Content uploaded by Jonathan Passmore
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Jonathan Passmore on Nov 29, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
EXECUTIVE REPORT 2017
The State of Play in European
Coaching & Mentoring
Jonathan Passmore, Hazel Brown, Zoltan Csigas et al
European Coaching and Mentoring Research Consortium
2
• Maral Amanyazova
• Ines Basta
• Bramson Bean
• Hans Bodingbauer
•
• Chiara Borg
•
• Hazel Brown
• Billy Byrne
• Ayse Cinar
• Zoltan Csigas
•
•
•
•
•
• Ian Edwards
•
• Jenny Georgieva
•
•
•
•
•
•
• Pavlina Honsova
• Therese Høyer
•
•
• Eva Jarosova
• Tanja Ryberg Jensen
•
• Ingibjorg Kaldalóns
• Christine Kranz
•
•
•
•
•
• Irina Maltseva
•
•
• Paul O Olson
• Katrina Osleja
• Xavier Panades
• Jonathan Passmore
•
Pedersen
•
• Ana Penim
• Kevin René
• Wendy Robinson
• Tatiana Rowson
•
• Arjeta Spahiu
•
•
•
•
• Toomas Tamsar
•
•
• Tonia Tsirogianni
• Cristian Tudoran
•
• Judit van Bartheld
• Tony Wall
• Alexander Waring
•
Consortium researchers and authors
Contents
Lead research partners ............................................ 4
Introduction .............................................................5
Biographical information ..........................................6
Mentoring .................................................................8
Management of mentoring schemes .......................10
Coaching practice ................................................... 12
Reective practice and supervision ........................15
Continuous professional development ................... 17
Conceptual models and approaches ........................19
Diversity of approaches ..........................................20
Evaluation ..............................................................23
Contracting for corporate coaching assignments .... 24
Ethics ...................................................................... 27
Commissioning coaching ........................................31
Research partners ................................................... 33
4
henley.ac.uk/coachingcentre
The Henley Centre for Coaching
The EMCC exists to
develop, promote and set
Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Serbia,
emccouncil.org/eu/en/accreditation
Researchers
Dr Jonathan Passmore
Dr Hazel Brown
This report provides an overview of the
main ndings from the 2017 European
Coaching and Mentoring Research Project,
undertaken by Jonathan Passmore and
Hazel Brown, in partnership with the EMCC
and the wider European coaching and
mentoring industry. The study was planned
in 2016 and undertaken during a 12-week
period, between March and May 2017.
Research methodology
Diagram 1: Gender (all participants)
Diagram 2: Age (all participants)
Male
1142
1798
Age 18-29
140 84
Diagram 3: Membership of professional coaching association (coaches only)
Diagram 4: Years of coaching experience (coaches only)
B
91
400
410
747
0 200 400 800 1000 1200
0 100 200 400 700 800
More than 20 years
8-12 years
4-7 years
240
729
7
Mentoring
What is mentoring ?
mentoring relationships that support individuals at
‘A long term relationship that meets a
development need, oered by a senior
or more experienced individual to a junior
or less experienced individual where the
less experienced individual receives
guidance, advice and support to help
their development’.
Evidence of the contribution of
mentoring to the workplace
1
groups, helping them to address disadvantage and
2
Responses
The responses from this section were generated
from 245 mentors, although not all participants
(mentors) answered all questions. The results
indicates that mentoring is most frequently used
for supporting leadership development and that
the average mentor is contributing 3-7 hours per
month to mentoring, although many are
contributing more hours per month.
he Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of
Coaching & Mentoring
2The Wiley Blackwell
Handbook of the Psychology of Coaching & Mentoring
Academy of Management Journal,
8
Diagram 5: Types of Mentoring (mentors only)
the programme
New employees to
the organisation
Employees on leadership
development programmes
90
128
81
0 20 40 80 100 120 140
9
Diagram 6: Mentoring time (mentors only)
> 24 hours per month
24
0 10 20 40 70 80 90
Diagram 7: Evaluating mentoring (mentors only)
The organisation
the assignment
19
14
0 20 40 80 100 120
Scheme design and management
Europe, the USA and beyond has allowed examples
4
Responses
The respondents to this section were in-company
mentoring scheme managers. In total 93
respondents completed questions in this section,
of which 89 were in Europe and from 26 dierent
countries. The results conrm most organisations
(53%) run both formal and informal mentoring, with
mentoring making a large contribution to higher
sta morale (57%) and improved communication
in the organisation (62%).
Diagram 8: Types of mentoring
4The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the
Psychology of Coaching & Mentoring
10
Diagram 9: Who receives mentoring
Others
the programme
New employees to
the organisation
Employees on leadership
development programmes
18
28
010 20 40
Exposure and visibility to
Improved managerial and
the organisation
Superior business learning
and motivation
14 7
1 2
9
14 24 488
1
724 10
27 8
942 40
2
11
4 7
2
729 7
49 48
12
2
10
2
812 10
Diagram 10: Benets of mentoring
11
0 100 200 400
70
202
188
417
249
21
Diagram 11: Coaching time
What is coaching?
‘A Socratic-based future-focused dialogue
between a facilitator (coach) and a participant
(coachee/client), where the facilitator
uses open questions, active listening,
summaries and reections which are aimed at
stimulating the self-awareness and personal
responsibility of the participant’.5
respondents did, spending on average around a
Responses
The respondents in this section were coaches.
They were engaged in a diverse set of activities,
typically spending 10-30% of their time on
coaching and most commonly supporting clients
to improve their performance at work (Diagram 13).
In terms of fee rates, the results indicated these
varied widely between respondents and varied
between individual and corporate coaching
assignments (Diagrams 14-15).
An International
Journal of Theory, Practice & Research
12
Diagram 12: Supervisor time
Diagram 13: Focus of coaching work
mental health issues
1149
0 1000 2000
1
2
1
2
4
11
0 100 200 400 700
Diagram 14: Fee rates, Corporate funded coaching (per hour)
Over €1000
€800 - 1000
8
17
29
€101 - 199
127
299
0 100 200 400
Diagram 15: Fee rates, Individual funded coaching (per hour)
Over €1000
€800 - 1000
€101 - 199
2
11
497
0 1000 2000
14
and supervision
What is reective practice?
What is supervision?
The process that occurs when a mentor or
coach brings their work to a supervisor in
order to be supported, reective and engage
in collaborative learning for their personal
development for the benet of themself,
their clients and their organisational clients.
Responses
Respondents in this section were coaches.
The coaches most commonly used self-reection
(Diagram 16), typically spending 60-90 minutes per
week on this activity (Diagram 17). In terms of more
formal reection, such as supervision, rates were
lower than rates for coaching clients (Diagram 18)
Diagram 16: Methods of Self Reection
None
Co-Mentor
789
Mentor
0 1000 2000
More than 240 minutes
120-140 minutes
90-120 minutes
178
979
0 200 400 800 1000 1200
No supervision
Diagram 17: Personal reection time (per week)
Diagram 18: Fees paid for reective practice (per hour)
0
2
0 100 200 400 700 800
Over €1000
€800 - 1000
€101 - 199
Diagram 19: Frequency of supervision
(based on ratio of 1 hour of supervision: per X hours of coaching)
development
What is continuous professional
development?
A learning process employed by professionals to
ensure that their standards and competencies
are maintained and enhanced over time.
The development of CPD
Responses
The coaches in this section responded to
questions about CPD. They felt that CPD for
coaches should typically involve 16-30 hours per
annum (Diagram 20), with reading forming the
most popular activity, including books and research
articles, followed by attending conferences and
networking (Diagram 21).
Diagram 20: Investment of time in CPD (per annum)
Supervision, Ethics and Continuous Professional Development 17
Diagram 21: Keeping up to date
18
University program
0 1000 2000
228
1211
7
Diagram 22: Coaching practice vs Coaching training
Other
Existential
Transpersonal
Motivational
interviewing
Gestalt
analysis
Cognitive
behavioural
Behavioural
210
212
280
890
1299
1190
1888
0 1000 2000
19
7 Essential Research Findings in Counselling and Psychotherapy
8 Other writers have argued that this
9
Responses
In this section we asked coaches to imagine they
were faced with clients with dierent presenting
issues and asked them what method or approach
they would select. Behavioural or cognitive
behavioural coaching were the preferred methods
for the majority of the presenting issues we invited
coaches to consider.
8Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice
and Research
9Project Match Monograph Series - Volume 2
Essential Research Findings in Counselling and Psychotherapy
Diagram 23: Presenting issue 1 - Career change
Diagram 24: Presenting issue 2 - Workplace stress
Cognitive behavioural
Gestalt
Motivational interviewing
Transpersonal
Existential
Cognitive behavioural
Gestalt
Motivational interviewing
Transpersonal
Existential
20
Diagram 25: Presenting issue 3 - Improving presentation skills
Diagram 26: Presenting issue 4 - Habitual checking of email / social media
Cognitive behavioural
Gestalt
Motivational interviewing
Transpersonal
Existential
Cognitive behavioural
Gestalt
Motivational interviewing
Transpersonal
Existential
21
Diagram 27: Presenting issue 5 - Anxiety of travelling on public transport
Cognitive behavioural
Gestalt
Motivational interviewing
Transpersonal
Existential
22
Evaluation
10 Organisations
are interested in evaluation to help them understand
are interested in evaluation to help them understand
Does coaching work?
11
Responses
The coaches who responded to this section revealed
most were evaluating either informally at the end of
a meeting or formally at the end of an assignment.
10
11
Journal of Positive Psychology
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Diagram 28: Evaluating impact
Diagram 29: Sources of feedback
every meeting with
random sample
and the line manager
manager
and line manager
In writing in a multi-part
In writing separately with all parties
In writing with the organisation and
verbally with the other parties
HR department
Verbally in a multi-partite
agreement
Verbally with all three separately
HR department
Verbally with the sponsor
line manager
Verbally with the individual
444
107
94
Coaching contracting
-
-
Multi-party coaching agreement
not always, tri-partite agreements, jointly signed
Diagram 30: Agreeing the contract
0 100 200 400 700
24
Diagram 31: The primary client
Organisational HR department
Whoever is paying
Diagram 32: Contract clauses – Individual client agreements
Diagram 33: Contract clauses – Organisational client agreements
0 10 20 40 70 80 90 100
0 10 20 40 70 80 90 100
What are ethics?
Why is ethics important in coaching?
12 However, the diversity
Responses
The coaches who responded to this section typically
share their ethical code (56%) and they typically
tell the client about it at the start of the coaching
conversation (32%).
Diagram 34: Sharing ethical codes - 1
No - never
Diagram 35: Sharing ethical codes - 2
12The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Coaching
& Mentoring
Other
0 200 400 800 1000 120
27
Diagram 36: Ethical Dilemma 1 - Coach pays a fee to secure the contract
register permanently
Nothing
Diagram 37: Ethical Dilemma 2 - Coach enters a sexual relationship with client
register permanently
Nothing
28
Diagram 38: Ethical Dilemma 3 - Coach enters a sexual relationship after
coaching relationship has ended
register permanently
Nothing
Diagram 39: Ethical Dilemma 4 - Coach fails to report ‘low-level’ drug taking by client
register permanently
Nothing
29
Diagram 40: Ethical Dilemma 5 - Coach fails to report theft of commercially sensitive information
register permanently
Nothing
Coach commissioners
Who are commissioners?
Responses
In total 131 coach commissioners responded to
this section of which 4 were outside Europe. Not
all respondents answered all questions. The
responses showed that the two most important
factors for commissioners when appointing
coaches were coach experience (50%) and
professional qualications (23%). In terms of who
was the ‘primary client’ they were divided, with
40% seeing the organisation and 40% stating that
the individual and the organisation were of
equal importance.
Diagram 41: Criteria used in coach selection
Diagram 42: Who do you believe is the primary client when you are
delivering Corporate / Organisational coaching?
Diagram 43: What aspects are explicitly included in your contract with the organisation?
What would not be
88
108
91
0 20 40 80 100 120 140
International research partners
•
•
•
•
National research partners
•
•
•
•
•
•
• EMCC UK
•
• EMCC Poland
•
•
•
•
• Collegium Civitas University
• WSB Universities
•
•
• Norman Bennett Group
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• HR Centar
•
•
•
•
•
• Johdon työnohjaajat Ry
• Henry Ry
•
•
•
•
• EMCC Hungary
•
• ENI Corporate University
• SCP Italy
•
•
• Edinburgh Napier University
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• EMCC Switzerland
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
International research partners
•
•
•
•
•
• Zoltan Csigas
• Eve Menezes Cunningham
•
•
•
•
• Gilles Gambade
• Adam Gieniusz
•
•
•
• Wendy Johnson
• Kiril Kalev
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• Jeannette Marshall
•
•
•
•
•
•
• Marita Salo
• Gill Smith
•
• Anna Srebrna
•
• Reinhard Stelter
•
• Adina Tarry
•
• Katharine Tulpa
• Christian van Nieuwerburgh
•
•
•
• William Wong
Henley Centre for Coaching
at Henley Business School
For more information, please contact:
Greenlands,
Henley-on-Thames,
United Kingdom
T: E:
henley.ac.uk/coachingcentre
EFMD