ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Analgesic Mechanisms of Antidepressants for Neuropathic Pain

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors are used to treat chronic pain, such as neuropathic pain. Why antidepressants are effective for treatment of neuropathic pain and the precise mechanisms underlying their effects, however, remain unclear. The inhibitory effects of these antidepressants for neuropathic pain manifest more quickly than their antidepressive effects, suggesting different modes of action. Recent studies of animal models of neuropathic pain revealed that noradrenaline is extremely important for the inhibition of neuropathic pain. First, increasing noradrenaline in the spinal cord by reuptake inhibition directly inhibits neuropathic pain through α2-adrenergic receptors. Second, increasing noradrenaline acts on the locus coeruleus and improves the function of an impaired descending noradrenergic inhibitory system. Serotonin and dopamine may reinforce the noradrenergic effects to inhibit neuropathic pain. The mechanisms of neuropathic pain inhibition by antidepressants based mainly on experimental findings from animal models of neuropathic pain are discussed in this review.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2483; doi:10.3390/ijms18112483 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms
Review
Analgesic Mechanisms of Antidepressants for
Neuropathic Pain
Hideaki Obata
Center for Pain Management and Department of Anesthesiology, Fukushima Medical University,
1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima-City, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan; obata@fmu.ac.jp; Tel.: +81-24-547-1533
Received: 22 October 2017; Accepted: 19 November 2017; Published: 21 November 2017
Abstract: Tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors are used to treat
chronic pain, such as neuropathic pain. Why antidepressants are effective for treatment of
neuropathic pain and the precise mechanisms underlying their effects, however, remain unclear.
The inhibitory effects of these antidepressants for neuropathic pain manifest more quickly than their
antidepressive effects, suggesting different modes of action. Recent studies of animal models of
neuropathic pain revealed that noradrenaline is extremely important for the inhibition of
neuropathic pain. First, increasing noradrenaline in the spinal cord by reuptake inhibition directly
inhibits neuropathic pain through α
2
-adrenergic receptors. Second, increasing noradrenaline acts on
the locus coeruleus and improves the function of an impaired descending noradrenergic inhibitory
system. Serotonin and dopamine may reinforce the noradrenergic effects to inhibit neuropathic
pain. The mechanisms of neuropathic pain inhibition by antidepressants based mainly on
experimental findings from animal models of neuropathic pain are discussed in this review.
Keyword: noradrenaline; 5-HT; dopamine; spinal cord; α
2
-adrenergic receptors; locus coeruleus;
spinal nerve ligation; hyperalgesia; allodynia; rats
1. Introduction
Although antidepressants were not originally designed to act as analgesics, they are reported to
have analgesic effects for chronic pain. Antidepressants have virtually no antinociceptive effects, but
are considered first-line drugs of choice for neuropathic pain [1–4] and treatment of fibromyalgia [5].
Specific antidepressants with analgesic effects include tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), which have
long been used, and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), which are comparatively
new antidepressants. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), which are frequently used to
treat depression, are not effective against chronic pain [1–3].
2. Effects of Antidepressants on Neuropathic Pain Differ from Their Effects on Depression
Antidepressants, along with pregabalin/gabapentin (voltage-dependent calcium channels α2δ
subunit ligands) are used as first-line drugs for treating neuropathic pain [1–4]. Psychologic problems
play an important role in chronic pain. Protracted pain causes anxiety accompanied by a progressive
depressive state and enhanced pain sensations. Therefore, antidepressant medications may be
effective against chronic pain by their effects to improve the depressive state. Antidepressants inhibit
neuropathic pain, however, even when the patient is not in a depressive state [6]. In addition, the
effects of antidepressants on depression characteristically take approximately two to four weeks to
be observed from the time the drug is first taken, whereas the analgesic effects on chronic pain
manifest in as little as few days to one week [7]. Therefore, the analgesic effects of antidepressants on
chronic pain likely involve a mechanism different from that mediating their antidepressive effects.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2483 2 of 12
3. Noradrenaline Is Extremely Important for Inhibiting Neuropathic Pain
The pharmacologic effects of antidepressants involve binding to noradrenaline and serotonin (5-
HT) transporters. Reuptake of these neurotransmitters is inhibited, leading to increased levels of
noradrenaline and 5-HT in the synaptic cleft [8–11]. What type of antidepressants is most effective
against neuropathic pain? The “number needed to treat” (NNT) is an index used to compare the
efficacy of medications based on the results obtained in a variety of clinical studies (meta analysis)
and is represented as the number of patients treated for whom pain was reduced by up to 50%, with
a smaller numerical value indicating a stronger efficacy [12,13]. According to a report from Finnerup
et al., the NNT of TCA to inhibit peripheral neuropathic pain is approximately 2–3. The NNT of dual-
type TCAs (e.g., amitriptyline, imipramine, clomipramine), which inhibit reuptake of both
noradrenaline and 5-HT, is 2.1. The NNT for noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (nortriptyline,
desipramine) is approximately 2.5 [14]. The NNT for SNRI is 5.0 and for SSRI is 6.8 in painful
polyneuropathy [2]. Based on these results, an antidepressant that inhibits reuptake of both
noradrenaline and 5-HT has stronger analgesic effects than a drug that selectively inhibits reuptake
of only one of these neurotransmitters, and noradrenaline plays a greater role than 5-HT in the
analgesic action.
4. Noradrenaline Inhibits Neuropathic Pain in the Spinal Cord
Noradrenaline reuptake inhibition enhances analgesic effects, mainly through α2-adrenergic
receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. The α2-adrenergic receptors are coupled to the
inhibitory G protein (Gi/o), which inhibits the presynaptic voltage-gated Ca2+ channels in the dorsal
horn of the spinal cord that inhibits the release of excitatory neurotransmitters from primary afferent
fibers. At the same time, G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K+ channels are opened on the post-
synaptic spinal cord dorsal horn cells, the cell membranes are hyperpolarized, and excitability is
decreased [15]. While activation of the α2-adrenergic receptors of the spinal cord dorsal horn has
weak antinociceptive effects against noxious stimuli, extensive research indicates that it is extremely
effective against allodynia and hyperalgesia associated with neuropathic pain [16,17]. The reason for
the increasing efficacy for hypersensitivity of spinal α2-adrenergic receptors stimulation is that nerve
injury changes the function of α2-adrenergic receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord [18,19],
while at the same time the interaction with the cholinergic interneurons strengthens [20–23]. Our
findings support the importance of α2-adrenergic receptors in the spinal cord dorsal horn for the
inhibition of neuropathic pain. We used a rat model of neuropathic pain known as spinal nerve
ligation (SNL). In this procedure, the L5 spinal nerve is ligated on one side [24]. When mechanical
pressure is applied to the ipsilateral hind paw on the ligated side using a paw-pressure test, the
withdrawal threshold decreases and mechanical hyperalgesia develops. Intrathecal administration
of an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, dexmedetomidine, leads to the release of acetylcholine to the
spinal cord and mechanical hyperalgesia is inhibited through the muscarinic receptors [16]. In
animals with nerve injury, the α2-adrenergic receptors expressed in the cholinergic interneurons of
the spinal cord dorsal horn are coupled with excitatory G protein (GS) by the action of brain-derived
neurotrophic factor (BDNF) through TrkB receptor and acetylcholine is released by stimulation of the
α2 adrenergic receptors [23]. As a result, muscarinic receptors, which induce gamma-aminobutyric
acid (GABA) release [25,26], contribute to the inhibitory effects of α2-adrenergic receptor activation
for neuropathic pain (Figure 1). Thus, the pain relief mediated by noradrenaline in the dorsal horn of
the spinal cord is more effective for neuropathic pain than for nociceptive pain due to plastic changes
of the α2-adrenergic receptors.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2483 3 of 12
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of analgesic effects of antidepressants and noradrenaline in the dorsal
horn of the spinal cord. Antidepressants increase noradrenaline via blocking of noradrenaline
transporters at the terminal of the descending noradrenergic fiber from the locus coeruleus.
Noradrenaline inhibits acute pain through α2-adrenergic receptors by pre-synaptic (inhibit
neurotransmitters release) and post-synaptic (hyperpolarize cell membranes) mechanisms. In
neuropathic pain states, however, α2-adrenergic receptors in the cholinergic interneurons change
from inhibitory to excitatory through G-protein switch (from Gi to Gs) by the effect of brain-derived
neurotrophic factor (BDNF) increasing after nerve injury. Released acetylcholine bind to muscarinic
receptors, by which produce analgesia thorough GABA release. PAF; primary afferent fibers, NA;
noradrenaline, DHN; dorsal horn neurons, ACh; acetylcholine, Red circle; noradrenaline, Blue circle;
acetylcholine, Green circle; GABA, Pink circle; excitatory neurotransmitters.
Intraperitoneal administration of duloxetine, an SNRI, to SNL rats increases the withdrawal
threshold for at least 4 h, but the effect disappears after 24 h. When duloxetine is administered for
three consecutive days, the withdrawal threshold gradually increases and returns to pre-SNL levels.
This increase in the withdrawal threshold is reversed by intrathecal injection of idazoxan, an α2
adrenergic receptor antagonist, and the amount of noradrenaline in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord
increases after three daily injections of duloxetine [27] (Figure 2). In addition, in animals pretreated
with a noradrenergic neurotoxin (DSP-4), the antihyperalgesic effect of duloxetine is weakened [28].
Intraperitoneal administration of amitriptyline, a TCA, over consecutive days gradually increases the
withdrawal threshold, but this antihyperalgesic effect is reversed by intrathecal injection of an α2-
adrenergic antagonist [28].
Noradrenaline in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord is increased by a single intraperitoneal
injection of antidepressants such as amitriptyline (TCA), duloxetine and milnacipran (SNRI), or
fluoxetine and paroxetine (SSRI) (Figure 3). In addition, a single administration of paroxetine
produces an anti-hyperalgesic effect, which is inhibited by intrathecal injection of an α2-adrenergic
receptor antagonist [29] Fluoxetine and paroxetine have weak inhibitory effects on noradrenaline
transporters [30,31], and thus their effects to increase noradrenaline are likely indirect. These findings
suggest that the increase in noradrenaline in the spinal cord plays a crucial role in the inhibitory
effects of antidepressants on neuropathic pain.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2483 4 of 12
Figure 2. Antihyperalgesic effects of duloxetine in rats after nerve injury by noradrenaline increase in
the spinal cord. (A) Effects of three daily injections of duloxetine on hind paw mechanical
hyperalgesia after spinal nerve ligation (SNL) in rats. Rats were administered duloxetine
(10 mg/kg/day, subcutaneous injection) or vehicle for three consecutive days. Each day, withdrawal
thresholds in ipsilateral hind paw were measured at time 0 (baseline: before each duloxetine
injection), and 120 and 240 min after the injection. Three daily treatment increased baseline
withdrawal thresholds (time 0) of on days 3 and 4 than on day 1 (* p <0.05 compared with the
duloxetine group at time 0 on day 1). Acute antihyperalgesic effects until 240 min after injection were
also observed. Then, rats were injected intrathecally (i.t.) with idazoxan, an α2-adrenoceptor
antagonist (30 μg/20 μL) or vehicle. The injection of idazoxan reversed the antihyperalgesic effect of
duloxetine (* p <0.05 compared with the vehicle group at each time-point). (B) Spinal cord tissue from
SNL rats injected with duloxetine (10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle for three consecutive days was
homogenized, and the noradrenaline content was measured. Noradrenaline was increased with
duloxetine treatment at both ipsilateral and contralateral to the SNL compared to the vehicle group
(* p <0.05). Data in this figure published from Ref. [27].
Figure 3. Percentage changes of noradrenaline, dopamine, and 5-HT levels in the dorsal horn of the
lumbar spinal cord in rats after intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg/kg of amitriptyline (TCA),
duloxetine (SNRI), milnacipran (SNRI), fluoxetine (SSRI) and Paroxetine (SSRI). Under isoflurane
anesthesia, microdialysis studies ware performed after thoracolumbar laminectomy,
and monoamines were measured by using high-performance liquid chromatography
with electrochemical detection. All monoamines were increased after injection of all antidepressants
(all p <0.05 compared to control; saline or vehicle, by two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance.
Some data in this figure published from Ref. [32]).
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2483 5 of 12
5. Actions of Antidepressants on the Locus Coeruleus
The locus coeruleus (LC) comprises a group of nerve cells containing noradrenaline located
bilaterally in the brain. The LC has the greatest amount of noradrenaline in the central nervous system
and is located on the right and left of the posterior brainstem facing the fourth ventricle [33,34].
Noradrenergic nerve fibers project virtually throughout the entire central nervous system and play a
role in sleep, wakefulness, cognition, learning and stress in the brain [35–37]. In the spinal cord,
noradrenergic nerve fibers regulate endogenous analgesia, posture and motion, the autonomous
nervous system, and other vital functions [38–40]. The neuronal activity of the LC is characterized by
a tonic (autonomous activity) mode and a phasic (activity that reacts to stimulus) mode. Phasic
activity is an excitatory reaction within a short period of time in which stimuli induce the release of
an excitatory amino acid (mainly glutamic acid) in the LC. Phasic activity during the tonic activity
mode at a medium level from a lower level plays an important role in attention, movement and
concentration on outside stimuli, such as cognitive functions, endogenous analgesia and a variety of
other vital functions [35,41]. Descending noradrenergic neurons are an extremely important
mechanism of endogenous analgesia. In rats, the bilateral LC is excited phasically by noxious
stimulation, and releases noradrenaline through projections to the bilateral spinal cord dorsal
horn [38,41,42].
How does the activity of the descending noradrenergic inhibitory system from the LC change in
a neuropathic pain state? Noxious stimulation induced analgesia (NSIA) is an animal model in which
the intensity of endogenous analgesia can be measured. The withdrawal threshold in response to the
mechanical stimulus on the hind paw greatly increases after forepaw capsaicin injection by activation
of the endogenous analgesia [43]. An increase in noradrenaline in the spinal cord affects the
NSIA [41,43,44]. This means that the LC is activated phasically due to the pain induced by the
capsaicin, and the noradrenaline that is released to the spinal cord mediates antinociceptive effects
through α2-adrenergic receptors. When the same experiment was carried out using animal models of
neuropathic pain (SNL animals), the NSIA was no longer recognized six weeks after nerve injury (an
increase in the withdrawal threshold of the hind paw no longer occurred when capsaicin was
administered to the forepaw), and the noradrenaline is not increased in the spinal cord [27,41,44]. At
this time, the tonic nerve activity of the LC increased due to nerve injury, but the phasic reactivity to
the noxious stimuli disappeared [41]. Based on these results, the phasic activity of the neuronal cells
of the LC gradually declined in the neuropathic pain model after a long period of time had passed
from the nerve injury, and the descending noradrenergic inhibitory system was impaired.
In animals with nerve injury and impaired NSIA, administering duloxetine and amitriptyline
over several consecutive days recovers the NSIA [27,44]. Although the increase in noradrenaline in
the spinal cord induced by these antidepressants plays a part in the NSIA recovery, it is possible that
the effect of the drugs on the LC contributed to the effect. The LC receives inputs from a variety of
sites of the central nervous system and its activity is controlled by both noradrenaline and 5-HT [45].
Antidepressants increase noradrenaline around the LC [46], and inhibit the activity of the LC through
α2- adrenergic receptors [47,48]. In contrast, another report suggests that when duloxetine and
desipramine are administered consecutively, the increased noradrenaline desensitizes the
α2-adrenergic receptors in the LC [49]. In animal models of neuropathic pain, the reaction of the LC
to noxious stimuli differs from that in normal animals due to sensitization via N-methyl-D-aspartic
acid (NMDA) receptors, but this report indicates that the reaction is normalized by the consecutive
administration of duloxetine and desipramine [49].
Furthermore, a previous study demonstrated that nerve injury increases the basal extracellular
glutamate concentration in the LC [41], which may reduce noxious stimulation-evoked glutamate
release, thereby diminishing α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazoleproprionic acid (AMPA)
receptor-mediated LC activation, which is important for inducing NSIA. Another previous study
demonstrated that antidepressants increased BDNF levels in astrocyte cultures [50]. BDNF triggers
AMPA receptor GluA1 phosphorylation and regulates trafficking of the AMPA receptor to the cell
membrane [51]. Therefore, antidepressants may reactivate impaired LC function after nerve injury
by increasing BDNF levels.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2483 6 of 12
6. The Role of 5-HT
Many antidepressants block 5-HT transporters, leading to increased 5-HT in the synaptic cleft.
The role of 5-HT on the inhibitory effects of antidepressants against neuropathic pain, however, is
unclear. Although SSRIs are popular drugs for the treatment of depression, they are not
recommended for the treatment of neuropathic pain [1–3]. Despite some reports of their effectiveness
in randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic pain, the NNT for SSRIs is higher than that
for TCA and SNRI [2,14]. For this reason, 5-HT is thought to play a less important role than
noradrenaline in the inhibition of neuropathic pain, but simultaneous administration of
noradrenaline and 5-HT selective reuptake inhibitors in an animal experiment produce a synergistic
analgesic effect [52], suggesting that 5-HT has auxiliary actions.
5-HT in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord greatly contributes to pain modulation. Inhibitory
5-HT1A receptors, and excitatory 5-HT2A/2C, 5-HT3, and 5-HT7 receptors that strongly contribute to
nociceptive transmission are expressed in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord [53–56]. These receptors
are present in the pre-synaptic terminals of primary afferent nerve fibers, inhibitory interneurons,
excitatory interneurons and projection neurons, and modify nociceptive transmission. When the pain
sensation reaches the brain, the descending inhibitory system is mobilized from a variety of sites in
the cerebral cortex and activates the periaqueductal gray (PAG) [56,57]. The PAG closely controls the
rostroventromedial medulla (RVM) and modifies pain via projecting fibers from the RVM to the
dorsal horn of the spinal cord [56–58]. The RVM includes the nucleus raphe magnus, which projects
abundant serotonergic fibers to the spinal cord dorsal horn [58]. Descending serotonergic projections
from the RVM to the spinal cord dorsal horn exert both inhibitory and facilitatory effects on pain
processing depending on the pain state, acute or chronic [58–60]. In neuropathic pain models, many
studies reported that ablation of descending 5-HT pathways inhibit pain hypersensitivity [61–63],
and have also demonstrated that nerve injury induces descending facilitation by activating spinal 5-
HT3 receptors [64,65]. Activation of descending serotonergic neurons form the RVM is required,
however, for this descending facilitation to occur. In contrast, direct intrathecal injection of 5-HT or a
5-HT3 agonist inhibits allodynia in a rat neuropathic pain model [66,67]. Systemic administration of
paroxetine, an SSRI, produces an anti-hyperalgesic effect in a rat model of neuropathic pain through
spinal 5-HT3 receptors [29], because the drug directly increases 5-HT in the spinal cord by inhibiting
5-HT transporters.
Several lines of evidence suggest that 5-HT receptor function changes in neuropathic pain states.
Although 5-HT2A receptors in the spinal cord dorsal horn contribute to the suppression of
neuropathic pain [68–70], the inhibitory effects of systemically administered SSRIs on hyperalgesia
after nerve injury are stronger when spinal 5-HT2A receptors are disrupted from their associated PDZ
proteins by intrathecal injection of a peptide (TAT-2ASCV) [71]. Systemic administration of a 5-HT1A
receptor agonist (NLX-112) strongly inhibits inflammatory pain, but is less effective against
neuropathic pain [72].
Thus, there are many reports suggesting a less important role for 5-HT in inhibition of
neuropathic pain compared to acute pain. Increased 5-HT in the spinal cord by antidepressants may,
however, play some inhibitory role for neuropathic pain.
7. The Role of Dopamine
Descending dopaminergic neurons, which project from the mesolimbic A11 dopamine cell
group to the spinal cord dorsal horn, release dopamine in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and
inhibit nociceptive transmission by mediating dopamine D2-like receptors [73,74]. Buproprion, a
dopamine noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, increases noradrenaline and dopamine levels in the
spinal cord and suppresses hyperalgesia in a rat neuropathic pain model through α2-adrenergic
receptors and D2-like receptors [75]. No other antidepressants are reported to strongly inhibit
dopamine transporters. Nevertheless, we demonstrated that intraperitoneal administration of
amitriptyline (TCA), duloxetine and milnacipran (SNRI) and fluoxetine (SSRI) at a dose of 10 mg/kg,
all increased dopamine in the spinal cord and inhibited hyperalgesia in a rat model of neuropathic
pain through D2-like receptors [32]. There are few dopamine transporters in the frontal cortex and
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2483 7 of 12
reuptake of dopamine is mediated by noradrenaline transporters [76]. It is unclear why
antidepressants increase dopamine levels in the spinal cord.
Dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (A10) release dopamine in the nucleus
accumbens and enhance analgesic activity through D2-like receptors [77–79]. A previous study
demonstrated that duloxetine (25 mg/kg orally) increases dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, but
amitriptyline and maprotiline (both 50 mg/kg orally) do not have this effect [80]. Dopamine enhances
the antinociceptive effects in the striatum [81,82]. Although it is unclear whether antidepressants
increase dopamine in these brain areas, dopamine increases in the central nervous system are likely
to play a role in the inhibitory effect of antidepressants on neuropathic pain.
8. Other Actions
Antidepressants have a number of other actions in addition to increasing monoamines that may
contribute to the inhibition of neuropathic pain. First, they act as sodium channel blockers [83,84].
Sodium channel blockers inhibit ectopic discharges occurring when there is nerve damage, thereby
inhibiting neuropathic pain [85,86]. Second, some antidepressants act as NMDA receptor
antagonists [87,88]. NMDA receptors, which are expressed in the neurons of the dorsal horn of the
spinal cord, induce wind-up and central sensitization result in contribute to the onset and
maintenance of neuropathic pain [89,90].
TCAs also act as α1-adrenergic receptors [91], calcium channel blockers [92], potassium channel
activators [93], modulate the adenosine system [94] and increase GABA-B receptor function [95].
They activate opioid receptors [96], inhibit the production of nitric oxide, prostaglandin E2 [97] and
have a variety of other actions that may inhibit neuropathic pain in a complex manner.
9. Conclusions
The main mechanism of antidepressants that inhibit neuropathic pain is first, to increase
noradrenaline in the spinal cord, and second, to act on the LC, thereby directly inhibiting pain and
activating the impaired descending noradrenergic inhibitory system. Dopamine and 5-HT also
increase in the central nervous system and may enhance the inhibitory effects of noradrenaline in an
auxiliary manner.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Finnerup, N.B.; Attal, N.; Haroutounian, S.; McNicol, E.; Baron, R.; Dworkin, R.H.; Gilron, I.; Haanpää, M.;
Hansson, P.; Jensen, T.S.; et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015, 14, 162–173, doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70251-0.
2. Finnerup, N.B.; Sindrup, S.H.; Jensen, T.S. The evidence for pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain.
Pain 2010, 150, 573–581, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.019.
3. Attal, N.; Cruccu, G.; Baron, R.; Haanpää, M.; Hansson, P.; Jensen, T.S.; Nurmikko, T. EFNS guidelines on
the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision. Eur. J. Neurol. 2010, 17, 1113-e88,
doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02999.x.
4. Dworkin, R.H.; O’Connor, B.; Backonja, M.; Farrar, J.T.; Finnerup, N.B.; Jensen, T.S.; Kalso, E.A.; Loeser,
J.D.; Miaskowski, C.; Nurmikko, T.J.; et al. Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: Evidence-
based recommendations. Pain 2007, 132, 237–251, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.033.
5. Calandre, E.P.; Rico-Villademoros, F.; Slim, M. An update on pharmacotherapy for the treatment of
fibromyalgia. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2015, 16, 1347–1368, doi:10.1517/14656566.2015.1047343.
6. Fishbain, D.A.; Cutler, R.B.; Rosomoff, H.L.; Rosomoff, R.S. Do antidepressants have an analgesic effect in
psychogenic pain and somatoform pain disorder? A meta-analysis. Psychosom. Med. 1998, 60, 503–509.
7. Onghena, P.; van houdenhove, B. Antidepressant-induced analgesia in chronic non-malignant pain: A
meta-analysis of 39 placebo-controlled studies. Pain 1992, 49, 205–219.
8. Micó, J.A.; Ardid, D.; Berrocoso, E.; Eschalier, A. Antidepressants and pain. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 27,
348–354, doi:10.1016/j.tips.2006.05.004.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2483 8 of 12
9. Dharmshaktu, P.; Tayal, V.; Kalra, B.S. Efficacy of antidepressants as analgesics: A review. J. Clin. Pharmacol.
2012, 52, 6–17, doi:10.1177/0091270010394852.
10. Berton, O.; Nestler, E.J. New approaches to antidepressant drug discovery: Beyond monoamines. Nat. Rev.
Neurosci. 2006, 7, 137–151, doi:10.1038/nrn1846.
11. Sindrup, S.H.; Otto, M.; Finnerup, N.B.; Jensen, T.S. Antidepressants in the treatment of neuropathic pain.
Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005, 96, 399–409, doi:10.1111/j.1742–7843.2005.pto_96696601.x.
12. McQuay, H.J.; Tramèr, M.; Nye, B.A.; Carroll, D.; Wiffen, P.J.; Moore, R.A. A systematic review of
antidepressants in neuropathic pain. Pain 1996, 68, 217–227.
13. Cook, R.J.; Sackett, D.L. The number needed to treat: A clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ
1996, 310, 452–454, doi:10.1177/135581969800300110.
14. Finnerup, N.B.; Otto, M.; McQuay, H.J.; Jensen, T.S.; Sindrup, S.H. Algorithm for neuropathic pain
treatment: An evidence based proposal. Pain 2005, 118, 289–305, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.013.
15. Pan, H.L.; Wu, Z.Z.; Zhou, H.Y.; Chen, S.R.; Zhang, H.M.; Li, D.P. Modulation of pain transmission by, G-
protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 117, 141–161, doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.09.003.
16. Kimura, M.; Saito, S.; Obata, H. Dexmedetomidine decreases hyperalgesia in neuropathic pain by
increasing acetylcholine in the spinal cord. Neurosci. Lett. 2012, 529, 70–74, doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.08.008.
17. Paqueron, X.; Conklin, D.; Eisenach, J.C. Plasticity in action of intrathecal clonidine to mechanical but not
thermal nociception after peripheral nerve injury. Anesthesiology 2003, 99, 199–204.
18. Bantel, C.; Eisenach, J.C.; Duflo, F.; Tobin, J.R.; Childers, S.R. Spinal nerve ligation increases alpha2-
adrenergic receptor, G-protein coupling in the spinal cord. Brain Res. 2005, 1038, 76–82.
19. Eisenach, J.C.; Zhang, Y.; Duflo, F. Alpha2-adrenoceptors inhibit the intracellular, Ca2+ response to electrical
stimulation in normal and injured sensory neurons, with increased inhibition of calcitonin gene-related
peptide expressing neurons after injury. Neuroscience 2005, 131, 189–197.
20. Pan, H.L.; Chen, S.R.; Eisenach, J.C. Intrathecal clonidine alleviates allodynia in neuropathic rats:
Interaction with spinal muscarinic and nicotinic receptors. Anesthesiology 1999, 90, 509–514.
21. Paqueron, X.; Li, X.; Bantel, C.; Tobin, J.R.; Voytko, M.L.; Eisenach, J.C. An obligatory role for spinal
cholinergic neurons in the antiallodynic effects of clonidine after peripheral nerve injury. Anesthesiology
2001, 94, 1074–1081.
22. Obata, H.; Li, X.; Eisenach, J.C. Alpha2-Adrenoceptor activation by clonidine enhances stimulation-evoked
acetylcholine release from spinal cord tissue after nerve ligation in rats. Anesthesiology 2005, 102, 657–662.
23. Hayashida, K.; Eisenach, J.C. Spinal alpha2-adrenoceptor-mediated analgesia in neuropathic pain reflects
brain-derived nerve growth factor and changes in spinal cholinergic neuronal function. Anesthesiology 2010,
113, 406–412, doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181de6d2c.
24. Kim, S.H.; Chung, J.M. An experimental model for peripheral neuropathy produced by segmental spinal
nerve ligation in the rat. Pain 1992, 50, 355–563.
25. Baba, H.; Kohno, T.; Okamoto, M; Goldstein, P.A.; Shimoji, K.; Yoshimura, M. Muscarinic facilitation of,
GABA release in substantia gelatinosa of the rat spinal dorsal horn. J Physiol. 1998, 508, 83–93.
26. Kimura, M.; Hayashida, K.; Eisenach, J.C.; Saito, S.; Obata, H. Relief of hypersensitivity after nerve injury
from systemic donepezil involves spinal cholinergic and γ-aminobutyric acid mechanisms. Anesthesiology
2013, 118, 173–180, doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e318277a81c.
27. Ito, S.; Suto, T.; Saito, S.; Obata, H. Repeated administration of duloxetine suppresses neuropathic pain by
accumulating effects of noradrenaline in the spinal cord. Anesth. Analg. 2017,
doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002380.
28. Hiroki, T.; Suto, T.; Saito, S.; Obata, H. Repeated administration of amitriptyline in neuropathic pain:
Modulation of the noradrenergic descending inhibitory system. Anesth, Analg. 2017, 125, 1281–1288,
doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002352.
29. Nakajima, K.; Obata, H.; Iriuchijima, N.; Saito, S. An increase in spinal cord noradrenaline is a major
contributor to the antihyperalgesic effect of antidepressants after peripheral nerve injury in the rat. Pain
2012, 153, 990–997, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.01.029.
30. Andersen, J.; Stuhr-Hansen, N.; Zachariassen, L.G.; Koldsø, H.; Schiøtt, B.; Strømgaard, K.; Kristensen, A.S.
Molecular basis for selective serotonin reuptake inhibition by the antidepressant agent fluoxetine (Prozac).
Mol. Pharmacol. 2014, 85, 703–714, doi:10.1124/mol.113.091249.
31. Owens, M.J.; Knight, D.L.; Nemeroff, C.B. Paroxetine binding to the rat norepinephrine transporter in vivo.
Biol. Psychiatry 2000, 47, 842–845.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2483 9 of 12
32. Chen, M.; Hoshino, H.; Saito, S.; Yang, Y.; Obata, H. Spinal dopaminergic involvement in the
antihyperalgesic effect of antidepressants in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Neurosci, Lett. 2017, 649, 116–
123, doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2017.04.017
33. Baker, K.G.; Tork, I.; Hornung, J.P.; Halasz, P. The human locus coeruleus complex: An
immunohistochemical and three dimensional reconstruction study. Exp. Brain Res. 1989, 77, 257–270.
34. Goldman, G.; Coleman, P.D. Neuron numbers in locus coeruleus do not change with age in, Fisher 344 rat.
Neurobiol. Aging 1981, 2, 33–36.
35. Aston-Jones, G.; Bloom, F.E. Activity of norepinephrine-containing locus coeruleus neurons in behaving
rats anticipates fluctuations in the sleep-waking cycle. J. Neurosci. 1981, 1, 876–886.
36. Berridge, C.W.; Waterhouse, B.D. The locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system: Modulation of behavioral
state and state-dependent cognitive processes. Brain Res. Rev. 2003, 42, 33–84.
37. Borodovitsyna, O.; Flamini, M.; Chandler, D. Noradrenergic modulation of cognition in health and disease.
Neural. Plast. 2017, 2017, doi:10.1155/2017/6031478.
38. Tsuruoka, M.; Tamaki, J.; Maeda, M.; Hayashi, B.; Inoue, T. Biological implications of coeruleospinal
inhibition of nociceptive processing in the spinal cord. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2012, 6,
doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00087.
39. Pompeiano, O. Vasopressin in the locus coeruleus and dorsal pontine tegmentum affects posture and
vestibulospinal reflexes. Prog. Brain Res. 1998, 119, 537–554.
40. Szabadi, E. Functional neuroanatomy of the central noradrenergic system. J. Psychopharmacol. 2013, 27, 659–
693, doi:10.1177/0269881113490326.
41. Kimura, M.; Suto, T.; Morado-Urbina, C.E.; Peters, C.M.; Eisenach, J.C.; Hayashida, K. Impaired pain-
evoked analgesia after nerve injury in rats reflects altered glutamate regulation in the locus coeruleus.
Anesthesiology 2015, 123, 899–908, doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000796.
42. Howorth, P.W.; Teschemacher, A.G.; Pickering, A.E. Retrograde adenoviral vector targeting of
nociresponsive pontospinal noradrenergic neurons in the rat in vivo. J Comp. Neurol. 2009, 512, 141–157,
doi:10.1002/cne.21879.
43. Peters, C.M.; Hayashida, K.; Suto, T.; Houle, T.T.; Aschenbrenner, C.A.; Martin, T.J.; Eisenach, J.C.
Individual differences in acute pain-induced endogenous analgesia predict time to resolution of
postoperative pain in the rat. Anesthesiology 2015, 122, 895–907, doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000593.
44. Matsuoka, H.; Suto, T.; Saito, S.; Obata, H. Amitriptyline, but not pregabalin, reverses the attenuation of
noxious stimulus-induced analgesia after nerve injury in rats. Anesth. Analg. 2016, 123, 504–510,
doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001301.
45. Singewald, N.; Philippu, A. Release of neurotransmitters in the locus coeruleus. Prog. Neurobiol. 1998, 56,
237–267.
46. Mateo, Y.; Fernández-Pastor, B.; Meana, J.J. Acute and chronic effects of desipramine and clorgyline on
alpha(2)-adrenoceptors regulating noradrenergic transmission in the rat brain: A dual-probe microdialysis
study. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2001, 133, 1362–1370, doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704196.
47. Grandoso, L.; Pineda, J.; Ugedo, L. Comparative study of the effects of desipramine and reboxetine on locus
coeruleus neurons in rat brain slices. Neuropharmacology 2004, 46, 815–823,
doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2003.11.033
48. Grant, M.M.; Weiss, J.M. Effects of chronic antidepressant drug administration and electroconvulsive shock
on locus coeruleus electrophysiologic activity. Biol. Psychiatry 2001, 49, 117–129.
49. Alba-Delgado, C.; Mico, J.A.; Sánchez-Blázquez, P.; Berrocoso, E. Analgesic antidepressants promote the
responsiveness of locus coeruleus neurons to noxious stimulation: Implications for neuropathic pain. Pain
2012, 153, 1438–1449, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.03.034.
50. Kajitani, N.; Hisaoka-Nakashima, K.; Morioka, N.; Okada-Tsuchioka, M.; Kaneko, M.; Kasai, M.; Shibasaki,
C.; Nakata, Y.; Takebayashi, M. Antidepressant acts on astrocytes leading to an increase in the expression
of neurotrophic/growth factors: Differential regulation of, FGF-2 by noradrenaline. PLoS ONE 2012, 7,
e51197, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051197.
51. Reimers, J.M.; Loweth, J.A.; Wolf, M.E. BDNF contributes to both rapid and homeostatic alterations in,
AMPA receptor surface expression innucleus accumbens medium spiny neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2014, 39,
1159–1169, doi:10.1111/ejn.12422.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2483 10 of 12
52. Leventhal, L.; Smith, V.; Hornby, G.; Andree, T.H.; Brandt, M.R.; Rogers, K.E. Differential and synergistic
effects of selective norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitors in rodent models of pain. J. Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther. 2007, 320, 1178–1185, doi:10.1124/jpet.106.109728.
53. Bardin, L. The complex role of serotonin and 5-HT receptors in chronic pain. Behav. Pharmacol. 2011, 22,
390–404, doi:10.1097/FBP.0b013e328349aae4.
54. Viguier, F.; Michot, B.; Hamon, M.; Bourgoin, S. Multiple roles of serotonin in pain control mechanisms—
Implications of 5-HT7 and other 5-HT receptor types. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 716, 8–16,
doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.01.074.
55. Yoshimura, M.; Furue, H. Mechanisms for the anti-nociceptive actions of the descending noradrenergic
and serotonergic systems in the spinal cord. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 101, 107–117.
56. Millan, M.J. Descending control of pain. Prog. Neurobiol. 2002, 66, 355–474.
57. Bliss, T.V.; Collingridge, G.L.; Kaang, B.K.; Zhuo, M. Synaptic plasticity in the anterior cingulate cortex in
acute and chronic pain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016, 17, 485–496, doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.68.
58. Fields, H.L.; Heinricher, M.M.; Mason, P. Neurotransmitters in nociceptive modulatory circuits. Annu. Rev.
Neurosci. 1991, 14, 219–245, doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.14.030191.001251.
59. Vanegas, H.; Schaible, H.G. Descending control of persistent pain: Inhibitory or facilitatory? Brain Res. Brain
Res. Rev. 2004, 46, 295–309, doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.07.004.
60. Kuner, R. Central mechanisms of pathological pain. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 1258–1266, doi:10.1038/nm.2231.
61. Porreca, F.; Ossipov, M.H.; Gebhart, G.F. Chronic pain and medullary descending facilitation. Trends
Neurosci. 2002, 25, 319–325.
62. Wei, F.; Dubner, R.; Zou, S.; Ren, K.; Bai, G.; Wei, D.; Guo, W. Molecular depletion of descending serotonin
unmasks its novel facilitatory role in the development of persistent pain. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 8624–8636,
doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5389-09.2010.
63. Rahman, W.; Suzuki, R.; Webber, M.; Hunt, S.P.; Dickenson, A.H. Depletion of endogenous spinal 5-HT
attenuates the behavioural hypersensitivity to mechanical and cooling stimuli induced by spinal nerve
ligation. Pain 2006, 123, 264–274, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.033.
64. Suzuki, R.; Rahman, W.; Hunt, S.P.; Dickenson, A.H. Descending facilitatory control of mechanically
evoked responses is enhanced in deep dorsal horn neurones following peripheral nerve injury. Brain Res.
2004, 1019, 68–76.
65. Bannister, K.; Patel, R.; Goncalves, L.; Townson, L.; Dickenson, A.H. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls
and nerve injury: Restoring an imbalance between descending monoamine inhibitions and facilitations.
Pain 2015, 156, 1803–1811, doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000240.
66. Avila-Rojas, S.H.; Velázquez-Lagunas, I.; Salinas-Abarca, A.B.; Barragán-Iglesias, P.; Pineda-Farias, J.B.;
Granados-Soto, V. Role of spinal 5-HT5A, and 5-HT1A/1B/1D, receptors in neuropathic pain induced by
spinal nerve ligation in rats. Brain Res. 2015, 1622, 377–385, doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.06.043.
67. Okazaki, R.; Namba, H.; Yoshida, H.; Okai, H.; Miura, T.; Kawamura, M. The antiallodynic effect of,
Neurotropin is mediated via activation of descending pain inhibitory systems in rats with spinal nerve
ligation. Anesth. Analg. 2008, 107, 1064–1069, doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e31817e7a59.
68. Obata, H.; Saito, S.; Sasaki, M.; Ishizaki, K.; Goto, F. Antiallodynic effect of intrathecally administered 5-
HT(2) agonists in rats with nerve ligation. Pain 2001, 90, 173–179.
69. Sasaki, M.; Obata, H.; Saito, S.; Goto, F. Antinociception with intrathecal alpha-methyl-5-
hydroxytryptamine, a 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A/2C receptor agonist, in two rat models of sustained pain.
Anesth. Analg. 2003, 96, 1072–1078.
70. Song, Z.; Meyerson, B.A.; Linderoth, B. Spinal 5-HT receptors that contribute to the pain-relieving effects
of spinal cord stimulation in a rat model of neuropathy. Pain 2011, 152, 1666–1673,
doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.012.
71. Wattiez, A.S; Dupuis, A.; Privat, A.M.; Chalus, M.; Chapuy, E.; Aissouni, Y.; Eschalier, A.; Courteix, C.
Disruption of 5-HT2A-PDZ protein interaction differently affects the analgesic efficacy of, SSRI, SNRI and,
TCA in the treatment of traumatic neuropathic pain in rats. Neuropharmacology 2017, 125, 308–318,
doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.07.034.
72. Sałat, K.; Kołaczkowski, M.; Furgała, A.; Rojek, A.; Śniecikowska, J.; Varney, M.A.Newman-Tancredi, A.
Antinociceptive, antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects of the 5-HT1A receptor selective agonist, NLX-
112 in mouse models of pain. Neuropharmacology 2017, 125, 181–188, doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.07.022.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2483 11 of 12
73. Fleetwood-walker, S.M.; Hope, P.J.; Mitchell, R. Antinociceptive actions of descending dopaminergic tracts
on cat and rat dorsal horn somatosensory neurones. J. Physiol. 1988, 399, 335–348.
74. Taniguchi, W.; Nakatsuka, T.; Miyazaki, N.; Yamada, H.; Takeda, D.; Fujita, T.; Kumamoto, E.; Yoshida, M.
In vivo patch-clamp analysis of dopaminergic antinociceptive actions on substantia gelatinosa neurons in
the spinal cord. Pain 2011, 152, 95–105, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.034.
75. Hoshino, H.; Obata, H.; Nakajima, K.; Mieda, R.; Saito, S. The antihyperalgesic effects of intrathecal
bupropion, a dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Anesth.
Analg. 2015, 120, 460–466, doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000540.
76. Morón, J.A.; Brockington, A.; Wise, R.A.; Rocha, B.A.; Hope, B.T. Dopamine uptake through the
norepinephrine transporter in brain regions with low levels of the dopamine transporter: Evidence from
knock-out mouse lines. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 389–395.
77. Taylor, B.K.; Joshi, C.; Uppal, H. Stimulation of dopamine, D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens inhibits
inflammatory pain. Brain. Res. 2003, 987, 135–143.
78. Moradi, M.; Yazdnian, M.; Haghparast, A. Role of dopamine, D2-like receptors within the ventral
tegmental area and nucleus accumbens in antinociception induced by lateral hypothalamus stimulation.
Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 292, 508–514, doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.007.
79. Wakaizumi, K.; Kondo, T.; Hamada, Y.; Narita, M.; Kawabe, R.; Narita, H.; Watanabe, M.; Kato, S.; Senba,
E.; Kobayashi, K.; et al. Involvement of mesolimbic dopaminergic network in neuropathic pain relief by
treadmill exercise: A study for specific neural control with, Gi-DREADD in mice. Mol. Pain 2016, 12,
doi:10.1177/1744806916681567.
80. Kihara, T.; Ikeda, M. Effects of duloxetine, a new serotonin and norepinephrine uptake inhibitor, on
extracellular monoamine levels in rat frontal cortex. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1995, 272, 177–183.
81. Magnusson, J.E.; Fisher, K. The involvement of dopamine in nociception: The role of, D(1) and, D(2)
receptors in the dorsolateral striatum. Brain Res. 2000, 855, 260–266.
82. Ansah, O.B.; Leite-Almeida, H.; Wei, H.; Pertovaara, A. Striatal dopamine, D2 receptors attenuate
neuropathic hypersensitivity in the rat. Exp. Neurol. 2007, 205, 536–546, doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.03.010.
83. Dick, I.E.; Brochu, R.M.; Purohit, Y.; Kaczorowski, G.J.; Martin, W.J.; Priest, B.T. Sodium channel blockade
may contribute to the analgesic efficacy of antidepressants. J. Pain 2007, 8, 315–324,
doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2006.10.001.
84. Sudoh, Y.; Cahoon, E.E.; Gerner, P.; Wang, G.K. Tricyclic antidepressants as long-acting local anesthetics.
Pain 2003, 103, 49–55.
85. Kalso, E. Sodium channel blockers in neuropathic pain. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11, 3005–3011.
86. Devor, M. Sodium channels and mechanisms of neuropathic pain. J. Pain 2006, 7 (Suppl. S1), S3–S12,
doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2005.09.006.
87. Barygin, O.I.; Nagaeva, E.I.; Tikhonov, D.B.; Belinskaya, D.A.; Vanchakova, N.P.; Shestakova, N.N.
Inhibition of the, NMDA and, AMPA receptor channels by antidepressants and antipsychotics. Brain Res.
2017, 1660, 58–66, doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2017.01.028.
88. Kohno, T.; Kimura, M.; Sasaki, M.; Obata, H.; Amaya, F.; Saito, S. Milnacipran inhibits glutamatergic, N-
methyl-D-aspartate receptor activity in spinal dorsal horn neurons. Mol. Pain 2012, 8, doi:10.1186/1744-8069-
8-45.
89. Dickenson, A.H; Chapman, V.; Green, G.M. The pharmacology of excitatory and inhibitory amino acid-
mediated events in the transmission and modulation of pain in the spinal cord. Gen. Pharmacol. 1997, 28,
633–638.
90. Herrero, J.F.; Laird, J.M.; López-García, J.A. Wind-up of spinal cord neurones and pain sensation: Much
ado about something? Prog. Neurobiol. 2000, 61, 169–203.
91. Yokogawa, F.; Kiuchi, Y.; Ishikawa, Y.; Otsuka, N.; Masud, Y, Oguchi, K.; Hosoyamada, A. An investigation
of monoamine receptors involved in antinociceptive effects of antidepressants. Anesth. Analg. 2002, 95, 163–
168.
92. Antkiewicz-Michaluk, L.; Romańska, I.; Michaluk, J.; Vetulani, J. Role of calcium channels in effects of
antidepressant drugs on responsiveness to pain. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1991, 105, 269–274.
93. Galeotti, N.; Ghelardini, C.; Bartolini, A. Involvement of potassium channels in amitriptyline and
clomipramine analgesia. Neuropharmacology 2001, 40, 75–84.
94. Phillis, J.W.; Wu, P.H. The effect of various centrally active drugs on adenosine uptake by the central
nervous system. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1982, 72C, 179–187.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2483 12 of 12
95. McCarson, K.E.; Duric, V.; Reisman, S.A.; Winter, M.; Enna, S.J. GABA(B) receptor function and subunit
expression in the rat spinal cord as indicators of stress and the antinociceptive response to antidepressants.
Brain Res. 2006, 1068, 109–117, doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.015.
96. Isenberg, K.E.; Cicero, T.J. Possible involvement of opiate receptors in the pharmacological profiles of
antidepressant compounds. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1984, 103, 57–63.
97. Yaron, I.; Shirazi, I.; Judovich, R.; Levartovsky, D.; Caspi, D.; Yaron, M. Fluoxetine and amitriptyline inhibit
nitric oxide, prostaglandin, E2, and hyaluronic acid production in human synovial cells and synovial tissue
cultures. Arthritis Rheumatol. 1999, 42, 2561–2568, doi:10.1002/1529–0131(1999e12)42:12<2561::AID-
ANR8>3.0.CO;2-U.
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
... The analgesic pathway mediated by α2 receptors, involves Gi-mediated inhibition of presynaptic Ca +2 channels, preventing glutamate (excitatory neurotransmitter) from being released from primary afferent fibers [68]. Simultaneously, the opening of K + channels results in hyperpolarization, causing a decrease in the excitability of postsynaptic cells [69]. Agonists of these receptors have analgesic properties involving peripheral and central mechanisms [70]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Ximenia americana L. (Olacaceae) has traditionally been used in folk medicine in the African continent and Brazilian Northeast to treat diseases such as diarrhea, fever, wounds, and pain. This study evaluated the antinociceptive effect of the Ximenia americana L. bark extract (HEXA) and its primary component, caffeic acid (CA), through in vivo assays. The antinociceptive properties were assessed using abdominal writhing, hot plate, and Von Frey tests. Additionally, the study investigated the modulation of various pain signaling pathways using a pharmacological approach. The results demonstrated that all doses of the HEXA extract significantly increased latency in the hot plate test, decreased the number of abdominal contortions, reduced hyperalgesia in the Von Frey test, and inhibited both phases of the formalin test. Caffeic acid reduced licking time in the first phase of the formalin test at all doses, with the highest dose showing significant effects in the second phase. The HEXA extract potentially modulated α2-adrenergic, nitric oxide, glutamatergic, vanilloid, cyclic guanosine monophosphate, and K+-ATP channel-dependent pathways. Conversely, caffeic acid influenced the opioid, glutamatergic, and vanilloid pathways while inhibiting nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate. HEXA and CA exhibit significant antinociceptive effects due to their potential interference in multiple pain signaling pathways. While the molecular targets remain to be fully investigated, HEXA and CA demonstrate significant potential for the development of new analgesic drugs.
... The therapeutic mechanisms of drugs in pain management are numerous and may involve activating the descending noradrenergic inhibitory system (e.g., antidepressants and opioids), modulation of voltage-gated N-type calcium ion channels (e.g., gabapentinoids), and blockade of signaling pathways between glial cells (e.g., cannabinoids) [154,155]. Treatments that combine pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions that apply these mechanisms are strongly supported by pain management guidelines [156]. Considering there are only a few categories of medications for which clinical studies have been conducted for microglia and astrocytes, the following summary will concentrate on preclinical studies, while the discussion of clinical trial progress will primarily focus on pharmaceuticals suggested in pain guidelines. ...
Article
Full-text available
Neuropathic pain is a prevalent and debilitating condition experienced by the majority of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). The complex pathophysiology of neuropathic pain, involving continuous activation of microglia and astrocytes, reactive gliosis, and altered neuronal plasticity, poses significant challenges for effective treatment. This review focuses on the pivotal roles of microglia and astrocytes, the two major glial cell types in the central nervous system, in the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain after SCI. We highlight the extensive bidirectional interactions between these cells, mediated by the release of inflammatory mediators, neurotransmitters, and neurotrophic factors, which contribute to the amplification of pain signaling. Understanding the microglia-astrocyte crosstalk and its impact on neuronal function is crucial for developing novel therapeutic strategies targeting neuropathic pain. In addition, this review discusses the fundamental biology, post-injury pain roles, and therapeutic prospects of microglia and astrocytes in neuropathic pain after SCI and elucidates the specific signaling pathways involved. We also speculated that the extracellular matrix (ECM) can affect the glial cells as well. Furthermore, we also mentioned potential targeted therapies, challenges, and progress in clinical trials, as well as new biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Finally, other relevant cell interactions in neuropathic pain and the role of glial cells in other neuropathic pain conditions have been discussed. This review serves as a comprehensive resource for further investigations into the microglia-astrocyte interaction and the detailed mechanisms of neuropathic pain after SCI, with the aim of improving therapeutic efficacy.
... However, the persistence of postinfection joint symptoms, as well as the appearance of additional manifestations, lead to a daily pain sensation, resulting in the onset of depression in chronic individuals. Interestingly, a significant number of patients reported the use of amitriptyline and pregabalin (Table S1), which are among the first-line recommended drugs for neuropathic pain in addition to being used for depressive disorders [77,78]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The chikungunya virus (CHIKV), transmitted by infected Aedes mosquitoes, has caused a significant number of infections worldwide. In Brazil, the emergence of the CHIKV-ECSA genotype in 2014 posed a major public health challenge due to its association with more severe symptoms. Objectives/Methods: This study aimed to shed new light on the host immune response by examining the whole-blood transcriptomic profile of both CHIKV-acute and chronically infected individuals from Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil, a region heavily affected by CHIKV, Dengue, and Zika virus epidemics. Results: Our data reveal complex symptomatology characterized by arthralgia and post-chikungunya neuropathy in individuals with chronic sequelae, particularly affecting women living in socially vulnerable situations. Analysis of gene modules suggests heightened metabolic processes, represented by an increase in NADH, COX5A, COA3, CYC1, and cap methylation in patients with acute disease. In contrast, individuals with chronic manifestations exhibit a distinct pattern of histone methylation, probably mediated by NCOA3 in the coactivation of different nuclear receptors, KMT2 genes, KDM3B and TET2, and with alterations in the immunological response, majorly led by IL-17RA, IL-6R, and STAT3 Th17 genes. Conclusion: Our results emphasize the complexity of CHIKV disease progression, demonstrating the heterogeneous gene expression and symptomatologic scenario across both acute and chronic phases. Moreover, the identification of specific gene modules associated with viral pathogenesis provides critical insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying these distinct clinical manifestations.
... As an antidepressant and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, duloxetine modulates neurotransmitter levels in the central nervous system and attenuates pain-signaling pathways. This neurobiological mechanism, coupled with the demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials, elucidates why the duloxetine group exhibited superior outcomes in terms of pain reduction and quality of life improvement (28,29). ...
Article
Peripheral neuropathic pain is common in patients with peripheral nerve injury and can significantly impact both their function and quality of life. There is a wide variety of non‐interventional treatment approaches, including pharmacologic therapy, physical/occupational therapy, modalities (therapeutic, mechanical, thermal, etc.), psychology, and lifestyle modification. First line pharmacologic therapy for peripheral neuropathic pain includes gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, and serotonin‐norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Other classes of medications, such as topical treatments, opioids, and cannabinoids, have more limited usefulness in treatment but remain part of a treatment regimen. Physical and occupational therapy, psychological interventions, and lifestyle medicine are important adjuncts in the treatment and prevention of future peripheral neuropathic pain. The strength of the evidence supporting each intervention varies, with that for pharmacologic intervention being the strongest. A combination of these options tailored to the individual needs of the patient likely will result in the best treatment outcome for peripheral neuropathic pain.
Article
BACKGROUND: Arginine vasopressin has been implicated in the modulation of stress and pain. The influence of a synthetic analogue of arginine vasopressin, 1-deamino-8-D-arginine-vasopressin, оn pain sensitivity, stress reactivity, levels of monoamines and brain neurotrophic factor in a model of paw electrical stimulation in rats has not been studied. AIM: The aim was to evaluate the effect of a synthetic vasopressin analog, 1-deamino-8-D-arginine-vasopressin, on pain sensitivity and the content of norepinephrine, serotonin, dopamine, brain neurotrophic factor in the parietal cortex and spinal cord in electrocutaneous paw stimulation test in rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on male Wistar rats who were injected with 1-deamino-8-D-arginine-vasopressin intranasally once a day for 5 days in small (single 20 ng, course 100 ng) and large doses (single 2 ug, course 10 ug). The content of brain neurotrophic factor in the parietal cortex and spinal cord, and corticosterone in blood serum were determined using enzyme immunoassay. The levels of norepinephrine, serotonin, dopamine and their metabolites in the brain were evaluated using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: 1-Deamino-8-D-arginine-vasopressin in different doses reduced pain sensitivity in rats, more pronounced when administered in large doses. The peptide in small doses in the parietal cortex increased the content of dopamine and reduced the levels of 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid, a metabolite of serotonin; in the spinal cord, it reduced the content of 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid. 1-Deamino-8-D-arginine-vasopressin in high doses in the parietal cortex increased the content of dopamine and reduced the levels of 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid; in the spinal cord ― reduced the content of serotonin and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, a metabolite of dopamine; increased the levels of norepinephrine and homovanilic acid, a metabolite of dopamine. The peptide had no effect on corticosterone levels in the blood and brain neurotrophic factor levels in the brain in rats. CONCLUSIONS: The analgesic effects of 1-deamino-8-D-arginine-vasopressin were revealed with intranasal administration in different subendocrine doses. Regardless of the administered doses, dopamine and serotonin at the supraspinal level were involved in peptide-induced anesthesia; serotonin at the spinal cord level. More pronounced analgesia with the administration of 1-deamino-8-D-arginine-vasopressin in high doses was due to the additional involvement of dopamine and norepinephrine at the spinal cord level.
Article
Objective To perform a secondary review of low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPG) identified in a recently conducted systematic review and to synthesize and summarize low‐value recommendations as practices that may be candidates for deimplementation. Literature Survey LBP (subacute or chronic) CPGs in English (symptom based, created by a governmental or professional society, published between January 1990 and May 2020) were previously identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Ortho Guidelines, CPG Infobase, Emergency Care Research Institute, Guidelines International Network, National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, and Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network. Methodology Twenty‐one CPGs were reviewed from a systematic review (previously published). Full‐text review of all 21 CPGs was conducted, and three recommendation categories indicative of low value (recommend strongly against, recommend weakly against, inconclusive/insufficient evidence) were identified using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) language and approach. Synthesis One hundred thirty‐five low‐value recommendations were identified and classified under eight intervention categories: orthotics/support, traction, physical modalities, pharmacological interventions, injections, surgery, bed rest, and miscellaneous. Traction, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), therapeutic ultrasound (TUS), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) had the most CPGs recommend strongly against their usage. Opioids were recommended strongly against by four CPGs. No significant difference ( p > .05) was found between CPG quality and a specific deimplementation recommendation or between CPG quality and the number of strongly against, weakly against, and inconclusive/insufficient evidence recommendations. Conclusions Clinicians managing patients with chronic LBP should consider deimplementing these low‐value interventions (traction, TENS, TUS, and SSRI).
Article
Full-text available
Background Chronic pain is common and costly. Antidepressants are prescribed to reduce pain. However, there has not been a network meta-analysis examining all antidepressants across all chronic pain conditions, so effectiveness and safety for most antidepressants for pain conditions remain unknown. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for chronic pain (except headache) in adults. Our primary outcomes were as follows: substantial pain relief (50%), pain intensity, mood and adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were as follows: moderate pain relief (30%), physical function, sleep, quality of life, Patient Global Impression of Change, serious adverse events and withdrawal. Design This was a systematic review with a network meta-analysis. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, AMED and PsycINFO databases for randomised controlled trials of antidepressants for chronic pain conditions up until 4 January 2022. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020171855), and the protocol was published in the Cochrane Library (https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014682). Setting We analysed trials from all settings. Participants We included trials in which participants had chronic pain, defined as longer than 3 months, from any condition excluding headache. Interventions We included all antidepressants. Main outcome measures Our primary outcome was substantial pain relief, defined as a reduction ˃ 50%. We also measured pain intensity, mood and adverse events. Secondary measures included moderate pain relief (above 30% reduction), physical function, sleep, quality of life, Global Impression of Change, serious adverse events, and withdrawal from trial. Results We identified 176 studies with a total of 28,664 participants. Most studies were placebo-controlled ( n = 83) and parallel armed ( n = 141). The most common pain conditions examined were fibromyalgia (59 studies), neuropathic pain (49 studies) and musculoskeletal pain (40 studies). The average length of randomised controlled trials was 10 weeks. Most studies measured short-term outcomes only and excluded people with low mood and other mental health conditions. Across efficacy outcomes, duloxetine was consistently the highest-ranked antidepressant with moderate- to high-certainty evidence. Standard dose was equally efficacious as high dose for the majority of outcomes. Milnacipran was often ranked as the next most efficacious antidepressant, although the certainty of evidence was lower than that for duloxetine. There was insufficient evidence to draw robust conclusions for the efficacy and safety of any other antidepressant for chronic pain. Limitations The evidence for antidepressants other than duloxetine is poor. For duloxetine, it is not clear whether the effect applies to groups with both pain and low mood, since these groups were excluded from trials. There is also insufficient evidence on long-term outcomes and on adverse effects. Conclusions There is only reliable evidence for duloxetine in the treatment of chronic pain. Duloxetine was moderately efficacious across all outcomes at standard dose. There is also promising evidence for milnacipran, although further high-quality research is needed to be confident in these conclusions. Data for all other antidepressants were of low certainty. However, the findings should not be read as an encouragement to prescribe antidepressants where other non-pharmacological intervention could be equally effective, especially in the absence of good evidence on side effects and safety. Future work There is a need for large, methodologically sound trials testing the effectiveness of antidepressants for chronic pain. These trials should examine long-term outcomes (> 6 months) and include people with low mood. There should also be better reporting of adverse events, tolerance of drugs, and long-term compliance. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020171855. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128782) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment ; Vol. 28, No. 62. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Article
Background Phantom limb pain (PLP) refers to the painful sensory perception of a missing limb after amputation, which can have physical and psychological impacts. Aim To determine the effectiveness of duloxetine for pain management in PLP by the reduction of opioid doses and other neuropathic analgesics when introduced into multimodal pain management strategies in the subacute rehabilitation setting. Method This was a retrospective observational case‐matched cohort study of patients who were admitted to a geriatric and rehabilitation unit at a tertiary Australian hospital from January 2005–December 2017 with PLP after lower‐limb amputation. Patients were included if they had a new amputation and experienced PLP. The primary outcome was a difference in oxycodone dose equivalents at discharge between the two cohorts. Univariable analysis was used to compare groups. Ethical approval was granted by the Metro South Low Negligible Risk Ethics Committee (Reference no: LNR/2018/QMS/47370) and the study conforms with the National statement on ethical conduct in human research . Results Thirty patients from the duloxetine treatment cohort and 57 patients from the non‐duloxetine cohort were identified. Participants were predominantly male (81%) and had a median age of 63 years (interquartile range = 10.7). Both populations showed a similar rate of opioid dose reduction comparing doses at admission with those at discharge. There were no significant differences in absolute oxycodone equivalent doses at the two observed check points: admission and discharge. Conclusion This study demonstrated that opioid consumption in post‐surgical lower‐limb amputees reporting PLP was not significantly different between populations that used and did not use duloxetine. Future research should evaluate the efficacy of duloxetine in PLP pain management using a multisite prospective study design.
Article
Full-text available
Norepinephrine released by the locus coeruleus modulates cellular processes and synaptic transmission in the central nervous system through its actions at a number of pre- and postsynaptic receptors. This transmitter system facilitates sensory signal detection and promotes waking and arousal, processes which are necessary for navigating a complex and dynamic sensory environment. In addition to its effects on sensory processing and waking behavior, norepinephrine is now recognized as a contributor to various aspects of cognition, including attention, behavioral flexibility, working memory, and long-term mnemonic processes. Two areas of dense noradrenergic innervation, the prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus, are particularly important with regard to these functions. Due to its role in mediating normal cognitive function, it is reasonable to expect that noradrenergic transmission becomes dysfunctional in a number of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases characterized by cognitive deficits. In this review, we summarize the unique role that norepinephrine plays in prefrontal cortical and hippocampal function and how its interaction with its various receptors contributes to cognitive behaviors. We further assess the changes that occur in the noradrenergic system in Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and schizophrenia and how these changes contribute to cognitive decline in these pathologies.
Article
Full-text available
It is known that some antidepressants and antipsychotics directly inhibit NMDA-type ionotropic glutamate receptors. In this study we systematically studied action of seven drugs (Fluoxetine, Citalopram, Desipramine, Amitriptyline, Atomoxetine, Chlorpromazine, and Clozapine) on NMDA receptors and Ca²⁺-permeable and -impermeable AMPA receptors in rat brain neurons by whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Except for weak effect of fluoxetine, all drugs were virtually inactive against Ca²⁺-impermeable AMPA receptors. Fluoxetine and desipramine significantly inhibited Ca²⁺-permeable AMPA receptors (IC50 = 43±7 and 105±12 µM, respectively). Desipramine, atomoxetine and chlorpromazine inhibited NMDA receptors in clinically relevant low micromolar concentrations, while citalopram had only weak effect. All tested medicines have been clustered into two groups by their action on NMDA receptors: desipramine, amiptriptyline, chlorpromazine, and atomoxetine display voltage- and magnesium-dependent open channel blocking mechanism. Action of fluoxetine and clozapine was found to be voltage- and magnesium-independent. All voltage-dependent compounds could be trapped in closed NMDA receptor channels. Possible contribution of NMDA receptor inhibition by certain antidepressants and antipsychotics to their analgesic effects in neuropathic pain is discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Background Exercise alleviates pain and it is a central component of treatment strategy for chronic pain in clinical setting. However, little is known about mechanism of this exercise-induced hypoalgesia. The mesolimbic dopaminergic network plays a role in positive emotions to rewards including motivation and pleasure. Pain negatively modulates these emotions, but appropriate exercise is considered to activate the dopaminergic network. We investigated possible involvement of this network as a mechanism of exercise-induced hypoalgesia. Methods In the present study, we developed a protocol of treadmill exercise, which was able to recover pain threshold under partial sciatic nerve ligation in mice, and investigated involvement of the dopaminergic reward network in exercise-induced hypoalgesia. To temporally suppress a neural activation during exercise, a genetically modified inhibitory G-protein-coupled receptor, hM4Di, was specifically expressed on dopaminergic pathway from the ventral tegmental area to the nucleus accumbens. Results The chemogenetic-specific neural suppression by Gi-DREADD system dramatically offset the effect of exercise-induced hypoalgesia in transgenic mice with hM4Di expressed on the ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons. Additionally, anti-exercise-induced hypoalgesia effect was significantly observed under the suppression of neurons projecting out of the ventral tegmental area to the nucleus accumbens as well. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the dopaminergic pathway from the ventral tegmental area to the nucleus accumbens is involved in the anti-nociception under low-intensity exercise under a neuropathic pain-like state.
Article
Background: The tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline, the serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor duloxetine, and gabapentinoids are first-line drugs for treatment of neuropathic pain. The analgesic effect of these drugs relates to brainstem-spinal descending noradrenergic systems. However, amitriptyline utilizes a variety of mechanisms for analgesia in neuropathic pain, and it is unclear which mechanism is most important. In the present study, we investigated the role of descending noradrenergic systems in the analgesic effect of these drugs for treatment of neuropathic pain. We also examined whether amitriptyline modifies the descending noradrenergic systems. Methods: Seven days after L5 spinal nerve ligation (SNL), rats received N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine (DSP-4, 50 mg/kg) to degenerate noradrenergic fibers. The rats then received 5 daily intraperitoneal injections of amitriptyline (10 mg/kg), duloxetine (10 mg/kg), pregabalin (10 mg/kg), or gabapentin (50 mg/kg) from 21 days after SNL surgery. Paw withdrawal thresholds were determined to assess the effect of the drugs on hyperalgesia after SNL. To determine whether 5 daily injections of amitriptyline activated noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus (LC) and spinal cord with or without DSP-4 treatment, we performed immunohistochemistry using antibodies for c-Fos and dopamine beta-hydroxylase (DβH). Results: Five daily injections of amitriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin, and gabapentin exerted antihyperalgesic effects in SNL rats (P < .001; estimated treatment effect of amitriptyline [99% confidence interval]: 59.9 [35.1-84.7] g). The antihyperalgesic effects of duloxetine, pregabalin, and gabapentin were reversed by pretreatment with DSP-4 (P < .001, respectively). However, antihyperalgesia was still observed after treatment of amitriptyline in SNL rats with DSP-4 pretreatment (P < .001, 59.7 [30.0-89.3] g), and this analgesic effect was not reversed by the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan (30 μg). Additionally, 5 daily injections of amitriptyline increased the ratio of c-Fos-immunoreactive (IR) cells in noradrenergic LC neurons in SNL rats with or without DSP-4 pretreatment (P < .001, respectively). Five daily injections of amitriptyline increased DβH-IR in the LC and the spinal dorsal horn of SNL rats (P < .001, respectively). With DSP-4 pretreatment, DβH-IR was dramatically decreased with or without 5 daily injections of amitriptyline (P < .001). Conclusions: Five daily injections of amitriptyline produced antihyperalgesic effects against neuropathic pain despite suppression of noradrenergic descending inhibitory systems. Amitriptyline activated LC neurons and increased noradrenergic fibers density in SNL rats. These results suggest that amitriptyline could still produce analgesia under pathological dysfunction of the descending noradrenergic system. Amitriptyline may enhance the analgesic effect of drugs for neuropathic pain that require normal descending noradrenergic inhibition to produce analgesia, such as serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors and gabapentinoids.
Article
Background: Antidepressants are used to treat neuropathic pain and although the detailed mechanisms of their effects are unclear, the descending noradrenergic inhibitory system might play an important role. We tested our hypothesis that repeated administration of duloxetine suppresses neuropathic pain by restoring the descending noradrenergic inhibitory system in rats 6 weeks after spinal nerve ligation (SNL). Methods: We subcutaneously injected SNL rats with duloxetine (10 mg kg day) daily for 3 consecutive days and assessed behavioral hypersensitivity and noxious stimulus-induced analgesia (NSIA) activated by subcutaneous injection of capsaicin. We also performed microdialysis studies of the spinal cord, noradrenaline measurements of homogenized lumbar spinal tissue, and immunohistochemistry of the locus coeruleus. Results: Three daily injections of duloxetine attenuated the mechanical hyperalgesia induced by SNL (SNL treated with vehicle: 88 ± 9.4 g versus SNL treated with duloxetine: 148 ± 13 g, P< .001; estimated treatment effect of duloxetine [95% confidence interval {CI}], 65 [50.6-79.4]; n = 6/group, on day 4) and recovered the decreased NSIA (vehicle: 154 ± 10 g versus duloxetine: 213 ± 33 g, P < .001; 71.3 [57.4-85.2]; n = 6/group, 30 minutes after injection). The noradrenaline content in the dorsal spinal cord increased bilaterally (SNL treated with vehicle: 946.7 ± 203.6 pg/g versus SNL treated with duloxetine: 1593.5 ± 181.4 pg/g, P#x003C;.001; 646.79 pg/g [481.61-811.97] on the ipsilateral side; SNL treated with vehicle: 845.0 ± 164.7 pg/g versus SNL treated with vehicle: 1557.2 ± 237.4 pg/g, P < .001; 712.17 pg/g [449.31-975.02] on the contralateral side). Intrathecal injection (IT) of the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan reversed both the antihyperalgesic effect (before IT: 133 ± 5.7 g versus 30 minutes after IT: 85.8 ± 6.5 g, P < .001, -47 [-39.1 to -54.8], n = 6/group, and NSIA; vehicle-IT: 219 ± 7.4 g versus idazoxan-IT: 153 ± 10 g, P < .001; -65.8 g [-25.2 to -77.4] n = 6/group, 30 minutes after forepaw injection of capsaicin). Duloxetine treatment did not alter the noradrenaline release in the spinal cord after capsaicin injection (P = .415), or the fraction of nuclei positive for phosphorylated cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein in the locus coeruleus (P = 1.00 duloxetine versus vehicle 120 minutes after forepaw injection of vehicle and P = 1.00 duloxetine versus vehicle 120 minutes after forepaw injection of capsaicin). Conclusions: These findings suggest that 3 daily injections of duloxetine suppressed hyperalgesia and recovered impaired NSIA in rats 6 weeks after nerve injury. Both effects of duloxetine were reversed by IT of an α2-adrenoceptor antagonist. These findings suggest the inhibitory effects of duloxetine against neuropathic pain depend on recovery of the noradrenergic descending inhibitory system, especially in the spinal cord.
Article
Antidepressants remain one of the first line treatments prescribed to neuropathic pain patients despite their limited efficacy and/or their numerous side effects. More and more, pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain has evolved towards the use of therapeutic combinations. The goal of the present study was to assess the efficacy of the combination of antidepressants - selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors-with a peptide (TAT-2ASCV) able to disrupt the interaction between serotonin type 2A (5-HT2A) receptors and associated PDZ proteins. Mechanical hypersensitivity was assessed in sciatic nerve ligation-induced neuropathic pain in rats using paw pressure test after acute treatment with TAT-2ASCV alone or in combination with repeated treatment with fluoxetine or duloxetine or clomipramine. First, we validated the anti-hyperalgesic effect of TAT-2ASCV on mechanical hypersensitivity at the dose of 100 ng/rat (single i.t. injection). Second, using selective receptor antagonists, we found that the effect of TAT-2ASCV on mechanical hypersensitivity involves 5-HT2A as well as GABAA receptors. Finally, we showed that the association of TAT-2ASCV (100 ng, single i.t. injection) with fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, five i.p. injections) reveals its anti-hyperalgesic effect, while the association with duloxetine (1 mg/kg, five i.p. injections) or clomipramine (2.5 mg/kg, five i.p. injections) is only additive. Those results further accentuate the interest to develop small molecules acting like TAT-2ASCV in order to treat neuropathic pain as a monotherapy or in combination with antidepressants.
Article
Background and purpose: NLX-112 (a.k.a. befiradol, F13640) is a drug candidate intended for the treatment of l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. It is a highly selective serotonin 5-HT1A receptor full agonist which has been previously tested in a variety of models of CNS effects including analgesic activity in rat. Its activity in mouse models of pain has not been previously investigated. Experimental approach: The activity of NLX-112 was tested in mouse models of acute pain (hot plate), tonic pain (intraplantar formalin test), in the oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain model of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and in the streptozotocin (STZ)-induced model of painful diabetic neuropathy. Key results: The main findings indicate that (i) NLX-112 was markedly active in the formalin test with potent reduction of paw licking in both phases of the test (minimal effective dose (MED) 0.5 mg/kg i.p. and p.o. in acute phase, and 0.1 mg/kg i.p. and 1 mg/kg p.o. in late phase). The effects of NLX-112 in this test were completely abolished by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY100635; (ii) NLX-112 was active in the hot plate test and in the oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain model of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, but at markedly higher doses (MED 2.5 mg/kg i.p.); (iii) NLX-112 was least active in the STZ-induced model of painful diabetic neuropathy (MED 5 mg/kg i.p.); (iv) NLX-112 did not affect locomotor activity. Conclusions and implications: NLX-112 may have significant potential for treatment of tonic pain but may be less promising as a candidate for treatment of chemotherapy-induced or diabetic neuropathic pain.
Article
Antidepressants such as tricyclic antidepressants, and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors are a first-line treatment for neuropathic pain. Here, we aimed to determine the involvement of the spinal dopaminergic system in the antihyperalgesic effects of antidepressants in a rat model of neuropathic pain induced by spinal nerve ligation (SNL). The right L5 spinal nerve of male Sprague-Dawley rats was ligated under inhalation anesthesia to induce hyperalgesia. Behavioral testing was performed by measuring ipsilateral hindpaw withdrawal thresholds after intraperitoneal injection of amitriptyline, duloxetine, milnacipran, and fluoxetine. D2-like receptors were blocked by intrathecal administration of sulpiride. We also determined the concentrations of dopamine in the spinal cord using microdialysis after injection of antidepressants. The dopamine contents in the spinal dorsal horn were also measured in normal and SNL rats at 2, 3, 4, and 8 weeks after SNL surgery. Intraperitoneal injection of amitriptyline, duloxetine, milnacipran, and fluoxetine (3–30 mg/kg) produced antihyperalgesic effects, and prevented by intrathecal pre-injection of sulpiride (30 μg). Microdialysis revealed the dopamine levels in the spinal cord were increased after intraperitoneal injection of each antidepressant (10 mg/kg). Furthermore, the dopamine content in homogenized spinal cord tissue were increased at 2 weeks after SNL and then subsequently declined. Our results suggest that the effect of antidepressants against neuropathic pain is related to modulation of not only noradrenalin and serotonin but also dopamine levels in the spinal cord.
Article
The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is activated in both acute and chronic pain. In this Review, we discuss increasing evidence from rodent studies that ACC activation contributes to chronic pain states and describe several forms of synaptic plasticity that may underlie this effect. In particular, one form of long-term potentiation (LTP) in the ACC, which is triggered by the activation of NMDA receptors and expressed by an increase in AMPA-receptor function, sustains the affective component of the pain state. Another form of LTP in the ACC, which is triggered by the activation of kainate receptors and expressed by an increase in glutamate release, may contribute to pain-related anxiety.
Article
Background: Noxious stimulus-induced analgesia (NSIA) is a type of conditioned pain modulation in rats that has been used to assess endogenous pain control systems. The descending noradrenergic system is involved in NSIA, and nerve injury induces plastic changes of descending noradrenergic neurons. Thus, we hypothesized that nerve injury would affect NSIA strength and that amitriptyline and pregabalin, which often are used for treating neuropathic pain, might further modulate NSIA through effects on the descending noradrenergic system. Methods: We examined the change in NSIA over time after right L5 spinal nerve ligation (SNL) in rats by measuring the contralateral hind paw withdrawal threshold after left forepaw capsaicin injection. In addition, we examined NSIA after 5 daily intraperitoneal injection of amitriptyline or pregabalin. Microdialysis studies were performed to measure noradrenaline levels after left forepaw capsaicin injection in the left spinal dorsal horn in noninjured rats, SNL rats, and SNL rats that had received 5 daily intraperitoneal injections of amitriptyline or pregabalin. Results: NSIA was dramatically attenuated 5 and 6 weeks after SNL (P < 0.001). The noradrenaline level in the lumbar spinal cord was significantly increased in noninjured rats receiving forepaw injection of capsaicin compared with vehicle injection (P < 0.001), but not in rats 6 weeks after SNL surgery. Five daily intraperitoneal injections of amitriptyline (10 mg/kg/d) or pregabalin (10 mg/kg/d) at 5 weeks after SNL gradually increased the ipsilateral hindpaw withdrawal threshold (P < 0.001). At 6 weeks after SNL, amitriptyline, but not pregabalin, reversed the attenuation of NSIA by SNL (P < 0.001) and increased the spinal noradrenaline level after forepaw injection of capsaicin (P = 0.005). Conclusions: These data suggest that endogenous analgesia in neuropathic pain states is strongly decreased from a certain time after nerve injury and that amitriptyline reverses the attenuation of endogenous analgesia through effects on the descending noradrenergic system.