Content uploaded by Rika Ohkubo
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Rika Ohkubo on Oct 29, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
nature structural & molecular biology volume 24 number 9 september 2017 687
all three cell types, illustrating a remarkable tis-
sue- or cell-type specificity in aging-associated
reprogramming of the clock. Aged epidermal
and skeletal muscle stem cells lost oscillation
of homeostasis genes but gained oscillation
in genes mediating a stress response to DNA
damage and inflammation or autophagy6. In
contrast, oscillatory genes involved in NAD+
metabolism and protein acetylation figured
prominently in the liver5 (Fig. 1).
Surprisingly, the expression of core clock
genes and clock-controlled genes remained
unchanged with aging, despite the drastic
circadian reprogramming5,6. Thus, the core
clock machinery remains largely intact in old
age, giving hope for the prospect of reversing
aging-associated circadian reprogramming to
potentially improve physiological functions.
Indeed, CR-induced robust reprogramming
of the circadian transcriptome partially over-
laps with the circadian transcriptome in young
mice5,6. Thus, the profound physiological
impact of CR may be, in part, mediated by the
reprogramming of the circadian clock.
The subject of calorie restriction (CR) is of
wide interest because it is the most robust
intervention to extend mammalian lifespan.
More impressively, it reverses aging-associated
physiological decline and ameliorates a wide
spectrum of diseases1,2. It was thought that
this dietary regimen elicits its health ben-
efits through a passive effect of reduced meta-
bolic rate. However, recent advances in aging
research favor the view that the organismal
effects of mammalian CR are actively regulated
processes3,4. Two recent studies by Sato et al.5
and Solanas et al.6 reveal that aging reprograms
the circadian transcriptome in a cell-type-de-
pendent manner and that such rewiring can be
reversed by the administration of the CR diet.
These findings provide high-resolution molec-
ular ‘fingerprints’ of the circadian response to
physiological aging and CR and add new evi-
dence for the emerging concept that aging-
associated conditions can be reversed7–9.
A large number of physiological events
follow circadian rhythms. It has been specu-
lated that the robustness of circadian rhythms
deteriorates with age, accounting for much of
aging-associated physiological decline10–12.
Taking a systems biology approach, Sato et al.
and Solanas et al. profiled the circadian tran-
scriptome of the liver, epidermal and skeletal
muscle stem cells of young and aged mice fed
either ad libitum or a CR diet5,6. Strikingly,
a large number of oscillatory transcripts
(1,400–2,600) in young mice lost their rhyth-
mic expression in old mice, whereas numerous
de novo oscillating genes (~1,600 in all three cell
types) were observed exclusively in old mice.
These findings provide compelling molecular
evidence that aging is associated with a signifi-
cant reprogramming of the circadian clock and
that this phenomenon is conserved across tis-
sues and cell types.
An interesting finding came from direct com-
parison of the age-specific oscillatory transcripts
from the three cell types. Very few oscillatory
transcripts were consistently altered with age in
Aging: rewiring the circadian clock
Rika Ohkubo & Danica Chen
The robustness of the circadian clock deteriorates with aging. Two new studies show that aging reprograms
the circadian transcriptome in a cell-type-dependent manner and that such rewiring can be reversed
by caloric restriction.
Rika Ohkubo and Danica Chen are at the
Program in Metabolic Biology, Nutritional
Sciences & Toxicology , University of California,
Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
e-mail: danicac@berkeley.edu
How does rewiring of the circadian clock
contribute to cellular aging? A closer look at
the phases of the circadian genes and their
regulated cellular processes in young and old
mice might offer a clue. In young epidermal
stem cells, DNA replication takes place at night,
whereas maximal oxidative phosphorylation
occurs during the day13,14. It was thought that
temporal segregation of DNA replication and
oxidative phosphorylation at different times
of the 24-h cycle ensures that unwound DNA
is exposed to minimal oxidative stress and
thereby prevents DNA damage. Solanas et al.
now found that in aged epidermal stem cells,
DNA replication was delayed and extended
into the daytime, whereas the phase of oxidative
phosphorylation remained unchanged6. Thus,
rewiring of the circadian clock with age can lead
to misalignment of cellular activities and the
resulting accumulation of cellular damage.
Taken together, these new findings also
open up many questions. If the core clock
machinery remains intact during aging, what
are the driving forces of aging-associated
Figure 1 Aging reprograms the circadian transcriptome in a cell-type-dependent manner. Aged
epidermal and skeletal muscle stem cells lose oscillating transcription of genes that regulate
homeostasis but gain oscillating expression of genes mediating stress responses. Oscillatory genes
involved in NAD+ metabolism and protein acetylation are enriched in the liver. Such rewiring can be
reversed in part by the administration of the CR diet.
Calorie restriction
Aging
Acetylation and
NAD+ metabolism
Homeostasis
Stress
response
Muscle and skin
stem cells
Liver
12
6
9
111
57
210
48
3
12
6
9
1
11
5
7
2
10
4
83
Kimberly Caesar/Springer Nature
news and views
© 2017 Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved.
688 volume 24 number 9 september 2017 nature structural & molecular biology
circadian reprogramming, and what are the
mediators of CR-induced circadian reprogram-
ming? The observed enrichment of circadian
genes related to NAD+ metabolism, protein
acetylation, and stress resistance points to the
sirtuin family of NAD+-dependent deacety-
lases as potential mediators of reprogramming.
Sirtuins are known to extend mammalian
lifespan and healthspan15,16, mediate aspects of
the CR response3,4, and have increasingly been
appreciated as stress-resistance regulators4,7,9,17.
Fittingly, several sirtuins have been implicated in
circadian control18 and there is some degree of
overlap between SIRT1-dependent hepatic circa-
dian genes and aging- or CR-associated hepatic
circadian genes5. Further studies are needed to
determine whether overexpression of SIRT1 or
other mammalian sirtuins (SIRT2–SIRT7) pre-
vents aging-associated circadian reprogramming
and whether CR induces circadian reprogram-
ming in the absence of sirtuins.
It is now widely accepted that the general
cause of aging is the accumulation of cellular
damage19,20. Aging-associated stress resis-
tance is particularly relevant to adult stem
1. Luo, H., Chiang, H.H., Louw, M., Susanto, A. & Chen,
D. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 28, 449–460 (2017).
2. Weindruch, R. & Walford, R.L. The Retardation of Aging
and Disease by Dietary Restriction (Charles C. Thomas
Publisher, 1988).
3. Chen, D., Steele, A.D., Lindquist, S. & Guarente, L.
Science 310, 1641 (2005).
4. Qiu, X., Brown, K., Hirschey, M.D., Verdin, E. & Chen, D.
Cell Metab. 12, 662–667 (2010).
5. Sato, S. et al. Cell 170, 664–677 (2017).
6. Solanas, G. et al. Cell 170, 678–692 (2017).
7. Brown, K. et al. Cell Rep. 3, 319–327 (2013).
8. Goodell, M.A. & Rando, T.A. Science 350, 1199–1204
(2015).
9. Mohrin, M. et al. Science 347, 1374–1377 (2015).
10. Kondratov, R.V., Kondratova, A.A., Gorbacheva, V.Y.,
Vykhovanets, O.V. & Antoch, M.P. Genes Dev. 20,
1868–1873 (2006).
11. Nakamura, T.J. et al. J. Neurosci. 31, 10201–10205
(2011).
12. Sellix, M.T. et al. J. Neurosci. 32, 16193–16202 (2012).
13. Geyfman, M. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109,
11758–11763 (2012).
14. Stringari, C. et al. Cell Rep. 10, 1–7 (2015).
15. Finkel, T., Deng, C.X. & Mostoslavsky, R. Nature 460,
587–591 (2009).
16. Kanfi, Y. et al. Nature 483, 218–221 (2012).
17. Shin, J. et al. Cell Rep. 5, 654–665 (2013).
18. Masri, S. & Sassone-Corsi, P. Sci. Signal. 7, re6 (2014).
19. López-Otín, C., Blasco, M.A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M.
& Kroemer, G. Cell 153, 1194–1217 (2013).
20. Vijg, J. & Campisi, J. Nature 454, 1065–1071
(2008).
cells, which persist throughout the organis-
mal lifespan to repair and maintain tissues7,9.
The aging-associated circadian reprogram-
ming of both homeostasis and stress-
resistance genes observed in adult stem cells
suggests that increased cellular damage is a
driver of aging-associated circadian repro-
gramming. Given that aging-associated
accumulation of DNA damage in stem cells
originates from exposure to mitochondrial
stress6 and that the mitochondrial protective
programs are repressed in aged adult stem
cells7,9, it is tempting to speculate that reac-
tivating the mitochondrial protective pro-
grams may provide a means to reduce the
accumulation of cellular damage and reverse
aging-associated circadian reprogramming.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
D.C. is supported by NIH grant R01DK101885,
the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, the
PackerWentz Endowment and the Chau Hoi Shuen
Foundation. R.O. is supported by the ITO Scholarship
and the Honjo International Scholarship.
COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
A tripartite interface that regulates vesicle fusion
In neurons, SNARE proteins mediate the fusion of neurotransmitter-
containing vesicles with the plasma membrane, leading to the release of
neurotransmitters upon action potential. To prime fusion, SNARE proteins
in the vesicle membrane (synaptobrevin-2) and in the target membrane
(SNAP-25 and syntaxin-1A) form a complex characterized by a core four-
helix bundle, called the SNARE complex (pictured; synaptobrevin-2 is dark
blue, SNAP-25 is green and syntaxin-1A is red).
However, SNARE proteins do not work alone. In fact, vesicle fusion is
stringently regulated, both to prevent spontaneous release and to ensure
that neurotransmitter release occurs in a fast and synchronous manner
upon stimuli. Ca2+ influx, induced by action potential, triggers the fusion
of vesicles docked to the cytoplasmic membrane. The Ca2+ sensor in this
process is synaptotagmin-1 (Syt1), which has two Ca2+-binding domains,
C2A and C2B. Another regulator is complexin (Cpx), which is required to
suppress spontaneous fusion.
Both Syt1 and Cpx interact with the SNARE complex and previous structural work has revealed details of those binary interactions,
but the interplay between the two factors remained unclear. Now, Zhou et al. (Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature23484) have
determined the structure of the prefusion complex containing SNAREs, Syt1 and Cpx. Along with extensive analysis in neuronal cells,
the work uncovers previously unknown interactions and provides major insights into the complex regulation of neuronal vesicle fusion.
Unexpectedly, the new structural data reveal two Syt1 molecules interacting with the SNARE complex via different interfaces, with
their C2B domains bound on opposite sides of the four-helix bundle. The first C2B domain (gray) binds the SNARE complex via the
previously known, or primary, interface. The second C2B domain (orange) interacts with the SNARE complex and with Cpx (light blue),
in what the authors call a ‘tripartite interface’. This interface (marked by a dashed box in the figure) involves the conserved HA a-helix in
C2B, which extends the Cpx a-helix that interacts with the SNARE complex.
Mutagenesis analyses of the tripartite interface show that it is required for Ca2+-triggered synchronous release by neurons, as is the
primary interface. Thus, both binding interfaces are essential to reach the primed prefusion state captured in the new structure.
However, the tripartite interface also serves to ‘lock’ the complex in a primed state; thus, Syt1 and Cpx cooperate to prevent calcium-
independent vesicle fusion. The tripartite interface would be unlocked upon Ca2+ binding to the C2 domains, which would likely result
in release of the Syt1 C2B domain involved in the tripartite complex and conformational rearrangements of the remaining complex.
This proposed unlocking mechanism remains to be confirmed, but the present findings can already explain the phenotypes of Cpx or
Syt1 knockouts and of dominant-negative Syt1 mutations.
Inês Chen
HB
HB
C
N
HAHA
74
195
244
66
Synaptobrevin-2
SNAP-25_C
Syntaxin-1A
SNAP-25_N
Syt1 C2A
Ca2+–binding site
Ca2+–binding
site
Syt1 C2B
Syt1 C2B
C
Cpx
C
74
N
Ca2+–binding
site
990 Å2
720 Å2
news and views
© 2017 Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved.
















