Confirmatory factor analysis of the Thought Occurrence Questionnaire for Sport (TOQS) among adolescent athletes

Loughborough University, Loughborough, England, United Kingdom
Anxiety Stress & Coping (Impact Factor: 1.97). 09/2005; 18(3). DOI: 10.1080/10615800500134266
Source: OAI


There is an inherent link between theory and measurement suggesting that validation of measures should be the first stage of theory testing. The aim of the present study was to cross-validate the factorial validity of the Thought Occurrence Questionnaire for Sport for use among adolescent athletes. National standard young athletes (Individual N_/204; Team N_/360) completed the TOQS questionnaire. Single-sample and multisample confirmatory factor analysis provided support for the psychometric integrity of the hypothesized three-factor correlated model. Multisample results demonstrated invariance for factor loadings and correlations between individual and team athletes. Internal consistency coefficients were over the .70 criterion for acceptability. Findings lend support to previous validation studies conducted on samples of adult athletes and suggest that the TOQS provides an equally valid measure for use among adolescent athletes. It is suggested that the TOQS can be used to investigate theoretical issues related to cognitive interference during competition.

Download full-text


Available from: Alan Michael Nevill
    • "These thoughts and worries draw attention away from primary task execution leading to hampered performance. Anecdotal evidence (e.g., Gerrard, 2007) and studies examining athletes' thoughts during competition (e.g., Hatzigeorgiadis, 2002; Hatzigeorgiadis & Biddle, 2000, 2001; Lane, Harwood, & Nevill, 2005; Wilson & Smith, 2007), seem to suggest that, rather than skill-focused attention, all kinds of distracting thoughts and worries naturally occur when athletes perform under pressure. However, only thoughts unrelated to task execution (e.g., performance worries and task-irrelevant thoughts) were included in the questionnaires employed, while task-related thoughts (e.g., skill-focused attention) were not examined. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Choking under pressure in sport has been explained by either explicit attention to skill execution (self-focus theories), or attention to performance worries (distraction theories). The aim of the present study was to find out which focus of attention occurs most often when expert athletes perform under pressure. Two retrospective methods were employed, namely, verbal reports and concept mapping. In the verbal reports, 70 expert athletes indicated their main focus of attention when performing under high pressure in competition. For concept mapping seven expert athletes generated statements about their focus of attention in such high-pressure situations. These statements were clustered and rated on how often they occurred and how important they were for choking. Both methods revealed that under pressure attention of expert athletes was often focused on worries and hardly ever on movement execution. Furthermore, the athletes reported that they focused attention on external factors and that they reverted to positive monitoring in an attempt to maintain performance. These results are more in line with distraction theories than self-focus theories, suggesting that attention to performance worries rather than to skill execution generally explains choking.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2011 · Anxiety, stress, and coping
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Full-text of this article is not available in this e-prints service. This article was originally published in International Journal of Sport Psychology, published by and copyright Edizioni Luigi Pozzi s.r.l. The current study aimed to test the predictions of processing efficiency theory (PET) (Eysenck & Calvo, 1992) in an ecologically valid, team sport competition. Eighteen, elite female hockey players taking part in an international competition were categorised as either high or low trait anxious (HTA, LTA). Games were categorised as being either of high or low criticality, and players’ individual performance was assessed independently by two senior international coaches. Cognitive state anxiety, as indexed by the frequency of ‘performance worry’ cognitive intrusions, and subsequent mental effort expenditure were assessed using the Thought Occurrence Questionnaire for Sport (Hatzigeorgiadis & Biddle, 2000). While anxiety (p <.001) and effort (p <.001) were significantly greater in high criticality games, there was no significant change in performance (p >.05). As predicted by PET, performance was maintained at the expense of processing efficiency, and this effect was more marked in HTA individuals.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2007 · International journal of sport psychology
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present investigation was to develop an instrument assessing the content and the structure of athletes' self-talk. The study was conducted in three stages. In the first stage, a large pool of items was generated and content analysis was used to organize the items into categories. Furthermore, item-content relevance analysis was conducted to help identifying the most appropriate items. In Stage 2, the factor structure of the instrument was examined by a series of exploratory factor analyses (Sample A: N = 507), whereas in Stage 3 the results of the exploratory factor analysis were retested through confirmatory factor analyses (Sample B: N = 766) and at the same time concurrent validity were assessed. The analyses revealed eight factors, four positive (psych up, confidence, anxiety control and instruction), three negative (worry, disengagement and somatic fatigue) and one neutral (irrelevant thoughts). The findings of the study provide evidence regarding the multidimensionality of self-talk, suggesting that ASTQS seems a psychometrically sound instrument that could help us developing cognitive-behavioral theories and interventions to examine and modify athletes' self-talk.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2009 · Sport Psychologist
Show more