In order to build models that relate thematic mapper (TM) imagery
to field forest variables, several regression techniques, such as the
ones based on the Mallows' Cp and the adjusted R2
statistics, were applied. Nevertheless, although the best created models
had good fittings (R2>0.65) apparently supported by a
clear statistical significance (p<0.0001), later trials tested with
additional plots showed that these models were, in fact, nonrobust
models (models with very low-predictive capabilities). Two factors were
pointed out as causes of these inconsistencies between predicted and
observed values: a relatively small number of available field plots and
a relatively high number of possible independent variables. Actually,
different trials suggested much lower fittings for the expected
“really” predictive models. Some restrictions of TM
satellite data, such as its radiometric, spectral, and spatial
limitations, together with restrictions arising from gathering and
processing of field data, might have led to these poor relations. This
study shows the need for guarantees stronger than the usual ones before
concluding that there is a clear possibility of using satellite
information to estimate forest parameters by means of regression
techniques