ArticlePDF Available

Internet of things and supply chain management: a literature review


Abstract and Figures

This paper explores the role of Internet of Things (IoT) and its impact on supply chain management (SCM) through an extensive literature review. Important aspects of IoT in SCM are covered including IoT definition, main IoT technology enablers and various SCM processes and applications. We offer several categorisation of the extant literature, such as based on methodology, industry sector and focus on a classification based on major supply chain processes. In addition, a bibliometric analysis of the literature is also presented. We find that most studies have focused on conceptualising the impact of IoT with limited analytical models and empirical studies. In addition, most studies have focused on the delivery supply chain process and the food and manufacturing supply chains. Areas of future SCM research that can support IoT implementation are also identified.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
International Journal of Production Research
ISSN: 0020-7543 (Print) 1366-588X (Online) Journal homepage:
Internet of things and supply chain management:
a literature review
Mohamed Ben-Daya, Elkafi Hassini & Zied Bahroun
To cite this article: Mohamed Ben-Daya, Elkafi Hassini & Zied Bahroun (2019) Internet of things
and supply chain management: a literature review, International Journal of Production Research,
57:15-16, 4719-4742, DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140
To link to this article:
Published online: 16 Nov 2017.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 15564
View related articles
View Crossmark data
Citing articles: 50 View citing articles
Internet of things and supply chain management: a literature review
Mohamed Ben-Daya
*, ElkaHassini
and Zied Bahroun
Industrial Engineering Department, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates;
DeGroote School of Business,
McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
(Received 6 August 2017; accepted 31 October 2017)
This paper explores the role of Internet of Things (IoT) and its impact on supply chain management (SCM) through an
extensive literature review. Important aspects of IoT in SCM are covered including IoT denition, main IoT technology
enablers and various SCM processes and applications. We offer several categorisation of the extant literature, such as
based on methodology, industry sector and focus on a classication based on major supply chain processes. In addition,
a bibliometric analysis of the literature is also presented. We nd that most studies have focused on conceptualising the
impact of IoT with limited analytical models and empirical studies. In addition, most studies have focused on the deliv-
ery supply chain process and the food and manufacturing supply chains. Areas of future SCM research that can support
IoT implementation are also identied.
Keywords: Internet of Things (IoT); supply chain management; industry 4.0; supply chain processes; smart supply chain
1. Introduction
In modern business management, individual businesses cannot compete as independent entities but rather as active
members of the wider supply chain involving a network of multiple businesses and relationships (Lambert and Cooper
2000). As such, supply chains are operating under an ever-changing environment and are vulnerable to a myriad of risks
at all levels. This environment is an ever-changing landscape because of many factors. Many supply chains extend over
wide geographical areas and are vulnerable to many global risks (Butner 2010). Customers are more and more demand-
ing in terms of product customisation, price and level of service (Christopher 2016). Products complexity is also increas-
ing due to the high clock speed in many industries following the rapid changes in technology and the continuous
introduction of new products to the market (Simchi-Levi, Kaminsky, and Levi 2003). Furthermore, the external environ-
ment is highly dynamic due to economic (energy cost, prices and availability of raw materials, currency exchange rates),
social (unrest, demanding customers) and natural factors (extreme weather conditions, earthquakes, tsunamis).
In order to survive in such a complex environment, companies need to be extremely agile and build a high level of
resilience and risk mitigation capabilities and structural exibility that allow rapid response to these challenges. Christo-
pher and Holweg (2011)dene structural exibility as the ability of the supply chain to adapt to fundamental changes
in the business environment. However, exibility and resilience come at an additional cost in the form of additional
resources such as buffer inventory and extra capacity, and higher coordination cost (Christopher and Holweg 2011). In
order to balance the required level of resilience and exibility and the cost of achieving it, rms need to have high visi-
bility of the whole supply chain, the necessary velocity to respond quickly to changes and effective collaboration with
suppliers and customers. Christopher (2016) summarised the principles that can guide supply chain managers into what
he calls the 4Rs: responsiveness, reliability, resilience and relationships.
Information technology (IT) has been, and continue to be, an essential enabler for effective supply chain manage-
ment (SCM) (Ross 2016). It plays a critical role in helping supply chains deal with the challenges of ever-changing
environment and a myriad of risks at all levels. IT has made a major impact on the nature and structure of supply chains
due to its ability of internal integration of various processes and more importantly external integration with suppliers
and customers. This has been achieved through improving communication, acquiring and transmitting data, thus
enabling effective decision-making and enhancing supply chain performance. Internet of Things (IoT), one of the latest
IT developments, is a new IT revolution providing a paradigm shift in several areas including SCM. IoT takes supply
chain communications to another level: the possibility of human to things communication and autonomous coordination
among thingswhile being stored in a facility or being transported between different supply chain entities. These new
*Corresponding author. Email:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
International Journal of Production Research, 2019
Vol. 57, Nos. 1516, 47194742,
capabilities offer tremendous opportunities to deal more effectively with SCM challenges. IoT provides new levels of
supply chain visibility, agility and adaptability to cope with various SCM challenges (Ellis, Morris, and Santagate
2015). The data emitted from smart objects, when effectively collected, analysed and turned into useful information, can
offer unprecedented visibility into all aspects of the supply chain, providing early warnings of internal and external situ-
ations that require remediation. Responding to these signals in time can drive new levels of supply chain efciency.
What was lacking so far is not the availability of information but rather the technologies for collecting and processing
big data and the lag between data collection and action. IoT will allow the reduction in the time between data capture
and decision-making that enables supply chains to react to changes in real time allowing levels of agility and respon-
siveness never experienced before (Ellis, Morris, and Santagate 2015). IoT will also enable remote management of sup-
ply chain operations, better coordination with partners and can provide more accurate information for more effective
This paper deals with IoT and its impact on supply chain management (SCM) through an extensive literature review.
This review covered important aspects of IoT in SCM including IoT denition, main IoT technology elements needed
in its implementation in a supply chain context, and various SCM applications. The extant literature is categorised
according to several classication schemes, including methodology, industry sector and focus and major supply chain
processes. A bibliometric analysis of the reviewed literature is presented as well. The current review reveals that the
research dealing with analytical models and empirical studies is very limited. Most studies have focused on conceptual-
ising the impact of IoT. In addition, most studies have focused on the delivery process, the food and manufacturing sup-
ply chains. Following the review, we identied areas of future SCM research that can support IoT implementation.
This paper is organised as follows. Section 2provides background information about IoT including historical back-
ground, denitions and enabling technologies and platforms. We explain our review methodology in Section 3where
we also provide summary bibliometric analysis. An extensive and representative literature review is presented in Sec-
tion 4. The focus is on IoT application in various SCM processes. Section 5contains a discussion of the reviewed litera-
ture. Finally, opportunities for future research directions and conclusions are included in Section 6.
2. About IoT
In this section, we provide a discussion on the history of IoT and its enabling technologies. We also offer a denition of
IoT that is relevant to supply chain management.
2.1 Historical background
The precursor to IoT is the concept of connected devices that started in the early 1990s at the Auto-ID Centre at MIT.
Reportedly, Kevin Ashton, director of the Centre, has coined the term IoT in 1999 (Greengard 2015). In 1997, Ashton
considered the possibility of using radio-frequency identication (RFID) tags to track products through Procter and
Gambles supply chain. RFID tags were used to read and identify objects and then transmit the information wirelessly
through a network. Prior to that, industry adoption of RFID tags started in 1980 (Xu, He, and Li 2014). Then a new
concept of sensors and actuators through a wireless sensor network (WSN) appeared to sense, track and monitor objects
with applications in healthcare and trafc management (Xu, He, and Li 2014). Nowadays, these networks are enriched
with GPS devices, smartphones, social networks, cloud computing and data analytics to support the modern concept of
In Europe, and particularly Germany, IoT is one of the founding technologies of Industry 4.0 in the manufacturing
sector. Industry 4.0 refers to the fourth industrial revolution where the three rst industrial revolutions are related to
mechanical power (Industry 1.0), mass production (Industry 2.0) and digital revolution (Industry 3.0). Zhou, Liu, and
Zhou (2015)dene the concept of industry 4.0 as the integration of information and communications technologies with
industrial technology.
In addition to IoT technology, Industry 4.0 needs cyberphysical systems (CPS) and cloud manufacturing (CM). A
CPS is composed of machines, storage systems and production facilities that could autonomously exchange information,
trigger actions and monitor each other (Kagermann, Wahlster, and Helbig 2013). According to Cheng et al. (2016), a
CPS links a manufacturing entity virtual (computing) and physical (machines) elements by integrating analogue/digital
hardware. IoT provides the needed platform to connect the CPS using a network of sensors, actuators and devices. IoT
platforms use generally cloud-computing capabilities in external data centres, which led to the concept of cloud manu-
facturing (CM) in the industry 4.0 context.
4720 M. Ben-Daya et al.
2.2 Dening IoT
Many denitions of the IoT are available in the literature. According to Atzori, Iera, and Morabito (2010), the main rea-
son for this is that IoT is composed of two words: Internetand Thingsand so we have two main visions. The rst
vision is mainly oriented towards the Internetor the network component and the second one is oriented towards the
thingscomponent. The rst denitions of IoT are more thingsoriented (Atzori, Iera, and Morabito 2010) and concern
mainly the RFID tags that are connected to a network to transmit identication information (Xu, He, and Li 2014).
Later, more thingsappeared as sensors and actuators to englobe todays mobile devices in general. Below we include
a representative selection of denitions to reect the variety in IoT interpretation:
Things having identities and virtual personalities operating in smart spaces using intelligent interfaces to connect and communi-
cate within social, environmental, and user contexts. (INFSO 2008)
The term ‘‘Internet-of-Things’’ is used as an umbrella keyword for covering various aspects related to the extension of the
Internet and the Web into the physical realm, by means of the widespread deployment of spatially distributed devices with
embedded identication, sensing and/or actuation capabilities. Internet-of-Things envisions a future in which digital and physi-
cal entities can be linked, by means of appropriate information and communication technologies, to enable a whole new class
of applications and services. (Miorandi et al. 2012)
Interconnection of sensing and actuating devices providing the ability to share information across platforms through a unied
framework, developing a common operating picture for enabling innovative applications. This is achieved by seamless large-
scale sensing, data analytics and information representation using cutting edge ubiquitous sensing and cloud computing. Gubbi
et al. (2013)
A loosely coupled, decentralized system of cooperating Smart Objects (SOs). An SO is an autonomous, physical digital object
augmented with sensing/actuating, processing, storing, and networking capabilities. SOs are able to sense/actuate, store, and
interpret information created within themselves and around the neighboring external world where they are situated, act on their
own, cooperate with each other, and exchange information with other kinds of electronic devices and human users. Fortino and
Dynamic global network infrastructure with self-conguring capabilities based on standard and interoperable communication
protocols where physical and virtual Thingshave identities, physical attributes, and virtual personalities and use intelligent
interfaces, and are seamlessly integrated into the information network. Xu, He, and Li (2014)
Group of infrastructures interconnecting connected objects and allowing their management, data mining and the access to the
data they generate. (Connected objects are dene as Sensor(s) and/or actuator(s) carrying out a specic function and that are
able to communicate with other equipment. It is part of an infrastructure allowing the transport, storage, processing and access
to the generated data by users or other systems. Dorsemaine et al. (2015)
Our goal here is to offer a denition of IoT as it relates to supply chain management. A supply chain is a set of enti-
ties and processes that are involved in fullling a customer order. The entities often include suppliers, factories, distribu-
tors, retailers and customers. According to the SCOR model (APICS 2015) supply chain processes are classied as
plan, source, make, deliver, return and enable. As dened in Hassini (2008), the role of supply chain management is to
maximise the surplus: the price paid by the end customer minus all the costs incurred throughout the supply chain.
Given our focus in this paper on IoT and supply chain management, we offer this denition for IoT:
The Internet of Things is a network of physical objects that are digitally connected to sense, monitor and interact within a com-
pany and between the company and its supply chain enabling agility, visibility, tracking and information sharing to facilitate
timely planning, control and coordination of the supply chain processes.
Our proposed denition includes four key features: (i) The requirement for digital connectivity of the physical things
in the supply chain; (ii) The nature of this connectivity is proactive allowing for data storage, analysis and sharing; (iii)
The communication involves processes within an organisation as well as interorganisation transactions covering all
major supply chain processes; and (iv) IoT will facilitate planning, control and coordination of the supply chain pro-
A closely related concept to IoT is Industry 4.0 or Industrial IoT (IIoT). As mentioned earlier, Industry 4.0 is the
product of combining CPS and IoT to the industrial automation domain (e.g. see Wollschlaeger, Sauter, and Jasperneite
2017). Thus, IoT is credited for being an enabler of Industry 4.0 that led to a fourth industrial revolution. The things
in Industry 4.0 could include smart products, smart machines and smart services such as quality-controlled logistics and
International Journal of Production Research 4721
2.3 IoT technology
As in Xu, He, and Li (2014), a typical IoT network includes four main essential layers:
(1) A sensing layer that integrates different types of thingslike RFID tags, sensors, actuators;
(2) A networking layer that supports information transfer through wired or wireless network;
(3) A service layer that integrates services and applications through a middleware technology; and
(4) An interface layer to display information to the user and that allows interaction with the system.
In Table 1, we provide some communication and data IoT protocols (Postcapes 2017). Recent protocols are speci-
cally designed for IoT devices such as NB-IoT, LoraWan or Sigfox. They all use low-power wide-area networks
(LPWAN) in order to connect at a low bit rate a large number of devices with low energy consumption and low cost.
Indeed, remote smart machines or embedded sensors usually only need to send small quantity of data at regular intervals
and sometimes they need to connect in remote areas without the traditional wireless or cellular infrastructure and with-
out a convenient power supply (Postcapes 2017).
Lee and Lee (2015)dened ve key IoT technologies:
(1) Radio-frequency identication (RFID): It allows identifying, tracking and transmitting information. There are
ve main classes of RFID tags (López et al. 2011). The class 1 tags are only passive tags with a read/write
memory. Some security related functionalities are added to class 2 tags. Semi-passive tags (class 3) are powered
by a battery and may include sensors. Active tags (class 4) are also battery-powered and can communicate with
similar tags. Finally, class 5 tags can activate other tags and are directly connected to back-end networks.
(2) Wireless sensor networks (WSN): It is a network composed of a set of sensors to monitor and track the status
of different devices like their location, movements or temperature. Sensors can be used for a multitude of pur-
poses such as temperature, pressure, ow, level, imaging, noise, air pollution, proximity and displacement, infra-
red, moisture and humidity and speed (Rayes and Salam 2016). They also can cooperate and communicate with
RFID tags (Lee and Lee 2015).
Table 1. Some IoT protocols (Postcapes 2017).
Type Protocol Features
Infrastructure IPV6 Internet layer protocol for transmission across IP networks
6LoWPAN Low-power wireless personal area networks. Adaption of IPV6
Communication/transport IEEE
Physical layer and media access control used as a basic standard for other
communication protocols such as Zigbee
Bluetooth Transfer data up to 3 Mbps and a maximum range of 100 m
Zigbee Can handle a maximum number of 1024 nodes with a maximum range of
300 m and based on IEEE 802.15.4 standards
WiWireless local area networking based on the IEEE 802.11 standards. An access
point has usually a range of 20-m indoors a greater range outdoors
WiMax Wireless metropolitan area networks based on IEEE 802.16 standards. The
range for xed stations can reach 50 km and for mobile stations between 5 and
15 km
Communication/transport: low-power
wide-area networks (LPWAN)
NB-IoT Narrow Band IoT is a radio technology standard specically designed for
indoor coverage of a large number of devices with low cost, long battery life
and using cellular telecommunications bands
LoraWan Wireless Network protocol for battery-operated devices in regional or global
Sigfox Global wireless network for securely connecting devices to the cloud with a
low energy consumption and low cost
Data protocols MQTT Message Queuing Telemetry Transport to enable publishing messaging model in
a lightweight way for a machine-to-machine connectivity
MQTT-SN Specically designed for sensor networks
XMPP Open source technology for Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
mainly used for real-time communication and people to people communication
Specically designed for machine-to-machine and machine-to-people
4722 M. Ben-Daya et al.
(3) Middleware: It is a service-oriented software layer that allows software developers the possibility to communi-
cate with heterogeneous devices like sensors, actuators or RFID tags.
(4) Cloud computing: It is an internet-based computing platform where a pool of different computing resources
(computers, networks, storage, software, etc.) can be shared and accessed on demand. Cloud computing is criti-
cal to IoT deployment because of the huge volume of data generated by IoT devices and the need for it to be
analysed with high-speed processing computers to enable real-time and efcient decision-making (Lee and Lee
2015). Many IoT cloud platforms are available on the market. They play the same role as the middleware soft-
ware and their main purpose is to connect IoT devices and IoT applications. They help transmit and secure data
from IoT devices to ERP systems and business intelligence software to provide decision-makers with real-time
information. Table 2includes the most common IoT platforms and their key characteristics. In this table, we
classied the features into four categories: connectivity, security, event monitoring and advanced analytics, as
per the platforms machine learning capabilities. Cloud-computing services represent an efcient alternative to
own and manage data centres (Bonomi et al. 2014). However, for some latency-sensitive applications, companies
may need local and on premise storage, computing and communication capabilities (Bonomi et al. 2014). The
concept of fog computing mixes local and cloud-computing services and consists in a highly virtualized plat-
form that provides compute, storage, and networking services between end devices and traditional cloud comput-
ing data centres(Bonomi et al. 2012). Indeed, IoT deployment requires mobility support, geo-distribution,
location awareness and low latency that can only be achieved through fog computing capabilities (Bonomi et al.
(5) IoT applications: they enable device to device and humans to device interactions. IoT applications constitute the
interface between the user and the devices. They should be able to present data in an intuitive way, identify
problems and suggest solutions (Lee and Lee 2015).
3. Review methodology and summary
In this section, we describe how we conducted our literature search as well as the procedure we used to select the
reviewed literature. We also categorise the studied literature and present several summary statistics. Finally, inspired by
Fahimnia, Sarkis, and Davarzani (2015) and Mishra et al. (2016), we include the results of a bibliometric and network
analysis of the reviewed papers.
3.1 Review methodology
The main objective of a literature review is to map and evaluate the relevant and existing literature to identify future
research questions (Traneld, Denyer, and Smart 2003). Our literature review method has two stages: a systematic litera-
ture review followed by a bibliometric analysis. This approach has been called Systematic Literature Network Analysis
(SLNA)by Colicchia and Strozzi (2012). The method has been found to be more objective and suitable for studying
emerging elds and their trends (e.g. see Fahimnia, Sarkis, and Davarzani 2015; Mishra et al. 2016; Strozzi et al. 2017).
To map the existing literature, we started by dening the best key words for collecting the most relevant literature to
Table 2. Representative list of IoT Platforms (M&S Consulting 2017).
IoT platform Connectivity (more than internet) Security Event monitoring Machine learning
Amazon Web Services (AWS) x x x x
Carriots x x x
Cisco IoT Cloud Connect x x x
GE Predix x x x x
IBM Watson x x x x
Microsoft Azure x x x x
Kaa x x x x
Oracle IoT x x x x
Salesforce IoT platform x x x
SAP Leonardo x x x x
Thingworx x x x x
International Journal of Production Research 4723
our topic. We have chosen a combination of Internet of Things,supply chain,supply chain management,Industry
4.0,smart supply chains. We mainly used Google Scholar ( to look for different types of
papers. The application of IoT concepts in supply chains is still recent and for that reason, we used Google Scholar
rather than Web of Science or Scopus to search the relevant literature because it is a wider database. We also searched
directly on some publisherswebsites such as Elsevier (, Springer (, Tay-
lor & Francis ( and Emerald ( We then rened our search and studied care-
fully each paper to only select the most relevant papers to our topic. Indeed, there are many studies that have looked,
for example, at the impact of RFID on supply chain operations. In this review, we focused only on the studies that have
explicitly addressed IoT implications on the supply chain, for example, when the RFID tag has the capability to commu-
nicate wirelessly with other thingsin the supply chain. For this reason, we only considered papers that were published
post-2008 and for RFID papers that were published pre-2008, the reader can refer to the reviews by Sarac, Absi, and
Dauzère-Pérès (2010) and Lim, Bahr, and Leung (2013).
We repeated this cycle of searching, studying and selecting relevant papers many times from January 2017 to June
2017 given that the topic is still new and very dynamic. During each iteration, we enriched our literature review by new
papers. We nally selected 166 studies. Table 3details the selected studies by type of publication. We note that about
20% of the reviewed literature appeared in conference proceedings and books.
3.2 Bibliometric analysis
We conducted a bibliometric analysis using BibExcel software (Persson, Danell, and Schneider 2009). We have chosen
this software for its exibility and compatibility with network analysis tools such as Gephi software (Mishra et al.
(2016). The initial research information system (RIS) citations le data were obtained from Scopus and Google Scholar.
We then obtained some relevant statistics using BibExcel.
Figure 1(a) shows the publications distribution from 2008 to 2017. It is clear that there is a sharp increase in the
number of publications since 2015 (2017 publications include only publications up to June 2017) indicating an
increased interest in the subject.
Table 3shows the top contributing journals. We included only those journals that had at least ve or more papers.
We note that close to 21% of the studies appeared in the International Journal of Production Economics (13.2%) and
the International Journal of Production Research (7.2%). This may be an indication of the openness of these two jour-
nals to publications in the area of new disruptive and innovative technologies. It may also be because these two journals
are highly ranked according to their recent impact factors as well as their ABDC rankings.
We then classied the papers according to six categories: two based on applications (IT enablers and special applica-
tions) and the remaining four based on the main SCOR model processes (Source, Make, Deliver, Return and Enable)
(APICS 2015). We note that a paper can belong to more than one category. Figure 1(b) shows that most of the papers
are related to the makeor deliverprocesses. Few researchers were interested in applying IoT concepts in the Source
or Returnprocesses. This can be explained by the fact that by design IoT technologies are more amenable to the man-
ufacturing and transportation operations in the supply chain. However, we expect there will be more interest in the sour-
cing and return functions given the increase of supplier disruptions and online shopping.
We also classied the reviewed literature according to the type of contribution (review, conceptual framework or IT
enabler) as well as methodology (analytical, empirical or case study). We note that one paper can belong to more than
Table 3. Statistics for the reviewed literature.
Type of publication Frequency
Journal 132
Conference 22
Book series 6
Book Chapter 4
Book 2
Journal Number
International Journal of Production Economics 22
International Journal of Production Research 12
Others 132
4724 M. Ben-Daya et al.
one type. We can see in Figure 1(c), that most of the authors developed conceptual frameworks or detailed IT enablers
for implementing IoT related concepts in supply chain management. There are less analytical or empirical studies which
is understandable for a new eld. However, we note that their number is increasing in 2016 and 2017.
Using BibExcel and Gephi, we conducted co-citation analysis on the reviewed papers to obtain insight on the differ-
ent studies topics and their relationships. We have used modularity partition and PageRank for ranking (Mishra et al.
2016). The resulted network graph is shown in Figure 2. We can see that there are three main clusters. Cluster 1, 2 and
3 accounted for about 58, 19 and 15% of the co-cited papers, respectively. The top ve papers, according to PageRank
ranking, related to these clusters are summarised in Table 4.
Cluster 1 is formed by early studies that looked at the use of RFID tags in supply chains with a focus on inventory accu-
racy. Cluster 2 contains studies that proposed IoT technology frameworks as well as reviewed the literature related to IoT
technologies. Finally, Cluster 3 groups studies that addressed supply chain sustainability performance measures and how
the adoption of innovative technologies can help in that eld. From Figure 2, we note that the papers in Cluster 2 are inde-
pendent. Furthermore, the clusters are not connected to each other. One possible interpretation is that this eld is still in its
infancy and most studies are early independent attempts at understanding the impact of IoT on the supply chain. This justi-
es the need for our review to synthesise the different studies and offer possible future research directions.
4. Literature review
In this section, we report on our literature review. We start by positioning our review with respect to other recent
reviews in this area. We then classify the literature into six categories based on the type of applications and the studied
supply chain process.
a. Distribution by year
b. Distribution by category c. Distribution b
e of contribution
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Number of Publications
Number of Publications
Number of Publications
Figure 1. Bibliometric analysis results.
International Journal of Production Research 4725
4.1 Related literature reviews
There are several literature reviews on the subject of IoT and supply chain. In this section, we summarise those that are
most relevant to our review and explain how our review is different. Musa and Dabo (2016) focus on RFID uses in sup-
ply chain management in the period 20002015. Strozzi et al. (2017) review the literature on smart factories and thus
focus only on the manufacturing sector. In addition, the authors restrict their review to only those papers that are listed
on Web of Science between 2007 and 2016. Liao et al. (2017) have focused on Industry 4.0, with no particular attention
to supply chain management or the wider applications of IoT that extend beyond Industry 4.0, as we have explained in
Section 2. Liu et al. (2017) conducted a citation and content analysis of IoT literature with a focus on technology. Nas-
kar, Basu, and Sen (2017) study applications of RFID in the supply chain. They have classied the literature based on
the type of studies and supply chain processes. We nd that these recent reviews either focus on a subset of IoT tech-
nologies or address a particular application area. Our review takes a more comprehensive look at IoT technologies with
a focus on impacts on supply chain management in different sectors and application areas.
Cluster 1
Cluster 2
Cluster 3
Figure 2. Co-citation clusters graph.
Table 4. Co-citations cluster topics.
Cluster Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3
Papers Heese (2007), Angeles (2005),Sarac,
Absi, and Dauzère-Pérès (2010),
Gaukler, Seifert, and Hausman (2007),
Tajima (2007)
Karakostas (2013), Meyer, Främling, and
Holmström (2009), Li et al. (2012),
Atzori, Iera, and Morabito (2010), Lim,
Bahr, and Leung (2013)
Barratt and Oke (2007), Srivastava
(2007), Vachon and Mao (2008),
Vachon and Klassen (2008), Zhu and
Sarkis (2004)
Topics Inventory accuracy, RFID application in
supply chains
Technology frameworks and reviews Performance measurement,
4726 M. Ben-Daya et al.
4.2 IoT Applications in SCM processes
One framework for understanding supply chains is the process centric view of the supply chain (Chopra and Meindl
2013). The SCOR model is a well know such framework that divides the supply chain processes into Plan, Source,
Make, Deliver, Return and Enable (APICS 2015). This model has been widely accepted in practice largely because of
its ability to link processes to performance metrics and as such has been employed to conduct process centric views of
supply chain-related literature reviews (e.g. see Naskar, Basu, and Sen 2017). IoT brings several capabilities to aid sup-
ply chain management, such as cost-saving, inventory accuracy and product tracking. However, the extent of IoT impact
on the different supply chain processes is not known. It is thus our goal in this review to identify the role of IoT on sup-
ply chain management through a systematic analysis of the literature based on which supply chain process is being
impacted. Since the Plan process is implicated in all other SCOR processes, it our literature analysis we focus on the
other SCOR processes. We start with the Enable process to explain the different IoT technology that will be relevant for
application in the other processes.
4.2.1 IT Enablers
Most of the authors generally agree that the enabling technologies for the IoT are usually composed of four main layers:
(i) a data collection layer using mainly RFID objects and sensors, (ii) a transmission layer such as xed and mobile net-
works, (iii) service layer and (iv) interface layer (Lou et al. 2011; Gubbi et al. 2013; Verdouw, Beulens, and van der
Vorst 2013; Borgia 2014; Xu, He, and Li 2014). The third and fourth layers are sometimes merged into one layer. Fer-
reira, Martinho, and Domingos (2010)dened the logistics functions of different internet of things in terms of identify-
ing, tracing, location tracking, monitoring, real-time responsiveness and optimisation. Yuvaraj and Sangeetha (2016)
combined RFID tags for indoor product tracking with GPS technology to track the same products outdoor in order to
monitor the goods anywhere at any time. Yan et al. (2014) developed a new concept of Cloud of Things to facilitate
resources sharing and collaborating between supply chain partners.
Some authors were interested in dening more specically IT enablers for Industry 4.0 and smart factories concepts.
Cheng et al. (2016) presented cyberphysical systems (CPS) to interconnect the physical and cyber world by integrating
analogue/digital hardware and the cloud-based manufacturing (CM) characterised by its high scalability, agility, resource
pooling, virtualisation, ubiquitous access, etc. Lee, Bagheri, and Kao (2015) developed a CPS architecture for manufac-
turing systems. Li (2016) introduced a technological framework of a smart factory in the petrochemical industry. Theo-
rin et al. (2015) developed an event-driven information system architecture for industry 4.0 to enable exible factory
integration and data utilisation. Thoben, Wiesner, and Wuest (2017) indicated that smart manufacturing includes differ-
ent technologies such as cyberphysical production systems (CPPS), IoT, robotics/automation, big data analytics and
cloud computing.
Some other authors dened IoT enablers for particular SCM issues. Tao et al. (2014) designed an IoT-based frame-
work to support the cloud manufacturing with manufacturing resource intelligent perception and access. Gnimpieba
et al. (2015) used different IT enablers to set a framework for a collaborative supply chain describing data storage and
real time event processing with the cloud platform. Kinnunen et al. (2016) discussed the IoT technologies related to data
acquisition in industrial asset management. Karakostas (2013) suggested a Domain Names Server (DNS) architecture
adapted to IoT. Singh and Gupta (2015) discussed the recent trends in intelligent transportation. Sund, Foss, and Bakas
(2011) presented the intelligent goods in the intermodal freight system, which includes technologies for goods identica-
tion, sensors for status monitoring, embedded logic and communication networks. Shih and Wang (2016) developed a
timetemperature indicator (TTI) for controlling the temperature of a cold supply chain using for that an IoT architec-
In addition to IT enablersdenition, some authors raised issues and challenges related to these technologies. Haller,
Karnouskos, and Schroth (2009) identied four main issues: internet scalability, identication and the addressing of bil-
lions of things, heterogeneity of thingsand service paradigms. Bi, Xu, and Wang (2014) and Agrawal and Lal Das
(2011) added security and privacy issues. El Khodr, Shahrestani, and Cheung (2013) raised governance and trust con-
cerns. Finally, Atzori, Iera, and Morabito (2010) suggested paying special attention to resources efciency in terms of
computation and energy capacity besides classical scalability issues.
Overall, we noticed that the main IT enablers are still RFID objects and sensors. Many authors studied the RFID
applications in supply chains. For papers published before 2010, the reader can refer to reviews by Sarac, Absi, and
Dauzère-Pérès (2010), Lim, Bahr, and Leung (2013), Zhu, Mukhopadhyay, and Kurata (2012). More specically, Chang,
Klabjan, and Vossen (2010) proposed a novel approach for RFID optimal deployment in a supply chain network.
Wamba (2012) conducted a study to assess the role of RFID objects as enablers for supply chain integration. In the
International Journal of Production Research 4727
same way, Zelbst et al. (2012) considered the impact of RFID technology on manufacturing and supply chain efciency.
Leung, Cheung, and Chu (2014) studied how to align RFID applications with supply chain strategies.
4.2.2 Source
Sourcing is the process by which rms acquire materials and services. A successful supply chain plans its sourcing
activities strategically across the supply chain. Among the strategic decisions are in-house or outsourcing, supplier selec-
tion and spend management. A supply chain should also carefully consider supplier incentives and partnership develop-
ment programmes. In this section, we report on the literature that looked at IoT impacts on this important supply chain
Verdouw, Beulens, and van der Vorst (2013) argue that IoT enables the virtualisation of supply chains. A virtual con-
trol of supply chains allows the buyer to track and trace goods as they move through the supply chain as well as per-
form advanced quality control and planning. Ng et al. (2015) have proposed a model to integrate data collected from
IoT into strategic planning for product assortments. One interesting idea that was proposed is to allow for product differ-
entiation to be postponed until after delivery to the customer. Yu et al. (2015) studied the impact of IoT on supplier
selection. They recommend the adoption of IoT technologies that would offer higher exibility. Decker et al. (2008)
have identied several benets of IoT in regards to sourcing. While IoT promises to provide valuable real-time visibility
to the supplier (Lou et al. 2011), it comes at a cost. Decker et al. (2008) developed a simple linear cost model to anal-
yse the impact of the cost of sensors and alerts on the unit purchase cost.
4.2.3 Make
A report published by the World Economic Forum in 2012 states that manufacturing has been immensely important to
the prosperity of nations, with over 70% of the income variations of 128 nations explained by differences in manufac-
tured product export data alone(World Economic Forum (WEF) Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (Firm) 2012). Historically,
the evolution of manufacturing is divided into four phases known as industry 1.0 to 4.0. Each of these phases was a
major shift in the manufacturing paradigm. Industry 1.0 was the introduction of mechanical production with the help of
water and steam power. Industry 2.0 was mass production due to division of labour with the help of electrical energy.
Industry 3.0 brought electronics, IT and control systems to the shop oor to further automate production, and now
Industry 4.0 with the help of IoT is promising an unprecedented paradigm shift that will have profound implications on
manufacturing and its supply chain.
Manufacturing companies have been implementing automation systems for decades. However, these systems are
often organised in a hierarchical fashion within data silos. In particular, programmable logic controllers (PLC), and PC-
based controllers and management systems, are largely disconnected from IT and operational systems (Lopez Research
LLC 2014). Security issues being the main reason cited for these legacy structures. However, availability of data-collect-
ing storage and analysis technology (e.g. sensors, controllers, analytics software, telemetry, Big Data and cloud comput-
ing) are providing unprecedented opportunities for smarter manufacturing.
In this review, we focus on the supply chain literature dealing with smart manufacturing and not deal with the litera-
ture focusing mainly on IT aspects. A survey on technologies in an industry 4.0 environment can be found in Lu
(2017). Smart manufacturing enables smarter decisions and more efcient operations through factory and supply chain
visibility based on real-time information. The areas related to the make process that can be enhanced by IoT applications
include: factory visibility, connected supply chain, production planning and scheduling, proactive maintenance, quality
beyond the factory, sustainability and addition to specic applications. Table 5summarises the literature related to these
4.2.4 Deliver
The delivery function is one of the main important tasks of logistics. Logistics involves planning and control of ow
and storage of goods and services (e.g. see Lummus, Krumwiede, and Vokurka 2001). Delivery in the supply chain is
concerned with warehousing, order and inventory management and transportation. In Table 6, we list the major IoT
impacts on the supply chain delivery processes, the technology involved and their literature sources. We note that the
majority of studies focused on transportation, followed by inventory management and warehousing. There is a need for
more studies to look at the impact on order management and the interface between different parties in the supply chain.
A promising area of research is that of quality-controlled logistics (QCL). QCL allows dynamic and real-time quality
control of products as they move through the supply chain (Giannakourou and Taoukis 2003; Dada and Thiesse 2008;
4728 M. Ben-Daya et al.
Jedermann and Lang 2008; Osvald and Stirn 2008; Bowman et al. 2009; Van der Vorst, Kooten, and Luning 2011;
Haass et al. 2015; Lang and Jedermann 2015; Pang et al. 2015; Tadejko 2015; Bogataj, Marija, and Domen 2017; Heis-
ing, Claassen, and Dekker 2017).
Bowman et al. (2009) point to the challenge of having different sensing and measurement standards across the sup-
ply chain. The lack of compatibility between supply chain partnersIoT systems can block large amounts of data and
result in a lost opportunity to use it for predictive modelling and decision-making. Sund, Foss, and Bakas (2011) looked
at IoT adoption for intermodal shipping and its potential for facilitating information sharing between different modes.
Verdouw, Beulens, and van der Vorst (2013) propose a conceptual framework for the use of IoT in supply chains. They
argue that IoT enables the virtualisation of supply chains. Yan et al. (2014) proposed a framework for using IoT data to
Table 5. Literature summary for main areas of Make processes.
Factory visibility
Visibility and traceability framework Wang, Zhang, and Zang (2016)
Ubiquitous manufacturing Chen and Tsai (2017)
Connected supply chain
Collaboration mechanisms Schuh et al. (2014)
Management of innovative production networks Veza, Mladineo, and Gjeldum (2015)
Highly modular multi-vendor production lines Weyer et al. (2015)
Smart design and production control Zawadzki and Żywicki (2016)
Production planning and scheduling
Systematic design of the virtual factory Choi, Kim, and Noh (2015)
IoT-based production performance measurement system Hwang et al. (2016)
A real-time production performance analysis Zhang et al. (2014,2016)
Supply chain performance measurement approach Dweekat, Hwang, and Park (2017)
Real-time scheduling Ivanov et al. (2016)
Industry 4.0 elements and the lean approach Kolberg and Zühlke (2015)
Predictive manufacturing systems Lee et al. (2013)
Intelligent products for decentralised monitoring and control Meyer, Wortmann, and Szirbik (2011)
Big data analytics for RFID logistics data Zhong et al. (2015)
Smart city production system and supply chain design Kumar et al. (2016)
Proactive maintenance
Autonomous maintenance Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, Saniuk, and Nowicki (2017)
IoT for prognostics and systems health management
Predictive maintenance using data mining and smart algorithms Kwon et al. (2016)
Remote monitoring and diagnosis of machines in real time Chukwuekwe et al. (2016)
Computing and visualisation technologies in maintenance Alexandru et al. (2015)
Application of data-driven analytics to maintenance Roy et al. (2016)
Platform for real-time and automatic maintenance cloud orders ODonovan et al. (2015)
RFID technology to improve pipe inspection Yamato, Hiroki, and Fukumoto (2016)
RFID value in the maintenance of aircraft El Ghazali, Lefebvre, and Lefebvre (2013)
Maintenance organisations in the context of industry 4.0 Ngai et al. (2014)
IoT impact on productservice systems Bokrantz et al. (2017)
Predictive maintenance in accordance with industry 4.0 Rymaszewska, Helo, and Gunasekaran (2017)
Maintenance in digitalised manufacturing Spendla et al. (2017), Bokrantz et al. (2017)
Quality beyond the factory
Smart objects and quality management functions Putnik et al. (2015)
Zero defects by applying automatic virtual metrology Cheng et al. (2016)
Challenges of Industry 4.0 for quality management Foidl and Felderer (2016)
Quality management in product recovery using IoT Ondemir and Gupta (2014)
Information management for supply chain quality management Xu (2011)
Opportunities for sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0 Stock and Seliger (2016)
IoT-enabled system in green supply chain Chen (2015)
Customisation of mass-produced parts and Industry 4.0 Gaub (2016)
RFID system for the manufacturing and assembly of crankshafts Velandia et al. (2016)
Smart factory in the petrochemical industry Li (2016)
International Journal of Production Research 4729
Table 6. IoT impact on supply chain delivery process.
Delivery function IoT impact IoT technology Source
Warehousing Enabler of Joint Ordering Time savings
in the order of 81 to 99%
Smart things RFID
Lou et al. (2011), Chen, Cheng, and Huang
(2013a), Chen et al. (2013b), Choy, Ho, and
Lee (2017)
More than 1000% savings in processing
RFID Tags and
Temperature sensors
Yan et al. (2014)
Collaborative warehousing Smart things and
multi-agent systems
Reaidy, Gunasekaran, and Spalanzani (2015)
Warehouse and yard management Smart things Tadejko (2015), Alyahya, Wang, and Bennett
Safety and security Smart things and
Trab et al. (2015)
Order management Information sharing EPCglobal Bowman et al. (2009) Qiu et al. (2015)
Inventory Management Enabler of VMI through real time
Smart things Lou et al. (2011)
Inventory shrinkage RFID tags Dai and Tseng (2012), Fan et al. (2014,
Inventory misplacement RFID tags Fan et al. (2015), Mathaba et al. (2017)
Shelf replenishment RFID tags Condea, Thiesse, and Fleisch (2012), Metzger
et al. (2013)
Inventory accuracy and out-of-stocks RFID tags Goyal et al. (2016), Cui et al. (2017), Qu
et al. (2017)
Transportation Positive benets to shipper, receiver
and customer, with higher benets
going to shipper
Wireless networks Decker et al. (2008)
Autonomous decision-making Sensor Networks Jedermann and Lang (2008)
Product condition Sensor-enabled RFID
Bowman et al. (2009)
Quality monitoring, real-time
responsiveness and price optimisation
Sensor Networks Ferreira, Martinho, and Domingos (2010)
Visibility, theft reduction Smart items, multi-
agent systems
Hribernik et al. (2010), Qu et al. (2017)
Real-time visibility and joint shipping Smart things Lou et al. (2011)
Intermodal shipping Smart containers Sund, Foss, and Bakas (2011), Harris, Wang,
and Wang (2015)
Rerouting based on quality level Sensors, information
fusion and cloud
Pang et al. (2015)
Accurate and timely delivery Sensor-enabled RFID
Xu, Yang, and Yang (2013), Kong et al.
(2016), Yao (2017)
More than 300% savings in scanning
and recording times
RFID tags and
Yan et al. (2014)
Fleet management, dynamic route
Smart things Tadejko (2015), Haass et al. (2015)
Quality control Time-Temperature
Indicator wireless
Giannakourou and Taoukis (2003), Dada and
Thiesse (2008), Shih and Wang (2016)
Quality-controlled logistics Smart packaging Bogataj, Marija, and Domen (2017), Haass
et al. (2015), Heising, Claassen, and Dekker
4730 M. Ben-Daya et al.
exchange locations information using smartphones. Tadejko (2015) discussed the application of IoT for end-to-end visi-
bility allowing for real-time monitoring, timely decisions and reducing delays. Qiu et al. (2015) discussed how IoT
could aid in information sharing to allow for synchronisation between production and transportation. Alyahya, Wang,
and Bennett (2016) have proposed a method for programming automated guided vehicles to autonomously store RFID-
tagged items within warehouses.
In Table 7, we report on the potential impact of IoT on the supply chain decisions and models under the delivery
We note that most studies have focused on production, inventory and order management as well as vehicle routing
decisions and models. In particular, there is a lack of studies that look at IoT long-term impact and models in the area
of facility and supply network design as well as transportation mode selection.
4.2.5 Return
Long before the emergence of IoT, Thierry et al. (1995) suggested putting sensors in products to record information dur-
ing their life cycles to make logistics decisions. However, the idea was not promoted at that time due to technology and
cost limitations. With the introduction of RFID in supply chain management, researchers started looking at its potential
application in reverse logistics. Zhiduan (2005) suggested building an information-sharing platform for electronic waste
recovery supply chain through electronic product code. Kiritsis (2011) introduced the idea of intelligent products and
their important role in product lifecycle management. Martínez-Sala et al. (2009) proposed a solution that tracks a
returnable ecological system for packaging, transport, storage and display of products over the entire supply chain.
Nativi and Lee (2012) study a manufacturer and two suppliers, one of whom is a material recycler, supply chain.
They use simulation and nd that using RFID increases environmental benets and returns. Gu and Liu (2013) looked
at the IoT application in the reverse logistics information management. Kiritsis (2011) modelled a closed loop product
lifecycle management (PLM) using the smart product concept. The author integrated active product tracking product-em-
bedded information device (PEID) information, PLM agent (e.g. mobile reader) and PLM system (PLM DB). Parry
et al. (2016) conducted a study to demonstrate how the IoT may be operationalised to capture data on a consumers use
of products and the implications for reverse supply chains.
Paksoy et al. (2016) proposed a closed-loop supply chain model for meeting the demand of a sales and collection
centre using both new and remanufactured products. The proposed model makes use of lifecycle information, which is
monitored and collected using IoT technology. Xing et al. (2011) provided a design of an e-reverse logistics framework.
IoT technology is used to keep product lifecycle integrity. Fang et al. (2016) proposed an integrated three-stage model
based on IoT technology for the optimisation of procurement, production and product recovery, pricing and strategy of
return acquisition.
Thürer et al. (2016) proposed the architecture of an IoT-driven Kanban system for solid waste collection. The pro-
posed framework overcomes the difculties of applying a Kanban system in this context due to a large number of col-
lection points and geographical distances.
4.2.6 Special supply chains
In this section, we cover the literature dealing with applications in specic areas. In particular, many papers appeared
recently dealing with IoT application in the food supply chain. First, we overview three studies of general nature and
then we summarise, in Table 8, the literature that focused on specic areas of the food supply chain.
Table 7. IoT impact on supply chain delivery decisions and models.
IoT Impact
Production, inventory & order
management Transportation
Role Location Capacity Production Frequency
stock Availability
Routing and
Condition XX
Tracking X X X X X
Costing X X X X
Pricing X X X X
Dynamic Optimisation X X
International Journal of Production Research 4731
Sundmaeker et al. (2016) discussed the envisaged Internet of food and farm in the year 2020. It is a path for
research and technological development to develop innovative solutions that will help to feed the global population and
to reduce emissions and resource usage. It can also help consumers to make an informed decision when selecting speci-
c produce. Pang et al. (2015) presented a value-centric businesstechnology joint design framework. Identied benets
Table 8. Literature relating to specic applications in the food supply chain.
Application area Sources
Information sharing Yan et al. (2016), Chen (2017), Grunow and Piramuthu (2013), Bibi et al. (2017), Lorite et al. (2017),
Condition monitoring Bowman et al. (2009), Jedermann et al. (2014), Badia-Melis et al. (2015), Shih and Wang (2016),
Food safety Liu et al. (2016), Gautam et al. (2017), Wang and Yue (2017),
Virtual supply chains Verdouw, Beulens, and van der Vorst (2013), Verdouw et al. (2016)
Table 9. Role of IoT in supply chain management.
Process Role of IoT Impact References
Source Link with sub-tier
More visibility in supply chain, improve quality
and reduce lead time
Verdouw, Beulens, and van der Vorst (2013)
Real-time progress
and inspection data
from vendor
Better quality at lower cost Bowman et al. (2009)
Supply chain data
Strategic planning for suppliers selection and
product assortment and differentiation
Ng et al. (2015), Yu et al. (2015)
Make Visibility on more
parts and raw
Reduce lead time and costs Wang, Zhang, and Zang (2016)
Combine product and
after sales service
Increase revenue Rymaszewska, Helo, and Gunasekaran (2017)
Real-time quality and
maintenance data from
Improve product design and time to market Putnik et al. (2015)
Ondemir and Gupta (2014)
Remote preventative
Increase product life and customer satisfaction Chukwuekwe et al. (2016)
Deliver Inventory tracking,
information sharing
and joint ordering
Signicant time savings and real-time visibility;
efcient use of space and resources; collaborative
warehousing; timely delivery, increase inventory
accuracy and reduce shrinkage and misplacement
Bowman et al. (2009), Lou et al. (2011), Chen,
Cheng, and Huang (2013a), Chen et al. (2013b),
Yan et al. (2014), Reaidy, Gunasekaran, and
Spalanzani (2015), Qiu et al. (2015), Choy, Ho,
and Lee (2017)
Autonomous decision-
Saves time, space and money Jedermann and Lang (2008), Hribernik et al.
(2010), Dai and Tseng (2012), Xu, Yang, and Yang
(2013), Condea, Thiesse, and Fleisch (2012),
Metzger et al. (2013), Fan et al. (2014,2015),
Haass et al. (2015), Tadejko (2015), Goyal et al.
(2016), Kong et al. (2016), Mathaba et al. (2017),
Cui et al. (2017), Qu et al. (2017), Yao (2017)
Quality monitoring
and quality-controlled
Improve quality standards and reduce waste Dada and Thiesse (2008), Bowman et al. (2009),
Ferreira, Martinho, and Domingos (2010), Sund,
Foss, and Bakas (2011), Giannakourou and
Taoukis (2003), Harris, Wang, and Wang (2015),
Pang et al. (2015), Shih and Wang (2016)
Return Enhances reverse
Reduce costs Gu and Liu (2013), Kiritsis (2011)
Reduce lead time Xing et al. (2011)
More traceability Reduce costs Parry et al. (2016)
Increase customer satisfactionCapturing product
data while in use
4732 M. Ben-Daya et al.
included shelf life prediction, sales premium, precision agriculture and reduction of assurance cost. They provided exam-
ples about acceleration data processing, self-learning shelf-life prediction and real-time supply chain re-planning. Lang
and Jedermann (2015) presented a review of key enabling technologies for the food supply chain. In particular, they dis-
cussed the impact of sensor networks on food logistics. Noletto et al. (2017) looked at the Brazilian food supply chains
current technological state and their receptivity to the Intelligent Packaging and IoT technologies adoption and noted
that cost and the lack of knowledge of these technologies are the greatest barriers. Kaloxylos et al. (2013) discussed
how information management in the agri-food sector would take place under a highly heterogeneous group of actors
and services, based on the EU Smart Agri-Food project.
4.2.7 Other applications
Publications reporting IoT applications in various areas include pharmaceutical supply chain (Datta 2016; Papert,
Rimpler, and Paum 2016), retail industry (Vlachos 2014; Shin and Eksioglu 2015; Thiesse and Buckel 2015;
Nowodzinski, Łukasik, and Puto 2016; Balaji and Roy 2017), construction industry ( Shin et al. 2011; Demiralp, Guven,
and Ergen 2012; Dave et al. 2016; Zhong et al. 2017) and petrochemical industry (Li (2016)), among other applications.
5. Discussion
In this section, we provide a number of observations regarding the application of IoT in supply chain management and
identify the gaps in the literature with respect to the potential of IoT in helping address supply chain management chal-
Despite the strong interest in the IoT issue due to its huge potential and disruptive nature, applications that address
supply chain challenges are still in their early stages. As mentioned in the introduction, IoT offers unprecedented visibil-
ity into all aspects of the supply chain, providing early warnings of internal and external situations that require remedia-
tion. Therefore, IoT enables rms to respond quickly to changes through effective internal operations and collaboration
with suppliers and customers. Current solutions and applications are still short of unlocking this potential. We only have
piecemeal applications in isolated areas with limited work that addresses the entire supply chain, as evidenced by the lit-
erature network analysis in Figure 2.
Based on our classication of the literature by supply chain processes, we found that studies are still conned to iso-
lated areas of the supply chain. Most of the research activities are in two of the supply chain processes, namely make
and deliver. In fact, there are logical explanations for this.
The roots of IoT in logistics are not new. Using technology for the tracking of objects has been around for decades
through various forms of information and communication technologies. Therefore, improvements brought by IoT to the
logistics function can be viewed as a continuation to previous developments. The basic logistics functions are to trans-
port the right goods in the right quantity and right quality at the right time to the right place for the right price(Decker
et al. 2008). Product identication through RFID informs the system about the right goods. Tracing allows the detection
of when items are lost and guarantees the right quantities. Location tracking guarantees the right place aspect. Monitor-
ing the product state ensures the right quality. This information provides the necessary visibility that allows responsive-
ness to unforeseen events and taking action at the right time and the optimisation of the whole process.
Similarly, the roots of IoT in manufacturing go back to the 80s with various forms of automation, robotics, com-
puter-integrated manufacturing and computer-aided manufacturing. What was computer-based then is now web-based in
addition to smart objects capable of machine-to-machine communication and decision-making. What is now smart man-
ufacturing and industry 4.0 is building on these early developments. This explains the high research activities in the
makesupply chain process. This can also be explained by several aspects of the makeprocess that can be enhanced
with IoT applications such as quality, maintenance and several aspects of internal integration as mentioned in Sec-
tion 4.2.3.
Another area of great interest to both researchers and practitioners is the applications of IoT in the food supply
chain. The food supply chain is an extremely challenging domain from a management perspective as it deals with per-
ishable products and involves many actors along the chain. One-third of the food produced worldwide is lost or wasted
according to the FAO (Gustavsson et al. 2011;FAO2013). Stuart (2009) estimates that in North America and Europe,
3050% of the food supply is discarded. In addition, food supply chains are an integral part of every economy that can-
not be offshored. Thus, preventing avoidable food waste generation, food safety and efciency throughout the food sup-
ply chain is a compelling potential of the application of IoT and explains the growing interest in this particular area. We
expect that research in this area will continue to grow.
International Journal of Production Research 4733
Although we did not focus on the technology aspects of IoT in our review, it is worth noting that there is a lot of
research in the technology area whether software or hardware for understandable reasons since technology is the main
enabler of IoT. This can be seen from the many reviews and surveys that appeared in the literature (Atzori, Iera, and
Morabito 2010; Miorandi et al. 2012; Xu, He, and Li 2014; Li, Xu, and Zhao 2015; Whitmore, Agarwal, and Xu 2015;
Dey et al. 2016; Mishra et al. 2016; Ng and Wakenshaw 2017).
Based on our literature review, we summarise the role and impact of IoT on major supply chain processes in Table 9.
We include the four major SCOR processes: source, make, deliver and return. We list the role that IoT plays for each
process as well as the impact and the corresponding references.
There are several gaps in the current literature dealing with IoT applications in SCM that can be identied from the
current review. These gaps can be summarised as follows:
Lack of solid frameworks that provide guidance of IoT adoption in a supply chain context with clear guidelines
and a roadmap. These would help in advising companies as to which process and where in the supply chain would
they deploy IoT, given that supply chain partners may be at different stages of the IoT implementation. In addi-
tion, these frameworks would provide help with change management practices within the company and across the
supply chain.
Lack of models that address supply chain problems in an IoT environment. Management of smart supply chains is
different from that of traditional supply chains. Decision-making in an IoT context requires new tools and models
that take into account this new environment, such as the abundance of big data generated from sensors and con-
nected things. IoT will affect procurement, production planning, the management of inventory, quality and mainte-
nance, among other issues.
There are several barriers to the implementation of IoT in SCM from both technological and managerial perspec-
tives. A world where all things are connected opens the door for less security and privacy (Tadejko 2015). This is
especially true in a supply chain context where information sharing has always been a big challenge. Another
challenge is interoperability. Research by McKinsey suggests that 40% of the value of the IoT will need to be
unlocked via interoperability (Manyika et al. 2015). There is not much research addressing how to deal effectively
with these challenges.
6. Conclusion and future research directions
In this paper, we provided an account of the latest developments in the application of IoT to various supply chain pro-
cesses and areas of supply chain management. As such, we explored IoT in an SCM context, presented its main technol-
ogy enablers and provided an IoT denition in an SCM context. We organised IoT applications around key supply
chain processes. We provided a bibliometric analysis of a representative body of literature up to mid-2017. We identied
the gaps in the literature with respect to the potential of IoT role in helping address supply chain management chal-
lenges. The aim is to provide an informative overview of the latest development in this emerging and growing area,
which is of interest to both researchers and practitioners.
We conclude this paper by pointing out several possible venues for future research. Below we describe some possi-
bilities, with a focus on modelling and optimisation in different application area:
Maintenance: Two research questions are relevant in the area of maintenance. First, what is the optimal placement
of sensors and alert initiation? Second, with the predominance of smartitems what is the optimal scheduling of
autonomous repair operations? Other interesting topics include looking at optimal inspection under discrete moni-
toring sensors and condition-based maintenance analytics (Bowman et al. 2009). Finally, an important research
topic is exception analytics: How do we decide an exception is serious enough to take a certain action?
Virtual Network Flow Design and Optimisation: Virtualisation of supply chains is making it possible to decouple
physical ow from coordination and planning (e.g. Verdouw, Beulens, and van der Vorst 2013). It thus becomes a
challenge to optimise ow in virtual supply networks that dynamically change their conguration depending on
the state of the physical supply chain system.
Costing: An important question for rms is the costing of IoT technology. For example, how to best determine the
economic and ecological value of sensor information (Bowman et al. 2009)?
Vehicle routing: Real-time tracking and re-optimisation of routing and schedules will be a daily reality in the IoT
age. For example, how to re-optimise routes in humanitarian logistics, where some routes/truck may be interdicted,
or in food supply chains, where products could be rerouted based on their quality level, as alluded to by Pang
et al. (2015)?
4734 M. Ben-Daya et al.
Quality-controlled logistics: Quality-controlled logistics for perishable goods that incorporates decisions from sup-
pliers to issue replacement shipments, engineers to perform corrections (Bowman et al. 2009, p 19) as well as the
possibility of customers looking for an alternative source. As in Heising, Claassen, and Dekker (2017), an interest-
ing question is looking at joint optimal quality and pricing in food supply chain logistics where expiry dates may
be dynamic. An important application is in perishable goods monitoring analytics (Bowman et al. 2009) that looks
at both supply and demand aspects. For the supply of perishable products, we would consider the material compo-
sition, physical changes, environmental factors (such as temperature, humidity, gas concentrations and shock) and
chemical reactions. For demand, we would take into account several measures such as aesthetic appearance, tex-
ture, avour and nutritional value.
The authors are grateful to four reviewers for their careful reading of the paper and their valuable feedback.
Disclosure statement
No potential conict of interest was reported by the authors.
This work was supported by American University of Sharjah; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Agrawal, S., and M. Lal Das. 2011.Internet of Things A Paradigm Shift of Future Internet Applications.In 2011 Nirma Univer-
sity International Conference on Engineering. Ahmedabad, India.
Alexandru, A. M., A. De Mauro, M. Fiasche, F. G. Sisca, M. Taisch, L. Fasanotti, and P. Grasseni. 2015.A Smart Web-Based Main-
tenance System for a Smart Manufacturing Environment.In 2015 IEEE 1st International Forum on Research and Technolo-
gies for Society and Industry Leveraging a Better Tomorrow (RTSI). Torino, Italy.
Alyahya, S., Q. Wang, and N. Bennett. 2016.Application and Integration of an RFID-Enabled Warehousing Management System
A Feasibility Study.Journal of Industrial Information Integration 4: 1525.
Angeles, R. 2005.Rd Technologies: Supply-Chain Applications and Implementation Issues.Information Systems Management 22
(1): 5165.
APICS. 2015.Supply Chain Operations Reference Model, Revision 11.0.
Atzori, L., A. Iera, and G. Morabito. 2010.The Internet of Things: A Survey.Computer Networks 54 (15): 27872805.
Badia-Melis, R., L. Ruiz-Garcia, J. Garcia-Hierro, and J. Villalba. 2015.Refrigerated Fruit Storage Monitoring Combining Two Dif-
ferent Wireless Sensing Technologies: RFID and WSN.Sensors 15 (3): 47814795.
Balaji, M. S., and S. K. Roy. 2017.Value Co-Creation with Internet of Things Technology in the Retail Industry.Journal of Mar-
keting Management 33 (12): 731.
Barratt, M., and A. Oke. 2007.Antecedents of Supply Chain Visibility in Retail Supply Chains: A Resource-Based Theory Perspec-
tive.Journal of Operations Management 25 (6): 12171233.
Bi, Z., L. D. Xu, and C. Wang. 2014.Internet of Things for Enterprise Systems of Modern Manufacturing.IEEE Transactions on
Industrial Informatics 10 (2): 15371546.
Bibi, F., C. Guillaume, N. Gontard, and B. Sorli. 2017.A Review: RFID Technology Having Sensing Aptitudes for Food Industry
and Their Contribution to Tracking and Monitoring of Food Products.Trends in Food Science & Technology 62: 91103.
Bogataj, D., B. Marija, and H. Domen. 2017.Mitigating Risks of Perishable Products in the Cyber-Physical Systems Based on the
Extended MRP Model.International Journal of Production Economics 193: 5162.
Bokrantz, J., A. Skoogh, C. Berlin, and J. Stahre. 2017.Maintenance in Digitalised Manufacturing: Delphi-Based Scenarios for
2030.International Journal of Production Economics 191: 154169.
Bonomi, F., R. Milito, J. Zhu, and S. Addepalli. 2012.Fog Computing and Its Role in the Internet of Things.In Proceedings of the
First Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing - MCC 12. Helsinki, Finland.
Bonomi, F., R. Milito, P. Natarajan, and J. Zhu. 2014.Fog Computing: A Platform for Internet of Things and Analytics.In Big
Data and Internet of Things: A Roadmap for Smart Environments, edited by N. Bessis, and C. Dobre, Vol. 546, 169186.
Studies in Computational Intelligence. Cham: Springer.
Borgia, E. 2014.The Internet of Things Vision: Key Features, Applications and Open Issues.Computer Communications 54: 131.
Bowman, P., J. Ng, M. Harisson, T. Sanchez Lopez, and A. Illic. 2009.Sensor Based Condition Monitoring.Building Radio Fre-
quency Identication for the Global Environment (Bridge) Euro RFID Project.
International Journal of Production Research 4735
Butner, K. 2010.The Smarter Supply Chain of the Future.Strategy & Leadership 38 (1): 2231.
Chang, S., D. Klabjan, and T. Vossen. 2010.Optimal Radio Frequency Identication Deployment in a Supply Chain Network.
International Journal of Production Economics 125 (1): 7183.
Chen, R. Y. 2015.Intelligent IoT-Enabled System in Green Supply Chain Using Integrated FCM Method.International Journal of
Business Analytics 2 (3): 4766.
Chen, R. Y. 2017.An Intelligent Value Stream-Based Approach to Collaboration of Food Traceability Cyber Physical System by
Fog Computing.Food Control 71: 124136.
Chen, T., and H. R. Tsai. 2017.Ubiquitous Manufacturing: Current Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities.Robotics and Com-
puter-Integrated Manufacturing 45: 126132.
Chen, J. C., C. H. Cheng, and P. B. Huang. 2013a.Supply Chain Management with Lean Production and RFID Application: A Case
Study.Expert Systems with Applications 40 (9): 33893397.
Chen, J. C., C. H. Cheng, P. B. Huang, K. J. Wang, C. J. Huang, and T. C. Ting. 2013b.Warehouse Management with Lean and
RFID Application: A Case Study.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 69 (14): 531542.
Cheng, F. T., H. Tieng, H. C. Yang, M. H. Hung, Y. C. Lin, C. F. Wei, and Z. Y. Shieh. 2016.Industry 4.1 for Wheel Machining
Automation.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 1 (1): 332339.
Choi, S., B. H. Kim, and S. D. Noh. 2015.A Diagnosis and Evaluation Method for Strategic Planning and Systematic Design of a
Virtual Factory in Smart Manufacturing Systems.International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 16 (6):
Chopra, S., and P. Meindl. 2013.Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Chapter 1, 5th ed. Harlow: Pearson.
Choy, K. L., G. T. S. Ho, and C. K. H. Lee. 2017.A RFID-Based Storage Assignment System for Enhancing the Efciency of
Order Picking.Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 28 (1): 111129.
Christopher, M. 2016.Logistics & Supply Chain Management. Harlow: Pearson.
Christopher, M., and M. Holweg. 2011.“‘Supply Chain 2.0: Managing Supply Chains in the Era of Turbulence.International Jour-
nal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 41 (1): 6382.
Chukwuekwe, D. O., P. Schjølberg, H. Rødseth, and A. Stuber. 2016.Reliable, Robust and Resilient Systems: Towards Development
of a Predictive Maintenance Concept within the Industry 4.0 Environment.EFNMS Euro Maintenance Conference, Athens,
Colicchia, C., and F. Strozzi. 2012.Supply Chain Risk Management: A New Methodology for a Systematic Literature Review.Sup-
ply Chain Management: An International Journal 17 (4): 403418.
Condea, C., F. Thiesse, and E. Fleisch. 2012.RFID-Enabled Shelf Replenishment with Backroom Monitoring in Retail Stores.
Decision Support Systems 52 (4): 839849.
Cui, L., J. Deng, F. Liu, Y. Zhang, and M. Xu. 2017.Investigation of RFID Investment in a Single Retailer Two-Supplier Supply
Chain with Random Demand to Decrease Inventory Inaccuracy.Journal of Cleaner Production 142: 20282044.
Dada, A., and F. Thiesse. 2008.Sensor Applications in the Supply Chain: The Example of Quality-Based Issuing of Perishables.
The Internet of Things Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4952: 140154.
Dai, H., and M. M. Tseng. 2012.The Impacts of RFID Implementation on Reducing Inventory Inaccuracy in a Multi-Stage Supply
Chain.International Journal of Production Economics 139 (2): 634641.
Datta, S. P. A. 2016.Retail Medicine in an Era of IoT and Medical Errors in the Age of Ubiquitous Connectivity.Journal of Inno-
vation Management 4 (3): 36.
Dave, B., S. Kubler, K. Främling, and L. Koskela. 2016.Opportunities for Enhanced Lean Construction Management Using Internet
of Things Standards.Automation in Construction 61: 8697.
Decker, C., M. Berchtold, L. W. F. Chaves, M. Beigl, D. Roehr, T. Riedel, M. Beuster, T. Herzog, and D. Herzig. 2008.Cost-Benet
Model for Smart Items in the Supply Chain.The Internet of Things Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4952: 155172.
Demiralp, G., G. Guven, and E. Ergen. 2012.Analyzing the Benets of RFID Technology for Cost Sharing in Construction Supply
Chains: A Case Study on Prefabricated Precast Components.Automation in Construction 24: 120129.
Dey, S., S. D. Joshi, S. Patil, B. Kumar, and V. A. Kagi. 2016.A Survey of the Internet of Things.IOSR Journal of Computer
Engineering 18 (1): 8085.
Dorsemaine, B., J. P. Gaulier, J. P. Wary, N. Kheir, and P. Urien. 2015.Internet of Things: A Denition & Taxonomy.9th Interna-
tional Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies, Cambridge, UK.
Dweekat, A. J., G. Hwang, and J. Park. 2017.Supply Chain Performance Measurement Approach Using the Internet of
Things.Industrial Management & Data Systems 117 (2): 267286.
El Ghazali, Y., E. Lefebvre, and L. A. Lefebvre. 2013.Intelligent Inspection Processes for Intelligent Maintenance: The Potential of
RFID in the Petroleum Industry.International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2 (4): 93105.
El Khodr, M., S. Shahrestani, and H. Cheung. 2013.The Internet of Things: Vision and Challenges.In TENCON Spring Confer-
ence, 2013 IEEE, April 2013. Sydney, Australia, 218222.
Ellis, S., H. D. Morris, and J. Santagate. 2015.IoT-Enabled Analytic Applications Revolutionize Supply Chain Planning and Execu-
tion.International Data Corporation (IDC) White Paper.
4736 M. Ben-Daya et al.
Fahimnia, B., J. Sarkis, and H. Davarzani. 2015.Green Supply Chain Management: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis.Interna-
tional Journal of Production Economics 162: 101114.
Fan, T. J., X. Y. Chang, C. H. Gu, J. J. Yi, and S. Deng. 2014.Benets of RFID Technology for Reducing Inventory Shrinkage.
International Journal of Production Economics 147: 659665.
Fan, T., F. Tao, S. Deng, and S. Li. 2015.Impact of RFID Technology on Supply Chain Decisions with Inventory Inaccuracies.
International Journal of Production Economics 159: 117125.
Fang, C., X. Liu, P. M. Pardalos, and J. Pei. 2016.Optimization for a Three-Stage Production System in the Internet of Things: Pro-
curement, Production and Product Recovery, and Acquisition.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technol-
ogy 83 (58): 689710.
FAO. 2013.Food Wastage Footprint. Rome: FAO.
Ferreira, P., R. Martinho, and D. Domingos. 2010.IoT-Aware Business Processes for Logistics: Limitations of Current Approaches.
In INForum 2010 II Simposio de Informatica, Braga; 2010, September 910, edited by L. S. Barbosa and M. P. Correia,
Foidl, H., and M. Felderer. 2016.Research Challenges of Industry 4.0 for Quality Management.In Innovations in Enterprise Infor-
mation Systems Management and Engineering Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Munich, Germany, 121137.
Fortino, G., and P. Truno. 2014. Preface of Internet of Things based on Smart Objects: Technology, Middleware and Applications,
edited by G. Fortino and P. Truno. Cham: Springer.
Gaub, H. 2016.Customization of Mass-Produced Parts by Combining Injection Molding and Additive Manufacturing with Industry
4.0 Technologies.Reinforced Plastics 60 (6): 401404.
Gaukler, G. M., R. W. Seifert, and W. H. Hausman. 2007.Item-Level RFID in the Retail Supply Chain.Production and Operations
Management 16 (1): 6576.
Gautam, R., A. Singh, K. Karthik, S. Pandey, F. Scrimgeour, and M. K. Tiwari. 2017.Traceability Using RFID and Its Formulation
for a Kiwifruit Supply Chain.Computers & Industrial Engineering 103: 4658.
Giannakourou, M. C., and P. S. Taoukis. 2003.Application of a TTI-Based Distribution Management System for Quality Optimiza-
tion of Frozen Vegetables at the Consumer End.Journal of Food Science 68 (1): 201209.
Gnimpieba, Z. D. R., A. Nait-Sidi-Moh, D. Durand, and J. Fortin. 2015.Using Internet of Things Technologies for a Collaborative
Supply Chain: Application to Tracking of Pallets and Containers.Procedia Computer Science 56: 550557.
Goyal, S., B. C. Hardgrave, J. A. Aloysius, and N. DeHoratius. 2016.The Effectiveness of RFID in Backroom and Sales Floor
Inventory Management.The International Journal of Logistics Management 27 (3): 795815.
Greengard, S. 2015.The Internet of Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grunow, M., and S. Piramuthu. 2013.RFID in Highly Perishable Food Supply Chains Remaining Shelf Life to Supplant Expiry
Date?International Journal of Production Economics 146 (2): 717727.
Gu, Y., and Q. Liu. 2013.Research on the Application of the Internet of Things in Reverse Logistics Information Management.
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 6 ( 4): 963973.
Gubbi, J., R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami. 2013.Internet of Things (IoT): A Vision, Architectural Elements, and Future
Directions.Future Generation Computer Systems 29 (7): 16451660.
Gustavsson, J., C. Cederberg, U. Sonesson, R. V. Otterdijk, and A. Meybeck. 2011.Global Food Losses and Food Waste,138.
Rome: FAO.
Haass, R., P. Dittmer, M. Veigt, and M. Lütjen. 2015.Reducing Food Losses and Carbon Emission by Using Autonomous Control-a
Simulation Study of the Intelligent Container.International Journal of Production Economics 164: 400408.
Haller, S., S. Karnouskos, and C. Schroth. 2009.The Internet of Things in an Enterprise Context.In Lecture Notes in Computer
Science Future Internet FIS 2008, Vol. 5468, 1428. Berlin, Germany.
Harris, I., Y. Wang, and H. Wang. 2015.ICT in Multimodal Transport and Technological Trends: Unleashing Potential for the
Future.International Journal of Production Economics 159: 88103.
Hassini, E. 2008.Supply Chain Optimization: Current Practices and Overview of Emerging Research Opportunities.INFOR: Infor-
mation Systems and Operational Research 46 (2): 9396.
Heese, H. S. 2007.Inventory Record Inaccuracy, Double Marginalization, and RFID Adoption.Production and Operations Man-
agement 16 (5): 542553.
Heising, J. K., G. D. H. Claassen, and M. Dekker. 2017.Options for Reducing Food Waste by Quality-Controlled Logistics using
Intelligent Packaging along the Supply Chain. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A 34 (10):16721680.
Hribernik, K. A., T. Warden, K. D. Thoben, and O. Herzog. 2010.An Internet of Things for Transport Logisticsan Approach to
Connecting the Information and Material Flows in Autonomous Cooperating Logistics Processes.In Proceedings of the 12th
International MITIP Conference on Information Technology & Innovation Processes of the Enterprises, Aalborg, Denmark,
Hwang, G., J. Lee, J. Park, and T. W. Chang. 2016.Developing Performance Measurement System for Internet of Things and Smart
Factory Environment.International Journal of Production Research 55 (9): 25902602.
Information Society and Media Directorate General of the European Commission (INFSO). 2008.Internet of Things in 2020 - Road-
map for the Future.Accessed August 2017.
International Journal of Production Research 4737
Ivanov, D., A. Dolgui, B. Sokolov, F. Werner, and M. Ivanova. 2016.A Dynamic Model and an Algorithm for Short-Term Supply
Chain Scheduling in the Smart Factory Industry 4.0.International Journal of Production Research 54 (2): 386402.
Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., A. Saniuk, and T. Nowicki. 2017.The Maintenance Management in the Macro-Ergonomics Context.
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing Advances in Social & Occupational Ergonomics 487: 3546.
Jedermann, R., and W. Lang. 2008.The Benets of Embedded Intelligence Tasks and Applications for Ubiquitous Computing in
Logistics.The Internet of Things Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4952: 105122.
Jedermann, R., M. Nicometo, I. Uysal, and W. Lang. 2014.Reducing Food Losses by Intelligent Food Logistics.Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society a: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 372 (2017): 20130302.
Kagermann, H., W. Wahlster, and J. Helbig. 2013.Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0: Final
Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group.Acatech-National Academy of Science and Engineering, Munich, Germany.
Kaloxylos, A., J. Wolfert, T. Verwaart, C. M. Terol, C. Brewster, R. Robbemond, and H. Sundmaker. 2013.The Use of Future Inter-
net Technologies in the Agriculture and Food Sectors: Integrating the Supply Chain.Procedia Technology 8: 5160.
Karakostas, B. 2013.A DNS Architecture for the Internet of Things: A Case Study in Transport Logistics.Procedia Computer
Science 19: 594601.
Kinnunen, S. K., S. Marttonen-Arola, A. Ylä-Kujala, T. Kärri, T. Ahonen, P. Valkokari, and D. Baglee. 2016.Decision Making Situ-
ations Dene Data Requirements in Fleet Asset Management.In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Engineering
Asset Management (WCEAM 2015) Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Tampere, Finland, 357364.
Kiritsis, D. 2011.Closed-Loop PLM for Intelligent Products in the Era of the Internet of Things.Computer-Aided Design 43 (5):
Kolberg, D., and D. Zühlke. 2015.Lean Automation Enabled by Industry 4.0 Technologies.IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 (3): 1870
Kong, X. T. R., J. Chen, H. Luo, and G. Q. Huang. 2016.Scheduling at an Auction Logistics Centre with Physical Internet.Inter-
national Journal of Production Research 54 (9): 26702690.
Kumar, M., G. Graham, P. Hennelly, and J. Srai. 2016.How Will Smart City Production Systems Transform Supply Chain Design:
A Product-Level Investigation.International Journal of Production Research 54 (23): 71817192.
Kwon, D., M. R. Hodkiewicz, J. Fan, T. Shibutani, and M. G. Pecht. 2016.IoT-Based Prognostics and Systems Health Management
for Industrial Applications.IEEE Access 4: 36593670.
Lambert, D. M., and M. C. Cooper. 2000.Issues in Supply Chain Management.Industrial Marketing Management 29 (1): 6583.
Lang, W., and R. Jedermann. 2015.The Intelligent Container - What can MEMS do for Logistics of Food?In Proc. IEEE SEN-
SORS, Busan, Korea, 14.
Lee, I., and K. Lee. 2015.The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, Investments, and Challenges for Enterprises.Business Hori-
zons 58 (4): 431440.
Lee, J., E. Lapira, B. Bagheri, and H. A. Kao. 2013.Recent Advances and Trends in Predictive Manufacturing Systems in Big Data
Environment.Manufacturing Letters 1 (1): 3841.
Lee, J., B. Bagheri, and H. A. Kao. 2015.A Cyber-Physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0-Based Manufacturing Systems.
Manufacturing Letters 3: 1823.
Leung, J., W. Cheung, and S. C. Chu. 2014.Aligning RFID Applications with Supply Chain Strategies.Information & Manage-
ment 51 (2): 260269.
Li, D. 2016.Perspective for Smart Factory in Petrochemical Industry.Computers & Chemical Engineering 91: 136148.
Li, S., L. Xu, X. Wang, and J. Wang. 2012.Integration of Hybrid Wireless Networks in Cloud Services Oriented Enterprise Informa-
tion Systems.Enterprise Information Systems 6 (2): 165187.
Li, S., L. D. Xu, and S. Zhao. 2015.The Internet of Things: A Survey.Information Systems Frontiers 17 (2): 243259.
Liao, Y., F. Deschamps, E. D. F. R. Loures, and L. F. P. Ramos. 2017.Past, Present and Future of Industry 4.0 - a Systematic Litera-
ture Review and Research Agenda Proposal.International Journal of Production Research 55 (12): 36093629.
Lim, M. K., W. Bahr, and S. C. H. Leung. 2013.RFID in the Warehouse: A Literature Analysis (19952010) of Its Applications,
Benets, Challenges and Future Trends.International Journal of Production Economics 145 (1): 409430.
Liu, Y., W. Han, Y. Zhang, L. Li, J. Wang, and L. Zheng. 2016.An Internet-of-Things Solution for Food Safety and Quality Con-
trol: A Pilot Project in China.Journal of Industrial Information Integration 3: 17.
Liu, F., C. W. Tan, E. T. K. Lim, and B. Choi. 2017.Traversing Knowledge Networks: An Algorithmic Historiography of Extant
Literature on the Internet of Things (IoT).Journal of Management Analytics 4 (1): 334.
Lopez Research LLC. 2014.Building Smarter Manufacturing with the Internet of Things (IoT): Part 2 of the IoT Series. San fran-
cisco, CA: Lopez Research LLC.
López, T. S., D. C. Ranasinghe, B. Patkai, and D. McFarlane. 2011.Taxonomy, Technology and Applications of Smart Objects.
Information Systems Frontiers 13 (2): 281300.
Lorite, G. S., T. Selkälä, T. Sipola, J. Palenzuela, E. Jubete, A. Viñuales, G. Cabañero, et al. 2017.Novel, Smart and RFID Assisted
Critical Temperature Indicator for Supply Chain Monitoring.Journal of Food Engineering 193: 2028.
Lou, P., Q. Liu, Z. Zhou, and H. Wang. 2011.Agile Supply Chain Management over the Internet of Things.2011 International
Conference on Management and Service Science.
4738 M. Ben-Daya et al.
Lu, Y. 2017.Industry 4.0: A Survey on Technologies, Applications and Open Research Issues.Journal of Industrial Information
Integration 6: 110.
Lummus, R. R., D. W. Krumwiede, and R. J. Vokurka. 2001.The Relationship of Logistics to Supply Chain Management: Develop-
ing a Common Industry Denition.Industrial Management & Data Systems 101 (8): 426432.
Manyika, J., J. Woetzel, R. Dobbs, M. Chui, P. Bisson, J. Bughin, and D. Aharon. 2015.The Internet of Things: Mapping the Value
Beyond the Hype. McKinsey Global Institute.
M&S Consulting. 2017.Industrial Internet of Things Platform Comparison.Accessed October 5, 2017. https://www.mandsconsult
Martínez-Sala, A. S., E. Egea-López, F. García-Sánchez, and J. García-Haro. 2009.Tracking of Returnable Packaging and Transport
Units with Active RFID in the Grocery Supply Chain.Computers in Industry 60 (3): 161171.
Mathaba, S., M. Adigun, J. Oladosu, and O. Oki. 2017.On the Use of the Internet of Things and Web 2.0 in Inventory Manage-
ment.Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 32 (4): 30913101.
Metzger, C., F. Thiesse, S. Gershwin, and E. Fleisch. 2013.The Impact of False-Negative Reads on the Performance of RFID-Based
Shelf Inventory Control Policies.Computers & Operations Research 40 (7): 18641873.
Meyer, G. G., K. Främling, and J. Holmström. 2009.Intelligent Products: A Survey.Computers in Industry 60 (3): 137148.
Meyer, G. G., J. C. H. Wortmann, and N. B. Szirbik. 2011.Production Monitoring and Control with Intelligent Products.Interna-
tional Journal of Production Research 49 (5): 13031317.
Miorandi, D., S. Sicari, F. De Pellegrini, and I. Chlamtac. 2012.Internet of Things: Vision, Applications and Research Challenges.
Ad Hoc Networks 10 (7): 14971516.
Mishra, D., A. Gunasekaran, S. J. Childe, T. Papadopoulos, R. Dubey, and S. Wamba. 2016.Vision, Applications and Future Chal-
lenges of Internet of Things.Industrial Management & Data Systems 116 (7): 13311355.
Musa, A., and A. A. A. Dabo. 2016.A Review of RFID in Supply Chain Management: 20002015.Global Journal of Flexible
Systems Management 17 (2): 189228.
Naskar, S, P. Basu, and A. K. Sen. 2017.A Literature Review of the Emerging Field of IoT Using RFID and Its Applications in
Supply Chain Management.In The Internet of Things in the Modern Business Environment Advances in E-Business Research,
127. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Nativi, J. J., and S. Lee. 2012.Impact of RFID Information-Sharing Strategies on a Decentralized Supply Chain with Reverse Logis-
tics Operations.International Journal of Production Economics 136 (2): 366377.
Ng, I. C. L., and S. Wakenshaw. 2017.The Internet-of-Things: Review and Research Directions.International Journal of Research
in Marketing 34 (1): 321.
Ng, I., K. Scharf, G. Pogrebna, and R. Maull. 2015.Contextual Variety, Internet-of-Things and the Choice of Tailoring over Plat-
form: Mass Customisation Strategy in Supply Chain Management.International Journal of Production Economics 159: 76
Ngai, E. W. T., B. K. S. Cheung, S. S. Lam, and C. T. Ng. 2014.RFID Value in Aircraft Parts Supply Chains: A Case Study.Inter-
national Journal of Production Economics 147: 330339.
Noletto, A. P. R., S. A. Loureiro, R. B. Castro, and O. F. L. Júnior. 2017.Intelligent Packaging and the Internet of Things in Brazil-
ian Food Supply Chains: The Current State and Challenges.In Dynamics in Logistics. Lecture Notes in Logistics, edited by
M. Freitag, H. Kotzab, and J. Pannekm, 173183. Cham: Springer.
Nowodzinski, P., K. Łukasik, and A. Puto. 2016.Internet of Things (IoT) in a Retail Environment. the New Strategy for Firms
Development.European Scientic Journal, ESJ 12 (10): 332341.
ODonovan, P., K. Leahy, K. Bruton, and D. T. J. OSullivan. 2015.An Industrial Big Data Pipeline for Data-Driven Analytics
Maintenance Applications in Large-Scale Smart Manufacturing Facilities.Journal of Big Data 2 (1): 126.
Ondemir, O., and S. M. Gupta. 2014.Quality Management in Product Recovery Using the Internet of Things: An Optimization
Approach.Computers in Industry 65 (3): 491504.
Osvald, A., and L. Z. Stirn. 2008.A Vehicle Routing Algorithm for the Distribution of Fresh Vegetables and Similar Perishable
Food.Journal of Food Engineering 85 (2): 285295.
Paksoy, T., I. Karaoglan, H. Gökçen, P. Pardalos, and B. Torgul. 2016.An Experimental Research on Closed Loop Supply Chain
Management with Internet of Things.Journal of Economics Bibliography 3 (1S): 120.
Pang, Z., Q. Chen, W. Han, and L. Zheng. 2015.Value-Centric Design of the Internet-of-Things Solution for Food Supply Chain:
Value Creation, Sensor Portfolio and Information Fusion.Information Systems Frontiers 17 (2): 289319.
Papert, M., P. Rimpler, and A. Paum. 2016.Enhancing Supply Chain Visibility in a Pharmaceutical Supply Chain.International
Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 46 (9): 859884.
Parry, G. C., S. A. Brax, R. S. Maull, and I. C. L. Ng. 2016.Operationalising IoT for Reverse Supply: The Development of Use-
Visibility Measures.Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 21 (2): 228244.
Persson, O., R. Danell and J. W. Schneider. 2009.How to Use Bibexcel for Various Types of Bibliometric Analysis.Celebrating
Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday 5: 924.
Postcapes. 2017.IoT Standards and Protocols.Accessed September 28, 2017.
International Journal of Production Research 4739
Putnik, G., L. R. Varela, C. Carvalho, C. Alves, V. Shah, H. Castro, and P. Ávila. 2015.Smart Objects Embedded Production and
Quality Management Functions.International Journal for Quality Research 9 (1): 151166.
Qiu, X., H. Luo, G. Xu, R. Zhong, and G. Q. Huang. 2015.Physical Assets and Service Sharing for IoT-Enabled Supply Hub in
Industrial Park (SHIP).International Journal of Production Economics 159: 415.
Qu, T., M. Thürer, J. Wang, Z. Wang, H. Fu, C. Li, and G. Q. Huang. 2017.System Dynamics Analysis for an Internet-of-Things-
Enabled Production Logistics System.International Journal of Production Research 55 (9): 26222649.
Rayes, A., and S. Salam. 2016.The Things in IoT: Sensors and Actuators.In Internet of Things From Hype to Reality. Cham:
Reaidy, P. J., A. Gunasekaran, and A. Spalanzani. 2015.Bottom-up Approach Based on Internet of Things for Order Fulllment in a
Collaborative Warehousing Environment.International Journal of Production Economics 159: 2940.
Ross, D. F. 2016.Introduction to Supply Chain Management Technologies. Boca Raton, FL: St Lucie Press.
Roy, R., R. Stark, K. Tracht, S. Takata, and M. Mori. 2016.Continuous Maintenance and the Future Foundations and Technologi-
cal Challenges.CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology 65 (2): 667688.
Rymaszewska, A., P. Helo, and A. Gunasekaran. 2017.IoT Powered Servitization of Manufacturing An Exploratory Case Study.
International Journal of Production Economics 192: 92105.
Sarac, A., N. Absi, and S. Dauzère-Pérès. 2010.A Literature Review on the Impact of RFID Technologies on Supply Chain Man-
agement.International Journal of Production Economics 128 (1): 7795.
Schuh, G., T. Potente, C. Wesch-Potente, A. R. Weber, and J. P. Prote. 2014.Collaboration Mechanisms to Increase Productivity in
the Context of Industrie 4.0.Procedia CIRP 19: 5156.
Shih, C. W., and C. H. Wang. 2016.Integrating Wireless Sensor Networks with Statistical Quality Control to Develop a Cold Chain
System in Food Industries.Computer Standards & Interfaces 45: 6278.
Shin, S., and B. Eksioglu. 2015.An Empirical Study of RFID Productivity in the U.S. Retail Supply Chain.International Journal
of Production Economics 163: 8996.
Shin, T. H., S. Chin, S. W. Yoon, and S. W. Kwon. 2011.A Service-Oriented Integrated Information Framework for RFID/WSN-
Based Intelligent Construction Supply Chain Management.Automation in Construction 20 (6): 706715.
Simchi-Levi, D., P. Kaminsky, and E. S. Levi. 2003.Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies, and Case
Studies. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Singh, B., and A. Gupta. 2015.Recent Trends in Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Review.Journal of Transport Literature 9
(2): 3034.
Spendla, L., M. Kebisek, P. Tanuska, and L. Hrcka. 2017.Concept of Predictive Maintenance of Production Systems in Accordance
with Industry 4.0.2017 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI), Her-
lany, Slovakia.
Srivastava, S. K. 2007.Green Supply-Chain Management: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review.International Journal of Manage-
ment Reviews 9 (1): 5380.
Stock, T., and G. Seliger. 2016.Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0.Procedia CIRP 40: 536541.
Strozzi, F., C. Colicchia, A. Creazza, and C. Noè. 2017.Literature Review on the Smart FactoryConcept Using Bibliometric
Tools.International Journal of Production Research 11: 120.
Stuart, T. 2009.Waste. Uncovering the Global Food Scandal. London: Penguin.
Sund, A. B., T. Foss, and O. Bakas. 2011.Intelligent Goods in the Intermodal Freight System.European Transport Conference
2011, Glasgow, Scotland.
Sundmaeker, H., C. Verdouw, S. Wolfert, and L. P. Freire. 2016.Internet of Food and Farm 2020.In Digitising the Industry-Inter-
net of Things Connecting Physical, Digital and Virtual Worlds, 129151. Gistrup/Delft: River Publishers.
Tadejko, P. 2015.Application of Internet of Things in LogisticsCurrent Challenges.Economics and Management 7 (4): 5464.
Tajima, M. 2007.Strategic Value of RFID in Supply Chain Management.Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 13 (4):
Tao, F., Z. Ying, L. D. Xu, and L. Zhang. 2014.IoT-Based Intelligent Perception and Access of Manufacturing Resource toward
Cloud Manufacturing.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 10 (2): 15471557.
Theorin, A., K. Bengtsson, J. Provost, M. Lieder, C. Johnsson, T. Lundholm, and B. Lennartson. 2015.An Event-Driven Manufac-
turing Information System Architecture.IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 (3): 547554.
Thierry, M., M. Salomon, J. V. Nunen, and L. V. Wassenhove. 1995.Strategic Issues in Product Recovery Management.California
Management Review 37 (2): 114136.
Thiesse, F., and T. Buckel. 2015.A Comparison of RFID-Based Shelf Replenishment Policies in Retail Stores under Suboptimal
Read Rates.International Journal of Production Economics 159: 126136.
Thoben, K. D., S. Wiesner, and T. Wuest. 2017.“‘Industrie 4.0and Smart Manufacturing A Review of Research Issues and Appli-
cation Examples.International Journal of Automation Technology 11 (1): 416.
Thürer, M., Y. H. Pan, T. Qu, H. Luo, C. D. Li, and G. Q. Huang. 2016.Internet of Things (IoT) Driven Kanban System for Rev-
erse Logistics: Solid Waste Collection.Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 110. doi:10.1007/s10845-016-1278-y.
Trab, S., E. Bajic, A. Zouinkhi, M. N. Abdelkrim, H. Chekir, and R. Hadj-Ltaief. 2015.Product Allocation Planning with Safety
Compatibility Constraints in IoT-Based Warehouse.Procedia Computer Science 73: 290297.
4740 M. Ben-Daya et al.
Traneld, D., D. Denyer, and P. Smart. 2003.Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge
by Means of Systematic Review.British Journal of Management 14 (3): 207222.
Vachon, S., and R. D. Klassen. 2008.Environmental Management and Manufacturing Performance: The Role of Collaboration in
the Supply Chain.International Journal of Production Economics 111 (2): 299315.
Vachon, S., and Z. Mao. 2008.Linking Supply Chain Strength to Sustainable Development: A Country-Level Analysis.Journal of
Cleaner Production 16 (15): 15521560.
Van der Vorst, J. G. A. J., O. Kooten, and P. A. Luning. 2011.Towards a Diagnostic Instrument to Identify Improvement Opportuni-
ties for Quality Controlled Logistics in Agrifood Supply Chain Networks.International Journal on Food System Dynamics 2
(1): 94105.
Velandia, D. M. S., N. Kaur, W. G. Whittow, P. P. Conway, and A. A. West. 2016.Towards Industrial Internet of Things: Crankshaft
Monitoring, Traceability and Tracking Using RFID.Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 41: 6677.
Verdouw, C. N., A. J. M. Beulens, and J. G. A. J. van der Vorst. 2013.Virtualisation of Floricultural Supply Chains: A Review from
an Internet of Things Perspective.Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 99: 160175.
Verdouw, C. N., J. Wolfert, A. J. M. Beulens, and A. Rialland. 2016.Virtualization of Food Supply Chains with the Internet of
Things.Journal of Food Engineering 176: 128136.
Veza, I., M. Mladineo, and N. Gjeldum. 2015.Managing Innovative Production Network of Smart Factories.IFAC-PapersOnLine
48 (3): 555560.
Vlachos, I. P. 2014.A Hierarchical Model of the Impact of RFID Practices on Retail Supply Chain Performance.Expert Systems
with Applications 41 (1): 515.
Wamba, S. F. 2012.Achieving Supply Chain Integration Using RFID Technology.Business Process Management Journal 18 (1):
Wang, T., Y. F. Zhang, and D. X. Zang. 2016.Real-Time Visibility and Traceability Framework for Discrete Manufacturing Shop-
oor.In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2015,
Singapore, 763772.
Wang, J., and H. Yue. 2017.Food Safety Pre-Warning System Based on Data Mining for a Sustainable Food Supply Chain.Food
Control 73: 223229.
Weyer, S., M. Schmitt, M. Ohmer, and D. Gorecky. 2015.Towards Industry 4.0 Standardization as the Crucial Challenge for
Highly Modular, Multi-Vendor Production Systems.IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 (3): 579584.
Whitmore, A., A. Agarwal, and L. D. Xu. 2015.The Internet of Things-a Survey of Topics and Trends.Information Systems Fron-
tiers 17 (2): 261274.
Wollschlaeger, M., T. Sauter, and J. Jasperneite. 2017.The Future of Industrial Communication: Automation Networks in the Era of
the Internet of Things and Industry 4.0.IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine 11 (1): 1727.
World Economic Forum (WEF) Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (Firm). 2012.The Future of Manufacturing: Opportunities to Drive Eco-
nomic Growth. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Xing, B., W. J. Gao, K. Battle, F. V. Nelwamondo, and T. Marwala. 2011.E-RL: The Internet of Things Supported Reverse Logis-
tics for Remanufacture-to-Order.Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Advanced Engineering Computing and
Applications in Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal.
Xu, L. D. 2011.Information Architecture for Supply Chain Quality Management.International Journal of Production Research 49
(1): 183198.
Xu, R., L. Yang, and S. H. Yang. 2013.Architecture Design of Internet of Things in Logistics Management for Emergency
Response.2013 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Internet of Things and
IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, Beijing, China.
Xu, L. D., W. He, and S. Li. 2014.Internet of Things in Industries: A Survey.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 10 (4):
Yamato, Y., K. Hiroki, and Y. Fukumoto. 2016.Proposal of Lambda Architecture Adoption for Real Time Predictive Maintenance.
2016 Fourth International Symposium on Computing and Networking (CANDAR), Hiroshima, Japan.
Yan, J., S. Xin, Q. Liu, W. Xu, L. Yang, L. Fan, B. Chen, and Q. Wang. 2014.Intelligent Supply Chain Integration and Manage-
ment Based on Cloud of Things.International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 10 (3): 624839.
Yan, B., C. Yan, C. Ke, and X. Tan. 2016.Information Sharing in Supply Chain of Agricultural Products Based on the Internet of
Things.Industrial Management & Data Systems 116 (7): 13971416.
Yao, J. 2017.Optimisation of One-Stop Delivery Scheduling in Online Shopping Based on the Physical Internet.International
Journal of Production Research 55 (2): 358376.
Yu, J., N. Subramanian, K. Ning, and D. Edwards. 2015.Product Delivery Service Provider Selection and Customer Satisfaction in
the Era of Internet of Things: A Chinese E-RetailersPerspective.International Journal of Production Economics 159: 104
Yuvaraj, S. and M. Sangeetha. 2016.Smart Supply Chain Management Using Internet of Things (IoT) and Low Power Wireless
Communication Systems.2016 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking
(WiSPNET), Chennai, India.
International Journal of Production Research 4741
Zawadzki, P., and K. Żywicki. 2016.Smart Product Design and Production Control for Effective Mass Customization in the Industry
4.0 Concept.Management and Production Engineering Review 7 (3): 105112.
Zelbst, P. J., K. W. Green, V. E. Sower, and P. M. Reyes. 2012.Impact of RFID on Manufacturing Effectiveness and Efciency.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management 32 (3): 329350.
Zhang, Y., W. Wang, S. Liu, and G. Xie. 2014.Real-Time Shop-Floor Production Performance Analysis Method for the Internet of
Manufacturing Things.Advances in Mechanical Engineering 6: 270749.
Zhang, Y., W. Wang, N. Wu, and C. Qian. 2016.IoT-Enabled Real-Time Production Performance Analysis and Exception Diagnosis
Model.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 13 (3): 13181332.
Zhiduan, X. 2005.Research on the Flexibility in Logistic Systems.Chinese Journal of Management 4: 441445.
Zhong, R. Y., C. Xu, C. Chen, and G. Q. Huang. 2015.Big Data Analytics for Physical Internet-Based Intelligent Manufacturing
Shop Floors.International Journal of Production Research 55 (9): 26102621.
Zhong, R. Y., Y. Peng, F. Xue, J. Fang, W. Zou, H. Luo, S. T. Ng, W. Lu, G. Q. P. Shen, and G. Q. Huang. 2017.Prefabricated
Construction Enabled by the Internet-of-Things.Automation in Construction 76: 5970.
Zhou, K., T. Liu, and L. Zhou. 2015.Industry 4.0: Towards Future Industrial Opportunities and Challenges.In Proceedings of
2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), Zhangjiajie, China, 21472152.
Zhu, Q., and J. Sarkis. 2004.Relationships between Operational Practices and Performance among Early Adopters of Green Supply
Chain Management Practices in Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises.Journal of Operations Management 22 (3): 265289.
Zhu, X., S. K. Mukhopadhyay, and H. Kurata. 2012.A Review of RFID Technology and Its Managerial Applications in Different
Industries.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 29 (1): 152167.
4742 M. Ben-Daya et al.
... One of the relevant supporting technologies for health care is the Internet of Things (IoT), which can be viewed as a connected network of physical objects that sense, monitor, and interact with each other within a company, as well as between companies in a supply chain, to foster effective supply chain management [10]. As IoT creates the possibility to collect, process, and analyze large quantities of real-time data [11], it enables rapid and efficient information sharing [12][13][14], the creation of a more flexible supply chain [15], and increased levels of visibility throughout the supply chain, thereby strengthening the ability to deal with disruptions [10,[16][17][18][19]. Consequently, IoT can aid in building a more resilient supply chain [20][21][22][23]. ...
... One of the relevant supporting technologies for health care is the Internet of Things (IoT), which can be viewed as a connected network of physical objects that sense, monitor, and interact with each other within a company, as well as between companies in a supply chain, to foster effective supply chain management [10]. As IoT creates the possibility to collect, process, and analyze large quantities of real-time data [11], it enables rapid and efficient information sharing [12][13][14], the creation of a more flexible supply chain [15], and increased levels of visibility throughout the supply chain, thereby strengthening the ability to deal with disruptions [10,[16][17][18][19]. Consequently, IoT can aid in building a more resilient supply chain [20][21][22][23]. ...
... As IoT creates the possibility to collect, process, and analyze large quantities of real-time data [11], it enables rapid and efficient information sharing [12][13][14], the creation of a more flexible supply chain [15], and increased levels of visibility throughout the supply chain, thereby strengthening the ability to deal with disruptions [10,[16][17][18][19]. Consequently, IoT can aid in building a more resilient supply chain [20][21][22][23]. For instance, IoT can be deployed to establish links with lower-tier vendors or to automate inventory management, resulting in greater responsiveness and better capacity utilization [10,24]. Even though supply chain management is often seen as a supporting process in the health care industry, logistics and supply chain management are responsible for a significant proportion of health care delivery costs [25,26]. ...
Full-text available
Background Over the past 2 years, the COVID-19 pandemic has placed enormous pressure on the health care industry. There has been an increase in demand and, at the same time, a shortage of supplies. This has shown that supply chain management in the health care industry cannot be taken for granted. Furthermore, the health care industry is also facing other major challenges, such as the current labor market shortage. In the literature, the Internet of Things (IoT) is highlighted as an effective tool to build a more resilient and efficient supply chain that can manage these challenges. Although using IoT in supply chain management has been extensively examined in other types of supply chains, its use in the health care supply chain has largely been overlooked. Given that the health care supply chain, compared to others, is more complex and is under growing pressure, a more in-depth understanding of the opportunities brought by IoT is necessary. Objective This study aims to address this research gap by identifying and ranking the drivers of and barriers to implementing IoT in the health care supply chain. Methods We conducted a 2-stage study. In the first, exploratory stage, a total of 12 semistructured interviews were conducted to identify drivers and barriers. In the second, confirmatory stage, a total of 26 health care supply chain professionals were asked in a survey to rank the drivers and barriers. ResultsThe results show that there are multiple financial, operational, strategy-related, and supply chain-related drivers for implementing IoT. Similarly, there are various financial, strategy-related, supply chain-related, technology-related, and user-related barriers. The findings also show that supply chain-related drivers (eg, increased transparency, traceability, and collaboration with suppliers) are the strongest drivers, while financial barriers (eg, high implementation costs and difficulties in building a business case) are the biggest barriers to overcome. Conclusions The findings of this study add to the limited literature regarding IoT in the health care supply chain by empirically identifying the most important drivers and barriers to IoT implementation. The ranking of drivers and barriers provides guidance for practitioners and health care provider leaders intending to implement IoT in the health care supply chain.
... According to Jarrahi (2018), BDA and artificial intelligence (AI) work effectively together to handle complicated decisionmaking. Furthermore, big data could be used to automate non-routine cognitive tasks (Frey and Osborne, 2017;Gautam et al., 2017;Ben-Daya et al., 2019). Roberts and Hazen (2016) emphasized the redesign of SC by fusing aspects of big data technology, process and people. ...
... The initiation stage, the acceptance stage with unstructured data and rich analysis, the adaptation stage with rich data and bad analytics and the routinization stage were the four stages that were taken into consideration. The major categories of absorptive capacity, sustainability performances and SC innovation for the firm were intended to be gathered in a proposed framework (Rodriguez and Da Cunha, 2018;Kumar et al., 2020b;Ben-Daya et al., 2019;Sharma et al., 2021b). BDA's capacity to attain sustainability and the ability of organizations to gain a competitive edge in a fast-moving market. ...
... Consumers may trace items back to the whole SC, which offers crucial details regarding handling, processing, packaging and shipping up to the procuring level (Tagarakis et al., 2021;Al-Khatib, 2022a). Information about customers was generated by the BDA's ability to record and transmit real-time data across the SC, which helped businesses improve their goods and services (Chanchaichujit et al., 2020;Ben-Daya et al., 2019). BDA technology is likely to increase the trustworthiness of decision-making and actual data sharing across supply chain participants when employed in a value chain. ...
Purpose Despite the current progress in realizing how Big Data Analytics can considerably enhance the Sustainable Manufacturing Supply Chain (SMSC), there is a major gap in the storyline relating factors of Big Data operations in managing information and trust among several operations of SMSC. This study attempts to fill this gap by studying the key enablers of using Big Data in SMSC operations obtained from the internet of Things (IoT) devices, group behavior parameters, social networks and ecosystem framework. Design/methodology/approach Adaptive Prospects (Improving SC performance, combating counterfeits, Productivity, Transparency, Security and Safety, Asset Management and Communication) are the constructs that this research first conceptualizes, defines and then evaluates in studying Big Data Analytics based operations in SMSC considering best worst method (BWM) technique. Findings To begin, two situations are explored one with Big Data Analytics and the other without are addressed using empirical studies. Second, Big Data deployment in addressing MSC barriers and synergistic role in achieving the goals of SMSC is analyzed. The study identifies lesser encounters of barriers and higher benefits of big data analytics in the SMSC scenario. Research limitations/implications The research outcome revealed that to handle operations efficiently a 360-degree view of suppliers, distributors and logistics providers' information and trust is essential. Practical implications In the Post-COVID scenario, the supply chain practitioners may use the supply chain partner's data to develop resiliency and achieve sustainability. Originality/value The unique value that this study adds to the research is, it links the data, trust and sustainability aspects of the Manufacturing Supply Chain (MSC).
... This analysis is more suitable for use when the scope of the study is broad, and the dataset is too large to be reviewed manually (Donthu et al., 2021). This analysis has been successfully used to identify trends, key contributors, as well as patterns and research directions in several fields, such as the use of IoT in supply chain management (Ben-Daya et al., 2019), food safety in the context of climate change (Sweileh, 2020), and the use of drones in agriculture (Rejeb et al., 2022). Based on a bibliometric analysis of 166 publications screened from 2008 to 2017, Ben-Daya et al. (2019) explored IoT applications in supply chain management. ...
... This analysis has been successfully used to identify trends, key contributors, as well as patterns and research directions in several fields, such as the use of IoT in supply chain management (Ben-Daya et al., 2019), food safety in the context of climate change (Sweileh, 2020), and the use of drones in agriculture (Rejeb et al., 2022). Based on a bibliometric analysis of 166 publications screened from 2008 to 2017, Ben-Daya et al. (2019) explored IoT applications in supply chain management. They succeeded in identifying gaps in the literature regarding the potential role of IoT in addressing supply chain management challenges. ...
Full-text available
Postharvest is a vital stage in agricultural production which is prone to causing losses due to improper implementation. Using a microcontroller that allows automation and increased precision in the postharvest process will likely reduce costs and potential losses. This research conducted a bibliometric study on applying microcontrollers in postharvest systems in Scopus-indexed publications from 2003 to 2022. The aim was to reveal microcontroller developments, evaluate current research topics, and discuss future challenges facing microcontroller applications in postharvest systems. First, this paper presents a bibliometric review of the role of microcontrollers in postharvest. Second, co-citation, coupling, and cluster analysis methods were used to analyze collaboration networks, and VOSviewer was used to visualize these networks. Third, Biblioshiny was used to analyze thematic trends of microcontroller applications. Finally, the paper discusses the challenges of using microcontrollers and provides suggestions for overcoming them. The results show that institutions from China and Italy lead research production in this field, with globally popular studies focusing primarily on fruit, digital storage, moisture determination, and cost. In addition, the thematic evolution of keywords indicating response time, cost, and design reliability issues have become basic and emerging topics in microcontroller application research for postharvest systems in recent years.
... The growth of I4.0 and the transformation of industries have been identified as being understudied in policy or industrial development research [27]. Ben-Daya et al. concentrate on the implementation challenge of several IoT technologies in the context of I4.0 on supply chains [28]. Jayashree et al. addressed I4.0 implementation and sustainability impacts and evaluated the roles of IT structure, top management, and supply chain integration, the latter having relatively lower effects [29]. ...
Full-text available
In line with the fourth industrial revolution, most countries have imposed a variety of regulations or policies for the goals of energy conservation, sustainable development, and industrial transition. Renewable energy production and its production process, which is widely discussed, especially in the context of sustainable energy, has become more important with Industry 4.0. This paper tested the relation among economic growth, renewable electricity generations (% of GDP), Industry 4.0, industrial structure, trade openness, financial development, and research and development expenditure for G20 countries in 2000–2021 by employing a panel quantile regression approach and various panel cointegration tests in addition to investigation of panel Granger causality among the analyzed variables. The variables of industrial structure, trade openness, and financial development were selected as control variables. Since this study is the first study on this topic, it will contribute to the development of the literature by providing resources for future studies about I4.0, renewable energy production, and economic growth. Furthermore, this study will not only contribute to the literature by revealing the theoretical and empirical relationship between these variables but will also shed light on the policies that G20 countries will produce in this regard. According to results, all variables examined have significant causal effects: unidirectional causality from economic growth to Industry 4.0, to research and development, and to renewable energy output and, also, from research and development to renewable energy output. Bidirectional causality and feedback effects between renewable energy and Industry 4.0 are determined. Further, unidirectional causality from industrial structure, from openness to trade, and from financial development to renewable energy output are determined. Results indicate renewable-enhancing effects of Industry 4.0.
... Many uses of BT have been identified in the literature, including healthcare management [14], the energy sector [15,16], and digital government [17]. Additionally, SC network management has been identified as an enabler for BT, with most of the research focusing on four main themes: trust [18], trade [19], IoT [20], and traceability [1]. In spite of the potential advantages of SC integration with blockchain, barriers to adoption remain a significant challenge, including technological challenges, inadequate standards and trustworthiness, and interoperability [21]. ...
Full-text available
This study investigates the challenges in implementing blockchain technology (BT) in sustainable supply chain management (SSC). The study thoroughly analyzes the literature and expert opinions on BT, SCM, and sustainability. A total of 24 barriers are identified, categorized into the Internet of Things, strategic, supply chain, legislation, and external factors. The findings are evaluated using the Integrated Fuzzy TOPSIS–ISM tool. The results indicate that barriers related to the supply chain have the most significant impact on the adoption of BT in SSC. The study also reveals the interrelation among sub-barriers within the supply chain, providing valuable insights to improve adoption. Finally, a strategic action plan based on a fishbone diagram is provided to reduce the effects of supply chain barriers. This study provides a theoretical foundation for using BT to achieve long-term supply chain goals.
Full-text available
The oil and gas industry is a significant player in the energy transition to fuel growth. The industry faces growing anxiety about the energy transition implication for their operations and contributions to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Digital innovations and adopting digital technologies are crucial to strengthening the industry's economic stability. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies are emerging as answers that could streamline downstream oil and gas value chains by cutting costs and emissions and significantly impacting the entire ecosystem. In the Indian Oil and gas industry, IoT adoption is negligible from a downstream perspective. Given the increasing role of technology downstream, IoT adoption is needed for sustainable operation and revenue maximization.
Full-text available
The paper aims to identify the main research (threads and) trends and evaluate the relationships between (and the impact of) the publications/articles investigating the interplays between artificial intelligence (AI) and sustainability against a business or management related context. To reach this objective, 863 articles from Web of Science Core Collection were analyzed, using VOSviewer as a bibliometric tool. Performance analysis was employed to mainly explore the interest and popularity of the topic, assess the main interest areas and fields of both the sources and the publications, determine the most relevant SDGs for the topic, and identify the most popular journals hosting articles in the analyzed field. Science mapping was carried out to identify the most influential articles in the field, understand the antecedent topics/ideas (in the fields of AI and sustainability, respectively) contributing to the emergence of a new interest area at the intersection between AI and sustainability, appraise the current developments in the analyzed interest area, and discover new trends / areas for future research.
The objective of this study is to find new options for the promotion of intermodality, based on short sea shipping, as applied to perishable products. At present, most of the transport is carried out by refrigerated trucks. In theory, this change would have positive effects on the environment and could even reduce transit costs, but companies are still hesitant to implement this practice. In this context, the present study aims to determine whether there are aspects other than operational considerations (e.g., time, cost, quality or environmental concerns) that condition modal shift. First, a literature review is conducted which attempts to identify both the strengths and weaknesses of intermodality in perishable transport. This review serves as the basis for the elaboration of a questionnaire targeting transport actors within the fruit and vegetable supply chain in southeastern Spain – the area taken as an application example. Next, the survey is used to determine the possible drivers that would favor a modal shift applying a structural equation analysis, corroborated with a traditional econometric model. As a result, the design of an overall strategy based on the creation of redistribution hubs at destination (i.e., located at ports), whose operations could be optimized through the digitization of the supply chain, appears to be a promising approach.
Full-text available
Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojisi hızla gelişmekte ve bulut bilişim, Nesnelerin İnterneti, büyük veri analitiği ve yapay zekâ gibi birçok yıkıcı teknoloji ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu teknolojiler üretim endüstrisine nüfuz etmekte ve endüstriyel üretimin dördüncü aşamasının (yani Endüstri 4.0) gelişini belirleyen siber-fiziksel sistemler (CPS) aracılığıyla fiziksel ve sanal dünyaların kaynaşmasını sağlamaktadır. CPS’nin üretim ortamlarında yaygın olarak uygulanması, üretim sistemlerini giderek daha akıllı hale getirmektedir. Endüstri 4.0’ın üretim endüstrisinde uygulanmasına ilişkin araştırmaları ilerletmek için bu çalışmada, ilk olarak, Endüstri 4.0 için kavramsal bir çerçeve sunulmuştur. İkinci olarak, bu çerçevede sunulan ön uç teknolojiler ile ilgili örnek senaryolar açıklanmıştır. Buna ek olarak, Endüstri 4.0 temel teknolojileri ve bunların Endüstri 4.0 akıllı üretim sistemlerine yönelik olası uygulamaları gözden geçirilmiştir. Son olarak, zorluklar ve gelecek perspektifleri belirlenmiş ve tartışılmıştır.
Full-text available
Digital diffusion in healthcare is poised to usher delivery of care in integration with software as a service to the edge. Time compression due to the latter may catalyze the convergence between "sense and response" in a manner which may enhance quality of service (QoS) or quality of care at the point of contact (PoC). Digital transformation is likely to influence the broad spectrum of instances ranging from high acuity patients to preventive care scenarios. Access to healthcare for individuals before they become patients may eventually lead to improved health and reduced healthcare cost.
Conference Paper
Freight systems involve activities and actors from many different sectors in the field of logistics and transport. Information exchanged between the actors is often based on manual updating and handling of information. Implementation of intelligent goods, where the goods finds the most efficient way through the supply chain, will enable seamless interconnectivity between actors and activities in the intermodal freight system. Intelligent goods will make more effective transfer and provide a basis for improved collaboration between the actors in the logistics network, make intermodal transport more reliable and further create a potential for improving efficiency through better information quality. Based on a literature review and interaction with industrial partners within the freight and logistics domain, the paper is oriented towards adoption and development of intelligent goods in multimodal freight systems. Collaboration have been made with a large number of organizations involving representatives from rail operators, forwarders, freight customers, transport authorities and suppliers of IT related equipment. By on-site registration and through interviews with the freight customer and the freight forwarder some challenges with intermodal freight were identified. The paper reports on some of the findings from the INTRANS project focusing on how intelligent goods may support and enable seamless interconnectivity between the actors and activities in the transport systems including the terminal, make more effective container transfer in the intermodal transport network, provide a basis for improved collaboration between the actors in the logistics network and make intermodal transport more reliable from the sender to the receiver.
The Internet of Things (IoT) envisions an ecosystem where smart and interconnected objects can sense surrounding changes, communicate with each other, process information and take active roles in decision making. Optimizing supply chain performance is a primary concern of manufacturing and logistics organizations. Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is helping organizations to build automated and interconnected smart environment by object identification and tracking, motivating the first step towards an IoT-enabled world. This chapter attempts to understand extant literature studying applications of RFID in implementing the IoT in supply chain management. We categorize extant literature, firstly, based on research methodology and secondly, based on supply chain processes. We find that presently academic activity is around conceptualizing the usability of RFID in the IoT with limited analytical and empirical evidence. Supply chain processes such as demand planning, procurement, retail shelf space management and product returns are prospective areas for interesting future research.
ThisvolumecontainstheproceedingsoftheInternetofThings(IOT)Conference 2008, the ?rst international conference of its kind. The conference took place in Zurich,Switzerland, March26–28,2008. The term ‘Internet of Things’ hascome to describe a number of technologies and researchdisciplines that enable the - ternet to reach out into the real world of physical objects. Technologies such as RFID, short-range wireless communications, real-time localization, and sensor networks are becoming increasingly common, bringing the ‘Internet of Things’ into industrial, commercial, and domestic use. IOT 2008 brought together le- ing researchersand practitioners, from both academia and industry, to facilitate the sharing of ideas, applications, and research results. IOT 2008 attracted 92 high-quality submissions, from which the technical program committee accepted 23 papers, resulting in a competitive 25% acc- tance rate. In total, there were over 250 individual authors from 23 countries, representing both academic and industrial organizations. Papers were selected solely on the quality of their blind peer reviews. We were fortunate to draw on the combined experience of our 59 program committee members, coming from the most prestigious universities and research labs in Europe, North America, Asia, and Australia. Program committee members were aided by no less than 63 external reviewers in this rigorous process, in which each committee member wrote about 6 reviews. The total of 336 entered reviews resulted in an average of 3. 7 reviews per paper, or slightly more than 1000 words of feedback for each paper submitted.
This book reports on cutting-edge research related to social and occupational factors. It presents innovative contributions to the optimization of sociotechnical management systems, which consider organizational, policy, and logistical issues. It discusses timely topics related to communication, crew resource management, work design, participatory design, as well as teamwork, community ergonomics, cooperative work, and warning systems. Moreover, it reports on new work paradigms, organizational cultures, virtual organizations, telework, and quality management. The book reports on cutting-edge infrastructures implemented for different purposes such as urban, health, and enterprise. It discusses the growing role of automated systems and presents innovative solutions addressing the needs of special populations. Based on the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Social and Occupational Ergonomics, held on July 27-31 in Walt Disney World®, Florida, USA, the book provides readers with a comprehensive view of the current challenges in both organizational and occupational ergonomics, highlighting key connections between them and underlining the importance of emotional factors in influencing human performance.
The Internet of Things (IoT) usually refers to a world-wide network of interconnected heterogeneous objects (sensors, actuators, smart devices, smart objects, RFID, embedded computers, etc) uniquely addressable, based on standard communication protocols. Beyond such a definition, it is emerging a new definition of IoT seen as a loosely coupled, decentralized system of cooperating smart objects (SOs). A SO is an autonomous, physical digital object augmented with sensing/actuating, processing, storing, and networking capabilities. SOs are able to sense/actuate, store, and interpret information created within themselves and around the neighbouring external world where they are situated, act on their own, cooperate with each other, and exchange information with other kinds of electronic devices and human users. However, such SO-oriented IoT raises many in-the-small and in-the-large issues involving SO programming, IoT system architecture/middleware and methods/methodologies for the development of SO-based applications. This Book will specifically focus on exploring recent advances in architectures, algorithms, and applications for an Internet of Things based on Smart Objects. Topics appropriate for this Book include, but are not necessarily limited to: - Methods for SO development - IoT Networking - Middleware for SOs - Data Management for SOs - Service-oriented SOs - Agent-oriented SOs - Applications of SOs in Smart Environments: Smart Cities, Smart Health, Smart Buildings, etc. Advanced IoT Projects. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014. All rights reserved.
In the supply chain of fresh fruit and vegetables, large losses may incurred throughout the whole farm to fork route. Food supply chain management is faced with challenges of minimizing the post-harvest loss, while delivering the items directly to the refrigerators in smart homes (i.e. domotics). A substantial value can therefore be added to the criterion function by an immediate, real-time detection of changes in perishability dynamics, including a real-time calculation and communication of the remaining shelf life during transportation from one chain node to another. The changes in the estimated remaining shelf life can, therefore, be matched with the expected remaining transportation time, and so the critical moment can be avoided with a given probability. This can be done by dynamic rerouting in real time, based on previous net present value (NPV) criteria. Such criteria could then we include in the contractually stipulated remaining shelf life requirements at the delivery point.