ArticlePDF Available

BIOSYSTEMATIC APPROACH: TO INVENTORIZATION OF UBIQUITIOUS MYIASIS CAUSING FLIES OF VETERINARY IMPORTANCE IN INDIA

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Dipterans are a diverse order of insect of which Calliphorids and Sarcophagids are the most ubiquitous, as several species of these families immature stages have been known to cause a deleterious condition of human and animal tissue, viz., collectively termed as myiasis. Therefore it is essential to gather information and to setup a biosystematic species inventory on the common and most ubiquitous myiasis causers along with their synonyms and notes on type localities to generate information about their distribution and substrate preferences for causing myiasis. The current study reveals, a total of 21 species of flies which are responsible for causing myiasis in India, out of which 17 species cause myiasis in animals, out of which 8 species belong to the family Calliphoridae and 9 species belong to the family Sacrophagidae, respectively. The present study provides a synopsis of the regional biosystematic and taxonomical work carried out until now, and can serve as a baseline data for future studies.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Research in: Agricultural & Vet. Sci.
Vol.1, No.2, 2017, pp.116-134
116
BIOSYSTEMATIC APPROACH: TO INVENTORIZATION OF
UBIQUITIOUS MYIASIS CAUSING FLIES OF VETERINARY
IMPORTANCE IN INDIA
Abesh Chakraborty1*, Goutam Kumar Saha2, Dhriti Banerjee1
1Zoological Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change
(MoEF & CC, Government of India), Kolkata, India
2Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India
Abstract. Dipterans are a diverse order of insect of which Calliphorids and Sarcophagids are the most
ubiquitous, as several species of these families immature stages have been known to cause a deleterious
condition of human and animal tissue, viz., collectively termed as myiasis. Therefore it is essential to
gather information and to setup a biosystematic species inventory on the common and most ubiquitous
myiasis causers along with their synonyms and notes on type localities to generate information about their
distribution and substrate preferences for causing myiasis. The current study reveals, a total of 21 species
of flies which are responsible for causing myiasis in India, out of which 17 species cause myiasis in
animals, out of which 8 species belong to the family Calliphoridae and 9 species belong to the family
Sacrophagidae, respectively. The present study provides a synopsis of the regional biosystematic and
taxonomical work carried out until now, and can serve as a baseline data for future studies.
Keywords: medico-legal entomology, Myiasis, Calliphoridae, Sacrophagidae, India.
Corresponding Author: Abesh, Chakraborty, Zoological Survey of India, Ministry of Environment,
Forests & Climate Change (Government of India), M Block, New Alipore, Kolkata-700 053, India, Mob:
990342474, e-mail: abeshc1@gmail.com
Manuscript received: 19 April 2017
1. Introduction
India is one of the world’s most biodiverse regions with a total area of about
3,287,263 km2. The faunal diversity of India is rich and diversified because of a variety
of ecozones ranging from deserts to high mountains and tropical to temperate forests.
The Indian myiasis causers, especially the family Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae has
been poorly known as most species were described in the 19th century; apart from
treatment by (Senior White et al, 1940) [77].
This taxonomically and medico legally important faunal group have been
neglected till date. The study indicates that most of the species have been collected in
selected regions of India, typically from West Bengal. The term "myiasis," was
introduced by Hope in 1840, is now in general use to indicate the condition resulting
from the invasion of tissues or organs of man or animals by dipterous larvae. Somewhat
earlier; Kirby and Spence, had proposed the name "scolechiasis" for such invasions by
insect larvae in general. Hope proposed to limit the term "scolechiasis" by proposing
"myiasis" for dipteran larvae; "scolechiasis" for lepidopterous larvae and "canthariasis"
for coleopteran larvae [17].
Patton in 1921 extended the use of the term myiasis to include all stages of Diptera
including that eggs, pupae, and even adults may occasionally be found in the human or
A. CHAKRABORTY et al.: BIOSYSTEMATIC CHECKLIST OF MYIASIS CAUSING
117
animal body. Thus the need for a species inventory or a general guide to the subject
became evident, only after the progress of World War II in Europe and America [42,
43]. But no such study was conducted in India.
The family Calliphoridae and Sacrophagidae flies are the most ubiquitous due to
their trade mark appearance on wounds and dead bodies. The family Calliphoridae is
represented currently in the world by 1,520 species and out of which 59 species has
been recorded from India and the family Sacrophagidae is represented currently in the
world by 3,079 species and out of which 126 species are recorded from India [33, 34].
The current interest in these flies is due to the fact that these flies wreck havoc on
cattle health, by both in terms of product quality and quantity, viz., deterioting cattle
biomass there by tremendously reducing the quantity and quality of meat, milk, wool
and leather in ungulates. Therefore the current study is important in the fact that it will
provide a list of all the myiasis causing flies of the two most ubiquitous groups, which
are taxonomically distinctly different but ecologically similar on basis of utilization of
similar resources.
The current study focuses on the generation of base line data for India, which is so
far not been attempted yet and this will seemingly be the pioneering study to generate a
species inventory of myiasis causing Calliphorids and Sarcophagids in India of
veterinary importance, also synonyms are given to avoid misidentification and
distribution is given in this biosystematic checklist.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Status survey
Taxonomic nomenclature used for the checklist follows (Evenhius, 2014). Indian
distribution and elsewhere are also given; along with synonyms of the species. The
study is based on the available literature rather than on extensive new taxonomic work.
Most of the names of the described species presented are in accordance with the most
recent Stratiomyidae classification following Systema Dipterorum (Woodley, 2001 and
Pape and Evenhuis, 2013).
2.2. Museum survey
Dipterans collected from tissues of animals (adults and/or immature) and stored in
the repository of National Zoological Collection in the Zoological Survey of India,
Kolkata, were studied and utilized for the preparation of the checklist. The registration
numbers of the flies are from 2080/H6 to 2364/H6, 2374/H6 to 4140/H6, 4321/H6 to
4647/H6 and 6935/H6 to 7836/H6.
2.3. Literature survey
Taxonomic literatures were reviewed for extracting out Indian species of the
medico-legally important dipteran from internet resources and other relevant literatures
such as Catalog of Life (updated on September, 2016) [55], Systema Dipterorum
(updated on June, 2013) [40], Oriental catalog [28], Fauna of British India [77] and
Catalog of Diptera from Australasian and Oceania regions [10], Zoo records series
(2011 to 2016) and State fauna series and Open search for papers on myiasis causing
dipterans and allied disciplines from the Internet, were consulted for extraction of the
RESEARCH IN: AGRICULTURAL & VET. SCI., V.1, N.2, 2017
118
current taxonomic position of the myiasis causing species, for the preparation of
biosystematic inventory and proper in-hand identification of the specimens as all the
synonyms are clubbed under the current taxonomically accepted name, their
biogeographic distribution and thereby ultimately curving all these data into the first of
its kind checklist of Indian dipteran species of medico legal (veterinary) interest, the
work, especially mentions the species from West Bengal. Besides this other major
contributors of the field along with their contributions are cited and current status of the
Indian variety is elucidated along with survey locations.
2.4. Descriptive statistics
Basic numerical taxonomy a classification system in biological systematics which
deals with the grouping by numerical methods of taxonomic units based on their
character. It aims to create a taxonomy using numeric algorithms like cluster analysis
rather than using subjective evaluation of their properties. This is achieved by dividing
on criteria basis and utilizing graphs to visualize data [69]. This will gave us an idea of
the types of groups that are encountered due to substrate preference.
2.5. Biometric analysis and AHC
Previous collections (from National Zoological Collection, General Diptera
Collection were taken) and microscopic measurements of the genital capsules of the
various specimens of these myiasis causing flies were undertaken in Lecia M 205 and
Lecia EZ4 HD microscopes. Based on the body biometrics (length of genital capsule of
n = 10 individuals of each species) and current nomenclature AHC was done to see
relation between the various levels of taxa to assess phylogenetic relationships between
species, using the length of genital capsule. This method uses comparative statistical
analyses that assumes the independence of data points and phylogenetically independent
contrasts (Felsenstein, 1984), in Wards method [3, 12, 16, 14, 27, 30].
3. Results
The list is arranged systematically to subgenus and genus level and alphabetically
thereafter, to make the search easier for a given taxon. Main references to the original
distribution and host preference are listed. The acronyms used for collections follow the
standard of the Systema Dipterorum (Woodley, 2001 and Pape and Evenhuis, 2013),
and their equivalents are as follows; Calliphora (Calliphora) vicina Robineau-
Desvoidy, 1830: CV; Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann, 1830) : LC; Lucilia illustris
(Meigen, 1826): LI; Lucilia sericata (Meigen, 1826) : LS ; Chrysomya albiceps
(Wiedemann, 1819): CA; Chrysomya bezziana Villeneuve, 1914 : CB; Chrysomya
megacephala (Fabricius, 1794): CM; Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart, 1843): CR;
Wohlfahrtia nuba (Wiedemann, 1830):WN; Sarcophaga (Bellieria) melanura Meigen,
1826: SBM; Sarcophaga (Liopygia) argyrostoma (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830):SLA;
Sarcophaga (Liopygia) ruficornis (Fabricius, 1794): SLR; Sarcophaga (Liosarcophaga)
dux Thomson, 1869: SLD; Sarcophaga (Parasarcophaga) albiceps (Meigen, 1826)
SPA; Sarcophaga (Parasarcophaga) hirtipes (Wiedemann, 1830): SPH; Sarcophaga
(Parasarcophaga) macroauriculata (Ho,1932): SPM; Sarcophaga (Parasarcophaga)
misera (Walker,1849): SP.
A. CHAKRABORTY et al.: BIOSYSTEMATIC CHECKLIST OF MYIASIS CAUSING
119
Checklist of myiasis causing flies of India (based on immature stage
development model)
ORDER Diptera (Linnaeus, 1758)
SUBORDER Brachycera (Macquart, 1834)
INFRAORDER Muscomorpha (Woodley, 1989)
SECTION Schizophora (Becher, 1882)
SUB SECTION Calyptratae (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830)
SUPER FAMILY Oestroidea (Leach, 1815)
FAMILY Calliphoridae (Brauer & Bergenstamm, 1889)
SUB FAMILY Calliphorinae Brauer & Bergenstamm 1889
TRIBE Calliphorini Lopes, 1968
GENUS Calliphora Robineau-Desvoidy
SUB GENUS Calliphora Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
1. Calliphora (Calliphora) vicina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830.
Distribution in India: Chandīgarh (Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Haryāna (Singh & Sidhu,
2004), Himāchal Pradesh (Bharti & Singh B., 2017; Singh & Sidhu, 2004), [Shimla
(Senior-White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940; Sinha & Nandi, 2004)], Punjab (Aggarwal,
2005; Bharti & Singh B., 2017; Bharti & Singh D., 2002; Singh & Bharti, 2000; Singh
& Sidhu, 2004), Sikkim (Senior-White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940; Singh & Sidhu, 2004)
[Mangan, Phensang (Sinha & Nandi, 2004)], Uttaranchal (Singh & Sidhu, 2004) [Dehra
Dun (Senior-White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940); Nainital (Sinha & Nandi, 2004)], Uttar
Pradesh [Mussooree (Senior-White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940)], Cherat? (Senior-White,
Aubertin & Smart, 1940)] West Bengal (Singh & Sidhu, 2004) [Alipurduar, Birpara,
Darjeeling, Ghoramara I., Kalimpong, Kurseong, Rajabhatkhawa (Sinha & Nandi,
2004); Sundarbans Biosphere Reserve (Sinha, Ghosh & Nandi, 2002; Sinha & Nandi,
2004)].
Host: Sheep (14). TRIBE Luciliini Shannon 1924
GENUS Lucilia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
2. Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann, 1830).
Synonyms
Lucilia amica Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
Lucilia argyricephala Macquart, 1846
Lucilia dorsalis Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
Lucilia elegans Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
Lucilia leucodes Frauenfeld, 1867
Lucilia nigricornis Senior-White, 1924
Lucilia pseudosericata Gaminara, 1930
Lucilia pubens Macquart, 1843
Lucilia usta Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
Musca fucina Walker, 1849
Musca serenissima Walker, 1853
Musca temperata Walker, 1853
Musca varians Wiedemann, 1830
Phaenicia pallescens Shannon, 1924
RESEARCH IN: AGRICULTURAL & VET. SCI., V.1, N.2, 2017
120
Somomya pallifrons Bigot, 1877
Strongyloneura nigricornis Senior-White, 1924
Distribution in India: Assam [Sadiya], Arunachal Pradesh [Pasighat], Chandīgarh
(Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Haryāna (Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Himachal Pradesh [Shimla],
Jammu & Kashmir [Gulmarg], Rajastan (Singh & Sidhu, 2004; Singh & Singh, 2002),
Sikkim [Jorethang] (Senior-White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940), Karnataka (Valandikar,
1982), West Bengal (Aloke, Roy & Dasgupta, 1989; Singh & Sidhu, 2004) [Burdwan,
Coochbehar, Dhabalhat, Shibpur, Rajabhatkhawa, Ranaghat, Shibpur Botanical Garden
(Sinha & Nandi, 2004)].
Host: Sheep (22).
3. Lucilia illustris (Meigen, 1826).
Distribution in India: Haryāna (Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Himachal Pradesh (Senior-
White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940; Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Punjab (Bharti, 2009; Shah &
Sakhawat, 2004; Singh & Bharti, 2000; Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Uttaranchal (Singh &
Sidhu, 2004; Singh & Singh, 2002).
Host: Canine (foxes and dogs).
4. Lucilia sericata (Meigen, 1826).
Synonyms
Pyenosonia sericata (Meigen, 1826).
Lucilia barberi Townsend, 1908
Lucilia capensis Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
Lucilia flavipennis Macquart, 1843
Lucilia frontalis Brauer & Bergenstamm, 1891
Lucilia giraulti Townsend, 1908
Lucilia lagyra Walker, 1849
Lucilia latifrons Schiner, 1861
Lucilia pruniosa Meigen, 1838
Lucilia sayi Jaennicke, 1867
Musca lagyra Walker, 1849
Musca nobilis Meigen, 1826
Musca tegularia Wiedemann, 1830
Phaenicia concinna Robineau-Desvoidy, 1863
Distribution in India: Almost throughout India” (Sinha, 2014), Himachal Pradesh
(Bharti & Singh B., 2017), Jharkhand (Sinha, 2014), Punjab (Senior-White, Aubertin &
Smart, 1940; Singh & Singh, 2002), West Bengal [Bamankhali, Darjeeling, Ganga
Sagar, Ghoramara I., Kalimpong, Malda, Siliguri, Sukna, Takvar (Sinha & Nandi,
2004)]
Host: Sheep (22).
SUB FAMILY Chrysomyinae Roback, 1951
TRIBE Chrysomyini Shannon 1923
GENUS Chrysomya Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
5. Chrysomya albiceps (Wiedemann, 1819).
Synonyms
Chrysomyia indica Patton, 1934
Compsomyia flaviceps Seguy, 1927
A. CHAKRABORTY et al.: BIOSYSTEMATIC CHECKLIST OF MYIASIS CAUSING
121
Compsomyia mascarenhasi Seguy, 1927
Lucilia arcuata Macquart, 1851
Lucilia testaceifacies Macquart, 1851
Musca bibula Wiedemann, 1830
Musca elara Walker, 1849
Musca emoda Walker, 1849
Musca felix Walker, 1853
Musca himella Walker, 1849
Paracompsomyia verticalis Adams, 1905
Somomyia annulata Brauer, 1899
Somomyia arussica Corti, 1895
Somomyia nubiana Bigot, 1877
Distribution in India: Kerala (Radhakrishnan et al., 2012), Punjab (Bharti, 2014),
Uttaranchal (Singh & Singh, 2002), West Bengal (Sinha, Mondal & Mahato, 2016).
Host: Bovine (22).
6. Chrysomya bezziana Villeneuve, 1914.
Distribution in India: widespread (Bharti, 2014; James, 1947; Chhabra & Pathak,
2008; Krajewski, Allen, Hoss, Patel & Chandawarkar, 2009; Lane & Crosskey, 1993;
Norris & Murray, 1964; Singh & Singh, 2002; Sood, Kakar & Wattal, 1976; Verves,
2005), ); Andhra Pradesh (Norris & Murray, 1964): Kadapa (Kumar, 2012), Assam
(Nene et al. 2015), Calicut (Joseph et al., 2014), Chandīgarh (Singh & Sidhu, 2004),
Chhattisgarh (Norris & Murray, 1964), Dadra & Nagar Haveli (Norris & Murray,
1964), Delhi (Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Goa (Internet state fauna series), Haryana (Kumar
& Ruprah, 1984), Himāchal Pradesh (Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Jammu (Katoch et al.,
2014), Karnataka (Norris & Murray, 1964; Sharma, A. & Hedge, 2010), Kerala (Norris
& Murray, 1964; Radhakrishnan et al., 1994, 2012), Madhya Pradesh (Norris &
Murray, 1964; Thomas, Nair, Hegde & Kulkarni, 2010), Maharashtra (Kulkarni et al.,
2012; Norris & Murray, 1964): Puna (Sowani et al., 2004), New Delhi (Sachdev,
Kumar, Roop, Arora & Dada, 1990), Odisha [=Orissa] (Norris & Murray, 1964),
Pondicherry (Gopalakrishnan, Srinivasan, Saxena & Shanmugapriya, 2008;
Radhakrishnan et al., 1994), Punjab (Singh, A. & Sing, D. 2007; Singh, A. & Sing, D.
2006, 2007, 2016; Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Rajasthan (Internet), Tamil Nadu (David,
Rupa, Mathai & Nair, 1996; Gopalakrishnan, Srinivasan, Saxena & Shanmugapriya,
2008; Norris & Murray, 1964; Sankari & Ramakrishnan, 2010), Uttar Pradesh
(Aggarwal et al., 2014; Ahamd & Khan, 2012; Husain, A., Husain, S., Malaviya &
Bahadur, 1993; Rathore et al., 2016; Sharma, Dayal & Agrawal, 1989), West Bengal
(Norris & Murray, 1964).
Host: Bovine (16, 17, 18, 19).
7. Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 1794).
Synonyms
Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 1794).
Pyenosonia flaviceps (Berg)
Lucilia flaviceps Macquart, 1843
Chrysomya duvaucelii Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
Chrysomya gratiosa Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
Lucilia flaviceps Macquart, 1843
RESEARCH IN: AGRICULTURAL & VET. SCI., V.1, N.2, 2017
122
Musca bata Walker, 1849
Musca combrea Walker, 1849
Musca dux Eschscholtz, 1822
Musca remuria Walker, 1849
Pollenia basalis Smith, 1876
Somomya cyaneocincta Bigot, 1888
Somomya pfefferi Bigot, 1877
Somomyia cyaneocincta Bigot, 1887
Somomyia dives Bigot, 1887
Somomyia saffranea Bigot, 1877
Distribution in India: Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar (Sinha, 2014), Calcutta (Das
et al., 1978), Chandīgarh (Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Delhi (Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Haryāna
(Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Himāchal Pradesh (Bharti & Singh, 2017; Singh & Sidhu, 2004;
Verves, 2005), Jammu & Kashmīr (Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Jharkhand (Sinha, 2014;
Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Karnataka (Valandikar, 1982), Kerala (Bharti & Singh, 2017),
Maharashtra (Abd-AlGalil & Zambare, 2015), Meghalaya, Orissa (Sinha, 2014), Punjab
(Aggarwal, 2005; Bharti & Singh B., 2017; Bharti & Singh D., 2002; Singh & Bharti,
2000; Singh & Singh, 2002; Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Rājasthān (Singh & Sidhu, 2004),
Sikkim (Sinha, 2014), Tamil Nadu (Ramaraj et al., 2014; Sinha, 2014), Tripura (Datta
& Parui, 2000; Sinha, 2014), Uttaranchal (Singh & Sidhu, 2004), West Bengal (Aloke,
Roy & Dasgupta, 1989; Dey, Bhattacharya, Pal, Das & Pal, 2012; Mondal, Biswas,
Banerji, Bose, Biswas & Mandal, 2014; Mondal, Mahato, Chakraborty. & Sinha, 2015;
Sinha, Mondal & Mahato, 2016) [Sundarbans Biosphere Reserve (Sinha, Ghosh &
Nandi, 2002); Alipurduar, Bamankhali, Begnakhali, Bijanbari, Chandanpiri, Ghoramara
I., Jaigaon, Kalyani, Kurseong, Madarihat, Panitanki, Rajabhatkhawa, Ranaghat,
Shibpur, Singala Bazar, Siliguri (Sinha & Nandi, 2004)].
Host: Animal, generally canine (25).
8. Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart, 1843).
Distribution in India: Andaman Is. (Sinha, 2014), Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal
Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Chandīgarh (Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Goa, Haryāna (Singh &
Sidhu, 2004), Himāchal Pradesh (Singh & Sidhu, 2004; Verves, 2005), Jammu &
Kashmīr (Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Jharkhand (Sinha, 2014), Karnataka, Kerala (Bharti &
Singh, 2017), Madhya Pradesh (Verves, 2005), Maharashtra (Abd-AlGalil, F. M. A.
& Zambare, S. P., 2015; Verves, 2005), Manipur, Meghalaya, Nagaland (Verves, 2005),
Nicobar Is. (Sinha, 2014), Orissa, Pondicherry, Punjab (Aggarwal, 2005; Bharti &
Singh, 2017; Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Rājasthān (Singh & Sidhu, 2004), Sikkim (Sinha,
2014), Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh (Vernma, 2013), Uttaranchal (Singh &
Sidhu, 2004), West Bengal (Aloke, Roy & Dasgupta, 1989; Séguy, 1941; Singh &
Singh, 2002) [Sundarbans Biosphere Reserve (Sinha, Ghosh & Nandi, 2002);
Alipurduar, Bamankhali, Begnakhali, Bijanbari, Chandanpiri, Ghoramara I., Jaigaon,
Kalyani, Kurseong, Madarihat, Panitanki, Rajabhatkhawa, Ranaghat, Shibpur, Singala
Bazar, Siliguri (Sinha & Nandi, 2004)].
Host: Sheep (22).
SUBORDER Brachycera (Macquart, 1834)
INFRAORDER Muscomorpha (Woodley, 1989)
A. CHAKRABORTY et al.: BIOSYSTEMATIC CHECKLIST OF MYIASIS CAUSING
123
SECTION Schizophora (Becher, 1882)
SUB SECTION Calyptratae (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830)
SUPER FAMILY Oestroidea (Leach, 1815)
FAMILY Sarcophagidae Haliday, 1853
GENUS Wohlfahrtia Brauer & Bergenstamm, 1889
9. Wohlfahrtia nuba (Wiedemann, 1830)
Synonyms
Tachina nuba Wiedemann, 1830
Wohlfahrtia volucris Seguy, 1941
Wohlfahrtia nuba Rohdendrof, 1956
Distribution India: Punjab (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Pape, 1996; Verves, 1985),
Rajastan (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002).
Host: Bovine and Canine (29).
SUB FAMILY Sarcophaginae Schiner 1861
GENUS Sarcophaga Meigen, 1826
SUB GENUS Bellieria Robineau-Desvoidy 1863
10. Sarcophaga (Bellieria) melanura Meigen, 1826
Synonyms
Sarcophaga melanura Meigen, 1826
Distribution India: Bihar (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Verves, 2001), Jammu & Kashmir
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Rohdendorf, 1937), Tamil Nadu (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001).
Host: Avian, Bovine and Canine (12, 13, 23).
SUB GENUS Liopygia Enderlein, 1928
11. Sarcophaga (Liopygia) argyrostoma (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830)
Synonyms
Sarcophaga barbata Thomson, 1869
Distribution India: Gujarat (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001),
Haryana (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Maharashtra (Khan, L.,
Zambare & Fahd, 2016), Rajasthan (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves,
2001), Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves,
2001).
Host: Sheep (12, 13).
12. Sarcophaga (Liopygia) ruficornis (Fabricius, 1794)
Synonyms
Parasarcophaga ruficornis (Fabricius, 1794)
Distribution India: Andaman Is. (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves,
2001), Andhra Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Assam
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Bihar (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Dādra and Nagar Haveli (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi,
2002; Verves, 2001), Dehli (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Goa
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Gujarat (Chakraborty et al.,
RESEARCH IN: AGRICULTURAL & VET. SCI., V.1, N.2, 2017
124
2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Haryana (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002;
Verves, 2001), Himachal Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves,
2001), Karnataka (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Kerala
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Lakshadweep Is. (Chakraborty
et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Madhya Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Maharashtra (Abd-Algalil, Zambare & Mashaly, 2016;
Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Manipur (Chakraborty et al.,
2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Meghalaya (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002;
Verves, 2001), Mizoram (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001),
Nagaland (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Orissa (Chakraborty et
al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Pondicherry (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi,
2002; Verves, 2001), Punjab (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Rohdendorf, 1930;
Singh, A. & Singh, D., 2016; Verves, 2001), Rajastan (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi,
2002; Verves, 2001), Tamil Nadu (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves,
2001), Uttar Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), West
Bengal (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001): Sundarbans Biosphere
Reserve (Sinha, Ghosh & Nandi, 2002).
Host: Dog & Poultry, Bufo melanostictus (12, 13, 22, 29).
SUB GENUS Liosarcophaga Enderlein, 1928
13. Sarcophaga (Liosarcophaga) dux Thomson, 1869
Synonyms
Sarcophaga dux. var harpax Pandelle,1896
Sarcophaga subtuberosa Parker,1917
Distribution India: Andaman Is. (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves,
2001), Andhra Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001),
Arunachal Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Assam
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 1982, 2002; Verves, 2001), Bihar (Chakraborty et al.,
2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Chandigarh (Verves, 2001), Delhi (Chakraborty et
al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Goa (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002;
Verves, 2001), Gujarat (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Jammu
& Kashmir (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Karnataka
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Kerala (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Lakshadweep (Chakraborty et al., 2017), Madhya Pradesh
(Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Maharashtra (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Fahd & Zambare
2016; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Manipur (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002;
Verves, 2001), Meghalaya (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001),
Mizoram (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Nagaland
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Orissa (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Punjab (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves,
2001), Rajastan (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Tamil Nadu
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Tripura (Chakraborty et al.,
2017; Datta & Parui, 2000), Uttar Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002;
Verves, 2001), West Bengal (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001):
Sundarbans Biosphere Reserve (Sinha, Ghosh & Nandi, 2002).
A. CHAKRABORTY et al.: BIOSYSTEMATIC CHECKLIST OF MYIASIS CAUSING
125
Host: Bovine (Cows, Camels and Bullocks) (12, 13, 22).
SUB GENUS Parasarcophaga Johnston &Tiegs, 1921
14. Sarcophaga (Parasarcophaga) albiceps (Meigen, 1826)
Distribution India: Andaman Is. (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves,
2001), Andhra Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Senior-White, Aubertin
& Smart, 1940; Verves, 2001), Arunachal Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi,
2002; Senior-White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940; Verves, 2001), Assam (Chakraborty et
al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Senior-White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940; Verves, 2001), Bihar
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Senior-White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940; Verves,
2001), Chandigarh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002), Dādra & Nagar Haveli
(Nandi, 2002), Damān and Diu (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002), Delhi
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Goa (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Gujarat (Chakraborty et al., 2017), Haryana (Chakraborty
et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Himachal Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Jammu & Kashmir (Verves, 2001; Nandi, 2002),
Jharkhand (Sinha, 2014), Karnataka (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves,
2001), Kerala (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Laccadive Is.
(Parui & Datta, 1991; Verves, 2001; Nandi, 2002), Madhya Pradesh (Chakraborty et al.,
2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Maharashtra (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002;
Verves, 2001), Manipur (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001),
Meghalaya (Verves, 2001; Nandi, 2002), Mizoram (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi,
2002; Verves, 2001), Nagaland (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001),
Nicobar Is. (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Orissa (Chakraborty
et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Pondicherry (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi,
2002), Punjab (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Rajastan
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Sikkim (Chakraborty et al.,
2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Tamil Nadu (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002;
Verves, 2001), Tripura (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Datta & Parui, 2000; Nandi, 2002;
Verves, 2001), Uttar Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001),
West Bengal (Aloke, Roy & Dasgupta, 1989; Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 1982a, b,
2002; Verves, 2001) [Sundarbans Biosphere Reserve (Sinha, Ghosh & Nandi, 2002)]
Host: Bovine (Bull) (12, 13, 22).
15. Sarcophaga (Parasarcophaga) hirtipes (Wiedemann, 1830)
Synonyms
Sarcophaga hirtipes.var orchidea Bottcher,1913
Distribution India: Andaman Is. (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves,
2001), Andhra Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Bihar
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Delhi (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Gujarat (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves,
2001), Haryana (Nandi, 2002; Pape, 1996; Verves, 2001), Jharkhand (Sinha, 2014),
Karnataka (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Kerala (Chakraborty
et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Madhya Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Maharashtra (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002;
Verves, 2001), Manipur (Verves, 2001), Mizoram (Verves, 2001), Nagaland (Verves,
RESEARCH IN: AGRICULTURAL & VET. SCI., V.1, N.2, 2017
126
2001), Orissa (Sinha, 2014), Punjab (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves,
2001), Rajastan (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Tamil Nadu
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 1988, 2002; Verves, 2001), Tripura (Sinha, 2014),
Uttar Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 1990, 2002; Verves, 2001), West
Bengal (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Joseph & Pauri, 1980; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001).
Host: Sheep (12, 13).
16. Sarcophaga (Parasarcophaga) macroauriculata (Ho,1932)
Distribution India: Manipur (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001),
Meghalaya (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Nagaland
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Sikkim (Chakraborty et al.,
2017; Nandi, 1990, 2002; Verves, 2001), Uttar Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 1990, 2002; Verves, 2001), West Bengal (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Dasgupta,
Roy & Guin, 1972; Nandi, 2002; Senior-White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940; Verves,
2001).
Host: Feline (12, 13).
17. Sarcophaga (Parasarcophaga) misera (Walker,1849)
Distribution India: Andaman Is. (Nandi, 2002), Andhra Pradesh (Chakraborty et al.,
2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Arunahal Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi,
2002; Verves, 2001), Assam (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001),
Bihar (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 1988, 2002; Verves, 2001), Chandigarh
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Dādra and Nagar Haveli (Nandi,
2002), Damān and Diu (Nandi, 2002), Delhi (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002;
Verves, 2001), Goa (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Gujarat
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 1992 a, b, 2002; Verves, 2001), Haryana (Chakraborty
et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Himachal Pradesh (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 1990 a, b, 2002; Verves, 2001), Jammu & Kashmir (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 1992 a, b, 2002; Verves, 2001), Jharkhand (Sinha, 2014), Karnataka
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Kerala (Chakraborty et al., 2017;
Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Laccadive Is. (Nandi, 2002), Madhya Pradesh
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Maharashtra (Chakraborty et al.,
2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Manipur (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002;
Verves, 2001), Meghalaya (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001),
Mizoram (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Nagaland
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Nicobar Is. (Sinha, 2014), Orissa
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Pondicherry (Nandi, 2002),
Punjab (Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Rajasthan (Chakraborty
et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Sikkim (Nandi, 2002), Tamil Nadu
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), Tripura (Chakraborty et al.,
2017; Datta & Parui, 2000; Nandi, 1992 a, b, 2002; Verves, 2001), Uttar Pradesh
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 1988, 1990 a, 2002; Verves, 2001), West Bengal
(Chakraborty et al., 2017; Nandi, 2002; Verves, 2001), [Sundarbans Biosphere Reserve
(Sinha, Ghosh & Nandi, 2002)].
Host: Domesticated & Poultry animals, sheep (12, 13).
A. CHAKRABORTY et al.: BIOSYSTEMATIC CHECKLIST OF MYIASIS CAUSING
127
Biometric analysis and AHC
The biometric data was run through AHC which yielded 5 distinctly different
groups, as specific biometric lengths points to specific substrate preference. As shown
below. The bovine sub group consisting of CV, LC, CS, CB, WN, SBM, SLD, SPA and
the feline sub group SPM, seems to have diverged from a common stock and the canine
sub group consist of LI, CM; the caprine and ovine sub group consist of
LS,CR,SLA,SPH and lastly the non specific sub group consists of SLR, SP.
CV LC CS CB WN SBM SLD SPA LI CM SLR SP
SPM LS CR SLA SPH
Bovine
group
Caprine and ovine
group
Canine
group
Feline
group
Non specific
group
Fig. 1. AHC of the Sarcophagids and Calliphorids of Veterinary importance in India
3. Conclusion
The current study shows that the genus Sarcophaga is the major contributor to
myiasis in India, as per previous literatures, as they amount for 44% (8 species) of the
myiasis cases in India. The genus Chrysomya and Lucilia seems to be 22% (4 species)
of the myiasis cases in India, as is the second largest contributor. The genus Wohlfahrtia
and Calliphora amounts for 6% (1 species) of the myiasis cases in India, as is the third
largest contributors, each cases of myiasis each in India (Fig.2, 3).
We show that the taxonomically less studied species designated as NMF (No
mention found) on sub genus is the largest contributor to myiasis in India, with an
astounding 44% (8 species), which re establishes the belief that taxonomic study along
with biosystematic studies are needed for generation of base line data for these myiasis
causing flies on the sub genus level. The sub genus Parasarcophaga amounts for 17% (3
species) of the myiasis cases in India, as is the second largest contributor. The sub genus
Liopygia amounts for 11% (2 species) each of the myiasis cases in India, as is the third
largest contributor. The sub genus Bellieria, Bercaea, Liosarcophaga and Prionophalla
amounts for 6% (1 species) each. The sub genus Squamatodes and Calliphora amounts
for 5% (1 species) each. (Fig. 4, 5).
RESEARCH IN: AGRICULTURAL & VET. SCI., V.1, N.2, 2017
128
Fig. 2. The % of Genus of various flies in their contribution to myiasis cases in India
Fig. 3. The number of species of Genus of various flies in their contribution to myiasis cases in India
6%
22%
22%
44%
Genus
Calliphora
Lucilia
Chrysomya
Wohlfahrtia
Sarcophaga
1
4
4
1
8
0
2
4
6
8
10
Calliphora
Lucilia
Chrysomya
Wohlfahrtia
Sarcophaga
No. of members
Genus
A. CHAKRABORTY et al.: BIOSYSTEMATIC CHECKLIST OF MYIASIS CAUSING
129
Fig. 4. The % of Genus of various flies in their contribution to myiasis cases in India
Fig. 5. The number of species of Sub genus of various flies in their contribution to myiasis
cases in India
5%
5%
6%
6%
11%
6%
17%
44%
SUB GENUS
Calliphora
Squamatodes
Bellieria
Bercaea
Liopygia
Liosarcophaga
Parasarcophaga
NMF
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
No. of members
SUB GENUS
RESEARCH IN: AGRICULTURAL & VET. SCI., V.1, N.2, 2017
130
Fig.6.a. Show the hosts and family of myiasis causers and their hosts in myiasis cases
Fig.6.b. The types of hosts and their substrate preference of the two families
It seems bovine is equally preferred for both families at 45% each, while ovine and
caprine is more preferred by Calliphoridae at 33%, than Sarcophagidae at 22%, canine
is specifically preferred by Calliphoridae at 22% and feline is specifically preferred by
Sarcophagidae at 11%, also Sarcophagidae at 22% of sometimes tend to be non specific
also, thereby showing flexibility in substrate utilization.
8
5
2
1
2
4
2
0
1
2
4
3
2
0
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
bovine
ovine &
caprine
canine
feline
NSG
No. of Species
Host
Host and family
TOTAL
SARCOPHAGIDAE
CALLIPHORIDAE
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Preference level
reference no. as per checklist
Heat map
amphibian
avian
canine
feline
caprine
ovine
bovine
A. CHAKRABORTY et al.: BIOSYSTEMATIC CHECKLIST OF MYIASIS CAUSING
131
Conflict of interest: None
Source of Funding: None
Acknowledgement. We authors are grateful to the Director of Zoological Survey of
India, Kolkata and Head of Dept. of Zoology, University of Calcutta, for providing the
infrastructural facilities to carry out the present work. And also to all the anonymous
reviewers for their constructive comments.
References
1. Aggarwal A., Daniel M.J., Shetty R.S. et al., (2014) Oral Myiasis Caused by Chrysomya
bezziana in Anterior Maxilla, Case Reports in Dentistry, 2014.
2. Aggarwal A.D., (2005) Estimating the postmortem interval with the help of entomological
evidence, Anil Aggrawal's Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 6.
3. Becker R.A., Chambers J.M., Wilks A.R., (1988) The new S language, Pacific Grove, Ca.:
Wadsworth & Brooks.
4. Bharti M., (2009) Studies on life cycles of forensically important flies, Calliphora vicina
and Musca domestica nebulo at different temperatures, J.Ent.Res., 33(3), 273-275.
5. Bharti M., (2014) The first record of Chrysomya chani Kurahashi, 1979 (Diptera:
Calliphoridae) from India, with a key to the known Indian species, Caucasian Entomol.
Bull, 10(2), 305-306.
6. Bharti M., Singh B., (2017) DNA-Based Identification of Forensically Important Blowflies
(Diptera: Calliphoridae) from India, Journal of Medical Entomology, 1-6.
7. Chhabra M.B., Pathak K.M.L., (2009) Myiasis of domestic animals andman in India, J.
Vet. Parasitol., 23, 1-7
8. Datta M., Parui P., Mukherjee M., (1997) State Fauna Series 3, Fauna of West Bengal,
Part 7, Insecta, Diptera, Rec. zoo!. Surv. India, 1-76.
9. Dey P.K., Bhattacharya T., Pal S.N., Das S., Pal S., (2012) Umbilical Myiasis in a
Newborn: a case report, Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal, 8(4), 42-45.
10. Evenhius N.L. [8th April 2016, 17th April 2016, 16th April 2016, 15th April 2016,15th
April 2016 and 16th April 2016] Family Calliphoridae, Sarcophagidae, Muscidae,
Phoridae, Psychodidae and Stratiomyidae, In: Evenhuis, N.L. (ed.), Catalog of the Diptera
of the Australasian and Oceanian Regions. (online version), Available at:
11. Evenhuis N.L., (2015) Family [family Calliphoridae, Sarcophagidae,]. In: Catalog of the
fossil flies of the world (Insecta: Diptera) website, Available at:
12. Felsenstein J., (1984) Distance methods for inferring phylogenies: a justification,
Evolution, 38(1), 16-24.
13. Gopalakrishnan S., Srinivasan R., Saxena S., Shanmugapriya J., (2008) Myiasis in different
types of carcinoma cases in southern India, Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 26,
189-192.
14. Gordon A.D., Classification, Second Edition, Chapman and Hall, C R C. London, 1999, 1-
45.
15. Hall D.G., (1948) Blowflies of North America, Thomas Say Foundation, London, 4, 477 p.
16. Hierarchical Clustering (v1.0.3) in Free Statistics Software (v1.1.23-r7), Office for
Research Development and Education, 2012. Available on: http://www.wessa.
Net/rwasp_hierarchicalclustering.wasp/
17. Hope F.W., (1840) On insects and their larvae occasionally found in the human body,
Trans. R. Soc. Entemol., 2, 256-271.
http://hbs.bishopmuseum.org/aocat/ Sacrophagidae, Calliphoridae.html (Last accessed:
[06/08/2016)].
http://hbs.bishopmuseum.org/fossilcat/[filename].html. Version [06/08/2016].
RESEARCH IN: AGRICULTURAL & VET. SCI., V.1, N.2, 2017
132
18. Husain A., Sreevatsa Malaviya A., Husain A., Bahadur A., (1993) Characterization of
microbial flora of leprous ulcers infested with maggots, Acta Leprologica, 8(6), 143-147.
19. Joseph B., Vyloppilli S., Ahsan A., Anirudhan A., (2014) Extreme oral myiasis, Saudi
Med. J., 35(9), 1133-1135.
20. Katoch R., Godara R., Yadav A., Sharma S., Ahmad I., (2014) Occurrence of Chrysomya
bezziana in a buffalo in Jammu, Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the
Indian Society for Parasitology, 38(4), 420-422.
21. Khan L.A., Zambare S.P., Abdalgalil F.M., (2016) First record of Sarcophagid Dipteran
Parasarcophaga (Thomsonea) argyrostoma from Maharastra State of India, Life Science
Leaflets, 77(2016), 52-64.
22. Krajewski A., Allen B., Hoss D., Patel C., Chandawarkar R.Y., (2009) Cutaneous myiasis,
J. Plast Reconst. Aest. Surg., 62, e-383-e386.
23. Kulkarni S., Joshi S., Bhalerao A., Chopde Y., Somalwar S., (2012) Myiasis: A boon or
bane? J. South Asian Feder. Obst. Gynae, 4(2), 116-117.
24. Kumar G.V., Sowmya G.S., Shivananda S., (2011) Chrysomya bezziana oral
myiasis, Journal of Global Infectious Diseases, 3(4), 393.
25. Kumar R., Ruprah N.S., (1984) Incidence and etiology of cutaneous myiasis in domestic
animals at Hissar [India], Indian Veterinary Journal.
26. Lane R.P., Crosskey R.W., (1993) Medical Insects and Arachnids, Chapman and Hall,
London.
27. McQuitty L.L., (1966) Similarity analysis by reciprocal pairs for discrete and continuous
data, Educational and Psychological measurement, 26(4), 825-831.
28. Mercedes D.D., Hardy D.E., (1977) A catalog of the Diptera of the Oriental Region,
Suborder Cyclorrhapha excluding Division Aschiza.
29. Mondal P.C., Mahato S., Chakraborty B., Sinha S.K., (2016) First report of Oriental latrine
flies causing vaginal myiasis in human, Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 40(4), 1243-1245.
30. Murtagh F., (1985) Multidimensional clustering algorithms, Compstat Lectures, Physica
Verlag.
31. Nandi B.C., (1982) Sarcophagid flies (Diptera : Sarcophagidae) from Sikkim, India, Rec.
Zool. Surv. India, 79, 457-461.
32. Nandi B.C., (1982) Sarcophagid flies from Asssm and Arunachal Pradesh, India, (Diptera:
Sarcopbagidae), Rec. Zool. Surv. India, 80, 117-126.
33. Nandi B.C., (2002) Fauna of India: Diptera: Sarcophagidae. Published by Zoological
Survey of India, 10, 270-274.
34. Nandi B.C., (2004) Checklist of Calliphoridae (Diptera) of India, Records of Zoological
Survey of India.
35. Nandi B.C., (2004) Checklist of Calliphoridae (Diptera) of India, Zoological Survey of
India.
36. Nandi B.C., Sinha S.K., (2004) On a small collection of muscid flies (Diptera: Muscidae)
of Sundarbans Biosphere Reserve, India, Rec. Zool. Surv. India, 102(1-2), 11-16.
37. Nene A.S., Mishra A., Dhand P., (2015) Ocular myiasis caused by Chrysomya bezziana a
case report, Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ), 9, 423-427.
doi:10.2147/OPTH.S79754.
38. Norris K.R., Murray M.D., (1964) Note on the screw worm fly, chrysomya bezziana,
(Diptera: Calliphoridae) as a pest of cattle in papua New Guinea, Technical Papers,
Division Entomology, CSIRO, Australia, 6.
39. Onorato R., (1922) Le miasi in Tripolitania, Arch Ital Sci Med Colon, 3(3), 14-315.
40. Pape, T., Thompson F.C., (2013) Systema Dipterorum, Version 1.0. Online at http://www.
diptera. org.
A. CHAKRABORTY et al.: BIOSYSTEMATIC CHECKLIST OF MYIASIS CAUSING
133
41. Patton W.S., (1920) Some notes on Indian Calliphorinae, Part 1. Chrysomyia bezziana, 17-
29.
42. Patton W.S., (1921) Notes on the Myiasis producing Diptera of Man and aninals,
Bui.Ent.Res., 12, 239-261.
43. Patton W.S., (1922) Some notes on Indian Calliphorinae “Additional cases of myiasis
caused by the larvae of Chrysomya bezziana Villeneuve together with the Diptera that
cause myiasis” in man and animals, Indian. Jour. Med. Res., 9, 654-682, illus.
44. Patton W.S., (1922) Some notes on Indian Calliphorinae VII, Additional cases of Myiasis
caused by the larvae of Chrysomya bezziana, In man and animals, Indian Jour. Med. Res.,
9, 654-682.
45. Perrot A. et al., (2015) Large interactive visualization of density functions on big data
infrastructure, 2015 IEEE 5th Symposium on Large Data Analysis and Visualization
(LDAV).
46. Povolny D., Verves Y.G., (1997) The flesh-flies of Central Europe (Insecta, Diptera,
Sarcophagidae), Spixiana Supplement 24.
47. Radhakrishnan R., Srinivasan S., Krishnamoorthy K., Sabesan S,. Pani S.P., (1994)
Myiasis in filarial lymphaedemea due to Chrysomya bezziana, National Med. J. India, 7,
117-118.
48. Radhakrishnan S., Gopalan A.K.K., Ravindran R., Rajagopal K., Sooryadas S., Promod
K., (2012) First record of Chrysomya albiceps Wiedemann, 1819 (Diptera: Calliphoridae)
maggots from a sambar deer (Rusa unicolor) in Kerala, South India, Journal of Parasitic
Diseases, 36(2), 280-282.
49. Radhakrishnan S., Kumar A., Gopalan K., Ravindran R., Rajagopal K., Sooryadas S.,
Promod K., (2012) First record of Chrysomya albiceps (Wiedemann) (Diptera:
Calliphoridae) maggots from a sambar deer, ( Rusa unicolor ) in Kerala, South India,
Journal Parasitology Diseases, 36, 280-282.
50. Ramaraj P., Selvakumar C., Ganesh A., Janarthanan S., (2014) Report on the occurrence of
synanthropic derived form of Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae) from
Royapuram fishing harbour, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, Biodiversity Data Journal, 2,
e1111.
51. Rathore B.S., Arora T., Krishna A., Bhatnagar A., (2015) Cutaneous myiasis complicating
basal cell carcinoma in a case of xeroderma pigmentosum, Indian J. Paediatr. Dermatol.,
16, 249-251.
52. Roback S.S., (1954) The evolution and taxonomy of the Sarcophaginae (Diptera,
Sarcophagidae), Illinois Biological Monograph 23, 1181.
53. Rohdendorf B.B., Verves Y.G., (1978) Sarcophaginae (Diptera, Sarcophagidae) from
Mongolia, In Annales historico-naturales Musei nationalis hungarici, 70, 241-258.
54. Rohdendorf, 1930 in Abesh Chakraborty, Garima Hora, Panchanan Parui, Goutam Kumar
Saha and Dhriti Banerjee, A Biosystematic species inventory of Indian Sarcophagidae
(Insecta: Diptera: Sarcophagidae), 2017, 5(1), 465-473.
55. Roskov Y., Abucay L., Orrell T., Nicolson D., Flann C., Bailly N., Kirk P., Bourgoin T.,
DeWalt R.E., Decock W., De Wever A., eds., (2016) Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of
Life, 2016 Annual Checklist, Digital resource at www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-che
cklist/2016. Species 2000: Naturalis, Leiden, the Netherlands. ISSN 2405-884X.
56. Roubaud E., (1914) Les Producteurs De Myiases Et Agents Bimilatbes Chez Lhomme et
les animaux, In Bouet, G. et Roubaud, E. . . . Etudes sur la Faune Parasitaire de l'Afrique
Occidentale Francaise. Fasc. 1 Paris.
57. Sachdev M.S., Kumar H., Jain A.K., Arora R., Dada V.K., (1990) Destructive ocular
myiasis in a noncompromised host, Indian J. Ophthalmol., 38, 184-6.
RESEARCH IN: AGRICULTURAL & VET. SCI., V.1, N.2, 2017
134
58. Sankari L.S., Ramakrishnan K., (2010) Oral myiasis caused by Chrysomya bezziana, J.
Oral Maxillofac. Pathol., JOMFP, 14(1), 16.
59. Seguy E., (1941) Moucches Parasites II, Encyclopedie Entomologique, Paris, 21, 1-436,
60. Shah Z.A, Sakhawat T., (2004) The effect of flesh age, trap colour, decomposition stage,
temperature and relative humidity on the visitation pattern of blow and flesh flies, Int. J.
Agri. Biol., 6(2), 370-374.
61. Sharma A., Hedge A., (2010) Primary oral myiasis due to Chrysomya bezziana treated with
Ivermectin, A case report, J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent., 34(3), 259-261.
62. Sharma H., Dayal D., Agrawal S.P., (1989) Nasal myiasis: review of 10 years experience,
J. Laryngol. Otol., 103, 489-491.
63. Siddiki S., Zambare S.P., (2017) Studies on Time Duration of Life Stages of Chrysomya
megacephala and Chrysomya rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) during Different Seasons,
J. Forensic. Res., 8, 379.
64. Singh A., Kaur J., (2016) Bioefficacy of crude extracts of Azadirachta indica (Meliaceae)
on survival and development of myiasis causing larvae of Chrysomya bezziana (Diptera:
Calliphoridae), Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 48, 117-124.
65. Singh A., Singh Z., (2015) Incidence of myiasis among humans-a review, Parasitology
Research, 114(9), 3183-3199.
66. Singh D., Sidhu I.S., (2004) A check list of blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) from North-
West of India, Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology, 24(1), 63-71.
67. Sinha K.S., Mondal P.C., Mahato S., (2016) Person Infected with Maggots of Banded
Blowfly Chrysomya albiceps and Latrine Fly Chrysomya megacephala RRJHCP, 2(1).
68. Sinha S.K., (2009) Sarcophagidae, Calliphoridae and Muscidae (Diptera) of the
Sundarbans Biosphere Reserve, West Bengal, India, Occasional Paper-Records of the
Zoological Survey of India, 308.
69. Sokal R.R., (1963) The Principles and Practice of Numerical Taxonomy, Taxon., 12(5),
190-199.
70. Sood V.P., Kakkar P.K., Wattal B.L., (1976) Myiasis in otorhinolaryn-gology with
entomological aspects, J. Larynagolotol., 90, 393-399.
71. Sowani A., Joglekar D., Kulkarni P., (2004) Maggots: A neglected problem in palliative
care, Indian J. Palliat. Care, 10, 27-9.
72. Strickland C., Roy D.N., (1940) Experimental intestinal myiasis, Indian Jour. Med. Res.,
28, 593-594.
73. Sutherst R.W., Spradbery J.P., Maywald G.F., (1989) The potential geographical
distribution of the Old World screw-worm fly, Chrysomya bessiziana, Medical and
Veterinary Entomolgy, 3, 273-280.
74. Thomas S., Nair P., Hegde K., Kulkarni A., (2010) Nasal myiasis with orbital and palatal
complications, BMJ Case Rep., 29, bcr0820103219.
75. Valandikar S.C., Hiregoudar L.S., (1991) A note on distribution of calliphorid, muscid and
sarcophagid flies in Karnataka, Current Research University of Agricultural Sciences
Bangalore, 20(2), 30-31.
76. Verma K., Forensic Entomology world: A new study on Chrysomya rufifacies from India,
Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 1(3), 125-141.
77. White R.S., Aubertin D., Smart J., (1940) Fauna of British India, Diptera. Vol. VI. Family
Calliphoridae, Fauna of British India, Diptera, Vol. VI. Family Calliphoridae., 6.
78. Zoo I. Surv. India, State Fauna Series 3, Fauna of West Bengal, Part-7, 163-224, 1997
Publisher, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta.
79. Zumpt F., (1965) Myiasis in man and animals in the old world, Butterworths, London, 267.
... Myiasis is a disease condition in which flies larvae (maggots) feed the living tissue and cells of the vertebrates. It has been found that about eighteen species belonging to five different genera including Calliphora spp. of order diptera caused myiasis in man and other vertebrates in India (Chakraborty et al., 2017). It is also reported that Calliphora vicina is causing facultative myiasis in animals (Bhagat, 2016;Chakraborty, et al., 2017). ...
... It has been found that about eighteen species belonging to five different genera including Calliphora spp. of order diptera caused myiasis in man and other vertebrates in India (Chakraborty et al., 2017). It is also reported that Calliphora vicina is causing facultative myiasis in animals (Bhagat, 2016;Chakraborty, et al., 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Calliphora Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Diptera: Calliphoridae: Calliphorinae), commonly called as blue bottleflies, are important because of their impact on human and animal health which inspired the authors to investigate the diversity, distribution and seasonal abundance of the fly species of Trans-Himalayan cold arid desert of Kargil-Ladakh, as the region has not been explored till date. Preliminarily two species of Calliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae) have been reported for the first time from the region; the reported species are identified as Calliphora vicina (Desvoidy) and Calliphora vomitoria (Linnaeus) and are well distributed throughout the study area. Total 770 flies were collected from the study area out of which Calliphora vicina was relatively contributed highest count (89.48%) then Calliphora vomitoria (10.51%). Whereas, seasonal abundance was highest recorded in August (59.67 ± 2.60) followed by September (54.00 ± 2.65) and least were recorded in April (1.66 ±1.66) and no flies were recorded
... These approaches may rapidly and correctly identify species and operate across several insect stages (Aly and Wen, 2013). As evidenced by related research, forensic entomological studies in India have grown in prominence in recent years (Bharti et al., 2001;Bharti and Singh, 2003;Sinha, 2009;Bharti, 2012;Jadav and Sathe, 2015;Chakraborty et al., 2017;Hore et al., 2017;Chakraborty et al., 2019;Bhattacherjee et al., 2021). The present study focuses on both morphological and molecular identification of forensic dipterans and the differences in their diversity, colonization, and succession patterns on two different types of carcasses concerning environmental factors, namely fish carcass that is Rohu (Labeo rohita Hamilton) and avian carcass that is Indian Cormorant (Phalacrocorax fuscicollis Stephens), from an urban habitat in Kolkata. ...
Article
Full-text available
Necrophagous Diptera are the first arthropods that inhabit carrion, enabling microbial decomposition and aiding in maintaining ecosystem balance, thus being important from ecological and forensic standpoints. This study compared dipteran fauna collected from Indian Cormorant (Phalacrocorax fuscicollis Stephens) and Rohu (Labeo rohita Hamilton) corpses in Kolkata’s urban environment. During this research, 1466 fly specimens were collected and identified from two carcasses comprising 5 families, 6 genera, and 9 species of forensic flies. In the avian carcass, dipteran families Calliphoridae, Muscidae, and Sarcophagidae were more abundant compared to the fish carrion. The common genera of dipterans that visited both carcasses were Chrysomya, Sarcophaga, Sepsis, Musca, and Atherigona. The dominant species of Diptera on both carcasses and throughout all the decomposition stages was Chrysomya megacephala Fabricius, thus indicating it as the most valuable species for post-mortem interval (PMI) determination in criminal, homicidal and wildlife poaching cases from the urban habitat of Kolkata.
... The common necrophagous flies are classified as follows: Diptera, which includes the Calliphoridae, Muscidae, Sarcophagidae, Phoridae, Stratiomyidae, Sepsidae etc. families, are well-known as forensically significant flies (Anderson and VanLaerhoven, 1996;Villet, 2010;Sharif and Qamar, 2021;Kar et al., 2022;Palavesam et al., 2022). In India, there are limited reports on the occurrence of insects of forensic interest (Singh and Bharti, 2000;Bharti et al., 2001;Nandi, 2002;Bharti and Singh, 2003;Ramaraj et al., 2014;Bharti and Singh, 2017;Chakraborty et al., 2017;Hore et al., 2017;Bhattacherjee et al., 2021;Sharif and Qamar, 2021;Shinde et al., 2021;Babu et al., 2022;Kar et al., 2022;Palavesam et al., 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
The field of forensic entomology emphasizes the close relationship between insects and cadavers, as well as the utilization of insects in medicolegal investigations, and helps understand the reasons for death. In forensic science, the presence of necrophagous dipteran flies on a dead body is particularly important, as they play a significant role in the decomposition of the carcass. In recent times, necrophagous fly data has been used to investigate the causes of mortality. The evidence is useful in the estimation of post-mortem interval (PMI), which is important in solving medico-legal cases in human beings, and also helpful in wildlife forensics. The present paper reports day-wise observations of the dipteran visitors on the decaying corpse of the Asiatic Jackal in the Veerangana Durgawati Wildlife Sanctuary, Damoh district, Madhya Pradesh. Adult dipteran flies consisting of five species from fewer than four families, namely Calliphoridae, Sarcophagidae, Muscidae, and Sepsidae, were collected from the site. Chrysomya megacephala was the first visitor of the carcass and both Chrysomya megacephala and Chrysomya rufifacies were the most common species during the various stages of decay of the cadaver. The other necrophagous flies that visited the cadaver were: Musca planiceps, Sarcophaga (Seniorwhitea) princeps, and Themira (Themira) bifida. This study is the first of its kind conducted in Central India. The findings might be used to supplement the information in forensic investigations for criminal cases and wildlife hunting in India.
... The calliphorids [15], sarcophagids [16,17], and muscids [18,19] are the most common necrophagous fly groups found in India and are noted for colonising carcasses. Flies from the fannidae, stratiomyidae [20,21], phoridae [22], sepsidae [23], piophilidae, neriidae, and ulidiidae families have also been recorded [24]. Studies on decomposer or necrophagous flies have been concentrated on forensic entomology research in India, although there have been no local systematic inventories of this fauna. ...
Article
Full-text available
India has experienced an increase in violent murder cases in recent years. In 2021, there were over 29 thousand murders reported across India. Furthermore, more than 55 thousand attempted murder cases were filed in the country that year. A consistent increase in attempted murder cases was seen over the years till 2017. The reasons for death have been elucidated using necrophagous fly data in recent years. Forensic entomology focuses on the close bond between insects and corpses in addition to the use of insects in medicolegal investigations and as well as necrophagous flies play a crucial role in the decay of corpses. A checklist of necrophagous flies from India is hence provided. A total of 349 species belonging to 56 genera under 16 families are documented in this list along with their details of distribution. This is the first checklist of necrophagous flies from India which gives the complete scenario of the diversity of such flies from this megadiverse country. This checklist might serve as a new source of data on criminal cases and wildlife poaching in India.
Article
Full-text available
A comprehensive revised checklist pertaining to taxonomy and bionomics of Sarcophagidae of Assam is prepared. The current study revealed the presence of 23 species, including four endemic and 19 non-endemic from Assam, in comparison to elsewhere in the world.
Article
Full-text available
A checklist of forensic flies from India is provided. A total of 65 species belonging to 16 genera under 8 families are documented in this list. This is the very first checklist of forensic flies from India, and it presents an overview of the diversity of these insects in this vast country with immense diversity. This checklist will act as a source of information about crime and wildlife hunting in India.
Article
Full-text available
There are three families of Dipterans, namely Calliphoridae, Oestridae, and Sarcophagidae, that have been found to cause, a condition called myiasis in cattle, this condition may result in a decrease in milk, meat, and wool production. The current study envisages to use of taxonomy and bionomics to understand and identify, one of the most ubiquitous myiasis-causing flies fly, viz., Sarcophaga (Parasarcophaga) albiceps, a fly with high economic and veterinary importance, by field workers.
Article
Full-text available
Accurate estimation of post mortem interval (PMI) can be crucial to the successful investigation of suspicious death. The forensic indicator blowflies are essential for accuracy in estimation of PMI. The Calliphoridae species Chrysomya megacephala and Chrysomya rufifacies were reared in laboratory condition for studying their time duration of different stages under the fluctuating temperature in three different seasons (i.e. rainy season, winter season and summer season). In laboratory, at the fluctuating temperature during rainy season, winter season and summer season, Chrysomya megacephala took 237 hours 47 minutes, 263 hours 51 minutes and 211 hours 13 minutes respectively. Whereas the Chrysomya rufifacies took 239 hours 14 minutes, 286 hours 02 minutes and 216 hours 26 minutes during rainy season, winter season and summer season respectively. This study shows that forensic investigators will have to take each of these variables into consideration from the development of insects in order to give a more accurate estimate of PMI. Keywords: Forensic entomology; Postmortem interval; Seasonal life cycle duration; Fluctuating temperature
Article
Full-text available
Correct species identification is the first and the most important criteria in entomological evidence-based postmortem interval (PMI) estimation. Although morphological keys are available for species identification of adult blow flies, keys for immature stages are either lacking or are incomplete. In this study, cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) reference data were developed from nine species (belonging to three subfamilies, namely, Calliphorinae, Luciliinae, and Chrysomyinae) of blow flies from India. Seven of the nine species included in this study were found suitable for DNA-based identification using COI gene, because they showed nonoverlapping intra- (0.0-0.3%) and inter-(1.96-18.14%) specific diversity, and formed well-supported monophyletic clade in phylogenetic analysis. The remaining two species (i.e., Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius) and Chrysomya chani Kurahashi) cannot be distinguished reliably using our database because they had a very low interspecific diversity (0.11%), and Ch. megacephala was paraphyletic with respect to Ch. chani in the phylogenetic analysis. We conclude that the COI gene is a useful marker for DNA-based identification of blow flies from India.
Article
Full-text available
A case of cutaneous myiasis caused by Chrysomya albiceps (Wiedemann) and Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius) was reported.
Article
Full-text available
Generally, the blow flies and flesh flies are found on dead and decaying bodies which give many clues regarding the death of the victim for forensic scientists. Here, we have reported for the first time, the presence of Parasarcophaga (Thomsonea) argyrostoma (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) flesh flies, from the sample collected from Beed district of Maharashtra State, India. In present study the morphological characters, structure of genitalia and sternite of male, cephaloskeleton, posterior spiracles, spines on thoracic segment and pupa are used as identification keys along with its geographical habitat reported in India. P.argyrostoma is not only found as vector of different microorganisms but is also reported to cause Myiasis in live human and animals.