ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Due to lack of a membrane and completely anoxic, sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) are different from microbial fuel cells. The simultaneous production of renewable energy, bioremediation of contaminants and moderate functioning parameters, SMFCs have attracted the attention of many researchers. For power generation, many exoelectrogens in SMFCs have the ability to transfer electrons from electrodes by using four ways of natural electron shuttles. The most dominant mechanism is long-range electron transfer via conductive pili. The powering by microbes is an emerging technique for the remediation of contaminants from sediments. The pathways for transferring electrons in electrotrophs operate in the opposite direction from those in exoelectrogens.This review briefly targets on the SMFC prototype, power generation and contaminants remediation.
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology, ISSN: 2321-9009 Volume-5, Issue-3, Jul.-2017
http://iraj.in
Outlook of Sediment Microbial Fuel Cell For Power Generation and Bioremediation of Contaminants
45
OUTLOOK OF SEDIMENT MICROBIAL FUEL CELL FOR POWER
GENERATION AND BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINANTS
1SYED ZAGHUM ABBAS, 2MOHDRAFATULLAH, 3NORLI ISMAIL,
4MUHAMMAD IZZUDDINSYAKIR
Division of Environmental Technology, School of Industrial Technology, UniversitiSains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
E-mail address: zaghum2009@gmail.com
Abstract - Due to lack of a membrane and completely anoxic, sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) are different from
microbial fuel cells. The simultaneous production of renewable energy, bioremediation of contaminants and moderate
functioning parameters, SMFCs have attracted the attention of many researchers. For power generation, many
exoelectrogens in SMFCs have the ability to transfer electrons from electrodes by using four ways of natural electron
shuttles. The most dominant mechanism is long-range electron transfer via conductive pili. The powering by microbes is an
emerging technique for the remediation of contaminants from sediments. The pathways for transferring electrons in
electrotrophs operate in the opposite direction from those in exoelectrogens.This review briefly targets on the SMFC
prototype, power generation and contaminants remediation.
Keywords - Electrodes, Electrotrophs, Exoelectrogens, Power generation
I. INTRODUCTION
In general, sediment is recognized a major “sink” for
contaminants, specifically for some persistent organic
pollutants and heavy metals. These pollutants may
accumulate to concentrations many fold above than
those in the water column. In recent years, the
pollution of the aquatic environment has become a
global problem because of its toxic effects on living
organisms. Due to their bio-accumulation in the
ecosystem and their toxic effects, heavy metals are of
particular concern among environmental pollutants
[1]. Many conventional methods have been used for
the remediation of sediments, such as ozonation,
dredging, and electro-chemical degradation, but their
high cost and harsh nature limits their widespread
application [2]. Thus, the natural degradation of
sediments by microorganisms, including methods
such as immobilization, degradation, and
decomposition, has received much interest due to its
reduced cost and environmentally benign nature. The
microorganisms have many diverse metabolic routes
by which they can easily degrade/transform the
sediment pollutants into less toxic forms [3].
However, the natural degradation/transformation of
sediment heavy metals by microorganisms is a very
slow process because there is a lack of proper
electron donors and acceptors. Thus, to boost this
metabolic process, a system is needed that can easily
provide a proper electron acceptor and donor for
simultaneous sediments heavy metal remediation and
electricity generation.
There are many types of fuels cells. Many reports that
environmental microbes can easily build
electrochemical signaling with solid electrodes have
rapidly led to the microbial fuel cells (MFCs)
development [4]. An MFC is a device that converts
the chemical energy of organic and inorganic
compounds into electricity using bacteria, and in this
device, pollutant treatment and electricity generation
are simultaneously achieved [5]. Sediment microbial
fuel cells (SMFCs) are a special application of MFCs
for sediment remediation and electricity production.
There are many advantages of SMFCs for sediment
remediation to remove various contaminants while
producing renewable energy: 1) for the natural
bioconversion mechanisms, the electrode can provide
a less aggressive, inexhaustible, clean and flexibly
portableelectron acceptor or donor; 2) SMFCs cause
minimum distraction to the native aquatic habitat; and
3) controllable electrochemical parameters can be
easily monitored for the remediation processes [6].
II. SEDIMENT MICROBIAL FUEL CELLS
(SMFCs)
Electricity production by bacteria was first observed
by Potter. Very few practical advances were achieved
in the field of MFC for the next 55 years. In the early
1990s, researchers were primarily using exogenous
chemical mediators (natural red, methyl viologen,
potassium ferricyanide, thonin, anthraquinone 2-6,
disulfonate, and others) for the transfer of electrons
from inside bacteria to electrodes, but these
exogenous chemical mediators (electron shuttles) are
often toxic and unstable . Kim et al. achieved the first
breakthrough in the field of MFCs when they found
that without the addition of exogenous mediators, the
bacteria could transfer the electrons to electrodes [7].
The prototype SMFCs consist of a graphite anode
placed in an anaerobic sediment and a graphite
cathode placed in water containing dissolved oxygen.
The performance of SMFCs depends on the potential
gradient of the sediment-water interface. Around both
the anode and cathode, copper wires are tangled
because they are very good electrical conductors. To
make the SMFCs efficient, a multi-anode system is
typically used; approximately 11 anodes are sufficient
International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology, ISSN: 2321-9009 Volume-5, Issue-3, Jul.-2017
http://iraj.in
Outlook of Sediment Microbial Fuel Cell For Power Generation and Bioremediation of Contaminants
46
for a single cathode [8]. Thus, both electrodes are
connected with the external circuit that is attached to
a multi-meter data logger to monitor the system.
SMFCs provide an appropriate model to examine
how energy flows through microbial consortia and
how we can collect the energy from a natural system;
their potential role in power generation and the
bioremediation of contaminants in the environment
can be explored. Some potential SMFC types that can
easily degrade/transform sediments containing heavy
metals with simultaneous electricity production are
discussed in the next sections. The prototype of
general SMFCs is shown in Figure 1. Following are
the possible forms of SMFCs.
2.1. Aerobic non-stimulated SMFCs
The prototype for this SMFC is the same as
mentioned above. This SMFC type is very similar to
a natural aquatic environment because it is not
stimulated externally, and an oxygen sparger is
inserted in the cathode chamber to create the aerobic
environment [9].
2.2. Aerobic stimulated SMFCs
This SMFC is stimulated by an external battery, and
the main difference is that the multi-cathode system is
developed by opposing the direction of the external
battery terminals because heavy metals normally
require high potential for reduction or degradation
[10].
2.3. Anaerobic non-stimulated SMFCs
The prototype of this SMFC is the same as for the
aerobic SMFC with the only difference that there is
no external oxygen supply [11]. The entire system is
tightly closed, which prevents the introduction of
oxygen into the system and maintains an anaerobic
environment for the fermentation activities of
anaerobic bacteria.
2.4.Anaerobic stimulated SMFCs
The structure of this SMFC is the same as for the
non-stimulated anaerobic SMFC except that it is
stimulated by an external battery, and a multi-anode
system is created by opposing the direction of the
external battery terminals. This step is used because
the initial current in the external battery from the
positive terminal and heavy metals in the sediments is
easily reduced by the external current due to the
integration of the cathode into sediments [12].
Fig.1. The schematic prototype of a general double-chamber SMFC.
III. EXOELECTROGENS
Many exoelectrogenic bacterial strains are known that
can easily transfer electrons to electrodes, e.g.,
Rhodopseudomonaspalustris,
Geobactersulfurreducens, Geobacterloveleyi,
Anaeromyxobacterdehalogenas, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, Geothrixfermentas,
Thermincolacarboxydophila, Shewanellaoneidensis,
Shewanellaputrefaciens, Escherichia coli, and
Thermincolapotens. Recently, some pathogenic
bacterial strains, such asOchrobactrum anthropic and
Klebsiella pneumonia [13], have been reported to
produce current in SMFCs.The electrons are
transferred from bacteria to SMFC electrodes through
four mechanisms like Electron transfer by soluble
electron-shuttling molecules, short-range direct
electron transfer by redox-active proteins, long-range
electron transport through conductive pili and direct
interspecies electron transfer.
IV. ELECTROTROPHS
Microbes that have ability to accept electrons from
electrodes are called electrotrophs. The electrotrophs
discovery opened a new research direction for the
remediation of heavy metals through reduction. To
date, many microbial consortia have shown the
properties of electrotrophs. Many bacteria such as
Staphylococcus carnosus, Enterococcus faecalis,
Lactobacillus farciminis, Kingelladenitrificans,
Shigellaflexneri, Streptococcus Mutans,
Dechlorospirillum anomalous, Clostridium
ljungdahlii[14], and Acinetobactercalcoaceticus have
International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology, ISSN: 2321-9009 Volume-5, Issue-3, Jul.-2017
http://iraj.in
Outlook of Sediment Microbial Fuel Cell For Power Generation and Bioremediation of Contaminants
47
different redox-active molecules that can act as
electrons shuttles, accept the electrons from
electrodes, and deliver them to bacteria to promote
the reduction of inorganic substrates and
fermentation.
CONCLUSIONS
SMFCs have created a new research direction that
may prove to be environmentally sustainable and
more controllable and cost-effective for power
generation and the bioremediation of contaminated
sediments. The electron transfer mechanisms of
exoelectrogens and electrotrophs are well
investigated mostly in Shewanella spp. and
Geobacterspp.; so research about electron transfer
mechanisms in other exoelectrogens and
electrotrophs are also needed. The challenges of
SMFCs will be overcome by joint endeavors from
researchers in many disciplines such as
environmental studies, biotechnology,
electrochemistry, computer science, electronics,
materials science, and biology.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to express their appreciation
to UniversitiSains Malaysia Global Fellowship
(USMGF) for the support and research facilities for
this project.
REFERENCES
[1] Zoumis T, Schmidt A, Grigorova L, and Calmano
W,“Contaminants in sediments: remobilisation and
demobilization”, Scienceof the Total Environment, vol. 266,
pp.195-202, 2001.
[2] Rosado D, Usero J, and Morillo J,“Assessment of heavy
metals bioavailability and toxicity toward Vibrio fischeri in
sediment of the Huelva estuary”, Chemosphere, vol.
153,pp.10-17, 2016.
[3] Qu C, Li B, Wu H, Wang S, and Li F, “Probabilistic
ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediments
from China’s major aquatic bodies”,Stochastic
Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, vol.30,
pp.271-282, 2016.
[4] Abbas SZ, Rafatullah M, Ismail N, and Lalung J,“Isolation,
identification, characterization, and evaluation of cadmium
removal capacity of Enterobacter species”,Journal of Basic
Microbiology, vol. 54, pp. 1279-1287, 2016.
[5] Abbas SZ, Rafatullah M, Ismail N, and Lalung J,“Isolation
and characterization of Cd-resistant bacteria from industrial
wastewater”,Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 56,
pp.1037-1046, 2015.
[6] Muhammad N, Banoori N, Akbar A, Azizullah A, Khan M,
and Qasim M,“Microbial and toxic metal contamination in
well drinking water: potential health risk in selected areas of
Kohat, Pakistan”,Urban Water Journal, pp. 1-7, 2016.
[7] Nwadinigwe CA, Udo GJ, and Nwadinigwe AO,“Seasonal
variations of heavy metals concentrations in sediment
samples around mayor tributaries in ibeno coastal area,
Niger Delta, Nigeria”,International Journal of Scientific and
Technology Research, vol.3, pp. 254-265, 2014.
[8] Malami D, Zakaria Z, Mohammed M, and Audu
A,“Comparison of Levels of some Metals in the Water and
Sediment from Challawa Gorge Dam, Kano,
Nigeria”,Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, vol.
7, pp. 80-84, 2014.
[9] Sany BT, Sulaiman A, Monazami G, and Salleh
A,“Assessment of sediment quality according to heavy
metal status in the West Port of Malaysia”,World Academy
of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 74, pp. 639-
643, 2011.
[10] Li W-W, and Yu H-Q,“Stimulating sediment
bioremediation with benthic microbial fuel cells”,
Biotechnology advances, vol. 33, pp.1-12, 2015.
[11] Habibul N, Hu Y, Wang Y-K, Chen W, Yu H-Q, and Sheng
G-P,“Bioelectrochemical Chromium (VI) Removal in Plant-
Microbial Fuel Cells”,Environmental science &
Technology, vol. 50, pp. 3882-3889, 2016.
[12] Abbas, SZ, Rafatullah M, Ismail N, Syakir MI,“A review on
sediment microbial fuel cells as a new source of sustainable
energy and heavy metal remediation: Mechanisms and
future prospective”,International Journal of Energy
Research, Doi: 10.1002/er.3706.
[13] ElMekawy A, Hegab HM, Mohanakrishna G, Elbaz AF,
Bulut M, and Pant D,“Technological advances in CO2
conversion electro-biorefinery: a step toward
commercialization”,Bioresource Technology, vol. 215, pp.
357-370, 2016.
[14] Lovley DR,“Microbial fuel cells: novel microbial
physiologies and engineering approaches”,Current Opinion
in Biotechnology, vol.17, pp.327-332, 2006.

... Sediments were considered to be a place where pollutants accumulate to concentrations that were many times the layer of water at the top. This causes the organic matter contained in the sediment to increase (ranging from 0. 4 to 2. 2 wt%), so that it could be used as a substrate by microorganisms to carry out its activities [13,14]. The microorganisms that played a role were fermentative bacteria and electrogenic bacteria found to coexist in sediments. ...
Article
Full-text available
SMFC was a sustainable solution that could currently be applied to address the problem of water availability and environmental pollution with the additional result of electricity. This researched study on discussing the potential of sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFC) in domestic wastewater treatment (greywater) by analyzing the removal efficiency of turbidity and its metals, as well as the electrical energy produced. The studied was conducted by laboratory-scale experiments without any combination of treatments. Two main ingredients, namely domestic wastewater (greywater) and sediment. The sample of domestic wastewater (greywater) was determined at the scale of the settlement area, especially on Old Bitoa Street, Borong, Manggala district, Makassar, and sediment samples were determined from Tallo river sediments, Makassar. The experimental studied in this study carried out by designing an SMFC device made from a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cylinder, using carbon electrodes with a surface area of 15.5744 cm2, the anode placed in the sediment zone, and the cathode placed in the domestic wastewater zone (greywater). The SMFC was operated in open circuit voltage mode and then monitored for 240 hours under ambient temperature conditions (25 oC - 30 oC). The quality of domestic wastewater (greywater) was analyzed using turbidity parameters and metal parameters (Fe and Mn metals) according to the Indonesian national standard method (SNI) and showed a significant efficiency of contaminant removal at 88.05% for turbidity, 69.10% for Fe metal, and 56. 63% for Mn metal. While the performance of SMFC in producing electrical energy observed from the value of the power density produces for 240 haours, the highest power density value was 0.0318 W m-2
Article
Full-text available
In this study, the load of microorganisms and concentration and daily intake of toxic metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb) in drinking water sources (wells) of three towns, Mian Khail (MK), Mer Ahmad Khail (MAK) and Gari Banurian (GB), in Kohat city of Pakistan were investigated. Multifactorial analysis was conducted to determine the microbial and toxic metals load in drinking water of the investigated towns. The obtained results revealed that the fecal coliform bacteria (FCB), Salmonella, Shigella and Staphylococci were the highest in MAK followed by MK and GB. The toxic metals concentrations and their intake load in the study area was in the order: Cd > Pb > Cu > Zn. However, the concentrations of toxic elements were within the permissible limits set by the Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency (PAK EPA). The study area had a higher load of enteric pathogens such as the Shigella sp., fecal coliform and Staphylococci in the potable water wells. The redundancy analysis (RDA) illustrated that total viable count TVB, Cu, Staphylococci and FCB were higher in MAK, fungi and Shigella sp. in GB and the Pb concentration was higher in MK. It is concluded that water in the study area is fecally contaminated and can cause health hazards. It is recommended that there should be a proper monitoring of water quality in the area to improve the existing quality and prevent further contamination of drinking water in the study area.
Article
Full-text available
Level of some Metals (Cd,Cr,Mn,Pb,Zn,Na and K) was seasonally determined in the water and sediments of Challawa Gorge dam.The result obtained showed that the values of the metal contents were generally higher in the dry season than the wet season. The metal contents of the water and sediment were obtained using the nitric acid digestion method. All the metals analyzed except Na and K were determined using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (flame emission spectroscopic method). Variations in concentrations were found for the heavy metals ranging between (0.01and1.41mg/l) in water and (1.0 and 1.64 mg/kg) in the sediments. Sodium and potassium were found in concentrations ranging between 7.65±0.28 and 11.32±8.62mg/l in water and between 50.32±18.08mg/l and 144.19±12.09mg/kg in the sediments respectively. The statistical comparison of the values between the wet and dry season in water as well as those in sediment shows no significant difference at P>0.05. All the metals were found to be within the permissible limits as recommended by WHO/NOAA for quality water and sediments except for the levels of iron (Fe) in water which was found to be above the acceptable limit. The sediments contained higher concentration of heavy metals than the water. This may be attributed to the fact that sediments usually serves as repositories in an aqueous environment.Keywords: Heavy metals, sediment, wet season, dry season, water.
Article
Sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) are different from microbial fuel cells because they are completely anoxic and lack a membrane. SMFCs are a novel technology for the simultaneous production of renewable energy and bioremediation of heavy metals. Recently, SMFCs have attracted the attention of many researchers because of their moderate functioning parameters and ability to use a range of biodegradable substrates like glucose, glutamic acid, river water, cysteine, acetate, and starch. The inocula used in SMFCs include river sediment, marine sediment, and wastewater. For power generation, many exoelectrogens in SMFCs have the ability to transfer electrons from electrodes by using natural electron shuttles. Exoelectrogens use four primary pathways to transfer electrons to the electrodes, including short-range electron transfer through redox-active proteins, soluble electron shuttling molecules, long-range electron transport by conductive pili, and direct interspecies electron transfer. The most dominant mechanism is long-range electron transfer via conductive pili because pili have metal-like conductivity. The powering by microbes is an emerging technique for the remediation of heavy metals from sediments. The pathways for transferring electrons in electrotrophs operate in the opposite direction from those in exoelectrogens. To further upgrade SMFC technology, this review targets the prototype, operating factors, working mechanisms, applications, and future perspectives of SMFCs.
Article
Plant-microbial fuel cell (PMFC) is a renewable and sustainable energy technology that generates electricity with living plants. However, little information is available regarding the application of PMFC for the remediation of heavy metal contaminated water or soil. In this study, the potential for the removal of heavy metal Cr(VI) using PMFC was evaluated, and the performance of the PMFC at various initial Cr(VI) contents was investigated. The Cr(VI) removal efficiency could reached 99% under various conditions. Both the Cr(VI) removal rates and the removal efficiencies increased with the increasing initial Cr(VI) concentration. Furthermore, the long-term operation of the PMFC indicated that the system was stable and sustainable for Cr(VI) removal. The mass balance results and XPS analysis results demonstrate that only a small amount of soluble Cr(III) remained in the PMFC and that most Cr(III) precipitated in the form of the Cr(OH)3(s) or was adsorbed onto the electrodes. The PMFC experiments of without acetate addition also show that plants can provide carbon source for MFC through secrete root exudates and bioelectrochemical reduction of Cr(VI) was the main mechanism for the Cr(VI) removal. These results extend the application fields of PMFC and might provide a new insight for Cr(VI) removal from wastewater or soil.
Article
Eight heavy metals (Cu, Cr, Zn, Hg, Pb, Cd, Ni and As) were analyzed in sediment samples in the dry and wet seasons from November 2009 to October 2010 in West Port of Peninsular Malaysia. The heavy metal concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) were ranged from 23.4 to 98.3 for Zn, 22.3 to 80 for Pb, 7.4 to 27.6 Cu, 0.244 to 3.53 for Cd, 7.2 to 22.2 for Ni, 20.2 to 162 for As, 0.11 to 0.409 for Hg and 11.5 to 61.5 for Cr. Metals concentrations in dry season were higher than the rainy season except in cupper and chromium. Analysis of variance with Statistical Analysis System (SAS) shows that the mean concentration of metals in the two seasons (α level=0.05) are not significantly different which shows that the metals were held firmly in the matrix of sediment. Also there are significant differences between control point station with other stations. According to the Interim Sediment Quality guidelines (ISQG), the metal concentrations are moderately polluted, except in arsenic which shows the highest level of pollution.
Article
An overall and comparative ecological risk assessment of heavy metals (including Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn, Hg and As) in surface sediments from China’s eight major aquatic bodies was conducted to better understand their potential risks on a national scale. By applying the joint approach of Hakanson risk index (RI) and Monte Carlo simulation, ecological risk in this work is expressed as probability distribution of RI values instead of single point calculations to reflect the uncertainties in risk assessment process. The results show that the highest ecological risks posed by heavy metals existed in Xiangjiang River and Dianchi Lake. Although only a slim margin of high risk (651.88/600 = 1.08 and 700.61/600 = 1.17) was identified based on average RI values, the probabilities of high risk level derived from Monte Carlo simulation reached as high as 56.7 and 52.9 % in these two aquatic bodies, respectively. And the probability of low risk level was less than 1.6 %. Furthermore, the risk was mainly contributed by Hg and Cd, discharged through local intensive mining and industrial activities. The findings indicate that rigid control and effective management measures to prevent heavy metal pollution are urgently needed in China, especially for the high-risk aquatic bodies. This study shows that the joint approach can be used to identify the high risk water bodies and the major metal pollutants. It may avoid overestimating or underestimating the ecological risk and provide more decision-making support for risk alleviation in the polluted aquatic bodies.