A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Landscape Ecology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Landscape capability models as a tool to predict fine-scale
forest bird occupancy and abundance
Zachary G. Loman .William V. Deluca .Daniel J. Harrison .
Cynthia S. Loftin .Brian W. Rolek .Petra B. Wood
Received: 25 April 2017 / Accepted: 6 October 2017 / Published online: 16 October 2017
Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017
Abstract
Context Species-specific models of landscape capa-
bility (LC) can inform landscape conservation design.
Landscape capability is ‘‘the ability of the landscape to
provide the environment […] and the local resources
[…] needed for survival and reproduction […]in
sufficient quantity, quality and accessibility to meet
the life history requirements of individuals and local
populations.’’ Landscape capability incorporates spe-
cies’ life histories, ecologies, and distributions to
model habitat for current and future landscapes and
climates as a proactive strategy for conservation
planning.
Objectives We tested the ability of a set of LC
models to explain variation in point occupancy and
abundance for seven bird species representative of
spruce-fir, mixed conifer-hardwood, and riparian and
wooded wetland macrohabitats.
Methods We compiled point count data sets used for
biological inventory, species monitoring, and field
studies across the northeastern United States to create
an independent validation data set. Our validation
explicitly accounted for underestimation in validation
data using joint distance and time removal sampling.
Results Blackpoll warbler (Setophaga striata), wood
thrush (Hylocichla mustelina), and Louisiana (Parke-
sia motacilla) and northern waterthrush (P. novebo-
racensis) models were validated as predicting
variation in abundance, although this varied from not
biologically meaningful (1%) to strongly meaningful
Electronic supplementary material The online version of
this article (doi:10.1007/s10980-017-0582-z) contains supple-
mentary material, which is available to authorized users.
Z. G. Loman (&)D. J. Harrison B. W. Rolek
Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Conservation
Biology, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Room
210, Orono, ME 04469, USA
e-mail: zachary.loman@maine.edu
W. V. Deluca
Department of Environmental Conservation, University of
Massachusetts, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst,
MA 01003, USA
C. S. Loftin
Maine Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, U.S.
Geological Survey, 5755 Nutting Hall, Room 210, Orono,
ME 04469, USA
P. B. Wood
U.S. Geological Survey, West Virginia Cooperative Fish
and Wildlife Research Unit, West Virginia University,
P. O. Box 6125, 322 Percival Hall, Morgantown,
WV 26506, USA
123
Landscape Ecol (2018) 33:77–91
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0582-z
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.