence, two hand weedings at 30 and 60 days after sowing [DAS], weed free and weedy for whole crop growth period) were kept in the subplots. The combination of drip irrigation and mulches significantly enhanced leaf area index and crop biomass at 60 DAS than furrow irrigation. Integration of subsurface drip irrigation with plastic mulching resulted in the lowest weed density and biomass among main plots. Drip irrigation coupled with plastic and straw mulching resulted in 86 and 50% reduction in weed density and biomass, respectively, as compared to no mulching. Integration of subsurface drip with paddy straw mulch and black plastic mulch resulted in 17.1 and 15.5% higher maize grain yield, respectively, as compared to furrow irrigation. The highest irrigation water productivity (3.58 kg/m3) was observed in combination of subsurface drip and paddy straw mulch followed by combination of subsurface drip and black plastic mulch (3.51 kg/m3). Overall, straw mulching in drip irrigation system proved economical in terms of maize productivity.
... While plastic mulch offers various benefits like water conservation and erosion control, cost and environmental concerns arise. Biodegradable plastic mulch adoption can address these issues, preserving productivity and reducing environmental pollution (Sharma and Bhardwaj, 2017). Another ecological factor contributing to recent declines in garlic yield is climate anomalies, such as El Niño and La Niña, which result in smaller bulbs due to adverse weather conditions. ...
Article
Full-text available
Sustainable agriculture involves complex interactions among social, economic, and ecological dimensions, each with distinct interests and goals. Achieving sustainable agricultural development is challenging and requires a comprehensive response. This study focuses on Indonesia’s garlic production, employing a systems thinking approach to provide a holistic understanding of the interconnected factors influencing sustainable agricultural systems. We utilized the first two steps of the five-step systems thinking methodology—problem articulation and the formulation of dynamic hypotheses. This process involved developing a causal loop diagram (CLD) to represent the dynamic hypotheses and identifying system archetypes to determine leverage and potential intervention points. Our analysis identified three system archetypes—Drifting Goals, Fixes that Fail, and Limit to Growth—as key patterns influencing the sustainability of garlic production. The Drifting Goals archetype reveals that efforts to boost local garlic stock in Indonesia are hindered by the allocation of garlic for seeds, due to the lack of a clear distinction between garlic for consumption and seed. The Fixes that Fail archetype illustrates the long-term detrimental effects of short-term agricultural practices, such as the overuse of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. The Limit to Growth archetype underscores the critical need for enhanced market access and a shift in consumer preferences to sustain garlic farming. To address these challenges, we recommend establishing clear distinctions between garlic for consumption and seed production, developing the seed industry, promoting integrated pest management, and reducing reliance on chemical inputs through environmentally friendly technology. Additionally, ensuring market and price stability is vital to maintain farmers’ interest in garlic cultivation. Therefore, the government should prioritize market penetration for local garlic and consistently enforce import restrictions to ensure the sustainability of garlic production in Indonesia.
... It is very rich in minerals (2.70 per cent) such as calcium (452 mg/1000g) and iron (3.90 mg/100g) [2] Mulching is the process or practice of covering the soil/ground to make more favorable conditions for plant growth, development and efficient crop production. While natural mulches such as leaf, straw, dead leaves and compost have been used for centuries, during the last 60 years the advent of synthetic materials has altered the methods and benefits of mulching [3,4]. ...
Article
Full-text available
A field experiment was conducted at Himalayan University farm, Jullang, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, during the kharif season of 2023 with 8 treatments replicated thrice in randomized block design, to determine the effect of different types of mulching and biofertilizer on yield of finger millet (Eleusine coracana.). The available nutrient status showed high nitrogen (N), low phosphorus (P), and medium potassium (K) levels. The experiment included the following treatments T1-Control, T2- Karanj leaf mould at + Azotobacter, T3-Karanj leaf mould + PSB, T4- Neem leaf mould + Azotobacter, T5-Paddy straw + jute bag + Rhizobium, T6-Paddy straw + PSB, T7-Black polythene + Azotobacter and T8-Saw dust + Rhizobium. The highest finger length (cm) recorded was 5.92 cm at harvest, highest test weight (g) recorded was 3.06 g at harvest, highest grain yield (t ha-1) recorded was 4.05 t ha-1 at harvest, highest straw yield (t ha-1) recorded was 7.92 t ha-1 at harvest and harvest index (%) of 34.66 % at harvest were observed with treatment T5 - Paddy straw + jute bag + Rhizobium.
... The quality and quantity of animal feed are directly influenced by several factors which includes health of the soil (Silver et al., 2021), selected crops, irrigation and fertilization regime (Ul-Allah et al., 2014). Sustainable soil management practices such as reduced tillage and mulching contribute to improved soil health (Sharma and Bhardwaj, 2017), increased crop yields and higher-quality animal feed production (Al-Samin et al., 2022). There exists a direct link between tillage and mulching practices and the production of animal feed (Molata et al., 2023). ...
Article
Background: Integrated management of soil, water and nutrient resources is critical in improving animal feed production sustainably as it is highly resource demanding. Barley is considered as an excellent choice for animal feed owing to its rich nutritional composition, energy content, palatability, versatility and economic feasibility. Implementing sustainable crop management practices that improve soil health as well as enhance water and nitrogen availability is critical for improving crop productivity and ensuring improved animal feed production in these challenging environments. In arid regions with scarce water resources and less fertile soil, an interplay between water availability and nitrogen fertilization plays a significant role in enhancing barley production. Thus adoption of conservation agricultural practices coupled with optimized irrigation and fertilization regime is crucial in establishing sustainable animal feed production in the region. However, much insight is not delivered in the area of interactive effects of irrigation and fertilization with conservational agricultural practices on sustainable intensification of animal feed production in arid and semi-arid lands. The study investigated the interactive effect of tillage, mulching, irrigation and nitrogen application rates on growth and yield performance of barley under Kuwait’s environmental conditions. Methods: The study was conducted at KISR Station for Research and Innovation-KSRI (29.3156°N, 47.8403°E), Kuwait. The effect of tillage and mulching on the growth and yield performance of barley was evaluated under combinations of three different irrigation (100% ETc, 75% ETc and 50% ETc) and fertilization application rates (0 kg/ha, 50 kg/ha and 100 kg/ha). Split-split plot experimental design was employed with three replications to study the effect of different treatments on plant height, number of plants per square meter, spike length, number of spikes per square meter, biomass yield, grain weight, harvest index and residue yield. Result: Tillage, mulching, irrigation and fertilization application rates imposed a significant interaction effect on barley biomass and grain yield. Minimum tilled plots with mulching under 100% ETc irrigation and 100 kgN/ha recorded the highest biomass and residue yield. For grain yield, minimum as well as conventional tillage with mulching produced the highest value under 100% ETc irrigation and 50 kgN/ha. Highest plant height and number of spikes per square meter was noted in plots with minimum tillage and mulching under 100% ETc irrigation.
Article
Full-text available
The intensive and repeated use of chemical herbicides has led to the emergence of herbicide-resistant weeds, which, in addition to their environmental impacts, also pose significant threats to human and animal health. This study aimed to explore the potential of oilseed industrial wastes, specifically soybean and flaxseed meals, as safe and environmentally friendly bioherbicides for controlling weeds associated with onion crops. Two field experiments were conducted along two successive winter of 2020/21 and 2021/22. Treatments involved foliar spray of soybean and flaxseed meals in three different concentrations (15, 30 and 45%), mulching of seed meals, oxyfluorfen herbicide, two hand hoeing and untreated weedy check. The findings demonstrated that all weed control treatments significantly reduced weed density, biomass and nutrient uptake. Two hand hoeing, oxyfluorfen herbicide and the mulching of soybean and flaxseed meals alternated in the top rank for weed control, showing minimal significant differences among them. Following these effective treatments, soybean meal extracts at 45 and 30% exhibited notable weed control compared to the weedy check. The greatest enhancement in onion growth, yield characteristics and bulb quality was observed with the application of hand hoeing, soybean and flaxseed meal mulching treatments, with no significant differences between them. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) fractionation of both meals identified various phenolic acids at different concentrations. Practically, these safe efficient treatments proved progress on chemical herbicide. Hence, onion farmers are advised to apply soybean and flaxseed meals mulching safe treatments as alternative to harmful chemical herbicides under all experimental conditions.
Article
Sugarcane, recognized as one of the most water-demanding crops globally, relies on ample water from either rainfall or irrigation to attain maximum productivity and profitability. Meanwhile, the amount of fresh water available per person is steadily diminishing due to rising demands from residential, industrial, and agricultural sectors. Given the dwindling groundwater reserves amid climate change and various other sustainability issues, numerous technological interventions have been proposed by researchers to improve crop and water productivity of sugarcane. Implementing the interventions, such as selecting water-efficient cultivars, optimizing planting techniques, employing micro-irrigation systems particularly subsurface drip irrigation and AI-driven sensor-based optimized and automated irrigation scheduling, can be a judicious choice. Additionally, ensuring eco-friendly straw mulching, practicing efficient nutrient management, and promoting legume intercropping contribute to better soil health and sustainable cane yield. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the innovative technologies as effective solutions to diminish energy, water and carbon footprints in sugarcane production. These novel practices enable sugarcane as an efficient rain water harvesting crop rather than a water guzzler in the sub-tropics. The ultimate goal is to foster overall growth, improve yield and produce quality canes, ultimately enhancing the livelihoods of sugarcane farmers and minimize environmental impacts.
Article
Full-text available
The present experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2020 and 2021 at College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, Rajasthan to determine the effect of sowing technique, mulching, and NPK foliar fertilization on growth, yield, and yield attributes of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] in arid circumstances. Experiment consisted of 3 sowing methods, viz. direct seed sowing (45 cm × 15 cm); 2-week-old seedling (60 cm × 22.5 cm); and 4-week-old seedling (60 cm × 22.5 cm) transplanting; and 3 mulches, viz. no mulch; dust mulch; and straw mulch assigned to main-plot and 2 levels of NPK foliar fertilization [control and NPK @1% foliar spray at 35 and 50 DAS (days after sowing)] assigned to sub-plot. Results showed that transplanting 4-week-old seedlings led to significantly higher plant height (170.1 cm), dry-matter accumulation (133.6 g), total and effective tillers (3.41 and 3.14), ear head length (24 cm), ear head girth (2.28 cm), weight of ear head (31.5 g), grains/ear (1964), weight of grains/ear (18.9 g), comparable to 2-week seedling transplanting. The grain yield (2396 kg/ha) and straw yield (6640 kg/ha) were significantly superior with 4-week-old seedlings over 2-week seedling by 8.2, 5.4% on pooled basis. Straw mulch exhibited superior most for growth and yield parameters, followed by dust mulch. Additionally, NPK @1% foliar spray at 35 and 50 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height (170.5 cm), dry-matter accumulation (131.6 g), ear head length (23.7 cm), ear head girth (2.27 cm), weight of ear head (31.1 g), grains/ear (1921), weight of grains/ear (18.5 g), compared to the control. The grain yield (2303 kg/ha) and straw yield (6548 kg/ha) were significantly superior with NPK @1% by 9.5% and 11% over control. In conclusion, the combination of transplanting 4-week-old seedlings, straw mulch and NPK @1% foliar spray offering a potential solution for enhancing agricultural productivity in the region.
Chapter
The growing global concern over environmental degradation and resource depletion has prompted the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices as a means to reduce agricultural waste. This chapter presents an approach to address the issue of agricultural waste by implementing sustainable agricultural practices. By emphasising the utilisation of organic farming techniques, integrated pest management, crop rotation, and efficient irrigation methods, this approach aims to optimise resource use, minimise chemical inputs, and enhance soil health. This chapter discusses the potential benefits of these practices, including reduced reliance on synthetic fertilisers and pesticides, increased biodiversity, improved water conservation, and enhanced long-term agricultural productivity. Drawing from case studies and scientific research, the approach underscores the importance of education and awareness among farmers, policymakers, and consumers to promote adopting these sustainable practices. As global food demand continues to rise, adopting this approach holds promise for mitigating agricultural waste, conserving natural resources, and ensuring food security in an environmentally responsible manner.
Article
Full-text available
A field study was designed to evaluate the effects of various irrigation methods, raised beds, and plastic mulch on yield and fruit quality of bell pepper ( Capsicum annuum L.) Irrigation was scheduled on the basis of soil matric potential and monitored by Hg manometer tensiometers and soil moisture blocks. Trickle-irrigated plots were watered at soil matric potentials of −0.025 and −0.075 MPa, and sprinkled plots at −0.075 MPa. The combination of black polyethylene mulch and irrigation produced maximum yields, but frequency of irrigation had little effect on yield when peppers were mulched. High frequency trickle irrigation (irrigated 15×) and trickle irrigation of a lesser frequency (irrigated 5×) resulted in similar yields when peppers were mulched. The use of mulch without irrigation had a large effect on yield: yields from plots that were mulched but not irrigated were similar to yields from plots that were sprinkler-irrigated but not mulched. The percentage of marketable fruit was substantially reduced in the absence of irrigation or mulch, because of the high incidence of both solar injury and blossom-end rot.
Article
Full-text available
The Medicinal and Aromatic Plant (MAP) cultivation enters in a concept of rusticity and rediscovery of ancient traditions. Recently, MAP cultivation has been spreading in the marginal areas of the Piedmont Region (Italy). This can encourage the diversification of agricultural production and the conversion of current farms into farm guest houses. The creation of an array based on aromatic plants (i.e. infusions, liquors, cooking spices, fragrances) could introduce autochthonous and novel MAP cultivation and give an added value of the areas. The present research consisted of introducing MAP cultivation, according to the dictates of organic farming, in farm guest houses of the Pellice Valley in Piedmont. The experiments lasted from 2001 to 2004, testing two different polypropylene black mulches for weed control of rosemary, thyme and lavender cultivations in two sites, Rorà and Bibiana. Periodical samplings of plant growth consisted of canopy diameter and height measurements; visual observations were made to determine lifespan of the tested mulches. Results indicated that mulching technique favoured plant growth. At the Rorà site, thyme and lavender diameter was positively influenced by mulching. At the Bibiana site, the strong weed presence limited lateral plant development of thyme and rosemary, enhancing their growth height. For all the species considered in both sites no differences were found between the two types of polypropylene mulch tested.
Article
Thrips were sampled in a commercial tomato field in southeast Arkansas with yellow sticky traps. The effect of the type of mulch used (black plastic, aluminum-painted plastic or no mulch) on aerial thrips population abundance was investigated. Thrips species identified included Frankliniella fusca (Hinds), F. tritici (Fitch), Sericothrips variabilis (Beech), Leptothrips mali (Fitch) and Haplothrips graminis Hood; F. fusca and F. tritici were most numerous. Aluminum-painted mulch was most effective in reducing the numbers of thrips captured, while black plastic was more effective than no mulch. Numbers of F. fusca peaked at five weeks after transplanting; however, numbers of thirps were low in all plots for the first three weeks after transplanting. Peak numbers of F. fusca trapped in the aluminum-painted plots were one-third the numbers in non-mulched plots, while numbers in the black plastic plots were intermediate. Effectiveness of the mulch in decreasing the numbers of thrips generally disappeared later in the season, as lower leaves shaded the mulch, and traps were raised to accommodate increasing plant height.
Article
Numerous studies have examined the responses of pest and beneficial arthropods to plant diversification in ephemeral cropping habitats. Cruciferous crops, mainly cabbage and broccoli, are probably the most studied plants with respect to evaluating the impact of plant mixtures on insect population dynamics. This review examines the mechanisms influencing arthropod responses to floral diversification, specifically focusing on cruciferous crops. In many instances, mechanisms accounting for herbivores and natural enemy responses to plant mixtures are not thoroughly tested. Biological parameters of herbivores impacted by crop diversification were mainly related to the behavior of the insects studied. Mechanisms accounting for herbivore responses to plant mixtures include reduced colonization, reduced adult tenure time in the marketable crop, and oviposition interference. Tactics used for choosing companion plants, and the future perspective for mixed-crucifer crops usage are discussed. Manipulative studies involving cruciferous crops provide some evidence that habitat manipulation techniques (e.g., intercropping, undersown nonhost plants, vegetation borders) impact crop growth. However, the indirect role habitat manipulation plays in the population dynamics of insect pests and natural enemies still remains unclear in many systems. Quantitative data are needed to determine the level of change in plant quality brought about by companion planting that alters arthropod behavior.