This paper analyzes the impact of the neoscholastic psychology movement in Argentinian psychology between 1935-1965, through the study of books of psychology published within this movement that circulated in Argentina in that period. A list of 126 neoscholastic books are analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively, making use of the sociobibliometrical method. The impact is researched comparatively
... [Show full abstract] in Catholic and non- Catholic academic institutions, through reference to the books such as: psychological textbooks and manuals, psychological and philosophical dictionaries, psychological and philosophical journals with sections on psychology including references found in articles and book reviews, and bibliographies of programs in psychology of national and private Argentinian universities. The study shows a growing reception of neoscholastic psychology in Argentinian psychology, especially between 1955 and 1965, both in neoscholastic and non-neoscholastic institutions.