Content uploaded by Dafna Lemish
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Dafna Lemish on Nov 06, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Published article:
Dill-Shackleford, K.E., Ramasubramanian, S., Behm-Morawitz, E., Scharrer, E.,
Burgess, M.C.R., & Lemish, D. (2017). Social group stories in the media and
child development. Pediatrics (Supplement 2), 140, S157-S161.
Short title: STORIES ABOUT SOCIAL GROUPS IN THE MEDIA
How Stories about Social Groups in Entertainment Media Factor into Development
Karen E. Dill-Shackleford, Ph.D.*
Fielding Graduate University
Srividya Ramasubramanian, Ph.D
Texas A & M University
Elizabeth Behm-Morawitz, Ph.D
University of Missouri
Erica Scharrer, Ph.D
University of Massachusetts-Amherst
Melinda C. R. Burgess, Ph.D
Southwest Oklahoma State University
Dafna Lemish, Ph.D
Southern Illinois University-Carbondale
Author note
Corresponding author: Karen Dill-Shackleford, 2020 De La Vina St., Santa Barbara, CA
93105, (805) 687-1099; kshack@fielding.edu
The working group on portrayals in the media of the Institute for Digital Media and Child
Development prepared this document. Karen E. Dill-Shackleford is the group chair. All
other working group members contributed equally to this project.
Financial Disclosure: The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to
disclose. Potential Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant
to this article to disclose.
Abbreviations: None.
1
Contributors’ Statement:
Dr. Dill-Shackleford organized and supervised the research team and wrote the initial
draft.
All other contributors edited the draft, adding to the writing and organization.
All contributors worked together to identify the key literature, and develop the paper’s
themes and the recommendations.
Word count: 1985
2
Abstract
How do children and youth come to understand what it means to be a member of a
particular race and gender? How do they come to hold beliefs about the groups that they
do and do not belong to? Both news stories and fictional narratives that we are tuned into
as a culture tell stories about what it means to be a member of a particular social group.
In this review article, we relate the latest scientific knowledge on information and
entertainment media representations of race, gender and other social categories and what
they tell us about how these messages are taken in and processed by developing minds.
We include research on identity development, social learning about members of other
groups, and both positive and negative behavioral outcomes to cultural messages about
race, gender and other social categories. We offer recommendations for stakeholders to
understand the role of the media in educating youth about race, gender and other social
categories.
3
Background
Even in school, and ostensibly while asleep, American children and adolescents
are increasingly connected to electronic devices and consuming entertainment media.1,2
Because we are social creatures and because social relationships are imperative for our
survival, we seek connections to other people both in the real world and the vicarious
world entertainment media offers us. These experiences, whether with real people or
fictitious characters, teach us about the social world and how to navigate it, including
how others feel about members of social groups—defined by race, gender, sexual identity
and their intersections—in terms of expectations, beliefs, and assumption.3
Quite simply, understanding the nature of the messages children and adolescents
receive from the media about both themselves and others as members of various social
groups (e.g., race, gender, sexual identity, and all the various intersectionalities of these
identities), and what effect these messages have on children’s and adolescents’ thoughts
and behaviors is a critical endeavor for anyone working with young people. We live in
an age where media are nearly unavoidable, and those who care about children and
adolescents are painfully aware of the importance of this world simply by being exposed
to some of the more serious effects of exposure such as eating disorders and the increased
violence that young Black males face in U.S. cities. As such, we review what research in
4
the social sciences and humanities (e.g,, cultural studies) can tell us about how media
messages about social representation are absorbed by developing minds, the nature of
those messages, what effect they have on developing people, and what recommendations
can be made regarding responsible media use and production.
Current State
How do developing minds absorb media messages? From Bandura’s early work
illustrating that children learn novel social interactions by watching adults in a short
film,4 to more recent work showing that simply imagining stereotypical behavior by an
individual can make stereotyped associations stronger,5 social science research has
repeatedly shown the power of media to teach. Perhaps the most counter-intuitive, but
one of the most critical, lines of work is cultivation theory which emphasizes that
children (and adults) need not even be consciously aware that they are absorbing the
messages of the digital world to have their attitudes and behaviors change in predictable
ways. 6,7
What is the nature of media messages about social representations? Much social
science research on the issue of social groups and their intersectionalities in the media has
taken the form of content analyses examining how social groups are portrayed. For an
overview regarding gender see Scharrer,8 and see Behm-Morawitz and Ortiz9 for an
overview of race. Generally, media messages about race and sexuality rely on either
stereotyped misrepresentations (e.g., the African-American ‘gangsta’ ubiquitous to video
games10), or a compelling absence notable by exceptions (e.g., television families are so
typically heteronormative that Grey’s Anatomy stood out for its portrayal of healthy gay
relationships). Media portrayals of gender are also fraught with stereotypes and troubling
5
messages. Primarily, regardless of genre or target audience demographic, men receive
the lion’s share of agentic roles while women are primarily valued for their sexuality and
appearance. In general, the shared culture that we access through audio-visual media
presents young, White, straight males as the hegemonic or dominant group. All others
(e.g., women, non-Whites, LGBTQ individuals) are frequently marginalized and
subordinated.
What effect do media messages about social representation have? Research
examining the effect of media representations can be categorized in two broad areas.
First, how do these messages influence behavioral choices and attitudes about the self?
Second, how do these messages influence behavioral choices and attitudes about others?
Much of these two areas focus on the poor behavioral choices that potentially limit an
individual’s options or have the potential to harm.
Impact on the self. Perhaps the most heavily researched area in this domain
comes from research examining media portrayals that emphasize beauty ideals,
sexualization and other demeaned status markers.11 The APA Task Force on the
sexualization of girls reported that objectification and sexualization of girls and women is
common in a variety of media genres and that exposure to this material by females is
related to a host of negative outcomes in the areas of cognitive and physical functioning,
body dissatisfaction and appearance anxiety, mental health (depression, self esteem) and
sexual well being.12 While many who work with adolescents are well aware of the range
of problems that can result from frequent media exposure to the “curvaceously thin” ideal
body type,13 it is important to understand that negative attitudes about bodies, and a desire
to take (unhealthy) behavioral steps to conform to these ideals are seen in children as
6
young as five years of age.14
Park, Diraddo, and Calogero15 describe how self-objectification leads to
appearance-based rejection sensitivity. Their model revealed that, for both males and
females, the socio-cultural factor of media exposure predicted the degree to which males
and females feared rejection based on their physical appearance. For children, the authors
note that if they are socialized to expect parents to treat them more favorably based on
their looks, they may fear rejection if they assess their looks as not meeting the standard
of cultural ideals portrayed in the media.
In terms of identity, a research study found that young Black video gamers were
more likely than young White gamers to identify with a same race avatar (White gamers
identified equally with same or other race avatars), and to see themselves as similar to
that avatar.16 Given that most Black avatars in video games are criminals, perhaps it is not
surprising that these young Black gamers experienced significantly lower levels of
positive affect following game play. Researchers are just beginning to examine the
impact of adopting these media personas on developing identities, but there is already
enough data to be concerned about how children of color’s views of themselves develop
in a world where their social group is either absent or presented through racist and
stereotyped portrayals.
Finally, from an academic perspective, research regarding both gender17 and race18
has shown that stereotyped media images can induce stereotype threat in college students.
Stereotype threat occurs when a member of a negatively stereotyped group
underperforms on some task, in part, because of the pressure of the negative stereotypes.
Stereotype threat is known to interfere not just with actual performance, but also with
7
career choice,17,19 disidentification with academics and impaired academic skill building,20
as well as negative health effects such as hypertension and anxiety.21 This kind of impact
has serious implications for individuals of a stereotyped group consciously or
unconsciously limiting their choices in terms of their future selves.
Impact on others. In regards to behavioral choices that are particularly harmful to
others, researchers have extensively examined how media messages influence our
responses to members of various social groups. Some of the most frightening work has
found that mere awareness of the existence of a stereotype linking African Americans
and violence predicts a less stringent criterion for deciding to shoot a Black male
character in a video game, but not a White male character.22 Similar work in regards to
harmful choices and gender has found that media exposure is linked to increased
acceptance of rape myths 23 and decreased interest in seeking sexual consent and
decreased intentions to honor non-consent.24
A number of studies have demonstrated that the way gender, race and other social
groups are portrayed in the media can influence attitudes (such as Pro-Black attitudes),
feelings (e.g., using a feelings thermometer to measure prejudice), thoughts (e.g., implicit
cognition tasks) and behavioral outcomes (e.g., behavioral measures of voting
preference) (see, for example, Dill & Burgess;25 Ramasubramanian & Oliver26) including
attitudes towards policy and political judgments.25,27 Such studies have uncovered trends
for long-term effects and for the importance of recency, vividness, and frequency of
exposure in influencing thinking about race (see, for example Mastro, Behm-Morawitz &
Ortiz28).
Positive Impacts. Recent work calls for the presentation of counter-stereotypes or
8
progressive racial and gender imagery to positively influence stereotypical beliefs.29-31 For
example, Lemish11 offered a model of eight specific principles for accomplishing such
social goals in children’s media. Ramasubramanian27 exposed Whites to either
stereotypes or counter-stereotypes of Black and found that exposure to stereotypes,
relative to counter-stereotypes, influenced beliefs about African Americans and
affirmative action policies. Furthermore, what mediated the relationship was the belief
that Blacks were responsible for their own failures. A study demonstrated that exposure to
negative exemplars of Black men (thugs) versus progressive exemplars (progressive
images) resulted in completely different judgments and behavioral intentions towards
others.25 Specifically, when judging White or Black political candidates, the White
candidate garnered greater admiration and endorsement after participants saw the thug
prime, whereas the Black candidate garnered greater admiration and endorsement (both
compared to a White candidate with the same credentials) after participants saw the
progressive primes. The latest research30-32 indicates that the combination of a message-
centered approach (such as exposure to counter-stereotypical positive exemplars) with an
audience-centered approach (such as media literacy education) can lead to effective
prejudice reduction.
Future Research
Some trends in research in media portrayals of social groups include: 1)
recognizing the importance of intersectionalities of social groups, so that multiple aspects
of identity (like gender and race) are considered side by side; 2) recognizing the
importance of social media as well as new and developing media; 3) focusing on counter-
stereotypes as tools to supply more data about positive aspects of media representations;
9
and 4) extending these tools to apply to relational dynamics as well as outcomes studied
more frequently. Future research should address these issues.
Recommendations
In this paper we have only be able to touch upon two key demographics – gender
and race, although there is additional scholarships about other important human
categories such as ethnic groups, people with disabilities, sexual identity, the elderly,
religious groups, etc. Given that a body of expert research knowledge has catalogued
negative effects of negative representations and positive effects of healthy representations
of social groups, our first recommendation for parents, the media industry, policymakers,
educators, pediatricians, and all other stakeholders is to take seriously that cultural stories
make a difference in the lives of children as well as adults. Avoid thinking that the
ubiquity of media or their entertainment value means that they are trivial or insignificant.
Stories and public discussions have always been key components of our understanding of
ourselves and others. Researchers need to continue bridging efforts with the media
industry and policymakers, to work hand in hand with pediatricians, to invest in media
literacy initiatives and curricula, to collaborate with NGOs working for social justice,
provide inputs on policy guidelines, and to be publicly engaged in sharing scholarship
with diverse audiences in accessible ways. Parents and educators need to talk to children
and teens about how the stories they see tell them who they are and help them to
understand where the stories came from and what their own role is in determining their
destiny. Understand that the content and the frequency of exposure matters in children’s
development. Find counter-stereotypes and make sure children are exposed to these.
Open a dialogue with them about their perspectives. Finally, listen and learn from your
10
children’s perspectives.
References
1. Christakis DA, Moreno MA. Trapped in the Net: Will Internet Addiction Become
a 21st-Century Epidemic?Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.
2009;163:959-960.
2. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8-
to 18-Year-Olds. 2010. Available at: http://kff.org/other/event/generation-m2-
media-in-the-lives-of/.
3. Dill-Shackleford KE. How Fantasy Becomes Reality: Information and
Entertainment Media in Everyday Life. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University
Press; 2016.
4. Bandura A, Ross D, Ross S a. Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. J
Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1963;66(1):3-11. doi:10.1037/h0048687.
5. Slusher MP, Anderson C a. When reality monitoring fails: The role of
imagination in stereotype maintenance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52(4):653-662.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.653.
6. Gerbner, G. (1999). The stories we tell. Peace Review, 11(1), 9–15.
doi:10.1080/10402659908426225
7. Busselle R, Bilandzic H. Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing
stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Commun Theory.
2008;18(2):255-280. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x.
8. Scharrer EL. Representations of gender in the media. Oxford Handb media
Psychol. 2013;(April):267-284. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398809.013.0015.
9. Behm-Morawitz E, Ortiz M. Race, ethnicity, and the media. Oxford Handb media
Psychol. 2013;(April):252-264. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398809.013.0014.
10. Burgess MCR, Dill KE, Stermer SP, Burgess SR, Brown BP. Playing with
prejudice: The prevalence and consequences of racial stereotypes in video games.
Media Psychol. 2011;14(3):289-311. doi:10.1080/15213269.2011.596467.
11. Lemish D. Screening Gender on Children's Television: The Views of Producers
Around the World. 1st ed. New York;London;: Routledge; 2010.
11
12. Zurbriggen EL, Collins RL, Lamb S, et al. APA Task Force on the Sexualization
of Girls. Washington, D.C.; 2007.
13. Harrison K. Television viewers’ ideal body proportions: The case of the
curvaceously thin woman. Sex Roles. 2003;48(5-6):255-264.
doi:10.1023/A:1022825421647.
14. Dohnt H, Tiggemann M. The contribution of peer and media influences to the
development of body satisfaction and self-esteem in young girls: a prospective
study. Dev Psychol. 2006;42(5):929-936. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.929.
15. Park LE, Diraddo AM, Calogero RM. Sociocultural influence and appearance-
based rejection sensitivity among college students. Psychol Women Q.
2009;33(1):108–119. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01478.x.
16. Cicchirillo V, Appiah O. The impact of racial representations in video game
contexts: Identification with Gaming Characters. New Media Mass Commun.
2014;26:14-21. doi:10.7176/NMMC.vol2614-21.
17. Davies PG, Spencer SJ, Quinn DM, Gerhardstein R. Consuming Images: How
Television Commercials that Elicit Stereotype Threat Can Restrain Women
Academically and Professionally. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2002;28(12):1615-
1628. doi:10.1177/014616702237644.
18. Deskins T, Burgess M. Video games elicit academic stereotype threat in Black
college students. 2015.
19. Davies PG, Spencer SJ, Steele CM. Clearing the air: identity safety moderates the
effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. J Pers Soc
Psychol. 2005;88(2):276-287. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276.
20. Appel M, Kronberger N. Stereotypes and the Achievement Gap : Stereotype
Threat Prior to Test Taking. 2012:609-635. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9200-4.
21. Aronson J, Burgess D, Phelan SM, Juarez L. Unhealthy interactions: The role of
stereotype threat in health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(1):50-56.
doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300828.
22. Correll J, Park B, Judd CM, Wittenbrink B. The police officer’s dilemma: using
ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. J Pers Soc Psychol.
2002;83(6):1314-1329. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314.
23. Beck VS, Boys S, Rose C, Beck E. Violence Against Women in Video Games: A
Prequel or Sequel to Rape Myth Acceptance? J Interpers Violence. 2012;27:3016-
3031. doi:10.1177/0886260512441078.
12
24. Hust SJT, Marett EG, Ren C, et al. Establishing and adhering to sexual consent:
The association between reading magazines and college students’ sexual consent
negotiation. J Sex Res. 2014;51(3):280-290. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.727914.
25. Dill KE, Burgess MCR. Influence of Black Masculinity Game Exemplars on
Social Judgments. Simul Gaming. 2012;44(4):562-585.
doi:10.1177/1046878112449958
26. Ramasubramanian S, Oliver MB. Activating and Suppressing Hostile and
Benevolent Racism: Evidence for Comparative Media Stereotyping. Media
Psychol. 2007;9(3):623-646. doi:10.1080/15213260701283244.
27. Ramasubramanian S. The Impact of Stereotypical Versus Counterstereotypical
Media Exemplars on Racial Attitudes, Causal Attributions, and Support for
Affirmative Action. Communic Res. 2011;38(4):497-516.
doi:10.1177/0093650210384854.
28. Mastro D, Behm-Morawitz E, Ortiz M. The Cultivation of Social Perceptions of
Latinos: A Mental Models Approach. Media Psychol. 2007;9(2):347-365.
doi:10.1080/15213260701286106.
29. Holt LF. Writing the Wrong: Can Counter-Stereotypes Offset Negative Media
Messages about African Americans? Journal Mass Commun Q. 2013;90(1):108-
125. doi:10.1177/1077699012468699.
30. Ramasubramanian S. Media-Based Strategies To Reduce Racial Stereotypes
Activated By News Stories. Journal Mass Commun Q. 2007;84(2):249-264.
doi:10.1177/107769900708400204.
31. Scharrer E, Ramasubramanian S. Intervening in the Media’s Influence on
Stereotypes of Race and Ethnicity: The Role of Media Literacy Education. J Soc
Issues. 2015;71(1):171–185. doi:10.1111/josi.12103.
32. Ramasubramanian S. Using celebrity news stories to effectively reduce
racial/Ethnic prejudice. J Soc Issues. 2015;71(1):123-138. doi:10.1111/josi.12100.
13