No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Evaluation of the selectivity and sensitivity of isoform-And mutation-specific RAS antibodies
Abstract
There is intense interest in developing therapeutic strategies for RAS proteins, the most frequently mutated oncoprotein family in cancer. Development of effective anti-RAS therapies will be aided by the greater appreciation of RAS isoform–specific differences in signaling events that support neoplastic cell growth. However, critical issues that require resolution to facilitate the success of these efforts remain. In particular, the use of well-validated anti-RAS antibodies is essential for accurate interpretation of experimental data. We evaluated 22 commercially available anti-RAS antibodies with a set of distinct reagents and cell lines for their specificity and selectivity in recognizing the intended RAS isoforms and mutants. Reliability varied substantially. For example, we found that some pan- or isoform-selective anti-RAS antibodies did not adequately recognize their intended target or showed greater selectivity for another; some were valid for detecting G12D and G12V mutant RAS proteins in Western blotting, but none were valid for immunofluorescence or immunohistochemical analyses; and some antibodies recognized nonspecific bands in lysates from “Rasless” cells expressing the oncoprotein BRAFV600E. Using our validated antibodies, we identified RAS isoform–specific siRNAs and shRNAs. Our results may help to ensure the accurate interpretation of future RAS studies.
... Unfortunately, many commercialized KRAS antibodies are of bad quality [10] because of inappropriate design and/or incomplete validation [11]. Recently, Water and coworkers found that among twenty-two commercialized RAS antibodies, only eight were able to detect RAS isoforms by Western blot but none of them were functional in immunolabeling [12]. In addition, these antibodies mainly recognize the endogenous prenylated form, and not the unprenylated form, of KRAS, which significantly limits the panel of research applications. ...
... The lack of KRAS antibodies working in a large panel of applications is surprising because of its importance in the carcinogenesis process of many cancers; the reasons behind this lack are multiple. There is certainly an insufficient characterization of the commercialized RAS antibodies [12], which reflects a current global problem [18][19][20]. Another reason comes from the fact that KRAS shares high homology with HRAS and NRAS, which renders the generation of a specific KRAS antibody extremely challenging. ...
... RAS proteins exhibit 82 to 90% sequence similarity, except at the C-terminal tail that is the most divergent region [5,12]. In our study, peptide-2 from the C-terminal region of KRAS4B was weakly immunogenic in rabbits. ...
KRAS is a powerful oncogene responsible for the development of many cancers. Despite the great progress in understanding its function during the last decade, the study of KRAS expression, subcellular localization, and post-translational modifications remains technically challenging. Accordingly, many facets of KRAS biology are still unknown. Antibodies could be an effective and easy-to-use tool for in vitro and in vivo research on KRAS. Here, we generated a novel rabbit polyclonal antibody that allows immunolabeling of cells and tissues overexpressing KRAS. Cell transfection experiments with expression vectors for the members of the RAS family revealed a preferential specificity of this antibody for KRAS. In addition, KRAS was sensitively detected in a mouse tissue electroporated with an expression vector. Interestingly, our antibody was able to detect endogenous forms of unprenylated (immature) and prenylated (mature) KRAS in mouse organs. We found that KRAS prenylation was increased ex vivo and in vivo in a model of KRAS G12D-driven tumorigenesis, which was concomitant with an induction of expression of essential KRAS prenylation enzymes. Therefore, our tool helped us to put the light on new regulations of KRAS activation during cancer initiation. The use of this tool by the RAS community could contribute to discovering novel aspects of KRAS biology.
... The high degree of amino acid sequence similarity between the four RAS proteins, i.e., K-RAS4A, K-RAS4B, H-RAS, and N-RAS ( Figure 1A), and the subsequent difficulty in generating selective antibodies against individual isoforms pose substantial challenges in studying specific RAS proteins (Waters et al., 2017). To explore targeted proteolysis of K-RAS using the AdPROM system, we used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to generate an A549 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cell line harboring a homozygous knockin of green fluorescent protein (GFP) cDNA at the N terminus of the native K-RAS gene ( Figure S1). ...
... A number of RAS antibodies have been evaluated for selective recognition of the different RAS proteins by western blotting (Waters et al., 2017), but none of these have been selective for use in immunofluorescence studies. Consequently, studies evaluating subcellular distribution of RAS proteins have been restricted to overexpression systems. ...
... Overexpression of GFP-tagged or other epitope-tagged K-RAS has been used frequently to investigate RAS localization (Schmick et al., 2014;Spencer-Smith et al., 2017;Tsai et al., 2015). This overcomes the difficulty in the study of RAS proteins in the absence of robust reagents to reliably detect specific RAS proteins at the endogenous levels, especially by immunofluorescence (Waters et al., 2017). Our homozygous A549 GFPKRAS NSCLC cell line, generated using CRISPR/Cas9, has allowed us not only to assess localization of endogenously driven GFP-K-RAS protein, but its mobility shift has allowed us to test the utility of panRAS and K-RAS antibodies in detecting K-RAS by western blotting. ...
K-RAS is known as the most frequently mutated oncogene. However, the development of conventional K-RAS inhibitors has been extremely challenging, with a mutation-specific inhibitor reaching clinical trials only recently. Targeted proteolysis has emerged as a new modality in drug discovery to tackle undruggable targets. Our laboratory has developed a system for targeted proteolysis using peptidic high-affinity binders, called “AdPROM.” Here, we used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to knock in a GFP tag on the native K-RAS gene in A549 adenocarcinoma (A549GFPKRAS) cells and constructed AdPROMs containing high-affinity GFP or H/K-RAS binders. Expression of GFP-targeting AdPROM in A549GFPKRAS led to robust proteasomal degradation of endogenous GFP-K-RAS, while expression of anti-HRAS-targeting AdPROM in different cell lines resulted in the degradation of both GFP-tagged and untagged K-RAS, and untagged H-RAS. Our findings imply that endogenous RAS proteins can be targeted for proteolysis, supporting the idea of an alternative therapeutic approach to these undruggable targets.
... The high degree of amino acid sequence similarity between the four RAS proteins, i.e. 287 K-RAS4A, K-RAS4B, H-RAS and N-RAS (Fig. 1A), and the subsequent difficulty in 288 generating selective antibodies against individual isoforms pose substantial 289 challenges in studying specific RAS proteins [32]. In order to explore targeted 290 proteolysis of K-RAS using the AdPROM system, we employed CRISPR/Cas9 291 technology to generate an A549 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cell line 292 harbouring a homozygous knock-in of green fluorescent protein (GFP) cDNA at the N-293 terminus of the native K-RAS gene (Fig. S1). ...
... Recently, a number of RAS antibodies have been evaluated for selective recognition 312 of the different RAS proteins by Western blotting [32], but none of these have been 313 selective for use in immunofluorescence studies. Consequently, studies evaluating 314 subcellular distribution of RAS proteins have been restricted to overexpression 315 systems. ...
... One difficulty in the study of RAS proteins is the absence of robust reagents to reliably 488 detect specific RAS proteins at the endogenous levels, especially by 489 immunofluorescence [32]. Often, overexpression of GFP-tagged or other epitope-490 tagged K-RAS has been employed to investigate RAS localization [36,49,50]. ...
For over three decades, K-RAS has been known as the holy grail of cancer targets, one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in cancer. Because the development of conventional small molecule K-RAS inhibitors has been extremely challenging, K-RAS has been dubbed as an undruggable target, and only recently a mutation specific inhibitor has reached clinical trials. Targeted protein degradation has emerged as a new modality in drug discovery to tackle undruggable targets. However, no degrader for K-RAS has been described thus far. Our laboratory has developed an Affinity-directed PROtein Missile (AdPROM) system for targeted proteolysis of endogenous proteins through the ubiquitin proteasome system. Here, we show that we can achieve degradation of endogenous K-RAS and H-RAS in different cell lines in a targeted manner using our AdPROM system. Our findings imply that endogenous RAS proteins can be targeted for proteolysis, thereby offering tantalising possibilities for an alternative therapeutic approach to these so-called undruggable targets in cancer.
... Based on data presented in Waters et al we used two validated siRNA tools to knock down the expression of K-RAS or N-RAS in pancreatic and colon cancer cells. 27 In our assays, knock down of wild type N-RAS reduced wild type N-RAS staining bỹ 80%, but did not alter staining for mutant K-RAS or for ERK2. Knock down of mutant K-RAS reduced mutant K-RAS staining, also by~80%, but did not alter staining for wild type N-RAS or ERK2 (Figure 4(b)). ...
... This addresses the major concerns of Waters et al who demonstrated that the majority of commercially available anti-K-RAS and anti-N-RAS antibodies are non-specific. 27 Very recently, after publication of our initial studies concerning the interactions of neratinib, ERBB1 and RAS, Moll et al. and Kruspig et al. both presented confirmatory evidence, for example Moll et al. showing that the irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor afatinib both inhibited the expression and phosphorylation of ERBB2 in NSCLC cells expressing a mutant K-RAS. [19][20][21]45,46 In agreement with our prior published data, Kruspig et al demonstrated that neratinib reduced the protein levels of ERBB1, ERBB2 and ERBB3 in NSCLC cells in vitro and in vivo, although neratinib concentrations four-fold greater than those safely achievable in a human patient were used. ...
... Based on data from Waters et al, we used two validated siRNA tools to knock down K-RAS or N-RAS; custom made NRAS-5 CCUGAGUACUGACCUAAGAdTdT and K-RAS Silencer s7940. 27 Other reagents and the performance of experimental procedures were all as described in references 20-24. Commercially available validated short hairpin RNA molecules to knock down RNA/protein levels were from Qiagen (Valencia, CA).The percentage knock down or over-expression of the specified proteins in P2 cells, 24h after transfection was: BAX, 82%; BAK, 80%; siBCL-XL, 79%; siMCL-1, 79%; CD95, 79%; AIF, 80%; FADD, 21%; RIP-1, 78%; RIP-3, 79%; ATM, 77%; AMPKα, 77%; ULK-1, 75%; ATG5, 76%; Beclin1, 75%; eIF2α, 77%; dom. ...
There is no efficacious standard of care therapy for uveal melanoma. Unlike cutaneous disease, uveal melanoma does not exhibit RAS mutations but instead contains mutations with ~90% penetrance in either Gαq or Gα11. Previously we demonstrated that neratinib caused ERBB1/2/4 and RAS internalization into autolysosomes which resulted in their proteolytic degradation. In PDX isolates of uveal melanoma, neratinib caused the internalization and degradation of Gαq and Gα11 in parallel with ERBB1 breakdown. These effects were enhanced by the HDAC inhibitor entinostat. Similar data were obtained using GFP/RFP tagged forms of K-RAS V12. Down regulation of Gαq and Gα11 expression and RAS-GFP/RFP fluorescence required Beclin1 and ATG5. The [neratinib + entinostat] combination engaged multiple pathways to mediate killing. One was from ROS-dependent activation of ATM via AMPK-ULK1-ATG13-Beclin1/ATG5. Another pathway was from CD95 via caspase 8-RIP1/RIP3. A third was from reduced expression of HSP70, HSP90, HDAC6 and phosphorylation of eIF2α. Downstream of the mitochondrion both caspase 9 and AIF played roles in tumor cell execution. Knock down of ATM/AMPK/ULK-1 prevented ATG13 phosphorylation and degradation of RAS and Gα proteins. Over-expression of activated mTOR prevented ATG13 phosphorylation and suppressed killing. Knock down of eIF2α maintained BCL-XL and MCL-1 expression. Within 6h, [neratinib + entinostat] reduced the expression of the immunology biomarkers PD-L1, ODC, IDO-1 and enhanced MHCA levels. Our data demonstrate that [neratinib + entinostat] down-regulates oncogenic RAS and the two key oncogenic drivers present in most uveal melanoma patients and causes a multifactorial form of killing via mitochondrial dysfunction and toxic autophagy.
Abbreviations: ERK: extracellular regulated kinase; PI3K: phosphatidyl inositol 3 kinase; ca: constitutively active; dn: dominant negative; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; AIF: apoptosis inducing factor; AMPK: AMP-dependent protein kinase; mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin; JAK: Janus Kinase; STAT: Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription; MAPK: mitogen activated protein kinase; PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homologue on chromosome ten; ROS: reactive oxygen species; CMV: empty vector plasmid or virus; si: small interfering; SCR: scrambled; IP: immunoprecipitation; VEH: vehicle; HDAC: histone deacetylase.
... However, as also proposed by these authors [35], we cannot rule out a cross-reaction of the antibody used in our study with an undetermined nuclear protein that is also expressed after induction of KRAS(G12V). In this context, the selectivity and sensitivity of isoform-and mutation-specific RAS antibodies has been extensively investigated previously [36]. However, the antibody used in our work (Abcam, cat. ...
... However, the antibody used in our work (Abcam, cat. # ab157255) was not tested in the study by Waters et al. [36]. While being cautious about the specificity of KRAS antibodies, we are investigating the possible function of nuclear KRAS(G12V). ...
... While being cautious about the specificity of KRAS antibodies, we are investigating the possible function of nuclear KRAS(G12V). Waters et al. [36]. While being cautious about the specificity of KRAS antibodies, we are investigating the possible function of nuclear KRAS(G12V). ...
Ionizing radiation (IR) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulate Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) phosphorylation at Ser-102 in KRAS wild-type (KRASwt) cells, whereas in KRAS mutated (KRASmut) cells, YB-1 is constitutively phosphorylated, independent of IR or EGF. YB-1 activity stimulates the repair of IR-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the nucleus. Thus far, the YB-1 nuclear translocation pattern after cell exposure to various cellular stressors is not clear. In the present study, we investigated the pattern of YB-1 phosphorylation and its possible translocation to the nucleus in KRASwt cells after exposure to IR, EGF treatment, and conditional expression of mutated KRAS(G12V). IR, EGF, and conditional KRAS(G12V) expression induced YB-1 phosphorylation in both the cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions of KRASwt cells. None of the stimuli induced YB-1 nuclear translocation, while p90 ribosomal s6 kinase (RSK) translocation was enhanced in KRASwt cells after any of the stimuli. EGF-induced RSK translocation to the nucleus and nuclear YB-1 phosphorylation were completely blocked by the EGF receptor kinase inhibitor erlotinib. Likewise, RSK inhibition blocked RSK nuclear translocation and nuclear YB-1 phosphorylation after irradiation and KRAS(G12V) overexpression. In summary, acute stimulation of YB-1 phosphorylation does not lead to YB-1 translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Rather, irradiation, EGF treatment, or KRAS(G12V) overexpression induces RSK activation, leading to its translocation to the nucleus, where it activates already-existing nuclear YB-1. Our novel finding illuminates the signaling pathways involved in nuclear YB-1 phosphorylation and provides a rationale for designing appropriate targeting strategies to block YB-1 in oncology as well as in radiation oncology.
... The expression pattern of the mouse Kras gene characterized by Northern blotting and quantitative real-time PCR revealed substantial variations in Kras expression among different organs and during development, from embryogenesis to adulthood (Leon et al., 1987;Newlaczyl et al., 2017). At the protein level, despite the importance of KRAS in health and disease, the lack of KRAS antibodies functional for tissue immunostaining prevented the characterization of KRAS protein expression and subcellular localization in vivo (Waters et al., 2017). Therefore, understanding RAS-driven developmental defects and tumor initiation remains complex. ...
... Since its discovery more than 40 years ago, multiple functions have been attributed to KRAS, including in cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. From immunostaining studies performed shortly after its discovery (Chesa et al., 1987;Furth et al., 1987), it was assumed that KRAS was expressed ubiquitously; however, these studies have not been confirmed, and their conclusions were challenged when the capacity of available anti-KRAS antibodies to immunostain KRAS on tissues was questioned (Waters et al., 2017). ...
KRAS mutants are common in many cancers and wild-type KRAS is essential in development as its absence causes embryonic lethality. Despite this critical role in development and disease, the normal expression pattern of KRAS protein is still largely unknown at the tissue level due to the lack of valid antibodies. To address this issue, we used the citrine-Kras mouse model in which the Citrine-KRAS (Cit-K) fusion protein functions as a validated surrogate of endogenous KRAS protein that can be detected on tissue sections by immunolabeling with a GFP antibody. In the embryo, we found expression of KRAS protein in a wide range of organs and tissues. This expression tends to decrease near birth, mainly in mesenchymal cells. During transition to the adult stage, the dynamics of KRAS protein expression vary among organs and detection of KRAS becomes restricted to specific cell types. Furthermore, we found that steady state KRAS protein expression is detectable at the cell membrane and in the cytoplasm and that this subcellular partitioning differed among cell types. Our results reveal hitherto unanticipated dynamics in developmental, tissular, cell-specific and subcellular expression of KRAS protein. They provide insight into the reason why specific cell-types are sensitive to KRAS mutations during cancer initiation.
... This is followed by NRAS (12%) mutations, which are predominant in cutaneous melanoma and acute myelogenous leukemia. However, HRAS mutations that are found in bladder and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas are infrequently seen in other types of cancers [4]. According to the COSMIC v94 database, 99% of KRAS mutations are missense mutations, mainly with a gain of function. ...
... To our knowledge, there are almost no effective targeted therapies for PDAC targeting RAS signaling yet. This is because the accomplishment of RAS signaling and activation is primarily through protein-protein interactions, which are difficult to target with small molecules, since the binding pocket is not well defined [4,73]. Furthermore, immunotherapy has had minimal clinical success in pancreatic cancer; thus, it is not yet included in the clinical guidelines. ...
The most frequent mutated oncogene family in the history of human cancer is the RAS gene family, including NRAS, HRAS, and, most importantly, KRAS. A hallmark of pancreatic cancer, recalcitrant cancer with a very low survival rate, is the prevalence of oncogenic mutations in the KRAS gene. Due to this fact, studying the function of KRAS and the impact of its mutations on the tumor microenvironment (TME) is a priority for understanding pancreatic cancer progression and designing novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of the dismal disease. Despite some recent enlightening studies, there is still a wide gap in our knowledge regarding the impact of KRAS mutations on different components of the pancreatic TME. In this review, we will present an updated summary of mutant KRAS role in the initiation, progression, and modulation of the TME of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This review will highlight the intriguing link between diabetes mellitus and PDAC, as well as vitamin D as an adjuvant effective therapy via TME modulation of PDAC. We will also discuss different ongoing clinical trials that use KRAS oncogene signaling network as therapeutic targets.
... By contrast, Ras-GTP levels in the Mac1 + BM cells of Mx1-Cre Kras LSL-P34R/+ mice were similar to those of WT cells under both starved and stimulated conditions. This almost certainly reflects the reduced binding affinity of K-Ras P34R for Raf (12,33,34) rather than a true reduction in Ras-GTP levels, particularly as K-Ras P34R accumulates in the GTP-bound conformation when overexpressed in cell lines (8). ...
... The availability of mice harboring 3 different conditional Kras mutant alleles on the same B6 strain background (Kras LSL-P34R , Kras LSL-T58I , and Kras LSL-G12D ) allowed us to directly compare the cell biologic and biochemical consequences of expressing physiologic levels of the respective proteins in defined populations of primary BM cells, with the caveat that interpreting Ras-GTP data from Mx1-Cre Kras LSL-P34R/+ BM cells is problematic, because of the reduced affinity of K-Ras P34R for the Raf1 Ras-binding domain peptide used in the pulldown assay (12,33,34). We found that c-kit+; Mac1 -BM progenitors from Mx1-Cre Kras LSL-G12D mice were hyperproliferative over a range of GM-CSF concentrations, whereas cells from WT, Mx1-Cre Kras LSL-P34R , and Mx1-Cre Kras LSL-T58I mice exhibited similar growth properties. ...
Somatic KRAS mutations are highly prevalent in many human cancers. In addition, a distinct spectrum of germline KRAS mutations cause developmental disorders called RASopathies. The mutant proteins encoded by these germline KRAS mutations are less biochemically and functionally activated than the mutant proteins found in cancer. We generated mice harboring conditional KrasLSL-P34R and KrasLSL-T58I "knock in" alleles and characterized the consequences of each mutation in vivo. Embryonic expression of KrasT58I resulted in craniofacial abnormalities reminiscent of RASopathy disorders, and these mice also exhibited hyperplastic growth of multiple organs, modest alterations in cardiac valvulogenesis, myocardial hypertrophy, and myeloproliferation. By contrast, embryonic KrasP34R expression resulted in early perinatal lethality from respiratory failure due to defective lung sacculation, which was associated with aberrant ERK activity in lung epithelial cells. Somatic Mx1-Cre-mediated activation in the hematopoietic compartment showed that KrasP34R and KrasT58I expression had distinct signaling effects despite causing a similar spectrum of hematologic diseases. These novel mouse strains are robust models for investigating the consequences of endogenous hyperactive K-Ras signaling in different developing and adult tissues, for comparing how oncogenic and germline K-Ras proteins perturb signaling networks and cell fate decisions, and for performing preclinical therapeutic trials.
... The MAPK and the PI3K signaling recovered to the baseline between 15 and 30 min following switch back to the isotonic medium (Figs 6B and S5B). To further validate the role of K-Ras in the MAPK response to changing PM curvature, we used various Ras-less mouse epithelial fibroblast (MEF) lines, which have all the endogenous Ras isoforms knocked down and stably express a specific Ras mutant (66). We focused specifically on three Ras-less MEF lines: (1) K-Ras G12V MEF line contains only K-Ras G12V but no other endogenous Ras isoforms, (2) BRaf V600E MEF line contains the constitutively active oncogenic mutant of a K-Ras effector BRaf V600E and no endogenous Ras, and Figure 6. ...
... (3) wild-type MEF line contains all the endogenous Ras isoforms (66). The pERK level in the K-Ras G12V -MEF increased upon hypotonic condition more efficiently than that in the wild-type MEF line containing endogenous Ras isoforms (Figs 6C and S5C). ...
Plasma membrane (PM) curvature defines cell shape and intracellular organelle morphologies and is a fundamental cell property. Growth/proliferation is more stimulated in flatter cells than the same cells in elongated shapes. PM-anchored K-Ras small GTPase regulates cell growth/proliferation and plays key roles in cancer. The lipid-anchored K-Ras form nanoclusters selectively enriched with specific phospholipids, such as phosphatidylserine (PS), for efficient effector recruitment and activation. K-Ras function may, thus, be sensitive to changing lipid distribution at membranes with different curvatures. Here, we used complementary methods to manipulate membrane curvature of intact/live cells, native PM blebs, and synthetic liposomes. We show that the spatiotemporal organization and signaling of an oncogenic mutant K-Ras
G12V
favor flatter membranes with low curvature. Our findings are consistent with the more stimulated growth/proliferation in flatter cells. Depletion of endogenous PS abolishes K-Ras
G12V
PM curvature sensing. In cells and synthetic bilayers, only mixed-chain PS species, but not other PS species tested, mediate K-Ras
G12V
membrane curvature sensing. Thus, K-Ras nanoclusters act as relay stations to convert mechanical perturbations to mitogenic signaling.
... As KRAS-mutant NSCLC tumors are extremely heterogenous, largely due to the diversity of their genetic alterations [9], comparing KRAS-mutant phenotypes using patient samples or NSCLC cell lines is challenging. Therefore, we began by using a panel of isogenic MEFs, initially engineered to become 'Ras-less' [30] and further genetically modified to express either KRAS WT , KRAS G12C or KRAS G12D [31]. Therefore, we could compare KRAS mutant isoforms directly without the confounding effects of co-mutations seen in lung tumors. ...
Introduction
KRASG12C and KRASG12D inhibitors represent a major translational breakthrough for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cancer in general by directly targeting its most mutated oncoprotein. However, resistance to these small molecules has highlighted the need for rational combination partners necessitating a critical understanding of signaling downstream of KRAS mutant isoforms.
Methods
We contrasted tumor development between KrasG12C and KrasG12D genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs). To corroborate findings and determine mutant subtype-specific dependencies, isogenic models of KrasG12C and KrasG12D initiation and adaptation were profiled by RNA sequencing. We also employed cell line models of established KRAS mutant NSCLC and determined therapeutic vulnerabilities through pharmacological inhibition. We analysed differences in survival outcomes for patients affected by advanced KRASG12C or KRASG12D-mutant NSCLC.
Results
KRASG12D exhibited higher potency in vivo, manifesting as more rapid lung tumor formation and reduced survival of KRASG12D GEMMs compared to KRASG12C. This increased potency, recapitulated in an isogenic initiation model, was associated with enhanced PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling. However, KRASG12C oncogenicity and downstream pathway activation were comparable with KRASG12D at later stages of tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo, consistent with similar clinical outcomes in patients. Despite this, established KRASG12D NSCLC models depended more on the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, while KRASG12C models on the MAPK pathway. Specifically, KRASG12D inhibition was enhanced by AKT inhibition in vitro and in vivo.
Conclusions
Our data highlight a unique combination treatment vulnerability and suggest that patient selection strategies for combination approaches using direct KRAS inhibitors should be i) contextualised to individual RAS mutants, and ii) tailored to their downstream signaling.
... Given the functional role of MVP in Golgi Ras activity (Fig. 3d), we wondered whether MVP is in proximity with Ras itself. Using the best available antibodies for the different Ras isoforms 23 , we observed that MVP's colocalization with WT H/NRas increased upon AMG-510 treatment but this was not the case for KRas (Extended Data Fig. 7a,b). At the single-cell level, MVP's colocalization with H/NRas correlated well with Golgi Ras activity but KRas-MVP colocalization was negatively correlated with Golgi Ras activity (Extended Data Fig. 7c) presumably because of H/NRas but not KRas being endomembrane localized. ...
Clinical resistance to rat sarcoma virus (Ras)-G12C inhibitors is a challenge. A subpopulation of cancer cells has been shown to undergo genomic and transcriptional alterations to facilitate drug resistance but the immediate adaptive effects on Ras signaling in response to these drugs at the single-cell level is not well understood. Here, we used Ras biosensors to profile the activity and signaling environment of endogenous Ras at the single-cell level. We found that a subpopulation of KRas-G12C cells treated with Ras-G12C-guanosine-diphosphate inhibitors underwent adaptive signaling and metabolic changes driven by wild-type Ras at the Golgi and mutant KRas at the mitochondria, respectively. Our Ras biosensors identified major vault protein as a mediator of Ras activation through its scaffolding of Ras signaling pathway components and metabolite channels. Overall, methods including ours that facilitate direct analysis on the single-cell level can report the adaptations that subpopulations of cells adopt in response to cancer therapies, thus providing insight into drug resistance.
... The KRAS expression was Fig. 4, Figure_S4). Relative high protein abundance of endogenous K-Ras4B in long-term cultures and primary cultures (GBM, WHO grade 4) were assessed by semiquantitative western blot analysis with a panel of commercial antibodies specific for KRAS4B [50] (data not shown). ...
Background
KRAS is the undisputed champion of oncogenes, and despite its prominent role in oncogenesis as mutated gene, KRAS mutation appears infrequent in gliomas. Nevertheless, gliomas are considered KRAS-driven cancers due to its essential role in mouse malignant gliomagenesis. Glioblastoma is the most lethal primary brain tumor, often associated with disturbed RAS signaling. For newly diagnosed GBM, the current standard therapy is alkylating agent chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy. Cisplatin is one of the most effective anticancer drugs and is used as a first-line treatment for a wide spectrum of solid tumors (including medulloblastoma and neuroblastoma) and many studies are currently focused on new delivery modalities of effective cisplatin in glioblastoma. Its mechanism of action is mainly based on DNA damage, inducing the formation of DNA adducts, triggering a series of signal-transduction pathways, leading to cell-cycle arrest, DNA repair and apoptosis.
Methods
Long-term cultures of human glioblastoma, U87MG and U251MG, were either treated with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (cisplatin, CDDP) and/or MEK-inhibitor PD98059. Cytotoxic responses were assessed by cell viability (MTT), protein expression (Western Blot), cell cycle (PI staining) and apoptosis (TUNEL) assays. Further, gain-of-function experiments were performed with cells over-expressing mutated hypervariable region (HVR) KRASG12V plasmids.
Results
Here, we studied platinum-based chemosensitivity of long-term cultures of human glioblastoma from the perspective of KRAS expression, by using CDDP and MEK-inhibitor. Endogenous high KRAS expression was assessed at transcriptional (qPCR) and translational levels (WB) in a panel of primary and long-term glioblastoma cultures. Firstly, we measured immediate cellular adjustment through direct regulation of protein concentration of K-Ras4B in response to cisplatin treatment. We found increased endogenous protein abundance and involvement of the effector pathway RAF/MEK/ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade. Moreover, as many MEK inhibitors are currently being clinically evaluated for the treatment of high-grade glioma, so we concomitantly tested the effect of the potent and selective non-ATP-competitive MEK1/2 inhibitor (PD98059) on cisplatin-induced chemosensitivity in these cells. Cell-cycle phase distribution was examined using flow cytometry showing a significant cell-cycle arrest in both cultures at different percentage, which is modulated by MEK inhibition. Cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity increased sub-G1 percentage and modulates G2/M checkpoint regulators cyclins D1 and A. Moreover, ectopic expression of a constitutively active KRASG12V rescued CDDP-induced apoptosis and different HVR point mutations (particularly Ala 185) reverted this phenotype.
Conclusion
These findings warrant further studies of clinical applications of MEK1/2 inhibitors and KRAS as ‘actionable target’ of cisplatin-based chemotherapy for glioblastoma.
... 49 Despite the availability of Western blotting using Ras-specic antibodies for detecting Ras proteins, limited Ras immunoassays have been established to date. 51,52 Additionally, since Ras is an intracellular protein that has not been investigated as a biomarker, its concentration in the blood remains unknown. Thus, developing a sensitive tool capable of accurately quantifying Ras protein levels is crucial. ...
Although nanotechnologies have attractive attributes in cancer therapy, their full potential has yet to be realized due to challenges in their translation to clinical settings. The evaluation of cancer nanomedicine efficacy in preclinical in vivo studies is limited to tumor size and animal survival metrics, which do not provide adequate understanding of the nanomedicine's mechanism of action. To address this, we have developed an integrated pipeline called nanoSimoa that combines an ultrasensitive protein detection technique (Simoa) with cancer nanomedicine. As a proof-of concept, we assessed the therapeutic efficacy of an ultrasound-responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticle (MSN) drug delivery system on OVCAR-3 ovarian cancer cells using CCK-8 assays to evaluate cell viability and Simoa assays to measure IL-6 protein levels. The results demonstrated significant reductions in both IL-6 levels and cell viability following nanomedicine treatment. In addition, a Ras Simoa assay (limit of detection: 0.12 pM) was developed to detect and quantify Ras protein levels in OVCAR-3 cells, which are undetectable by commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). These results suggest that nanoSimoa has the potential to guide the development of cancer nanomedicines and predict their behavior in vivo, making it a valuable tool for preclinical testing and accelerating the development of precision medicine if its generalizability is confirmed.
... Next, we aimed to visualize the interaction between Pept-ins and KRAS in a cellular context. In concordance with a previous report from Waters et al. (44), we noticed that currently available RAS antibodies are not suitable for immunofluorescence. To solve this issue, we created two reporter cell lines (HeLa), expressing an mCherry-KRAS fusion for WT and G12V, respectively, and taking a cell line expressing mCherry along as a basic control. ...
Mutant KRAS is a major driver of oncogenesis in a multitude of cancers but remains a challenging target for classical small molecule drugs, motivating the exploration of alternative approaches. Here, we show that aggregation-prone regions (APRs) in the primary sequence of the oncoprotein constitute intrinsic vulnerabilities that can be exploited to misfold KRAS into protein aggregates. Conveniently, this propensity that is present in wild-type KRAS is increased in the common oncogenic mutations at positions 12 and 13. We show that synthetic peptides (Pept-ins™) derived from two distinct KRAS APRs could induce the misfolding and subsequent loss of function of oncogenic KRAS, both of recombinantly produced protein in solution, during cell-free translation and in cancer cells. The Pept-ins exerted antiproliferative activity against a range of mutant KRAS cell lines and abrogated tumor growth in a syngeneic lung adenocarcinoma mouse model driven by mutant KRAS G12V. These findings provide proof-of-concept that the intrinsic misfolding propensity of the KRAS oncoprotein can be exploited to cause its functional inactivation.
... More recently, using qRT-PCR Aran and colleagues found that the KRAS4B transcript was two-fold higher than that of KRAS4A in 55 samples of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but relative to normal lung tissue KRAS4A message was elevated in 42 of 55 patients (Aran et al., 2018). These authors also reported enhanced KRAS4A protein using immunohistochemistry (IHC), however no controls were shown and no commercial antibody has been validated for detection of endogenous RAS by IHC (Waters et al., 2017). Another study of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients analyzed RNA expression and somatic mutation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 516) to assess the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) based on the abundance of KRAS transcript variants (Yang and Kim, 2018). ...
The three mammalian RAS genes (HRAS, NRAS and KRAS) encode four proteins that play central roles in cancer biology. Among them, KRAS is mutated more frequently in human cancer than any other oncogene. The pre-mRNA of KRAS is alternatively spliced to give rise to two products, KRAS4A and KRAS4B, which differ in the membrane targeting sequences at their respective C-termini. Notably, both KRAS4A and KRAS4B are oncogenic when KRAS is constitutively activated by mutation in exon 2 or 3. Whereas KRAS4B is the most studied oncoprotein, KRAS4A is understudied and until recently considered relatively unimportant. Emerging work has confirmed expression of KRAS4A in cancer and found non-overlapping functions of the splice variants. The most clearly demonstrated of these is direct regulation of hexokinase 1 by KRAS4A, suggesting that the metabolic vulnerabilities of KRAS-mutant tumors may be determined in part by the relative expression of the splice variants. The aim of this review is to address the most relevant characteristics and differential functions of the KRAS splice variants as they relate to cancer onset and progression.
... Next, we took an orthogonal approach to study the relationship between NRAS mRNA levels and DCIS progression. NRAS-specific antibodies are not available for robust analyses of clinical samples [24], and we thus performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on tissue microarrays (TMAs) consisting of 22 concurrent DCIS/IDC lesions, as well as adjacent normal tissues (Additional file 1: Table S1). Using an NRAS-specific probe (Fig. 1B), the FISH data were quantified to show that NRAS mRNA levels are significantly higher in DCIS than in the normal regions (Fig. 1C, E). ...
Background
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the most common type of in situ premalignant breast cancers. What drives DCIS to invasive breast cancer is unclear. Basal-like invasive breast cancers are aggressive. We have previously shown that NRAS is highly expressed selectively in basal-like subtypes of invasive breast cancers and can promote their growth and progression. In this study, we investigated whether NRAS expression at the DCIS stage can control transition from luminal DCIS to basal-like invasive breast cancers.
Methods
Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed to assess expression of NRAS in DCIS compared to invasive breast tumors in patients. NRAS mRNA levels were also determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in patient tumor microarrays (TMAs) with concurrent normal, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer, and association of NRAS mRNA levels with DCIS and invasive breast cancer was assessed by paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Pearson’s correlation was calculated between NRAS mRNA levels and basal biomarkers in the TMAs, as well as in patient datasets. RNA-seq data were generated in cell lines, and unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed after combining with RNA-seq data from a previously published patient cohort.
Results
Invasive breast cancers showed higher NRAS mRNA levels compared to DCIS samples. These NRAShigh lesions were also enriched with basal-like features, such as basal gene expression signatures, lower ER, and higher p53 protein and Ki67 levels. We have shown previously that NRAS drives aggressive features in DCIS-like and basal-like SUM102PT cells. Here, we found that NRAS-silencing induced a shift to a luminal gene expression pattern. Conversely, NRAS overexpression in the luminal DCIS SUM225 cells induced a basal-like gene expression pattern, as well as an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition signature. Furthermore, these cells formed disorganized mammospheres containing cell masses with an apparent reduction in adhesion.
Conclusions
These data suggest that elevated NRAS levels in DCIS are not only a marker but can also control the emergence of basal-like features leading to more aggressive tumor activity, thus supporting the therapeutic hypothesis that targeting NRAS and/or downstream pathways may block disease progression for a subset of DCIS patients with high NRAS.
... Examination of the tumor tissues from this xenograft model treated with either YUM70 or vehicle control revealed a significant reduction of KRAS protein level in the YUM70-treated tumor tissues compared to vehicle control ( Fig. 3 G, H). For this analysis, Western blots were performed to detect the KRAS protein levels due to issues raised towards the selectivity and sensitivity of commercially available anti-KRAS antibodies for immunofluorescence or immunohistochemical analyses [39] . Collectively, our results showed that tissues were harvested from the mice at the end of the treatment and subjected to Western blot analysis for KRAS protein level with GAPDH serving as loading control. ...
KRAS is the most commonly mutated oncogene in human cancers with limited therapeutic options, thus there is a critical need to identify novel targets and inhibiting agents. The 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein GRP78, which is upregulated in KRAS cancers, is an essential chaperone and the master regulator of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Following up on our recent discoveries that GRP78 haploinsufficiency suppresses both KRASG12D-driven pancreatic and lung tumorigenesis, we seek to determine the underlying mechanisms. Here, we report that knockdown of GRP78 via siRNA reduced oncogenic KRAS protein level in human lung, colon, and pancreatic cancer cells bearing various KRAS mutations. This effect was at the post-transcriptional level and is independent of proteasomal degradation or autophagy. Moreover, targeting GRP78 via small molecule inhibitors such as HA15 and YUM70 with anti-cancer activities while sparing normal cells significantly suppressed oncogenic KRAS expression in vitro and in vivo, associating with onset of apoptosis and loss of viability in cancer cells bearing various KRAS mutations. Collectively, our studies reveal that GRP78 is a previously unidentified regulator of oncogenic KRAS expression, and, as such, augments the other anti-cancer activities of GRP78 small molecule inhibitors to potentially achieve general, long-term suppression of mutant KRAS-driven tumorigenesis.
... Third, using an endomembrane mCherry tagged protein and K-RAS V12-GFP, the coefficient of GFP movement from the plasma membrane to endomembrane structures was calculated [66] . Using previously established approaches, we validated our K-RAS and N-RAS antibodies against their advertised target proteins; knock down of either protein resulted in reduced immunofluorescence staining for K-/N-RAS but did not reduce the expression of ERK2 [67] . ...
The majority of scientists working in the field of cancer experimental therapeutics recognize that many drugs that claim to be “specific” for one target enzyme in fact regulate to varying degrees the activities of other additional protein targets. Some of these targets are known and are recognized as being an essential component of a drug’s biology. However, many other targets fall into the category of “unknown unknowns”. Thus, the collective therapeutic outcome for almost all clinically relevant drugs is reliant on both the claimed primary and secondary “on” targets as well as some of the unexpected unknown “off” targets. This review discusses the biology of several FDA approved cancer therapeutic drugs whose initial reported targets only represented the tip-of-the-iceberg in terms of how each agent acted as an anti-tumor drug. The review also discusses a putative thorough pre-visualization methodology for drug-based research, prior to executing any wet work. These approaches should be performed in an agnostic fashion and be based in part on the clinically safe drug’s C max and its area under the curve in a patient. Based on tumor heterogeneity, considerations of how to approach developmental therapeutics in the age of “personalized medicine” are also discussed.
... The cells were lysed with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) buffer containing 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitor (Calbiochem). After evaluating the specificity to detect KRAS, not NRAS and HRAS, proteins by KRAS antibody (Santa Cruz), we used anti-KRAS antibody for immunoprecipitation 98 . Endogenous KRAS was immunoprecipitated from the cell lysates with a specific antibody, and the precipitated proteins subjected to SDS-PAGE. ...
Recent development of the chemical inhibitors specific to oncogenic KRAS (Kirsten Rat Sarcoma 2 Viral Oncogene Homolog) mutants revives much interest to control KRAS-driven cancers. Here, we report that AIMP2-DX2, a variant of the tumor suppressor AIMP2 (aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase-interacting multi-functional protein 2), acts as a cancer-specific regulator of KRAS stability, augmenting KRAS-driven tumorigenesis. AIMP2-DX2 specifically binds to the hypervariable region and G-domain of KRAS in the cytosol prior to farnesylation. Then, AIMP2-DX2 competitively blocks the access of Smurf2 (SMAD Ubiquitination Regulatory Factor 2) to KRAS, thus preventing ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Moreover, AIMP2-DX2 levels are positively correlated with KRAS levels in colon and lung cancer cell lines and tissues. We also identified a small molecule that specifically bound to the KRAS-binding region of AIMP2-DX2 and inhibited the interaction between these two factors. Treatment with this compound reduces the cellular levels of KRAS, leading to the suppression of KRAS-dependent cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. These results suggest the interface of AIMP2-DX2 and KRAS as a route to control KRAS-driven cancers. Direct targeting of oncogenic KRAS activity is a challenge. Here the authors report that a splice variant of AIMP2, AIMP2-DX2, enhances KRAS stability by blocking ubiquitin-mediated degradation of KRAS via the E3 ligase, Smurf2, and identify a chemical that can hinder AIMP2-DX2 from interacting with KRAS.
... It is important to note that we only studied the effect of HRAS. NRAS and KRAS will need to be examined independently, and this will be supported by RAS isoform-specific antibodies 51 . Given the observations that H, N, and KRAS-mutant eRMS are associated with specific age ranges and anatomic locations, this will contribute to the understanding of the role of dysregulated development in R-eRMS 52 . ...
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common pediatric soft tissue sarcoma. The two predominant histologic variants of RMS, embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (eRMS and aRMS, respectively), carry very different prognoses. While eRMS is associated with an intermediate prognosis, the 5-year survival rate of aRMS is less than 30%. The RMS subtypes are also different at the molecular level—eRMS frequently has multiple genetic alterations, including mutations in RAS and TP53 , whereas aRMS often has chromosomal translocations resulting in PAX3-FOXO1 or PAX7-FOXO1 fusions, but otherwise has a “quiet” genome. Interestingly, mutations in RAS are rarely found in aRMS. In this study, we explored the role of oncogenic RAS in aRMS. We found that while ectopic oncogenic HRAS expression was tolerated in the human RAS-driven eRMS cell line RD, it was detrimental to cell growth and proliferation in the human aRMS cell line Rh28. Growth inhibition was mediated by oncogene-induced senescence and associated with increased RB pathway activity and expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p16 and p21. Unexpectedly, the human eRMS cell line RMS-YM, a RAS wild-type eRMS cell line, also exhibited growth inhibition in response to oncogenic HRAS in a manner similar to aRMS Rh28 cells. This work suggests that oncogenic RAS is expressed in a context-dependent manner in RMS and may provide insight into the differential origins and therapeutic opportunities for RMS subtypes.
... Despite the development of theoretical tools for predicting most immunogenic structures (such as 3D modeling of immune complexes and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis [29][30][31][32]), the established regularities often only relate to certain classes of chemical compounds and cannot be transferred to other classes without additional theoretical analysis and experimental verification. Another way to change selectivity is mutational modification, including targeted genetic design of the antigen-binding sites of antibodies [33,34]. However, these works require very significant additional time and resources and are currently limited to a short list of successful developments. ...
Many applications of immunoassays involve the possible presence of structurally similar compounds that bind with antibodies, but with different affinities. In this regard, an important characteristic of an immunoassay is its cross-reactivity: the possibility of detecting various compounds in comparison with a certain standard. Based on cross-reactivity, analytical systems are assessed as either high-selective (responding strictly to a specific compound) or low-selective (responding to a number of similar compounds). The present study demonstrates that cross-reactivity is not an intrinsic characteristic of antibodies but can vary for different formats of competitive immunoassays using the same antibodies. Assays with sensitive detection of markers and, accordingly, implementation at low concentrations of antibodies and modified (competing) antigens are characterized by lower cross-reactivities and are, thus, more specific than assays requiring high concentrations of markers and interacting reagents. This effect was confirmed by both mathematical modeling and experimental comparison of an enzyme immunoassay and a fluorescence polarization immunoassay of sulfonamides and fluoroquinolones. Thus, shifting to lower concentrations of reagents decreases cross-reactivities by up to five-fold. Moreover, the cross-reactivities are changed even in the same assay format by varying the ratio of immunoreactants’ concentrations and shifting from the kinetic or equilibrium mode of the antigen-antibody reaction. The described patterns demonstrate the possibility of modulating immunodetection selectivity without searching for new binding reactants.
... Moreover, the sustained pulsatile dynamics of the residual ERK activity indicates ongoing EGFR-mediated signalling through the non-inhibited wild-type RAS isoforms (Fig. 5a-c). Finally, expression of EKAREN5 in RASless MEFs, in which reconstituted KRAS mutants (G12C, G12D, G12V or G13D) replace all deleted endogenous RAS isoforms 48 , revealed substantially boosted ERK activity upon EGF stimulation (Fig. 5d). Although mutant KRAS isoforms established higher basal ERK levels (Fig. 5d′), their signal transduction effectivity is enhanced upon EGFR activation, similar to their wild-type counterparts. ...
Direct targeting of the downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway to suppress extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK) activation in KRAS and BRAF mutant colorectal cancer (CRC) has proven clinically unsuccessful, but promising results have been obtained with combination therapies including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition. To elucidate the interplay between EGF signalling and ERK activation in tumours, we used patient-derived organoids (PDOs) from KRAS and BRAF mutant CRCs. PDOs resemble in vivo tumours, model treatment response and are compatible with live-cell microscopy. We established real-time, quantitative drug response assessment in PDOs with single-cell resolution, using our improved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based ERK biosensor EKAREN5. We show that oncogene-driven signalling is strikingly limited without EGFR activity and insufficient to sustain full proliferative potential. In PDOs and in vivo, upstream EGFR activity rigorously amplifies signal transduction efficiency in KRAS or BRAF mutant MAPK pathways. Our data provide a mechanistic understanding of the effectivity of EGFR inhibitors within combination therapies against KRAS and BRAF mutant CRC. Ponsioen et al. use a FRET‐based ERK biosensor EKAREN5 in patient‐derived organoids to show that EGFR activity amplifies signal transduction efficiency in KRAS or BRAF mutant MAPK pathways.
... The lack of antibodies enabling to detect KRAS protein on tissue sections severely hampers the characterization of the mechanisms of differential tissue sensitivity to oncogenic Kras mutations (13). Therefore, we generated new mouse models in which a citrine gene (an improved version of YFP) is fused in frame in the wild-type (WT) Kras gene (Cit-K allele) or mutated Kras G12D gene in LSL-Kras G12D mice (Cit-K G12D allele; Fig. 1A and B; ref. 4). ...
Pancreatic acinar cells are a cell type of origin for pancreatic cancer that become progressively less sensitive to tumorigenesis induced by oncogenic Kras mutations after birth. This sensitivity is increased when Kras mutations are combined with pancreatitis. Molecular mechanisms underlying these observations are still largely unknown. To identify these mechanisms, we generated the first CRISPR-edited mouse models that enable detection of wild-type and mutant KRAS proteins in vivo. Analysis of these mouse models revealed that more than 75% of adult acinar cells are devoid of detectable KRAS protein. In the 25% of acinar cells expressing KRAS protein, transcriptomic analysis highlighted a slight upregulation of the RAS and MAPK pathways. However, at the protein level, only marginal pancreatic expression of essential KRAS effectors, including C-RAF, was observed. The expression of KRAS and its effectors gradually decreased after birth. The low sensitivity of adult acinar cells to Kras mutations resulted from low expression of KRAS and its effectors and the subsequent lack of activation of RAS/MAPK pathways. Pancreatitis triggered expression of KRAS and its effectors as well as subsequent activation of downstream signaling; this induction required the activity of EGFR. Finally, expression of C-RAF in adult pancreas was required for pancreatic tumorigenesis. In conclusion, our study reveals that control of the expression of KRAS and its effectors regulates the sensitivity of acinar cells to transformation by oncogenic Kras mutations.
Significance
This study generates new mouse models to study regulation of KRAS during pancreatic tumorigenesis and highlights a novel mechanism through which pancreatitis sensitizes acinar cells to Kras mutations.
... The subcellular localization of endogenous RAS proteins cannot be determined by immunofluorescence because none of the many anti-RAS antibodies are sufficiently sensitive (Waters et al, 2017). We have therefore studied the localization of endogenous RAS proteins by subcellular fractionation using nitrogen cavitation followed by differential centrifugation (Choy et al, 1999;Zhou and Philips, 2017). ...
Isoprenylcysteine carboxyl methyltransferase (ICMT) is the third of three enzymes that sequentially modify the C-terminus of CaaX proteins, including RAS. Although all four RAS proteins are substrates for ICMT, each traffics to membranes differently by virtue of their hypervariable regions that are differentially palmitoylated. We found that among RAS proteins, NRAS was unique in requiring ICMT for delivery to the PM, a consequence of having only a single palmitoylation site as its secondary affinity module. Although not absolutely required for palmitoylation, acylation was diminished in the absence of ICMT. Photoactivation and FRAP of GFP-NRAS revealed increase flux at the Golgi, independent of palmitoylation, in the absence of ICMT. Association of NRAS with the prenyl-protein chaperone PDE6δ also required ICMT and promoted anterograde trafficking from the Golgi. We conclude that carboxyl methylation of NRAS is required for efficient palmitoylation, PDE6δ binding, and homeostatic flux through the Golgi, processes that direct delivery to the plasma membrane.
... enable systematic studies of such recurrent cancer mutations. Antibodies are already available against some recurrent mutations [46,47], and this range could be expanded. Given sufficiently selective and sensitive protein assays, a repertoire of tests targeting recurrent mutant forms of dominant oncogenes could therefore furnish generally useful protein assays for follow-up and maybe also for de novo detection of malignant disease, complementing analyses for tumor-specific mutations at the DNA or RNA level. ...
Cancer diagnostics based on the detection of protein biomarkers in blood has promising potential for early detection and continuous monitoring of disease. However, the currently‐available protein biomarkers and assay formats largely fail to live up to expectations, mainly due to insufficient diagnostic specificity. Here, we discuss what kinds of plasma proteins might prove useful as biomarkers of malignant processes in specific organs. We consider the need to search for biomarkers deep down in the lowest reaches of the proteome, below current detection levels. In this regard we comment on the poor molecular detection sensitivity of current protein assays compared to nucleic acid detection reactions, and we discuss requirements for achieving detection of vanishingly small amounts of proteins, to ensure detection of early stages of malignant growth through liquid biopsy.
... Unfortunately, it has to be pointed out that common methodological errors are also responsible for this discrepancy. For example, it was recently showed that many of the commercially available Ras antibodies do not recognize specifically their intended target and/or show affinity to other proteins that could lead to false results and conclusions [68]. Furthermore, none of the most frequently used antibodies except for SC-31 (from Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for N-Ras performed reliable results in immunocitochemistry; however, many studies show immunocitochemistry-based proof for prenylationinduced mislocalization of Ras proteins. ...
KRAS is one of the most commonly mutated oncogene and a negative predictive factor for a number of targeted therapies. Therefore, the development of targeting strategies against mutant KRAS is urgently needed. One potential strategy involves disruption of K-Ras membrane localization, which is necessary for its proper function. In this review, we summarize the current data about the importance of membrane-anchorage of K-Ras and provide a critical evaluation of this targeting paradigm focusing mainly on prenylation inhibition. Additionally, we performed a RAS mutation-specific analysis of prenylation-related drug sensitivity data from a publicly available database (https://depmap.org/repurposing/) of three classes of prenylation inhibitors: statins, N-bisphosphonates, and farnesyl-transferase inhibitors. We observed significant differences in sensitivity to N-bisphosphonates and farnesyl-transferase inhibitors depending on KRAS mutational status and tissue of origin. These observations emphasize the importance of factors affecting efficacy of prenylation inhibition, like distinct features of different KRAS mutations, tissue-specific mutational patterns, K-Ras turnover, and changes in regulation of prenylation process. Finally, we enlist the factors that might be responsible for the large discrepancy between the outcomes in preclinical and clinical studies including methodological pitfalls, the incomplete understanding of K-Ras protein turnover, and the variation of KRAS dependency in KRAS mutant tumors.
... Considering that RAS is known to localize to the plasma membrane 2,28 , we tested if RAS and the RAS-AGO2 interaction could be localized at the plasma membrane in the mouse models and human tissues. Since most commercial KRAS-specific antibodies have been shown to be unsuitable for IHC or immunofluorescence (IF) 29 , we tested RAS10, a pan-RAS monoclonal antibody, and observed specific staining only in RAS expressing cells (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 7b-c). Surprisingly, relative to the surrounding normal tissue, IHC and IF analysis of mouse pancreatic tissues with this antibody detected high membranous RAS expression within the PanINs (Fig. 5b). ...
Both KRAS and EGFR are essential mediators of pancreatic cancer development and interact with Argonaute 2 (AGO2) to perturb its function. Here, in a mouse model of mutant KRAS-driven pancreatic cancer, loss of AGO2 allows precursor lesion (PanIN) formation yet prevents progression to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Precursor lesions with AGO2 ablation undergo oncogene-induced senescence with altered microRNA expression and EGFR/RAS signaling, bypassed by loss of p53. In mouse and human pancreatic tissues, PDAC progression is associated with increased plasma membrane localization of RAS/AGO2. Furthermore, phosphorylation of AGO2Y393 disrupts both the wild-type and oncogenic KRAS-AGO2 interaction, albeit under different conditions. ARS-1620 (G12C-specific inhibitor) disrupts the KRASG12C-AGO2 interaction, suggesting that the interaction is targetable. Altogether, our study supports a biphasic model of pancreatic cancer development: an AGO2-independent early phase of PanIN formation reliant on EGFR-RAS signaling, and an AGO2-dependent phase wherein the mutant KRAS-AGO2 interaction is critical for PDAC progression.
... Finally, the cancer cell lines were utilized to further validate the effects of Raf inhibitor treatment on Ras/Raf binding. For these studies, previously characterized Ras antibodies (Waters et al., 2017) were used to selectively immunoprecipitate the (G) BRET (left) and co-immunoprecipitation (right) assays were performed examining the effect of SB590885 treatment on the interaction of WT or R > L B-Raf FL -Rluc with Venus-H-Ras Q61R . BRET 50 values are listed. ...
The Ras GTPases are frequently mutated in human cancer, and, although the Raf kinases are essential effectors of Ras signaling, the tumorigenic properties of specific Ras-Raf complexes are not well characterized. Here, we examine the ability of individual Ras and Raf proteins to interact in live cells using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) technology. We find that C-Raf binds all mutant Ras proteins with high affinity, whereas B-Raf exhibits a striking preference for mutant K-Ras. This selectivity is mediated by the acidic, N-terminal segment of B-Raf and requires the K-Ras polybasic region for high-affinity binding. In addition, we find that C-Raf is critical for mutant H-Ras-driven signaling and that events stabilizing B-Raf/C-Raf dimerization, such as Raf inhibitor treatment or certain B-Raf mutations, can allow mutant H-Ras to engage B-Raf with increased affinity to promote tumorigenesis, thus revealing a previously unappreciated role for C-Raf in potentiating B-Raf function.
... PDX uveal melanoma metastatic isolates were kindly provided by Dr. John Kirkwood (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA), as previously described [4]. CCUGAGUACUGACCUAAGAdTdT and K-RAS Silencer s7940 [50]. Knock down of K-RAS or N-RAS reduced fluorescent staining by~80% (see Supplementary Figure 12, taken from reference [2]). ...
Prior studies demonstrated that the irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor neratinib caused plasma membrane-associated mutant K-RAS to localize in intracellular vesicles, concomitant with its degradation. Herein, we discovered that neratinib interacted with the chemically distinct irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor afatinib to reduce expression of ERBB1, ERBB2, K-RAS and N-RAS; this was associated with greater-than-additive cell killing of pancreatic tumor cells. Knock down of Beclin1, ATG16L1, Rubicon or cathepsin B significantly lowered the ability of neratinib to reduce ERBB1 and K-RAS expression, and to cause tumor cell death. Knock down of ATM-AMPK suppressed vesicle formation and knock down of cathepsin B-AIF significantly reduced neratinib lethality. PKG phosphorylates K-RAS and HMG CoA reductase inhibitors reduce K-RAS farnesylation both of which remove K-RAS from the plasma membrane, abolishing its activity. Neratinib interacted with the PKG activator sildenafil and the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor atorvastatin to further reduce K-RAS expression, and to further enhance cell killing. Neratinib is also a Ste20 kinase family inhibitor and in carcinoma cells, and hematopoietic cancer cells lacking ERBB1/2/4, it reduced K-RAS expression and the phosphorylation of MST1/3/4/Ezrin by ~ 30%. Neratinib increased LATS1 phosphorylation as well as that of YAP and TAZ also by ~ 30%, caused the majority of YAP to translocate into the cytosol and reduced YAP/TAZ protein levels. Neratinib lethality was enhanced by knock down of YAP. Neratinib, in a Rubicon-dependent fashion, reduced PAK1 phosphorylation and that of its substrate Merlin. Our data demonstrate that neratinib coordinately suppresses both mutant K-RAS and YAP function to kill pancreatic tumor cells.
... The LZTR1-stained speckles further overlapped with the autophagosome marker LC3B fused to mCherry (Fig. S13B), but we failed to detect LZTR1 localization with marker proteins of the Golgi, lysosome, peroxisome or early and late endosome compartments (Fig. S13C). Isoformspecific antibodies that recognize endogenous human RAS isoforms are not available (19). We therefore endogenously tagged KRAS (Fig. S14A), and confirmed specificity of detection in immunofluorescence and immunoblotting by genetic inactivation of the tagged genomic allele (Fig. S14 B to D). KRAS localized to a large number of small-punctate structures, likely membrane-containing small vesicles ( Fig. 3E and Fig. S14D). ...
Regulation of RAS by ubiquitination
The protein LZTR1 is mutated in human cancers and developmental diseases. Work from two groups now converges to implicate the protein in regulating signaling by the small guanosine triphosphatase RAS. Steklov et al. showed that mice haploinsufficient for LZTR1 recapitulated aspects of the human disease Noonan syndrome. Their biochemical studies showed that LZTR1 associated with RAS. LZTR1 appears to function as an adaptor that promotes ubiquitination of RAS, thus inhibiting its signaling functions. Bigenzahn et al. found LZTR1 in a screen for proteins whose absence led to resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors used to treat cancers caused by the BCR-ABL oncogene product. Their biochemical studies and genetic studies in fruitflies also showed that loss of LZTR1 led to increased activity of RAS and signaling through the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway.
Science , this issue p. 1177 , p. 1171
... Direct targeting of RAS Drugging the undruggable Five decades after its discovery, and despite many focused drug development efforts, RAS is still widely considered an undruggable target. A renewed interest in a greater understanding of RAS function and efficient targeting of RAS has emerged in the past few years led by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) RAS Initiative, which was launched in 2013 as a central resource for data on RAS biology, reagents and therapeutics 22,23 . The four RAS proteins are highly homologous (82-90% amino acid identity); most of the initial knowledge of RAS function was based on studies involving HRAS, which was the first activated oncogene isolated from human cancers 11 . ...
RAS genes are the most commonly mutated oncogenes in cancer, but effective therapeutic strategies to target RAS-mutant cancers have proved elusive. A key aspect of this challenge is the fact that direct inhibition of RAS proteins has proved difficult, leading researchers to test numerous alternative strategies aimed at exploiting RAS-related vulnerabilities or targeting RAS effectors. In the past few years, we have witnessed renewed efforts to target RAS directly, with several promising strategies being tested in clinical trials at different stages of completion. Important advances have also been made in approaches designed to indirectly target RAS by improving inhibition of RAS effectors, exploiting synthetic lethal interactions or metabolic dependencies, using therapeutic combination strategies or harnessing the immune system. In this Review, we describe historical and ongoing efforts to target RAS-mutant cancers and outline the current therapeutic landscape in the collective quest to overcome the effects of this crucial oncogene.
... Finally, beyond the cancer context, the differences observed among different Ras isoforms provide additional strong evidence in favor of the notion of functional specificity. It should be noted that the studies regarding the differences between isoforms were limited by the availability of selectively and sensitivity RAS antibodies [79]. Expression, regulation, and function of RAS pathway in human Tregs from patients with MS (particularly RRMS) should be deeply investigated in future researches. ...
RAS signaling is involved in the development of autoimmunity in general. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. It is widely recognized that a reduction of Foxp3+ regulatory T (Treg) cells is an immunological hallmark of MS, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. In experimental autoimmune models, N-Ras and K-Ras inhibition triggers an anti-inflammatory effect up-regulating, via foxp3 elevation, the numbers and the functional suppressive properties of Tregs. Similarly, an increase in natural Tregs number during Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE) in R-RAS -/- mice results in attenuated disease. In humans, only KRAS GTPase isoform is involved in mechanism causing tolerance defects in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). T cells from these patients have increased transcription of KRAS (but not NRAS). RAS genes are major drivers in human cancers. Consequently, there has been considerable interest in developing anti-RAS inhibitors for cancer treatment. Despite efforts, no anti-RAS therapy has succeeded in the clinic. The major strategy that has so far reached the clinic aimed to inhibit activated Ras indirectly through blocking its post-translational modification and inducing its mis-localization. The disappointing clinical outcome of Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitors (FTIs) in cancers has decreased interest in these drugs. However, FTIs suppress EAE by downregulation of myelin-reactive activated T-lymphocytes and statins are currently studied in clinical trials for MS. However, no pharmacologic approaches to targeting Ras proteins directly have yet succeeded. The therapeutic strategy to recover immune function through the restoration of impaired Tregs function with the mounting evidences regarding KRAS in autoimmune mediated disorder (MS, SLE, RA, T1D) suggest as working hypothesis the direct targeting KRAS activation using cancer-derived small molecules may be clinically relevant.
Abbreviations:
FTIs: Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitors; MS: Multiple Sclerosis; RRMS: Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis; PPMS: Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis; Tregs: regulatory T-cells; Foxp3: Forkhead box P3; EAE: Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis; T1D: Type 1 Diabete; SLE: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; RA: Rheumatoid Arthritis; CNS: Central Nervous System; TMEV: Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus; FTS: farnesyl thiosalicylic acid; TCR: T-Cell Receptor; AIA: Adjuvant-induced Arthritis; EAN: experimental autoimmune neuritis; HVR: hypervariable region; HMG-CoA: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase; PBMC: Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.
Purpose
Therapeutic efficacy of KRASG12C(OFF) inhibitors (KRASG12Ci) in KRASG12C-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) varies widely. The activation status of RAS signaling in tumors with KRASG12C mutation remains unclear, as its ability to cycle between the active GTP-bound and inactive GDP-bound states may influence downstream pathway activation and therapeutic responses. We hypothesized that the interaction between RAS and its downstream effector RAF in tumors may serve as indicators of RAS activity, rendering NSCLC tumors with a high degree of RAS engagement and downstream effects more responsive to KRASG12Ci compared with tumors with lower RAS–RAF interactions.
Experimental Design
We developed a method for measuring in situ RAS binding to RAF in cancer samples using proximity ligation assays (PLA) designed to detect panRAS–CRAF interactions.
Results
The panRAS–CRAF PLA signal correlated with levels of both RAS-GTP and phosphorylated ERK protein, suggesting that this assay can effectively assess active RAS signaling. We found that elevated panRAS–CRAF PLA signals were associated with increased sensitivity to KRASG12Ci in KRASG12C-mutant NSCLC cell lines, xenograft models, and patient samples. Applying a similar PLA approach to measure the interactions between EGFR and its adapter protein growth factor receptor–bound protein 2 as a surrogate for EGFR activity, we found no relationship between EGFR activity and response to KRASG12Ci in the same samples.
Conclusions
Our study highlights the importance of evaluating in situ RAS–RAF interactions as a potential predictive biomarker for identifying patients with NSCLC most likely to benefit from KRASG12Ci. The PLA developed for quantifying these interactions represents a valuable tool for guiding treatment strategies.
Despite significant advancements in the treatment of other cancers, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the world’s deadliest cancers. More than 90% of PDAC patients harbor a Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) gene mutation. Although the clinical potential of anti-KRAS therapies has long been realized, all initial efforts to target KRAS were unsuccessful. However, with the recent development of a new generation of KRAS-targeting drugs, multiple KRAS-targeted treatment options for patients with PDAC have entered clinical trials. In this review, we provide an overview of current standard of care treatment, describe RAS signaling and the relevance of KRAS mutations, and discuss RAS isoform- and mutation-specific differences. We also evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of mutation-selective and multi-selective inhibitors, in the context of PDAC. We then provide a comparison of clinically relevant KRAS inhibitors to second-line PDAC treatment options. Finally, we discuss putative resistance mechanisms that may limit the clinical effectiveness of KRAS-targeted therapies and provide a brief overview of promising therapeutic approaches in development that are focused on mitigating these resistance mechanisms.
Recently developed covalent inhibitors for RasG12C provide the first pharmacological tools to target mutant Ras-driven cancers. However, the rapid development of resistance to current clinical Ras G12C inhibitors is common. Presumably, a subpopulation of RasG12C-expressing cells adapt their signaling to evade these inhibitors and the mechanisms for this phenomenon are unclear due to the lack of tools that can measure signaling with single-cell resolution. Here, we utilized recently developed Ras sensors to profile the environment of active Ras and to measure the activity of endogenous Ras in order to pair structure (Ras signalosome) to function (Ras activity), respectively, at a single-cell level. With this approach, we identified a subpopulation of KRasG12C cells treated with RasG12C-GDP inhibitors underwent oncogenic signaling and metabolic changes driven by WT Ras at the golgi and mutant Ras at the mitochondria, respectively. Our Ras sensors identified Major Vault Protein (MVP) as a mediator of Ras activation at both compartments by scaffolding Ras signaling pathway components and metabolite channels. We found that recently developed RasG12C-GTP inhibitors also led to MVP-mediated WT Ras signaling at the golgi, demonstrating that this a general mechanism RasG12C inhibitor resistance. Overall, single-cell analysis of structure-function relationships enabled the discovery of a RasG12C inhibitor-resistant subpopulation driven by MVP, providing insight into the complex and heterogenous rewiring occurring during drug resistance in cancer.
Introduction: KRASG12C and KRASG12D inhibitors represent a major translational breakthrough for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cancer in general by directly targeting its most mutated oncoprotein. However, resistance to these small molecules has highlighted the need for rational combination partners necessitating a critical understanding of signaling downstream of KRAS mutant isoforms.
Methods: We contrasted tumor development between KrasG12C and KrasG12D genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs). To corroborate findings and determine mutant subtype-specific dependencies, isogenic models of KrasG12C and KrasG12D initiation and adaptation were profiled by RNA sequencing. We also employed cell line models of established KRAS mutant NSCLC and determined therapeutic vulnerabilities through pharmacological inhibition. We analysed differences in survival outcomes for patients affected by advanced KRASG12C or KRASG12D-mutant NSCLC.
Results: KRASG12D exhibited higher potency in vivo, manifesting as more rapid lung tumor formation and reduced survival of KRASG12D GEMMs compared to KRASG12C. This increased potency, recapitulated in an isogenic initiation model, was associated with enhanced PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling. However, KRASG12C oncogenicity and downstream pathway activation were comparable with KRASG12D at later stages of tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo, consistent with similar clinical outcomes in patients. Despite this, established KRASG12D NSCLC models depended more on the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, while KRASG12C models on the MAPK pathway. Specifically, KRASG12D inhibition was synergistically enhanced by AKT inhibition.
Conclusions: Our data highlight a unique combination treatment vulnerability and suggest that patient selection strategies for combination approaches using direct KRAS inhibitors should be i) contextualised to individual RAS mutants, and ii) tailored to their downstream signaling.
K-Ras frequently acquires gain-of-function mutations (K-RasG12D being the most common) that trigger significant transcriptomic and proteomic changes to drive tumorigenesis. Nevertheless, oncogenic K-Ras-induced dysregulation of post-transcriptional regulators such as microRNAs (miRNAs) during oncogenesis is poorly understood. Here, we report that K-RasG12D promotes global suppression of miRNA activity, resulting in the upregulation of hundreds of targets. We constructed a comprehensive profile of physiological miRNA targets in mouse colonic epithelium and tumors expressing K-RasG12D using Halo-enhanced Argonaute pull-down. Combining this with parallel datasets of chromatin accessibility, transcriptome, and proteome, we uncovered that K-RasG12D suppressed the expression of Csnk1a1 and Csnk2a1, subsequently decreasing Ago2 phosphorylation at Ser825/829/832/835. Hypo-phosphorylated Ago2 increased binding to mRNAs while reducing its activity to repress miRNA targets. Our findings connect a potent regulatory mechanism of global miRNA activity to K-Ras in a pathophysiological context and provide a mechanistic link between oncogenic K-Ras and the post-transcriptional upregulation of miRNA targets.
The RAS genes are among the most commonly mutated genes in cancer. These genes code for GTPases that act as growth factor receptor-regulated molecular switches. Mutations in RAS lead to a loss in GTP hydrolysis and cause constitutive RAS-GTP signaling, ultimately promoting cellular transformation and oncogenic growth in approximately 30% of human cancers. In pursuit of uncovering protein binding partners in RAS mutant cancers, the Chinnaiyan Lab recently identified Argonaute 2 (AGO2) of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) as part of a novel interaction with KRAS. Despite showing a role for AGO2-KRAS binding in KRAS driven cancer, the precise function of this interaction remained unclear in both normal and cancer biology. In order to assess the role of AGO2 in KRASG12D driven disease, we developed a mouse model of pancreatic cancer with conditional loss of AGO2. While AGO2 knockout did not prevent development of early precursor pancreatic intraepithelial (PanIN) lesions, AGO2 null lesions displayed increased activation of the EGFR-RAS signaling axis and altered microRNA expression during early PanIN development that led to oncogene induced senescence (OIS). This resulted in a dramatic increase in the survival of mice with AGO2 ablation. Upon loss of AGO2 and p53, progression to PDAC was restored and PanIN lesions bypassed the senescence block. Additionally, we found that EGFR-mediated phosphorylation of AGO2Y393 disrupts the interaction between wild-type (WT) and oncogenic KRAS-AGO2 interaction under different conditions. While KRAS is the most commonly mutated isoform in human cancer, we next extended our observations to explore the role of AGO2 interaction with mutant HRAS and NRAS. We confirmed AGO2-HRAS and AGO2-NRAS interaction, and we observed that AGO2 knockdown led to an induction of OIS that was accompanied with changes in the EGFR-RAS signaling axis in mutant HRAS and NRAS cells. The EGFR-RAS-ERK signaling observed was associated with an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS). These high ROS levels inhibited the activity of the phosphatase PTP1B and were associated with increasing pEGFR activation stimulating a feed forward loop resulting in OIS. Finally, knockdown of AGO2 led to an inhibition of mutant RAS driven cell migration and metastasis in a zebrafish xenograft model. We also developed a Single Molecule Toolbox for the use of studying AGO2’s interaction with KRAS and other RISC members. Using an in vitro translation (IVT) system, we over-expressed a given protein, such as AGO2, in a HeLa based cell extract system. We studied the in vitro activity of AGO2 demonstrating a requirement for the presence of RISC members and inhibition by GTP-loaded KRAS. Furthermore, we observed the interaction of AGO2 and KRAS at a single molecule resolution demonstrating their binding at a 1 to 1 stoichiometry. Finally, we observed that IVT generated AGO2 formed higher order clusters in vitro that could be disrupted via RNase treatment. This Single Molecule Toolbox represents a new tool to aid in the study of the biochemistry of AGO2 and its interaction with KRAS. Together, this dissertation describes the role of AGO2-RAS interaction in the development and maintenance of mutant RAS driven cancers, uncovering novel insight into these proteins and their role in both normal physiology and cancer biology.
Ral Guanine Nucleotide Dissociation Stimulator Like 1 (RGL1) is a RAS effector protein that activates Ral GTPase by stimulating nucleotide exchange. Most structures of RAS-effector complexes are for the HRAS isoform; relatively few KRAS-effector structures have been solved, even though KRAS mutations are more frequent in human cancers. We determined crystal structures of KRAS/RGL1-RAS-association (RA) domain complexes and characterized the interaction in solution using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, size-exclusion chromatography combined with multi-angle light scattering and biolayer interferometry. We report structures of wild-type KRAS and the oncogenic G12V mutant in complex with the RA domain of RGL1 at <2 Å resolution. KRASWT/RGL1-RA crystallized as a 1:1 heterodimer, whilst KRASG12V/RGL1-RA crystallized as a heterotetrameric structure in which RGL1-RA dimerized via domain-swapping the C-terminal beta-strand. Solution data indicated that KRASWT and KRASG12V in complex with RGL1-RA both exist predominantly as 1:1 dimers, while tetramerization occurs through very slow association. Through detailed structural analyses, the distance and angle between RAS α1 helix and RBD/RA α1 helix were found to differ significantly among RAS and RBD/RA complexes. The KRAS/RGL1-RA structures possess some of the largest α1RAS/α1Effector distances (21.7-22.2 Å), whereas the corresponding distances in previously reported RAS/RAF complexes are significantly shorter (15.2-17.7 Å). Contact map analysis identified unique structural signatures involving contacts between the β1-β2 loop of RA and the α1 helix of RAS, clearly distinguishing the KRAS/RGL1-RA (and other RAS/RA complexes) from RAS/RBD complexes. These results demonstrate that RAS effectors employ an assortment of finely-tuned docking surfaces to achieve optimal interactions with RAS.
Paving the way for KRAS inhibitors
KRAS is a key oncogene in multiple cancer types, but existing inhibitors target only a mutant form of KRAS containing the G12C mutation, and their function presents a mechanistic conundrum. It is known that KRAS G12C inhibitors bind to the oncoprotein in its inactive form; however, KRAS mutations such as G12C interfere with the action of proteins that normally help it hydrolyze GTP to achieve the inactive state. Li et al . have now identified a protein that enhances GTP hydrolysis by mutant KRAS, helping to explain the clinical activity of current drugs targeting this oncoprotein (see the Perspective by Cox and Der). —YN
RAS proteins are key players in multiple cellular processes. To study the role of RAS proteins individually or in combination, we have developed MEFs that can be rendered RASless, i.e., devoid of all endogenous RAS isoforms. These cells have significantly contributed to our understanding of the requirements for RAS functions in cell proliferation as well as their implications in diverse cellular processes. Here, we describe methods using RASless MEFs to study RAS-dependent cellular activities with special emphasis on proliferation. We provide the details to identify inducers of RAS-independent proliferation in colony assays. We recommend following these stringent guidelines to avoid false-positive results. Moreover, this protocol can be adapted to generate RASless MEFs ectopically expressing RAS variants to interrogate their function in the absence of endogenous RAS isoforms or to perform experiments in the absence of RAS. Finally, we also describe protocols to generate and use RASless MEFs for cell cycle analyses using the FUCCI cell cycle indicator.
RAS is frequently mutated in human cancers with nearly 20% of all cancers harboring mutations in one of three RAS isoforms (KRAS, HRAS, or NRAS). Furthermore, RAS proteins are critical oncogenic drivers of tumorigenesis. As such, RAS has been a prime focus for development of targeted cancer therapeutics. Although RAS is viewed by many as undruggable, the recent development of allele-specific covalent inhibitors to KRAS(G12C) has provided significant hope for the eventual pharmacological inhibition of RAS (Ostrem et al., Nature 503(7477):548–551, 2013; Patricelli et al., Cancer Discov 6(3):316–329, 2016; Janes et al., Cell 172(3):578–589.e17, 2018; Canon et al., Nature 575(7781):217–223, 2019; Hallin et al., Cancer Discov 10(1):54–71, 2020). Indeed, these (G12C)-specific inhibitors have elicited promising responses in early phase clinical trials (Canon et al., Nature 575(7781):217–223, 2019; Hallin et al., Cancer Discov 10(1):54–71, 2020). Despite this success in pharmacologically targeting KRAS(G12C), the remaining RAS mutants lack readily tractable chemistries for development of covalent inhibitors. Thus, alternative approaches are needed to develop broadly efficacious RAS inhibitors. We have utilized Monobody (Mb) technology to identify vulnerabilities in RAS that can potentially be exploited for development of novel RAS inhibitors. Here, we describe the methods used to isolate RAS-specific Mbs and to define their inhibitory activity.
Validation of antibody specificity is essential for the accurate evaluation of protein expression. For antibodies that recognize the gene products of the RAS family of oncogenes (HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS), an important challenge is the determination of selectivity for the four nearly identical HRAS, KRAS4A, KRAS4B, and NRAS proteins. With increasing appreciation for the distinct roles of the different RAS proteins in normal and neoplastic cells, there is a need for well-validated antibodies to evaluate the function and expression of the different RAS isoforms. Here we describe our experimental approaches to characterize RAS antibodies for their isoform- and mutant-specificity for use in immunoblot analyses.
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing has great value for cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment selection. However, the clinical utility of HER2 is frequently tempered by the uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the methods currently available to assess HER2. The development of novel methods for accurate HER2 testing is in great demand. Considering the visualization features of in situ imaging and the quantitative capability of mass spectrometry, integration of the two components into a molecular mapping approach has attracted increasing interest. In this work, we reported an integrated chemical mapping approach using a photocleavable peptide-tagged mass probe for HER2 detection. The probe consists of four functional domains, including the recognition unit of an aptamer to catch HER2, a fluorescent dye moiety (FITC) for fluorescence imaging, a reporter peptide for mass spectrometric quantification, and a photocleavable linker for peptide release. After characterization of this novel probe (e.g., conjugation efficiency, binding affinity and specificity, and photolysis release efficiency), the probe binding and photolysis release conditions were optimized. Then, fluorescence images were collected, and the released reporter peptide after photolysis was quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). A limit of quantification (LOQ) of 25 pM was obtained, which very well meets the requirements for clinical laboratory testing. Finally, the developed assay was applied for HER2 testing in four breast cancer cell lines and 42 pairs of human breast primary tumors and adjacent normal tissue samples. Overall, this integrated approach based on a photocleavable peptide-tagged mass probe can provide chemical mapping including both quantitative and visual information of HER2 reliably and consistently, and may pave the way for clinical applications in a more accurate manner.
A subset of Ras proteins, including N-Ras, depend on a palmitoylation/depalmitoylation cycle to regulate their subcellular trafficking and oncogenicity. General lipase inhibitors such as Palmostatin M block N-Ras depalmitoylation, but lack specificity and target several enzymes displaying depalmitoylase activity. Here, we describe ABD957, a potent and selective covalent inhibitor of the ABHD17 family of depalmitoylases, and show that this compound impairs N-Ras depalmitoylation in human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells. ABD957 produced partial effects on N-Ras palmitoylation compared to Palmostatin M, but was much more selective across the proteome, reflecting a plasma membrane-delineated action on dynamically palmitoylated proteins. Finally, ABD957 impaired N-Ras signaling and the growth of NRAS-mutant AML cells in a manner that synergizes with MEK inhibition. Our findings uncover a surprisingly restricted role for ABHD17 enzymes in modulating the N-Ras palmitoylation cycle and suggest that ABHD17 inhibitors may have value as targeted therapies for NRAS-mutant cancers.
The therapeutic targeting of oncogenic KRAS mutant-harboring (KRASMUT) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an urgent unmet need in cancer therapy. Although NSCLC is often driven by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression and/or mutations, no EGFR-targeted therapy is clinically available for KRASMUT NSCLC. In this study, we show that integrin β3 expression is associated with the intrinsic resistance of KRASMUT NSCLCs to the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab. Further analyses identified an integrin β3-mediated ternary complex comprising NRP1-integrin β3-KRASMUT and its downstream signaling of PI3K-Akt and RalB-TBK1 as a primary resistance mechanism of KRASMUT NSCLC to cetuximab treatment. Importantly, we demonstrate that the EGFR/NRP1 dual-targeting bispecific antibody, Ctx-TPP11, attenuates the downstream signaling driven by the ternary complex via the cellular co-internalization and degradation of the NRP1-coupled complex, resulting in the alleviation of cetuximab resistance in KRASMUT NSCLCs in vitro and in vivo, including patient-derived xenograft mouse models. Our study shows that the dual-targeting of EGFR and NRP1 with a bispecific antibody might be an effective therapeutic strategy for KRASMUT NSCLC.
Autophagy is an evolutionary conserved process that recycles cellular materials in times of nutrient restriction to maintain viability. In cancer therapeutics, the role of autophagy in response to multi-kinase inhibitors, alone or when combined with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors acts, generally, to facilitate the killing of tumor cells. Furthermore, the formation of autophagosomes and subsequent degradation of their contents can reduce the expression of HDAC proteins themselves as well as of other signaling regulatory molecules such as protein chaperones and mutated RAS proteins. Reduced levels of HDAC6 causes the acetylation and inactivation of heat shock protein 90, and, together with reduced expression of the chaperones HSP70 and GRP78, generates a strong endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response. Prolonged intense ER stress signaling causes tumor cell death. Reduced expression of HDACs 1, 2 and 3 causes the levels of programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) to decline and the expression of Class I MHCA to increase which correlates with elevated immunogenicity of the tumor cells in vivo. This review will specifically focus on the downstream implications that result from autophagic-degradation of HDACs, RAS and protein chaperones.
At the root of the so-called precision medicine or precision oncology, which is our focus here, is the hypothesis that cancer treatment would be considerably better if therapies were guided by a tumor’s genomic alterations. This hypothesis has sparked major initiatives focusing on whole-genome and/or exome sequencing, creation of large databases, and developing tools for their statistical analyses—all aspiring to identify actionable alterations, and thus molecular targets, in a patient. At the center of the massive amount of collected sequence data is their interpretations that largely rest on statistical analysis and phenotypic observations. Statistics is vital, because it guides identification of cancer-driving alterations. However, statistics of mutations do not identify a change in protein conformation; therefore, it may not define sufficiently accurate actionable mutations, neglecting those that are rare. Among the many thematic overviews of precision oncology, this review innovates by further comprehensively including precision pharmacology, and within this framework, articulating its protein structural landscape and consequences to cellular signaling pathways. It provides the underlying physicochemical basis, thereby also opening the door to a broader community.
Many biological events such as mutations or aberrant post-translational modifications can alter protein conformation and/or folding stability and their subsequent biological function, which may trigger the onset of diseases like cancer. Evaluating protein folding is hence crucial for the diagnosis of these diseases. Yet, it is still challenging to detect changes in protein folding, especially if they are subtle, in a simple and highly sensitive manner with the current assays. Herein, we report a new colloidal-based interfacial biosensing approach for qualitative and quantitative profiling of various types of changes in protein folding, from denaturation to variant conformations in native proteins, such as protein activation by underlying mutations or phosphorylation. The approach is based on the direct interfacial interaction of proteins freely available in solution with added tannic acid-capped gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), enabling interrogating protein’s folding in their solubilized form. We found that under the optimized conditions, proteins can modulate the solvation of the colloids according to their folding or conformational status, which can be visualized in a single step, by the naked eye, with minimal protein input requirements (LOD of 1 ng/µL). Protein folding detection was achieved regardless of protein topology and size without using conformation-specific antibodies or mutational analysis, which are the most common assays for sensing malfunctioning proteins. The approach showed excellent sensitivity, superior to Circular Dichroism, for the detection of the very subtle conformational changes in EGFR and ERK proteins induced by activating mutations and phosphorylation, enabling their detection even in complex samples derived from lung cancer cells, which contained up to 95% excess of their wild-type forms. Broader clinical translation was showed via monitoring the action of conformation restoring drugs, such as Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on EGFR conformation and its downstream protein network, using ERK protein as a surrogate.
It is a well-known phenomenon that cancer cells release key biological information, such as DNA, RNA or proteins to body fluids (e.g., blood, urine or saliva). The analysis of these...
Genetic studies in mice have provided evidence that H-Ras and K-Ras proteins are bioequivalent. However, human tumors display marked differences in the association of RAS oncogenes with tumor type. Thus, to further assess the bioequivalency of oncogenic H-Ras and K-Ras, we replaced the coding region of the murine K-Ras locus with H-RasG12V oncogene sequences. Germline expression of H-RasG12V or K-RasG12V from the K-Ras locus resulted in embryonic lethality. However, expression of these genes in adult mice led to different tumor phenotypes. Whereas H-RasG12V elicited papillomas and hematopoietic tumors, K-RasG12V induced lung tumors and gastric lesions. Pulmonary expression of H-RasG12V created a senescence-like state caused by excessive MAP kinase signaling. Likewise, H-RasG12V but not K-RasG12V induced senescence in mouse embryo fibroblasts. Label-free quantitative analysis revealed that minor differences in H-RasG12V expression levels led to drastically different biological outputs, suggesting that subtle differences in MAP kinase signaling confer non-equivalent functions that influence tumor spectra induced by RAS oncoproteins.
Synonymous mutations in the KRAS gene are clustered at G12, G13, and G60 in human cancers. We constructed 9 stable NIH3T3 cell lines expressing KRAS, each with one of these synonymous mutations. Compared to the negative control cell line expressing the wild type human KRAS gene, all the synonymous mutant lines expressed more KRAS protein, grew more rapidly and to higher densities, and were more invasive in multiple assays. Three of the cell lines showed dramatic loss of contact inhibition, were more refractile under phase contrast, and their refractility was greatly reduced by treatment with trametinib. Codon usage at these glycines is highly conserved in KRAS compared to HRAS, indicating selective pressure. These transformed phenotypes suggest that synonymous mutations found in driver genes such as KRAS may play a role in human cancers.
Ras guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) regulate signaling pathways only when associated with cellular membranes through their C-terminal prenylated regions. Ras proteins move between membrane compartments in part via diffusion-limited, fluid phase transfer through the cytosol, suggesting that chaperones sequester the polyisoprene lipid from the aqueous environment. In this study, we analyze the nature of the pool of endogenous Ras proteins found in the cytosol. The majority of the pool consists of farnesylated, but not palmitoylated, N-Ras that is associated with a high molecular weight (HMW) complex. Affinity purification and mass spectrographic identification revealed that among the proteins found in the HMW fraction is VPS35, a latent cytosolic component of the retromer coat. VPS35 bound to N-Ras in a farnesyl-dependent, but neither palmitoyl- nor guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-dependent, fashion. Silencing VPS35 increased N-Ras's association with cytoplasmic vesicles, diminished GTP loading of Ras, and inhibited mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and growth of N-Ras-dependent melanoma cells.
RAS proteins (KRAS4A, KRAS4B, NRAS and HRAS) function as GDP-GTP-regulated binary on-off switches, which regulate cytoplasmic signaling networks that control diverse normal cellular processes. Gain-of-function missense mutations in RAS genes are found in ∼25% of human cancers, prompting interest in identifying anti-RAS therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment. However, despite more than three decades of intense effort, no anti-RAS therapies have reached clinical application. Contributing to this failure has been an underestimation of the complexities of RAS. First, there is now appreciation that the four human RAS proteins are not functionally identical. Second, with >130 different missense mutations found in cancer, there is an emerging view that there are mutation-specific consequences on RAS structure, biochemistry and biology, and mutation-selective therapeutic strategies are needed. In this Cell Science at a Glance article and accompanying poster, we provide a snapshot of the differences between RAS isoforms and mutations, as well as the current status of anti-RAS drug-discovery efforts.
Prenylated proteins play key roles in several human diseases including cancer, atherosclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. KRAS4b, which is frequently mutated in pancreatic, colon and lung cancers, is processed by farnesylation, proteolytic cleavage and carboxymethylation at the C-terminus. Plasma membrane localization of KRAS4b requires this processing as does KRAS4b-dependent RAF kinase activation. Previous attempts to produce modified KRAS have relied on protein engineering approaches or in vitro farnesylation of bacterially expressed KRAS protein. The proteins produced by these methods do not accurately replicate the mature KRAS protein found in mammalian cells and the protein yield is typically low. We describe a protocol that yields 5-10 mg/L highly purified, farnesylated, and methylated KRAS4b from insect cells. Farnesylated and methylated KRAS4b is fully active in hydrolyzing GTP, binds RAF-RBD on lipid Nanodiscs and interacts with the known farnesyl-binding protein PDEδ.
KRAS mutations are the most common genetic abnormalities in cancer but the distribution of specific mutations across cancers and the differential responses of patients with specific KRAS mutations in therapeutic clinical trials suggest that different KRAS mutations have unique biochemical behaviors. To further explain these high-level clinical differences and to explore potential therapeutic strategies for specific KRAS isoforms, we characterized the most common KRAS mutants biochemically for substrate binding kinetics, intrinsic and GTPase-activating protein (GAP) stimulated GTPase activities and interactions with the RAS effector, RAF kinase. Of note, KRAS G13D shows rapid nucleotide exchange kinetics compared to other mutants analyzed. This property can be explained by changes in the electrostatic charge distribution of the active site induced by the G13D mutation as shown by x-ray crystallography. High resolution x-ray structures are also provided for the GDP bound forms of KRAS G12V, G12R and Q61L and reveal additional insight. Overall, the structural data and measurements, obtained herein, indicate that measurable biochemical properties provide clues for identifying KRAS-driven tumors that preferentially signal through RAF.
Biochemical profiling and subclassification of KRAS-driven cancers will enable the rational selection of therapies targeting specific KRAS isoforms or specific RAS effectors.
Copyright © 2015, American Association for Cancer Research.
To save millions of dollars and dramatically improve reproducibility, protein-binding reagents must be defined by their sequences and produced as recombinant proteins, say Andrew Bradbury, Andreas Plückthun and 110 co-signatories.
Significance
The KRAS oncogene is mutated more frequently in human cancer than any other. The KRAS transcript is alternatively spliced to give rise to two products, K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B, both of which are oncogenic when KRAS is mutated. We detected significant amounts of each transcript in human tumor cells and colorectal carcinomas. We found that K-Ras4A is targeted to the plasma membrane by dual targeting motifs distinct from those of K-Ras4B. Because interfering with membrane association of Ras proteins remains one of the most attractive approaches to anti-Ras therapy, efforts in this direction will have to disrupt both the K-Ras4A and the K-Ras4B membrane-targeting pathways.
Despite more than three decades of intensive effort, no effective pharmacological inhibitors of the RAS oncoproteins have reached the clinic, prompting the widely held perception that RAS proteins are 'undruggable'. However, recent data from the laboratory and the clinic have renewed our hope for the development of RAS-inhibitory molecules. In this Review, we summarize the progress and the promise of five key approaches. Firstly, we focus on the prospects of using direct inhibitors of RAS. Secondly, we address the issue of whether blocking RAS membrane association is a viable approach. Thirdly, we assess the status of targeting RAS downstream effector signalling, which is arguably the most favourable current approach. Fourthly, we address whether the search for synthetic lethal interactors of mutant RAS still holds promise. Finally, RAS-mediated changes in cell metabolism have recently been described and we discuss whether these changes could be exploited for new therapeutic directions. We conclude with perspectives on how additional complexities, which are not yet fully understood, may affect each of these approaches.
Defects in the RAS small G protein or its associated network of regulatory proteins that disrupt GTPase cycling are a major cause of cancer and developmental RASopathy disorders. Lack of robust functional assays has been a major hurdle in RAS pathway-targeted drug development. We used NMR to obtain detailed mechanistic data on RAS cycling defects conferred by oncogenic mutations, or full-length RASopathy-derived regulatory proteins. By monitoring the conformation of wild-type and oncogenic RAS in real-time, we show that opposing properties integrate with regulators to hyperactivate oncogenic RAS mutants. Q61L and G13D exhibited rapid nucleotide exchange and an unexpected susceptibility to GAP-mediated hydrolysis, in direct contrast with G12V, indicating different approaches must be taken to inhibit these oncoproteins. An NMR methodology was established to directly monitor RAS cycling by intact, multidomain proteins encoded by RASopathy genes in mammalian cell extracts. By measuring GAP activity from tumor cells, we demonstrate how loss of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) increases RAS-GTP levels in NF1-derived cells. We further applied this methodology to profile Noonan Syndrome (NS)-derived SOS1 mutants. Combining NMR with cell-based assays allowed us to differentiate defects in catalysis, allosteric regulation, and membrane targeting of individual mutants, while revealing a membrane-dependent compensatory effect that attenuates dramatic increases in RAS activation shown by Y337C, L550P, and I252T. Our NMR method presents a precise and robust measure of RAS activity, providing mechanistic insights that facilitate discovery of therapeutics targeted against the RAS signaling network.
All mammalian cells express 3 closely related Ras proteins, termed H-Ras, K-Ras, and N-Ras, that promote oncogenesis when they are mutationally activated at codon 12, 13, or 61. Although there is a high degree of similarity among the isoforms, K-Ras mutations are far more frequently observed in cancer, and each isoform displays preferential coupling to particular cancer types. We examined the mutational spectra of Ras isoforms curated from large-scale tumor profiling and found that each isoform exhibits surprisingly distinctive codon mutation and amino-acid substitution biases. These findings were unexpected given that these mutations occur in regions that share 100% amino-acid sequence identity among the 3 isoforms. Of importance, many of these mutational biases were not due to differences in exposure to mutagens, because the patterns were still evident when compared within specific cancer types. We discuss potential genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, as well as isoform-specific differences in protein structure and signaling, that may promote these distinct mutation patterns and differential coupling to specific cancers.
C. Glenn Begley and Lee M. Ellis propose how methods, publications and
incentives must change if patients are to benefit.
H-ras, N-ras, and K-ras are canonical ras gene family members frequently activated by point mutation in human cancers and coding for 4 different, highly related protein isoforms (H-Ras, N-Ras, K-Ras4A, and K-Ras4B). Their expression is nearly ubiquitous and broadly conserved across eukaryotic species, although there are quantitative and qualitative differences of expression depending on the tissue and/or developmental stage under consideration. Extensive functional studies have determined during the last quarter century that these Ras gene products are critical components of signaling pathways that control eukaryotic cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation. However, because of their homology and frequent coexpression in various cellular contexts, it remained unclear whether the different Ras proteins play specific or overlapping functional roles in physiological and pathological processes. Initially, their high degree of sequence homology and the observation that all Ras isoforms share common sets of downstream effectors and upstream activators suggested that they were mostly redundant functionally. In contrast, the notion of functional specificity for each of the different Ras isoforms is supported at present by an increasing body of experimental observations, including 1) the fact that different ras isoforms are preferentially mutated in specific types of tumors or developmental disorders; 2) the different transforming potential of transfected ras genes in different cell contexts; 3) the distinct sensitivities exhibited by the various Ras family members for modulation by different GAPs or GEFs; 4) the demonstration that different Ras isoforms follow distinct intracellular processing pathways and localize to different membrane microdomains or subcellular compartments; 5) the different phenotypes displayed by genetically modified animal strains for each of the 3 ras loci; and 6) the specific transcriptional networks controlled by each isoform in different cellular settings.
Antibodies are among the most frequently used tools in basic science research and in clinical assays, but there are no universally accepted guidelines or standardized methods for determining the validity of these reagents. Furthermore, for commercially available antibodies, it is clear that what is on the label does not necessarily correspond to what is in the tube. To validate an antibody, it must be shown to be specific, selective, and reproducible in the context for which it is to be used. In this review, we highlight the common pitfalls when working with antibodies, common practices for validating antibodies, and levels of commercial antibody validation for seven vendors. Finally, we share our algorithm for antibody validation for immunohistochemistry and quantitative immunofluorescence.
We have used mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) devoid of Ras proteins to illustrate that they are essential for proliferation and migration, but not for survival, at least in these cells. These properties are unique to the Ras subfamily of proteins because ectopic expression of other Ras-like small GTPases, even when constitutively active, could not compensate for the absence of Ras proteins. Only constitutive activation of components of the Raf/Mek/Erk pathway was sufficient to sustain normal proliferation and migration of MEFs devoid of Ras proteins. Activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/PTEN/Akt and Ral guanine exchange factor (RalGEF)/Ral pathways, either alone or in combination, failed to induce proliferation or migration of Rasless cells, although they cooperated with Raf/Mek/Erk signalling to reproduce the full response mediated by Ras signalling. In contrast to current hypotheses, Ras signalling did not induce proliferation by inducing expression of D-type Cyclins. Rasless MEFs had normal levels of Cyclin D1/Cdk4 and Cyclin E/Cdk2. However, these complexes were inactive. Inactivation of the pocket proteins or knock down of pRb relieved MEFs from their dependence on Ras signalling to proliferate.
As a result of the questionable risk-to-benefit ratio of adjuvant therapies, stage II melanoma is currently managed by observation because available clinicopathologic parameters cannot identify the 20% to 60% of such patients likely to develop metastatic disease. Here, we propose a multimarker molecular prognostic assay that can help triage patients at increased risk of recurrence.
Protein expression for 38 candidates relevant to melanoma oncogenesis was evaluated using the automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) method for immunofluorescence-based immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from a cohort of 192 primary melanomas collected during 1959 to 1994. The prognostic assay was built using a genetic algorithm and validated on an independent cohort of 246 serial primary melanomas collected from 1997 to 2004.
Multiple iterations of the genetic algorithm yielded a consistent five-marker solution. A favorable prognosis was predicted by ATF2 ln(non-nuclear/nuclear AQUA score ratio) of more than -0.052, p21(WAF1) nuclear compartment AQUA score of more than 12.98, p16(INK4A) ln(non-nuclear/nuclear AQUA score ratio) of < or = -0.083, beta-catenin total AQUA score of more than 38.68, and fibronectin total AQUA score of < or = 57.93. Primary tumors that met at least four of these five conditions were considered a low-risk group, and those that met three or fewer conditions formed a high-risk group (log-rank P < .0001). Multivariable proportional hazards analysis adjusting for clinicopathologic parameters shows that the high-risk group has significantly reduced survival on both the discovery (hazard ratio = 2.84; 95% CI, 1.46 to 5.49; P = .002) and validation (hazard ratio = 2.72; 95% CI, 1.12 to 6.58; P = .027) cohorts.
This multimarker prognostic assay, an independent determinant of melanoma survival, might be beneficial in improving the selection of stage II patients for adjuvant therapy.
K-ras mutations occur frequently in epithelial cancers. Using short hairpin RNAs to deplete K-Ras in lung and pancreatic cancer cell lines harboring K-ras mutations, two classes were identified-lines that do or do not require K-Ras to maintain viability. Comparing these two classes of cancer cells revealed a gene expression signature in K-Ras-dependent cells, associated with a well-differentiated epithelial phenotype, which was also seen in primary tumors. Several of these genes encode pharmacologically tractable proteins, such as Syk and Ron kinases and integrin beta6, depletion of which induces epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) and apoptosis specifically in K-Ras-dependent cells. These findings indicate that epithelial differentiation and tumor cell viability are associated, and that EMT regulators in "K-Ras-addicted" cancers represent candidate therapeutic targets.
An attractive path forward in proteomics is to experimentally annotate the human protein complement of the genome in a genecentric manner. Using antibodies, it might be possible to design protein-specific probes for a representative protein from every protein-coding gene and to subsequently use the antibodies for systematical analysis of cellular distribution and subcellular localization of proteins in normal and disease tissues. A new version (4.0) of the Human Protein Atlas has been developed in a genecentric manner with the inclusion of all human genes and splice variants predicted from genome efforts together with a visualization of each protein with characteristics such as predicted membrane regions, signal peptide, and protein domains and new plots showing the uniqueness (sequence similarity) of every fraction of each protein toward all other human proteins. The new version is based on tissue profiles generated from 6120 antibodies with more than five million immunohistochemistry-based images covering 5067 human genes, corresponding to approximately 25% of the human genome. Version 4.0 includes a putative list of members in various protein classes, both functional classes, such as kinases, transcription factors, G-protein-coupled receptors, etc., and project-related classes, such as candidate genes for cancer or cardiovascular diseases. The exact antigen sequence for the internally generated antibodies has also been released together with a visualization of the application-specific validation performed for each antibody, including a protein array assay, Western blot analysis, immunohistochemistry, and, for a large fraction, immunofluorescence-based confocal microscopy. New search functionalities have been added to allow complex queries regarding protein expression profiles, protein classes, and chromosome location. The new version of the protein atlas thus is a resource for many areas of biomedical research, including protein science and biomarker discovery.
We show that Nras is transiently localized in the Golgi prior to the plasma membrane (PM). Moreover, green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged Nras illuminated motile, peri-Golgi vesicles, and prolonged BFA treatment blocked PM expression. GFP-Hras colocalized with GFP-Nras, but GFP-Kras4B revealed less Golgi and no vesicular fluorescence. Whereas a secondary membrane targeting signal was required for PM expression, the CAAX motif alone was necessary and sufficient to target proteins to the endomembrane where they were methylated, a modification required for efficient membrane association. Thus, prenylated CAAX proteins do not associate directly with the PM but instead associate with the endomembrane and are subsequently transported to the PM, a process that requires a secondary targeting motif.
The three RAS oncogenes make up the most frequently mutated gene family in human cancer. The well-validated role of mutationally activated RAS genes in driving cancer development and growth has stimulated comprehensive efforts to develop therapeutic strategies to block mutant RAS function for cancer treatment. Disappointingly, despite more than three decades of research effort, clinically effective anti-RAS therapies have remained elusive, prompting a perception that RAS may be undruggable. However, with a greater appreciation of the complexities of RAS that thwarted past efforts, and armed with new technologies and directions, the field is experiencing renewed excitement that mutant RAS may finally be conquered. Here we summarize where these efforts stand.
Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2017, 1,688,780 new cancer cases and 600,920 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. For all sites combined, the cancer incidence rate is 20% higher in men than in women, while the cancer death rate is 40% higher. However, sex disparities vary by cancer type. For example, thyroid cancer incidence rates are 3-fold higher in women than in men (21 vs 7 per 100,000 population), despite equivalent death rates (0.5 per 100,000 population), largely reflecting sex differences in the "epidemic of diagnosis." Over the past decade of available data, the overall cancer incidence rate (2004-2013) was stable in women and declined by approximately 2% annually in men, while the cancer death rate (2005-2014) declined by about 1.5% annually in both men and women. From 1991 to 2014, the overall cancer death rate dropped 25%, translating to approximately 2,143,200 fewer cancer deaths than would have been expected if death rates had remained at their peak. Although the cancer death rate was 15% higher in blacks than in whites in 2014, increasing access to care as a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may expedite the narrowing racial gap; from 2010 to 2015, the proportion of blacks who were uninsured halved, from 21% to 11%, as it did for Hispanics (31% to 16%). Gains in coverage for traditionally underserved Americans will facilitate the broader application of existing cancer control knowledge across every segment of the population. CA Cancer J Clin 2017. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Significance
Despite the significant progress made in the last few years toward targeting phosphodiesterase-δ (PDEδ) for KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma isoform)-driven cancers, there is no structural information available on posttranslationally modified KRAS4b in complex with PDEδ. The KRAS4b–PDEδ structure reported here provides the structural details of the protein–protein interaction interface and the atomic details of the hypervariable region of KRAS4b. Structural comparison of the two crystal forms allowed identification of a 5-aa-long sequence motif in KRAS4b that could allow PDEδ to bind to both farnesylated and geranylgeranylated KRAS4b. Structural insights obtained from this study could be used to guide the development of improved and more specific inhibitors of the KRAS4b–PDEδ complex.
RAS mutations are among the most common genetic alterations found in cancerous tumors but rational criteria or strategies for targeting RAS-dependent tumors are only recently emerging. Clinical and laboratory data suggest that patient selection based on specific RAS mutations will be an essential component of these strategies. A thorough understanding of the biochemical and structural properties of mutant RAS proteins form the theoretical basis for these approaches. Direct inhibition of KRAS G12C by covalent inhibitors is a notable recent example of the RAS mutation-tailored approach that establishes a paradigm for other RAS mutation-centered strategies.
We convened an ad hoc International Working Group for Antibody Validation in order to formulate the best approaches for validating antibodies used in common research applications and to provide guidelines that ensure antibody reproducibility. We recommend five conceptual 'pillars' for antibody validation to be used in an application-specific manner.
Induction of compensatory mechanisms and ERK reactivation has limited the effectiveness of Raf and MEK inhibitors in RAS-mutant cancers. We determined that direct pharmacologic inhibition of ERK suppressed the growth of a subset of KRAS-mutant pancreatic cancer cell lines and that concurrent phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibition caused synergistic cell death. Additional combinations that enhanced ERK inhibitor action were also identified. Unexpectedly, long-term treatment of sensitive cell lines caused senescence, mediated in part by MYC degradation and p16 reactivation. Enhanced basal PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling was associated with de novo resistance to ERK inhibitor, as were other protein kinases identified by kinome-wide siRNA screening and a genetic gain-of-function screen. Our findings reveal distinct consequences of inhibiting this kinase cascade at the level of ERK.
Antibodies are the workhorses of biological experiments, but they are littering the field with false findings. A few evangelists are pushing for change.
Thirty years of pursuit have failed to yield a drug to take on one of the deadliest families of cancer-causing proteins.
Unlabelled:
NRAS mutation at codons 12, 13, or 61 is associated with transformation; yet, in melanoma, such alterations are nearly exclusive to codon 61. Here, we compared the melanoma susceptibility of an NrasQ61R knock-in allele to similarly designed KrasG12D and NrasG12D alleles. With concomitant p16INK4a inactivation, KrasG12D or NrasQ61R expression efficiently promoted melanoma in vivo, whereas NrasG12D did not. In addition, NrasQ61R mutation potently cooperated with Lkb1/Stk11 loss to induce highly metastatic disease. Functional comparisons of NrasQ61R and NrasG12D revealed little difference in the ability of these proteins to engage PI3K or RAF. Instead, NrasQ61R showed enhanced nucleotide binding, decreased intrinsic GTPase activity, and increased stability when compared with NrasG12D. This work identifies a faithful model of human NRAS-mutant melanoma, and suggests that the increased melanomagenecity of NrasQ61R over NrasG12D is due to heightened abundance of the active, GTP-bound form rather than differences in the engagement of downstream effector pathways.
Significance:
This work explains the curious predominance in human melanoma of mutations of codon 61 of NRAS over other oncogenic NRAS mutations. Using conditional "knock-in" mouse models, we show that physiologic expression of NRASQ61R, but not NRASG12D, drives melanoma formation.
Ras proteins play a major role in human cancers but have not yielded to therapeutic attack. Ras-driven cancers are among the most difficult to treat and often excluded from therapies. The Ras proteins have been termed "undruggable," based on failures from an era in which understanding of signaling transduction, feedback loops, redundancy, tumor heterogeneity, and Ras' oncogenic role was poor. Structures of Ras oncoproteins bound to their effectors or regulators are unsolved, and it is unknown precisely how Ras proteins activate their downstream targets. These knowledge gaps have impaired development of therapeutic strategies. A better understanding of Ras biology and biochemistry, coupled with new ways of targeting undruggable proteins, is likely to lead to new ways of defeating Ras-driven cancers.
Oncogenic KRAS mutation is the signature genetic event in the progression and growth of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), an almost universally fatal disease. Although it has been appreciated for some time that nearly 95% of PDAC harbor mutationally activated KRAS, to date no effective treatments that target this mutant protein have reached the clinic. A number of studies have shown that oncogenic KRAS plays a central role in controlling tumor metabolism by orchestrating multiple metabolic changes including stimulation of glucose uptake, differential channeling of glucose intermediates, reprogrammed glutamine metabolism, increased autophagy, and macropinocytosis. We review these recent findings and address how they may be applied to develop new PDAC treatments.
The immense majority of genes are alternatively spliced and there are many isoforms specifically associated with cancer progression and metastasis. The splicing pattern of specific isoforms of numerous genes is altered as cells move through the oncogenic process of gaining proliferative capacity, acquiring angiogenic, invasive, antiapoptotic and survival properties, becoming free from growth factor dependence and growth suppression, altering their metabolism to cope with hypoxia, enabling them to acquire mechanisms of immune escape, and as they move through the epithelial-mesenchymal and mesenchymal-epithelial transitions and metastasis. Each of the 'hallmarks of cancer' is associated with a switch in splicing, towards a more aggressive invasive cancer phenotype. The choice of isoforms is regulated by several factors (signaling molecules, kinases, splicing factors) currently being identified systematically by a number of high-throughput, independent and unbiased methodologies. Splicing factors are de-regulated in cancer, and in some cases are themselves oncogenes or pseudo-oncogenes and can contribute to positive feedback loops driving cancer progression. Tumour progression may therefore be associated with a coordinated splicing control, meaning that there is the potential for a relatively small number of splice factors or their regulators to drive multiple oncogenic processes. The understanding of how splicing contributes to the various phenotypic traits acquired by tumours as they progress and metastasise, and in particular how alternative splicing is coordinated, can and is leading to the development of a new class of anticancer therapeutics-the alternative-splicing inhibitors.Oncogene advance online publication, 16 December 2013; doi:10.1038/onc.2013.533.
We report the synthesis of a GDP analogue, SML-8-73-1, and a prodrug derivative, SML-10-70-1, which are selective, direct-acting covalent inhibitors of the K-Ras G12C mutant relative to wild-type Ras. Biochemical and biophysical measurements suggest that modification of K-Ras with SML-8-73-1 renders the protein in an inactive state. These first-in-class covalent K-Ras inhibitors demonstrate that irreversible targeting of the K-Ras guanine-nucleotide binding site is potentially a viable therapeutic strategy for inhibition of Ras signaling.
Somatic mutations in the small GTPase K-Ras are the most common activating lesions found in human cancer, and are generally associated with poor response to standard therapies. Efforts to target this oncogene directly have faced difficulties owing to its picomolar affinity for GTP/GDP and the absence of known allosteric regulatory sites. Oncogenic mutations result in functional activation of Ras family proteins by impairing GTP hydrolysis. With diminished regulation by GTPase activity, the nucleotide state of Ras becomes more dependent on relative nucleotide affinity and concentration. This gives GTP an advantage over GDP and increases the proportion of active GTP-bound Ras. Here we report the development of small molecules that irreversibly bind to a common oncogenic mutant, K-Ras(G12C). These compounds rely on the mutant cysteine for binding and therefore do not affect the wild-type protein. Crystallographic studies reveal the formation of a new pocket that is not apparent in previous structures of Ras, beneath the effector binding switch-II region. Binding of these inhibitors to K-Ras(G12C) disrupts both switch-I and switch-II, subverting the native nucleotide preference to favour GDP over GTP and impairing binding to Raf. Our data provide structure-based validation of a new allosteric regulatory site on Ras that is targetable in a mutant-specific manner.
The transforming protein of Kirsten murine sarcoma virus (Ki-MuSV) is a virally encoded 21-kilodalton protein called p21 kis. The sequences encoding p21 kis were genetically localized to a 1.3-kilobase segment near the 5' end of the viral genome by assaying the capacity of a series of defined deletion mutants of molecularly cloned Ki-MuSV DNA to induce focal transformation of mouse cells. Nucleotide sequencing of a portion of this region has led to the identification of an open reading frame of 567 nucleotides coding for p21 kis protein.
Kirsten (Ki)-ras cDNA clones were prepared from human lung and colon carcinoma cell lines expressing an activated c-Ki-ras2 gene. DNA sequence analysis and transfection studies indicate that different point mutations at the same codon can activate the gene; that most human c-Ki-ras2 mRNA uses sequences from a fourth coding exon distinct from that of its viral counterpart; and that at least one cell line is functionally homozygous for the activated gene.
Members of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases (p21) are involved in the regulation of a large variety of key cellular processes, including
cell differentiation and proliferation, membrane trafficking, and nuclear import and export. Based on sequence homology, this
superfamily can be divided into the Ras, Rho, Ran, Arf, Rab, and Rad subfamilies, which all have distinct biological activities.
All members of this superfamily act as molecular switches and become activated and capable of transducing a signal upon binding
to GTP, while guanosine triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis returns them to the inactive state. Most members of this superfamily
are post-translationally modified and carry isoprenoids at their C-termini, which anchors them to the membrane.
The tumor oncoproteins HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS are the founding members of a larger family of at least 35 related human proteins. Using a somewhat broader definition of sequence similarity reveals a more extended superfamily of more than 170 RAS-related proteins. The RAS superfamily of GTP (guanosine triphosphate) hydrolysis-coupled signal transduction relay proteins can be subclassified into RAS, RHO, RAB, and ARF families, as well as the closely related Galpha family. The members of each family can, in turn, be arranged into evolutionarily conserved branches. These groupings reflect structural, biochemical, and functional conservation. Recent findings have provided insights into the signaling characteristics of representative members of most RAS superfamily branches. The analysis presented here may serve as a guide for predicting the function of numerous uncharacterized superfamily members. Also described are guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) distinct from members of the RAS superfamily. These related proteins employ GTP binding and GTPase domains in diverse structural contexts, expanding the scope of their function in humans.
Kras is commonly mutated in colon cancers, but mutations in Nras are rare. We have used genetically engineered mice to determine whether and how these related oncogenes regulate homeostasis and tumorigenesis in the colon. Expression of K-Ras(G12D) in the colonic epithelium stimulated hyperproliferation in a Mek-dependent manner. N-Ras(G12D) did not alter the growth properties of the epithelium, but was able to confer resistance to apoptosis. In the context of an Apc-mutant colonic tumor, activation of K-Ras led to defects in terminal differentiation and expansion of putative stem cells within the tumor epithelium. This K-Ras tumor phenotype was associated with attenuated signaling through the MAPK pathway, and human colon cancer cells expressing mutant K-Ras were hypersensitive to inhibition of Raf, but not Mek. These studies demonstrate clear phenotypic differences between mutant Kras and Nras, and suggest that the oncogenic phenotype of mutant K-Ras might be mediated by noncanonical signaling through Ras effector pathways.
- L Berglund
- E Björling
- P Oksvold
- L Fagerberg
- A Asplund
- C A Szigyarto
- A Persson
- J Ottosson
- H Wernérus
- P Nilsson
- E Lundberg
- Å Sivertsson
- S Navani
- K Wester
- C Kampf
- S Hober
- F Pontén
- M Uhlén
L. Berglund, E. Björling, P. Oksvold, L. Fagerberg, A. Asplund, C. A.-K. Szigyarto, A. Persson,
J. Ottosson, H. Wernérus, P. Nilsson, E. Lundberg, Å. Sivertsson, S. Navani, K. Wester,
C. Kampf, S. Hober, F. Pontén, M. Uhlén, A genecentric Human Protein Atlas for
expression profiles based on antibodies. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 2019-2027 (2008).
- R L Siegel
- K D Miller
R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, A. Jemal, Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J. Clin. 67, 7-30 (2017).
- J Bordeaux
- A W Welsh
- S Agarwal
- E Killiam
- M T Baquero
- J A Hanna
- V K Anagnostou
- D L Rimm
J. Bordeaux, A. W. Welsh, S. Agarwal, E. Killiam, M. T. Baquero, J. A. Hanna,
V. K. Anagnostou, D. L. Rimm, Antibody validation. Biotechniques 48, 197-209 (2010).