Content uploaded by Ben Hammond
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ben Hammond on Nov 05, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2016 | JOURNAL OF FITNESS RESEARCH 68
ISSN 2201-5655 © 2016, Australian Institute of Fitness
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
:<9-(*,,3,*;964@6.9(7/@
(5(3@:0:6-;/,-9,,:40;/(5+:730;
:8<(;:7,9-694,+)@:;9,5.;/
;9(05,+4(3,:
,YPJ*OH\OHU*YHPN)YPKNL)LUQHTPU/HTTVUK7HZJ\HS4HYX\LZ)Y\UH
-HJ\S[`VM(Y[Z:JPLUJLZ,KNL/PSS<UP]LYZP[`
*VYYLZWVUKPUN(\[OVY!7HZJ\HS4HYX\LZ)Y\UH
-HJ\S[`VM(Y[Z:JPLUJLZ,KNL/PSS<UP]LYZP[`:[/LSLU»Z9VHK6YTZRPYR3 87<UP[LK2PUNKVT
;LS! "-H_!
,THPS!THYX\LZW'LKNLOPSSHJ\R
ABSTRACT
0U[YVK\J[PVU!:X\H[ZYLJY\P[HSHYNLWYVWVY[PVUVM[OLIVK`»ZT\ZJ\SHYZ`Z[LTHUKWYV]PKLHMV\UKH[PVU
MVYZ[YLUN[O[YHPUPUNWYVNYHTZMVYH[OSL[LZ/V^L]LYV\Y\UKLYZ[HUKPUNVMLSLJ[YVT`VNYHWOPJHSHJ[P]P[`
PU]HYPH[PVUZVM[OLOPNOIHYIHJRZX\H[UV[HIS`[OLZWSP[ZX\H[PZSPTP[LK;OLYLMVYL[OPZZ[\K`HPTZ[V
PU]LZ[PNH[LZ\YMHJLLSLJ[YVT`VNYHWO`,4.PU[OLMYLL:TP[OHUKZWSP[[`WLZVMZX\H[
4L[OVK!(YHUKVTPZLKZHTWSLVMOLHS[O`Z[YLUN[O[YHPULKTHSLZTLHU:+HNL`LHYZ"
OLPNO[T"THZZ RN"Z[YLUN[O[YHPUPUN`LHYZWLYMVYTLKYLWL[P[PVUZVMLHJO
[`WLVMZX\H[H[VM[OLPYVULYLWL[P[PVUTH_PT\T(5VYH_VU,4.9H_VUZ`Z[LT^HZ\ZLK[VJVSSLJ[
WLHR,4.YVV[TLHUZX\HYL,4.94:,4.HUKPU[LNYH[LK,4.P,4.KH[HMVY[OLLJJLU[YPJHUK
JVUJLU[YPJWOHZLZVM[OLZX\H[,4.KH[HMYVT[OLMYLLHUKZWSP[ZX\H[Z^LYLUVYTHSPZLK[V[OL:TP[O
ZX\H[;^V^H`(56=(Z^LYL\ZLKMVY[OLHUHS`ZPZVM[`WLVMZX\H[HUKWOHZLVMZX\H[W
Results::[H[PZ[PJHSS`ZPNUPÄJHU[LɈLJ[ZMVY[`WLVMZX\H[^LYLMV\UKMVYWLHR,4.HUKP,4.VM[OLIPJLW
MLTVYPZ)-SH[LYHSNHZ[YVJULTP\Z3.HUK[PIPHSPZHU[LYPVYWHUKMVY94:,4.VM[OL)-
W$HUK3.W$:PNUPÄJHU[KPɈLYLUJLZPUWOHZLVMZX\H[^LYLMV\UKMVYWLHR,4.HUK94:
,4.VM)-W$
Discussion:;OLZWSP[ZX\H[LSPJP[LKOPNOLY)-HUK3.T\ZJSLHJ[P]P[`JVTWHYLK[V[OLMYLLHUK:TP[O
ZX\H[Z;OLÄUKPUNZZ\NNLZ[[OH[[OLZWSP[ZX\H[LɈLJ[P]LS`Z[PT\SH[LZ[OL)-HUK3.T\ZJSLZHUKZOV\SK
JVUZLX\LU[S`MVYTHUPU[LNYHSWHY[VMZ[YLUN[OWYVNYHTZMVYH[OSL[LZ
2L`^VYKZ!)PJLWZMLTVYPZ3H[LYHS.HZ[YVJULTP\Z4\ZJSLHJ[P]P[`:X\H[[`WL:[YLUN[OHUKJVUKP[PVUPUN
Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2016 | JOURNAL OF FITNESS RESEARCH 69
INTRODUCTION
The barbell back squat provides a functional
transfer into numerous sporting movements and it is
the predominant exercise in strength programs 1
3UHYLRXVUHVHDUFKFRQÀUPVWKHHIIHFWLYHQHVVRI WKH
bilateral barbell squat in developing maximal strength
and power of the lower extremities in athletes 2-5
6SHFLÀFDOO\WKHVTXDWKDVEHHQUHSRUWHGWRLPSURYH
speed and acceleration in sprinting, and performance
in countermovement jumps 6-97KHOLWHUDWXUH
contains extensive research on squat depth, foot
placement, and muscle activation in the two-legged
squat 10; however, the biomechanics of the split squat
DUHOHVVZHOOXQGHUVWRRG
3RSXODUIRUPVRI WKHVTXDWLQFOXGHWKHIUHH6PLWK
DQGVSOLWVTXDWV$6PLWKPDFKLQHFRQVWUDLQVWKH
squat movement to a straight-line translatory motion
of a barbell guided by a set of rails 11,QFRQWUDVW
WKHIUHHVTXDWHQWDLOVDOHVVVWDEOHPRWLRQ In fact, it
has been put forward that the free squat involves
higher levels of hip and knee stabilisation which
EHQHÀWLQGLYLGXDOVWKDWDLPWRVWUHQJWKHQWKHKLSDQG
NQHHPXVFXODWXUHFRPSDUHGWRWKH6PLWKVTXDW12
7KHHOHFWURP\RJUDSK\(0*UHVHDUFKFRQGXFWHG
E\6FKZDQEHFNet al12 evaluated the discrepancies in
lower limb muscle function between the free and the
6PLWKVTXDW7KHURRWPHDQVTXDUH(0*506
(0*DFWLYLW\ZDVVLJQLÀFDQWO\JUHDWHUE\LQWKH
vastus medialis oblique902LQWKHbiceps
femoris%)DQGLQWKHlateral gastrocnemius
/*LQKHDOWK\PDOHVGXULQJWKHIUHHVTXDW
FRPSDUHGWRWKH6PLWKVTXDW127KHGLVWDO
DWWDFKPHQWRI WKH/*FURVVHVWKHDQNOHMRLQWDQGWKH
proximal attachment crosses the knee joint, and both
WKH/*DQGVROHXVEHFRPHPRUHDFWLYHLQXQVWDEOH
movements such as the free squat 127KHOLWHUDWXUH
VXJJHVWVWKDWJUHDWHU(0*DFWLYLW\LVQHFHVVDU\WR
stabilise the ankle, knee and hip joints in the free
squat, and that the free squat is more advantageous
WKDQWKH6PLWKVTXDWIRUVWUHQJWKHQLQJWKHKLSDQG
NQHHH[WHQVRUVDQGSODQWDUÁH[RUV12
$QDGYDQWDJHRI XVLQJD6PLWKPDFKLQHWR
perform squats is that less experience in strength
training with barbells and coordination are required
FRPSDUHGWRXVLQJDIUHHEDUEHOO7KLVPDNHVWKH
6PLWKPDFKLQHSRSXODUDPRQJVWUHFUHDWLRQDOVSRUWV
participants 13+RZHYHUVXEVWDQWLDOLQFUHDVHVLQ
strength and power have been achieved through the
use of the free back squat 17KHUHLVGLIIHUHQFHRI
opinion amongst strength and conditioning coaches
UHJDUGLQJWKHHIIHFWLYHQHVVRI 6PLWKPDFKLQHV,WKDV
been suggested that because the motion of the
EDUEHOOLQWKH6PLWKPDFKLQHLVFRQVWUDLQHGWRD
straight line it may increase the risk of injury as this
is not a natural movement 14$OVRWKHOLWHUDWXUH
SUHVHQWVLQFRQFOXVLYHUHVHDUFKÀQGLQJVLQPXVFOH
UHFUXLWPHQWLQWKHIUHHDQG6PLWKVTXDWVZKLFKFDQ
be attributed to methodological differences in squat
technique, stance width, squat depth, and foot
positioning 12,15)RUH[DPSOH3DROLet al16 found that
a wide stance elicits a greater recruitment of the
JOXWHXVPD[LPXVDQGKDPVWULQJVLQWKHEDFNVTXDW
$QLPSRUWDQWFRQVLGHUDWLRQUHJDUGLQJPXVFOH
recruitment is related to barbell positioning 17,QWKH
high-bar back squat the barbell is placed on top of
the trapezius muscles, whereas in the low-bar back
squat the bar is positioned lower on the back just
above the spine of the scapula and immediately
DERYHWKHUHDUGHOWRLGV7KHKLJKEDUVTXDWSURPSWV
the athlete to adopt a more upright trunk posture
which elicits a greater contribution from the
quadriceps 17,QWKHORZEDUWHFKQLTXHWKHWRUVRLV
bent further forward in order to keep the bar over
WKHPLGIRRW/RZEDUVTXDWWLQJDFWLYDWHVWKH
hamstrings and gluteus more intensely and usually
allows lifting heavier weights, therefore setting
appropriate conditions to develop greater muscular
SRZHU(YDOXDWLRQRI WKHOLWHUDWXUHSRLQWVWRWKHQHHG
IRUIXUWKHUUHVHDUFKWKDWH[SORUHV(0*PXVFOH
DFWLYDWLRQSDWWHUQVLQGLIIHUHQWW\SHVRI VTXDW
/RZHUERG\VWUHQJWKDQGFRQGLWLRQLQJURXWLQHV
place an emphasis on bilateral squatting, however
athletes perform many sporting movements
unilaterally 18,19 5HVHDUFKKDVVKRZQWKDWXQLODWHUDO
exercises increase stimulation of the neuromuscular
system to stabilise the musculature of the trunk and
KLS8QLODWHUDOH[HUFLVHVUHTXLUHDGYDQFHGVWDELOLW\
and control in the athlete, often causing a reduction
of lifted loads and power output during strength
training 207KXVWKHUHLVGLVDJUHHPHQWDPRQJVW
strength and conditioning coaches regarding the
importance of bilateral and unilateral exercises to
Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2016 | JOURNAL OF FITNESS RESEARCH 70
LPSURYHDWKOHWLFSHUIRUPDQFH6DHWHUEDNNHQDQG
)LPODQG21 explained that the split squat helps
develop the lateral subsystem, described as the
frontal plane stabilisation provided by the lumbo-
pelvic-hip muscle complex responsible for
transferring force between the lower and upper body
GXULQJVLQJOHOHJPRYHPHQWSDWWHUQV7KHPDLQ
muscles engaged in the lateral subsystem include the
gluteus medius, hip adductors and quadratus
OXPERUXPZKLFKVKRZKLJKHU(0*DFWLYLW\ZKHQ
performing unilateral exercises 223UHYLRXVUHVHDUFK
suggests that unilateral training such as the split squat
stimulates the lateral subsystem musculature and may
HOLFLWKLJKHU(0*DFWLYLW\WKDQELODWHUDOVTXDWV
7KH(0*DFWLYLW\LQWKHIUHHEDFNVTXDWVUHDUOHJ
elevated split squats, and split squats has been
SUHYLRXVO\LQYHVWLJDWHGE\GH)RUHVWet al237KH
muscles studied included the gluteus maximus%)
semitendinosus, rectus femoris, vastus lateralis
REOLTXH9/2902WLELDOLVDQWHULRU7$DQG
PHGLDOJDVWURFQHPLXVIURPWKHIURQWOHJLQXQLODWHUDO
VTXDWV0XVFOHDFWLYLW\ZDVVLPLODUEHWZHHQIUHHDQG
VSOLWVTXDWVDSDUWIURPDFWLYLW\RI WKH%)7KH%)
muscle showed considerably higher activation in the
free squat than in the split squat during the
concentric phase of the exercise with a mean
GLIIHUHQFHRI P9,QFRQWUDVWUHVHDUFK
FRQGXFWHGE\/RQJSUHet al24 found that the
quadriceps yields higher activation in the lunge
exercise compared to the free squat in healthy young
IHPDOHV,QGHSWKXQGHUVWDQGLQJRI (0*DFWLYLW\LQ
different types of squat may assist in designing
VWUHQJWKSURJUDPVWKDWIXUWKHUUHFUXLWWKH%)WR
reduce antagonistic muscular imbalances and injury
risk in athletes 8,14
There is limited kinesiological insight into how
(0*DFWLYLW\GLIIHUVEHWZHHQELODWHUDODQGXQLODWHUDO
VTXDWW\SHV7KHUHIRUHWKHDLPRI WKLVVWXG\ZDVWR
HYDOXDWH(0*DFWLYLW\LQWKHIUHH6PLWKDQGVSOLW
VTXDWV6SHFLÀFREMHFWLYHVLQFOXGHGDVVHVVPHQWRI
SHDN(0*506(0*DQGLQWHJUDWHG(0*
L(0*IRUWKHWKUHHW\SHVRI VTXDWDQGWKHWZR
SKDVHVRI WKHPRYHPHQWHFFHQWULFDQGFRQFHQWULF
7KHSHDN(0*LVWKHSHDNDPSOLWXGHRI WKH(0*
signal which represents a measure of the maximal
DFWLYLW\RI DJLYHQPXVFOHGXULQJDQH[HUFLVH7KH
506(0*LVGHÀQHGDVWKHVTXDUHURRWRI WKH
DYHUDJHSRZHURI WKHUDZ(0*ZKLFKUHÁHFWVWKH
level of the physiological activity in the motor unit
GXULQJPXVFOHFRQWUDFWLRQ7KHL(0*LVWKH
PDWKHPDWLFDOLQWHJUDORI WKHUHFWLÀHG(0*VLJQDO
that provides an estimate of the total amount of
muscle activity 257KHÀQGLQJVRI WKLVVWXG\PD\
provide practical information for coaches and
athletes to optimise strength programs, promote
antagonistic muscle balance, prevent injury, and
HQKDQFHRXUXQGHUVWDQGLQJRI (0*VSDWLRWHPSRUDO
and co-activation characteristics of lower-limb
PXVFOHVLQWKHIUHH6PLWKDQGVSOLWVTXDWV
METHODS
Experimental Design
This study consisted of an experimental repeated
measures design using strength trained males chosen
at random in which the participants performed one
VHWRI UHSHWLWLRQVRI WKHIUHH6PLWKDQGVSOLW
squats at a parallel depth using a load of 75% of the
SDUWLFLSDQWV·RQHUHSHWLWLRQPD[LPXP5026,277KH
SDUWLFLSDQWV·50ORDGVZHUHHVWDEOLVKHGRQHZHHN
SULRUWRGDWDFROOHFWLRQDFFRUGLQJWRWKH$PHULFDQ
&ROOHJHRI 6SRUWV0HGLFLQH28 50SURWRFRO6WDUW
ZLWKUHSHWLWLRQVDWSHUFHLYHG²50UHVW
IRUPLQSHUIRUPUHSHWLWLRQVDW²50
UHVWIRUPLQVDGG²OEVNJDQG
SHUIRUPDVLQJOHUHS,I WKHODWWHUDWWHPSWLV
successful, then rest for 3-5 mins and continue
DGGLQJ²OEVXQWLODIDLOHGDWWHPSWRFFXUV
5HFRUGWKHODVWVXFFHVVIXOO\FRPSOHWHGOLIWDVWKH
50'DWDFROOHFWLRQZDVFDUULHGRXWXQGHU
FRQWUROOHGODERUDWRU\FRQGLWLRQV7KHRUGHURI
performance of squat type was randomised to
FRQWUROWKHHIIHFWVRI IDWLJXHRQ(0*PXVFOH
DFWLYDWLRQSDWWHUQV7KHGHSHQGHQWYDULDEOHZDV
muscle EMG activity7KHLQGHSHQGHQWYDULDEOHV
included type-of-squat and phase-of-squat([WUDQHRXV
variables encompassed cross-talk, individual variations
in posture when lifting, and unrelated voluntary
contractions 256WDQGDUGLVHGVTXDWLQVWUXFWLRQVZHUH
implemented 27
Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2016 | JOURNAL OF FITNESS RESEARCH 71
Participants
7HQKHDOWK\VWUHQJWKWUDLQHGPDOHVRI PHDQ6'
DJHRI \HDUVKHLJKWRI PDQG
PDVVRI NJSDUWLFLSDWHGLQWKHVWXG\7KH
participants were three 100m sprinters, three rugby
SOD\HUVDQGIRXUIRRWEDOOSOD\HUVRI XQLYHUVLW\OHYHO
The participants trained for their sport two times per
week and were experienced in using a variety of
VTXDWVIRUVWUHQJWKWUDLQLQJ7KH\ZHUHIUHHIURP
injury at the time of testing and had no history of
ORZHUEDFNRUORZHUOLPELQMXULHV)RUKRXUVSULRU
to data collection the participants did not take part in
DQ\VSRUWRUVWUHQJWKWUDLQLQJ7KLVHQVXUHGWKHLU
muscles were fully recovered from previous training
sessions and prevented delayed onset of muscle
VRUHQHVVIURPLQÁXHQFLQJWKHLQGLYLGXDO·VOLIWLQJ
technique 285LVNDVVHVVPHQWVZHUHHYDOXDWHGSULRU
to data collection and all participants provided
LQIRUPHGFRQVHQWIRUSDUWLFLSDWLRQ7KHVWXG\ZDV
DSSURYHGE\WKH,QVWLWXWLRQV·(WKLFV&RPPLWWHH
Electromyography Procedures
$1RUD[RQ(0*5D[RQV\VWHP1RUD[RQ86$
LQF$UL]RQD86$ZDVXVHGWRHYDOXDWHWKH902
9/2%)/*DQG7$ZKLFKDUHWKHSUHGRPLQDQW
muscles in the execution of squats 273UHSDUDWLRQRI
the skin overlying the muscle sites was carried out by
cleaning the skin with alcohol wipes, shaving with a
razor and lightly abrading the skin with sand paper 25
'LVNVKDSHGPPSUHJHOOHGHOHFWURGHVZHUH
attached to the skin overlying the centre of the belly
RI WKHPXVFOHVRI WKHULJKWOHJ3ODFHPHQWRI WKH
electrodes was as follows 29
902²/RFDWLRQ(OHFWURGHVSODFHGDWRQ
the line between the anterior spina iliaca superior and
the joint space in front of the anterior border of the
PHGLDOOLJDPHQW2ULHQWDWLRQ$OPRVWSHUSHQGLFXODU
to the line between the anterior superior iliac spine
and the joint space in front of the anterior border of
WKHPHGLDOOLJDPHQW
9/2²/RFDWLRQ(OHFWURGHVSODFHGDWRQWKH
line from the anterior superior iliac spine to the
ODWHUDOVLGHRI WKHSDWHOOD2ULHQWDWLRQ,QWKH
GLUHFWLRQRI WKHPXVFOHÀEUHV
%)²/RFDWLRQ(OHFWURGHVSODFHGDWRQWKH
line between the ischial tuberosity and the lateral
HSLFRQG\OHRI WKHWLELD2ULHQWDWLRQ,QWKHGLUHFWLRQ
of the line between the ischial tuberosity and the
ODWHUDOHSLFRQG\OHRI WKHWLELD
/*²/RFDWLRQ(OHFWURGHVSODFHGDWRI WKH
OLQHEHWZHHQWKHKHDGRI WKHÀEXODDQGWKHKHHO
2ULHQWDWLRQ,QWKHGLUHFWLRQRI WKHOLQHEHWZHHQWKH
KHDGRI WKHÀEXODDQGWKHKHHO
7$²/RFDWLRQ(OHFWURGHVSODFHGDWRQWKH
OLQHEHWZHHQWKHWLSRI WKHÀEXODDQGWKHWLSRI WKH
PHGLDOPDOOHROXV2ULHQWDWLRQ,QWKHGLUHFWLRQRI WKH
OLQHEHWZHHQWKHWLSRI WKHÀEXODDQGWKHWLSRI WKH
PHGLDOPDOOHROXV
The muscles of the right leg were analysed in all
WKUHHW\SHVRI VTXDWV7KHIURQWOHJLQWKHVSOLWVTXDWV
ZDVWKHULJKWOHJ7ZRELRWDEHOHFWURGHVZHUHSODFHG
DORQJWKHGLUHFWLRQRI WKHPXVFOHÀEUHVZLWKDQ
LQWHUHOHFWURGHGLVWDQFHRI PP$[
SUHDPSOLÀHUZDVSRVLWLRQHGDGMDFHQWWRWKH
electrode recording sites secured with double sided
tape to prevent the short wires from moving and
DGGLQJQRLVHWRWKH(0*VLJQDO7KHWHOHPHWULF
PRGXOHVWUDQVPLWWHGWKHVXUIDFH(0*VLJQDOVWRD
UHFHLYHU1RUD[RQ7HOHP\R'766\VWHP1RUD[RQ
86$LQF$UL]RQD86$WKDWZDVFRQQHFWHGWRD
SHUVRQDOFRPSXWHU7RHQVXUHRSWLPDOWUDQVIHURI WKH
(0*VLJQDOYLD:L)LWKH(0*V\VWHPLQLWLDOO\
KLJKSDVVÀOWHUHGWKHGDWDDW+]DQGWKHQORZ
SDVVÀOWHUHGDW+]7KHUHFRUGHG(0*VLJQDOV
were analysed using the manufacturer’s software
0\R5HVHDUFK1RUD[RQ86$7KHTXDOLW\DQG
VWDELOLW\RI WKH(0*VLJQDODQGWKHSUHVHQFHRI
cross-talk were assessed 25
Execution of the Squats
The participants performed the high-bar back free,
6PLWKDQGVSOLWVTXDWVXVLQJFURVVWUDLQHUVSRUWV
shoes for consistency among the participants and to
UHSOLFDWHWKHLUXVXDOVWUHQJWKWUDLQLQJHQYLURQPHQW
,QWKHIUHHDQG6PLWKVTXDWVWKH\XVHGWKHVTXDW
WHFKQLTXHPRGHOLOOXVWUDWHGE\%DHFKOHDQG(DUOH27
6TXDWGHSWKFKDUDFWHULVHGE\WKLJKVSDUDOOHOWRWKH
ground, shoulder width stance, unrestricted knee
forward displacement relative to the toes, and push
WKURXJKWKHKHHOV7KHSHUIRUPDQFHRI WKHVSOLW
VTXDWLVLOOXVWUDWHGLQÀJXUH7KHIUHHDQGVSOLW
VTXDWVZHUHH[HFXWHGXVLQJDQ2O\PSLFNJEDUEHOO
Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2016 | JOURNAL OF FITNESS RESEARCH 72
DQGD/LIH)LWQHVV+DPPHU6WUHQJWKVTXDWUDFN
/LIH)LWQHVV(O\&DPEULGJHVKLUH8.7KHPDVVRI
WKH6PLWKEDUZDVNJXQORDGHG7KH6PLWKVTXDW
ZDVSHUIRUPHGXVLQJD/LIH)LWQHVV+DPPHU6WUHQJWK
EDFNZDUGLQFOLQHG6PLWKPDFKLQH7KH
SDUWLFLSDQWVXVHGWKHLULQGLYLGXDO50ORDG7KH
PHDQ6'50RI WKHSDUWLFLSDQWVZDV
NJLQWKHIUHHVTXDWNJLQWKH
6PLWKVTXDWDQGNJLQWKHVSOLWVTXDW
'DWDFROOHFWLRQZDVDVIROORZV$IUHHVTXDWZDUPXS
ZDVÀUVWFRPSOHWHGXVLQJVHWVRI UHSHWLWLRQVDW
RI 506XEVHTXHQWO\RQHVHWRI UHSHWLWLRQV
ZLWKDORDGRI RI 50ZHUHSHUIRUPHGIRU
(0*UHFRUGLQJ$OOVTXDWVZHUHSHUIRUPHGRQWKH
VDPHGD\XVLQJDUDQGRPLVHGRUGHURI VTXDWW\SH
Participants were allowed 3-5 mins of rest between
each squat to prevent fatigue affecting the validity of
WKH(0*GDWD287KHVTXDWZDVSHUIRUPHGLQDVORZ
DQGFRQWUROOHGPDQQHU7KHERWWRPRIWKHVTXDW
FULWHULRQZDVPRQLWRUHGE\DTXDOLÀHGVWUHQJWKDQG
conditioning coach using visual observation to
PRQLWRUWKDWWKHWKLJKVZHUHSDUDOOHOZLWKWKH
JURXQGÀJXUH
EMG Signal Processing
7KHUDZ(0*VLJQDOVZHUHDPSOLÀHGDQGÀOWHUHG
XVLQJDQDQDORJXHWRGLJLWDOFRQYHUWHU7KHYDULDEOHV
FROOHFWHGLQFOXGHGSHDN(0*506(0*DQG
L(0*ZKLFKZHUHFDOFXODWHGRYHUWKHWLPHZLQGRZV
for the concentric and eccentric phases of the squat
separately 25'DWDZHUHDYHUDJHGIRUWULDOVRI HDFK
squat type 259DOXHVRI SHDN(0*506(0*DQG
L(0*IRUWKHIUHHDQGVSOLWVTXDWVZHUHQRUPDOLVHG
DVDSHUFHQWDJHRI WKHYDOXHVIRUWKH6PLWKVTXDW
ZKHUHWKH6PLWKVTXDWLVFRQVLGHUHGWKHPRVW
controlled type of squat that requires less
stabilisation of the lower limb joints 30
Statistical Analyses
The data were assessed for normality of
GLVWULEXWLRQXVLQJ44SORWVKLVWRJUDPVZLWK
superimposed normal curves, box plots and
.ROPRJRURY6PLUQRYWHVWVp31%DVHGRQWKH
data not meeting the assumptions of normality, the p
YDOXHZDVPRGLÀHGIURPSWRSDVD
correction factor to account for the infringements of
the normality assumption 317ZRZD\$129$V
were used to accommodate the two independent
variables type-of-squat and phase-of-squatXVLQJ,%0
63666WDWLVWLFVVRIWZDUH7KHHWDVTXDUHGƧ2DQG
SRZHUVWDWLVWLFVZHUHREWDLQHGDQG6FKHIIHSRVWKRF
WHVWVZHUHFRQGXFWHG
RESULTS
7KHPHDQ6'SHDN(0*506(0*DQG
L(0*IRUWKHWKUHHW\SHVRI VTXDWHFFHQWULFDQG
concentric phases, and 5 muscles are presented in
ÀJXUHV²7KH902DQG9/2VKRZHGWKH
KLJKHVW(0*DFWLYLW\LQDOOWKUHHW\SHVRI VTXDWLQ
Figure 1: Depiction of the bottom-of-the-squat criterion in the free (left), Smith (middle) and split (right) squats.
Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2016 | JOURNAL OF FITNESS RESEARCH 73
0
100
200
300 Free Squat
ECCEN TRI C
CONCE NTR IC
0
100
200
300
RMS EMG (%)
Smith Squa t
0
100
200
300
VMO VLO BF LG TA
Muscles
Split Squat
0
100
200
300
400 Free Squat
ECCENTRIC
CONCEN TRI C
0
100
200
300
400
iEMG (ȝV)
Smith Squa t
0
100
200
300
400
VMO VLO BF LG TA
Muscles
Split Squat
0
100
200
300 Free Squat
ECCENTRIC
CONCEN TRI C
0
100
200
300
RMS EMG (μV)
Smith Squa t
0
100
200
300
VMO VLO BF LG TA
Muscles
Split Squat
0
200
400
600
Free Squat
ECCENTRIC
CONCEN TRI C
0
200
400
600
Peak EMG ( ȝV)
Smith Squa t
0
200
400
600
VMO VLO BF LG TA
Muscles
Split Squat
Figure 5: Normalised RMS EMG for lower limb muscles in the
free, Smith and split squats. VMO = vastus medialis oblique,
VLO = vastus lateralis oblique, BF = biceps femoris, LG =
lateral gastrocnemius, and TA = tibialis anterior.
Figure 2: Mean ± SD peak EMG for lower limb muscles in the
free, Smith and split squats. VMO = vastus medialis oblique,
VLO = vastus lateralis oblique, BF = biceps femoris, LG =
lateral gastrocnemius, and TA = tibialis anterior.
Figure 3: Mean ± SD RMS EMG for lower limb muscles in the
free, Smith and split squats. VMO = vastus medialis oblique,
VLO = vastus lateralis oblique, BF = biceps femoris, LG =
lateral gastrocnemius, and TA = tibialis anterior.
Figure 4: Mean ± SD iEMG for lower limb muscles in the free,
Smith and split squats. VMO = vastus medialis oblique, VLO
= vastus lateralis oblique, BF = biceps femoris, LG = lateral
gastrocnemius, and TA = tibialis anterior.
Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2016 | JOURNAL OF FITNESS RESEARCH 74
Table 1: Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests of normality. Signicant values for EMG variables, muscles, types of squat, and phases of
the squat. VLO = vastus lateralis oblique, BF = biceps femoris, and TA = tibialis anterior.
Variable Muscle Type of Squat Kolmogorov-Smirnov
6LJQL¿FDQFH
Peak EMG BF Back 0.009
Smith 0.001
Mean EMG BF Smith 0.004
iEMG BF Split 0.001
iEMG TA Smith 0.001
Variable Muscle Type of Squat Kolmogorov-Smirnov
6LJQL¿FDQFH
RMS EMG BF ECC 0.001
CON 0.004
iEMG VLO ECC 0.001
BF ECC 0.005
CON 0.001
Table 2: Results of the two-way ANOVAs for peak EMG. VMO = vastus medialis oblique, VLO = vastus lateralis oblique, BF =
biceps femoris, LG = lateral gastrocnemius, and TA = tibialis anterior.
VMO VLO BF LG TA
Type of Squat p 0.143 0.028 0.003 0.001 0.001
F ratio 2.020 3.819 6.378 26.900 7.621
Ș20.700 0.124 0.191 0.499 0.220
Power 0.399 0.670 0.885 1.000 0.935
Squat Phases p 0.125 0.251 0.001 0.291 0.079
F ratio 2.430 1.344 20.800 1.136 3.206
Ș20.430 0.024 0.279 0.021 0.560
Power 0.750 0.207 0.994 0.182 0.420
Type of
Squat * Phases p 0.844 0.769 0.143 0.831 0.668
F ratio 0.170 0.264 2.016 0.186 0.407
Ș20.006 0.100 0.069 0.007 0.015
Power 0.750 0.900 0.398 0.077 0.112
Statistically significant values in bold (p ≤ 0.01)
Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2016 | JOURNAL OF FITNESS RESEARCH 75
Table 3: Results of the two-way ANOVAs for RMS EMG. VMO = vastus medialis oblique, VLO = vastus lateralis oblique, BF =
biceps femoris, LG = lateral gastrocnemius, and TA = tibialis anterior.
VMO VLO BF LG TA
Type of Squat p 0.772 0.566 0.002 0.001 0.193
F ratio 0.259 0.575 6.923 24.291 1.695
Ș20.010 0.021 0.204 0.474 0.059
Power 0.089 0.141 0.910 1.000 0.341
Squat Phases p 0.268 0.336 0.001 0.186 0.110
F ratio 1.254 0.943 11.402 1.793 2.634
Ș20.023 0.017 0.174 0.032 0.047
Power 0.196 0.159 0.912 0.260 0.357
Type of Squat * Phases p 0.765 0.957 0.658 0.897 0.881
F ratio 0.269 0.044 0.421 0.109 0.127
Ș20.010 0.002 0.015 0.040 0.005
Power 0.900 0.056 0.115 0.066 0.068
Statistically significant values in bold (p ≤ 0.01)
Table 4: Results of the two-way ANOVAs for iEMG. VMO = vastus medialis oblique, VLO = vastus lateralis oblique, BF = biceps
femoris, LG = lateral gastrocnemius, and TA = tibialis anterior.
VMO VLO BF LG TA
Type of Squat p 0.354 0.791 0.001 0.001 0.001
F ratio 1.057 0.236 18.338 0.482 24.871
Ș20.038 0.009 0.404 0.209 0.479
Power 0.226 0.085 1.000 1.000 1.000
Squat Phases p 0.782 0.489 0.061 0.624 0.190
F ratio 0.077 0.485 3.665 0.004 1.760
Ș20.001 0.009 0.064 0.243 0.032
Power 0.059 0.105 0.468 0.077 0.256
Type of
Squat * Phases p 0.820 0.978 0.320 0.970 0.499
F ratio 0.200 0.022 1.165 0.001 0.704
Ș20.007 0.001 0.041 0.600 0.025
Power 0.800 0.053 0.245 0.054 0.163
Statistically significant values in bold (p ≤ 0.01)
Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2016 | JOURNAL OF FITNESS RESEARCH 76
ERWKWKHHFFHQWULFDQGFRQFHQWULFSKDVHV7KHIUHH
VTXDWHOLFLWHGKLJKHUSHDN(0*IRUWKH902DQG
9/2WKDQWKH6PLWKDQGVSOLWVTXDWVLQWKHHFFHQWULF
SKDVHKRZHYHULQWKHFRQFHQWULFSKDVHWKH6PLWK
VTXDW\LHOGHGKLJKHUSHDN(0*7KH902DQG
9/2VKRZHGJHQHUDOO\JUHDWHU506(0*DFWLYLW\LQ
WKHIUHHVTXDWDQGKLJKHUL(0*DFWLYLW\LQWKHVSOLW
VTXDW
7KH%)DQG/*SRVWHULRUPXVFOHV\LHOGHGORZ
myo-electrical activity in the three types of squat;
however, the split squat involved higher activation of
WKH%)DQG/*7KHUHZDVDSSUR[LPDWHO\
KLJKHU(0*DFWLYDWLRQRI WKH%)LQWKHFRQFHQWULF
phase compared to the eccentric phase for all the
W\SHVRI VTXDW7KH7$ZDVPRGHUDWHO\DFWLYH
throughout all types of squat for both phases,
ZKHUHE\WKH(0*DFWLYLW\RI WKH7$ZDVKLJKHVWLQ
WKHVSOLWVTXDW
1RUPDOLVHG506(0*GDWDDUHSUHVHQWHGLQ
ÀJXUH7KH%)VKRZVHFFHQWULFSKDVHDQG
FRQFHQWULFDQGWKH/*VKRZVHFFHQWULF
SKDVHDQGFRQFHQWULF(0*DFWLYLW\LQWKH
VSOLWVTXDWFRPSDUHGWRWKH6PLWKVTXDW
7DEOHV²GLVSOD\WKHVWDWLVWLFDOÀQGLQJV7KH%)
PXVFOH6PLWKVTXDWW\SHDQGHFFHQWULFSKDVHDUHWKH
main sources of lack of normality of distribution in
WKH(0*GDWD7DEOH7KHGLIIHUHQFHVLQSHDN
(0*IRUWKH%)p /*p DQG7$
p ZHUHVWDWLVWLFDOO\VLJQLÀFDQWUHJDUGLQJ
type-of-squat2QO\WKHSHDN(0*IRUWKH%)p
VKRZHGVLJQLÀFDQWHIIHFWVIRUphase-of-squat
7DEOH)RUWKH506(0*WKH%)p DQG
/*p ZHUHVLJQLÀFDQWLQWHUPVRI type-of-
squatDQG%)p LQphase-of-squat7DEOH
)RUL(0*WKH%)/*DQG7$\LHOGHGDVLJQLÀFDQFH
level of p LQtype-of-squat7DEOH7DEOH
shows that the statistical differences were principally
EHWZHHQWKHIUHHVTXDWDQGWKHWZRRWKHUVTXDWW\SHV
DISCUSSION
7KH902DQG9/2ZHUHFRQVLGHUDEO\DFWLYHLQ
the three types of squat and both eccentric and
FRQFHQWULFSKDVHVÀJXUHV7KLVÀQGLQJLVZHOO
established across various studies that have reported
VLJQLÀFDQWO\KLJKHUTXDGULFHSVDFWLYDWLRQFRPSDUHG
to the hamstrings in squats 12,180RUHVSHFLÀFDOO\WKH
IUHHVTXDWVKRZVWKHKLJKHUSHDN(0*IRUWKH902
DQG9/2FRPSDUHGWRWKH6PLWKPDFKLQHDQGVSOLW
VTXDWÀJXUH7KH9/2\LHOGHGKLJKHU(0*
DFWLYLW\WKDQWKH902,QFRQWUDVW6FKZDQEHFNet al.
12UHSRUWHGWKDWWKHIUHHVTXDWHOLFLWHGJUHDWHU902
(0*DFWLYLW\FRPSDUHGWRWKH9/2LQWKH6PLWK
VTXDW+RZHYHU6FKZDQEHFNet al. 12 used a weight
WKDWWKHSDUWLFLSDQWVFRXOGOLIWWLPHVLH50WKH
difference in lifted weight between the studies may
explain the discrepancy in muscle activity pre-
GRPLQDQFH7KH%)DQG/*SRVWHULRUPXVFOHV
VKRZHGORZ(0*DFWLYLW\LQWKHWKUHHW\SHVRI
VTXDW+RZHYHUKLJKHUOHYHOVRI %)DFWLYDWLRQZHUH
recorded in the concentric phase compared to the
HFFHQWULFSKDVH,QDJUHHPHQW(VFDPLOODet al. 26
found that hamstring activity was greatest during the
DVFHQWFRQFHQWULFSKDVHRI WKHIUHHEDFNVTXDW
7KLVÀQGLQJLOOXVWUDWHVWKHFRQWULEXWLRQRI WKH
hamstrings to effective force production in the
FRQFHQWULFSKDVHRI WKHVTXDW,QWHUHVWLQJO\WKH
QRUPDOLVHG506(0*IRUWKH%)UHYHDOVKLJKHU
Table 5: Signicant post-hoc tests. BF = biceps femoris, LG =
lateral gastrocnemius, and TA = tibialis anterior.
Variable & muscle Types of squat p value
Peak BF Smith vs. Split 0.007
Back vs. Split 0.001
Peak LG Smith vs. Split 0.001
Back vs. Split 0.002
Peak TA Smith vs. Split 0.002
RMS BF Smith vs. Split 0.003
Back vs. Split 0.001
RMS LG Smith vs. Split 0.001
Back vs. Split 0.001
iEMG BF Smith vs. Split 0.001
Back vs. Split 0.001
iEMG LG Smith vs. Split 0.001
Back vs. Smith 0.001
iEMG TA Back vs. Split 0.010
Smith vs. Split 0.001
Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2016 | JOURNAL OF FITNESS RESEARCH 77
activity in the free and split squats compared to the
6PLWKVTXDWÀJXUH7KH7$ZDVPRGHUDWHO\DFWLYH
in all types of squat, whereby the split squat entailed
JUHDWHUUHFUXLWPHQWRI WKH7$7KH7$SOD\HGDQ
LPSRUWDQWUROHLQWKHHFFHQWULFSKDVH7KHL(0*ZDV
FRQVLGHUDEO\KLJKHUIRUWKH%)/*DQG7$LQWKH
VSOLWVTXDWFRPSDUHGWRWKH6PLWKVTXDWÀJXUH
7KLVÀQGLQJFDQEHH[SODLQHGE\WKHLQFUHDVHGWLPH
to complete the split squat and total amount of
muscle activity 25, as this type of squat is particularly
GHPDQGLQJLQWHUPVRI UHTXLUHGEDODQFHDQGFRQWURO
7KHHFFHQWULFIXQFWLRQRI WKH%)PXVFOHZDV
LGHQWLÀHGDVWKHPDLQFRQWULEXWRUWRQRQQRUPDOLW\
RI GLVWULEXWLRQRI WKH(0*GDWD7DEOH
6XUSULVLQJO\WKH6PLWKVTXDWGHVSLWHEHQHÀWWLQJ
from the added control provided by the steel rails,
DOVRFRQWULEXWHGWRQRQQRUPDOLW\RI WKHGDWD7KH
%)/*DQG7$VKRZHGVLJQLÀFDQWGLIIHUHQFHV
DFFRUGLQJWRVTXDWW\SHW\SLFDOVWDWLVWLFDOSRZHU
DERYH7DEOHVZKHUHWKHSRVWKRFDQDO\VLV
UHYHDOHGVLJQLÀFDQWO\KLJKHU(0*DFWLYLW\LQWKHVSOLW
VTXDW7DEOH7KH%)ZDVWKHRQO\PXVFOHLQ
ZKLFK(0*DFWLYDWLRQGLIIHUHGVLJQLÀFDQWO\EHWZHHQ
VTXDWSKDVHVZLWKVWDWLVWLFDOSRZHUDERYHIRU
SHDN(0*DQG506(0*7DEOHVDQG
6LPLODUO\6FKZDQEHFNet al. 12IRXQGWKDWWKH%)
SURGXFHGVLJQLÀFDQWO\KLJKHU506(0*DFWLYLW\p
LQWKHFRQFHQWULFSKDVHFRPSDUHGWRWKH
HFFHQWULFSKDVHLQERWKWKHIUHHDQG6PLWKVTXDWV
7KHÀQGLQJVVXJJ HVWWKDWWKHWKUHHW\SHVRI VTXDW
ORDGHGWKH9029/2DQG7$DQWHULRUPXVFOHV
PXFKPRUHWKDQWKH%)DQG/*SRVWHULRUPXVFOHV
Therefore, squats may be complemented with other
strength exercises that place focus on hamstring
strength; including stiff deadlifts, nordic curls, and
glute hamstring raises 277KHVHH[HUFLVHVZLOO
VLJQLÀFDQWO\LPSURYHHFFHQWULFKDPVWULQJVWUHQJWKLQ
DWKOHWHVZKLOVWUHGXFLQJORDGVRQWKH$&/8,14,277KH
ÀQGLQJVRI WKHSUHVHQWVWXG\KDYHLPSOLFDWLRQVIRU
VHOHFWLQJVTXDWW\SHIRUVWUHQJWKWUDLQLQJ$Q
approach of heavy eccentric training reduces power
output but allows for muscular hypertrophy while
gaining strength, therefore eccentric squat training
could be used in pre-season training 14'XULQJWKH
competitive season an eccentric plyometric based
approach would be most suitable as this develops
explosiveness and power 147KHVHSO\RPHWULF
exercises could incorporate split squats, lunges, squat
jumps, box jumps and single leg hopping particularly
EHQHÀFLDOIRUVSULQWHUV27)XUWKHUWKHIUHHDQG6PLWK
VTXDWVZHUHFRPSOHWHGLQDSSUR[LPDWHO\²V
whereas the split squat took about 12 s, indicating
that the two short-duration bilateral squats may be
used for the development of power of the
TXDGULFHSVLQVWUHQJWKWUDLQLQJ$VWKHVSOLWVTXDW
takes longer to perform, this exercise is appropriate
as a strength training exercise for both the quadriceps
and hamstrings, whilst developing stabilisation
capability of the lateral subsystem at the knee and
hip 21
The present study is limited to strength trained
males, thus further research may include a wider
SRSXODWLRQRI PDOHDQGIHPDOHDWKOHWHV'LVFUHWH
DQDO\VLVRI VSHFLÀFVSRUWVPD\SURYLGHJUHDWHU
LQVLJKWLQWR(0*DFWLYLW\DFFRUGLQJWRSUHGRPLQDQW
PXVFOHÀEUHW\SHVLQDWKOHWHV$OVRLQWKHVSOLWVTXDW
WKHSODFHPHQWRI WKHIURQWIRRWZDVQRWVSHFLÀHGIRU
the participants, however foot position may affect
WKHVSDWLRWHPSRUDOSDWWHUQRI (0*DFWLYDWLRQ,Q
particular, farther forward placement of the leading
foot recruits the gluteus maximus and hamstrings
more intensely 6)XWXUHVWXGLHVRI (0*PXVFOH
functionality in the squat could incorporate measures
of forces and knee angular kinematics using ground
reaction force platforms combined with automated
PRWLRQDQDO\VLVV\VWHPVUHVSHFWLYHO\7KHVTXDWV
could be performed at differed speeds of the
eccentric and concentric phases, using different loads
WRHYDOXDWHWKHHQVXLQJ(0*DFWLYLW\7KHSUHVHQW
(0*DQDO\VLVZDVFDUULHGRXWXVLQJWKHKLJKEDU
squat modality, in which the quadriceps and gluteus
act as the primary movers to compensate for the lack
of involvement of the hamstrings 177KHPRUH
vertical position of the torso associated with the
KLJKEDUWHFKQLTXHLVWKRXJKWWRUHGXFHWKH(0*
activity of the hamstrings and the spinal erectors 17,
which decreases the maximum weight that the athlete
can lift due to limited capability to utilize the
SRVWHULRUPXVFOHFKDLQ,WKDVEHHQSURSRVHG17 that a
more pronounced forward lean of the torso and hip
ÁH[LRQLQWKHORZEDUVTXDWPRGDOLW\FDXVHVWKH
hamstrings to be under tension at the bottom of the
Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2016 | JOURNAL OF FITNESS RESEARCH 78
VTXDW7KLVDOORZVWKHKDPVWULQJVWRFRQWULEXWH
prominently to hip extension during the ascent,
utilisation of the posterior chain musculature and
OLIWLQJKHDYLHUZHLJKW7KHUHIRUHIXWXUHUHVHDUFK
VKRXOGH[DPLQH(0*PXVFOHDFWLYLW\RI VTXDW
YDULDQWVXVLQJWKHORZEDUWHFKQLTXH)XUWKHU
kinesiological analysis may be more comprehensive
DQGPHDVXUHWKH(0*DFWLYLW\RI RWKHUPXVFOHV
including the gluteus maximus, adductors and
abductors 3,WLVDSSDUHQWWKDWXQLODWHUDOH[HUFLVHVDUH
important in strength training for improved
performance and injury prevention, especially for
sprinting 87KHUHIRUHXQLODWHUDOYDULDWLRQVRI WKH
VTXDWVKRXOGEHLQYHVWLJDWHGIXUWKHUXVLQJ(0*
CONCLUSION
,QWKLVVWXG\(0*DFWLYLW\RI WKHIUHH6PLWKDQG
VSOLWVTXDWVLQVWUHQJWKWUDLQHGPDOHVZDVDQDO\VHG
0XVFXODUDFWLYLW\ZDVKLJKHULQWKHFRQFHQWULFSKDVH
phase of the three types of squat compared to the
eccentric phase in all muscles examined with the
H[FHSWLRQRI WKH7$7KHVSOLWVTXDWHOLFLWHGKLJKHU
%)DQG/*PXVFOHDFWLYLW\FRPSDUHGWRWKHIUHHDQG
6PLWKVTXDWV8OWLPDWHO\WKHIUHHDQG6PLWKVTXDWV
DUHRI JUHDWYDOXHLQWKHGHYHORSPHQWRI 9029/2
DQG7$VWUHQJWK+RZHYHUWKHVSOLWVTXDWVKRXOGEH
incorporated into strength programs to develop the
%)DQG/*LQDWKOHWHVDQGPRUHHIIHFWLYHO\DFKLHYH
VWUHQJWKJDLQVLQWKHSRVWHULRUPXVFOHFKDLQ
REFERENCES
&ODUN'5/DPEHUW0,+XQWHU$0
0XVFOHDFWLYDWLRQLQWKHORDGHGIUHHEDUEHOOVTXDW
$EULHI UHYLHZJournal of Strength & Conditioning
Research.
&DQWUHOO*66FKLOOLQJ%.3DTXHWWH05
0XUODVLWV=0D[LPDOVWUHQJWKSRZHUDQG
aerobic endurance adaptations to concurrent
VWUHQJWKDQGVSULQWLQWHUYDOWUDLQLQJEuropean
Journal of Applied Physiology,
&DWHULVDQR$0RVV5(3HOOLQJHU7.
:RRGUXII./HZLV9&%RRWK:.KDGUD
77KHHIIHFWRI EDFNVTXDWGHSWKRQWKH
(0*DFWLYLW\RI VXSHUÀFLDOKLSDQGWKLJK
PXVFOHVJournal of Strength & Conditioning Research.
)U\$&6PLWK-&6FKLOOLQJ%.
(IIHFWRI NQHHSRVLWLRQRQKLSDQGNQHHWRUTXHV
GXULQJWKHEDUEHOOVTXDWJournal of Strength &
Conditioning Research.
-RQHV07$PEHJDRQNDU-31LQGO%&6PLWK
-$+HDGOH\6$(IIHFWVRI XQLODWHUDO
and bilateral lower-body heavy resistance exercise
on muscle activity and testosterone
UHVSRQVHVJournal of Strength & Conditioning
Research.
:LOVRQ-',UHODQG0/'DYLV,5
Core strength and lower extremity alignment
GXULQJVLQJOHOHJVTXDWVMedicine and Science in Sports
and Exercise.
&KHOO\06)DWKORXQ0&KHULI1$PDU0%
7DEND=YDQ3UDDJK((IIHFWVRI D
back squat training program on leg power, jump,
and sprint performances in junior soccer
SOD\HUVJournal of Strength & Conditioning Research.
+U\VRPDOOLV&7KHHIIHFWLYHQHVVRI
resisted movement training on sprinting and
MXPSLQJSHUIRUPDQFHJournal of Strength &
Conditioning Research.
6FKRHQIHOG%-6TXDWWLQJNLQHPDWLFVDQG
kinetics and their application to exercise
SHUIRUPDQFHJournal of Strength & Conditioning
Research.
0XUUD\1*&LSULDQL,'2·5DQG'5HHG
-RQHV5(IIHFWVRI IRRWSRVLWLRQGXULQJ
VTXDWWLQJRQWKHTXDGULFHSVIHPRULVDQ
HOHFWURP\RJUDSKLFVWXG\International Journal of
Exercise Science. 6
6FKLFN((&REXUQ-:%URZQ/(-XGHOVRQ
'$.KDPRXL$97UDQ778ULEH%3
$FRPSDULVRQRI PXVFOHDFWLYDWLRQ
EHWZHHQD6PLWKPDFKLQHDQGIUHHZHLJKWEHQFK
SUHVVJournal of Strength & Conditioning Research.
²
6FKZDQEHFN6&KLOLEHFN3'%LQVWHG*$
&RPSDULVRQRI IUHHZHLJKWVTXDWWR6PLWK
PDFKLQHVTXDWXVLQJHOHFWURP\RJUDSK\Journal of
Strength & Conditioning Research.
/DPRQW+6&UDPHU-7%HPEHQ'$6KHKDE
Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2016 | JOURNAL OF FITNESS RESEARCH 79
5/$QGHUVRQ0$%HPEHQ0*
(IIHFWVRI DGGLQJZKROHERG\YLEUDWLRQWRVTXDW
WUDLQLQJRQLVRPHWULFIRUFHWLPHFKDUDFWHULVWLFV
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research.
²
$UDQGMHORYLF2&RPPRQYDULDQWVRI WKH
UHVLVWDQFHPHFKDQLVPLQWKH6PLWKPDFKLQH
analysis of mechanical loading characteristics and
application to strength-oriented and hypertrophy-
RULHQWHGWUDLQLQJJournal of Strength & Conditioning
Research.
&RPIRUW3.DVLP32SWLPL]LQJVTXDW
WHFKQLTXHJournal of Strength & Conditioning Research.
3DROL$0DUFROLQ*3HWURQH17KH
effect of stance width on the electromyographical
DFWLYLW\RI HLJKWVXSHUÀFLDOWKLJKPXVFOHVGXULQJ
EDFNVTXDWZLWKGLIIHUHQWEDUORDGVJournal of
Strength & Conditioning Research.
:UHWHQEHUJ3)HQJ<$UERUHOLXV83
+LJKDQGORZEDUVTXDWWLQJWHFKQLTXHVGXULQJ
ZHLJKWWUDLQLQJMedicine and Science in Sport and
Exercise
$\RWWH16WHWWV'.HHQDQ**UHHQZD\(
(OHFWURP\RJUDSKLFDQDO\VLVRI VHOHFWHG
lower extremity muscles during 5 unilateral weight-
EHDULQJH[HUFLVHVJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports
Physical Therapy. ²
:LOODUGVRQ-0&RUHVWDELOLW\WUDLQLQJ
applications to sports conditioning
SURJUDPVJournal of Strength & Conditioning Research.
0FFXUG\.2·.HOOH\(.XW]0/DQJIRUG*
(UQHVW-7RUUHV0&RPSDULVRQRI
ORZHUH[WUHPLW\(0*EHWZHHQWKHOHJVTXDWDQG
PRGLÀHGVLQJOHOHJVTXDWLQIHPDOHDWKOHWHVJournal
of Sport Rehabilitation.
6DHWHUEDNNHQ$+)LPODQG06
0XVFOHDFWLYLW\RI WKHFRUHGXULQJELODWHUDO
unilateral, seated and standing resistance
H[HUFLVHEuropean Journal of Applied
Physioogy.
%R\OH0Advances in functional training
$SWRV&DOLIRUQLD2Q7DUJHW3XEOLFDWLRQV
GH)RUHVW%$&DQWUHOO*66FKLOOLQJ%.
0XVFOHDFWLYLW\LQVLQJOHYVGRXEOHOHJ
VTXDWVInternational Journal of Exercise Science. 7
/RQJSUH+6$FNHU600DO\05
0XVFOHDFWLYDWLRQDQGNQHHELRPHFKDQLFVGXULQJ
squatting and lunging after lower extremity fatigue
LQKHDOWK\\RXQJZRPHQJournal of Electromyography
and Kinesiology
%XUGHQ$6XUIDFH
HOHFWURP\RJUDSK\Biomechanical Evaluation of
Movement in Sport and Exercise3S
(VFDPLOOD5))OHVLJ*6=KHQJ1$/DQGHU
-(%DUUHQWLQH6:$QGUHZV-50RRUPDQ
&7(IIHFWVRI WHFKQLTXHYDULDWLRQVRQ
NQHHELRPHFKDQLFVGXULQJWKHVTXDWDQGOHJSUHVV
Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise.
%DHFKOH7(DUOH5Essentials of strength
training and conditioningrdHG&KDPSDLJQ,/
1DWLRQDO6WUHQJWKDQG&RQGLWLRQLQJ$VVRFLDWLRQ
$PHULFDQ&ROOHJHRI 6SRUWV0HGLFLQH
ACSM’s Health-Related Physical Fitness Assessment
Manual%DOWLPRUH/LSSLQFRWW:LOOLDPV:LONLQV
+HUPHQV+-)UHULNV%'LVVHOKRUVW.OXJ&
*QWHU5DX*'HYHORSPHQWRI
UHFRPPHQGDWLRQVIRU6(0*VHQVRUVDQGVHQVRU
SODFHPHQWSURFHGXUHVJournal of Electromyography
and Kinesiology²
0F%ULGH-0&RUPLH3'HDQH5
Isometric squat force output and muscle activity in
VWDEOHDQGXQVWDEOHFRQGLWLRQVJournal of Strength
& Conditioning Research.²
:HLQEHUJ6/$EUDPRZLW]6.
Statistics Using SPSS; an Integrative ApproachndHG
1HZ<RUN&DPEULGJH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV