ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Sexting motivations during adolescence are related to developmental dimensions-such as sexual identity and body-image development-or harmful intentions-such as aggression among peers and partners. Sociocultural and media models can affect explorations of sexuality and redefini-tions of body image, which in turn are related to sexting behaviors and motivations. In this study, we investigated the roles of body-esteem attribution, the internalization of media models, and body objectification as predictors of three sexting motivations: sexual purposes, body-image reinforcement, and instrumental/aggravated reasons. The participants were 190 Italian adolescents aged from 13 to 20 years old (M age = 17.4, SD age = 1.8; 44.7% females). Sexual purposes were predicted by body-esteem attribution and body objectification; body-image reinforcement was predicted by the internalization of media models, and instrumental/aggravated reasons were not predicted by any variable. Thus, only sexual purposes and body-image reinforcement appeared to be affected by body-image concerns due to media models.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Adolescence
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/adolescence
Sexting as the mirror on the wall: Body-esteem attribution, media
models, and objectied-body consciousness
Dora Bianchi
a,
, Mara Morelli
b
, Roberto Baiocco
a
, Antonio Chirumbolo
a
a
Department of Developmental & Social Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
b
Department of Human and Social Science, Université de la Vallée d'Aoste, Italy
ARTICLE INFO
Keywords:
Sexting motivations
Body esteem
Media models
Objectied-body consciousness
Adolescents
ABSTRACT
Sexting motivations during adolescence are related to developmental dimensionssuch as sexual
identity and body-image developmentor harmful intentionssuch as aggression among peers
and partners. Sociocultural and media models can aect explorations of sexuality and redeni-
tions of body image, which in turn are related to sexting behaviors and motivations. In this study,
we investigated the roles of body-esteem attribution, the internalization of media models, and
body objectication as predictors of three sexting motivations: sexual purposes, body-image
reinforcement, and instrumental/aggravated reasons. The participants were 190 Italian adoles-
cents aged from 13 to 20 years old (M
age
= 17.4, SD
age
= 1.8; 44.7% females). Sexual purposes
were predicted by body-esteem attribution and body objectication; body-image reinforcement
was predicted by the internalization of media models, and instrumental/aggravated reasons were
not predicted by any variable. Thus, only sexual purposes and body-image reinforcement ap-
peared to be aected by body-image concerns due to media models.
1. Sexting behaviors and motivations
During the last decade, new technologies and media-based communications have provided a new way for managing social in-
teractions and intimate relationships. Smartphones, the Internet, and social networks can also be vehicles for exploring and ex-
pressing sexuality. Dened by Chalfen (2009) as the exchange of sexually suggestive and provocative contents via smartphones, the
Internet, or social networks, sexting appears to be very common among young people (Dir, Coskunpinar, Steiner, & Cyders, 2013;
Morelli, Bianchi, Baiocco, Pezzuti, & Chirumbolo, 2016a). The prevalence of sexting behaviors increases with the spread of new
technologies. The rst surveys on adolescents found the percentages of sexting to be between 20% and 33% (Eurispes & Telefono
Azzurro, 2012; National Campaign & Cosmogirl, 2008). A more recent study (Morelli et al., 2016a) found higher percenta-
gesdistinguishing between receiving sexts (78%), privately sending sexts (73%), and publicly posting sexts (9%).
We conceived the present study in line with a developmental interpretation proposed by the psychological literature on ado-
lescents' sexting (Levine, 2013). According to this perspective, sexting is now a normal expression of sexuality through new tech-
nologies (Bianchi, Morelli, Baiocco, & Chirumbolo, 2016), and it is just one of the new methods that media-based communications
have provided for facing some of adolescents' normative and developmental tasks (Šmahel & Subrahmanyam, 2014).
Studies on sexting motivations (Siibak, 2009; Vanden Abeele, Campbell, Eggermont, & Roe, 2014) have revealed the need for
acceptance and popularity among peers. This need also has a relevant role in facing adolescent developmental tasks related to
identity construction, new interest in sexuality, and the redenition of body image (Blos, 1979; Erikson, 1970). All of these
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.10.006
Received 15 December 2016; Received in revised form 16 October 2017; Accepted 19 October 2017
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: dora.bianchi@uniroma1.it (D. Bianchi).
Journal of Adolescence 61 (2017) 164–172
0140-1971/ © 2017 The Foundation for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
MARK
developmental tasks contribute to identity redenition through social comparisons with peers (Festinger, 1954; Suls,
Martin, & Wheeler, 2002). Indeed, the most frequently reported motivation for sexting during adolescence has been related to
achieving sexual and social aims (such as irting, initiating sexual activity, capturing attention, arousing a potential partner as
foreplay, having fun, joking, achieving popularity, and imitating friends), which are two key developmental tasks during adolescence
(Lenhart, 2009). Furthermore, some recent studies (Bianchi, Morelli, Baiocco, & Chirumbolo, 2017; Bianchi et al., 2016; Chalfen,
2009; Henderson & Morgan, 2011; Siibak, 2009) have found that sexting can work as a form of self-expression underlying body-image
redenition. Thus, all of these sexting motivations relate to important developmental tasks that adolescents have to manage, sup-
porting a normative interpretation of sexting behaviors (Levine, 2013). More specically, online self-presentations appear to be
frequently used by adolescents to express and explore their developing identities (Schmitt, Dayanim, & Matthias, 2008; Walrave,
Heirman, & Hallam, 2014; Šmahel & Subrahmanyam, 2014).
On the other hand, the literature (Drouin, Ross, & Tobin, 2015) has also underlined the presence of more harmful motivations that
go beyond sexuality itself and seem to hide aggressive aspectssuch as being pressured by partners and friends; embarrassing
someone, being aggressive, and seeking revenge among partners. There are also secondary aims of sexting, such as to receive gifts or
telephone recharges (AP-MTV, 2009; Bianchi et al., 2016; Eurispes &Telefono Azzurro, 2012). These sexting motivations are related
to a problematic and deviant facet of sexting behaviors. Several studies (Morelli, Bianchi, Baiocco, Pezzuti, & Chirumbolo, 2016b,
2016a; Vanden Abeele et al., 2014; Walrave et al., 2014) have found that sexting can be a vehicle for relational violence among peers
and in dating relationships, becoming a new kind of gendered sexual harassment (Walker, Sanci, & Temple-Smith, 2013). The lack of
direct feedback and nonverbal communicationthe disinhibition eect, as dened by Suler (2004)can facilitate young people's
expressions of aggression in online environments. Furthermore, the false sense of privacy provided by the online dimension can
facilitate the perpetration of violence (Walrave et al., 2014) and can explain the exploitation of sexual contents for the obtainment of
some rewards. This instrumental use of sexting as an exchange of favors is based on a power imbalance between partners and peers,
representing a source of pressure to engage in sexting. Gibson (2016) suggested that, in line with the social exchange theory (Cook,
Cheshire, Rice, & Nakagawa, 2013), this power imbalance leads to a limitation of sexual freedom because providing sexual favors
involves a feeling of obligation in spite of spontaneous self-disclosure (Emmers-Sommers et al., 2010).
We have demonstrated in our work that the abovementioned sexting motivations can be summarized in a three-factor mod-
elcomposed of sexual motivations (related to the expression and exploration of sexuality among peers and between romantic
partners), body-image reinforcement (sharing sexts to look for a feedback from peers about body adequacy), and instrumental/
aggravated reasons (the exploitation of sexual contents for relational aggression or the obtainment of something else) (Bianchi et al.,
2016). These three motivational areas can be conceived in the framework of motivational systems that guide individual behavior, as
theorized by Lichtenberg (2013). Thus, instrumental/aggravated motivations are related to aggravated (harmful) sexting behaviors
whereas the previous motivations (sexual aims and body-image reinforcement) are an expression of experimental (developmental and
normative) sexting, as suggested by a study on the legal implications of sexting (Wolak, Finkelhor, & Mitchell, 2012).
1.1. Sociocultural correlates of sexting motivations
As suggested by Walrave et al. (2014), the willingness to engage in sexting is inuenced by not only intraindividual factors but
also extra individual factorssuch as perceived social pressure and subjective norms, shaped by peer groups' approval. Recently, the
social cognitive theory (SCT; Bandura, 2001)has also been applied to study the eects of media contents on individual cognitive
processes. According to the SCT, social behaviors and cognitive processes are shaped in interactions with the social environment. As
stated by van Oosten and Vandenbosch (2017) and in line with the SCT (Bandura, 2001), the individuals' observations of peers and
media models could inuence their attitudes and beliefs on a specic behavior; could shape their thoughts, aects, and actions; and
consequently, could aect both behaviors and cognitions.
Within this theoretical framework, sexting behaviors and motivations are closely linked to other social contexts including peers
and the media. According to Ringrose, Gill, Livingstone, and Harvey (2012), sexting can be interpreted as an expression of a sex-
ualized culture which implies the sexual objectication of bodies through the sexualized images and models proposed in mainstream
media. Moreover, the sexual objectication of bodies also leads to early sexual debut (Lerum & Dworkin, 2009; Pearson, Kholodkov,
Henson, & Impett, 2012). Previous studies (Schick et al., 2010; Woertman & van den Brink, 2012) have also found that body sa-
tisfaction and body self-esteem, both in general and in sexual contexts, were indexes of normal and adaptive sexual functioning in
adolescents.
Literature described body objectication as the internalization of an external gaze on one's body and the evaluation of the body as
an object that needs to adapt to sociocultural standards (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997; McKinley & Hyde, 1996). Some individuals
who are more sensitive to sociocultural and media models perceive higher pressure from these standards, leading to a higher ob-
jectied-body consciousness (McKinley & Hyde, 1996). The objectied-body consciousness was dened by McKinley and Hyde
(1996) as tendencies to consider one's body as an object under others' evaluation and to believe that one's body should conform to
sociocultural standards. According to McKinley and Hyde (1996) this phenomenon is characterized by perceived shame and sur-
veillance about own body, and by beliefs of control about appearance. During adolescence, people are more likely to develop body
self-objectication because it arises from pubertal changes and increased peer attention (Lindberg, Grabe, & Hyde, 2007). There are
high levels of body objectication in young people with a history of peer sexual harassment, which undermined their value as sexual
partners and constituted a rst experience of sexual objectication (Lindberg et al., 2007). Girls have been considered more sensitive
than boys to body objectication due to sociocultural pressure to adapt to idealized models of beauty and thinness (Grabe,
Hyde, & Lindberg, 2007; Tiggemann & Kuring, 2004). However, a recent study (Daniel & Bridges, 2010) found that boys are also
D. Bianchi et al. Journal of Adolescence 61 (2017) 164–172
165
highly exposed to sociocultural and media pressure, specically related to muscularity ideals, and research with adolescents has not
found gender dierences in issues related to body objectication, media models, and perceived pressure about the adolescents' bodies
(Knauss, Paxton, & Alsaker, 2008). Individuals with high levels of body objectication show more body dissatisfaction (Knauss et al.,
2008) and address their body concerns with negative coping strategies, such as avoidance or continued eorts to change one's
appearance; on the contrary, positive coping strategies, such as self-care or rational acceptance, are negatively related to body
objectication (Choma, Shove, Busseri, Sadava, & Hosker, 2009). The objectied-body consciousness can lead to negative outcomes
for well-beingsuch as higher negative aection (Miner-Rubino, Twenge, & Fredrickson, 2002), sexual impairment (Wiederman,
2000), rumination, and depression (Grabe et al., 2007).
Body self-esteem has been conceived in the literature (Mendelson, Mendelson, & White, 2001) as a multidimensional construct.
One of its dimensions refers to other people's evaluations of one's appearance, and it was named the body-esteem attribution, a
concept similar to the objectied-body consciousness; both of them refer to a facet of self-esteem dependent on an external point of
view and imply the sociocultural model's inuence. Moreover, mass-media models aect adolescents' perceptions about their ideal
body image, helping them to face developmental tasks related to body image and identity construction (Ata, Ludden, & Lally, 2007).
This process seems to take place actively because adolescents seek information and models in television and media, but it also seems
to take place by mere exposure to media contents (Harrison & Hefner, 2006). Thus, during adolescence, issues related to body
changes, sexuality exploration, and identity construction seem to be associated with several individual, social, and media inuences.
1.2. Individual dierences in sexting motivations
Therefore, in line with the SCT (Bandura, 2001), we aimed to investigate how body-esteem attribution, body objectication, and
the internalization of media models are related to dierent sexting motivations, controlling for sociodemographic variablesgender,
age, and sexual orientation. Gender dierences in sexting behaviors and motivations have been broadly described in the literature:
Boys were found to be more likely than girls to engage in online sexual behaviors and risky sexual behaviors (Bongers, Koot, Van der
Ende, & Verhulst, 2003; Jonsson, Priebe, Bladh, & Svedin, 2014) and to report more instrumental/aggravated motivations (Bianchi
et al., 2016, 2017). Conversely, girls (vs. boys) are more likely to sext under pressure from partners and friends (Drouin & Tobin,
2014; Henderson & Morgan, 2011; Lippman & Campbell, 2014) or to sext to gain the attention of a potential partner and increase
their popularity among their peers (Bianchi et al., 2017; Lippman & Campbell, 2014).
Regarding age dierences, sexting behaviors increase with age (Dake, Price, Maziarz, & Ward, 2012; Rice et al., 2012; Strassberg,
McKinnon, Sustaita, & Rullo, 2013), and young adults report more sexual motivations for sexting (Bianchi et al., 2017; National
Campaign & CosmoGirl, 2008).
Finally, research has also shown sexual orientation dierences, with sexual minority people, mostly gay men, reporting more
sexting behaviors than their heterosexual counterparts do (Gámez Guadix, Almendros, Borrajo, & Calvete, 2015; Morelli et al., 2016a;
Rice et al., 2012). Some studies (Bauermeister, Yeagley, Meanley, & Pingel, 2014; Chong, Zhang, Mak, & Pang, 2015; Rice et al.,
2012) suggest that sexual minorities engage in a greater use of online environments for exploring their sexuality and meeting partners
and that same-sex couples found sexting more acceptable than heterosexual ones (Chong et al., 2015; Hertlein, Shadid, & Steelman,
2015). As theorized by the minority stress model (Meyer, 2003), new technologies appeared to facilitate relationships and com-
munication among sexual minoritiesworking as protective factors against the social stigma, prejudice, and discrimination that
aect the psychological and relational well-being of sexual minorities.
2. Aims and hypotheses
Considering the abovementioned literature we aimed to examine the contributions of body esteem, objectied-body conscious-
ness, and the internalization of media models to sexting motivations among adolescents, beyond the documented eects of gender,
age, and sexual orientation. Because of the sexual double standard (Ringrose, Harvey, Gill, & Livingstone, 2013), we expected an
eect of gender on sexting motivations related to instrumental/aggravated reasons, which appear more frequently with boys (vs.
girls).
Due to the role of sexting as a precursor to sexual activity during development (Temple & Choi, 2014), we also expected that
sexual motivations related to sexual aims could be reported more often by young adults (vs. adolescents). Finally, in line with the
minority stress model (Meyer, 2003), we expected an eect of sexual orientation on sexual purposes; we specically hypothesized
that sexual minorities would show more sexual purposes than the heterosexual participants would.
However, beyond the eect of these variables that we controlled for as covariates, we hypothesized that sexting for sexual
purposes is predicted by body-esteem attribution and body objectication, in line with the previous literature (Schick et al., 2010;
Woertman & van den Brink, 2012). Moreover, we hypothesized that sexting for body-image reinforcement (i.e., achieving peers'
conrmation about body adequacy) is predicted by the internalization of cultural and media models of idealized bodies. The com-
parison with idealized models provided by the media could make facing the developmental tasks related to the redenition and
acceptance of one's body image harder, increasing concerns of body adequacy among teenagers. Thus, sexting could become a new
vehicle for facing concerns about body image because the positive feedback from peers and potential partners works as a con-
rmation of body adequacy, as suggested in previous studies (Chalfen, 2009; Siibak, 2009). Conversely, regarding sexting for in-
strumental/aggravated reasons (i.e., secondary aims and harmful intentions), we did not expect any relationship with body-esteem
attribution, body objectication, or the internalization of media models.
D. Bianchi et al. Journal of Adolescence 61 (2017) 164–172
166
3. Methods
3.1. Participants
The original sample included 257 participants aged from 13 to 20 (M
age
= 17.6; SD
age
= 1.9; 46.3% females). Only participants
who sent sexts at least once during the last year were selected to take part to the study (N= 190). Thus, the participants included in
the present study were 190 Italian adolescents aged from 13 to 20 (M
age
= 17.4; SD
age
= 1.8; 44.7% females) and were recruited in
secondary schools in urban and suburban areas of Rome. Regarding their sexual orientation, the majority of participants were
exclusively heterosexual (80.5%; n= 153). We conducted the data collection via an online survey because of research suggesting that
sensitive information is more candidly reported if the assessment is conducted via computer or online rather than via paper-and-
pencil questionnaires (Clark Newman et al., 2002). For underage participants, informed-consent forms were obtained from parents
and school authorities. All participants gave their informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics
Committee of the Department of Social and Developmental Psychology of Sapienza University of Rome approved this study.
3.2. Measures
3.2.1. Sociodemographic data
We asked the participants about some demographic data such as age, gender, and sexual orientation. We assessed sexual or-
ientation through the Kinsey Scale (Kinsey, Pomeroy, & Martin, 1948) on a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (exclusively heterosexual) to 5
(exclusively homosexual). We then categorized the participants into two groups according to their answers: a group of exclusively
heterosexual adolescents who answered 1 and a group of not exclusively heterosexual adolescents who answered from 2 to 5.
3.2.2. Motivations for sexting
The Sexting Motivation Questionnaire (Bianchi et al., 2016) assessed motivations for sending sexts. Sexting was dened as the
exchange of sexually suggestive or provocative text messages, photos, or videos by smartphone, the Internet, or social network
websites (Chalfen, 2009). The instrument, composed of 13 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (Never) to 4 (Always), assessed
three motivations for sending sexts: a) sexual purposes, which refers to the sending of sexts for sexual aims (ve items; e.g.,
Sometimes I sext for irting or hooking up); b) body-image reinforcement, which refers to the use of sexting in order to get social
reinforcement about the adequacy of one's body (three items; e.g., Sometimes I sext to test if I am pretty enough); or c) instru-
mental/aggravated reasons, which refer to the use of sexting for secondary aims not related to sexuality (ve items; e.g., Sometimes I
sext in exchange for money or gifts). The three dimensions showed good reliabilitywith a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 for sexual
purposes, 0.89 for body-image reinforcement, and 0.86 for instrumental/aggravated reasons.
3.2.3. Body-esteem attribution
The Attribution subscale from the Body Esteem Scale (BES, Confalonieri, Gatti, Ionio, & Tracante, 2008; Mendelson et al., 2001)
was used to assess a specic dimension of body esteem that is related to evaluations attributed to other people about one's body. This
dimension included four items rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); a sample item is My looks help me get
dates.In the present study, the Attribution subscale showed a moderate reliability (α= 0.64).
3.2.4. Objectied body consciousness
The 14-item version of the Objectied-Body Consciousness Scale for Youth (Lindberg, Hyde, & McKinley, 2006) evaluated the
objectied-body consciousness (McKinley & Hyde, 1996). The scale evaluated body surveillance, body shame, and appearance-
control beliefs. A sample item was I often compare how I look with how other people look.Participants rated each item on a 7-point
Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). In this study, the scale showed a good reliability (α= 0.74).
3.2.5. Internalization of sociocultural and media models
In order to assess the inuence of sociocultural and mass media ideals on body evaluation, we selected four items from the
Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire (Stefanile, Matera, Nerini, & Pisani, 2011; Thompson, van den Berg,
Roehrig, Guarda, & Heinberg, 2004) in order to investigate the internalization of beauty ideals and athletic body ideals provided by
the mass media (e.g., I compare my appearance to the appearance of TV and movie stars). The participants rated their answers on a
5-point Likert scale from 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely agree), and we computed a total score. The scale reached a
Cronbach's alpha of 0.78.
3.3. Data analysis
First, we computed correlations among all of variables included in the study. For descriptive purposes, we ran two independent
sample t-tests only for the categorical variables in order to verify gender and sexual orientation dierences in sexting motivations, and
we computed the Cohen's das eect sizes. Then, we ran three hierarchical-regression analyses in order to investigate whether body-
esteem attribution, objectied-body consciousness, and the internalization of sociocultural and media models could dierently
predict the motivations for sending sexts (i.e., sexual purposes, body-image reinforcement, and instrumental/aggravated reason-
s)controlling for age, gender, and sexual orientation. In the rst step of each regression, we included gender, age, and sexual
D. Bianchi et al. Journal of Adolescence 61 (2017) 164–172
167
orientation as covariates. In the second step, we regressed the criterion on body-esteem attribution, objectied-body consciousness,
and the internalization of sociocultural and media models.
4. Results
4.1. Correlations among variables
Gender appeared related only to instrumental/aggravated reasons, which were reported more by males (vs. females), whereas age
appeared positively related only to sexual purposes, which were reported more by older adolescents (vs. younger). Sexual orientation,
too, was moderately related only to sexual purposes, which were more reported by not exclusively heterosexual participants (vs.
heterosexuals). Body-esteem attribution and objectied-body consciousness appeared modestly and positively related to both sexual
purposes and body-image reinforcement. Finally, the internalization of sociocultural and media models appeared to be positively and
modestly related to body-image reinforcement. The correlations and descriptive statistics are reported in Table 1.
Regarding the categorical variables, we found signicant gender dierences only for instrumental/aggravated reasonst
(188) = 2.84, p< 0.01, Cohen's d= 0.29. Males reported more instrumental/aggravated reasons than females did, conrming the
correlations. We found signicant sexual orientation dierences only for sexual purposest(188) = 3.37, p< 0.01, Cohen's
d= 0.62. Participants who were not exclusively heterosexual reported more sexual purposes than their exclusively heterosexual
counterparts did, conrming correlations.
4.2. Hierarchical-regression analyses
We conducted three hierarchical-regression analyses by following the previously described procedure to determine whether body-
esteem attribution, objectied-body consciousness, and the internalization of sociocultural and media models predict sexual pur-
poses, body-image reinforcement, and instrumental/aggravated reasons, respectively, as motivations for sending sextscontrolling
Table 1
Correlations among variables.
1 23456789MSD
1.Gender 1 ––
2.Age 0.147* 1 17.04 1.76
3.Sexual Orientation 0.253** 0.132 1 ––
4.BES 0.180* 0.046 0.032 1 12.01 3.05
5.OBC 0.363** 0.098 0.113 0.070 1 61.97 13.24
6.ISMM 0.124 0.081 0.067 0.165* 0.529** 1 11.37 4.21
7.Sexual purposes 0.121 0.224** 0.239** 0.237** 0.224** 0.124 1 2.32 1.07
8.Body image reinforcement 0.026 0.051 0.098 0.146* 0.188** 0.285** 0.580** 1 1.80 0.93
9.Instrumental/aggravated reasons 0.203** 0.059 0.020 0.065 0.099 0.063 0.151* 0.037 1 1.13 0.44
Note 1: **p< 0.01; *p< 0.05; Gender was coded as 0 = Males and 1 = Females. Sexual orientation was coded as 0 = exclusively heterosexuals and 1 = not
exclusively heterosexuals; BES = Body Esteem Scale Attribution; OBC = Objectied Body Consciousness; ISMM = Internalization of socio cultural and media models.
Table 2
Hierarchical-regression analyses (N= 190).
Predictor Sexting motivations
Sexual purposes Body image reinforcement Instrumental/aggravated reasons
ΔR
2
BSE βΔR
2
BSE βΔR
2
BSE β
Step 1 0.10*** 0.01 0.05*
Gender 0.45 0.78 0.04 0.02 0.43 0.003 0.95* 0.33 0.22**
Age 0.58** 0.21 0.19** 0.06 0.12 0.04 0.05 0.09 0.04
Sexual Orientation 2.74** 0.98 0.20** 0.66 0.53 0.09 0.44 0.41 0.08
Step 2 0.09*** 0.09** 0.003
Gender 0.32 0.81 0.03 0.17 0.45 0.03 0.20* 2.46 0.20*
Age 0.58** 0.21 0.19** 0.04 0.11 0.02 0.03 0.46 0.03
Sexual Orientation 2.7** 0.93 0.20** 0.59 0.51 0.08 0.08 1.08 0.08
BES 0.44** 0.12 0.25*** 0.09 0.07 0.10 0.04 0.49 0.04
OBC 0.07* 0.03 0.18* 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.15 0.01
ISMM 0.06 0.10 0.04 0.16** 0.06 0.23** 0.04 0.46 0.04
Total R
2
0.19*** 0.10** 0.05
Note. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001. Gender was coded as 0 = Males and 1 = Females. Sexual orientation was coded as 0 = exclusively heterosexuals and
1 = not exclusively heterosexuals; BES = Body Esteem Scale Attribution; OBC = Objectied Body Consciousness; ISMM = Internalization of socio cultural and media
models. Interaction eects between each predictor (BES, OBC and ISMM) and gender were also tested, but no signicant interaction eects were found.
D. Bianchi et al. Journal of Adolescence 61 (2017) 164–172
168
for gender, age, and sexual orientation. Regarding the rst hierarchical regression analysis in which we predicted sexual purposes,
the predictorsgender, age, and sexual orientationentered in the rst step as covariates and accounted for 9.6% of the variance
(Table 2).
Both age and sexual orientation emerged as signicant predictors, with older adolescents (vs. younger) and people who were not
exclusively heterosexual (vs. exclusively heterosexual) reporting more sexual purposes. In the second stepin which we added body-
esteem attribution, objectied-body consciousness, and the internalization of sociocultural and media models to the equa-
tion18.7% of the variance was accounted for, with a signicant increment of 9.1% in the explained variance [ΔF[3, 183] = 6.84;
p= 0.000]. Age and sexual orientation were still signicant predictors but, controlling for these variables, body-esteem attribution,
and objectied body consciousness turned out to be signicant predictors of sexual purposes.
Regarding the second hierarchical-regression analysis, body-image reinforcement was regressed on the predictors gender, age,
and sexual orientation entered in the rst step. These predictors were revealed to not be signicant covariates, accounting for only
1.1% of the variance. In the second step, body-esteem attribution, objectied-body consciousness, and the internalization of socio-
cultural and media models were added to the equation, and 10.1% of the variance was accounted for, with a signicant increment of
9% in the explained variance [ΔF(3, 183) = 6.07; p= 0.001]. Only the internalization of sociocultural and media models turned out
to be a signicant predictor of body-image reinforcement.
Finally, regarding the third hierarchical-regression analysis, instrumental/aggravated reasons were regressed on the predictors
gender, age and sexual orientation, entered in the rst step as covariates. They accounted for 4.8% of the variance. Only gender
emerged as a signicant predictor, with boys (vs. girls) reporting more instrumental/aggravated reasons. In the second stepin
which body-esteem attribution, objectied-body consciousness, and the internalization of sociocultural and media models were
added to the equationonly the 5.1% of the variance was accounted for, and this increment of 0.3% in the explained variance was
not signicant [ΔF(3, 183) = 0.18, p=ns]. Thus, body-esteem attribution, objectied-body consciousness, and the internalization of
sociocultural and media models did not emerge as signicant predictors of instrumental/aggravated reasons.
5. Discussion
In this study, we investigated sexting motivations during adolescencedistinguishing between developmental issues, such as
sexual aims and body-image reinforcement, and more deviant or harmful motivations, such as instrumental/aggravated reasons.
Specically, we aimed to verify the relevance of body esteem, the objectied-body consciousness, and the internalization of socio-
cultural and media models in predicting dierent sexting motivations. We also controlled for gender, age, and sexual orientation.
In line with our hypotheses, results on demographic variables showed that older adolescents and not exclusively heterosexual
participants were more likely to report sexual purposes as motivations for sending sexts. In recent literature (National
Campaign & CosmoGirl, 2008), sexting for sexual purposes increased with age, becoming the most reported sexting motivation among
young adults (Bianchi et al., 2016; 2017). A longitudinal study (Temple & Choi, 2014) showed that engaging in sexting leads to earlier
sexual activity, working as a precursor of sexual initiation. Thus, we pose that older adolescents have learned during their previous
experiences that sexting facilitates sexual intercourse and that they can purposely use it for sexual aims. Moreover, adolescents who
were not exclusively heterosexual reported more sexual purposes for engaging in sexting, conrming previous literature about the
higher acceptance of sexting among same-sex couples (Chong et al., 2015; Hertlein et al., 2015) and the greater use of online and
mobile communication for meeting partners among sexual minorities (Bauermeister et al., 2014; Chong et al., 2015; Rice et al.,
2012). This result can be explained by the facilitating role of new media communication in friendship and dating relationships among
sexual minorities; online environments allow them to meet friends and potential partners and to express and explore their sexualities
and identitiesproviding the perception of safeness from social stigma and discrimination and working as a protective factor for
relational and psychological well-being among sexual minorities (Meyer, 2003).
Beyond the eects of age and sexual orientation, body-esteem attribution and objectied-body consciousness predicted sexting for
sexual purposes. Thus, regarding body-esteem attribution, our results showed that adolescents who sext for sexual purposes had a
body self-esteem that was strongly dependent on others' supposed evaluations of their bodies. It is conceivable that this use of sexting
during adolescence implies the belief that, in order to engage in sexual intercourse, it is important to be well evaluated by a potential
partner, on whom the adolescent's self-esteem is dependent. Sexting for sexual purposes appeared to also imply body objectica-
tionwhich was composed of shame, concerns, and unrealistic beliefs of control about body appearance. Body objectication re-
ferred to belief of the body as an object that is evaluated according to cultural and sexualized standards and is perceived to belong less
to the self and more to others (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997). Sexual objectication of the body in the literature has been related to a
general impairment of sexual functioning and sexual satisfactionleading to more social and sexual avoidance, higher sexual
anxiety, less sexual assertiveness, and lower sexual self-esteem (Calogero & Thompson, 2009; Sanchez & Kiefer, 2007;
Steer & Tiggemann, 2008; Wiederman, 2000; Yamamiya, Cash, & Thompson, 2006). Thus, adolescents with high body objectication
are also more concerned about sexuality and sexual intercourse, experiencing them with more anxiety and less assertiveness. Con-
sequently, it is understandable how sexting could be a good vehicle for experiencing sexuality because it ensures control of body
image, provides more emotional disengagement, and helps the sender to be more assertive, in spite of the anxiety related to body and
sexual adequacy (Weisskirch & Delevi, 2011). A previous study on online behaviors (Suler, 2004) suggested that the characteristics of
the online dimension allow more emotional and moral disengagement.
Thus, when these body-image concerns are high, our results suggested that sexting could be a rst expression of sexuality during
adolescence, simultaneously guaranteeing control over body disclosure and testing the partner's response. These ndings seem to
explain how sexting becomes a way of addressing developmental goals related to sexuality initiation and exploration, mostly for
D. Bianchi et al. Journal of Adolescence 61 (2017) 164–172
169
teenagers more concerned about body and sexual adequacy. These results are also consistent with the stimulation hypothesis
(Valkenburg & Peter, 2007; Valkenburg, Peter, & Schouten, 2006), which shows how media-based communication could improve self-
esteem and well-being due to positive feedback from peers.
In line with the SCT (Bandura, 2001), our results also indicated that sexting for body-image reinforcement appears to be predicted
by the internalization of mass-media models, after we controlled for demographic variables. These ndings suggest that, when young
people are used to compare their bodies with idealized and unrealistic media models, they are also more likely to engage in sexting to
receive conrmation about the adequacy of their bodies, probably thinking their bodies should be in line with media standards of
beauty and sexuality. These results are not aected by gender, age, and sexual orientationshowing how the eect of the inter-
nalization of media models on this sexting motivation is similar for males and females from early to late adolescence regardless to
sexual orientation. Sexting in this case may become an expression of a teen's developmental task, as suggested in our previous work
(Bianchi et al., 2017). It could also be an expression of a cultural issue related to comparisons with media modelsgenerally aecting
teens with higher appearance investment (Hargreaves & Tiggemann, 2004).
Finally, regarding instrumental/aggravated reasons for sexting, our results showed that they were more frequently reported by
males, which is consistent with previous literature (Morelli, Bianchi, Baiocco, Pezzuti, & Chirumbolo, 2016c; Romer & Hennessy,
2007) that found risky sexual behaviors more frequently among boys (vs. girls). After we controlled for demographic variables, none
of the body-image variables that we investigated were predictive of instrumental/aggravated motivations. Actually, our previous
work (Bianchi et al., 2016) showed that instrumental/aggravated sexting motivations were related to aggravated sexting behaviors,
such as not allowed sharing of sexts, suggesting the presence of other underlying variables, such as antisocial personality traits, that
future research should investigate.
This study has signicant research implications, as it conrms the importance of taking into account the roles of cultural context
and developmental stages as antecedents of sexting for sexual aims and body-image conrmation. Some of the relevant research
implications are also related to instrumental and aggravated sexting motivations, the antecedents of which should be deeply in-
vestigated. In other work (Bianchi et al., 2016, 2017) we documented the low prevalence of this sexting motivation but pointed out
its high-risk consequences, which are related to cyber aggression and the exploitation of sexual contents. Because of the low pre-
valence of this motivation, it is conceivable that this dimension could characterize specic high-risk samples regardless of socio-
cultural issues, which deserves further studies. For example, Romer, Reyna, and Satterthwaite (2017) found that maladaptive ten-
dencies toward sensation seeking and impulsive action are typical of young people with weak control over limbic motivation.
Moreover, further studies are needed to explore whether instrumental/aggravated sexting motivations are more strongly related to
the tendency to aggress toward peers and partners than sexual and body image motivations are. It is also conceivable that sexual and
body-image motivations for sexting could expose young people to suer cyber-victimization and other forms of violence, but it is
possible that only instrumental/aggravated motivations could be indicators of the tendencies to perpetrate aggression and cyber-
aggression. Thus, research should investigate the inuence of dierent individual and contextual variables in this process.
Our ndings also have clinical and educational implications. In consideration of the harmful and risky consequences of an unwise
use of sexting, prevention programs should be directed toward adolescents and preadolescents, as they are specic at-risk groups for
sociocultural pressure and concerns about body image. These educational programs should focus on improving knowledge of sexual
development and pubertal changes and deconstructing the idealized body image presented in the mediapaying particular attention
to the needs of specic vulnerable groups such sexual minorities, as suggested by our ndings and previous literature. Specic
education programs aimed at deconstructing gender stereotypes and media ideals could be useful in the prevention of sexting for
sexual purposes and body-image reinforcement. Conversely, increasing awareness about specic features of online contexts, such as
the false sense of privacy and easiness of disinhibition and aggressions, could be used to prevent sexting for instrumental and
aggravated reasons. Adolescents could also benet from interventions based on considerations of future consequences, with an
emphasis on problem solving and improving interpersonal sensitivity and empathy. Educational and prevention programs for specic
at-risk groups should be implemented with consideration for the higher prevalence of instrumental/aggravated motivations among
boys. These programs should focus on improving impulse control and awareness of risky behaviors, as suggested by recent neu-
roscience studies on risk-taking during adolescence (Romer et al., 2017; Shulman, Harden, Chein, & Steinberg, 2015). Regarding
clinical implications, brief screenings on adolescents could consider body-image concerns as a possible index of a normative use of
sexting, with requests for clinical attention only in the presence of a severe impairment of body image. Thus, our ndings sustain the
interpretation of sexting as a common, normative behavior during adolescence that could support developmental goals and that
would deserve further attention only in the presence of specic high-risk motivations.
Nevertheless, the limitations of this study are related to the use of self-report instruments, which are usually aected by social
desirability when sensitive information is investigated. Specically, the null ndings related to instrumental/aggravated reasons
could be due to both the low frequency of this specic motivation and the tendency to underreport these answers for social desir-
ability. Moreover, our results could be aected by the cultural context. As suggested by a recent cross-cultural study on sexting
behaviors (Baumgartner, Sumter, Peter, Valkenburg, & Livingstone, 2014), attitudes and behaviors are shaped by cultural values and
spread by relevant social institutionssuch as families, schools, and the media. Thus, future cross-cultural studies about sexting
motivations should be conducted in order to conrm these results, taking into account the roles of traditionalism (Baumgartner et al.,
2014) and post-feminist media culture (Ringrose et al., 2013). Specically, it is conceivable that gendered values in traditionalist
cultures could explain gender dierences in sexting behaviors and motivations.
Finally, the study was cross sectional. Thus, we cannot infer causal but rather correlational relationships. Future longitudinal
studies should explore the causal relationships between body-image variables and sexting motivations during adolescence.
D. Bianchi et al. Journal of Adolescence 61 (2017) 164–172
170
Funding
This research did not receive any specic grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-prot sectors.
References
AP-MTV (2009). A thin line: 2009 APMTV digital abuse study. Retrieved from http://www.athinline.org/MTV-AP_Digital_Abuse_Study_Full.pdf.
Ata, R. N., Ludden, A. B., & Lally, M. M. (2007). The eects of gender and family, friend, and media inuences on eating behaviors and body image during adolescence.
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(8), 10241037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9159-x.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03.
Bauermeister, J. A., Yeagley, E., Meanley, S., & Pingel, E. S. (2014). Sexting among young men who have sex with men: Results from a national survey. Journal of
Adolescent Health, 54, 606611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.10.013.
Baumgartner, S. E., Sumter, S. R., Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M., & Livingstone, S. (2014). Does country context matter? Investigating the predictors of teen sexting across
Europe. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 157164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.041.
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., & Chirumbolo, A. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Sexting Motivations Questionnaire for adolescents and young adults.
Rassegna di Psicologia, 33(3), 518. http://dx.doi.org/10.4558/8067-01.
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., & Chirumbolo, A. (2017). The paths of Sexting: Individual dierences in sexting motivations. (Manuscript submitted for publication).
Blos, P. (1979). The adolescent passage: Developmental issues. New York: International Universities Press.
Bongers, I. L., Koot, H. M., Van der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2003). The normative development of child and adolescent problem behavior. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology, 112(2), 179192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.2.179.
Calogero, R. M., & Thompson, J. K. (2009). Potential implications of the objectication of women's bodies for women's sexual satisfaction. Body Image, 6(2), 145148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.01.001.
Chalfen, R. (2009). It's only a picture: Sexting, smuttysnapshots and felony charges. Visual Studies, 24(3), 258268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/
14725860903309203.
Choma, B. L., Shove, C., Busseri, M. A., Sadava, S. W., & Hosker, A. (2009). Assessing the role of body image coping strategies as mediators or moderators of the links
between self objectication, body shame, and well-being. Sex Roles, 61(910), 699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9666-9.
Chong, E. S., Zhang, Y., Mak, W. W., & Pang, I. H. (2015). Social media as social capital of LGB individuals in Hong Kong: Its relations with group membership, stigma,
and mental wellbeing. American Journal of Community Psychology, 55(12), 228238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10464014-9699-2.
Clark Newman, J., Des Jarlais, D. C., Turner, C. F., Gribble, J., Cooley, P., & Paone, D. (2002). The dierential eects of face-to-face and computer interview modes.
American Journal of Public Health, 92, 294297.
Confalonieri, E., Gatti, E., Ionio, C., & Tracante, D. (2008). Body esteem scale: A validation on Italian adolescents. TPMtesting, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied
Psychology, 15(3), 153165.
Cook, K. S., Cheshire, C., Rice, E. R., & Nakagawa, S. (2013). Social exchange theory. Handbook of social Psychology (pp. 6188). Springer Netherlands.
Dake, J. A., Price, D. H., Maziarz, L., & Ward, B. (2012). Prevalence and correlates of sexting behaviour in adolescents. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7,115.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2012.650959.
Daniel, S., & Bridges, S. K. (2010). The drive for muscularity in men: Media inuences and objectication theory. Body Image, 7(1), 3238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.bodyim.2009.08.003.
Dir, A. L., Coskunpinar, A., Steiner, J. L., & Cyders, M. A. (2013). Understanding dierences in sexting behaviors across gender, relationship status, and sexual identity,
and the role of expectancies in sexting. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(8), 568574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0545.
Drouin, M., Ross, J., & Tobin, E. (2015). Sexting: A new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression? Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 197204. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.001.
Drouin, M., & Tobin, E. (2014). Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: Relations with attachment and sexual motivations. Computers in Human
Behavior, 31(2014), 412418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.001.
Emmers-Sommer, T. M., Farrell, J., Gentry, A., Stevens, S., Eckstein, J., Battocletti, J., et al. (2010). First date sexual expectations: The eects of who asked, who paid,
date location, and gender. Communication Studies, 61, 339355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510971003752676.
Erikson, E. H. (1970). Autobiographic notes on the identity crisis. Daedalus, 99(4), 730759.
Eurispes, & Telefono Azzurro (2012). Explorative investigation about Italian condition of infancy and adolescence [Indagine conoscitiva sulla condizione dellinfanzia
edelladolescenza in Italia]. Retrieved from http://www.azzurro.it/sites/default/les/Sintesi Indagine conoscitiva Infanzia Adolescenza 2012_1.pdf.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117140.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectication theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.
tb00108.x.
Gámez-Guadix, M., Almendros, C., Borrajo, E., & Calvete, E. (2015). Prevalence and association of sexting and online sexual victimization among Spanish adults.
Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12(2), 145154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0186-9.
Gibson, K. (2016). Sexting and the application of the social exchange theoryMasters thesis . Retrived from https://ecommons.usask.ca/bitstream/handle/10388/7414/
GIBSON-THESIS-2016.pdf?sequence=1.
Grabe, S., Hyde, J. S., & Lindberg, S. M. (2007). Body objectication and depression in adolescents: The role of gender, shame, and rumination. Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 31(2), 164175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00350.x.
Hargreaves, D. A., & Tiggemann, M. (2004). Idealized media images and adolescent body image:Comparingboys and girls. Body Image, 1(4), 351361. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.10.002.
Harrison, K., & Hefner, V. (2006). Media exposure, current and future body ideals, and disordered eating among preadolescent girls: A longitudinal panel study.
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(2), 146156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-9008-3.
Henderson, L., & Morgan, E. (2011). Sexting and sexual relationships among teens and young adults. McNair Scholars Research Journal, 7(1), 3139. Retrieved from
http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1091&context=mcnair_journal.
Hertlein, K. M., Shadid, C., & Steelman, S. M. (2015). Exploring perceptions of acceptability of sexting in same-sex, bisexual, heterosexual relationships and com-
munities. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 14, 342357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2014.960547.
Jonsson, L. S., Priebe, G., Bladh, M., & Svedin, C. G. (2014). Voluntary sexual exposure online among Swedish youth social background, internet behaviour and
psychosocial health. Computers in Human Behaviour, 30, 181190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.005.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
Knauss, C., Paxton, S. J., & Alsaker, F. D. (2008). Body dissatisfaction in adolescent boys and girls: Objectied body consciousness, internalization of the media body
ideal and perceived pressure from media. Sex Roles, 59(910), 633643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9474-7.
Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and sexting, how and why minor teens are sending sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude images via text messaging. Pew Internet and
american life project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Teens-and-Sexting.aspx.
Lerum, K., & Dworkin, S. L. (2009). Bad girls rule: An interdisciplinary feminist commentary on the report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Journal
of Sex Research, 46(4), 250263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224490903079542.
Levine, D. (2013). Sexting: A terrifying health riskor the new normal for young adults? Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(3), 257258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
jadohealth.2013.01.003.
Lichtenberg, J. D. (2013). Psychoanalysis and motivation,Vol. 10. London: Routledge.
Lindberg, S. M., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). Gender, pubertal development, and peer sexual harassment predict objectied body consciousness in early adoles-
cence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(4), 723742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00544.x.
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., & McKinley, N. M. (2006). A measure of objectied body consciousness for preadolescent and adolescent youth. Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 30(1), 6576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00263.x.
D. Bianchi et al. Journal of Adolescence 61 (2017) 164–172
171
Lippman, J. R., & Campbell, S. W. (2014). Damned if you do, damned if you don'tif you're a girl: Relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the
United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 371386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.923009.
McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectied body consciousness scale Development and Validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(2), 181215. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.
Mendelson, B. K., Mendelson, M. J., & White, D. R. (2001). Body-esteem scale for adolescents and adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76(1), 90106. http://dx.
doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7601_6.
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological
Bulletin, 129(5), 674697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.
Miner-Rubino, K., Twenge, J. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2002). Trait self-objectication in women: Aective and personality correlates. Journal of Research in Personality,
36(2), 147172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2001.2343.
Morelli, M., Bianchi, D., Baiocco, R., Pezzuti, L., & Chirumbolo, A. (2016a). Sexting, psychological distress and dating violence among adolescents and young adults.
Psicothema, 28(2), 137142. http://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2015.193.
Morelli, M., Bianchi, D., Baiocco, R., Pezzuti, L., & Chirumbolo, A. (2016b). Not-allowed sharing of sexts and dating violence from the perpetrator's perspective: The
moderation role of sexism. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 163169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.047.
Morelli, M., Bianchi, D., Baiocco, R., Pezzuti, L., & Chirumbolo, A. (2016c). Sexting behaviors and cyber pornography addiction among adolescents: The moderating
role of alcohol consumption. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0234-0.
National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy &CosmoGirlcom (2008). Sex and tech. Retrieved from http://thenationalcampaign.org/sites/default/
les/resourceprimarydownload/sex_and_tech_summary.pdf.
van Oosten, J. M., & Vandenbosch, L. (2017). Sexy online self-presentation on social network sites and the willingness to engage in sexting: A comparison of gender
and age. Journal of Adolescence, 54,4250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.11.006.
Pearson, M. R., Kholodkov, T., Henson, J. M., & Impett, E. A. (2012). Pathways to early coital debut for adolescent girls: A recursive partitioning analysis. Journal of Sex
Research, 49(1), 1326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.565428.
Rice, E., Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., Sanchez, M., Montoya, J., Plant, A., et al. (2012). Sexually explicit cell phone messaging associated with sexual risk among
adolescents. Pediatrics, 130(4), 667673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-0021.
Ringrose, J., Gill, R., Livingstone, S., & Harvey, L. (2012). A qualitative study of children, young people and'sexting': A report prepared for the NSPCC. Retrieved from
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/44216/1/__Lible_repository_Content_Livingstone%2C%20S_A%20qualitative%20study%20of%20children%2C%20young%20people
%20and%20%27sexting%27%20%28LSE%20RO%29.pdf.
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and sexting: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory,
14(3), 305323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853.
Romer, D., & Hennessy, M. (2007). A biosocial-aect model of adolescent sensation seeking: The role of aect evaluation and peer-group inuence in adolescent drug
use. Prevention Science, 8(2), 89102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0064-7.
Romer, D., Reyna, V. F., & Satterthwaite, T. D. (2017). Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk Taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context.
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 27,1934. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.007.
Sanchez, D. T., & Kiefer, A. K. (2007). Body concerns in and out of the bedroom: Implications for sexual pleasure and problems. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(6),
808820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9205-0.
Schick, V., Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., Middlestadt, S. E., et al. (2010). Sexual behaviors, condom use, and sexual health of americans over 50:
Implications for sexual health promotion for older adults. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 315329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02013.x .
Schmitt, K. L., Dayanim, S., & Matthias, S. (2008). Personal homepage construction as an expression of social development. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 496506.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.496.
Shulman, E. P., Harden, K. P., Chein, J. M., & Steinberg, L. (2015). Sex dierences in the developmental trajectories of impulse control and sensation-seeking from
early adolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(1), 117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0116-9.
Siibak, A. (2009). Constructing the self through the photo selection-visual impression management on social networking websites. Cyberpsychology: Journal of
Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(1), 1. http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2009061501&article=1.
Šmahel, & Subrahmanyam, K. (2014). Adolescent sexuality on the internet: A developmental perspective. In F. M. Saleh, A. GrudinskasJr., & A. Judge (Eds.). Adolescent
sexual behavior in the digital age: Considerations for clinicians, legal professionals, and educators (pp. 6988). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Steer, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). The role of self-objectication in women's sexual functioning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(3), 205225. http://
search.proquest.com/docview/224863961?accountid=13698.
Stefanile, C., Matera, C., Nerini, A., & Pisani, E. (2011). Validation of an Italian version of the sociocultural attitudes towards appearance Questionnaire-3 (SATAQ-3)
on adolescent girls. Body Image, 8(4), 432436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.06.001.
Strassberg, D. S., McKinnon, R. K., Sustaita, M. A., & Rullo, J. (2013). Sexting by high school students: An exploratory and descriptive study. Archives of Sexual
Behaviour, 42(1), 1521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9969-8.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition eect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295.
Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what eect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159163. http://
www.jstor.org/stable/20182799.
Temple, J. R., & Choi, H. (2014). Longitudinal association between teen sexting and sexual behavior. Pediatrics, 134(5), e1287e1292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/
peds.2014-1974.
Thompson, J. K., van den Berg, P., Roehrig, M., Guarda, A. S., & Heinberg, L. J. (2004). The sociocultural attitudes towards appearance scale- 3 (SATAQ 3):
Development and validation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35(3), 293304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.10257.
Tiggemann, M., & Kuring, J. K. (2004). The role of body objectication in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(3), 299311.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/0144665031752925.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267277.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267.
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem.
CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(5), 584590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584.
Vanden Abeele, M., Campbell, S. W., Eggermont, S., & Roe, K. (2014). Sexting, mobile porn use, and peer group dynamics: Boys' and girls' self-perceived popularity,
need for popularity, and perceived peer pressure. Media Psychology, 17(1), 633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.801725.
Walker, S., Sanci, L., & Temple-Smith, M. (2013). Sexting: Young women's and men's views on its nature and origins. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(6), 697701.
Walrave, M., Heirman, W., & Hallam, L. (2014). Under pressure to sext? Applying the theory of planned behaviour to adolescent sexting. Behaviour & Information
Technology, 33(1), 8698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.837099.
Weisskirch, R. S., & Delevi, R. (2011). Sextingand adult romantic attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 16971701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.
2011.02.008.
Wiederman, M. W. (2000). Women's body image self- consciousness during physical intimacy with a partner. Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 6068. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1080/00224490009552021.
Woertman, L., & van den Brink, F. (2012). Body image and female sexual functioning and behavior: A review. Journal of Sex Research, 49(23), 184211. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1080/00224499.2012.658586.
Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., & Mitchell, K. J. (2012). How often are teens arrested for sexting? Data from a national sample of police cases. Pediatrics, 129(1), 412. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2242.
Yamamiya, Y., Cash, T. F., & Thompson, J. K. (2006). Sexual experiences among college women: The dierential eects of general versus contextual body images on
sexuality. Sex Roles, 55(56), 421427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9096-x.
D. Bianchi et al. Journal of Adolescence 61 (2017) 164–172
172
... These findings suggest that individuals in causal sexual relationships are not necessarily sexting to develop or improve intimacy for the potential of a continued relationship, as is commonly reported as a motivation of college students for engaging in casual sexual relationships (Garcia & Reiber, 2008), but to avoid adverse emotions or consequences. Additionally, experiential avoidance may overlap with instrumental/aggressive sexting motivations, which are distinct from relational motives and have been identified as the most detrimental motivations for sexting (Currin et al., 2020;Bianchi et al., 2017). Therefore, these motives may result in the greatest negative consequences and may explain why experiential avoidance sexting motivations are associated with negative reinforcement and punishment (Bianchi et al., 2017). ...
... Additionally, experiential avoidance may overlap with instrumental/aggressive sexting motivations, which are distinct from relational motives and have been identified as the most detrimental motivations for sexting (Currin et al., 2020;Bianchi et al., 2017). Therefore, these motives may result in the greatest negative consequences and may explain why experiential avoidance sexting motivations are associated with negative reinforcement and punishment (Bianchi et al., 2017). Given that experiential avoidance motives are likely an indicator of harm, our findings suggest that identifying experiential avoidance motives for sexting may offer potential points of intervention through comprehensive sexuality education. ...
... Experiential avoidance sexting motivations were associated with negative reinforcement and punishment but not with positive reinforcement. Less is known about experiential avoidance sexting motivations compared to relational sexting motivations, although experiential avoidance may overlap with instrumental/aggressive sexting motivations and are harmful motivations for sexting (Currin et al., 2020;Bianchi et al., 2017). Therefore, these motives may result in the greatest negative consequences which may provide an explanation that individual sexting motivations are associated with negative reinforcement and punishment (Bianchi et al., 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
As sexting continues to develop as a facet of sexual behavior among emerging adults, it is important to examine precursors and outcomes of such behavior. Current research is beginning to examine potential positive outcomes of consensual sex- ting in addition to negative consequences, as well as the motivations and contexts in which these consequences manifest. The purpose of the present study was to examine motivations for consensual sexting across gender and relationship status, as well as a range of perceived consequences of sexting in undergraduate emerging adults (N=536; 77.2% women). With regards to motivations for sexting, men and those in committed romantic relationships more frequently reported that their sexting was incited by relational motives compared to women and those in casual sexual relationships. In examining consequences of sexting, women reported higher levels of punishment compared to men. A significant interaction was present between gender and relationship status, revealing that women in casual sexual relationships reported the highest amounts of negative consequences. These findings highlight the complexity of sexting behaviors and suggest the need for more nuanced research to accurately conceptualize and contextualize the motivations for and the consequences of sexting as a function of relationship status and gender.
... As sexting is a sexual behavior, it logically follows then that there are affective and cognitive motivations that exist for engaging in sexting behavior. Motivations of sexting have been studied in both adolescents [18,19] and adults [12]. As originally described by Bianchi and colleagues [18], individuals sext for three main reasons: sexual purposes, body image reinforcement, and instrumental/aggravated reasons. ...
... Individuals who engage in sexting for sexual purposes are doing so for the ultimate goal of having sex with the person(s) whom they are sexting [18]. Individuals who engage in sexting for body image reinforcement are often dealing with anxiety about their appearance or status in the current relationship, and therefore sext to receive reassurance [1,[19][20][21]. Finally, individuals also are motivated to sext for more instrumental or aggravated reasons, which describes a collection of motivations that indicate a person is sexting for a reason other than wanting to have sex with the person whom they are sexting and/or they are not wanting to receive reinforcement about their body image. ...
... Interestingly though, for both men and women, neither negative or positive sexting expectancies were predicted by body image reinforcement reasons for sexting, regardless of whether a person was sending or receiving a sext message. This finding is somewhat unexpected, as previous research has documented that individuals will send nude or sexually suggestive images to partners to receive feedback about their appearance [12,19]. This is surprising in that individuals who sext for BIR may be doing so due to desiring affirmation of their appearance. ...
Article
Full-text available
While many researchers have explored the impact sexting may have on relationships and mental health, few have explored the motivations and expectancies as to why individuals engage in sexting. By understanding why individuals sext their partners, we can learn more about what drives the behavior. Therefore, the current study sought to determine if sexting for sexual purposes (SP) or body image reinforcement (BIR) would predict positive sext expectancies. There was no prediction for instrumental/aggravated reasons (IAR). The online questionnaire had 348 participants, and based on regression analysis, positive sext expectancies while sending a sext message predicted sex-ting for sexual purposes. Somewhat surprisingly, sexting for instrumental/aggravated reasons was predicted by negative sext expectancies (both sending and receiving). These findings demonstrate individuals who sext for sexual purposes, and have positive sext expectancies, appear to enjoy the consequences of that behavior. Individuals who sext for instrumental/aggravated reasons may be uncomfortable with the outcome of their sexting behavior. This result highlights an area where cli-nicians could help clients explore the true reinforcements behind IAR.
... One such factor is body appreciation. As body dissatisfaction develops and increases over time in adolescents (Eisenberg et al., 2006), sexting can become a way to obtain social reinforcement about the adequacy of their appearance (Bianchi et al., 2017). Yet although body dissatisfaction is associated with negative sexuality outcomes (e.g., Klettke et al., 2014), little research has examined how it may contribute to adolescents' sexting. ...
... In a study among 361 college students examining a model that included objectified body consciousness, comfort with nudity, and sexting (i.e., sexually explicit or nude photos), participants who sexted had higher levels of body dissatisfaction, while others had higher levels of comfort with nudity (Liong & Cheng, 2018). In a sample of 190 youth aged between 13 to 20, a cross-sectional study showed that regardless of gender, age, and sexual orientation, when adolescents compared their bodies against cultural standards, they were more likely to send sexts (i.e., sexually suggestive or provocative text messages, photos, or videos) to receive body image reinforcement (Bianchi et al., 2017). Lastly, in a study involving 147 women, when participants received or sent sexually explicit images, they experienced lesser dissatisfaction with their physical appearance. ...
... Indeed, adolescents who sext may be more likely to have lower self-esteem (Ybarra & Mitchell, 2014). Further, girls may experience greater pressure to send sexts (Howard et al., 2019) and may use sexting to experiment with different forms of sexual expression (O'Sullivan, 2014), with a view to increasing their popularity among their peers (Bianchi et al., 2017). Previous studies have found that adolescent girls have gained status when they had been asked for a picture of their bodies (Ringrose et al., 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
Sexting has become part of the repertoire of adolescents’ sexual behaviors, especially among those who identify as gender and sexually diverse. Whereas body dissatisfaction increases during adolescence and is associated with negative sexuality outcomes, little research has examined how body appreciation may contribute to adolescents’ sexting. The present study examined associations between body appreciation and sexting behaviors, and whether these differed by gender and sexual orientation, using path analysis in a sample of 2904 adolescents (Mage = 14.53; SD = 0.61) comprised of five groups: heterosexual cisgender and gender and sexually diverse boys (heterosexual cisgender = 1193; gender and sexually diverse = 157), heterosexual cisgender and gender and sexually diverse girls (heterosexual cisgender = 1152; gender and sexually diverse = 320), and non-binary adolescents (n = 18). Lower levels of body appreciation were associated with higher sexting frequency in heterosexual cisgender girls and gender and sexually diverse boys. Adolescents preoccupied with their appearance may use sexting for body image-related validation.
... Consensual forms of sexting seem to lead to safer outcomes, for adults and adolescents as well. In fact, studies in developmental psychology suggest that sexting can play a role in the development of sexual, relational and body image in adolescents (Bianchi et al., 2017;Temple et al., 2019). Furthermore, in the context of intimate relationships, sending sexts seems a way to increase passion or satisfaction, especially in a long-distance relationship (Weisskirch & Delevi, 2011). ...
... Thus, people dissatisfied with their overall appearance may find it easier to attract or arouse someone online than in face-to-face encounters, since they can show only the body parts they like the most (or dislike the less) through the pictures or the videos. Indeed, sexting allows people to guarantee control over body disclosure and test the partner's response (Bianchi et al., 2017). Future studies on the relationship between specific body parts satisfaction and sexual behaviours are therefore required to establish potential differences between online and offline contexts. ...
Article
Studies on sexting motivations have produced a wealth of data and valuable information, but the roles of potentially relevant psychological variables in predicting specific sexting motivations have rarely been investigated. This study aims to explore, in a sample of 587 Italian adults (Mage = 25.5; SD = 6), whether online moral disengagement, body dissatisfaction, and three psychosexual variables can predict different sexting motivations (i.e., body image reinforcement, sexual, and aggravated/instrumental motivations), and whether these reasons can predict different sexting behaviours, such as private sexting, sexts' dissemination, and posting own’ sexts online. A full Structural Equation Modeling analysis was carried out to explore the relationships between predictors of sexting motivations, sexting motivations, and sexting behaviours. Results showed that sending sexts privately was positively affected by all three sexting motivations. Posting own’ sexts online was only affected by body image reinforcement in a positive direction, whereas disseminating others’ sexts was only positively predicted by aggravated/instrumental reasons. In turn, body image reinforcement was positively affected by sexual preoccupation and negatively by body esteem. Sexual purposes were instead positively predicted by sexual esteem and sexual satisfaction and negatively by online moral disengagement and body esteem. Finally, aggravated/instrumental reasons were positively influenced by online moral disengagement and sexual preoccupation. Our study highlights the role of online moral disengagement in predicting aggravated/instrumental reasons, which lead to harmful or even illegal forms of sexting, and further supports the idea that aggravated and experimental sexting are two distinct behaviours, with distinct precursors.
... However, while previous research has suggested that the primary motivation is to initiate sex, participants also spoke of its role in reinforcing feelings of closeness and connection after sex. While sex-related reasons have been identified in research among young people, they tend to be listed among a wider set of motivations for engaging in the practice (Burkett 2015;Bianchi et al. 2017) . ...
Article
Sexting has generated considerable public and professional interest with concerns centring on young people, and potential harms to mental and sexual health. Little research thus far has explored the practice among adults and none has focused on the cultural norms relating to the emotional experience of sexting across different ages and genders. We conducted 40 semi-structured interviews with a diverse sample of adults aged 18-59 years in Britain on the role of digital technologies in participants' sexual lives. In this paper, we draw on the accounts of 34 people with experience of sexting. We identified three main themes in participants' accounts related to the emotional aspects of sexting: (1) trust, (2) desire/intimacy and (3) shame. Under each theme, we identified motivations, 'feeling rules', and examples of 'emotion work' relating to the self, the other and the dyad. We conclude that there are shared cultural norms that constitute what appropriate sexting should feel like. Interventions aiming to minimise harms arising from sexting need to build on commonly held cultural conventions regarding the 'rules of the game' concerning feelings as well as behaviours.
... Previous studies have addressed a number of factors that explain why adolescents engage in sexting, including sexual purposes (e.g., flirting, initiation of sexual activity, and sexual attention from the recipient) [7,8], body image reinforcement [9,10], being pressured ( [11]; Kopecký, 2011), or harming someone in exchange for favors or money and victimization and perpetration of sexting [8,12]. Sexual purposes increased with age, while body image reinforcement showed a quadratic trend, increasing from adolescence to early young adulthood and decreasing from early to late young adulthood [10]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Many sexting studies conducted in the Western cultures have shown that the percentage is higher in less traditional cultures. However, the generalizability of this phenomenon to non-Western cultures has not been extensively researched. The purpose of this study is to examine and explain cross-cultural differences in sexting behavior among subjects from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. A mixed methods approach was used. The first, qualitative phase included focus groups with two groups of high school students from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia (N = 57), aged 15 to 19. In the second, quantitative phase, questionnaires were sent to 440 young adults with an average age of 21 years (SD = 3:8). From the interviews with the young people, nonconsensual sexting was perceived as less beneficial. Sexting was viewed as a double standard. The quantitative study revealed gender and country differences in attitudes toward sexting and motives for sexting. Positive attitudes toward sexting were found to predict different forms of sexting motives in both samples. In the sample from Bosnia and Herzegovina, age was found to predict sexting with instrumental motives and body image reinforcement motives. Gender, on the other hand, was found to be predictive of instrumental sexting motives in the Croatian sample and body image reinforcement sexting motives in the Bosnia and Herzegovina sample. This study illustrates the value of cross-cultural approaches combined with mixed methods as a design to study sexting behavior.
... One study found physical distance from a partner as a motivator to sext , suggesting it is used to feel intimate and connected while separated from a partner by physical distance. Other research identified various sexting motivators, including relational attachment, body image reinforcement, and instrumental/aggravated reasons (Bianchi et al., 2017;Currin & Hubach, 2019;Bianchi et al., 2021;Drouin & Landgraff, 2012). Recently, research shifted to looking at motivators of unsolicited sexting; receiving unsolicited sexts are correlated with higher levels of depression, anxiety, stress symptoms, lower self-esteem, and distress levels (Klettke et al., 2019;Valiukas et al., 2019). ...
Article
With the majority of individuals in the United States owning a mobile device, communicating via text is popular. Many individuals who text also engage in sexting, commonly defined as sending a sexually suggestive or explicit message that can include a nude image. In September of 2019, Texas passed a law prohibiting the sending of an unsolicited nude image without consent from the receiver. The goal of the study was to capture the reactions of individuals to this state law. There were 400 different responses by 400 different individuals posted on Reddit by users expressing their reactions to the passing of the state law. Initial reactions were captured, chosen from specific Reddit threads containing the link to the law within 1 month of the law being passed. These comments were collected and the research team used thematic analysis to highlight the themes to users’ responses to the sexting law. Of note was the sizeable number of individuals who disapproved of the law, highlighting a lack of knowledge about consent to engage in sexual behaviors in general, the need to gain consent to engage in sexting, and a misunderstanding of what defines sexual harassment. Implications for sex education programs and policy makers are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: According to the objectification framework, media pressure toward body models promotes the internalization of beauty ideals that negatively influence individuals' body image and self-esteem. Historically, women have been the main target of sociocultural pressures. However, research has recently suggested that self-objectification is a male phenomenon as well, which can be inscribed in men's body experiences. Nevertheless, fewer studies have specifically focused on the male experience and general consequences of body-objectification are yet to be extensively analyzed regarding males' body image features. The current cross-sectional study explores the consequences of body-objectification on male body esteem, specifically testing the predictive role of exercising/dietary habits, body-objectification features, and SNS-related practices on male body esteem. Method: A total of 238 male participants (mean age = 24.28 years, SD = 4.32) have been involved in an online survey. Three hierarchical analyses were performed to test the influence of objectified body consciousness and social networking-related experiences (i.e. Instagram intensity use, photo manipulation, selfie feedback investment) on young men's body esteem with specific reference to the weight, appearance, and attribution features of the Body Esteem Scale. Results: Findings highlighted that body shame played an interesting key role, influencing negatively all the body esteem dimensions, thus highlighting that attention needs to be deserved on this feature of OBC regarding males' experience. On the contrary, appearance control-related dimensions positively influenced body esteem. Overall, findings confirmed that objectification theory can adequately mark a pathway by which media imagery is internalized also by men and may negatively affect their body esteem. Conclusions: Despite some limitations, this study may contribute to enlarging our knowledge on male body image and self-objectification experience and support literature shattering the stereotype that body dissatisfaction is a "female-exclusive" issue. Likewise, beyond some questioning positions, these findings also encourage further exploration of a healthier "control dimension", including body appearance-related activities and beliefs.
Experiment Findings
Full-text available
Prvi izvještaj (2021.) znanstvenoistraživačkog projekta: "Priroda i odrednice sekstinga među adolescentima i mladima: kroskulturalno istraživanje (SextYouth)"
Article
Full-text available
Napredak tehnologije u zadnjih dvadesetak godina nedvojbeno je promijenio način života pa tako i način odrastanja djece i mladih, a uporaba interneta postala je sastavnim dijelom svakodnevnih životnih aktivnosti. Korištenje modernim tehnologijama, osobito u okviru rizičnih online aktivnosti, u ovom će radu biti razmotreno kao rizik u kontekstu odrastanja, a od rizičnih ponašanja razmatrat će se seksting (engl. sexting), odnosno izmjenjivanje seksualnih sadržaja, seksualna prisila i iznuda (engl. sextortion) kao iznuđivanje seksualnih sadržaja te vrbovanje ili mamljenje (engl. grooming) kao zavođenje ili namamljivanje maloljetne osobe. Svi rizici bit će detaljno analizirani u kontekstu seksualnog zlostavljanja i iskorištavanja putem interneta međusobnom povezanošću, razmatranjem posljedica kao i ulogom stručnjaka iz multikulturalne perspektive. Razvoj modernih tehnologija, kao i mogućnosti koje donosi, posebno u pandemiji, predstavljaju plodno tlo za ozbiljne prijetnje mentalnom zdravlju djece i mladih, ali i postavljaju zahtjeve pred sve one koji se bave zaštitom djece i mladih da kreiraju i razvijaju nove sustave zaštite djece.
Article
Full-text available
Sexting is the exchange of sexually suggestive contents via Internet, Smartphone, and Social Networking Websites. Recently, the research on sexting motivations increased in order to distinguish between experimental and aggravated sexting. This study investigated individual correlates of three sexting motivations: sexual purposes, instrumental/aggravated reasons, and body image reinforcement. The study involved 488 adolescents and young adults aged from 14 to 30 years. Sexual purposes and body image reinforcement were the most commonly reported motivations for sexting. Boys reported more instrumental/aggravated reasons, and sexual minorities reported more sexual purposes and body image reinforcement. Sexual purposes increased with age, while body image reinforcement showed a quadratic trend, increasing from adolescence to early young adulthood, and decreasing from early to late young adulthood. Finally, participants who have already had first sex reported more sexual purposes. Research, clinical and educational implications are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Recent neuroscience models of adolescent brain development attribute the morbidity and mortality of this period to structural and functional imbalances between more fully developed limbic regions that subserve reward and emotion as opposed to those that enable cognitive control. We challenge this interpretation of adolescent development by distinguishing risk-taking that peaks during adolescence (sensation seeking and impulsive action) from risk taking that declines monotonically from childhood to adulthood (impulsive choice and other decisions under known risk). Sensation seeking is primarily motivated by exploration of the environment under ambiguous risk contexts, while impulsive action, which is likely to be maladaptive, is more characteristic of a subset of youth with weak control over limbic motivation. Risk taking that declines monotonically from childhood to adulthood occurs primarily under conditions of known risks and reflects increases in executive function as well as aversion to risk based on increases in gist-based reasoning. We propose an alternative Life-span Wisdom Model that highlights the importance of experience gained through exploration during adolescence. We propose, therefore, that brain models that recognize the adaptive roles that cognition and experience play during adolescence provide a more complete and helpful picture of this period of development.
Article
Full-text available
There has been a lack of research into the motivations for sexting. This study presents a self report instrument, the Sexting Motivations Questionnaire (SMQ), evaluating three sexting motivations: sexual purposes, instrumental/aggravated reasons and body image reinforcement. We also investigated which sexting motivations predict different sexting behaviors, distinguishing between experimental and more harmful sexting. The study involved 509 participants aged from 13 to 35 (Mage = 21.4; SDage = 4.6; 63.7% females) who reported having sent sexts during the last year. Explorative factor analysis revealed three factors: sexual purposes, instrumental/aggravated reasons, and body image reinforcement. The results showed that sexual purposes were the most frequently reported, followed by body image reinforcement, and instrumental/aggravated reasons were reported in low but alarming percentages. Only instrumental/aggravated reasons turned out to predict more harmful sexting behaviors, such as publicly posting own sexts and the socalled ‘not allowed sharing’ of a partner’s sexts. These motivations could lead to aggravated sexting. Our findings confirmed the good reliability and criterion validity of the SMQ, a new instrument for assessing sexting motivations in young people.
Article
Full-text available
The present study investigated whether engaging in sexy self-presentations on social network sites (SNSs) or exposure to sexy self-presentations on SNSs predicts the willingness to engage in sexting. A second aim of the present study was to investigate whether adolescent girls demonstrate stronger relationships between (exposure to) sexy online self-presentations on SNSs and willingness to sext than adolescent boys and young adult men and women. A two-wave panel survey among 953 Dutch adolescents (13–17 years old, 50.7% male) and 899 Dutch young adults (18–25 years old, 43.9% male) showed that engaging in sexy self-presentations on SNSs increased the willingness to engage in sexting, but only among adolescent girls. Exposure to sexy self-presentations of others did not predict the willingness to engage in sexting. The findings call for more research on the role of gender and age in the link between sexy self-presentation and sexting.
Article
Full-text available
Sexting is defined as the exchange of provocative or sexually explicit content via smartphone, Internet, or social networks. Previous studies found a relationship between cyber pornography and sexting. The present study aimed to investigate the relationships between sexting, cyber pornography, and alcohol consumption. Previous evidence underlined the disinhibitory effect of alcohol on sexual responsiveness. Therefore, the possible moderating role of alcohol consumption was investigated in the relationship between cyber pornography addiction and sexting. The Sexting Behaviors Questionnaire, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, and the Cyber Pornography Use Inventory were administered to 610 adolescents (63 % females; mean age = 16.8). Boys reported significantly more sexting, alcohol consumption, and cyber pornography addiction than girls. As expected, sexting was robustly correlated with alcohol consumption and cyber pornography. In line with these expectations, we found that the relationship between cyber pornography and sexting was moderated by different level of alcohol consumption. In those who reported low levels of alcohol consumption, the relationship between cyber pornography and sexting was not significant. On the contrary, in those who reported high alcohol consumption, this relationship was stronger and significant. Thus, the results suggest that alcohol restraint could represent a protective factor against engaging in sexting, even in the presence of high cyber pornography addiction.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Sexting is the exchange of sexually explicit or provocative content (text messages, photos, and videos) via smartphone, Internet, or social networks. Recent evidence enlightened its relationships with several risk and aggressive behaviors. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the amount of sexting, psychological distress, and dating violence in adolescents and young adults. Method: The study involved 1,334 participants (68% females; mean age = 20.8) who completed a survey containing Kinsey Scale, Sexting Behavior Questionnaire, Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory, and General Health Questionnaire. Results: Results showed gender and sexual orientation differences: Males (vs. females) did more sexting, while non-heterosexuals (vs. heterosexuals) were more involved in sexting. Moreover, high/moderate users of sexting committed more offline and online dating violence. Regarding psychological distress, no differences were found between high and low/moderate users of sexting. Conclusions: Results suggested that moderate and high use of sexting could be a risk factor for some problematic behaviors such as dating violence, even if there is not a relationship with anxiety and depression symptoms.
Book
Carrying forward his inquiry into the nature and conditions of normal and abnormal development, Lichtenberg focuses on motivation. His goal is to offer an alternative to psychoanalytic drive theory that accommodates the developmental insights of infancy research while accounting for the entire range of phenomena addressed by the theory of instinctual drives. To this end, he propounds a comprehensive theory of the self, which then gains expression in five discrete yet interactive motivational systems.