ArticlePublisher preview available

An AFFIRMative Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Transgender Youth: Preliminary Effectiveness

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Authentically expressing and navigating a transgender or gender nonconforming identity during adolescence can be a difficult and painful process. Using a transgender affirmative approach to clinical practice, psychologists and other mental health professionals can play a key role in supporting youth through this process. To date, there is a paucity of research exploring the impact of transgender affirmative interventions on well-being. The primary objective of this article is to present the results of a pilot study exploring the preliminary effectiveness and acceptability of AFFIRM, an affirmative cognitive–behavioral coping skills group intervention with transgender youth. This article will also describe transgender-specific considerations for delivering transgender affirmative interventions. The transgender subsample (N = 8) of participants in the study were between the ages of 16 and 18 and represented a diversity of intersecting racial/ethnic, sexual, and gender identities. Results indicate that AFFIRM was effective in significantly decreasing depression scores, and changes persisted through the 3-month follow-up. While changes in coping were not statistically significant, scores trended in a positive direction. Data indicate favorable responses to AFFIRM among transgender participants across a variety of dimensions of satisfaction. While findings are preliminary, they are promising, addressing a critical gap in intervention research aimed at decreasing depression and improving coping among transgender youth. Future controlled studies are needed to explore the efficacy of AFFIRM with larger samples of transgender youth.
An AFFIRMative Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Transgender
Youth: Preliminary Effectiveness
Ashley Austin, Shelley L. Craig, and Sandra A. D’Souza
Barry University School of Social Work
Authentically expressing and navigating a transgender or gender nonconforming identity during adoles-
cence can be a difficult and painful process. Using a transgender affirmative approach to clinical practice,
psychologists and other mental health professionals can play a key role in supporting youth through this
process. To date, there is a paucity of research exploring the impact of transgender affirmative
interventions on well-being. The primary objective of this article is to present the results of a pilot study
exploring the preliminary effectiveness and acceptability of AFFIRM, an affirmative cognitive–
behavioral coping skills group intervention with transgender youth. This article will also describe
transgender-specific considerations for delivering transgender affirmative interventions. The transgender
subsample (N8) of participants in the study were between the ages of 16 and 18 and represented a
diversity of intersecting racial/ethnic, sexual, and gender identities. Results indicate that AFFIRM was
effective in significantly decreasing depression scores, and changes persisted through the 3-month
follow-up. While changes in coping were not statistically significant, scores trended in a positive
direction. Data indicate favorable responses to AFFIRM among transgender participants across a variety
of dimensions of satisfaction. While findings are preliminary, they are promising, addressing a critical
gap in intervention research aimed at decreasing depression and improving coping among transgender
youth. Future controlled studies are needed to explore the efficacy of AFFIRM with larger samples of
transgender youth.
Public Significance Statement
Our study examined the preliminary effectiveness of AFFIRM, an affirmative coping skills inter-
vention for transgender youth. Results indicate that transgender participants were highly satisfied
with the AFFIRM intervention and that it reduced their depression. Given the elevated risk of
depression, distress and suicide among transgender youth, the AFFIRM program holds promise for
improving well-being.
Keywords: affirmative, transgender, cognitive behavior therapy, outcomes
Over the last decade, mental and behavioral health researchers
and clinicians began to pay increasing attention to the mental
health care needs and experiences of transgender and gender
nonconforming youth populations. Transgender is an inclusive
term used to refer to individuals whose gender identity is not
consistent with social and cultural gender expectations associated
This article was published Online First November 30, 2017.
ASHLEY AUSTIN received her MSW and PhD in Social Welfare from
Florida International University. She is currently an Associate Professor at
Barry University School of Social Work and Distinguished Professor for
the Center for Human Rights and Social Justice. Her research and clinical
practice interests revolve around advancing well-being among transgender
and gender diverse individuals, with particular emphasis on the develop-
ment, testing and dissemination of affirmative practice approaches for the
transgender community.
SHELLEY L. CRAIG received her PhD in Social Welfare from Florida
International University. She is currently the Associate Dean, Academic
and an Associate Professor at the Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work
at the University of Toronto and the Canada Research Chair in Sexual and
Gender Minority Youth (SGMY). Her areas of research and professional
interest include sexual and gender minorities, cognitive– behavioral ther-
apy, information and communication technologies, clinical practice and
implementation science.
SANDRA A. D’SOUZA received her HBSc in human biology and health
studies from the University of Toronto Scarborough. She is currently a
Master of Public Health Student at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health
at the University of Toronto, specializing in Social and Behavioural Health
Sciences (Health Promotion). Her areas of professional interest include
public health policy, health equity, youth engagement, and social determi-
nants of health.
THE AUTHORS WOULD LIKE TO THANK the transgender youth who partic-
ipated in AFFIRM and whose authenticity, courage, insight, and feedback
will continue to guide our work. We would also like to acknowledge the
efforts of the diligent and committed members of the AFFIRM research
and clinical team.
CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS ARTICLE should be addressed to
Ashley Austin, Barry University School of Social Work, 11300
NE 2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, FL 33161. E-mail: aaustin@barry
.edu
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice © 2017 American Psychological Association
2018, Vol. 49, No. 1, 1–8 0735-7028/18/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pro0000154
1
... Given the adverse effects of structural stigma on LGBTQ+ youth mental health, interventions addressing potentially modifiable minority stressors-such as internalized stigma-may help support LGBTQ+ youth's mental health. Several studies have explored the use of psychosocial interventions tailored specifically for LGBTQ+ adolescents (e.g., such as affirmative CBT interventions adapted to address minority stress that faced by LGBTQ+ community (Craig and Austin, 2016;Pachankis, Soulliard, Layland, et al., 2023) and found significant decreases in internalized stigma (Pachankis, Soulliard, Layland, et al., 2023), depression (Austin et al., 2018;Craig and Austin, 2016;Lucassen et al., 2015) and suicidal ideation (Diamond et al., 2012) post-intervention. In addition, Project RISE, a digital singlesession intervention (SSI) based on principles of affirmative CBT (Pachankis, Soulliard, Layland, et al., 2023) and specifically designed to focus on minority stress among LGBTQ+ adolescents, successfully improved post-intervention internalized stigma, identity pride, hopelessness, as well as internalized stigma at two-week follow up, relative to a psychoeducation control (Shen et al., 2023). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
In the United States, the experience of minority stress among LGBTQ+ youth varies across regions with high and low levels of stigma (e.g., laws, policies and cultural norms that limit the lives of individuals with stigmatized identities). Some evidence suggests that stigma can undermine response to individual-level psychosocial interventions among youth, creating a need to identify factors that may buffer against minority stressors’ effects in high-stigma contexts. Social support may be one such factor. Therefore, among LGBTQ+ youth who received a digital, single-session intervention (SSI) focused on minority stress, we investigated whether structural and internalized stigma and social support predicted intervention response, independently or interactively. Specifically, we predicted that LGBTQ+ youth in environments characterized by high stigma would report weaker SSI responses. Further, we predicted that LGBTQ+ youth who perceived higher social support would report stronger SSI responses. We also tested structural stigma and social support as moderators. Using data from a previously-completed randomized evaluation, we analyzed data from 244 LGBTQ+ adolescents, aged 13 to 16 years, across 181 counties in 46 U.S. states, who engaged with the SSI. We created a factor representing structural stigma using confirmatory factor analysis at the county level. No evidence emerged for structural stigma or social support as a moderator of intervention effects on internalized stigma, identity pride, or mental health-related outcomes, either at post-intervention or at two-week follow up. Results speak to the potentially broad utility of the SSI tested in this trial for LGBTQ+ youth with limited access to mental health support.
... Algunas de las investigaciones a las que hacen referencia en su revisión son las de Proujansky y Panchankis (2014), centradas en mejorar las estrategias de afrontamiento del colectivo a través de una guía compuesta por ocho principios entre los cuales podemos citar: normalizar el impacto del estrés en la salud mental de la comunidad, facilitar la conciencia, regulación y aceptación de las emociones, disminuir el aislamiento social, etc. En la misma línea, Craig et al. (2021) plantean que es prioritaria la educación, para identificar y manejar estados afectivos y la práctica a través de ensayos conductuales de reafirmación del cambio tanto dentro como fuera de sesión. El artículo de Austin et al. (2018) también lo reflejan en su revisión indicando la eficacia de la Terapia Cognitivo Conductual ya que las puntuaciones en depresión disminuyeron incluso después de tres meses de seguimiento, además de ayudarle para hacer frente a situaciones estresantes por las que el grupo de jóvenes habían estado intentando afrontar a lo largo de su vida. No obstante, los mismos autores de la revisión indican que en este estudio la muestra no fue altamente significativa. ...
Article
Full-text available
La Disforia de género ha sido tratada desde diferentes enfoques terapéuticos. Algunos síntomas como la angustia psicológica, la depresión y la ideación suicida son frecuentes cuando existe una marcada incongruencia entre el sexo que uno siente o expresa y el que se le asigna. El objetivo del presente trabajo es estudiar las características de los distintos enfoques resaltando las principales diferencias y valorando los resultados de su aplicación haciendo un breve recorrido desde las terapias que comenzaron a aplicarse, como las Terapias de conversión, hasta las más actuales como los Nuevos Modelos de atención, teniendo en cuenta la opinión de los diferentes autores al respecto. A modo de conclusión podemos decir que nos encontramos ante un dilema ya que, por un lado, parece que el enfoque afirmativo está teniendo buenos resultados, aunque carece de estándares científicos y profesionales en su aplicación y por otro lado, en los nuevos Modelos de atención no se contempla la valoración psicológica como paso previo a la intervención médica.
Article
Background Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people have a higher risk of poor mental health in comparison to cisgendered heterosexual young people, and they underutilise mental health services and support. In addition, there is a paucity of research conducted in United Kingdom examining mental health early intervention provision for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people. Objectives To produce a model of what works for early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people and increase understanding of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people’s access to, navigation of, and engagement with mental health support. Method This was a multi-methods theory-led case study evaluation with three distinct stages: (1) a meta-narrative review of existing literature to develop a theoretical framework to explain effective mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people; (2) an online and offline service mapping exercise to locate current mental health early intervention support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people in the United Kingdom in order to produce a service typology; and (3) a theory-led case study evaluation of 12 case study sites selected from the service typology produced in stage 2, to establish the components of appropriate quality, early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people. Results Stage 1 produced an interdisciplinary theoretical framework indicating that early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus youth must prioritise addressing normative environments that marginalise youth, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus identities and mental health problems. Stage 2 mapping found 111 services, the majority in urban settings in England. There was an absence of mainstream National Health Service support that specifically addressed the needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people. The majority of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus youth mental health support was provided by voluntary/community organisations. Stage 3 case study evaluation found that an intersectional, youth-rights approach is the most appropriate way to deliver early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people. Youth rights should underpin mental health support to address the multiple marginalisation, isolation and stigmatisation that lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people may experience and to enable them to make informed independent decisions about their own bodies and lives, and for the right to freedom of safe self-expression to be upheld. The model that we have produced contains 13 principles that are necessary to the provision of mental health support, and to improve access to, engagement with, and navigation of mental health services. Conclusions In the United Kingdom, a rights-based approach to mental health service provision is not prominent. In addition, at the time of writing, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people are facing active legislative and policy attacks on their human rights. This study provides the first large-scale theory-led evaluation of early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people with common mental health problems. The resulting intersectional, youth-rights approach provides evidence on ways of improving lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people’s mental health. Further research on the implementation of an intersectional, youth-rights approach to early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people with mental health problems is required. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019135722. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/09/04) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research ; Vol. 12, No. 47. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Article
In brief There are some unique aspects to providing trauma-informed reproductive care to transgender and nonbinary people, who are affected by minority stress, stigma, and particular forms of trauma; we review the evidence and suggest strategies for the provision of trauma-informed reproductive care to gender minorities. Abstract Stigma and minority stress affect the health of transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) people, leading to disparities across a range of outcomes. Barriers to accessing care, including reproductive care, further complicate these health disparities. Interpersonal stigma within the healthcare system, and high rates of physical and sexual violence survivorship, make TGNB people particularly vulnerable to healthcare trauma and poor care. This is particularly true among TGNB people with multiple intersecting marginalized identities. Trauma-informed care provides a framework for medical practitioners to provide safe, holistic, and sensitive care. Scant academic literature discusses trauma-informed reproductive care for TGNB individuals. We present a narrative review of the evidence for trauma-informed reproductive care for TGNB people and suggest potential application and implementation.
Article
Full-text available
Background Despite a minority stress-related higher risk to develop mental health difficulties, and problematic access to and treatment from healthcare providers, research into LGBTQ+ mental health support is limited. The aims of this systematic review were to explore evidence-based cognitive and/or behavioural interventions and adaptations targeting mental health in LGBTQ+ populations, before providing recommendations for future clinical and research directions. Method Six databases were searched in February-March 2022 and risk of bias evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2/ROBINS-I tools. A narrative synthesis following the PICOS framework and the review questions was used to examine the results. Results Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including various interventions and adaptations, mental health difficulties, and other emotion- and minority stress-related processes/constructs. Risk of bias was judged as high, and critical/serious, respectively, in all studies. Outcomes included improvements in symptoms of depression (most statistically/clinically significant effects/large effect sizes), and anxiety, emotion regulation, and internalised homophobia in the pre-post studies. Conclusion Cognitive/behavioural interventions and adaptations for LGBTQ+ populations feature a range of therapeutic modalities and levels of adaptation, with largely positive effects, in the context of limited and heterogenous literature and risk of bias concerns, as well as limitations related to publication bias and inclusion criteria of the current work. Suggestions for future clinical and research directions include a focus on generic therapeutic competencies and metacompetencies, and affirmative, potentially more holistic approaches, as well as more consistency in methodology, more focus on underserved LGBTQ+ populations and intersectionality, and more detailed investigations into mechanisms of change.
Chapter
Many LGBTQ+ (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, Two-Spirit) youth want to participate in mental health services but cannot access care due to a lack of affirmative mental health providers and other barriers (e.g., transportation, geographic distance, lack of affirming parent to consent). More affirmative mental health providers are needed, including those who can provide services via telehealth. In the LGBTQ+ community, telehealth has been described as an important technological advancement with the potential to reduce barriers and improve access to culturally sensitive care. Limited research has studied the effectiveness of telehealth interventions with LGBTQ+ youth; however, LGBTQ+ youth appear poised and ready to benefit from virtual programming, such as telehealth services. This chapter will highlight the experiences, perceptions, and needs of LGBTQ+ youth, including their experiences of minority stress and their engagement in the online world. Additionally, we will review the emerging research regarding affirmative care practices in virtual space that may benefit the mental health and well-being of LGBTQ+ youth.
Article
Objective: Transgender youths are more likely than cisgender youths to need mental health care because of their high exposure to discrimination and victimization, including within health care systems. Accordingly, transgender youths have low care satisfaction and high rates of treatment dropout, further exacerbating existing mental health inequities. To reduce these inequities, mental health providers need knowledge and skills to enhance transgender youths' treatment engagement and benefits. However, a comprehensive set of practices addressing the needs of transgender youth patients and their providers does not exist. The authors developed gender-affirming psychotherapy (GAP), an evidence-informed set of skills and principles to augment mental health treatments for transgender youths. Methods: GAP was developed by using a human-centered design, a methodological approach for creating interventions that prioritize the needs of key stakeholders, which in this study included mental health providers and transgender youths and their parents (N=36). A scoping review of the literature and stakeholder focus groups were conducted to create GAP, which encompasses core principles and skills to enhance mental health services for transgender youths. Results: GAP encompasses 27 principles and 38 skills, organized within 10 domains. All principles and skills were designed to be relevant for various provider types (e.g., psychiatrists and social workers) and to be flexibly adapted to meet diverse patient needs. Conclusions: GAP offers a scalable and flexible approach to addressing the growing mental health care needs of transgender youths. The findings of this study suggest that a human-centered design is a feasible and efficient method for developing interventions to address health inequities.
Article
Full-text available
The primary aim of the present study is to extend discussions of navigating an emerging transgender or gender nonconforming (TGNC) identity during youth and young adulthood in a society in which TGNC identities remain invisible and marginalized. Participants include 13 racially/ethnically diverse TGNC young adults ages 18–29 in the United States. Constructivist grounded theory methods were used to collect, analyze, and interpret data. Navigating a TGNC Identity in the Dark emerged as a journey from initial recognition of an existing, but unidentifiable, difference toward awareness and acceptance of a TGNC identity. Analyses revealed six themes associated with navigating identity: Moving from Uncertainty to Knowing, Recognizing Self in Others, Finding Me, Explaining Work, Struggling for Authenticity, and Evolving Self-Acceptance. Narratives highlighted the complex journeys toward authenticity that included pervasive oppression. Findings from my study can be used to inform clinical work aimed at supporting TGNC individuals as they recognize and make meaning of their TGNC identities. Moreover, findings underscore the importance of increasing the level of visibility and affirmation of a range of TGNC identities and experiences in dominant institutions (e.g., media, schools, health care) in the lives of youth as a way to facilitate self-understanding and acceptance at earlier ages and with fewer obstacles.
Article
Full-text available
Research in various populations has shown that, starting early in childhood, individuals often demonstrate resilience in the face of stress and adversity. Against the experience of minority stress, LGBT people mount coping responses and most survive and even thrive despite stress. But research on resilience in LGBT populations has lagged. In this commentary, I address 2 broad issues that I have found wanting of special exploration in LGBT research on resilience: First, I note that resilience, like coping, is inherently related to minority stress in that it is an element of the stress model. Understanding resilience as a partner in the stress to illness causal chain is essential for LGBT health research. Second, I explore individual- versus community-based resilience in the context of minority stress. Although individual and community resilience should be seen as part of a continuum of resilience, it is important to recognize the significance of community resilience in the context of minority stress.
Article
Full-text available
With a national sample of 552 transgender adults, the present study tested hypotheses drawn from minority stress theory and positive psychology research on stress-ameliorating processes. Specifically, the present study examined the relations of minority stressors (i.e., antitransgender discrimination, stigma awareness, and internalized transphobia) and individual- and group-level buffers (i.e., resilience and collective action) of minority stress. As expected, each minority stressor was positively correlated with psychological distress. In terms of buffers, resilience—though not collective action—was negatively correlated with psychological distress. Additionally, stigma awareness—but not internalized transphobia—mediated the relation of antitransgender discrimination with higher psychological distress. Moderation analyses indicated that resilience did not moderate any of the relations of the minority stressors with psychological distress. However, contrary to prediction, collective action strengthened the positive relation of internalized transphobia with psychological distress. Furthermore, at high levels of collective action, internalized transphobia became a significant mediator of the discrimination-distress relation. Strategies for developing individual (e.g., resilience building strategies) and group-level (e.g., engagement in collective action) interventions targeted toward transgender individuals who experience discrimination are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) youth have the potential for considerable resilience. Positive media representations may mediate negative experiences and foster self-esteem, yet the relationship between resilience and both traditional offline and new online media remains underaddressed for this population. This grounded-theory exploration of media-based resilience-building activities by LGBTQ youth (n = 19) indicated four themes that media use enabled: coping through escapism; feeling stronger; fighting back; and finding and fostering community. Data are embedded to evidence thematic findings and incorporate participant voices. The importance of considering the media within contemporary LGBTQ youth's ecological framework to capture their resilience is considered.
Article
Full-text available
When empirically supported treatments (ESTs) are effectively adapted for use with minority populations, they may be more efficacious. As such, there is a need to adapt existing ESTs for use with diverse sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY). The unique bias-based challenges faced by SGMY require the integration of affirmative practices into ESTs to effectively address the specific needs of this underserved group of youth. The primary purpose of the authors in this article is to present a clearly articulated stakeholder driven model for developing an affirmative adapted version of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for use with diverse SGMY. The authors' approach to adaptation follows the "adapt and evaluate" framework for enhancing cultural congruence of interventions for minority groups. A community based participatory research approach, consistent with a stakeholder driven process, is utilized to develop the intervention from the ground up through the voices of the target community. Researchers conducted 3 focus groups with culturally diverse SGMY to explore salient aspects of youths' cultural and SGM identities in order to inform the intervention and ensure its applicability to a wide range of SGMY. Focus group data is analyzed and integrated into an existing group-based CBT intervention. The following themes emerge as critical to affirmative work with diverse SGMY: (1) the interplay between cultural norms, gender norms, sexual orientation, and gender identity; (2) the complex role of religious community within the lives of SGMY; and (3) consideration of extended family and cultural community as youth navigate their SGM identities.
Article
Full-text available
Historically, many gender variant individuals have lived in a chronic state of conflict between self-understanding and physical being, one in which there was a continual misalignment between others' perceptions of them and their internal self-perception of gender. Only recently have professionals from mental health and medical realms come together to provide services to these youth. This paper describes an innovative program: the first mental health and medical multidisciplinary clinic housed in a pediatric academic center in North America to serve the needs of gender variant youth. We describe our model of care, focusing on the psychologist's role within a multidisciplinary team and the mental health needs of the youth and families assisted. We highlight clinical challenges and provide practice clinical vignettes to illuminate the psychologist's critical role.
Article
This pilot study sought to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a brief, eight module affirmative cognitive behavioral coping skills group intervention (AFFIRM) with sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) developed through community partnerships. A diverse sample of SGMY (n = 30) participated in the AFFIRM pilot and completed reliable measures of depression, reflective coping, and stress appraisal at three time points. Over the study duration, significant reductions were found in depression and appraising stress as a threat. Significant increases were found in reflective coping and perceiving stress as a challenge. Participants found the intervention to be valuable and reported high levels of acceptability and skills acquisition. These promising findings suggest that AFFIRM has potential effectiveness as a community-based intervention for SGMY. Implications for practice and research are provided.
Article
This study assessed individual (ie, internalized transphobia) and structural forms of stigma as risk factors for suicide attempts among transgender adults. Internalized transphobia was assessed through a 26-item scale including four dimensions: pride, passing, alienation, and shame. State-level structural stigma was operationalized as a composite index, including density of same-sex couples; proportion of Gay-Straight Alliances per public high school; 5 policies related to sexual orientation discrimination; and aggregated public opinion toward homosexuality. Multivariable logistic generalized estimating equation models assessed associations of interest among an online sample of transgender adults (N = 1,229) representing 48 states and the District of Columbia. Lower levels of structural stigma were associated with fewer lifetime suicide attempts (AOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.997), and a higher score on the internalized transphobia scale was associated with greater lifetime suicide attempts (AOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.33). Addressing stigma at multiple levels is necessary to reduce the vulnerability of suicide attempts among transgender adults.