A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Current Gastroenterology Reports
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
NUTRITION AND OBESITY (S MCCLAVE AND J OBERT, SECTION EDITORS)
The Association Between Artificial Sweeteners and Obesity
Michelle Pearlman
1
&Jon Obert
2
&Lisa Casey
1
Published online: 21 November 2017
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017
Abstract
Purpose of Review The purpose of this paper is to review the
epidemiology of obesity and the evolution of artificial sweet-
eners; to examine the latest research on the effects of artificial
sweeteners on the host microbiome, the gut-brain axis, glu-
cose homeostasis, and energy consumption; and to discuss
how all of these changes ultimately contribute to obesity.
Recent Findings Although artificial sweeteners were devel-
oped as a sugar substitute to help reduce insulin resistance
and obesity, data in both animal models and humans suggest
that the effects of artificial sweeteners may contribute to met-
abolic syndrome and the obesity epidemic. Artificial sweet-
eners appear to change the host microbiome, lead to decreased
satiety, and alter glucose homeostasis, and are associated with
increased caloric consumption and weight gain.
Summary Artificial sweeteners are marketed as a healthy al-
ternative to sugar and as a tool for weight loss. Data however
suggests that the intended effects do not correlate with what is
seen in clinical practice. Future research should focus on the
newer plant-based sweeteners, incorporate extended study du-
rations to determine the long-term effects of artificial sweet-
ener consumption, and focus on changes in the microbiome,
as that seems to be one of the main driving forces behind
nutrient absorption and glucose metabolism.
Keywords Obesity .Artificial sweeteners .Microbiome .
Insulinresistance .Metabolic syndrome .Calorieconsumption
Introduction
Epidemiology of Obesity
Obesity is a major public health problem that exhibits no
boundaries. It affects children and adults, and spans all ethnic-
ities and races. In the USA between 1980 and 2000, the over-
all prevalence of obesity increased significantly among adult
men and women. For unclear reasons, thoughthe overall prev-
alence has remained stable since 2000, there seems to be an
increasing trend toward obesity in women and the extreme
obesity class [1]. Studies suggest that obesity is far more com-
plex than previously thought and is a result of numerous in-
ternal host factors and external environmental factors. Several
factors that contribute to obesity include but are not limited to
the consumption of energy dense foods, large portion sizes,
physical inactivity, alterations in the host gut microbiome,
consumption of a predominantly high fat and/or high sugar
diet, and the use of artificial sweeteners (AS) [2–5].
The Evolution of Artificial Sweeteners
Sugar-laden diets are ubiquitous because humans and animals
display preferences for sweet taste that starts early in life [6,
7]. The use of AS, also known as non-caloric or non-nutritive
sweeteners (NNS), has grown in popularity as awareness of
the obesity epidemic increases, and in particular due to the
growing concern for obesity-related complications including
metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance [8,9]. Based on the
NHANES database, the prevalence of AS from 1999 to 2007
increased from 6.1 to 12.5% among children and 18.7% to
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Nutrition and Obesity
*Michelle Pearlman
pearlmanmi@gmail.com
1
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and
Hepatology, University ofTexas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323
Harry Hines, K5.136, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
2
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of
Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
Curr Gastroenterol Rep (2017) 19: 64
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-017-0602-9
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.