Future human exploration missions to Mars are being studied by NASA and industry. Several approaches to the Mars mission are being examined that use various types of propulsion for the different phases of the mission. The choice and implementation of propulsion system options can significantly impact mission performance in terms of trip time, spacecraft mass, and mission abort capability for the crew. Understanding the trajectory requirements relative to the round-trip Earth to Mars mission opportunities in the 2030’s, and beyond, that set the design of the Mars crew vehicle is important in order to determine the impact of key propulsion choices. Additionally some propulsion and propellant choices for the crew vehicle can enable mission abort trajectories while others will not.
Nuclear Thermal propulsion (NTP) with 900 seconds and higher specific impulse (Isp) can permit the capability to abort back to Earth at several opportunities during the outbound or return trajectory that regular low Isp chemical propulsion cannot. Abort scenarios after the Mars crew vehicle has been injected along the path to Mars have been studied as well as timing of fly-by aborts to quickly return crew to Earth.
These trajectory studies are based off missions NASA defined during the Evolvable Mars Campaign (EMC) with crew going to Mars in 2033, 2037, 2043 and 2048. Detailed trajectory analysis was performed with the NASA Copernicus program for the several crew missions that were in the EMC. The goal was to determine how the heliocentric trajectory elements change and determine the “abort trajectory” impulse requirements. The NTP Mars crew vehicles studied had propellant loads sized for either Trans-Mars Injection (TMI), Mars Orbit Capture (MOC), Trans-Earth Injection (TEI), and Earth Orbit Capture (EOC) or just TMI and MOC with TEI and EOC pre-positioned as was done in the EMC chemical crew vehicle architecture.
The impulse requirements were then compared to the remaining impulse capability after TMI for the architecture’s remaining propellant load for the baseline 2033, 2037, 2043, and 2048 crew vehicle concepts. Abort scenarios that were studied included fast returns some number of days after TMI as well as fly-by aborts using available propellants (e.g., main propulsion system (MPS) and reaction control system (RCS)). The NTP system in this study shows great promise for adding mission flexibility via abort trajectories to Mars and at Mars.