Conference PaperPDF Available

It is Time to Think of S-convexity

Authors:
  • IICSE University

Abstract

Convexity has captured the hearts of pure and applied mathematicians because it is a very geometric concept. Professor Stanley F. Gudder, already in 1977, discussed using convexity in studies that connect to social, behavioural, and physical sciences. Professor Robert E. Jamison-Waldner talked about mathematical methods that are based on the convexity phenomenon in 1983. S-convexity was not a proper extension of convexity until 2001, when we started working with the concept. We have found many fallacies and inaccuracies that we have been addressing since then. The paper Minima Domain Intervals ended up fixing things in the realm of convexity as well, basic items, such as the analytical definition, and the paper First Note ended up fixing the geometric definition for convexity, so that S-convexity became a really useful and beautiful concept for Pure and Applied Mathematics. In this talk, we would like to discuss our final results on the analysis of the shape and the re-wording of the definitions.
From Third Note:
... We have just presented the new definition for the phenomenon S-convexity at the ANZIAM meeting. Our talk was named Time to Think of S-convexity [1]. The new definition is: ...
Preprint
Full-text available
In this note, we present a few more important scientific remarks regarding the S−convexity phenomenon. We talk about examples and fixings. We sustain the example we gave in Really Short Note, but fix the way we presented one of the counterexamples to the existing theorem that we there mentioned. We also present another two generators of elements for K 2 s. MSC(2010): 26A51
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.