Technical ReportPDF Available

Best Management Practices for Farmers Using Seeds Treated With Neonicotinoid Insecticides

Authors:

Abstract

General Principles for Best Management Practices: 1. Do not use seed treated with neonicotinoids unless there is a specific pest problem that can be effectively managed with a neonicotinoid seed treatment. 2. When the use of neonicotinoids is not warranted, purchase seed that is not treated with this group of chemicals (seeds may be treated with fungicides or other pesticides). If seed selection is limited, contact your seed company’s field representative to request increased selection and availability of seed that is not treated with neonicotinoids. 3. Before planting with seeds treated with neonicotinoids, notify any nearby beekeepers, so that they can protect their bees. Also remove flowering plants from the field and field edges by mowing or tillage. 4. Read and follow all instructions on the seed tag including personal protective equipment to be used in handling seed and required buffer zones. 5. Keep the treatment on the seed during storage and handling. Avoid storing seed under extreme temperatures and excessive humidity that may increase the breakdown of the seed treatment. 6. Reduce insecticide dust produced at planting, keeping the treatment on the seed as much as possible. Load treated seed into planter boxes in a manner that will minimize the dust from becoming airborne. Minimize any drift of dust outside the field. Most problems with neonicotinoid-contaminated dust drifting in the air have been with treated corn planted using vacuum planters. There is currently no single solution to this problem. Options, including using deflectors or filters on the planting equipment and changing the lubricant mixed with the seed, are discussed below. 7. Avoid planting on windy days when any dust will blow into the environment, particularly if wind is blowing toward bee hives, flowering trees or standing water sources used by bees. 8. Dispose of any leftover treated seed properly, following directions on the seed tag. Generally it is best to plant it or bury it in an appropriate place away from water bodies. 9. Dispose of any dust left over in seed bags and filters properly, following any instructions on the seed bag or using the hazardous waste collection process in your municipality. (Because this is farm waste rather than household waste, there may be a fee.)
1
Best Management Practices for Farmers Using Seeds Treated With Neonicotinoid
Insecticides
Dr. Kimberly Stoner
Neonicotinoids are a group of insecticides that have a mode of action similar to that of nicotine
and are often used as seed treatments because they can travel from the seed into the plant and
control insects feeding on plants as well as on the seed. Honey bees, native bees such as bumble
bees and mason bees, and many other native pollinators are critically important to Connecticut’s
agricultural community. While the primary concern is acute exposure to neonicotinoid
insecticides, particularly from airborne dust associated with planting of treated seed, there is
growing concern regarding the chronic exposure to foraging bees from nectar, pollen, and plant
guttation which supplies water bees transport back to the hive.
Four neonicotinoid insecticides that are highly toxic to honey bees and native bees such as
bumble bees are regulated by Connecticut Public Act 16-17 (An Act Concerning Pollinator
Health): clothianidin, dinotefuran, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam.
Some common trade names for insecticides used as seed treatments with these active ingredients
are (1):
Clothianidin: Poncho, NipsItInside, Poncho/VOTiVO
Thiamethoxam: Cruiser
Imidacloprid: Gaucho
Although neonicotinoid seed treatments are used on a wide range of crop plants, including
soybean, cotton, canola, wheat, sunflower, potato, and many vegetables (1,2), reported honey
bee kills from neonicotinoids have most often been associated with dust from corn seed released
by vacuum planters at planting time (3,4,5,6). In addition to affecting honey bees and native
bees, neonicotinoids applied as seed treatments may also affect other beneficial insects (7,8) and
contaminate groundwater, streams and wetlands (9,10,11). Treated seeds are also attractive to
birds, and the amount of neonicotinoid on one treated corn kernel is enough to kill a songbird
(12). Thus, there are many reasons to be careful in using neonicotinoid-treated seeds.
General Principles for Best Management Practices:
1. Do not use seed treated with neonicotinoids unless there is a specific pest problem that
can be effectively managed with a neonicotinoid seed treatment.
2. When the use of neonicotinoids is not warranted, purchase seed that is not treated with
this group of chemicals (seeds may be treated with fungicides or other pesticides). If seed
selection is limited, contact your seed company’s field representative to request increased
selection and availability of seed that is not treated with neonicotinoids.
2
3. Before planting with seeds treated with neonicotinoids, notify any nearby beekeepers, so
that they can protect their bees. Also remove flowering plants from the field and field
edges by mowing or tillage.
4. Read and follow all instructions on the seed tag including personal protective equipment
to be used in handling seed and required buffer zones.
5. Keep the treatment on the seed during storage and handling. Avoid storing seed under
extreme temperatures and excessive humidity that may increase the breakdown of the
seed treatment.
6. Reduce insecticide dust produced at planting, keeping the treatment on the seed as much
as possible. Load treated seed into planter boxes in a manner that will minimize the dust
from becoming airborne. Minimize any drift of dust outside the field. Most problems
with neonicotinoid-contaminated dust drifting in the air have been with treated corn
planted using vacuum planters. There is currently no single solution to this problem.
Options, including using deflectors or filters on the planting equipment and changing the
lubricant mixed with the seed, are discussed below.
7. Avoid planting on windy days when any dust will blow into the environment, particularly
if wind is blowing toward bee hives, flowering trees or standing water sources used by
bees.
8. Dispose of any leftover treated seed properly, following directions on the seed tag.
Generally it is best to plant it or bury it in an appropriate place away from water bodies.
9. Dispose of any dust left over in seed bags and filters properly, following any instructions
on the seed bag or using the hazardous waste collection process in your municipality.
(Because this is farm waste rather than household waste, there may be a fee.)
Specific Information:
Seed treatment with neonicotinoids has advantages when compared to application of pesticides
by other methods, particularly when used to control insect pests that feed on seeds or seedlings
early in the season. Neonicotinoids have a combination of high toxicity to insects and low
toxicity to mammals that make them safer than many of the older insecticides, and application to
the seed allows the amount applied per area to be greatly reduced compared to soil or foliar
applications (6, 13). However, several studies have found that neonicotinoid seed treatments are
being widely used in crops and regions where there is little or no economic benefit (14, 15), and
in some cases even reducing yield by killing off the natural enemies of pests (8). The Integrated
Pest Management (IPM) approach would call for using a preemptive pesticide treatment only
when there is a high probability of a target pest causing economic damage or when rescue
treatments cannot keep the target pest under the economic injury level (15, 17). This approach
would greatly decrease the use of seed treatments (15, 16) and the associated unintended
consequences of overuse of pesticides including evolution of insecticide resistance, outbreaks of
non-target pests, resurgence of target pests, and negative effects on the environment (14 ,16).
For some crops, neonicotinoid seed treatments have been overused in part because seed
producers sold these as part of a “package” along with fungicide treatment or genetic
3
modifications for resistance to insects not controlled by neonicotinoids (14, 16). According to
Canadian authorities, most seed companies can accommodate orders for non-insecticide treated
seed (16).
As with any application of an insecticide highly toxic to bees, drift of insecticide dust onto bee
hives and onto flowering plants being used by bees should be avoided. Although research has
shown that honey bees are mostly using flowering trees such as maple, willow, apple, cherry,
and hawthorn at the time of spring planting (17), other spring flowering weeds and wildflowers
like clovers, dandelions and mustards are also used by honey bees (17) and mustards and clovers
are very important to bumble bees and other native pollinators (18, 19).
Although seeds of many different crops have been treated with neonicotinoids, bee kills at
planting have generally been associated with treated corn (3, 4, 5, 6, 21). A few studies of
treated seeds of other crops have found much less insecticide dust in batches of sugar beet and
oil seed rape seeds than in corn (6), although another detailed study found that wheat may have
as much risk of dust drift as corn (22).
The most important factors affecting the amount of dust released into the air when planting
neonicotinoid treated corn seeds are the quality of the seed treatment, the equipment used for
planting, and the weather conditions at the time of planting (6, 17, 21). The quality of the seed
treatment depends on how well the seed has been cleaned before treatment; the formulation of
the treatment, including the active ingredient (insecticide), polymers used to stick the active
ingredient to the seed; and film coatings added to the outside (6,17). The quality of the seed
treatment has been shown to be variable across corn varieties and among batches in various
studies (17, 21), and this has been correlated with bee kills (21) or with high levels of dust
released at planting (17).
The equipment used for planting has also been found to be important. Most farmers growing
corn use pneumatic precision seed planters, also called vacuum planters (5, 6, 17, 21). A few
studies have compared vacuum planters to planters using a mechanical method or compressed air
to place the seed, and have found that the planters without a vacuum produce much less dust (16,
21) and less hazard to bees (21) than vacuum planters. In vacuum planters, corn seeds are
precisely spaced in the row by using a vacuum, generated by a central fan, to aspirate the seeds
onto a perforated disk, and to keep each seed sticking to a single hole in the disk until the seed
drops into the furrow (5, 21). The fan draws air in through an air intake, and then exhausts it
through an outlet that is typically 4 to 6 feet above the ground (5, 21). A lubricant, such as talc or
graphite, may be used to keep the seeds from sticking together, but also abrades the seed and
creates insecticide dust, which mixes with the lubricant (23). This mixture of lubricant and
insecticide dust travels in different directions: some travels into the furrow and is planted with
the seed, some is exhausted into the air, and some remains behind in the planting equipment (23).
Xue et al. (5) have also shown that field dust is sucked in through the air intake, abrades the seed,
and then is exhausted into the air. Because neonicotinoid insecticides break down slowly and are
so heavily used, the field dust already has residues of a neonicotinoid (clothianidin) before it
goes into the planter, but the carry-over pesticide accounts for only 5% of the insecticide residue
in the aerial dust; 95% of the neonicotinoid residues are from seed dust (5).
4
The combination of defective seed treatment and the vacuum planter system can create the
problem of dust highly toxic to bees traveling into the air and potentially coming into contact
with bees or plants used by bees (5, 6, 17, 21, 23). Various modifications have been tried with
some degree of success. After a large bee kill in Germany associated with poor quality seed
treatment of corn and vacuum planters (21), Bayer (the pesticide manufacturer) instituted
standardization of seed treatment, training of workers, and testing of seeds to make sure that dust
was minimized, and also worked with European equipment manufacturers to create kits to
modify the vacuum planters to release the exhaust air, and thus the dust, at a lower air speed
close to the ground, ideally into the furrows (6, 21). These deflectors were required in some
European countries, but they generated such a large amount of dust close to the ground that
many farmers refused to use them (6).
The province of Ontario requires farmers to use a new lubricant, Bayer Fluency Agent (ethane, a
homopolymer), rather than talc or graphite, when planting neonicotinoid-treated seed of corn or
soybeans (20). However, a direct comparison of this lubricant compared to the lubricants chosen
by farmers (talc, graphite or a mixture of the two) showed no significant difference in dust
released (17). A change in lubricant may not be effective in reducing insecticide dust if field dust
is also entering the system and abrading the seed (5).
There are many points at which farmers could modify the planting system: using no-till planting
to avoid generating field dust (5), filtering the air intake to limit field dust coming into the
planter (5), using a new seed lubricant to reduce abrasion of the seed (20), diverting the dust into
the seed furrow during planting (6, 21) or filtering the air exhaust (5, 6, 21). In my discussions
with scientists researching these options, none is currently considered the single best option
(Reed Johnson, Ohio State University; Art Schaafsma, Guelph University; personal
communication).
Once the planting is finished, it is important to collect any spilled seed and dispose of spilled and
leftover seed properly. Seeds left on the soil surface are particularly a hazard to birds. According
to a study by the American Bird Conservancy, a single corn kernel treated with any of the
commonly used neonicotinoids can kill a songbird, and 1/10 of a treated corn kernel is enough to
reduce reproduction in a songbird (12). Seed disposal instructions should be on the seed tag.
Generally it is recommended to plant leftover seed in the headland or in double rows in the field
or to bury it away from water bodies.
At the end of planting, the farmer may be left with seed bags contaminated with insecticide dust,
or if filters have been used on the air exhaust of the planter, these filters will have collected the
insecticide dust. Dust may also be left behind in the planting equipment, and should be
vacuumed out using a vacuum with a filter. This then leaves the farmer with the problem of
disposing of bags and filters with insecticidal dust. If there are instructions on the seed tag or
label about how to dispose of the dust, those should be followed. Otherwise, seal the material
securely and dispose of it using the local hazardous waste process. Because this is farm waste
and not household waste, there may be a fee.
References:
5
1. Douglas, M.R. and Tooker, J.F., 2015. Large-scale deployment of seed treatments has
driven rapid increase in use of neonicotinoid insecticides and preemptive pest management
in US field crops. Environmental science & technology, 49(8), pp.5088-5097.
Supplemental Information online: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/es506141g
2. Krupke, C.H. and Long, E.Y., 2015. Intersections between neonicotinoid seed treatments
and honey bees. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 10, pp.8-13.
3. Pistorius, J., Bischoff, G., Heimbach, U. and Stähler, M. 2009. Bee poisoning incidents in
Germany in spring 2008 caused by abrasion of active substance from treated seeds during
sowing of maize. Julius-Kühn-Archiv, 423: 118-126.
4. Cutler, G.C., Scott-Dupree, C.D., and Drexler, D.M. 2014. Honey bees, neonicotinoids, and
bee incident reports: The Canadian situation. Pest Management Science 70: 779-783.
5. Xue, Y., Limay-Rios, V., Smith, J., Baute, T., Forero, L.G. and Schaafsma, A., 2015.
Quantifying Neonicotinoid Insecticide Residues Escaping during Maize Planting with
Vacuum Planters. Environmental science & technology, 49(21), pp.13003-13011.
6. Nuyttens, D., Devarrewaere, W., Verboven, P. and Foqué, D., 2013. Pesticideladen dust
emission and drift from treated seeds during seed drilling: a review. Pest management
science, 69(5), pp.564-575.
7. Pisa, L.W., Amaral-Rogers, V., Belzunces, L.P., Bonmatin, J.M., Downs, C.A., Goulson,
D., Kreutzweiser, D.P., Krupke, C., Liess, M., McField, M. and Morrissey, C.A., 2015.
Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates. Environmental Science
and Pollution Research, 22(1), pp.68-102.
8. Douglas, M.R., Rohr, J.R. and Tooker, J.F., 2015. Neonicotinoid insecticide travels through
a soil food chain, disrupting biological control of nontarget pests and decreasing soya bean
yield. Journal of applied ecology, 52(1), pp.250-260.
9. Goulson, D., 2013. Review: An overview of the environmental risks posed by
neonicotinoid insecticides. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(4), pp.977-987.
10. Hladik, M.L., Kolpin, D.W. and Kuivila, K.M., 2014. Widespread occurrence of
neonicotinoid insecticides in streams in a high corn and soybean producing region, USA.
Environmental Pollution, 193, pp.189-196.
11. Main, A.R., Michel, N.L., Cavallaro, M.C., Headley, J.V., Peru, K.M. and Morrissey, C.A.,
2016. Snowmelt transport of neonicotinoid insecticides to Canadian Prairie wetlands.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 215, pp.76-84.
12. Mineau, P. and C. Palmer. 2013. The impact of the nation’s most widely used insecticides
on birds. American Bird Conservancy. http://abcbirds.org/wp-
content/uploads/2015/05/Neonic_FINAL.pdf
13. Elbert, A., Haas, M., Springer, B., Thielert, W. and Nauen, R., 2008. Applied aspects of
neonicotinoid uses in crop protection. Pest management science, 64(11), pp.1099-1105
14. Myers, C. and Hill, E., 2014. Benefits of neonicotinoid seed treatments to soybean
production. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
15. Douglas, M.R. and Tooker, J.F., 2015. Large-scale deployment of seed treatments has
driven rapid increase in use of neonicotinoid insecticides and preemptive pest management
in US field crops. Environmental science & technology, 49(8), pp.5088-5097.
6
16. Baute, T. 2014. New 2014 BMPs for Pollinator Protection and Use of Insecticide Treated
Seed. http://fieldcropnews.com/2014/01/new-2014-bmps-for-pollinator-protection-and-use-
of-insecticide-treated-seed/
17. Corn Dust Research Consortium (2015). Corn Dust Research Consortium Preliminary
Report. Initial Findings for 2014.
http://www.pollinator.org/PDFs/July2015CDRCFINAL.pdf
18. Westphal, C., SteffanDewenter, I. and Tscharntke, T., 2003. Mass flowering crops
enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale. Ecology Letters, 6(11), pp.961-965.
19. Goulson, D. 2010. Bumblebees: Behaviour, Ecology, and Conservation. 2nd edition. Oxford
University Press.
20. Health Canada. 2014. Pollinator Protection and Responsible Use of Insecticide Treated
Seed. http://fieldcropnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/pollinator-protecton-Jan-
9final.pdf
21. Nikolakis, A., Chapple, A., Friessleben, R., Neumann, P., Schad, T., Schmuck, R., Schnier,
H.F., Schnorbach, H.J., Schöning, R. and Maus, C., 2010. An effective risk management
approach to prevent bee damage due to the emission of abraded seed treatment particles
during sowing of seeds treated with bee toxic insecticides. Julius-Kühn-Archiv, (423),
p.132.
22. Foqu, D., Devarrewaere, W., Verboven, P., Nuyttens, D., Anderson, P.G., Balsari, P.,
Carpenter, P.I., Cooper, S.E., Glass, C.R., Magri, B. and Miller, P.C.H., 2014. Physical and
chemical characteristics of abraded seed coating particles. Aspects of Applied Biology, 122,
pp.85-94.
23. Krupke, C.H., Hunt, G.J., Eitzer, B.D., Andino, G. and Given, K., 2012. Multiple routes of
pesticide exposure for honey bees living near agricultural fields. PLoS one, 7(1), p.e29268.
Appendix
Best Management Practices for Treated Seeds from other sources:
American Seed Trade Association
www.seed-treatment-guide.com
For Farmers
http://seed-treatment-guide.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ASTA-Seed-Guide-Farmers.pdf
Health Canada
Pollinator Protection and Responsible Use of Insecticide Treated Seed.
http://fieldcropnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/pollinator-protecton-Jan-9final.pdf
7
Corn Dust Research Consortium Report, July 2015:
http://www.pollinator.org/PDFs/July2015CDRCFINAL.pdf
Thanks to those who reviewed a draft of this document:
Dr. Art Schaafsma, University of Guelph, Ontario
Dr. Jude Boucher, University of Connecticut Cooperative Extension
... Also, they recommend to avoid planting on windy days when any dust will blow the dust into the environment, particularly if wind is blowing toward bee hives, flowering trees or standing water sources used by bees. 23 Wheat seed dressing is practiced in various countries with neonicotinoids. ...
Article
Full-text available
Abstract The European Union voted in April 2018 to ban three controversial neonicotinoid insecticides on all crops grown outdoors because of their adverse effects on pollinators, especially honey bees. The decision caused quite a stir in the farming community because neonicotinoid insecticides had certain advantages in crops like soya. For centuries, gardeners have been using home-made mixtures of tobacco leaves and water as a natural pesticide to kill insect pests. The first commercially available compound was imidacloprid and has been in use since the early 1990s. Neonicotinoids and Fipronil account for approximately 1/3 of the insecticide market worldwide. The success of neonicotinoids as insecticides in agriculture was the result of no known pesticide resistance in target pests, especially boring insects and roof-feeding insects that cannot easily controlled by foliar sprays. Neonicotinoids are licensed for use in more than 120 countries and have a global market value of $2•6 billion, with imidacloprid alone comprising 41% of this market and being the second most widely used agrochemical in the world. In the last 20 years studies investigated if neonicotinoids have contributed to yield increases in farming or whether neonicotinoids offer economic benefits compared to alternatives. Most results were negative. In the last decade much of the controversy over the use of neonicotinoids has focussed on their effects on honey bees. Neonicotinoids are routinely used to dress seeds of oilseed rape, sunflower and maize, and these crops are major forage sources for both managed honeybees and wild pollinators in arable landscapes. Being systemic, small concentrations of neonicotinoids are found in both pollen and nectar of seed‐treated crops. Neonicotinoids are also routinely applied as foliar sprays to fruit crops such as raspberries (mainly thiacloprid), which are visited by both managed and wild pollinators. In 27 April 2018 the European Commission expanded a controversial ban of three neonicotinoid insecticides because of the threat they pose to pollinators. Already, from 2013 the EU placed a moratorium on 3 neonicotinoids forbitting their use in flowering crops that appeal to honey bees and other pollinators. The last decision was greeted with trepidation by farming associations which fear economic harm. There is no ban of neonicotinoids in other countries. This review presents all the facts from scientific studies on neonicotinoids.
Article
Full-text available
A growing understanding of the often subtle unintended impacts of neonicotinoid seed treatments on both non-target organisms and their environment have led to concerns about the suitability of current pest management approaches in large scale agriculture. Several neonicotinoid compounds are used in seed treatments of the most widely grown grain and oilseed crops worldwide. Most applications are made prophylactically and without prior knowledge of pest populations. A growing body of evidence suggests that these compounds become contaminants of soil, water, and plant products, including pollen and nectar. These unforeseen routes of exposure are documented to have negative impacts on honey bee health and also have potential to exert effects on a broader environmental scale.
Article
Full-text available
Neonicotinoids are the most widely used class of insecticides worldwide, but patterns of their use in the U.S. are surprisingly poorly documented, constraining attempts to understand their role in pest management and potential non-target effects. We synthesized publicly available data to estimate and interpret trends in neonicotinoid use since their introduction in 1994, with a special focus on seed treatments, a major use not captured by the national pesticide-use survey. Neonicotinoid use increased rapidly between 2003 and 2011, as seed-applied products were introduced in field crops, marking an unprecedented shift toward large-scale, preemptive insecticide use: 34-44% of soybeans and 79-100% of corn hectares were treated in 2011. This finding contradicts recent analyses, which concluded that insecticides are used today on fewer corn hectares than a decade or two ago. If current trends continue, neonicotinoid use will increase further through application to more hectares of soybean and other crop species and escalation of per-seed rates. Alternatively, our results, and other recent analyses, suggest that carefully targeted efforts could considerably reduce neonicotinoid use in field crops without yield declines or economic harm to farmers, reducing the potential for pest resistance, non-target pest outbreaks, environmental contamination, and harm to wildlife, including pollinator species.
Article
Full-text available
We assessed the state of knowledge regarding the effects of large-scale pollution with neonicotinoid insecticides and fipronil on non-target invertebrate species of terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments. A large section of the assessment is dedicated to the state of knowledge on sublethal effects on honeybees (Apis mellifera) because this important pollinator is the most studied non-target invertebrate species. Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), Lumbricidae (earth-worms), Apoidae sensu lato (bumblebees, solitary bees) and the section "other invertebrates" review available studies on the other terrestrial species. The sections on freshwater and marine species are rather short as little is known so far about the impact of neonicotinoid insecticides and fipronil on the diverse invertebrate fauna of these widely exposed habitats. For terrestrial and aquatic invertebrate species, the known effects of neonicotinoid pesticides and fipronil are described ranging from organismal toxicology and behavioural effects to population-level effects. For earthworms, freshwater and marine species, the relation of findings to regulatory risk assessment is described. Neonicotinoid insecticides exhibit very high toxicity to a wide range of invertebrates, particularly insects, and field-realistic exposure is likely to result in both lethal and a broad range of important sublethal impacts. There is a major knowledge gap regarding impacts on the grand majority of invertebrates, many of which perform essential roles enabling healthy ecosystem functioning. The data on the few non-target species on which field tests have been performed are limited by major flaws in the outdated test protocols. Despite large knowledge gaps and uncertainties, enough knowledge exists to conclude that existing levels of pollution with neonicotinoids and fipronil resulting from presently authorized uses frequently exceed the lowest observed adverse effect concentrations and are thus likely to have large-scale and wide ranging negative biological and ecological impacts on a wide range of non-target invertebrates in terrestrial, aquatic, marine and benthic habitats.
Article
Full-text available
In spring 2008 a high number of bee poisoning incidents was recorded during sowing of maize in the Upper Rhine valley and in South Bavaria near Passau. More than 11.500 honey bee colonies from about 700 beekeepers in the Upper Rhine valley showed symptoms of insecticide poisoning. The reason for the poisoning was the abrasion of dust from maize seeds treated with the insecticide Poncho Pro (a.s. clothianidin) during the sowing process and blowing out of this dust containing the active substance into the environment with pneumatic sowing machines, resulting in contamination of nectar and pollen. The poisonings occurred in areas in southern Germany in which an eradication program for the quarantine pest Diabrotica virgifera virgifera was active and where clothianidin was used at a high rate (125 g a.s. /ha) on a large scale. An exceptionally high amount of dust of up to 80 g per 100.000 kernels of maize was detected in some of the maize seed batches. The chemical analysis of dust, plant samples, bee samples, fresh pollen and bee bread confirmed the poisoning by clothianidin originating from treated maize seeds. No correlation with any bee pathogens was detected.
Book
Bumblebees are familiar and charismatic insects, occurring throughout much of the world. They are increasingly being used as a model organism for studying a wide range of ecological and behavioural concepts, such as social organization, optimal foraging theories, host-parasite interactions, and pollination. Recently they have become a focus for conservationists due to mounting evidence of range coBIOL15ANIB and catastrophic extinctions with some species disappearing from entire continents (e.g. in North America). Only by improving our understanding of their ecology can we devise sensible plans to conserve them. The role of bumblebees as invasive species (e.g. Bombus terrestris in Japan) has also become topical with the growing trade in commercial bumblebee nests for tomato pollination leading to establishment of non-native bumblebees in a number of countries. Since the publication of the first edition of the book, there have been hundreds of research papers published on bumblebees. There is clearly a continuing need for an affordable, well-illustrated, and appealing text that makes accessible all of the major advances in understanding of the behaviour and ecology of bumblebees that have been made in the last 30 years.
Article
Neonicotinoid residues escaping in vacuum-planter exhaust during maize planting were measured in 25 fields in southwestern Ontario in 2013-14 using filter bags to collect planter exhaust dust, and horizontal and vertical sticky traps to collect planter operation-generated dust. Atrazine residues were used to differentiate between neonicotinoid residues originating from seed or from disturbed soil. Recovery rates of seed-applied neonicotinoids in exhaust were 0.014 and 0.365% in 2013 and 2014, respectively, calculated based on neonicotinoid concentrations in pre-plant soil and seed application rates. Neonicotinoid exhaust emission rates were 0.0036 and 0.1104 g/ha for 2013 and 2014, respectively, with 99.9472 and 99.7820% originating from treated seed in 2013 and 2014, respectively, calculated based on atrazine marker. Rates of recovery of seed-applied neonicotinoid residues by exhaust filter bags were 0.015% and 0.437% for 2013 and 2014, respectively. Neonicotinoid residues captured on horizontal and vertical traps were 1.10 (0.1104 g/ha) and 1.45 ng/cm2 (0.0029 g/ha), respectively, with 92.31and 93.03% originating from treated seed, respectively, representing 0.3896% of the original active ingredient applied to the seed planted. Exposure to pollinators can be best reduced by strategies to keep active ingredient on the seed, below the soil surface, and in the field where applied.
Article
During the growing season, neonicotinoid insecticides are frequently transported to surface water systems after rainfall events. However, detectable levels of neonicotinoids have also been found in wetlands during early spring, after ice-off but before crop seeding, representing an unexpected long-term exposure risk for aquatic organisms. This suggests long-term persistence, though origins and transport mechanisms remain unknown. We sampled 16 agricultural fields in the Canadian Prairies to investigate whether snow meltwater, particulate matter, top- (15cm) or bottom-layer (15cm) snow were potential sources of spring neonicotinoid contamination to receiving wetlands. Agricultural fields were selected based on the previous year's crop: eight canola fields (clothianidin-treated seed) and eight oat fields (un-treated). We further sampled the wetlands draining those same oat and canola fields from ice-off to seeding to assess changes in neonicotinoid concentrations over time. Top-layer snow was below the limit of quantification for both canola and oat fields. Neonicotinoid concentrations (sum of clothianidin and thiamethoxam) were highest in meltwater (canola, mean: 267±72.2ngL-1; max: 633), but also detected in bottom-layer snow (oat, mean: 36.1±9.18ngL-1; max: 92.9), and soil particulate matter (canola, mean: 10.2±1.82μg/kg; max: 17.2). Concentrations in meltwater showed a stronger relationship (R2=0.35) with initial concentrations in wetland water than any other source type. Temporary wetland hydrology is largely fed by meltwater thus spring total neonicotinoid concentrations were higher in temporary wetlands than seasonal/semi-permanent wetlands (P=0.003). Only clothianidin was detected in soil particulate matter samples, including from oat fields not treated the year before, confirming this compound can persist over multiple years under local field conditions. The results of this study suggest that under normal agricultural practices, wetlands in colder climates are likely to be contaminated even before seeding occurs through persistence of neonicotinoids in soil and transport by snowmelt and particulate to surface water during spring runoff.
Article
Neonicotinoids are the most widely used insecticides world‐wide, but their fate in the environment remains unclear, as does their potential to influence non‐target species and the roles they play in agroecosystems. We investigated in laboratory and field studies the influence of the neonicotinoid thiamethoxam, applied as a coating to soya bean seeds, on interactions among soya beans, non‐target molluscan herbivores and their insect predators. In the laboratory, the pest slug Deroceras reticulatum was unaffected by thiamethoxam, but transmitted the toxin to predaceous beetles ( Chlaenius tricolor ), impairing or killing >60%. In the field, thiamethoxam‐based seed treatments depressed activity–density of arthropod predators, thereby relaxing predation of slugs and reducing soya bean densities by 19% and yield by 5%. Neonicotinoid residue analyses revealed that insecticide concentrations declined through the food chain, but levels in field‐collected slugs (up to 500 ng g ⁻¹ ) were still high enough to harm insect predators. Synthesis and applications . Our findings reveal a previously unconsidered ecological pathway through which neonicotinoid use can unintentionally reduce biological control and crop yield. Trophic transfer of neonicotinoids challenges the notion that seed‐applied toxins precisely target herbivorous pests and highlights the need to consider predatory arthropods and soil communities in neonicotinoid risk assessment and stewardship.
Article
Neonicotinoids are now the most widely used insecticides in the world. They act systemically, travelling through plant tissues and protecting all parts of the crop, and are widely applied as seed dressings. As neurotoxins with high toxicity to most arthropods, they provide effective pest control and have numerous uses in arable farming and horticulture. However, the prophylactic use of broad‐spectrum pesticides goes against the long‐established principles of integrated pest management ( IPM ), leading to environmental concerns. It has recently emerged that neonicotinoids can persist and accumulate in soils. They are water soluble and prone to leaching into waterways. Being systemic, they are found in nectar and pollen of treated crops. Reported levels in soils, waterways, field margin plants and floral resources overlap substantially with concentrations that are sufficient to control pests in crops, and commonly exceed the LC 50 (the concentration which kills 50% of individuals) for beneficial organisms. Concentrations in nectar and pollen in crops are sufficient to impact substantially on colony reproduction in bumblebees. Although vertebrates are less susceptible than arthropods, consumption of small numbers of dressed seeds offers a route to direct mortality in birds and mammals. Synthesis and applications . Major knowledge gaps remain, but current use of neonicotinoids is likely to be impacting on a broad range of non‐target taxa including pollinators and soil and aquatic invertebrates and hence threatens a range of ecosystem services.