ArticlePDF Available

Astyanax taurorum a new species from dos Touros River, Pelotas River drainage, an upland southern Brazilian river (Characiformes: Characidae)

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

A new species of Astyanax belonging to the Astyanax scabripinnis complex is described from dos Touros River, tributary of the Pelotas River, Uruguay River basin. Astyanax taurorum sp. nov. is distinguished from other species of the Astyanax scabripinnis species complex by having two humeral spots, the first vertically elongated; teeth of inner row of premaxilla with three to five cusps; 2-3 (modes 2 or 3) maxillary teeth; 20-23 (mode 22) branched anal-fin rays; 13-15 (mode 14) gill rakers on lower branch of the first branchial arch; 20-23 (mode 21) total gill rakers in first branchial arch; 33-36 (mode 35) perforated lateral line scales. Astyanax taurorum sp. nov. is similar to Astyanax paris; nevertheless, it can be readily distinguished from it by having a smaller head depth (73.6-83.1% vs. 86.4-95.6%) and smaller interorbital width (24.1-28.0% vs. 30.8-32.8%). In addition, it differs from A. paris by the presence a posttemporal hook-shaped posterodorsal margin.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Astyanax taurorum a new species from dos Touros River, Pelotas River
drainage, an upland southern Brazilian river (Characiformes: Characidae)
Carlos Alberto S. de Lucena1, Amanda Bungi Zaluski1, Zilda Margarete Seixas de Lucena1
1Museu de Ciências e Tecnologia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Avenida Ipiranga 6681,
Caixa Postal 1491, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Carlos Alberto S. de Lucena (lucena@pucrs.br)
http://zoobank.org/2C4F6889-11BA-4C8A-9E1C-4C6CF36D50C6
ABSTRACT. A new species of Astyanax belonging to the Astyanax scabripinnis complex is described from dos Touros River,
tributary of the Pelotas River, Uruguay River basin. Astyanax taurorum sp. nov. is distinguished from other species of the Astya-
nax scabripinnis species complex by having two humeral spots, the first vertically elongated; teeth of inner row of premaxilla
with three to five cusps; 2–3 (modes 2 or 3) maxillary teeth; 20–23 (mode 22) branched anal-fin rays; 13–15 (mode 14) gill
rakers on lower branch of the first branchial arch; 20–23 (mode 21) total gill rakers in first branchial arch; 33–36 (mode 35)
perforated lateral line scales. Astyanax taurorum sp. nov. is similar to Astyanax paris; nevertheless, it can be readily distin-
guished from it by having a smaller head depth (73.6-83.1% vs. 86.4–95.6%) and smaller interorbital width (24.1–28.0%
vs. 30.8–32.8%). In addition, it differs from A. paris by the presence a posttemporal hook-shaped posterodorsal margin.
KEY WORDS. Taxonomy, Rio Grande do Sul, Uruguay River, distribution.
INTRODUCTION
The fishes of the genus Astyanax Baird & Girard, 1854 in-
habit Neotropical drainages from the Colorado River in Texas and
New Mexico in the United States to Northern Patagonia, Argen-
tina (Menni 2004, López et al. 2008, Ornelas-Garcia et al. 2008).
As suggested by phylogenetic analyses based on morphological
(Mirande 2010) and molecular evidence (Javonillo et al. 2010,
Oliveira et al. 2011), Astyanax is not monophyletic. The genus
comprises 150 valid species (Eschmeyer et al. 2016), and it is still
defined as in Eigenmann (1921, 1927) (for the characters, see
Marinho and Ohara 2013). The Astyanax scabripinnis complex is
a non-monophyletic group with 29 species (Ingenito and Duboc
2014: tab. 1). It is characterized, according to Bertaco and Lucena
(2006), by possessing the deepest and most robust body area close
to the middle length of the pectoral fins, a robust head, snout
short and abrupt, body depth smaller than 41% of SL, reduced
number of branched anal-fin rays (13-23, rarely 22 or 23 rays),
presence of one or two humeral spots, and a dark mid-lateral
body stripe extending to the tip of the middle caudal-fin rays.
Currently, there are 19 recognized species of Astyanax from
the Uruguay River, Laguna dos Patos system to the Tramandaí
River drainage: A. aramburui Protogino, Miquelarena & López,
2006; A. bagual Bertaco & Vigo, 2015; A. brachypterygium Bertaco
& Malabarba, 2001; A. cremnobates Bertaco & Malabarba, 2001;
A. douradilho Bertaco, 2014; A. dissensus Lucena & Thofehrn,
2013; A. eigenmanniorum (Cope, 1894); A. henseli Melo & Buckup,
2006; A. lacustris (Luetken, 1875); A. laticeps (Cope, 1894); A.
obscurus (Hensel, 1870); A. ojiara Azpelicueta & Garcia, 2000;
A. paris Azpelicueta, Almirón & Casciotta, 2002; A. pirabitira
Lucena & Bertcaco, 2013; A. procerus Lucena, Castro & Bertaco,
2013; A. saguazu Casciotta, Almirón & Azpelicueta, 2003; A.
stenohalinus Messner, 1962), Astyanax sp. aff. fasciatus, sensu
Melo and Buckup (2006); and A. xiru, Lucena, Castro & Bertaco,
2013. While studying the genus Astyanax from the Pelotas River
drainage, a new species of the Astyanax scabripinnis complex was
found and it is described herein.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The examined material belongs to the following institu-
tions: Museu de Ciências e Tecnologia, Pontifícia Universidade
Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (MCP); Museu de
Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (MZUSP); Mu-
séum d’histoire naturelle, Genève (MHNG); Universidade Federal
do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (UFRGS).
RESEARCH ARTICLE
ZOOLOGIA 34: e20174 | DOI: 10.3897/zoologia.34.e20174 | September 18, 2017 1 / 8
ZOOLOGIA 34: e20174
ISSN 1984-4689 (online)
zoologia.pensoft.net
Counts and measurements follow Fink and Weitzman
(1974) and Bertaco and Lucena (2006) with the addition of
the head depth, measured at the vertical through posterior
margin of the orbit. Measurements were preferentially taken
on the left side of specimens using callipers (0.1 mm approxi-
mation). Counts of vertebrae, supraneurals, teeth of dentary,
unbranched dorsal, and anal-fin rays taken from cleared and
stained (c&s) specimens prepared according to the protocol of
Taylor and van Dyke (1985). Vertebral counts included the four
vertebrae of the Weberian apparatus, and the terminal centrum
counted as a single element. In the description, the frequency
of each count is given in parentheses after the respective value.
In the material examined, the total number of specimens in
the lot follows each catalogue number, and in parentheses is
the number of specimens measured and counted with their
respective standard length range. HL stands for head length
throughout.
The Laguna dos Patos system and the Tramandaí River
drainage, follow definitions of Malabarba (1989) and Malabarba
and Isaia (1992), respectively. Data for A. paris are from Azpeli-
cueta et al. (2002), except when said otherwise.
TAXONOMY
Astyanax taurorum sp. nov.
http://zoobank.org/F15C02B5-AF1B-4052-A67A-741560E1468F
Fig. 1, Table 1
Types series. Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul, Bom Jesus. Holo-
type: Tributary of dos Touros River ca. 4 km northeastern of the
road BR-285, Pelotas River drainage, 1,056 m a.s.l., 28°41’06”S
50°12’51”W, 12 Feb 2016, J. Pezzi da Silva and E. Pereira leg.,
MCP 49468, 80.7 mm SL. Paratypes: Tributary of dos Touros
River, on the road Silveira-Rondinha, ca. 28°39’08”S 50°18’25”W,
14 Jan 1989, C. Lucena, P. Azevedo and E. Pereira leg., MCP
14370, 20 (17, 22.2-82.6 mm SL, 3 c&s, 29.6–62.6 mm SL).
Same locality of MCP 14370, MZUSP 120697, 1, 29.9 mm SL.
Dos Touros River, dowstream dam, Pelotas River drainage, road
Rondinha – Silveira, 998 m a.s.l., 28°38’44”S, 50°17’06”W, 12 Feb
2016, J.P. Silva and E. Pereira leg., MCP 49467, 1, 75.7 mm SL.
Diagnosis. Astyanax taurorum sp. nov. belongs to the
A. scabripinnis species complex and is distinguished from the
species of that complex by having two humeral spots (vs. one
in A. courensis Bertaco, Carvalho & Jerep, 2010, A intermedius
Eigenmann, 1908, A. jenynsii (Steindachner, 1877), A. jordanensis
Vera Alcaraz, Pavanelli & Bertaco, 2009, A. laticeps (Cope, 1894),
A. microschemos Bertaco & Lucena, 2006, A. serratus Garavello &
Sampaio, 2010, A. totae Haluch & Abilhoa, 2005, A. rivularis and
A. varzeae Abilhoa & Duboc, 2007); 20–23 total gill rakers in first
branchial arc (vs. 16 in A. jacobinae Zanata and Carmelier, 2008,
16–17 in A. gymnogenys Eigenmann, 1911, 18 in A. burgerai Za-
nata & Carmelier, 2009, 17–18 in A. troya Azpelicueta, Casciotta
& Almirón, 2002, 18–19 in A. epiagos Zanata & Carmelier, 2008,
17–19 in A. ojiara Azpelicueta & Garcia, 2000, A. cremnobates
Bertaco & Malabarba, 2001 and A. leonidas Azpelicueta, Casciotta
& Almirón, 2002); 13–15 gill rakers on the lower branch of the
first branchial arch (vs. 9–10 in A. turmalinensis Triques, Voino
& Caiafa, 2003); 33–36 perforated lateral line scales (vs. 39–41 in
A. gymnogenys and A. eremus Ingenito & Duboc, 2014, 40–43 in
A. guaricana Oliveira, Abilhoa & Pavanelli, 2013); 20–23, usually
21 or 22, branched anal-fin rays (vs. 18–19 in A. burgerai, 13–16
in A. goyanencis Miranda Ribeiro, 1944, 16–20, usually 16 or 17
in A. serratus Garavello & Sampaio, 2010, 14–18 in A. microsche-
mos, 15–18 in A. totae, 12–16 in A. brachypterychium, 14–18 in A.
cremnobates, and 13–17 in A. epiagos and A. jordanensis); inner
row of premaxilla with teeth bearing three to five cusps (vs.
heptacuspid in A. ita Almirón, Azpelicueta & Casciotta, 2002
and A. pirabitira Lucena, Bertaco & Berbigier, 2013); 2–3 max-
illary teeth (vs. 1 in A. obscurus Hensel, 1870, A. ojiara, A. troya
Azpelicueta, Casciotta & Almirón, 2002, A. guaricana, A. courensis
and A. ita Almirón, Azpelicueta & Casciotta, 2002; 0–1 in A.
pirapuan Tagliacollo, Britzke, Silva & Benine, 2011); length of
anal-fin base 23.6–28.0% (mean = 26.3%) of SL (vs. 19.8–24.3%
(mean = 21.5%) of SL in A. eremus and 30.2% in A. scabripinnis
Jenyns, 1842 in the holotype); body depth 33.8–37.6% of SL (vs.
26.9–29.7% in A. microschemos, and 27.3–31.3% in A. eremus);
head length 29.0–30.5% of SL (vs. 22.9–25.1% in A. gymnogenys,
21.9–27.1% in A. courensis, 26.6–28.2% in A. turmalinensis, and
23.9–26.6% of SL in A. guaricana); eye diameter 29.0–32.4% of
Table 1. Morphometric data of Astyanax taurorum sp. nov. The range
includes the holotype; n = number of specimens; SD = standard
deviation.
Holotype n Range Mean SD
Standard length (mm) 80.7 14 54.7–82.6 69.6
Percents of standard length
Depth at dorsal-fin origin 34.9 14 33.8–37.6 35.9 0.99
Predorsal length 52.8 14 51.6–54.9 53.5 0.99
Prepectoral length 29.0 14 27.8–30.0 29.1 0.61
Preanal length 66.4 14 65.0–68.7 66.4 1.04
Prepelvic length 50.5 14 49.1–52.2 51.0 0.88
Dorsal-fin length 25.9 14 22.3–26.6 24.6 1.24
Pectoral-fin length 22.7 14 18.6–22.7 20.6 1.22
Pelvic-fin length 15.6 14 14.4–16.8 15.2 0.62
Anal-fin base length 26.9 14 23.6–28.0 26.3 1.08
Anal-fin lobe length 17.0 13 13.2–18.3 16.3 1.56
Caudal peduncle length 14.0 14 12.7–15.7 14.2 0.88
Caudal peduncle depth 11.4 14 11.0–12.7 11.5 0.42
Head length 29.1 14 29.0–30.5 29.9 0.75
Percents of head length
Head depth 83.1 14 75.1–86.7 81.6 2.98
Snout length 25.1 14 23.8–28.8 27.1 1.58
Interorbital width 26.7 14 24.7–28.0 26.4 0.99
Horizontal orbit diameter 30.3 14 29.0–32.4 30.7 1.22
Upper jaw length 38.4 14 36.7–41.5 39.2 1.60
C.A.S. de Lucena et al.
ZOOLOGIA 34: e20174 | DOI: 10.3897/zoologia.34.e20174 | September 18, 20172 / 8
Figure 1. Astyanax taurorum sp. nov., MCP 49468, 80,7 mm SL, holotype, tributary of dos Touros River, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Figures 2–3. (2) Head depth as function of head length for Astyanax paris (y = -1.517 +(0.996X), R = 0.952, and Astyanax taurorum sp. nov.
(y = -5·158+(1.037X), R = 0.932. Dotted lines, confidence interval of 95%; (3) Astyanax taurorum sp. nov. Posterodorsal region of head
(lateral view, right side); EXS = Extrascapular, PTE = posttemporal, SCL = supracleithrum. White arrow indicates the hook on posterodorsal
region of posttemporal bone (see text). Scale bar = 0.2 mm.
HL (vs. 24.4–26.1% in A. gymnogenys, and 36.8–40.3% in A. jaco-
binae); snout length 23.8–28.8% of HL (vs. 16.0–20.4% in A. pa-
ranae); and interorbital length 24.7–28.0% of HL (vs. 35.2–37.8%
in A. gymnogenys, 29.6–37.3% in A. jacobinae, 30.4–34.5% in A.
goyanensis, 37.5–47.1% in A. intermedius, 29.8–37.7% in A. varzea,
32.7–40.9% in A. guaricana, 30.6–35.7% in A. jordanensis, 40.7%
in A. scabripinnis holotype), and 31.7–39.2% in A. pirapuan).
Within the Astyanax scabripinnis complex, Astyanax taurorum sp.
nov. is most similar to A. paris Azpelicueta, Almirón & Casciotta,
2002 – species known from the type locality, Arroio Fortaleza,
tributary of upper Uruguay River, Argentina – with which most
counts and morphometric percentages overlap. Nevertheless,
Astyanax taurorum sp. nov. differs from A. paris by the presence
of hooks on branched anal-fin rays (vs. secondary sexual dimor-
phism absent in A. paris), interorbital width 24.7–28.0% HL (vs.
28.4–32.8% HL) and head depth 73.6–86.7% HL (vs. 86.4–96.6%
HL) (Fig. 2) (Table 2), and by having posterodorsal margin of
the posttemporal hook-shaped (Fig. 3) (see Discussion). Astyanax
taurorum sp. nov. is distinguished from the other species in the
genus by the following combination of characters: presence of
two conspicuous humeral spots, the first one vertically elongated
with the upper portion enlarged, but narrowing ventrally; dark
midlateral horizontal stripe; conspicuous caudal spot extending
posteriorly to the middle of caudal-fin rays; 20–23 branched
anal-fin rays; 20–23 total gill rakers in first branchial arc; 33–36
perforated lateral line scales; 5–7 scale rows between lateral line
A new species of Astyanax from southern Brazil
ZOOLOGIA 34: e20174 | DOI: 10.3897/zoologia.34.e20174 | September 18, 2017 3 / 8
and pelvic-fin origin; outer row of premaxilla with tricuspid
teeth; teeth in inner row of premaxilla with three to five cusps;
2–3 tricuspid teeth in the maxilla, head length 29.0–30.5% of
SL; body depth 33.8–37.6% of SL; interorbital width 24.7–28.0%
of HL; eye diameter 29.0–32.4% of HL, and length of anal-fin
base 23.6–28.0% of SL.
Description. Morphometric data summarized in Table 1.
Body compressed and moderately elongate, greatest body depth
at vertical through near middle length of pectoral fin. Dorsal
profile of head convex from tip of snout to vertical through
nostrils, straight from that point to vertical through posterior
border of orbital, slanted until tip of supraoccipital spine. Snout
relatively slender. Dorsal profile of body convex from tip of su-
praoccipital bone to dorsal-fin origin; straight from that point
to end of caudal peduncle. Ventral body profile convex from
mandibular symphysis to pelvic-fin origin, nearly straight from
that point to anal-fin origin, and slanted along anal-fin base.
Dorsal and ventral profiles of caudal peduncle nearly straight.
Mouth terminal or slightly subterminal, slit below hor-
izontal passing through middle of eye. Posterior tip of maxilla
extending between vertical through anterior margin of orbit and
the vertical through middle of orbit. Two tooth rows in premaxilla;
outer row with 3*(2), 4(13), or 5(5) tricuspid teeth; inner row with
five teeth, usually bearing four cusps on first tooth, five cusps on
second to fourth tooth, three cusps on fifth tooth. Maxilla with 2(8)
or 3(8) tricuspid teeth. Dentary with four large pentacuspid teeth,
followed by seven small tricuspid teeth and one conical tooth (two
c&s). Median cusp in all cuspidate teeth longer than remaining
cusps; cusp tips slightly curved inwardly on dentary (Fig. 4).
Dorsal-fin rays ii, 9 (23); first unbranched ray short, one-
half length of second ray. Distal margin of dorsal fin slightly con-
vex. Dorsal-fin origin slightly behind middle of SL. Adipose-fin
origin at vertical through base of fifth or sixth last anal-fin rays.
Anal-fin rays iii-iv 20(2), 21(6), 22(9), or 23(4). Anal-fin origin
posterior to vertical through base of last dorsal-fin ray. Pecto-
ral-fin rays i, 11(1), 12(7), 13(11), or 14(1). Tip of pectoral-fin
tip ending one scale before or, occasionally, reaching pelvic-fin
insertion. Pelvic-fin rays i, 7(23), tip of fin not reaching anal-fin
origin. Axillary scale present.
Table 2. Morphometric data of Astyanax paris.* = Values from Azpelicueta et al. (2002). **The range includes the holotype. Museo de La
Plata (MLP), Muséum d’histoire naturelle (MNHG), Museu de Ciências e Tecnologia PUCRS (MCP). n = number of specimens, m = mean.
Measurements
Holotype Paratypes Topotypes
MLP 9584 MLP 9586 MNHG 2623.65 MCP 34461
n Range** m n Range** m n Range m
Standard length (mm) 75.6* 7 51.3–86.1* 72.4 3 70.3–73.1 71.6 4 66.9–73.5 70.4
Percentages of head lenght
Head depth 95.6 7 86.4–96.6 93.1 3 90.7–92.6 91.8 4 88.2–92.6 89.6
Interorbital width 32.8* 15 28.4–32.8* 30.8* 4 30.8–32.1 31.2
Figure 4. Maxilla, premaxilla and dentary of Astyanax taurorum sp.
nov., MCP 14370, paratype, 62.6 mm SL, lateral view of right side.
Scale bar = 0.5 mm.
C.A.S. de Lucena et al.
ZOOLOGIA 34: e20174 | DOI: 10.3897/zoologia.34.e20174 | September 18, 20174 / 8
Caudal-fin forked, lobes similar in size.
Lateral line complete with 33(2), 34(2), 35(8), or 36(5)
perforated scales. Scale rows between dorsal-fin origin and lateral
line 6(5) or 7(12); scale rows between lateral line and pelvic-fin
origin 5(5), 6(13), or 7(1); scale rows between lateral line and
anal-fin origin 5(1), 6(15), or 7(1); scale rows around caudal
peduncle 14 (8), 15(5), or 16(2).
Precaudal vertebrae 13 (3); caudal vertebrae 18(2) or 19(1);
total vertebrae 31(2) or 32(2). Supraneurals 5(3). Gill rakers on
upper branch 6(1), 7(11) or 8(11) and on lower branch 13(7),
14(14), or 15(2) in first branchial arch; total gill rakers in first
branchial arch 20(3), 21(13), 22(6), or 23(1).
Color in alcohol. Dorsal and dorsolateral portions of head
and body dark brown. Scales on lateral of body with dark brown
chromatophores sometimes concentrated on anterior border.
Two conspicuous humeral spots. Anterior humeral spot vertically
elongate with upper portion wider, located on second to third or
fourth scale vertical series, extending three horizontal scale series
above lateral line; lower portion narrow, extending on the lateral
line and one or two horizontal scale series below it. Posterior
humeral spot large, absent in small specimens (22.8–29.4 mm
SL), reaching but not surpassing lateral line ventrally, extending
on two or three horizontal scale series and three vertical scale
series. Humeral spots separated by a clear area occupying two
or three vertical scale series. Dark midlateral strip inconspicu-
ous anteriorly, but conspicuous posteriorly from about vertical
through middle of dorsal-fin base to caudal peduncle; absent
in small specimens (22.8–29.4 mm SL). Caudal peduncle spot
triangular, extending over median caudal-fin rays. Scattered dark
chromatophores on dorsal, anal, and caudal fins. Pectoral and
pelvic-fins hyaline or covered by sparse dark chromatophores.
Color in life. Overall body olive green, silvery below lateral
line. Humeral spots and caudal peduncle spot conspicuous. Dor-
sal, anal, pelvic and caudal fins reddish. Pectoral-fin yellowish.
Dark brown blotches located on anterior portion of scales.
Sexual dimorphism. Hooks on anal-fin rays of four speci-
mens with 75.4 to 80.6 mm SL (MCP 14370). Hooks short,
conical or slightly retrorse found on the first or third to eighth
branched rays, along the posterolateral margin of the posterior
branch. One pair on each segment. One specimen with a single
hook on the third branched anal-fin ray and another specimen
with a very small hook on the first branched ray and small
protuberances on other rays.
Distribution and habitat. Astyanax taurorum sp. nov. is
known from the dos Touros River drainage, tributary of Pelotas
River, which in turn is a tributary of Uruguay River (Fig. 5). The
Pelotas River drainage is located in the region named “Campos
de Altitude do Planalto das Araucárias (= Araucaria Plateau in
Bertaco et al. 2016)” or “Campos de Cima da Serra”, which has
a high level of endemism of fishes (Malabarba et al. 2009, Berta-
co et al. 2016: 430) and other groups of animals (for example:
sponges, Ribeiro et. al. 2009; crustaceans, Bond-Buckup et al.
2009). The dos Touros River tributary, type locality of Astyanax
taurorum sp. nov., has a low to medium flow, transparent waters
with stones and rocks on the bottom and moderate emergent
marginal vegetation (Fig. 6). Four characid species were caught
along with Astyanax taurorum sp. nov.: Bryconamericus patriciae
Silva, 2004, B. iheringi Boulenger, 1887, Cheirodon interruptus
Jenyns, 1842, and Oligosarcus brevioris Menezes, 1987.
Etymology. The specific name taurorum, is derived from
the Latin masculine noun taurus (second declension, meaning
bull) inflected in the plural and genitive case. Therefore taurorum
Figures 5–6. (5) Distribution of Astyanax taurorum sp. nov., white circle = type-locality. The symbol represents more than one locality;
(6) stream tributary of dos Touros River, type locality of Astyanax taurorum sp. nov.
A new species of Astyanax from southern Brazil
ZOOLOGIA 34: e20174 | DOI: 10.3897/zoologia.34.e20174 | September 18, 2017 5 / 8
means “of the bulls” in reference to “rio dos Touros“ (= Portu-
guese, which means “river of the bulls”) the type locality.
Conservation status. Astyanax taurorum sp. nov. is likely
rare and occurs in low densities. All type specimens were collected
in the dos Touros River drainage, during two field trips in 1989
and 2016. Over the last four decades (from 1980 to 2016), six
field trips to the dos Touros River system have been conducted by
the MCP team, two of which with the sole purpose of collecting
specimens of A. taurorum. Unfortunately, no specimens were
collected in 2015, and only two were found in 2016. The Museu
de Ciências Naturais (FZB, Porto Alegre) and Universidade Federal
do Rio Grande do Sul also conducted field surveys in that region,
but no specimens of A. taurorum sp. nov. were obtained. Despite
the reduced number of specimens collected and the apparently
restricted geographical distribution of the new species, we did
not assign Astyanax taurorum sp. nov. to any threat category
because we the lack biology data for it. Instead, we considered
A. taurorum sp. nov. as data deficient (DD) (IUCN 2014).
Additional material. Types: Argentina: Astyanax paris,
MNHG 2623.065 paratypes, 3 (70.3–73.1 mm SL), arroio Fortale-
za. MCP 34461 topotypes, 5 (4, 66.9–73.5 mm SL, 1 c&s 68.2 mm
SL). Astyanax troya, MCP 28438 paratypes. All c&s specimens:
Types: Brazil: Astyanax cremnobates, paratypes MCP 11650 (2);
Astyanax dissensus, paratypes MCP 17361 and MCP 47518 (1);
Astyanax douradilho, paratypes MCP 25700 (3);Astyanax elachy-
lepis, paratype MCP 16054 (1); Astyanax eremus, paratypes MCP
46942 (1); Astyanax jordanensis, paratype MCP 41915(1); Astya-
nax microschemos, paratype MCP 34366 (1); MCP 19783 (5);
Astyanax pelecus, paratype MCP 17919 (1); Astyanax pirabitira,
paratypes MCP 14390 (6); Astyanax utiariti, paratypes MCP 40041
(3); Astyanax procerus, paratype MCP 25513 (1); Astyanax xiru,
paratype MCP 21730 (1). Non-types: Astyanax lacustris, MCP
20339 (1); Astyanax eigenmanniorum MCP 25122 (1); Astyanax
henseli MCP 48121 (3); Astyanax aff fasciatus MCP 21627 (1);
Astyanax laticeps, MCP 25690 (1), MCP 17614 (1), MCP 27619
(2); Astyanax obscurus MCP 26125 (2)); Astyanax saguazu MCP
16808 (1), and MCP 4000 (3); Astyanax sp. UFRGS 14052 (6),
UFRGS 14051 (6) and UFRGS 14055 (6); Hyphessobrycon anisitsi
MCP 21633 (2); Markiana nigripinnis MCP 17086 (1).
DISCUSSION
The Astyanax scabripinnis species complex is not a mono-
phyletic group; this clustering, however artificial, facilitates
discussions and comparisons on the diversity of the genus ac-
cording to Bertaco and Lucena (2006). These authors presented
a series of morphological characters that delimit this complex,
which are mostly found in A. taurorum sp. nov. except for the
abrupt snout (slender in A. taurorum sp. nov.).
Mirande (2010) presented the most encompassing, mor-
phology-based phylogeny of Characidae. Astyanax taurorum sp.
nov. has all synapomorphies that define node 201 in that anal-
ysis (sister group of Tetragonopterinae clade): dorsal expansion
in the rhinosphenoid absent (character 48, state 0), and tubule
with anterior branch parallel to anterior margin of maxilla,
reaching a third of its length (character 98, state 1). Node 201
has two branches, the Hyphessobrycon luetkenii clade and node
200. The new species shares all synapomorphies of node 200:
fourth infraorbital approximately square, or more developed
longitudinally than dorsoventrally (67, state 0); coronomecke-
lian situated dorsal to Meckelian cartilage (character 110, state
1); 24 or less branched anal-fin rays (288, state 0). Node 200
has two branches named Astyanax paris and node 199 clades.
For now, we note that A. taurorum shares, with the former
clade, “the abrupt decrease in size of dentary teeth (character
148, state 1)” and not the synapomorphy of clade 199 “ventral
margin of horizontal process of anguloarticular perpendicular
to laterosensory canal of dentary from medial view”. We have
examined some species of the clade at node 199, mostly included
in the Astyanax clade (node 267) (e.g., Astyanax lacustris Lutken,
1875 and A. eigenmanniorum Cope, 1894, Markiana nigripinnis
Perugia, 1891, and Hyphessobrycon anisitsi Eigenmann, 1907),
and other representatives of Astyanax not analyzed by Mirande
(see Additional material). None of them have a posterodorsal
margin with posttemporal hook-shape, as it is the case with A.
taurorum, though some species have an enlarged posterodorsal
margin, which is not hook-shaped (see Mirande 2010: fig. 48).
Astyanax is represented in the Laguna dos Patos, Traman-
daí River, and Uruguay River drainages, by 20 species, eight
of which have restricted distribution within these drainages
(Fig. 5): A. bagual Bertaco & Vigo, 2015 (middle Taquari-Antas
River), A. brachypterigium (upper Pelotas River and upper das
Antas River), A. cremnobates (upper das Antas River, upper Caí
River and upper Maquiné River), A. douradilho (middle and
upper portions of Maquiné River), A. obscurus (upper das Antas
and upper Caí Rivers), A. ojiara (upper Yaboty-Guazu River),
A. paris (upper Yaboty-Guazu River), and A. taurorum sp. nov.
(upper dos Touros River). With the exception of A. bagual and
A. douradilho, these species are included in the A. scabripinnis
complex (Ingenito and Duboc 2014) and are mainly found in
headwater streams. Astyanax laticeps, in contrast, is the only
species of the Astyanax scabripinnis complex that is widely dis-
tributed, occurring in the three main drainages of Rio Grande
do Sul, besides the southern and southeastern coastal rivers of
Brazil (Lucena and Bertaco 2010). Recent descriptions of new
species in different genera (e.g., characiforms Bryconamericus
patriciae, Hollandichthys taramandahy Bertaco & Malabarba,
2013, siluriforms Trichomycterus tropeiro Ferrer & Malabarba,
2011, or perciforms Australoheros taura Ottoni & Cheffe, 2009
and Crenicichla lucenai Mattos, Schindler, Ottoni & Cheffe,
2014), with restricted distributions on the headwaters men-
tioned above, as well as the occurrence of 43 undescribed
fish species in these drainages (Bertaco et al. 2016: 428),
demonstrate the importance of conservation of this type of
environment, as remarked by other authors (e.g., Ferrer and
Malabarba 2011, Ferrer et al. 2015).
C.A.S. de Lucena et al.
ZOOLOGIA 34: e20174 | DOI: 10.3897/zoologia.34.e20174 | September 18, 20176 / 8
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to the following colleagues: Vinicius
Bertaco (Museu de Ciências Naturais-FZB) for offering sugges-
tions to an earlier version of this manuscript; Carlos Oliveira
(Universidade Estadual de Maringá) for providing information
about the genus Astyanax; Alessio Datovo (MZUSP), Luiz R. Mala-
barba (UFRGS), and Sonia Fisch-Muller (MHNG), who provided
material for this study; and José Pezzi da Silva, Rafael Angrazani
and Edson Pereira for their efforts in the field. Paulo Lucinda,
Universidade Federal do Tocantins, for his help with the specific
name. We thank CNPq/PUCRS for grants received to ABZ.
LITERATURE CITED
Azpelicueta M, Almiron A, Casciotta JR (2002) Astyanax paris: A
new species from the Río Uruguay Basin of Argentina (Characi-
formes, Characidae). Copeia 2002: 1052–1056. https://doi.
org/10.1643/0045-8511
Bertaco VA, Lucena CAS (2006) Two new species of Astyanax
(Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Characidae) from eastern Brazil
with a synopsis of the Astyanax scabripinnis species complex.
Neotropical Ichthyology 4: 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1590/
S1679-62252006000100004
Bertaco VA, Lucena CAS (2010) Redescription of Astyanax obs-
curus (Hensel, 1870) and A. laticeps (Cope, 1894) (Teleostei:
Characidae): two valid freshwater species originally described
from rivers of Southern Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 8: 7–20.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252010000100002
Bertaco VA, Ferrer J, Carvalho FR, Malabarba LR (2016) Inven-
tory of the freshwater fishes from a densely collected area in
South America – a case study of the current knowledge of
Neotropical fish diversity. Zootaxa 4138: 401–440. https://doi.
org/10.11646/zootaxa.4138.3.1
Bond-Buckup G, Buckup L, Araujo PB, Zimmer A, Quadros A,
Sokolowicz C, Castiglioni D, Barcelos D, Gonçalves R (2009)
Crustáceos. In: Boldrin I (Org.) Biodiversidade dos campos do
Planalto das Araucárias. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Secreta-
ria de Biodiversidade e Florestas, Brasília, 110–129.
Eigenmann CH (1921) The American Characidae. Part 3. Memoirs
of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 43: 209–310.
Eigemnann CH (1927) The American Characidae. Part 4. Memoirs
of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 43: 311–428.
Eschmeyer W (2016) Catalog of Fishes. California Academy of Sci-
ences. Avaliable online at: http://researcharchive.calacademy.
org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp [Accessed:
23/08/2016]
Ferrer J, Malabarba LR (2011) A new Trichomycterus lacking pelvic
fins and pelvic girdle with a very restricted range in Southern
Brazil (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae). Zootaxa 2912: 59–67.
Ferrer J, Donin L, Malabarba LR (2015) A new species of Itugla-
nis Costa & Bockmann, 1993 (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae)
endemic to the Tramandaí-Mampituba ecoregion, southern
Brazil. Zootaxa 4020: 375–389. https://doi.org/10.11646/zoo-
taxa.4020.2.8
Fink WL, Weitzman SH (1974) The So-called Cheirodontin Fishes of
Central America with Descriptions of Two New species (Pisces:
Characidae). Smithsonian Institution. Smithsonian Contributions
to Zoology 172: 1–46. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810282.172
Ingenito LFS, Duboc LF (2014) A new species of Astyanax (Osta-
riophysi: Characiformes: Characidae) from the upper rio Iguaçu
basin, southern Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 12: 281–290.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20130117
IUCN (2014) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories
and Criteria. Standards and Petitions Subcommittee, version
11, Avaliable online at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/
RedListGuidelines.pdf [Accessed: 30/11/2015]
Javonillo R, Malabarba LR, Weitzman SH, Burns JR (2010) Relation-
ships among major lineages of characid fishes (Teleostei: Os-
tariophysi: Characiformes), based on molecular sequence data.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54: 498–511. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.026
López H, Menni R, Donato M, Miquelarena A (2008) Biogeo-
graphical revision of Argentina (Andean and Neotropi-
cal Regions): an analysis using freshwater fishes. Journal of
Biogeography 35: 1564–1579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.
1365-2699.2008.01904.x
Malabarba LR (1989) Histórico sistemático e lista comentada das
espécies de peixes de água doce do Sistema da Laguna dos
Patos, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Comunicações Museu Ciências
PUCRS, Série Zoologia, 2: 107–179.
Malabarba LR, Isaia EA (1992) The fresh water fish fauna of the Rio
Tramandaí drainage, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil with a discussion
of its historical origin. Comunicações Museu Ciências PUCRS,
Série Zoologia, 5: 197–223.
Malabarba LR, Fialho CB, Anza JA, Santos JF, Mendes GN (2009)
Peixes. In: Boldrin I (Ed.) Biodiversidade dos campos do Planal-
to das Araucárias. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de
Biodiversidade e Florestas, Brasília, 133–155.
Marinho MF, Ohara WM (2013) Redesciption of Astyanax guapo-
rensis Eigenmann, 1911 (Characiformes: Characidae), a small
characid from the rio Madeira basin. Zootaxa 3652: 475–484.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3652.4.5
Menni RC (2004) Peces y Ambientes em La Argentina continental.
Monografias del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Bue-
nos Aires, 316 pp.
Mirande JM (2010) Phylogeny of the family Characidae (Teleostei:
Characiformes): from characters to taxonomy. Neotropi cal
Ichthyology 8: 385–568. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-
62252010000300001
Oliveira C, Avelino GS, Abe K, Mariguela T, Benine R, Orti G, Vari
R, Castro RMC (2011) Phylogenetic relationships within the
speciose family Characidae (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characi-
formes) based on multilocus analysis and extensive ingroup
sampling. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11, 1–25. https://doi.
org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-275
A new species of Astyanax from southern Brazil
ZOOLOGIA 34: e20174 | DOI: 10.3897/zoologia.34.e20174 | September 18, 2017 7 / 8
Ornelas-Garcia CP, Domínguez-Domínguez O, Doadrio I (2008)
Evolutionary history of the fish genus Astyanax Baird & Girard
(1854) (Actinopterygii, Characidae) in Mesoamerica reveals
multiple morphological homoplasies. BMC Evolutionary Biolo-
gy, 8, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-340
Ribeiro CV, Barbosa R, Machado V, Cunha G (2009) Esponjas. In:
Boldrin I (Org.) Biodiversidade dos campos do Planalto das
Araucárias. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodi-
versidade e Florestas, Brasília, 99–108.
Taylor WR, van Dyke GC (1985) Revised procedures for staining
and clearing small fishes and other vertebrates for bone and
cartilage study. Cybium 9: 107–119.
Submitted: 27 September 2016
Received in revised form: 21 March 2017
Accepted: 11 May 2017
Editorial responsibility: Paulo Buckup
Author Contributions: CASL and ZMSL analyzed the data and
wrote the paper. ABZ examined specimens and take the counts
and measurements.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing
interests exist.
C.A.S. de Lucena et al.
ZOOLOGIA 34: e20174 | DOI: 10.3897/zoologia.34.e20174 | September 18, 20178 / 8
... Institutional abbreviations follow Fricke & Eschmeyer (2017). Comparisons with species not cited in the 'Comparative material examined' were based on the literature information (e.g., Eigenmann, 1921Eigenmann, , 1927Azpelicueta & Garcia, 2000;Bertaco & Malabarba, 2001;Melo, 2001;Azpelicueta et al., 2002a;Azpelicueta et al., 2002b;Almirón et al., 2002;Haluch & Abilhoa, 2005;Bertaco & Lucena, 2006;Triques et al., 2003;Abilhoa & Duboc, 2007;Alcaraz et al., 2009;Azpelicueta & Loureiro, 2009;Bertaco & Lucena, 2010;Garavello & Sampaio, 2010;Tagliacollo et al., 2011;Oliveira et al., 2013Oliveira et al., , 2017Lucena et al., 2013;Ingenito & Duboc, 2014;Lucena et al., 2017). UFBA 8162, 18, 17.4-53.7 mm SL;NUP 19985, 8, 30.5-53.5 having a low number of branched anal-fin rays (16-21, mode =17) and highest body depth approximatelly at vertical through pectoral-fin midlength (vs. ...
... Similarly, A. intermedius Eigenmann and A. ita Almirón, Azpelicueta & Casciotta, instead of having the highest body depth approximatelly at vertical through pectoral-fin midlength, as expected to members of the aforementioned species complex, possess the highest body depth at the dorsal-fin origin. As discussed by several authors (e.g., Bertaco & Malabarba, 2001;Abilhoa & Duboc, 2007;Lucena et al., 2017 ), the A. scabripinnis species complex lacks a phylogenetic diagnosis and possibly does not represent a monophyletic unit. However, Lucena et al. (2017) remarked that, although possibly artificial, the recognition of a Astyanax scabripinnis speciesgroup facilitates discussions and comparisons within the species-rich genus Astyanax and because of that, we retain it here as well. ...
... As discussed by several authors (e.g., Bertaco & Malabarba, 2001;Abilhoa & Duboc, 2007;Lucena et al., 2017 ), the A. scabripinnis species complex lacks a phylogenetic diagnosis and possibly does not represent a monophyletic unit. However, Lucena et al. (2017) remarked that, although possibly artificial, the recognition of a Astyanax scabripinnis speciesgroup facilitates discussions and comparisons within the species-rich genus Astyanax and because of that, we retain it here as well. Future phylogenetic studies incorporating a larger sampling of the diversity of Astyanax are required to provide a comprehensive hypothesis of relationships within the genus and, thus, a better delimitation of its species groups. ...
Article
Full-text available
Astyanax lorien and A. rupestris are described from tributaries of upper rio Paraguaçu basin, Bahia, Brazil. Both species shares the majority of the characters currently used to define the Astyanax scabripinnis species complex, with highest body depth approximately at vertical through pectoral-fin midlength and a low number of branched anal-fin rays (15–21). Astyanax lorien is distinguished from its congeners by a combination of characters, including presence of small bony hooks on all fins of mature males, a unique vertically elongate humeral blotch, and ventral margin of the third infraorbital close to the horizontal limb of preopercle. Astyanax rupestris is distinguished from its congeners also by a combination of characters, including ventral margin of third infraorbital distinctly separated from horizontal limb of preopercle, leaving a broad area without superficial bones, absence of midlateral stripe on body, absence of blotch on caudal peduncle, and presence of a vertically elongated conspicuous dark humeral blotch, not bordered anteriorly and posteriorly by distinct unpigmented areas. Both species are apparently endemic to the upper portion of the Paraguaçu river basin, within the Chapada Diamantina domain.
... Cambeva flavopicta is only known from an area at about 910 m asl and C. tourensis from an area at about 1050 m asl. Furthermore, the characid Astyanax taurorum Lucena et al., 2017 is uniquely known from the same area where C. tourensis was found (Lucena et al., 2017), suggesting that this is an upland area of endemism, with taxa belonging to different groups restricted for different taxa, therefore with special concern for conservation proposals. ...
... Cambeva flavopicta is only known from an area at about 910 m asl and C. tourensis from an area at about 1050 m asl. Furthermore, the characid Astyanax taurorum Lucena et al., 2017 is uniquely known from the same area where C. tourensis was found (Lucena et al., 2017), suggesting that this is an upland area of endemism, with taxa belonging to different groups restricted for different taxa, therefore with special concern for conservation proposals. ...
Article
The presence of paired appendages supported by endoskeleton elements is primarily shared by all gnathostomes, but secondarily lost in different lineages. Absence of pelvic fin and girdle is a condition relatively rare among trichomycterine catfishes, but a recent morphological study suggest that pelvic loss have occurred independently within the genus Cambeva. Herein we perform a molecular phylogenetic analysis encompassing all the five pelvic-less species of Cambeva, including two that are new: Cambeva podostemophila Costa, Feltrin & Katz sp. nov., which is supported by molecular and morphological data as sister to Cambeva poikilos, a species with well-developed pelvic fin and girdle; and Cambeva tourensis Costa, Feltrin & Katz sp. nov., that is sister to Cambeva flavopicta, another pelvic-less species. The ancestral character state reconstruction indicates that pelvic-fin loss occurred four times independently in Cambeva. Field observations indicated that C. podostemophila is closely associated to the podostemacean aquatic herb Podostemum rutifolium, consisting of the first record of trichomycterid– podostemacean association.
... The new genus Andromakhe includes several species with an unusually high number of maxillary teeth among those classified in Astyanax. Most of the species in this genus were relatively recently described (Azpelicueta et al., , 2003Casciotta et al., 2003a;Mirande et al., 2004), as also 'Astyanax' taurorum (Lucena et al., 2017) that differs from Andromakhe paris mainly by the presence of secondary sexual hooks in mature males (vs. absence in A. paris) and probably should also be transferred to Andromakhe. ...
Article
The freshwater fish genus Astyanax is one of the most diverse among the Characidae. The genus is defined by a combination of character states that are widely distributed in Characidae. In addition, the genus has the broadest geographical distribution in the family, being found in a great variety of environments of the Neotropical region. Although phylogenetic relationships were treated only partially, many authors agree that the genus is not monophyletic. In this contribution, we study the phylogenetic relationships of Astyanax in the context of the family Characidae, by combining morphological and molecular data. A total of 520 morphological characters, nine molecular markers and 608 taxa are analysed, of which 98 belong to Astyanax. According to our results, Astyanax is not monophyletic. We recovered species attributed to Astyanax in different subfamilies: Gymnocharacinae (including the type species), Stevardiinae and Tetragonopterinae. Among the species recovered in Gymnocharacinae, most (including the type species, the resurrected Psalidodon, and the new genus Andromakhe gen. nov.) were recovered in Gymnocharacini, while the remaining ones were recovered in Probolodini (transferred to Deuterodon or the new genus Makunaima gen. nov.).
... The new genus Andromakhe includes several species with an unusually high number of maxillary teeth among those classified in Astyanax. Most of the species in this genus were relatively recently described (Azpelicueta et al., , 2003Casciotta et al., 2003a;Mirande et al., 2004), as also 'Astyanax' taurorum (Lucena et al., 2017) that differs from Andromakhe paris mainly by the presence of secondary sexual hooks in mature males (vs. absence in A. paris) and probably should also be transferred to Andromakhe. ...
Article
The freshwater fish genus Astyanax is one of the most diverse among the Characidae. The genus is defined by a combination of character states that are widely distributed in Characidae. In addition, the genus has the broadest geographical distribution in the family, being found in a great variety of environments of the Neotropical region. Although phylogenetic relationships were treated only partially, many authors agree that the genus is not monophyletic. In this contribution, we study the phylogenetic relationships of Astyanax in the context of the family Characidae, by combining morphological and molecular data. A total of 520 morphological characters, nine molecular markers and 608 taxa are analysed, of which 98 belong to Astyanax. According to our results, Astyanax is not monophyletic. We recovered species attributed to Astyanax in different subfamilies: Gymnocharacinae (including the type species), Stevardiinae and Tetragonopterinae. Among the species recovered in Gymnocharacinae, most (including the type species, the resurrected Psalidodon, and the new genus Andromakhe gen. nov.) were recovered in Gymnocharacini, while the remaining ones were recovered in Probolodini (transferred to Deuterodon or the new genus Makunaima gen. nov.).
... The Lake Guaíba contributes to the formation of the Guaíba basin, and constitutes the biggest lacustrine complex in South America (Noronha, 1998;Menegat & Kirchheim, 2006 (Lucena et al., 2013;2017). Their helminth fauna is still very poorly known and considering the trematodes, only three species of digenetic trematodes (Dendrorchis retrobiloba Volonterio & Ponce de Léon, 2005, Genarchella parva Travassos, Artigas & Pereira, 1928and Zonocotyle bicaecata Travassos, 1948 have been reported in A. aff. ...
Article
Full-text available
In Argentina, Saccocoelioides bacilliformis Szidat, 1973 was described from specimens collected probably in Astyanax bimaculatus (Linnaeus, 1758), but latter it was synonymyzed with Saccocoelioides octavus Szidat, 1970. During the examination of digenetic trematodes collected in different species of Astyanax Baird & Girard, 1854 from southern Brazil, we found specimens identified as Saccocoelioides. A detailed comparison of the morphology of the two species revealed that they should be considered valid, thus this study proposes the revalidation of S. bacilliformis. The traits that allowed the revalidation were: body shape, position of the caecal bifurcation, and the extension of the uterus and vitellarium. Parameters of infections are provided for the first time in addition to records of new hosts and new locality.
... A total of 20 species of Astyanax Baird & Girard, 1854 have been reported from Rio Grande do Sul State, southern Brazil. These species are found in the Uruguay river drainage basin, Patos Lagoon system, and in Tramandaí river system (Lucena et al. 2017). In Lake Guaíba the following species of Astyanax have been considered abundant: Astyanax eigenmanniorum (Cope, 1894), Astyanax aff. ...
Article
Full-text available
The acanthocephalan species Quadrigyrus torquatus Van Cleave, 1920 has been found in different hosts from South America, but recent papers have not focused on its morphology traits. Different species of Astyanax Baird & Girard, 1854 were collected with seine nets between January 2017 and October 2017 in Pintada Island, Lake Guaíba, Porto Alegre city (30º17’11’’S and 51º18’01”W), Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Acanthocephalans found in cysts were processed according to the techniques for the group. Specimens of Q. torquatus were identified based mainly in the morphology of proboscis hooks and trunk spines, and by the measurements made using light microscopy. Supplemental observations on the morphology of Q. torquatus were made for the first time considering the morphology and amount of hooks and spines. The amplitude of intensity of infections was 1 (A. aff. fasciatus) and 1‒3 (A. lacustris) helminths. This difference could be related to the number of hosts examined, the feeding habit of the hosts or related to aspects in the parasite life cycle. This paper is the first report of Q. torquatus in A. aff. fasciatus and A. lacustris from Lake Guaíba, extending the distribution to the southernmost state of Brazil, thus contributing to the knowledge of acanthocephalans in freshwater fishes from South America.
... Institutional abbreviations follow Fricke & Eschmeyer (2017). Comparisons with species not cited in the 'Comparative material examined' were based on the literature information (e.g., Eigenmann, 1921Eigenmann, , 1927Azpelicueta & Garcia, 2000;Bertaco & Malabarba, 2001;Melo, 2001;Azpelicueta et al., 2002a;Azpelicueta et al., 2002b;Haluch & Abilhoa, 2005;Bertaco & Lucena, 2006;Triques et al., 2003;Abilhoa & Duboc, 2007;Alcaraz et al., 2009;Azpelicueta & Loureiro, 2009;Bertaco & Lucena, 2010;Garavello & Sampaio, 2010;Tagliacollo et al., 2011;Oliveira et al., 2013Oliveira et al., , 2017Lucena et al., 2013;Ingenito & Duboc, 2014;Lucena et al., 2017). (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) and highest body depth approximately at vertical between midlength to final third of the pectoral-fin (vs. ...
Article
Full-text available
A new species of Astyanax from the upper rio Paraguaçu basin, Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil, is described. Astyanax sincora shares characters currently used to define the Astyanax scabripinnis species complex, as highest body depth approximately at vertical through pectoral-fin midlength and a low number of branched anal-fin rays (13–17). It differs from its congeners by a combination of characters, including eight branched dorsal-fin rays, six branched pelvic-fin rays, presence of bony hooks in pectoral and anal fins of males, dark midlateral line or stripe initiating posteriorly to the vertically elongate humeral blotch, and by the presence of 30–35 scales in the median longitudinal series. The generic positioning of the new species and some polymorphic morphological characters in Astyanax are briefly discussed. The degree of completeness of the lateral line in Hyphessobrycon balbus is discussed.
... Institutional abbreviations follow Fricke & Eschmeyer (2017). Comparisons with species not cited in the 'Comparative material examined' were based on the literature information (e.g., Eigenmann, 1921Eigenmann, , 1927Azpelicueta & Garcia, 2000;Bertaco & Malabarba, 2001;Melo, 2001;Azpelicueta et al., 2002a;Azpelicueta et al., 2002b;Haluch & Abilhoa, 2005;Bertaco & Lucena, 2006;Triques et al., 2003;Abilhoa & Duboc, 2007;Alcaraz et al., 2009;Azpelicueta & Loureiro, 2009;Bertaco & Lucena, 2010;Garavello & Sampaio, 2010;Tagliacollo et al., 2011;Oliveira et al., 2013Oliveira et al., , 2017Lucena et al., 2013;Ingenito & Duboc, 2014;Lucena et al., 2017). (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) and highest body depth approximately at vertical between midlength to final third of the pectoral-fin (vs. ...
Article
Full-text available
A new species of Astyanax from the upper rio Paraguaçu basin, Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil, is described. Astyanax sincora shares characters currently used to define the Astyanax scabripinnis species complex, as highest body depth approximately at vertical through pectoral-fin midlength and a low number of branched anal-fin rays (13–17). It differs from its congeners by a combination of characters, including eight branched dorsal-fin rays, six branched pelvic-fin rays, presence of bony hooks in pectoral and anal fins of males, dark midlateral line or stripe initiating posteriorly to the vertically elongate humeral blotch, and by the presence of 30–35 scales in the median longitudinal series. The generic positioning of the new species and some polymorphic morphological characters in Astyanax are briefly discussed. The degree of completeness of the lateral line in Hyphessobrycon balbus is discussed.
... Heptapterus mustelinus reaches the largest body size among the three species (maximum observed 262.9 mm L S ), three times as long as the largest measured specimen of H. exilis (76.8 mm L S ). When compared visually, H. exilis has a more slender and narrow body than H. mustelinus, but these differences are not reflected in discrete morphometric differences (Table 2) (Ferrer & Malabarba, 2011;Tencatt et al., 2016;Lucena et al., 2017;Reis, 2017), all endemic to this area. The description of H. carnatus adds one more species to list of fishes endemic to the Araucaria forest plateau ecoregion, highlighting the importance of aquatic conservation in this region. ...
Article
Full-text available
As part of an ongoing taxonomic revision of the genus Heptapterus from the Laguna dos Patos and Uruguay River drainages and Atlantic coastal streams of southern Brazil and Uruguay, two new species closely related to Heptapterus mustelinus were identified. Both species are endemic to small tributaries of the Uruguay River. The two new species are distinguished from each other and from other species of Heptapterus by arrangement of cephalic and trunk laterosensory systems, number of vertebrae and number of dorsal, pectoral and anal‐fin rays. Phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial DNA (coI and cytb) sequence data further supports distinctiveness of the two new species. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
A new species of Astyanax from tributaries of the rio de Contas, Bahia, Brazil, is described. The new species differs from congeners by having three horizontal series of scales from lateral line to pelvic-fin origin and the distal margin of third infraorbital distinctly separated from vertical and horizontal limbs of preopercle, leaving a broad area not covered by superficial bones. The new species further differs from most congeners by the presence of bony hooks on all fins of mature males. Particularly from congeners occurring in rivers of the Northeastern Mata Atlântica freshwater ecoregion, it further differs by having the highest body depth just anterior to the dorsal-fin origin, 34-37 pored lateral line scales, a vertically elongated conspicuous dark humeral blotch reaching below the lateral line and a conspicuous dark wide midlateral stripe extending from the clear area on the rear of the humeral blotch to the end of middle caudal-fin rays and forming an inconspicuous blotch on caudal peduncle.
Article
Full-text available
The family Characidae is the most diverse among Neotropical fishes. Systematics of this family are mainly based on precladistic papers, and only recently a phylogenetic hypothesis for Characidae was proposed by the author. That phylogeny was based on 360 morphological characters studied for 160 species, including representatives of families related to Characidae. This paper is based on that phylogenetic analysis, with the analyzed characters described herein and documented, accompanied by comparisons of their definition and coding in previous papers. Synapomorphies of each node of the proposed phylogeny are listed, comparisons with previous classifications provided, and autapomorphies of the analyzed species listed. Taxonomic implications of the proposed classification and the position of the incertae sedis genera within Characidae are discussed. A discussion of the phylogenetic information of the characters used in the classical systematics of the Characidae is provided.
Article
Full-text available
We herein analyse the history of the description of the freshwater fish fauna from three drainages in one of the most densely collected areas of Brazil, and possibly of South America, the Rio Grande do Sul State, southern Brazil. An updated inventory of the freshwater fish species from rio Uruguay (partial) in Brazil, Laguna dos Patos (complete) and rio Tra-mandaí basins (complete) is presented. We found the number of new species described in these drainages increased nearly 56% since 1981, reaching a total of 422 species, but even now 10% of this number still corresponds to undescribed species. This rate of species description suggests that previous estimates of the Neotropical fish fauna are low, and we predict a final number of Neotropical fishes larger than the largest prediction estimate (8,000 species), after other regions of South and Central Americas become densely sampled. We discuss and attempt to demonstrate that species diversity knowledge is historically and strictly related to collecting efforts. We also demonstrate that the ecoregions in eastern South America with the highest density of species per area correspond to the areas more densely sampled in collections, and this may represent a bias in such kinds of analyses. This uneven sampling in Brazilian regions is apparently associated with the uneven distribution of Zoological research centers in different regions of the country. Small-sized species represents an important source of new species, along with little explored regions or little explored habitats, sometimes associated with restricted range species, and species complexes that need revisionary work. In contrast to other Neotropical regions, Atheriniformes are relatively diverse, sharing the fifth place in species richness with Gymnotiformes, and there is a remarkably high number of species of Rivulidae. Eight species are endemic to the rio Tramandaí drainage, 68 to the Laguna dos Patos system, and 78 to the rio Uruguay drainage. Almost 10% of the freshwater fish species are " Critically Endangered " , " Endangered " or " Vulnerable " according to the IUCN criteria, with Rivulidae as the family with the largest number of threatened species. Resumo Neste artigo analisamos a história da descrição dos peixes de água doce de três drenagens em uma das áreas mais densa-mente amostradas do Brasil e possivelmente da América do Sul, o estado do Rio Grande do Sul, sul do Brasil. Um inven-tário atualizado das espécies de peixes de água doce do rio Uruguai (parcial) no Brasil, Laguna dos Patos (completo) e bacia do rio Tramandaí (completo) é apresentado. O número de novas espécies descritas para estas drenagens aumentou quase 56% desde 1981, atingindo um total de 422 espécies, mas mesmo assim cerca de 10% desse número corresponde ainda a espécies não descritas. Esta taxa de descrição de espécies supera todas as estimativas anteriores de espécies não descritas na ictiofauna neotropical, e podemos prever um número final de espécies neotropicais maior do que a maior pre-visão disponível (8.000 espécies), quando outras regiões Sul e Centro-Americanas tornarem-se densamente amostradas. Discutimos e demonstramos que o conhecimento da diversidade das espécies é historicamente estritamente relacionado ao esforço de coleta. Também demonstramos que as ecorregiões no leste da América do Sul com a maior densidade de espécies por área correspondem às áreas mais densamente amostradas em coleções, e isso pode representar um viés nesse
Article
Full-text available
Ituglanis boitata, new species, is described from the rio Tramandaí system and rio Mampituba and Araranguá basins, southern Brazil. This new species is distinguished from congeners with the exception of I. bambui, I. boticario, I. paraguassuensis and I. proops by the supraorbital canal of the cephalic laterosensory system interrupted between nasal and frontal sections and the presence of pore s2 (vs. supraorbital canal uninterrupted and pore s2 absent). Ituglanis boitata differs from these species in osteological characters, measurements and body coloration. Ituglanis boitata presents a noticeable endemism in the Tramandaí–Mampituba freshwater ecoregion, a recognized biogeographic unit for freshwater fishes including other 22 endemic species. A discussion about the intraspecific variation in the cephalic laterosensory system within Trichomycterinae is also provided.
Article
Full-text available
During recent expeditions to several localities in the rio Madeira basin, a poorly known species of Characidae described more than a century ago, Astyanax guaporensis Eigenmann, was collected. The species is herein redescribed based on the type material and many recently collected specimens. The species seems to occur only in the rio Madeira basin, rio Amazonas drainage. The species is mainly recognized among its congeners by having five to nine maxillary teeth, a series of V-shaped marks on the midlateral line of body, and the absence of a black mark on the caudal peduncle.
Article
Full-text available
Astyanax saguazu, new species, is distinguished by the following combination of characters: two or three maxillary teeth, third or fourth tooth of outer premaxillary series inserted posteriorly to the rest, large eye (41-45 % HL), first anal-fin ray inserted anterior to last dorsal-fin ray, high number of anal-fin rays (iv-vi, 25-29), and 37-39 perforated scales in lateral series.The large eye and the presence of 25-29 branched anal-fin rays differentiate the species from other Astyanax living in southern South America.
Article
Full-text available
Astyanax eremus, a new species of geographically isolated characid fish, is described from a small tributary of the upper rio Iguaçu basin. The new species belongs to the Astyanax scabripinnis species complex and is easily distinguished from its congeners included in this group by its allometric growth of the mouth, which goes from terminal in young individuals to sub-terminal mouth in larger specimens. Additionally, the new species is distinguished by meristic and morphometric characters. Astyanax eremus presents an evident polymorphism on the traditional character "number of teeth in inner premaxillary row". Comments about that character are provided. Astyanax eremus, uma espécie nova de caracídeo geograficamente isolada, é descrita de um pequeno tributário da bacia do alto rio Iguaçu. A espécie nova pertence ao complexo de espécies Astyanax scabripinnis e é facilmente distinguível dos congêneres deste grupo por apresentar desenvolvimento alométrico da boca, a qual passa de terminal nos indivíduos jovens a subterminal nos maiores. Além disso, a espécie nova é diagnosticada por caracteres merísticos e morfométricos. Astyanax eremus apre-senta um acentuado polimorfismo do tradicional caráter "número de dentes da série interna do pré-maxilar". Uma discussão a respeito deste caráter é apresentada.
Article
Full-text available
Astyanax obscurus and A. laticeps are redescribed. Both species were originally described from the laguna dos Patos system, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The deepest and most robust body area close to the middle of the pectoral fins length, robust head, snout short and abrupt, body depth smaller than 41% of SL, reduced number of branched anal-fin rays, presence of one or two humeral spots, and a dark midlateral body stripe extending to the tip of the middle caudal-fin rays include both in the A. scabripinnis species complex. The presence of two humeral spots (vs. one), external row of the premaxillary with pentacuspid teeth (vs. tricuspid), and absence of bony hooks in all fins in males (vs. presence in anal and ventral fins) distinguish A. obscurus from A. laticeps. These species distinguish from species of this complex by meristic and morphometric characters and color pattern. An identification key for the species of genus occurring in the laguna dos Patos system is presented.