... These conceptualizations often stem from different theories and their assumptions about elicitors of the effect (Diel & MacDorman, 2021). They include 1. a function like Mori's graph that maps a given degree of human likeness to a level of affect (Bartneck et al., 2009a;Burleigh, Schoenherr, & Lacroix, 2013;Chen, Russel, Nakayama, & Livingstone, 2010;Gray & Wegner, 2012;Kätsyri, de Gelder, & Takala, 2019;Lin et al, 2021;Ramey, 2005;Sasaki, Ihaya, & Yamada, 2017;Schneider, Wang, & Yang, 2009;Schwind et al., 2018;Seyama & Nagayama, 2007); 2. deviations from norms of human appearance and movement (Chaminade, Hodgins, & Kawato, 2007;MacDorman & Ishiguro, 2006;Mathur & Reichling, 2016;Palomäki et al., 2018;Seyama & Nagayama, 2007;Tinwell & Grimshaw, 2009;Tinwell, Grimshaw, & Nabi, 2014); 3. violations of expectations of human appearance and behavior (Bartneck et al., 2009a;MacDorman & Ishiguro, 2006); 4. sensitivity to nonhuman features that increases with an entity's human likeness Green, MacDorman, Ho, & Vasudevan, 2008;MacDorman, Srinivas, & Patel, 2013); 5. a mismatch between human and nonhuman features (Ho & MacDorman, 2010;MacDorman, Green, Koch, & Ho, 2009;Mitchell et al., 2011b;Moore, 2012;Takahashi, Fukuda, Samejima, Watanabe, & Ueda, 2015;Tinwell & Sloan, 2014); 6. entities that elicit the concept human but have nonhuman traits (Steckenfinger & Ghazanfar, 2009); and 7. difficulty distinguishing between categories, such as human and robot, or a conflict between categories (Cheetham, Pavlović, Jordan, Suter, & Jäncke, 2013;Cheetham, Suter, & Jäncke, 2011, 2014Cheetham, Wu, Pauli, & Jäncke, 2015;. ( ...