ArticlePublisher preview availableLiterature Review

The Association Between Artificial Sweeteners and Obesity

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this paper is to review the epidemiology of obesity and the evolution of artificial sweeteners; to examine the latest research on the effects of artificial sweeteners on the host microbiome, the gut-brain axis, glucose homeostasis, and energy consumption; and to discuss how all of these changes ultimately contribute to obesity. Recent findings: Although artificial sweeteners were developed as a sugar substitute to help reduce insulin resistance and obesity, data in both animal models and humans suggest that the effects of artificial sweeteners may contribute to metabolic syndrome and the obesity epidemic. Artificial sweeteners appear to change the host microbiome, lead to decreased satiety, and alter glucose homeostasis, and are associated with increased caloric consumption and weight gain. Artificial sweeteners are marketed as a healthy alternative to sugar and as a tool for weight loss. Data however suggests that the intended effects do not correlate with what is seen in clinical practice. Future research should focus on the newer plant-based sweeteners, incorporate extended study durations to determine the long-term effects of artificial sweetener consumption, and focus on changes in the microbiome, as that seems to be one of the main driving forces behind nutrient absorption and glucose metabolism.
NUTRITION AND OBESITY (S MCCLAVE AND J OBERT, SECTION EDITORS)
The Association Between Artificial Sweeteners and Obesity
Michelle Pearlman
1
&Jon Obert
2
&Lisa Casey
1
Published online: 21 November 2017
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017
Abstract
Purpose of Review The purpose of this paper is to review the
epidemiology of obesity and the evolution of artificial sweet-
eners; to examine the latest research on the effects of artificial
sweeteners on the host microbiome, the gut-brain axis, glu-
cose homeostasis, and energy consumption; and to discuss
how all of these changes ultimately contribute to obesity.
Recent Findings Although artificial sweeteners were devel-
oped as a sugar substitute to help reduce insulin resistance
and obesity, data in both animal models and humans suggest
that the effects of artificial sweeteners may contribute to met-
abolic syndrome and the obesity epidemic. Artificial sweet-
eners appear to change the host microbiome, lead to decreased
satiety, and alter glucose homeostasis, and are associated with
increased caloric consumption and weight gain.
Summary Artificial sweeteners are marketed as a healthy al-
ternative to sugar and as a tool for weight loss. Data however
suggests that the intended effects do not correlate with what is
seen in clinical practice. Future research should focus on the
newer plant-based sweeteners, incorporate extended study du-
rations to determine the long-term effects of artificial sweet-
ener consumption, and focus on changes in the microbiome,
as that seems to be one of the main driving forces behind
nutrient absorption and glucose metabolism.
Keywords Obesity .Artificial sweeteners .Microbiome .
Insulinresistance .Metabolic syndrome .Calorieconsumption
Introduction
Epidemiology of Obesity
Obesity is a major public health problem that exhibits no
boundaries. It affects children and adults, and spans all ethnic-
ities and races. In the USA between 1980 and 2000, the over-
all prevalence of obesity increased significantly among adult
men and women. For unclear reasons, thoughthe overall prev-
alence has remained stable since 2000, there seems to be an
increasing trend toward obesity in women and the extreme
obesity class [1]. Studies suggest that obesity is far more com-
plex than previously thought and is a result of numerous in-
ternal host factors and external environmental factors. Several
factors that contribute to obesity include but are not limited to
the consumption of energy dense foods, large portion sizes,
physical inactivity, alterations in the host gut microbiome,
consumption of a predominantly high fat and/or high sugar
diet, and the use of artificial sweeteners (AS) [25].
The Evolution of Artificial Sweeteners
Sugar-laden diets are ubiquitous because humans and animals
display preferences for sweet taste that starts early in life [6,
7]. The use of AS, also known as non-caloric or non-nutritive
sweeteners (NNS), has grown in popularity as awareness of
the obesity epidemic increases, and in particular due to the
growing concern for obesity-related complications including
metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance [8,9]. Based on the
NHANES database, the prevalence of AS from 1999 to 2007
increased from 6.1 to 12.5% among children and 18.7% to
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Nutrition and Obesity
*Michelle Pearlman
pearlmanmi@gmail.com
1
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and
Hepatology, University ofTexas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323
Harry Hines, K5.136, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
2
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of
Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
Curr Gastroenterol Rep (2017) 19: 64
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-017-0602-9
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... In both humans and rodents, the majority of this bacteria is found in the colon, where Bacteroidetes and firmicutes are the predominant groups. 27 Earlier research indicates that obese rodents tend to have fewer Bacteroidetes and higher levels of firmicutes when correlated with their lean counterparts. 28 A study proposes that variations in the human microbiome may render certain individuals more susceptible to glucose intolerance following exposure to AS than others. ...
... Further, artificially sweetened beverages have been shown in human studies to induce glucose intolerance through alterations in gut microbiota composition and function. 45 Nonetheless, since the evidence regarding the effect of artificial sweetener use on weight management and glycemic control was highly mixed, 46,47 reverse causation remains an alternative explanation if participants with underlying metabolic conditions preferentially added artificial sweeteners to coffee due to health concerns. Additional longitudinal studies and clinical trials F I G U R E 2 Associations between overall coffee consumption, as well as stratified by coffee types, and metabolic syndrome, high fasting glucose, high triglycerides, central obesity, high blood pressure, and low HDL-cholesterol. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background This study investigates the associations between coffee consumption and metabolic syndrome and its components, as well as the effect of milk, sugar, and artificial sweeteners on these associations. Methods A cross‐sectional analysis was conducted with 351805 UK Biobank participants. Coffee consumption data were collected via food frequency questionnaires and 24‐h recall. Metabolic syndrome was identified through blood biochemistry and self‐reported medication use. Odds ratios were calculated using multivariable logistic regression, and results were verified with two‐sample Mendelian randomization. Results Consuming up to two cups of coffee per day was inversely associated with metabolic syndrome (1 cup/day: odds ratio [OR]: 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85–0.92; 2 cups/day: OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86–0.93). Higher intakes showed near‐null associations. Mendelian randomization did not support a causal link between coffee intake and metabolic syndrome. Both self‐reported and genetically predicted high coffee consumption (four cups per day or more) were associated with central obesity. The inverse association between coffee consumption and metabolic syndrome was more profound among drinkers of ground coffee than those of instant coffee. Results were similar when stratified by the use of milk and sugar, yet the use of artificial sweetener with coffee was positively associated with metabolic syndrome and all component conditions. Conclusions Coffee consumption may increase the risk of central obesity but is unlikely to impact the risk of metabolic syndrome. The potential health effects of artificial sweeteners in coffee need further investigation. image
... The consumption of a beverage that consists of artificial sweeteners like aspartame, or stevia before lunch, was discovered, despite the fact that diet drinks have less calories than beverages that contain sucrose, to cause excessive compensation during future meals, resulting in a similar daily caloric intake. Consuming artificial sweeteners like saccharin or aspartame was linked to adiposity and increased weight gain (Pearlman et al., 2017). The research discovered that adding nonnutritive artificial sweeteners led to higher body fat levels in mice, even though their food intake remained unchanged. ...
Article
Full-text available
There is a recent trend showing an uptick in the artificial sweetener's usage, particularly the nonnourishing variety. The allure of a low‐calorie choice that lets people indulge in their sweet tooths while consuming less calories overall is what motivates this. Children's food products often contain a substantial number of artificial sweeteners due to their properties that aid in moisture retention, act as fillers, and serve as bulking agents. This article provides a comprehensive overview of artificial sweeteners and influences in human wealth. Studies have linked the use of artificial sweeteners to premature birth, highlighting the teratogenic potential of these compounds, particularly in beverages. Pregnant women who incorporate nonnutritive sweeteners into their diet during pregnancy are more likely to have children with birth defects, as indicated by studies on the subject. Artificial sweeteners should not be added to food for children because studies show that eating them while a child's body is still developing might disturb the balance of gut microbiota and cause potential problems like heart disease, stroke, and cognitive decline. The ingestion of nonnourishing sweeteners has adverse effects on the fertility of both men and women. Studies indicate that exceeding the recommended daily consumption that the FDA has set for artificial sweeteners can result in conditions of infertility for both genders. Additionally, there is a connection between the onset of cancer and the use of artificial sweeteners. Presently, a considerable amount of research relies on animal models rather than human ones, creating a notable gap in research. The limitation of extensive human model studies represents a drawback in validating results. Furthermore, there is a necessity for increased research focused on advancing techniques that can minimize the adverse effects of artificial sweeteners, making them more suitable for addressing issues related to obesity and various types of diabetes.
... Animal studies have suggested that certain artificial sweeteners, such as aspartame, may be associated with inflammatory responses [56,57]. Additionally, artificial sweeteners might alter the gut microflora, increase preferences for sweet foods, regulate appetite, and induce glucose intolerance [16,54,58]. However, whether these mechanisms are related to CRDs requires further elucidation. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The associations between specific types of sugary beverages and major chronic respiratory diseases remain relatively unexplored. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the associations of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs), and natural juices (NJs) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome (ACOS). Methods: This prospective cohort study included 210,339 participants from the UK Biobank. Sugary beverage intake was measured in units (glasses/ cans/cartons/250 mL) through 24-h dietary questionnaires. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the prevalence and incidence, respectively. Quantile G-computation was used to estimate the joint associations and relative contributions of the 3 types of sugary beverages. Results: Over a median follow-up of 11.6 y, 3491 participants developed COPD, 4645 asthma, and 523 ACOS. In prevalence analysis, certain categories of SSB and NJ consumption were associated with increased asthma prevalence, while high ASB consumption (>2 units/d) was linked to higher risks of all 3 outcomes. In incidence analysis, high SSB consumption (>2 units/d) was associated with incident COPD (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19, 1.98) and asthma (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.52). Dose-response relationships were observed for ASB consumption with all 3 outcomes (continuous HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.36, 2.87, for COPD; continuous HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.24, 2.20, for asthma; and continuous HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 1.20, 6.72, for ACOS). Moderate NJ consumption (>0-1 unit/d) was inversely associated with COPD (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.97), particularly grapefruit and orange juice. Joint exposure to these beverages (per unit increase) was associated with COPD (HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.29) and asthma (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.27), with ASBs having greater positive weights than SSBs. Conclusions: Consumption of SSBs and ASBs was associated with increased risks of COPD, asthma, and potentially ACOS, whereas moderate NJ consumption was associated with reduced risk of COPD, depending on the juice type.
... Sweeteners are food additives used to give a sweet taste to food due to its low caloric value. In this way, they are valuable substances for individuals with diabetes or who follow a low-calorie diet (Fernstrom, 2015;Pearlman, Obert, & Casey, 2017). Among the types of sweeteners currently allowed by ANVISA and highly prevalent in the Brazilian market, sodium saccharin, sodium cyclamate, aspartame, and steviol glycosides stand out (ANVISA, 2023;Zanini, Araújo, & Martínez-Mesa, 2011). ...
Article
Full-text available
Sweeteners are food additives consumed worldwide, especially by individuals with restrictive diets. This study evaluated the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of sweeteners widely sold in Brazil through a bioassay with Allium cepa. Onion bulbs were exposed to different concentrations of sweeteners, and their root cells were stained with acetic carmine and analyzed under an optical microscope. Distilled water was used as a negative control, and glyphosate as a positive control. The results demonstrated that the mitotic index (MI) and the chromosome aberration index (CAI) of the three sweeteners tested did not differ significantly from the negative control, indicating that they are not toxic or mutagenic additives. This result is positive for consumers of these products, especially those who need to replace sugar due to dietary restrictions. However, they should be consumed with caution.
Chapter
Flavored milk’s main characteristic is that it is a fluid product, with the addition of a few ingredients and a simple technological process. It is a product with great market acceptance, especially for children and has great potential in incorporating new ingredients and functional components, aiming to reach new audiences. This chapter presents the main technological approaches in flavored milk and discusses innovations and perspectives. Several technological modifications are applied to flavored milk to improve the texture and sensorial characteristics of the product. Furthermore, a major appeal of these products is the reduction of added sugar through sweeteners and fruits (pulps and extracts) to meet the demand for healthy products and reduce the incidence of chronic diseases. Finally, emerging technologies have been widely used in the formulation of flavored milk, which produces products similar to conventional pasteurization, in addition to reducing energy expenditure in processing and offering a greater quantity of bioactive compounds. In any case, it is a product with great potential and has become increasingly common in the consumer’s diet.
Article
Full-text available
Context: The prevalence of obesity has led to a surge in public health initiatives aimed at curbing caloric intake and managing weight. As a result, the utilization of non-nutritive sweeteners has become more widespread globally. Preliminary findings indicate that these compounds can affect cardiovascular health adversely. Despite rising sweetener use, the cardiovascular effects are unknown. The present investigation evaluated the association between sweetener consumption and cardiovascular events. Longitudinal cohort studies were reviewed and meta-analyzed by us. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library provided language-and publication-neutral data. Myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality were the primary outcomes. Hypertension, diabetes, and other cardiovascular risk factors were secondary outcomes. The study adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Results: This study synthesized the literature on sweetener intake and cardiovascular outcomes. The findings were categorized based on the type of sweetener used, the amount administered, the length of exposure, and the demographic features of the subjects. The quality of the studies, consistency of the evidence, and potential for confounding and bias were considered when interpreting the findings. Conclusion: This comprehensive inquiry has provided substantial insights into the plausible cardiovascular impacts of the intake of non-nutritive sweeteners. The results of an extensive meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies suggest a plausible association between the consumption of artificial sweeteners and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The results presented in this study hold significant importance in shaping the ongoing discussion on dietary guidelines, public health initiatives, and personal dietary decisions, all aimed at enhancing cardiovascular health outcomes. The findings of the research highlight the necessity for additional investigation to enhance the comprehension of the fundamental mechanisms that support these observed associations. It is imperative to investigate the potential diverse impacts of different types of sweeteners. Based on a meticulous analysis of the available evidence, a potential association between the consumption of artificial sweeteners and adverse cardiovascular outcomes has been suggested. Further investigation is required to fully comprehend the nature and extent of this correlation.
Article
Full-text available
Most medical specialties including the field of gastroenterology are mainly aimed at treating diseases rather than preventing them. Genomic medicine studies the health/disease process based on the interaction of the human genes with the environment. The gastrointestinal (GI) system is an ideal model to analyze the interaction between our genes, emotions and the gut microbiota. Based on the current knowledge, this mini-review aims to provide an integrated synopsis of this interaction to achieve a better understanding of the GI disorders related to bad eating habits and stress-related disease. Since human beings are the result of an evolutionary process, many biological processes such as instincts, emotions and behavior are interconnected to guarantee survival. Nourishment is a physiological need triggered by the instinct of survival to satisfy the body’s energy demands. The brain-gut axis comprises a tightly connected neural-neuroendocrine circuitry between the hunger-satiety center, the dopaminergic reward system involved in the pleasure of eating and the gut microbiota that regulates which food we eat and emotions. However, genetic variations and the consumption of high-sugar and high-fat diets have overridden this energy/pleasure neurocircuitry to the point of addiction of several foodstuffs. Consequently, a gut dysbiosis generates inflammation and a negative emotional state may lead to chronic diseases. Balancing this altered processes to regain health may involve personalized-medicine and genome-based strategies. Thus, an integrated approach based on the understanding of the gene-emotions-gut microbiota interaction is the next frontier that awaits the gastroenterologist to prevent and treat GI disorders associated with obesity and negative emotions.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Substituting sweeteners with non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) may aid in glycaemic control and body weight management. Limited studies have investigated energy compensation, glycaemic and insulinaemic responses to artificial and natural NNS. Objectives: This study compared the effects of consuming NNS (artificial versus natural) and sucrose (65 g) on energy intake, blood glucose and insulin responses. Methods: Thirty healthy male subjects took part in this randomised, crossover study with four treatments: aspartame-, monk fruit-, stevia- and sucrose-sweetened beverages. On each test day, participants were asked to consume a standardised breakfast in the morning, and they were provided with test beverage as a preload in mid-morning and ad libitum lunch was provided an hour after test beverage consumption. Blood glucose and insulin concentrations were measured every 15 min within the first hour of preload consumption and every 30 min for the subsequent 2 h. Participants left the study site 3 h after preload consumption and completed a food diary for the rest of the day. Results: Ad libitum lunch intake was significantly higher for the NNS treatments compared with sucrose (P=0.010). The energy 'saved' from replacing sucrose with NNS was fully compensated for at subsequent meals; hence, no difference in total daily energy intake was found between the treatments (P=0.831). The sucrose-sweetened beverage led to large spikes in blood glucose and insulin responses within the first hour, whereas these responses were higher for all three NNS beverages following the test lunch. Thus, there were no differences in total area under the curve (AUC) for glucose (P=0.960) and insulin (P=0.216) over 3 h between the four test beverages. Conclusions: The consumption of calorie-free beverages sweetened with artificial and natural NNS have minimal influences on total daily energy intake, postprandial glucose and insulin compared with a sucrose-sweetened beverage.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Low-calorie sweetener use for weight control has come under increasing scrutiny as obesity, especially abdominal obesity, remain entrenched despite substantial low-calorie sweetener use. We evaluated whether chronic low-calorie sweetener use is a risk factor for abdominal obesity. Participants and Methods We used 8268 anthropometric measurements and 3096 food diary records with detailed information on low-calorie sweetener consumption in all food products, from 1454 participants (741 men, 713 women) in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging collected from 1984 to 2012 with median follow-up of 10 years (range: 0–28 years). At baseline, 785 were low-calorie sweetener non-users (51.7% men) and 669 participants were low-calorie sweetener users (50.1% men). Time-varying low-calorie sweetener use was operationalized as the proportion of visits since baseline at which low-calorie sweetener use was reported. We used marginal structural models to determine the association between baseline and time-varying low-calorie sweetener use with longitudinal outcomes—body mass index, waist circumference, obesity and abdominal obesity—with outcome status assessed at the visit following low-calorie sweetener ascertainment to minimize the potential for reverse causality. All models were adjusted for year of visit, age, sex, age by sex interaction, race, current smoking status, dietary intake (caffeine, fructose, protein, carbohydrate, and fat), physical activity, diabetes status, and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension score as confounders. Results With median follow-up of 10 years, low-calorie sweetener users had 0.80 kg/m² higher body mass index (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17–1.44), 2.6 cm larger waist circumference (95% CI, 0.71–4.39), 36.7% higher prevalence (prevalence ratio = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10–1.69) and 53% higher incidence (hazard ratio = 1.53; 95% CI 1.10–2.12) of abdominal obesity than low-calorie sweetener non-users. Conclusions Low-calorie sweetener use is independently associated with heavier relative weight, a larger waist, and a higher prevalence and incidence of abdominal obesity suggesting that low-calorie sweetener use may not be an effective means of weight control.
Article
Full-text available
Diet soda consumption has not been associated with tangible weight loss. Aspartame (ASP) commonly substitutes sugar and one of its breakdown products is phenylalanine (PHE), a known inhibitor of intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP), a gut enzyme shown to prevent metabolic syndrome in mice. We hypothesized that ASP consumption might contribute to the development of metabolic syndrome based on PHE’s inhibition of endogenous IAP. The design of the study was such that for the in vitro model, IAP was added to diet and regular soda, and IAP activity was measured. For the acute model, a closed bowel loop was created in mice. ASP or water was instilled into it and IAP activity was measured. For the chronic model, mice were fed chow or high-fat diet (HFD) with/without ASP in the drinking water for 18 weeks. The results were that for the in vitro study, IAP activity was lower (p < 0.05) in solutions containing ASP compared with controls. For the acute model, endogenous IAP activity was reduced by 50% in the ASP group compared with controls (0.2 ± 0.03 vs 0.4 ± 0.24) (p = 0.02). For the chronic model, mice in the HFD + ASP group gained more weight compared with the HFD + water group (48.1 ± 1.6 vs 42.4 ± 3.1, p = 0.0001). Significant difference in glucose intolerance between the HFD ± ASP groups (53 913 ± 4000.58 (mg·min)/dL vs 42 003.75 ± 5331.61 (mg·min)/dL, respectively, p = 0.02). Fasting glucose and serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels were significantly higher in the HFD + ASP group (1.23- and 0.87-fold increases, respectively, p = 0.006 and p = 0.01). In conclusion, endogenous IAP’s protective effects in regard to the metabolic syndrome may be inhibited by PHE, a metabolite of ASP, perhaps explaining the lack of expected weight loss and metabolic improvements associated with diet drinks.
Article
Full-text available
Escalating rates of obesity and public health messages to reduce excessive sugar intake have fuelled the consumption of artificial sweeteners in a wide range of products from breakfast cereals to snack foods and beverages. Artificial sweeteners impart a sweet taste without the associated energy and have been widely recommended by medical professionals since they are considered safe. However, associations observed in long-term prospective studies raise the concern that regular consumption of artificial sweeteners might actually contribute to development of metabolic derangements that lead to obesity, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Obtaining mechanistic data on artificial sweetener use in humans in relation to metabolic dysfunction is difficult due to the long time frames over which dietary factors might exert their effects on health and the large number of confounding variables that need to be considered. Thus, mechanistic data from animal models can be highly useful because they permit greater experimental control. Results from animal studies in both the agricultural sector and the laboratory indicate that artificial sweeteners may not only promote food intake and weight gain but can also induce metabolic alterations in a wide range of animal species. As a result, simple substitution of artificial sweeteners for sugars in humans may not produce the intended consequences. Instead consumption of artificial sweeteners might contribute to increases in risks for obesity or its attendant negative health outcomes. As a result, it is critical that the impacts of artificial sweeteners on health and disease continue to be more thoroughly evaluated in humans.
Article
The present study investigated the feasibility of a new experimental approach for studying the effect of covert nutritive dilution on the spontaneous food intake of obese individuals. Eight obese subjects were studied as inpatients on a metabolic unit for 15 days, during which time they were unaware that their food intake was being monitored. A platter method of food presentation encouraged ad libitum ingestion. Caloric dilution was achieved by replacing sucrose-containing products with aspartame-sweetened analogues in an otherwise normal diet. During the base-line period the subjects spontaneously ate sufficient conventional food to maintain or even slightly increase body weight. Covert substitution of aspartame-sweetened products for their sucrose counterparts resulted in an immediate reduction in spontaneous energy intake of approximately 25%. The aspartame analogues were as well accepted as their conventional counterparts, as indicated by the equal quantity of each consumed. These preliminary results demonstrate that, in a metabolic ward setting, it is possible to maintain the spontaneous food intake of obese individuals at levels sufficient to preserve body weight and arbitrarily to decrease those levels of intake by 25% or more through covert changes in the caloric density of the diet.
Article
Background/objectives: Artificial sweeteners are used widely to replace caloric sugar as one of the strategies to lessen caloric intake. However, the association between the risk of obesity and artificially-sweetened soda consumption is controversial. The objective of this meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between consumption of sugar and artificially-sweetened soda and obesity. Methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception through May 2015. Studies that reported relative risks, odd ratios, or hazard ratios comparing the risk of obesity in patients consuming either sugar or artificially-sweetened soda versus those who did not consume soda were included. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method. Results: Eleven studies were included in our analysis to assess the association between consumption of sugar-sweetened soda and obesity. The pooled RR of obesity in patients consuming sugar-sweetened soda was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.10-1.27). Three studies were included to assess the association between consumption of artificially-sweetened soda and obesity. The pooled RR of obesity in patients consuming artificially-sweetened soda was 1.59 (95% CI, 1.22-2.08). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated a significant association between sugar and artificially-sweetened soda consumption and obesity. This finding raises awareness and question of negative clinical impact on both sugar and artificially-sweetened soda and the risk of obesity.
Article
Objective: To examine the timing, frequency, and type of antibiotic exposure during the first 10 years of life in association with (over)weight across this period in a cohort of 979 children. Study design: Within the Child, Parents and Health: Lifestyle and Genetic Constitution Birth Cohort Study, antibiotic exposure record was obtained from general practitioners. Anthropometric outcomes (age- and sex-standardized body mass index, weight and height z-scores, and overweight) were measured repeatedly at 7 time points during the first 10 years of life. Generalized estimating equations method was used for statistical analysis. Results: After adjusting for confounding factors, children exposed to one course of antibiotics compared with none in the first 6 months of life had increased weight- (adjusted generalized estimating equations estimates [adjβ] 0.24; 95% CI 0.03-0.44) and height (adjβ 0.23; 95% CI 0.0002-0.46) z-scores; exposure to ≥2 courses during the second year of life was associated with both increased weight (adjβ 0.34; 95% CI 0.07-0.60), and height z-scores (adjβ 0.29; 95% CI -0.003 to 0.59). Exposure later in life was not associated with anthropometric outcomes. Associations with weight z-scores were mainly driven by exposure to broad- (≥2 courses: adjβ 0.11; 95% CI 0.003-0.22) and narrow-spectrum β-lactams (1 course: adjβ 0.18; 95% CI 0.005-0.35) during the follow-up period. Specific antibiotic used was not associated with body mass index z-scores and overweight. Conclusions: Repeated exposure to antibiotics early in life, especially β-lactam agents, is associated with increased weight and height. If causality of obesity can be established in future studies, this further highlights the need for restrictive antibiotic use and avoidance of prescriptions when there is minimal clinical benefit.
Article
Nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) have become an important part of everyday life and are increasingly used nowadays in a variety of dietary and medicinal products. They provide fewer calories and far more intense sweetness than sugar-containing products and are used by a plethora of population subsets for varying objectives. Six of these agents (aspartame, saccharine, sucralose, neotame, acesulfame-K, and stevia) have previously received a generally recognized as safe status from the United States Food and Drug Administration, and two more (Swingle fruit extract and advantame) have been added in the recent years to this ever growing list. They are claimed to promote weight loss and deemed safe for consumption by diabetics; however, there is inconclusive evidence to support most of their uses and some recent studies even hint that these earlier established benefits regarding NNS use might not be true. There is a lack of properly designed randomized controlled studies to assess their efficacy in different populations, whereas observational studies often remain confounded due to reverse causality and often yield opposite findings. Pregnant and lactating women, children, diabetics, migraine, and epilepsy patients represent the susceptible population to the adverse effects of NNS-containing products and should use these products with utmost caution. The overall use of NNS remains controversial, and consumers should be amply informed about the potential risks of using them, based on current evidence-based dietary guidelines. © 2016 Indian Journal of Pharmacology Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.
Article
Importance: The consumption of artificial sweeteners has increased substantially in recent decades, including among pregnant women. Animal studies suggest that exposure to artificial sweeteners in utero may predispose offspring to develop obesity; however, to our knowledge, this has never been studied in humans. Objective: To determine whether maternal consumption of artificially sweetened beverages during pregnancy is associated with infant body mass index (BMI [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]). Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included 3033 mother-infant dyads from the Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) Study, a population-based birth cohort that recruited healthy pregnant women from 2009 to 2012. Women completed dietary assessments during pregnancy, and their infants' BMI was measured at 1 year of age (n = 2686; 89% follow-up). Statistical analysis for this study used data collected after the first year of follow-up, which was completed in October 2013. The data analysis was conducted in August 2015. Exposures: Maternal consumption of artificially sweetened beverages and sugar-sweetened beverages during pregnancy, determined by a food frequency questionnaire. Main outcomes and measures: Infant BMI z score and risk of overweight at 1 year of age, determined from objective anthropometric measurements and defined according to World Health Organization reference standards. Results: The mean (SD) age of the 3033 pregnant women was 32.4 (4.7) years, and their mean (SD) BMI was 24.8 (5.4). The mean (SD) infant BMI z score at 1 year of age was 0.19 (1.05), and 5.1% of infants were overweight. More than a quarter of women (29.5%) consumed artificially sweetened beverages during pregnancy, including 5.1% who reported daily consumption. Compared with no consumption, daily consumption of artificially sweetened beverages was associated with a 0.20-unit increase in infant BMI z score (adjusted 95% CI, 0.02-0.38) and a 2-fold higher risk of infant overweight at 1 year of age (adjusted odds ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.23-3.88). These effects were not explained by maternal BMI, diet quality, total energy intake, or other obesity risk factors. There were no comparable associations for sugar-sweetened beverages. Conclusions and relevance: To our knowledge, we provide the first human evidence that maternal consumption of artificial sweeteners during pregnancy may influence infant BMI. Given the current epidemic of childhood obesity and widespread use of artificial sweeteners, further research is warranted to confirm our findings and investigate the underlying biological mechanisms, with the ultimate goal of informing evidence-based dietary recommendations for pregnant women.