Content uploaded by Christoph D D Rupprecht
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Christoph D D Rupprecht on Oct 30, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Territories of Encounter:
Informal Urban Green Space in Shrinking Japanese Cities
— a Birthplace for Convivial Imaginaries?
East Asian Anthropological Association Annual Meeting!
October 2017, Hong Kong
Christoph Rupprecht
FEAST Project
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature
Tokyo Genso art of overgrown Tokyo and Tokyo Jungle game
artwork removed for copyright reasons, find it here:
https://tokyogenso.deviantart.com/gallery/
http://tokyojungle.wikia.com/wiki/File:Tokyoj2.jpg
Depopulation in Japan and wider Asia is usually seen as a
source of problems and conflict, including in artists
imaginations of what the future might look like (see below).
Informal urban green spaces
Street verge Gap
Railway Brownfield Waterside
Lots
Structural Microsite Powerline
IGS in Sapporo (Japan) & Brisbane (Australia)
Lot
42%
Gap
19%
Street
verge
16%
Brownfield
10%
Waterside
10%
Lot
8%
Street verge
80%
Brownfield
5%
Railway
5%
Better Both Worse Neutral
Sapporo
Brisbane
Does IGS make daily life
better or worse? (appreciation)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
% of respondents
Recreational IGS use
Now, as adults In my childhood
Sapporo
Brisbane
•~5% of city area
•14% of total urban green space
2012 mail-back survey, n=163/121 (Sapporo/Brisbane)
What animals would you like to have in your
neighborhood? Sapporo
Rats
Snakes
Deer
Feral dogs
Raccoons
Brown bears
Monkeys
Squirrels
Sparrows
Small birds
Wild birds
Rabbits
Butterflies
Cuckoos
Ducks
Hokkaido squirrels
Horses
Owls
Bears Crows
Foxes
Birds
Cats
Feral cats
Pigeons
Dogs
Ezo red foxes
Tanukis
Insects
Wolves
5
10
20
40
80
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 010 20 30 40 50
Number of times mentioned by respondents
Respondents' preference score for animals
Unwanted
Want e d
Contested
Linear (Unwanted)
Linear (Wanted)
Where do you think animals should be able to live?
42%
87%
72%
89%
67%
97%
4%
29%
14%
38%
23%
89%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
City centre City parks Private
gardens
Informal
urban
greenspace
Agricultural
areas
Forests or
bushland
Percent of respondents
Brisbane
Sapporo
IGS as territories of encounter?
•Neither formally recognized nor managed by
governing institutions or owner
•“Urban wild-scapes, loose spaces, unclaimed
territories” = freedom from purpose
•Rules of human-nonhuman encounter are not
pre-negotiated: reconfiguration possible
•‘Provisional arrangement’ leaves room,
‘disciplining neither people in their actions
nor nature in its development’. (Nohl 1990)
“We live in a very organised
world – it’s good when nature
takes over and reminds us that
we only have temporary use of
the space. In the urban
environment, man usually wins
the battle against nature, so it is
nice to see nature fighting
back where it can.”
– Female, 62, Brisbane
“A neutral zone that belongs to nobody is
necessary: left-over room, margins,
interstices, space. A life like in the city,
where man-made objects are
surrounded by nothing but artificial
greenspace, is suffocating.”
–Male, 45, Sapporo
“Unlike maintained greenspace, it has
something you can grasp with all five
senses, and I don’t want it to disappear.”
–Female, 35, Sapporo
What’s happening here?
•Castoriadis (1997)!
Imaginary: capacity to see in a thing what it is not!
Social imaginary: what a society has imagined
•“The aesthetic joy the observer experiences when looking
[at IGS] can be explained by the fact that he has discovered !
an actually possible image of a !
more conciliatory world” !
(Nohl 1990)
•We are witnessing the imaginary !
being decolonized… by whom?!
(Latouche 2014)
Decolonizers of the imaginary
social!
imaginary
Non-humans
More-than-human !
geographies & planning
River as entity !
with human rights
Convivial cities
multi-species perspectives
Past
generations
Spiritual beings
& concepts
Future
generations
Future design
Future generations ombudsmen
Haudenosaunee ‘unborn of the future Nation’
Intergenerational justice Youth suffrage
Traditional ecological !
knowledge & practices
Maori kaitiaki (guardians) & !
kaitiakitanga (practice)
Narratives of natural disasters
Shinto kami: place-based deities
w/ agency & interests
Abrahamic religions’ depictions of!
heaven/paradise as garden
Loma ‘ancestral habitus’
11 / 12
Science fiction
Buddhist interdependence of life,!
awareness of suffering, empathy
Animal rights
Narratives of control, !
nativeness and belonging
•“…non-native, feral, alien, wild, no affection for
their owners, do not belong, should live
somewhere else (away from me)”
•Concepts of control, nativeness and belonging
transcend human-nonhuman boundaries
•Ecological nativeness linked to xenophobia !
(Gröning & Wolschke-Bulmahn 2003, Warren 2007)
Shrinking cities as birthplaces of convivial imaginaries? !
From IGS to multi-cultural gardens
• Representative survey in 4 largest
Japanese shrinking cities: residents
preferred green space and community
gardens over bigger houses and
apartments.
• “Actually possible images of a more
conciliatory world”: places of
decolonization of the imaginary?
• Examples: !
Muse garden: Intercultural garden of
Tsukuba University (Japan)!
New Indigenous Community Garden
Armidale (Australia)
References
Castoriadis, C., 1997. The imaginary institution of society. Mit Press.
Gröning, G., Wolschke-Bulmahn, J., 2003. The Native Plant Enthusiasm: ecological panacea or xenophobia?
Landscape Research 28, 75. doi:10.1080/01426390306536
Latouche, S. 2014. Imaginary, decolonization of. In: D’Alisa, G., Demaria, F., Kallis, G., Degrowth: A Vocabulary for
a New Era. Routledge.
Muse Garden: Intercultural garden in University of Tsukuba: https://www.facebook.com/MusegardenTsukuba/
New Indigenous Community Garden - Armidale: https://www.facebook.com/armidalecommunitygarden/
Nohl, W., 1990. Gedankenskizze einer Naturästhetik der Stadt. Landschaft und Stadt 22, 57–67.!
Rupprecht, C.D.D., Byrne, J.A., 2014. Informal urban green-space: comparison of quantity and characteristics in
Brisbane, Australia and Sapporo, Japan. PloS ONE 9, e99784. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099784
Rupprecht, C.D.D., Byrne, J.A., Ueda, H., Lo, A.Y.H., 2015. ‘It’s real, not fake like a park’: Residents’ perception
and use of informal urban green-space in Brisbane, Australia and Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning
143, 205–218. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.003
Rupprecht, C. D. D. (forthcoming) Ready for more-than-human? Urban residents’ willingness to coexist with animals
and plants? Preprint available at: http://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/hbcmz/
Warren, C.R., 2007. Perspectives on the `alien’ versus `native’ species debate: a critique of concepts, language and
practice. Progress in Human Geography 31, 427–446. doi:10.1177/0309132507079499