ArticlePDF Available
Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal 2005, 7 (1), 70
70 Review
Analysing Women’s Imprisonment
by Pat Carlen and Anne Worrall
Cullompton: Willan (2004) ISBN 1 843920 69 7
(224 pages, £17.99)
Reviewed by Karen Laing
The number of female prisoners in England and Wales is rising, yet the study of women in prison
can often be ignored, or marginalised, in favour of the study of male imprisonment. Nevertheless,
there is a growing understanding among policymakers and researchers that the issues women face
in their treatment by the criminal justice system, on their subsequent imprisonment and during a
prison sentence, are very different to those of men. As such, a book that examines the state of
current knowledge around women’s imprisonment, and offers practical guidance to encourage further
study and research, is both timely and valuable. This book is ideally placed to achieve this.
The book is written as an introductory text, aimed at those new to the study of women’s
imprisonment. Each chapter follows a similar format, consisting of a discussion of a particular
theme, divided into clear sub-sections, which is followed by a short conclusion and by a glossary
of terms (that readers should ensure they know). Suggestions for further reading, topics for further
discussion and suggested essay questions are also provided. The design, therefore, renders a
chapter an ideal basis for an undergraduate seminar or project activity.
The introduction to the book clearly sets out what the authors will cover in it, and they are
upfront from the start about their own position that there should be a reduction in the levels of
women’s imprisonment. Chapter One covers the history of women’s imprisonment and the
prevailing attitudes, over time, towards it. Chapter Two goes on to explore how official statistics
record the levels of women’s imprisonment, and outlines the contemporary characteristics of
women in prison. Chapter Three raises the concept of a ‘healthy prison’, and examines how far
women in prison are in a safe, respectful and purposeful environment. The next three chapters are
mainly theoretical, outlining the key approaches to women’s imprisonment and presenting the
mainstream influential arguments about the justifications for the imprisonment of women and
the alternatives to custodial sentences. Chapter Six, in particular, presents a concise account of
the issues as they are perceived by feminist theorists.
A particular strength of the book is the inclusion of a final chapter that sets out the practical and
ethical issues for consideration when undertaking research into women’s imprisonment.
Conducting research in, and about, prisons is not easy. The prison environment is subject to
constant change and external political pressures, and prison staff have an additional risk to manage,
in addition to their ordinary responsibilities, with the arrival of researchers. By sharing their
experiences, the authors have attempted to ensure that meaningful research will be attempted
into this topic, one that can only benefit from closer scrutiny in the future.
The book might have benefited from a wider discussion about the effects of women’s imprisonment
not just on the women themselves but on their children and other family members. The imprisonment
of women has wide-ranging effects. Some of these effects are not as those that often result from the
imprisonment of men—for example, the loss of the primary caregiver, in addition to the family
home, for many children with mothers in prison. Acknowledgement of these wider effects as an
intrinsic part of the experience of many imprisoned women would enrich future debate.
On balance, the book is to be heartily recommended to anyone with a budding interest in women’s
imprisonment, as it will ensure that readers develop a good overall understanding of the field.
Karen Liang
Newcastle Centre for Family Studies
University of Newcastle
Article
Full-text available
In light of the dramatic increase over the past decade in the number of women incarcerated in the Netherlands, we examined 251 female inmates’ psychological reactions to imprisonment with a survey that taps importation and deprivation factors and related life experiences. While depressive complaints, irritability and risk of self-harm were all predicted by both sets of factors, the evidence suggests that deprivation factors have a greater impact on these measures of well-being than importation factors. Previous treatment for psychological problems was the most important covariate for psychological complaints and post-traumatic stress. The most important deprivation factors were treatment by staff and other inmates, and environmental stress. Accordingly, we suggest that in order to further our understanding of women prisoners’ adaptations to incarceration greater attention should be directed to women’s conditions of confinement and less to their histories of victimization and drug abuse.
Article
Similar to other Anglophone countries, Britain has followed the US and imprisoned an ever larger proportion of its population. Though Britain's prison population is dwarfed by the mass incarceration of the US, Britain holds the unenviable claim to incarcerate a higher proportion of its population than any other European country. As in the US, this rise in incarceration in Britain has little association with the crime rate. Prison statistics are compiled differently in the various countries of Britain, making aggregation diffi cult. Therefore, those held for England and Wales, where the vast majority of people within Britain reside, are commonly used as a guide for the nation as a whole. Between 1989 and 1992 Britain experienced a 50% increase in its crime rate, yet at the same time the prison population of England and Wales fell from 50 000 to 42 000.1
Article
Full-text available
Purpose . This paper considers the criminogenic needs of women offenders, raising the question of whether there may be women‐specific criminogenic needs. Arguments . The risk‐needs model of offending has become increasingly influential in both research and practice. Simply, the risk–needs model holds that some aspects of an individual's functioning are risk factors for offending. The distinction can be drawn between static and dynamic risk factors: the former are historical, the latter reflect current functioning and are amenable to change. These dynamic attributes linked to offending – such as financial status, emotional problems, and substance use – are referred to as criminogenic needs . Needs assessment instruments, such as the Level of Service Inventory‐Revised (LSI‐R; Andrews & Bonta, 1995 ) have been developed to assess criminogenic need and predict risk of offending. Much of the research informing the risk–needs model has been carried out with male offenders, leading to questions about the criminogenic needs of women offenders and whether there may be women‐specific criminogenic needs. Conclusion . An overview of typical criminogenic needs, as assessed by the LSI‐R, suggests that there are probably common needs for male and female offenders. A common need does not imply that aetiology or level of importance of that need is the same for men and women, while some events, such as physical and sexual abuse, are arguably criminogenic needs for women. The implications for practice and research of understanding more about women‐specific criminogenic needs are considered.
Article
Unlabelled: Two groups now constitute the fastest growing segment of the U.S. prison population: women and persons with mental illness. Few large-scale studies have explored associations among serious mental illness (SMI), gender, and recidivism, or compared factors such as illness severity and clinical history as these construct notably different situations for incarcerated women and men. We report on our recent study comparing prison recidivism rates, severity of mental illness, and clinical history for women and men released from Utah State Prison 1998-2002. Implications: While women generally have better recidivism outcomes than men, we find that SMI related factors have a greater negative effect on the trajectories of women in this sample as compared with the men. This suggests that programs and policies focused on the SMI-specific risks and needs of women could significantly reduce prison recidivism and increase community tenure for this group, with far-reaching effects for families and communities.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.