Content uploaded by Behrooz Asgari
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Behrooz Asgari on Jun 12, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
ORIGINAL RESEARCHORIGINAL RESEARCH
ORIGINAL RESEARCH:
::
:
Asystemdynamicsapproachtosupplychainperformance
analysisoftheready-made-garmentindustryinBangladesh
BehroozAsgari
1,2
andMdAynulHoque
1
Abstract
Theready-madegarment(RMG)
industryhas recentlyoccupiedthelargestpartofexportsandforeign
currency in Bangladesh and has been for more than a decade the second largest contributor to gross
domestic product (GDP).Millions of poor women and men are employed in this industry. However, a
supportingimportquotasystemintheUSAwasstoppedin2005whichhaslefttheRMGsectorstruggling
against new challenges thatneed to be properly addressed. As the end consumersof the apparel fashion
marketarebecomingincreasinglytime-sensitive,adecreaseinleadtime,besidesqualityandcostcriteria,is
neededtowinmoreordersfrombuyers.Wehaveexaminedtheopportunitythatliesinanintegratedsupply
chaintoprovideacompetitiveadvantagetotheBangladeshRMGsector.Asystemdynamicsapproachhas
beenusedtoidentifythedominantvariablesofsupplychainperformance(suchasenablers,performanceor
results,andinhibitors)intheRMGsector.Asurveyandindividualinterviewswereconductedwithsenior
managementpersonnel,supplychainprofessionals,andmerchandisersoftheRMGindustry.Basedon the
findings, a causal loop diagram is proposed to help understand the dynamic behavior among the said
variables so that the top management may take effective decisions in order to enhance the supply chain
performanceinthelongrun.
Keywords: Bangladesh,
Causal loop diagram, Integrated supply chain, Lead time, Ready-made
garmentindustry,Systemdynamicsanalysis
Introduction
Theexportofready-madegarments(RMG)fromBangladeshhasbeenincreasingsorapidlyforthelasttwo
decadesthatithascometooccupythelion’sshareofitstotalexports.BangladeshstartedexportingRMGat
an annual value of about US$32 million in 1983-84 but experienced a continuous massive growth which
resulted in an almost US$18,000 million of export value of RMG in 2011-12 (Export Promotion Bureau,
Bangladesh,2012).Onceheavilydependentonexportingjuteproducts,theeconomyofBangladeshisnow
experiencingmorethanthreefourthsofitsexportcontributionsfromtheRMGsectoralone.InBangladesh,
theexportvalueof RMGoutoftotalexportswasalmost76%in2008and79%in2012(ExportPromotion
Bureau,Bangladesh,2012).Thisnewlybornindustryhasbecomeimmenselysignificantintheeconomyof
Bangladeshduetoits high contributions to the totalexportvalue,GrossDomesticProduct(GDP)andjob
creation,especiallyforwomen,aswellashelpingthebackward-forwardsupplychainindustriestogrow.
Among developing economies such as Cambodia, Sri-Lanka, China, etc, Bangladesh has achieved a
strongpositionasoneoftheglobalsuppliersofRMG,mainlyduetohavingoneofthecheapestlaborcosts
among the apparel manufacturing countries. The globalization of industries created pressure for location-
based manufacturing economies which were also supported by the US and European Union(EU) import
policies.The‘multi-fiberarrangement’(MFA),aquotasystemimposedbytheUSfederalgovernmentforced
USimporterstosourcefromlessdevelopedcountries with the aim of fosteringtheir manufacturingability
andsupportingthegrowthoftheapparelindustryincountriesfromSouthAsia,Chinaandotherdeveloping
nations. After the MFA system became defunct in 2005, Bangladesh started to countermore rivalry, both
1
GraduateSchoolofManagement,RitsumeikanAsianPacificUniversity(APU),BeppuCity,Oita,Japan
2
Correspondingauthor,e-mail:behrooz@apu.ac.jp
52
RitsumeikanJournalofAsiaPacificStudiesVolume32,2013
anticipatedandunanticipated,frommanyproducersandsuppliersbecauseitturnedintoanopenmarketfor
all. Now, the RMG industry of Bangladesh is struggling with many global competitors in terms of cost,
quality,customerservice,andleadtime.
In recent years many reputable organizations are purchasing products, and sourcing, distributing and
selling simultaneously from different corners of the world. This globalization of operations has become
inevitablebecausecheaplaborisavailableinsomecountrieswhilerawmaterialisreadilyavailableinothers.
Moreover,thetime,costandqualitysensitivenessarealsosignificantlyvariedamongcustomersindifferent
regionsoftheworld.Throughanefficientimplementationofintegratedsupplychainmanagement,theRMG
industry in Bangladeshcould stay competitive by maintaining the required efficiencyand responsiveness.
Thiswasthetraditionalview of all companiesthattheyexistedassingle and complete units and operated
theirbusinessesseparately.
However, the business environment has changed in the 21
st
century such that working alone is less
competitive while collaborative working among upward and downward supply chain partners is more
profitable. Through managing the supply chain, the ultimate objective of companies is offering maximum
valuetocustomersforthedeliveredproductsorservicesbyachievingeitherresponsivenessorefficiency.To
adddynamiccapabilitytotheRMGsectorandenhancesupplychainperformance,manufacturersshouldplan
andworkcollaborativelywiththeupwardsuppliersoffabricandaccessoriesaswellasthedownwardbuyers
andpartnersofthesupplychain.
ScottandWestbrook(1991)andNewandPayne(1995)describethesupplychainas“thechainlinking
eachelementof the manufacturingandsupplyprocessesfromrawmaterialstotheend user, encompassing
several organizational boundaries”. According to this broad definition, supply chain management (SCM)
“encompassestheentirevaluechainandaddressesmaterialsandsupplymanagementfromtheextractionof
rawmaterialstoitsendofusefullife”.Farleyexplains(1997)thatSCM“focusesonhowfirmsutilizetheir
suppliers’'processes,technology,andcapabilitytoenhancecompetitiveadvantage”.
Houlihan (1987, 1988)defined SCM as the technique ofcombining various key departmentss uchas
production, finance, marketing and human resourceof a c ompany so that this unified chain links tier-one
suppliersanddistributorstoenhanceperformancebyreachingthefinalcustomersontime.Thereisalready
some scholarly work thatshows focal companies can utilize vendors’ manufacturing expertise and other
R&Dassetstodesignnewproductsatlowercoststhroughcollaborationamongtradingpartners.
SCMintheRMGSector:
Someofthekeycharacteristicsofthefashionindustryarethatthelifecycleofanynewstylesofapparelsis
continuously decreasing, end demand for any garments is highly fluctuating and changing over time,
various kinds of designsand styles are evolving everyday worldwide, and the total chain from yarn and
cotton supplies to final garments through a lot of suppliers from many countries is very dynamic and
difficulttomanage(Sen, 2008). So, apparel manufacturingcompanies of anycountryshouldmanagethe
supplychaininawaythatmeetsthetotalneedsoftheendconsumers(Gunasekaranetal.,2008).Thishas
caused the fashion industry to become increasingly complex and dynamic, and this sector has attracted
manynewmarketentrantsandthushastriggeredintensecompetitions(Gunasekaranetal.,2008).
The business of the fashion industry is so volatile and competitive that the driver for successful
entrepreneurship is capitalizing on opportunities and scopes by integrated efforts among supply chain
partners(Sen,2008);apparelmanufacturersandtradersareengagingthemselvestoutilizeintegratedsupply
chainmanagementas a source for improvingtheirbusinessperformance(Gunasekaranetal.,2008).Lam
53
Asystemdynamicsapproachtosupplychainperformanceanalysisoftheready-made-garmentindustryinBangladesh
andPostle(2006)foundintheirstudythatsupplychainmanagementconsciousnesswasstillcomparatively
lowamongtheapparelmanufacturersandtradersinHongKong.LeeandKincade(2003)mentionedsome
of the key dimensions they found in the US apparel supply chain including “partnership, information
technology,operationalflexibility,performancemeasurement,commitmentoftopmanagementanddemand
characterization”.
ThecurrentRMGmanufacturersofBangladeshareimportingmostoftherequiredwovenfabricsfrom
China,India,PakistanandIndonesia.Asaresult,thetotalleadtimeisbecominglonger,puttinganegative
edgeoncompetitiveness.Itispossibletoreducethetotalleadtimethroughsupplychainintegrationamong
upstream and downstream partners to make RMG manufacturers more competitive (Nuruzzaman and
Haque,2009).Supplychainintegrationmakesitpossibletomanufacturefabricsbeforetakingordersfrom
buyers but requires more collaboration among buyers, fabric suppliers and garment manufacturers in
Bangladesh.
Nuruzzamanet al.(2010)realizedthatalongleadtimewas oneofthegreatestproblemsoftheRMG
sectorinBangladeshandthatitstopfivecausesconstitutedtheissuesofintegratedsupplychainmanagement
(SCM). They emphasizet hatSCM is basically a complex process for countries,a nd a newin the apparel
sectorespeciallyintheleastdevelopedcountrieslikeBangladesh.Nuruzzamanetal.,(2010)concludedthat
acountrylikeBangladeshmaycreatearemarkablepositionintheworld’stotalapparelexportbymanaging
thepartnersofsupplychaintoreducetheleadtime.
However,there are onlyafewin-depthstudiesaboutSCMfortheRMGsectorin Bangladeshandno
study offers indicationson how factories can increase productivity, reduce costs,and respond to changing
customerneedsusingeffectiveandefficientintegrationamongsupplychainpartners.Theprimarypurposeof
the study is to identify the interdependence and dynamic behavior that exists among supply chain
performancevariables.
Methodology
A questionnaire was designed as a survey instrument. The questionnaire includedboth closed ended and
open ended questions. We asked respondents to indicate the importance of supply chain performance
variablesusingafive-pointLikertscale.Wealsocarriedoutseparatedepth-interviewswithonemanaging
director and owner, one general manager, one merchandising manager and one factory manager from
differentgarmentfactoriestoconstructthecausalloopdiagramamongsupplychainperformancevariables.
ModelingusingSystemDynamics:
SystemDynamicshasevolvedmainlyfromindustrialdynamicswhichwasfirstwrittenbyJayW.Forrester
in1961.Forrester(IndustrialDynamics,1961:13)explainedindustrialdynamicsasacomplexsystemof
inter-dependentindustrial organizations;thisinterdependencechangesover timeasinformationfeed-back
changes and that’s why it is called a dynamic system. Sterman (2000) used industrial dynamics for
analyzingbusinesssystemsdependinguponchanginginformationandtime.Thussystemdynamicsisvery
usefultocraftfuturepoliciesforrunningbusinessesinacomplexenvironmentastimechanges.Inaddition
totangiblefactors,itcanalsobeusedtomodelintangiblefactorswhicharenoteasilymeasureablesuchas
humanbehavior,customersatisfaction,andemployeeskills.Simulationofintangiblefactorsissometimes
calledstrategicsimulationbecauseitdoesn’tactuallyquantifytheexactnumericalvaluebutshowsapattern
54
RitsumeikanJournalofAsiaPacificStudiesVolume32,2013
of the likely outcome for intangible factors when they are acting in various feedback loops with inter-
relations,changeovertime,ordemonstrateadynamicbehavior.
There are two structural ways to analyze any dynamic systems: ‘causal loop diagram’ (CLD) and
‘stockandflowdiagram’.CLDdiagramscanbeusedtoshowthegoverninginter-relationsamonganumber
ofdifferentvariablesusingfeedbackloops.Apositivefeedbackloopmeansthedependentvariablemoves
inthesamedirectionas that oftheindependentvariable;as such,the polaritiesareassignedasaplus(+)
signonthearrowheadoffeedbackloops.Inthecaseofnegativefeedbackloops,iftheindependentvariable
increases, the dependent variable decreases and vice versa. Thus a minus (–) sign is assigned to the
arrowheadofthefeedbackloop.
The other structure of system dynamics is a stock and flow diagram which is used to explainboth
variables,i.e.thestocksandflows. Stocksrefertothe statusofvariablesat apoint/momentof timewhile
flowsexistduringaperiodoftime.Stocksareaccumulatedovertimethroughinflowsandoutflows.Apart
fromstockandflow variables,another kind of variable called an ‘auxiliaryvariable’ has beenusedhere.
Auxiliaryvariablesareusedtoconnectbetweenstocksandflowsaswellasamongthemselves.Byusingall
thesethree kindsofvariables,wecanexplaindynamicsystemsmoreappropriately.Manyresearchersand
authors have used stock and flow diagrams to model and describe supply chain performance variables
(AgarwalandShankar2005,CampuzanoandMula2011).
Table1:Definitionsofvariables
Variables Remarksandmeaning Types References
Supplychain
performance/
orders/sales
Includesallvariableslistedbelow.Leadtimereduction,
costminimizationandqualityimprovementsare
achievedthroughallotheractivitiesaslistedbelow.
Supplychain
performance
index
Agarwal&Shankar
(2005)
Leadtime
reduction
Oneofthekeyorderwinningcriteriafrombuyers.
Leadtimeisthedurationoftimefromorderplacement
toordershipmentdate.Leadtimereductionsignifies
agilityoftheparticularcompany’ssupplychain.
Result Towill(1996)
Cost
minimization
Anotherkeyorderwinningcriteriaalongwithleadtime
reduction.Itcanbeachievedthroughlean
manufacturing,collaborativeplanning,andintegrated
supplychain
Result Mason-Jones,Naylor&
Towill(2000)
Quality
improvement
Sophisticatedproductsatareasonablylowprice.It’s
veryimportantforEUbuyers.
Result Christopher&Towill
(2001)
Process
integration
Workingtogetherofsuppliers&buyers,ajointeffort
tosolveproblemsordevelopproductsorqualityor
system
Enabler Christopher(2000)
Collaborative
planning
Usepartnersfacilitiesandopportunitiestomaximize
efficiency,capturemarketpotential
Enabler Christopher&Towill
(2001)
Deliveryspeed Prepareforshort-termandlongtermchangesbasedon
markettrends/changesandbuyersexpectations
Enabler Christopher&Towill
(2001)
UseofIT Usingsoftwareandhardwaretoshareinformation
effectivelyandtoimprovequalityandproductionspeed
Enabler Yuetal,(2001),
Fasangharietal.(2008)
Uncertainty Effectofchangingmarketsituations,andsupplychain
unpredictability,bullwhipeffect
Inhibitor Agarwal&Shankar
(2005),Mason-Jones&
Towill(2000)
Market
sensitiveness
Achievequickresponsivenesstothechangingmarket
environmentintermsofdemandpatternandqualityso
thatsupplychainbecomesagile.
Enabler Christopher(2000)
55
Asystemdynamicsapproachtosupplychainperformanceanalysisoftheready-made-garmentindustryinBangladesh
VariablesofthesystemdynamicsmodelforRMGinBangladesh:
After the ‘multi fiber arrangement’ (MFA) phased out in 2005, the Bangladesh RMG industry had to
competewithallotherapparel manufacturersandsuppliersaroundtheworld.Asaresult,itwasforcedto
reducecostswhilemaintainingreasonablygoodquality.Accordingtoexpertsintheindustry,goodquality
meanssophisticatedproductsthataresomewhatdifficulttosewandconformtobuyers’requirements.They
alsocommentthatbuyersfromUSAfocusmoreonreducedcostswhilebuyersfromEuropeemphasizeon
highqualityand fashionableproducts,butalsoreasonablecosts.Astheproductlifecyclesare decreasing
continuously,theleadtimeisalsodecreasingandputtingextrapressuretotheBangladeshRMGindustry.
So,RMGmanufacturershavetosupplyhighqualityproductsat areasonablylowercostandshorterlead
timesthanbeforetoattractcustomersfromUSAandEurope.Somekeyvariableshavebeenidentifiedfrom
the literature review andopinion of experts in the RMG sector.T hese variables are classified as results,
enablersandinhibitors(Table1).
Componentsofeachvariable:
Anumberoffactorswereidentifiedtorepresenteachenabler,resultandinhibitorvariable,throughasearch
in the literature including published articles and supply chain management textbooks. After listing these
factors, questionnaires were distributed among respondents of the sampled factories to collect their
opinions.FactorsassociatedwitheachvariablehavebeenlistedintheTable2.
Table2:Factorsassociatedwiththevariablesunderstudy
Variable Components(associatedfactors)
Marketsensitivity Startingtimeofrawmaterialsourcingandprocurement.Trainingmanagers,technicians,
workerstomanufacturingabilityofsophisticatedandfashionablegarments.Procuring
sophisticatedmachinerytoincreasethesewingabilityofsophisticatedgarmentsandimprove
quality
Deliveryspeed Assigningimportance/priorityonspecialtaskstomeetfuturerequirementsofmarketdemand
suchastrainingofhumanresources,usageofIT,workingtogetherwithbuyers&suppliers,
exchangeofnecessaryinformationamongsupplychainpartners,enhancecollaborationwith
suppliersandbuyers,havingstableworkforce
Processintegration Strategicallyfixedandfewernumbersofsuppliersandbuyers.Jointworkteamwithbuyers
andsupplierstosolveproblems.Providingfeedbackinformationtobuyersandsuppliersto
keepthemupdated.
Collaborative
planning
Usingcentralizedcollaborationteamsamongfactoriesorproductionfacilities.Informing
suppliersandbuyersaboutchangesofproductdesign/specificationwellinadvancesothat
necessarypreparationcanbetakentoreducewaste.Maintainandshareup-to-dateproduction
andinventorystatuswithbuyersandsuppliers
UseofIT Usingbothhardwareandsoftwareatleastinthreeaspectssuchasinternaloperations,
purchasingandvendormanagement,andonbuyerrelationship.Differentkindsofhardware
andsoftwarecanbeusedformanagingalltheseaspectslikeERPsoftware,markerandpattern
makingsoftware,inventorymanagementsoftware,etc.
Uncertainty Howmanytimesdidthebuyerschangetheirorderquantitiesandproductspecifications?What
istherateofshipmentsof100%quantityoforiginalordersorwithoutshortagebythe
factories?Howmanytimesfactoriescouldnotshipoutwithintheoriginalleadtime?How
frequentlydidtheoverseasanddomesticsuppliersfailtodeliverfabricsandaccessorieswithin
leadtime,withoutquantityshortageandwithappropriatequality?
FindingsandDiscussion
Thereareseveralloops among supplychainperformancevariablesinthecasualloop diagram(Figure1),
whilethevariableshavebeengroupedinto threecategoriesofenablers,resultsandinhibitors.Thesupply
56
RitsumeikanJournalofAsiaPacificStudiesVolume32,2013
chainperformanceisthesumtotalofallthesethreekindsofvariables.Wehaveusedsalesastheproxyfor
supply chain performance under the assumption that if the total number of orders increases then it
proportionatelyincreasesthesalesvalueandsignifiesthelevelofsupplychainperformancevariablesatany
particulartime.So,thehigherthesalesvalueis,thehigherthetotalsupplychainperformanceindexis.
The Vensim software can show all the loops among the variables at different nodes. At the supply
chainperformancenode,therearefiveloopsamongthevariablesinvolvingdifferentnumbersofvariables.
Forexample,ifthetargetcostminimizationincreasesthenthedifferencebetweentargetcostminimization
andactualcostminimizationincreasesandthefeedbackloopbetweenthemispositive.Asthedifferencein
cost minimization increases, the company obtains fewer numbers of orders from the buyers. Thus the
feedback loop between target cost minimization, actual cost minimization andsupply chain performance
variablesbecomesnegative(thefirstloopatthenodeofsupplychainperformance).
Figure1.CausalloopdiagramamongvariablesintheRMGsupplychain(seetextforexplanation)
In the second loop, when companies plan to obtain more orders from buyers they increase market
sensitivenesswhichalsohelpstoincreasethedeliveryspeed.Whenthedeliveryspeedincreasesitreduces
the lead time of theorders for production and shipping.Reduced lead time has become the secondmost
importantfactorforUSAbuyersandthemostimportantorderwinningcriteriaforEuropeanordersaswell
asforanyfashionableitemsorordersirrespectiveofmarkets(USAorEuropeoranypartoftheworld).As
the product life cycle is decreasing continuously, the reduced lead time is playing an important role for
securingordersfrombuyers.Thusincreasedmarketsensitiveness,increasedspeedofdeliveryandreduced
lead time increase the sales or supply chain performance index and the feedback loops among these
variablesarepositive(Figure1).
marketsensitiveness
deliverysp eed
processintegration
actualleadti me
reduction
targetleadt ime
reduction
differencein lead
tim ereduction
actualcost
minim ization
targetcost
minimization
differencein cost
minim ization
collaborative
planning
useofIT
uncertainty
targetquality
improvement
achievedquality
improvement
differencein quality
qualityimprovement
Supplychain
performance/orders
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+-
-
57
Asystemdynamicsapproachtosupplychainperformanceanalysisoftheready-made-garmentindustryinBangladesh
If we move from the second loop to the third loop, an additional variable involved is actual cost
minimization.Fromthethirdloop,weseethatleadtimeisreducedthroughincreasedmarketsensitiveness
andspeedofdelivery.Whenleadtimedecreases,thethroughputinthesupplychainincreasesrapidly.All
theinventoriesincludingfinishedgarments,fabrics,accessoriesandotherrawmaterialsandanyunfinished
items (work-in-process) will stay in thestore for a shorter length of time than usual. Thust he inventory
turnoverratiowillincreaseandthefinancialratioswillbepositivelyaffected.Asaresult,costminimization
willbeachievedproportionally,minimizingthecostandhelpingsecuremoreordersfrombuyers.
Inthefourthloop,thevariablesinvolvedaresupplychainperformance/orders,marketsensitiveness,
delivery speed, process integration, uncertainty and actual lead time reduction. In this loop, market
sensitiveness and deliveryspeed tend to increase process integration. When process integration increases
amongthecompanies,thenuncertaintyofbuyersand suppliersintheentiresupplychaindecreases.Thus
thefeedbackloopbetweendeliveryspeedandprocessintegrationispositive,asistheonebetweenprocess
integrationand uncertainty.Whenuncertaintyisreducedandprocessintegrationisincreased,leadtime is
againreducedwhichinturnincreasessales or thesupplychainperformance(asdescribedintheprevious
paragraph).
Thefifthloopshowshowincreasedprocessintegrationandreduceduncertaintycanleadtoincreased
actualcostminimizationbyreducingleadtime.Thisloopencompassestwoextravariables,namelyprocess
integrationanduncertainty,andshowsacombinationofonetofourloops.
SomeempiricalevidencefromBangladeshRMG:
Itisverydifficultto exactlyquantifythe valueof marketsensitivenessandprocessintegrationsincethey
have various qualitative and quantitative dimensions. So, we have assumed the number of factories and
domestic supply of fabrics as proxiesfor market sensitiveness and processi ntegration and thesales as a
proxyforsupplychainperformance.Thenumberofgarmentfactoriesisassumedtorepresenttheproactive
marketsensitivenessinrespondingtoanincreaseddemandforBangladeshigarmentsintheglobalmarket.
We have assumed that the present factories (BGMEA, 2013) are fully capable of meeting their present
demands,andthenumbersof factories in previous yearshave been dividedbythenumberoffactoriesin
2010-2011(asbaseyear)togetthemarketsensitivenessforthecorrespondingyears.Thesalesofgarments
haveconstantlyincreasedasmarketsensitivenessincreased(Figure2).
Figure2.Therelationshipbetweenmarketsensitivenessandsupplychainperformance
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
199
…
199
…
199
…
199
…
199
…
199
…
199
…
200
…
200
…
200
…
200
…
200
…
200
…
200
…
200
…
200
…
200
…
201
…
marketsensitivenessinpercentage
performance inbillionUS$
58
RitsumeikanJournalofAsiaPacificStudiesVolume32,2013
Since fabrics is the single most important raw material to produce garments, the percentage of its
domesticsupplytototaldemand(BTMAandBangladeshMinistryofTextile,2013)indicatesthestrength
ofprocessintegrationinthebackwardsupplychainofgarmentindustry.Themorefabricssuppliedfromthe
domestic textile industry, the less Bangladesh garments are dependent on imported fabrics, thus an
indicationofimprovementinprocessintegration.Thedomesticsupplyoffabricscanreduceleadtimeand
costandimprovequalityby providing swift feedbacks and joint workwhichisless feasible with foreign
textiles. Figure 3 demonstrates that performance has increased greatly as the supply of fabrics from
domesticsourceshasincreased.
Figure3.Therelationshipbetweenprocessintegrationandsupplychainperformance
The results of our survey responses and depth interviews confirm that the lead time has become a
crucialfactortoincreasecompetitiveness.We have divided lead time intotwocomponentsof exportand
importleadtime(WorldDatabank,2013).Thesetwoleadtimesarelargelybeyondthecontrolofgarment
manufacturers,insteadthegovernmentandotherplayersinthebackwardandforwardsupplychainlinkages
arethemainactors;however,theyhavedecreasedovertimeasthegarmentsectorhasplayedakeyrolein
the national GDP andexports. Supply chain performancehas increased as these two variablesdecreased
overtime(Figure4).
Figure4.Therelationshipamongimportandexportleadtimesandsupplychainperformance
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
processintegrationinpercentage
performanceinbnUS$
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
importleadtimeindays
performance inbillionUS
$
importleadtimeindays
59
Asystemdynamicsapproachtosupplychainperformanceanalysisoftheready-made-garmentindustryinBangladesh
Limitationsofresearch:
Thereare some other enablervariablessuch as dataaccuracyand introductionof newproducts,and two
other inhibitors, namely, a lack of trust and resistance to change ( Agarwal et al., 2005) that can affect
supply chain performance. These variables arenot considered in our research. Customersatisfaction was
alsoexcludedfromourresearchthoughitcouldbeusedasaresultvariable.Thoughcustomersatisfactionis
themeasureofavailabilityofgarmentstothebuyers’locationwhentheyarerequired,measuringthisindex
seemstobeverydifficultinthecaseofBangladeshRMGindustry.Thuscustomersatisfactionhasnotbeen
consideredinourresearch.Nowadays,greensupplychainmanagementhasasignificantimpactonthesales
performance of garments in developed countries. But green supply chain has also not been taken into
considerationtodevelopthecausalloopdiagrambecauseitsexactimpactonsupplychainperformancewas
difficult to identify. We have considered the cost, quality and delivery (CQD) as the order qualifiers;
flexibilityhasnotbeen considered,though it can haveasignificantimpacton sales or theorderwinning
process.Theresultsofthesupplychainmodelsmightvarywhenmorevariablesareincluded.
Conclusion
Thecost,qualityandleadtimearethemostimportantresultvariablestosellgarmentstothebuyers.While
othercompetitorsfromdifferentcountriesareprovidinggarmentswiththesamequalityand atreasonably
low costs, reduced leadtime becomes the final criterion to secure sales.T hus, both the sales and supply
chainperformancecan beimprovedifapparelmanufacturingcompaniescanfurtherreducetheleadtime.
Whenleadtimeisreduced,ithasagreatimpactonotherkeyvariablessuchascostandquality.Ifleadtime
is reduced, then not only waste in different processes and departments along the garment supply chain
partners can be minimized but also cost may decreasebe cause the inventorycost and capital investment
decrease.Asaresult,acompanycangainmoreordersfromthebuyers.Theuseofinformationtechnology
(IT) among the supply chain partners and within the planning and operations of internal processes like
patternmaking,cutting,sewingand finishing, etc. mayhelp reduce the leadtime.Whenthe use ofITis
increased, collaborative planning and process integration also increase. As a result, it helps to reduce
uncertaintyalongthetotal chain andresultsin increasing supply chain performanceandmeetingbuyers’
orderquantitiesanddeliverydates.
The survey responses and depth interviews show that the competitiveness of Bangladesh garment
industryissuchan importantissue that most respondents in thesurveyrankeditone of top priorities for
securingneworders.Wealsodiscussedthismatterwiththeexpertsintheindustry.Allagreedthatleadtime
reductioncanhelpincreaseindustry’scompetitivenessandsalesaccordingly.To emphasize on the point,
we have included a separate section about lead time reduction strategy in the questionnaire to collect
suggestionsfromtherespondents.
Thismodelhelps to maximizethescopeof attaining optimum solutions inthesupply chain since it
showsthe interdependenceamongvariablesandthe dynamicbehaviorofthevariables.The CLDshowsa
complete or apt picture of how the whole supply chain variables are interlinked and how they can be
affectedbyothervariables.Adepartmentmayobtainitsoptimumobjectivesevenifsub-optimumsolutions
aretakenbyotherdepartmentsorforthewholesupplychain.
The system dynamics model can help achieve local optimum solutions for a global supply chain,
through better understanding and policy making. The system dynamics model helps policy makers to
60
RitsumeikanJournalofAsiaPacificStudiesVolume32,2013
understand how to integratesupply chain trading partners in backward and forwardlinkage to maximize
supply chain surplus. Finally it can help the top management to understand and analyze how the
performance variables areinter-related, where to de-couple some performances, and where to emphasize
andde-emphasizetoachievethewholesupplychainobjective.
Asforfutureresearch,itseemsthatcomplianceissueshave becomeanewlyemergingvitalfactorto
attract orders from developed countries after some deadly fires and accidents in Bangladesh garment
factories.So,itshouldbetakenintoconsiderationinthefuturegrowthoftheindustry.Afewmorevariables
such as the effect of research and development (R&D), domestic cotton production, and supply chain
complexitycanbeinvokedtomodeltheperformancemoreaccurately.Moreover,newcomponentscanbe
addedtotheproxyparametersformarketsensitivenessandprocessintegrationaswellasleadtime.
References
Agarwal, A. and Shankar, R. 2005. “Modeling supply chain performance variables”, Asian Academy of
ManagementJournal10(2):47-68.
BangladeshGarmentsManufacturersandExportersAssociation,http://bgmea.com.bd(accessed18January
2013)
BangladeshTextileMillsAssociation,http://www.btmadhaka.com(accessed18January2013)
Campuzano, F. and Mula, J. 2011. Supply chain simulation: A system dynamics approachfor improving
performance,Springer.
Christopher, M. 2000. “The agile supply chain, competing in volatile markets” Industrial Marketing
Management29(1):37-44.
Christopher, M. and Towill, D. 2001. “An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains”
InternationalJournalofPhysicalDistributionandLogistics31(4):235-246.
Coyle,R.G.1996.Systemdynamicsmodeling:Apracticalapproach,ChapmanandHall,London.
Fasanghari M, Roudsari, F. H. and Chaharsooghi, K. 2008. “Assessing the Impact of Information
TechnologyonSupplyChainManagement”WorldAppliedSciencesJournal4(1):87-93.
Gunasekaran, A., Lai,K. and Cheng, T.C.E. 2008. “Responsive supply chain: Aco mpetitive strategy in a
networkedeconomy”,Omega36(4):549-564.
Haque,K.M.A.,Hossain,M.M.,Shahriar,M.J.H.,Hassan,M.A.M.,Shamshuzzaman,M.andHossain,
M. D. 2011. “Performance Evaluation of Bangladeshi Apparel and Textile supply chain –A Case
Study”,WorldReviewofBusinessResearch1(1):211-218.
Houlihan, J. B. 1987. “International supply chain management”, International Journal of Physical
DistributionandMaterialsManagement17(2):51-66.
Houlihan, J. B. 1988. “International supply chains: a new approach. Management Decision”, Quarterly
ReviewofManagementTechnology26(3):13-19.
Lam, J. K. C. and Postle, R. 2008. “Textile and apparel supply chain management in Hong Kong”,
InternationalJournalofClothingScienceandTechnology18(4):265-277.
Lee,Y.andKincade,D. H. 2003. “USapparelmanufacturers’companycharacteristicdifferencesbasedon
SCMactivities”,JournalofFashionMarketingandManagement7(1):31-48.
Mason-Jones,R.andTowill,D.R.2000.“CopingwithUncertainty:ReducingBullwhip:BehaviorinGlobal
SupplyChains”SupplyChainForum:AnInternationalJournal1:40-45.
61
Asystemdynamicsapproachtosupplychainperformanceanalysisoftheready-made-garmentindustryinBangladesh
Mason-Jones,R.,Naylor,B.,andTowill,D.R.2000.“Engineeringthele-agilesupplychain”International
JournalofAgileManagementSystems2(1):54-61.
Meadows,D.H.2008.ThinkinginSystem:APrimer.Sustainabilityinstitute.
New, S. J. and Payne, P. 1995. “Research frameworks in logistics three models, seven dinners and a
survey”,InternationalJournalofPhysicalDistributionandLogisticsManagement25(10):60-77.
Nuruzzaman,M, Ahasanul,H. and Rafiq, A. 2010. “IsBangladeshiRMGSectorFitintheGlobalApparel
Business? Analyses the Supply Chain Management” The South East Asian Journal of Management,
April4(1):53-72.
Nuruzzaman, M. and Haque, A. 2009. “Lead time management in the garment sector of Bangladesh: an
avenueforsurvivalandgrowth”,EuropeanJournalofScientificResearch33(4):617-629.
Scott, C. and Westbrook, R. 1991. “New Strategic Tools for Supply Chain Management”, International
JournalofPhysicalDistributionandLogistics21(1):23-33.
Sen, A. 2008. “The US fashion industry: A supply chain review”, International Journal of Production
Economics114:571-593.
Sterman,J.D.2000.BusinessDynamics:SystemsThinkingandModelingforaComplexWorld,NewYork,
McGraw-Hill.
Towill, D. R. 1996. “Industrial dynamics modeling of supply chain” Logistics Information Management
9(4):43-56.
WorldDatabank,http://databank.worldbank.org(accessed18January,2013).
Yu, Z., Yan, H., and Edwin Cheng, T. C. 2001. “Benefits of information sharing with supply chain
partnerships”IndustrialManagementandDataSystems101(3):114-119.