ArticlePDF Available

Patterns of human–crocodile conflict in Queensland: a review of historical estuarine crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) management

CSIRO Publishing
Wildlife Research
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Context In Queensland, the management of estuarine crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus) by the government is important for ensuring public safety, especially along the populated east coast, where there is a large human population. Aims The present study aimed to determine historical, temporal and spatial patterns of human–crocodile conflict in Queensland. Methods The study used Queensland Government records of estuarine crocodile attacks (1971–2015), sightings by the general public (2003–2015), and removals and relocations for management purposes (1985–2015) to develop General Linear Models describing historical, temporal and spatial patterns. Key results The highest number of attacks, sightings, removals and relocations occurred along the populated east coast between Townsville and the Daintree during wet season months (November–February). There have been 35 crocodile attacks in Queensland since 1971 (total 0.8 per year; fatal 0.3 per year), mostly involving local people or regular visitors (77.1%), specifically adult males (71.4%; mean age 44). There has been an increase in the rate of crocodile attacks over time, with an average of 1.3 per year since 1996, most of which were non-fatal (84%). The number of crocodile sightings has been increasing annually (with a mean of 348 per year since 2011), while the number of crocodiles removed or relocated for management purposes (n = 608) has fluctuating widely each year (range 1–57). Conclusions The level of human–crocodile conflict in Queensland is increasing, and this is likely to be a consequence of increasing human and crocodile populations. While conflict is highest during the wet season, estuarine crocodiles pose a threat to public safety year round. Implications With the increase in conflict, the ongoing management of estuarine crocodiles, through targeted removals in and around areas of higher human habitation and through education, is essential for ensuring public safety into the future.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Patterns of humancrocodile conict in Queensland: a review
of historical estuarine crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) management
M. L. Brien
A,D
, C. M. Gienger
B
, C. A. Browne
A
, M. A. Read
C
, M. J. Joyce
A
and S. Sullivan
A
A
Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, PO Box 375, Garbutt East LPO, Qld 4870, Australia.
B
Department of Biology and Center of Excellence for Field Biology, Austin Peay State University,
Clarksville, Tennessee 37044, USA.
C
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, PO Box 1379, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia.
D
Corresponding author. Email: matt.brien@ehp.qld.gov.au
Abstract
Context. In Queensland, the management of estuarine crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus) by the government is important
for ensuring public safety, especially along the populated east coast, where there is a large human population.
Aims. The present study aimed to determine historical, temporal and spatial patterns of humancrocodile conict in
Queensland.
Methods. The study used Queensland Government records of estuarine crocodile attacks (19712015), sightings by the
general public (20032015), and removals and relocations for management purposes (19852015) to develop General
Linear Models describing historical, temporal and spatial patterns.
Key results. The highest number of attacks, sightings, removals and relocations occurred along the populated east coast
between Townsville and the Daintree during wet season months (NovemberFebruary). There have been 35 crocodile
attacks in Queensland since 1971 (total 0.8 per year; fatal 0.3 per year), mostly involving local people or regular visitors
(77.1%), specically adult males (71.4%; mean age 44). There has been an increase in the rate of crocodile attacks over
time, with an average of 1.3 per year since 1996, most of which were non-fatal (84%). The number of crocodile sightings
has been increasing annually (with a mean of 348 per year since 2011), while the number of crocodiles removed or relocated
for management purposes (n= 608) has uctuating widely each year (range 157).
Conclusions. The level of humancrocodile conict in Queensland is increasing, and this is likely to be a consequence of
increasing human and crocodile populations. While conict is highest during the wet season, estuarine crocodiles pose a
threat to public safety year round.
Implications. With the increase in conict, the ongoing management of estuarine crocodiles, through targeted
removals in and around areas of higher human habitation and through education, is essential for ensuring public safety
into the future.
Additional keywords: attacks, removals, sightings.
Received 9 February 2017, accepted 24 June 2017, published online 29 August 2017
Introduction
The estuarine crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) is the largest (up to
6 m) and most widely distributed crocodilian, and is found in
coastal waterways from Sri Lanka in the west, throughout south-
east Asia to the Caroline Islands in the east, and down to northern
Australia (Webb and Manolis 1989). This species is considered
the most territorial and least tolerant of conspecics (Lang
1987; Brien et al.2013a), and along with the Nile crocodile
(C. niloticus), accounts for the highest number of crocodilian
attacks on humans each year (Caldicott et al.2005; CrocBITE
The Worldwide Crocodilian Attack Data-Base, available at
http://www.crocodile-attack.info, accessed 12 September 2015).
As such, effective management of estuarine crocodile populations
is critical in places where range and habitat use overlap.
The worldwide status of estuarine crocodiles is listed as Low
Risk and of Least Concern (2009 IUCN Red List), with large
stable populations in Australia, Papua New Guinea and Indonesia
(Webb et al.2010). In Australia, populations in the Northern
Territory and Western Australia are large and increasing, while
recovery in Queensland has been more modest and patchy
since implementation of protective measures (Webb et al.
2010). Densities in Queensland are generally low but variable
across the state when compared with the Northern Territory,
with the highest densities in rivers along north-west Cape York
Peninsula and Lakeeld National Park (Taplin 1987; Read et al.
2004).
Estuarine crocodiles are found in coastal waterways and
associated wetlands throughout north Queensland, including
CSIRO PUBLISHING
Wildlife Research,2017, 44, 281290
https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17011
Journal compilation CSIRO 2017 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/wr
offshore islands and up to 100 km inland (Taplin 1987). Breeding
populations are known from the Fitzroy River, south of
Rockhampton, on the east coast, north to the Torres Strait
and into the Gulf of Carpentaria (Taplin 1987; Messel et al.
1981). However, individuals are also known in waterways as
far south as the Mary River on the east coast, and are not
uncommon on offshore islands (Miller and Bell 1997). Along
the populated east coast, signicant habitat alteration for
agriculture and urban development has occurred, and it is here
where most humancrocodile conict occurs (Taplin 1987;
Kofron 2004).
Management of estuarine crocodiles in Queensland is the
responsibility of the Government (currently Department of
Environment and Heritage Protection) under the Nature
Conservation Act of 1992 and currently the Nature Conservation
(Estuarine Crocodile)Plan of 2007. Historically, unregulated
hunting of estuarine crocodiles occurred until they were
protected in 1974 (Taplin 1987), with the species currently
state listed as Vulnerable, due to the impacts of threatening
processes such as urban and rural development. Estuarine
crocodiles that pose a threat to human safety have been
captured and removed by the Government since the mid-late
1980s. However, crocodile management policies in Queensland
have changed over time in response to both changes of
government and community and political pressure resulting
from increased crocodile sightings and/or attacks.
In this study, we reviewed historical records of estuarine
crocodile attacks, sightings, removals and relocations for
management purposes to determine patterns of humancrocodile
conict in Queensland. The main objective was to determine the
effect of time, location and season on the frequency of estuarine
crocodile attacks, sightings, removals and relocations to inform
management programs.
Materials and methods
Distribution and habitat
The study area included all coastal waterways estuarine
crocodiles are known to inhabit in Queensland, from the Mary
River near Bundaberg on the south-east coast (2530043.1900S
15245028.5000E), north to the tip of Cape York Peninsula,
including the Torres Strait (1011057.0600S 1421602.1400 E),
and down through the Gulf of Carpentaria to the Northern
Territory border (1632033.3000S137
59041.0000E), including all
offshore islands (Fig. 1). However, breeding populations are
only known as far south on the east coast as the Fitzroy River
near Rockhampton (Taplin 1987; Fig. 1). For the purposes of
analysis, the coast of Queensland north of the Mary River
Zone 1
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 3
Zone 2
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Torres Strait
Wenlock R.
Mitchell
R.
Norman
R.
Gulf of
Carpentaria
Weipa
Escape R.
Lockhart R.
Mackay
Boyne R.
Endeavour R.
Daintree R.
Barron R.
Russel R.
Johnstone R.
Hull R.
Proserpine R.
Fitzroy R.
0250 500 Km
N
Rockhampton
Bundaberg
Brisbane
Lakefield Id National Park
Cooktown
South Pacific Ocean
Cairns
Townsville
Breeding distribution
Fig. 1. Breeding distribution of estuarine crocodiles in Queensland (Taplin 1987). The state is
divided into 11 broadly dened management zones.
282 Wildlife Research M. L. Brien et al.
around to the Northern Territory border was divided into 11
broadly dened management areas, based on the main estuarial
river systems and associated urban centres (Fig. 1). Historically,
this is also how the coastline has broadly been delineated
with regards to crocodile management. These distances refer to
approximate linear coastline and do not include lengths of inland
waterways. However, management of crocodiles extends inland,
generally up to 20 m above sea level where the majority of the
crocodile populations exist.
Area 1: Wide Bay (Fraser Island,Mary River, Maryborough,
Great Sandy Strait, Hervey Bay, Bundaberg) 150 km.
Area 2: Fitzroy (Benaraby, Tannum Sands, Gladstone,
Rockhampton, Emu Park, Yeppoon, Byeld) 140 km.
Area 3: Mackay (Carmila, Sarina, Mackay, Eimeo, Seaforth,
Lethebrook, Proserpine, Airlie Beach, Bowen) 330 km.
Area 4: Townsville (Home Hill, Giru, Barrata Creek,
Alligator Creek, Magnetic Island, Ross River, Bohle
River, Bushland beach, Toolakea, Bluewater, Toomulla,
Balgal Beach) 200 km.
Area 5: Hinchinbrook (Forrest Beach, Taylors Beach,
Halifax, Macknade, Lucinda, Hinchinbrook, Cardwell,
Edmund Kennedy NP) 80 km.
Area 6: Innisfail (Tully, Mission Beach, Wongaling, Bingil
bay, Garners Beach, Kurrimine Beach, Cowley Beach,
Mourilyan, Etty Bay, Johnstone, Flying Fish Point) 70 km.
Area 7: Cairns (Bramston Beach, Eubanangee Swamp,
Babinda, Deeral, Russel/Mulgrave, Edmonton, Cairns,
Northern beaches, Ellis Beach) 100 km.
Area 8: Port Douglas (Mowbray, Port Douglas, Cooya
Beach, Newell Beach, Wonga beach, Mossman, Daintree,
Cow Bay) 50 km.
Area 9: Cape Tribulation-Cooktown (Cape Tribulation,
Wujal, Bloomeld, Archer Point, Cooktown, Hopevale)
80 km.
Area 10: East Cape-Torres Strait (Hopevale-Crystal Creek
including the Torres Strait) 1100 km.
Area 11: WestCape-Gulf (SkardonRiver-NorthernTerritory
border) 1000 km .
Within the broad latitudinal range that encompasses
estuarine crocodile habitat in Queensland, eight separate
bioregions have been identied (Taplin 1987). These include
the low-lying, arid Gulf Plains (Southern and Northern), hot
and wet Cape York Peninsula (North-west and North-east),
large wetland systems of Lakeeld National Park, coastal
fringes of the East Coast Plains, from the tropical northern
reaches (Cape Melville to Cooktown and Cooktown to Ayr),
to the sub-tropical and arid areas in the south (AyrGladstone).
All of these regions are characterised by a winter dry season
(AprilOctober), dened by low rainfall and cooler temperatures
and a summer wet season (NovemberMarch), during which
conditions are hot, humid and most precipitation occurs. Annual
rainfall is highly variable, ranging from 7001000 mm in parts
of the south-western Gulf to 30004000 mm in tropical areas
of the East Coast Plains (e.g. Innisfail). The summer wet
season also corresponds with the breeding season for
C. porosus, with nesting triggered by large rainfall events
(Webb et al.1977).
Human population
Although there are large tracts of pristine coastal habitat north
of Cooktown and around the Cape into the Gulf, there has been
intensive urban and agricultural (e.g. sugarcane) development
along the East Coast Plains south of Cooktown. According to the
Queensland Government Statisticians Ofce (http://statistics.
qgso.qld.gov.au/qld-regional-proles?; accessed 30 June 2016),
populations in the major local government areas along the East
Coast Plains in 2015 are estimated as (from south to north):
Bundaberg (94 453); Rockhampton (81 589); Mackay (117 703);
Townsville (192 058); Hinchinbrook (10 990); Cassowary Coast
(29 396); Cairns (162 451); Douglas (11 997); and Cook (4 424).
A few studies have suggested that human disturbance in
catchment areas may be the dominant factor limiting crocodile
population recovery along the east coast (Taplin 1987; Kofron
and Smith 2001; Read et al.2004). However, Fukuda et al.(2007)
concluded that habitat availability was the dominant inuence on
successful recovery of the species in Queensland from the impact
of commercial hunting (protection began in 1974). Queensland
essentially has far less suitable nesting habitat available for
estuarine crocodiles than the Northern Territory (Fukuda et al.
2007).
Cultural attitudes to crocodiles in Queensland vary among
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander groups, with some
traditionally hunting crocodiles and their eggs for food while
others regard the crocodile as a totem animal or a spirit of
ancestors. The rights of indigenous people to continue to hunt
or use estuarine crocodiles as they have traditionally done so are
recognised. With regards to managing problem crocodiles,
cultural beliefs are taken into consideration when making
decisions. For example, if a problem crocodile is captured that
is larger than 4 m, it is recognised as an iconcrocodile and the
department is required to formally consult with the traditional
owners and enter into an agreement as to the fate of the animal.
Estuarine crocodile population
The population of estuarine crocodiles in Queensland has
increased since protection in 1974, but this increase has been
lower than in the Northern Territory and Western Australia
(Taplin 1987;Readet al.2004). The most recent comprehensive
survey of the state occurred 19942000 and included 103
waterways (4174.3 km) between Gladstone, Rockhampton and
the Northern Territory border (Read et al.2004). The results
indicated that crocodile numbers were generally low and highly
variable across the state, with 91% of all animals sighted being
less than the minimum breeding size for the species (Read et al.
2004). The population had undergone a limited recovery, with
the highest numbers recorded from waterways in north-west
Cape York Peninsula and Lakeeld National Park, and low
densities along the populated east coast. However, trends in
population abundance and biomass since these surveys in the
late 1990s and early 2000s are not well understood due to a lack
of survey data. Freshwater crocodiles (C. johnstoni) also inhabit
many of the same river systems as C. porosus in Queensland,
although they are often found further inland (Taplin 1987),
and considered a consequence of interspecic aggression with
C. porosus (Brien et al.2013b). Freshwater crocodiles were not
Estuarine crocodile management in Queensland Wildlife Research 283
included in this study. Due to their smaller size, they pose little
threat to humans, with very few attacks recorded.
History of estuarine crocodile management
Crocodile management in Queensland has generally involved
the removal of crocodiles (>2 m) deemed to be a threat to safety
of humans, livestock or working dogs. Crocodiles have been
captured using either a trap (oating, gate) or with a harpoon, and
either removed and placed at a suitable facility (farm, zoo) for
breeding stock, or translocated to other sections of the river or
to other systems such as Lakeeld National Park (199597).
However, this practice was discontinued in 1999 because
estuarine crocodiles are known to homeback to their capture
site, often travelling long distances (Walsh and Whitehead 1993;
Kay 2004; Read et al.2007). Intensive removal programs
have also been in place along the populated east coast from:
19871991; 19982006; and 201215.
In late 1987, the East Coast Crocodile Management
Program (ECCMP: 19871991) was introduced state-wide in
response to community concerns that there had been an increase
in crocodile sightings, along with several attacks (19801986:
ve fatal, one non-fatal). Three zones were established that
dictated the type of management response: (1) all crocodiles
removed; (2) all crocodiles >1.2 m removed; and (3) removed if
posing a threat. During this period private contractors were also
called on by the government to remove crocodiles in designated
areas.
In 1998, the Trial Intense Management Area for Crocodiles
(TIMAC) (Read et al.2004) was established in the Cairns region
(Trinity Inlet north to Wonga beach), again in response to
community concerns about an increase in crocodile sightings,
along with several attacks (199397: one fatal, two non-fatal).
All crocodiles and crocodile eggs found in the designated
TIMAC waterways were removed during the trial (19982001).
The plan also included the removal of all crocodiles from areas
of the Russell, Mulgrave, North Johnstone and South Johnstone
rivers west of the Bruce Highway. In 2001, the program was
extended as the Intensive Management Area for Crocodiles
(IMAC) program (200106). The Croc-wiseeducational
campaign was also introduced by the Government in 2001,
which involved the delivery of educational talks to the public,
with a focus on schools.
In 2007, the Nature Conservation (Estuarine Crocodile)
Conservation Plan 2007 and Management program 200717
came into effect. In 2009, it was also decided that any
crocodiles south of the Boyne River should be removed. In
2011, the Government began reporting all crocodile sightings
and declared crocodiles of concernon its website (www.ehp.
qld.gov.au), which was regularly updated. In 2012, Crocodile
Urban Management Areas (CUMAs) were introduced in
Gladstone, Mackay, and Rockhampton, in which all crocodiles
>2 m in length were to be removed. In 2013, trial Crocodile
Management Plans (CMPs) were introduced for the
Cairns, Townsville, Hinchinbrook and Cassowary Coast local
government areas. These areas were chosen because they
experience a higher level of potential crocodilehuman conict
(sightings, removals, attacks) than other population centres on
the east coast, due to the larger size of both the human and
crocodile populations. The plans set out a risk-based approach
to crocodile management consisting of three different zones:
Zone 1: prevent crocodiles from entering the zone and
remove all crocodiles that enter into it; Zone 2: remove all
crocodiles 2 m or any crocodile displaying aggressive
behaviour; and Zone 3: remove crocodiles of concern.
This current approach to crocodile management in
Queensland was largely derived from the Northern Territory
model, in which crocodiles are more intensively managed and
actively targeted for removal in and around urban centres (e.g.
Darwin harbour). Along the populated east coast of Queensland
between Cairns and Rockhampton, crocodiles 2 m are targeted
for removal in and around several urban centres, with all
crocodiles proactively removed from the Cairns area. The
main difference between the Northern Territory and Queensland
is the larger human population located in areas with healthy
populations of crocodiles (Kofron 2004).
Data reduction and analyses
We used Queensland Government records to develop General
Linear Models describing historical, temporal and spatial patterns
of recorded crocodile attacks, sightings, removals and relocations
in Queensland. We assigned each record to one of 11 management
areas based on location of observation (Fig. 1) and collated data
for year, month, sex (if known), crocodile body size (estimated
from sightings, measured for captures), and crocodile attack
outcome (fatal or non-fatal attack). As time of day was difcult
to determine accurately for the majority of attacks, we did not
attempt to examine or report on it. In comparing sex ratios of
captured crocodiles we used chi-square tests. Recorded estuarine
crocodile attacks on humans (non-fatal and fatal) have been
reliably recorded by the government since 1971, and analyses
included all recorded attacks from 1971 to 2015. We also
conrmed records and cross-referenced information on attacks
from The Worldwide Crocodilian Attack Data Base, CrocBITE.
Estuarine crocodile sightings have been reported to the
government since the 1980s, but before 2003 reports were not
always led and the facility for the public to report sightings
was limited. Therefore, only sighting data from 2003 to 2015
were included in the analyses. Crocodile removals (including
euthanised animals) and relocations have been recorded by the
government since 1985, and analyses included all data from
1985 to 2015. Minimum monthly air temperature data for
Cairns (Cairns AERO station 031011; 16.87S; 145.75E;
Bureau of Meteorology 2016) was compared with monthly
attack, sighting and capture data.
Results
Attacks
There have been 35 crocodile attacks recorded in Queensland
since 1971 (mean 0.8 per year), 12 of which were fatal (34.3%;
0.3 per year). In one instance, a second person was also injured
by the crocodile attempting to help the victim. Total length
was recorded for 24 of the 35 attacking crocodiles (68.6%),
with the mean size of crocodiles involved in fatal attacks
(4.1 0.22 m s.e.; range 2.75.0 m; n= 9) being signicantly
larger (F
1,21
= 23.14; P= 0.0001) than those involved in non-
fatal attacks (2.5 0.21 m s.e.; range 1.24.2 m; n= 15; Fig. 2a).
284 Wildlife Research M. L. Brien et al.
Most attacks involved local people or people from north
Queensland who regularly visited the area (n= 27; 77.1%),
with two non-locals and six unknown. Adult males (mean age
44.2 3.33 s.e.; range 2475; n= 25) were the most common
victims (71.4%), with four attacks on children (two males, two
females; ages 511), three on teenagers (all males; ages 1519),
and three on adult females (ages 3148; Fig. 2b). Only two
victims were identied as aboriginal, although race was not
identied for seven victims. Most victims were attacked in the
water or on the edge (88.6%), with two attacks on people in
canoes and two on people in tents. Most people were engaged in
some form of recreational activity at the time. Attacks occurred
between Innisfail on the east coast through to Normanton in the
Gulf. The highest number of attacks occurred in and around
rivers on the populated east coast between Cairns (n= 7; 1 fatal)
and the Port Douglas area (n= 6; 2 fatal; Fig. 3). Several attacks
also occurred in Weipa (n= 4; 1 fatal) and on offshore islands,
including the Torres Strait (n= 4; non-fatal; Mt Adolphus Island
2006, 2007, MacArthur Islands 1999 and Thursday Island
2004) and Lizard Island near Cooktown (n= 2; 2009, 2015).
There has been a signicant increase (r
2
= 0.61; P<0.0001)
in the overall rate of crocodile attacks recorded over time with a
mean of 1.3 per year since 1996, most of which were non-fatal
(84%; Fig. 4). Prior to 1996, the mean rate of attack was 0.4
per year (19711995), with most attacks being fatal (80%; Fig. 4).
The mean size of crocodiles responsible for attacks has not
changed signicantly over time (r
2
= 0.48; P= 0.47).
The distribution of attacks was not signicantly different
across months (x
2
= 8.30; d.f. = 10; P= 0.60), but attacks were
more frequent December through February (Fig. 5a). The mean
size of crocodiles responsible for attacks was not different
across months of the year (F
10,12
= 0.88; P= 0.57).
Sightings
In total, 3419 crocodile sightings were reported to the
government from 2003 to 2015, with location recorded for
3223. Most sightings originated from the populated east coast
between Ayr and Cape Tribulation (Areas 48: 73.6%; Fig. 3).
The number of reports differed signicantly among areas
(F
10,995
= 33.4; P<0.0001) and was highest for Cairns (Area
7: 888; 27.6%; 68 per year), Innisfail (Area 6: 428; 13.3%; 33 per
year), Port Douglas (Area 8: 394; 12.2%; 30 per year), Townsville
(Area 4: 371; 11.5%; 29 per year) and Hinchinbrook (Area 5:
290; 9.0%; 22 per year), with 90 reports from offshore islands
(Fig. 3).
Along the east coast, estuarine crocodiles have been reported
as far south as Inskip Point, south of Fraser Island (Fig. 3).
However, the southern-most sightings, conrmed by the
government, were from the Mary River, Maryborough (Fig. 3).
Some individuals have been reported up to 300 km inland near
Georgetown, and at elevations up to 200 m in the upper reaches
of the Burdekin and North Johnstone Rivers. However, the
highest conrmed sighting of an estuarine crocodile (~2 m) is
from Adeline Creek near the Daintree at 470 m above sea level
(169021.4000S 1454057.2500 E; 15 May 2012; C. Hoskins). To
travel to this location, the crocodile had to traverse several steep
sections of river, including waterfalls.
The number of crocodile sightings has been increasing
signicantly each year (F
1,11
= 29.44; r
2
= 0.72; P= 0.0002),
with a mean of 347.6 12.6 s.e. since 2011, and a maximum
of 426 in 2015 (Fig. 6). Despite high variability, this trend was
consistent across most locations, with the greatest increase in
sightings occurring from around Cairns (Area 7).
Sightings have been reported throughout the year with
signicant differences among months (F
11,995
=2.51; P=0.004).
Sightings were highest during wet season months (October
February), when mean air temperatures were warmer, and
lowest during dry season months (MayAugust; Fig. 5b).
Removals and relocations
In total, 608 estuarine crocodiles have been captured and either
removed and placed at a facility (n= 552), relocated or released
in-situ (n= 46) or euthanised (n= 10) since 1985. Crocodiles
were captured from coastal areas from the Mary River in the
south along the populated east coast and Cape York through
to Normanton in the Gulf, including the Torres Strait (Fig. 2).
However, the number of crocodiles captured differed signicantly
among areas (F
10,135
= 2.61; P= 0.006; location recorded for
597), with most captured from waterways between Hinchinbrook
and Port Douglas (Areas 58; 75%; Fig. 2). Crocodile captures
were highest for Cairns (Area 7: 181; 5.8 per year; 30.3%),
Innisfail (Area 6: 116; 3.7 per year; 19.4%), Hinchinbrook
(Area 5: 85; 2.7 per year; 14.2%), and Port Douglas (Area 8:
66; 2.1 per year; 11.1%; Fig. 2).
10
8
6
4
2
0
1–2.0
<13 14–19 20–30 31–40 41–50 51–60 >60
2.1–3.0 3.1–4.0 4.1–5.0
Fatal
Non-fatal
10
8
6
4
2
0
Number of crocodile attack victims
Total length of crocodile (metres)
(a)
(b)
A
g
e of victims (
y
ears)
Female
Male
Fig. 2. Size of estuarine crocodiles involved in attacks on people in
Queensland, and the age and sex of victims (19712015). The number of
victims according to (a) total length of estuarine crocodiles (metres) involved
in non-fatal and fatal attacks and (b) age and sex of victims of crocodile attack.
Estuarine crocodile management in Queensland Wildlife Research 285
A mean of 19.6 2.3 s.e. crocodiles have been captured
per year but this has been highly variable, uctuating between
one per year (1993) up to 57 per year (2014; Fig. 7). However,
capture rates did not differ signicantly among years
(F
30,115
= 0.87; P= 0.65).
The mean number of crocodiles removed and relocated did
not differ signicantly across months of the year (F
11,325
= 0.84;
P= 0.60), but the highest numbers were recorded between
NovemberJanuary (breeding or wet season), when mean air
temperatures were warmer, with fewer captures in July and
August (non-breeding or dry season) (Fig. 5c).
Of the total number of crocodiles captured (n= 608), sex was
determined for 455 individuals (74.8%), with a signicantly
(x
2
= 20.12; P= 0.043) higher proportion of males captured
(75.6%). However, the percentage of crocodiles for which sex
was determined has declined over time from 95.3% (1985
2003) to 50% (200415). The mean size of males captured
(mean 2948.6 46.94 mm TL; range 8904800 mm TL; n= 344)
was signicantly larger than for females captured (mean
2124.1 53.51 mm TL; range 3103400 mm TL; n= 111;
F
1,362
= 48.71; P<0.0001). Of the crocodiles captured, 32.6%
of females were of breeding size (>2.3 m) (Webb and Manolis
1989), 39.2% of males were of breeding size (>3.3 m; Webb
and Manolis 1989) and only 13.1% were >4 m in length.
Discussion
Most recorded estuarine crocodile attacks, sightings and
captures for management purposes have occurred on the
populated east coast of Queensland between Townsville and
Zone 1
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 3
Zone 2
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Torres Strait
Gulf of
Carpentaria
Weipa
Mackay
0250 500 Km
N
Rockhampton
Bundaberg
Brisbane
Cooktown
South Pacific Ocean
Cairns
Townsville
Fatal attacks
Non-fatal attacks
Captures
Sightings
Normanton
Fig. 3. Distribution of recorded estuarine crocodile attacks, sightings and removals and relocations
in Queensland. Attacks: 19712015, sightings: 200315, and removals and relocations: 19852015.
2.0 Fatal
Non-fatal
Regression line
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
1971–1975
1976–1980
1981–1985
1986–1990
1991–1995
1996–2000
2001–2005
2006–2010
2011–2015
Mean number of crocodile
attack victims
Year
Fig. 4. Mean number of crocodile attacks (fatal and non-fatal) recorded in
Queensland (19712015). Attacks are grouped into 5-year intervals.
Regression line refers to all attacks.
286 Wildlife Research M. L. Brien et al.
the Port Douglas area. These locations have large human
populations (e.g. Cairns: 160 285; Queensland Government
Statisticians Ofce 2016) in the middle of known crocodile
habitat, which is why management efforts have been focused
in these areas. In Florida (USA), a similar situation exists
where the highest number of complaints and bites from
American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) occurs in
areas where the highest human populations exist (Woodward
et al.2014).
The highest number of recorded estuarine crocodile attacks,
sightings and captures occurred during the summer wet season
(NovemberFebruary), which also corresponds with the breeding
season for estuarine crocodiles (Webb et al.1977; Webb and
Manolis 1989). During summer months, ambient temperatures
8
6
4
2
0
35
24
22
20
18
16
24
22
20
18
16
24
22
20
18
16
30
25
20
15
10
5
5
5678
Month
(a)
(b)
(c)
9101112
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
0
Number of crocodile
attack victims
Mean number of crocodile
sightings (±s.e.)
Mean min. air temperature (°C)
Mean number of crocodile
removals (±s.e.)
Fig. 5. Recorded estuarine crocodile attacks, sightings and removals and relocations throughout
the year in Queensland. Monthly estuarine crocodile (a) attacks (19712015), (b) mean sightings
(s.e.; 200315) and (c) mean captures (s.e.; 19852015) in Queensland compared with mean
minimum air temperature for Cairns, Queensland (Bureau of Meteorology 2016).
Estuarine crocodile management in Queensland Wildlife Research 287
are warmer, water levels are higher and individuals are dispersing
out onto ood plains hunting prey (Webb et al.1977; Webb and
Manolis 1989). It is also a time when adults tend to be more mobile
in pursuit of breeding partners, and can also become more
aggressive, especially females in defence of a nest or young
(Webb and Manolis 1989). During the summer wet season, people
are coincidentally frequenting waterways for the purposes of
cooling off, or for other recreational activities such as boating
and shing, bringing them into closer proximity with crocodiles.
In Florida, alligator attacks also increase during the
warmer summer months when recreational water use is highest
(Woodward et al.2014), while alligator complaints and
removals in Louisiana (USA) also peak during springsummer
and decline considerably in winter (Hines and Woodward 1980;
Boundy 2004). In South Africa and Swaziland, 90% of attacks
by Nile crocodiles have also occurred during the summer
breeding season (19492014; Pooley 2014). In the Northern
Territory the pattern is slightly different, with most crocodiles
captured and removed during the beginning (September
December) and end (MarchApril) of the wet season, which is
also when most attacks occur (Fukuda et al. 2014).
There have been 35 crocodile attacks recorded in Queensland
since 1971 (0.8 per year), with 34.3% fatal (0.3 per year) and
the mean size of crocodiles responsible for fatal attacks (4.1 m)
larger than that for non-fatal (2.5 m). This proportion of fatalities
is consistent with what has been reported for C. porosus
throughout the rest of Australia, but much lower than has been
reported between 200714 in Timor-Leste (83% fatal), Papua
New Guinea (76% fatal) and Solomon Islands (73% fatal;
Manolis and Webb 2014). While this could be a consequence
of higher water use for essential daily activities (e.g. washing),
putting human residents at greater risk, it could also be that
non-fatal attacks are under-reported or undocumented in these
countries (Manolis and Webb 2014).
Most attacks in Queensland have involved local people or
people from north Queensland who regularly visited the area
(77.1%), specically adult men (mean age 44), and almost all
occurred in the water or on the edge (88.6%). Local adult men
have also been the most common victims of estuarine crocodile
attacks recorded in the Northern Territory (Fukuda et al.2014),
and of alligator bites in Florida (81.8%) (Woodward et al.2014).
The predominance of local adult male victims in Australia and
the USA is likely related to higher recreational water use and
risk-taking behaviour. Males also account for the highest
number of drownings in Australia each year (~80%), mostly
between the ages of 1854 (Royal Life Saving Society Australia
2014). In contrast, the most common victim of Nile crocodile
(C. niloticus) attacks in South Africa and Swaziland have been
children and teens <20 years old (19492014; Pooley 2014).
There has been an increase in the rate of crocodile attacks
recorded in Queensland over time, with an average of 1.3 per year
since 1996, most of which were non-fatal (84%). In the Northern
Territory, the rate of attacks has also increased over time,
particularly non-fatal cases (19712013: 18 fatal and 45
non-fatal) with an average of 1.5 per year (Fukuda et al.
2014). This increase in the Northern Territory has been related
2002
500
400
300
200
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Year
Number of crocodile sightings
Fig. 6. Estuarine crocodile sightings reported to the government each year
(200315).
60 Relocated
Removed
50
40
30
20
10
0
1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
Year
Number of crocodiles
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
Fig. 7. Number of crocodiles removed (captured, euthanised) and relocated each year by the government
(19852015).
288 Wildlife Research M. L. Brien et al.
to the increasing crocodile and human populations, and to the size
of individual crocodiles capable of attack (Fukuda et al.2014).
In Queensland, while crocodile numbers are lower and the
rate of recovery slower than in the Northern Territory, the human
population is considerably larger and steadily increasing, with
human populations in the two largest cities in northern
Queensland (Townsville: 193 946; Cairns: 160 285) increasing
by 25% between 2005 and 2015 (Queensland Government
Statisticians Ofce 2016). People in both Queensland and the
Northern Territory are also increasingly able to access remote
areas for the purposes of recreation. Increases in the human
population, recreational water use and access to remote areas
have also been attributed to the recent increase in non-fatal shark
attacks in Australia (19902000: 6.5 per year; 200111: 15
per year; West 2011).
It is important to put the number of deaths by crocodiles in
Australia each year into perspective. Most recorded crocodile
attacks have occurred in the Northern Territory (63%), followed
by Queensland (24%) and Western Australia (13%), with a
national increase in non-fatal cases from 0.1 per year (1971
1980) to 3.3 per year (200104) but no increase in fatal cases,
which have remained at 0.5 per year (Caldicott et al.2005). This
is relatively low when compared with the number of shark
attacks in Australia per year (15 per year; 1.1 per year fatal:
200110) (West 2011) and the number of deaths through beach
drownings in Australia each year (48 per year nationally; nine
per year in Queensland: 200313; Royal Life Saving Society
Australia 2014). Regardless, fear of being eaten tends to drive
public concerns and attitudes towards species such as crocodiles.
Conrmed sightings of estuarine crocodiles have been
reported as far south as the Mary River near Hervey Bay on
the east coast and as early as the 1990s, with unconrmed
sightings further south in the Great Sandy Strait down to Tin
Can Bay (~50 km south). This area represents the southern extent
for the species, with historical records indicating crocodiles
have always been present here but in low numbers, probably
due to climate constraints.
The presence of large estuarine crocodiles (24 m) in upper
freshwater sections of rivers (up to 470 m above sea level)
along the north-east coast and on or near offshore islands,
where there have been six recorded attacks, is of particular
concern for management. These areas are considered marginal
habitat for crocodiles, but are commonly used by people for
swimming and other water-based recreational activities, some of
whom may be unaware that estuarine crocodiles can be present.
While upstream movements by estuarine crocodiles have
been linked to social pressure from an increasing crocodile
population in the Northern Territory (Letnic and Connors
2006), the population of estuarine crocodiles along the east
coast of Queensland remains low. Therefore, it is unclear why
some individuals venture this far upstream in Queensland (up
to 470 m above sea level) as it requires signicant energy
expenditure to navigate the shallow, rocky and steep sections
of river, temperatures are cooler, food is limited and the clear
water can hinder hunting success. Estuarine crocodiles in the
Northern Territory have only been reported up to 126 m above
sea level (Letnic and Connors 2006).
The increase in crocodile sightings in Queensland over
time may indicate an increase in either human or crocodile
populations, or both. However, the situation is complicated
by several factors: improved reporting and data management
by the government; the location of the sighting; whether it is a
public place; the size of the crocodile reported; and the level
and type of media coverage. Sightings cannot, therefore, be
considered a good indicator of population size or change, and
as a consequence, it is not possible to draw any conclusions as
to whether there has been a change in crocodile numbers
across the state, whether more crocodiles are occurring on
offshore islands, or if the population is increasing or expanding
further south.
In total, 562 estuarine crocodiles have been removed
(captured, euthanised) from Queensland waterways for
management purposes since 1985, most coming from the
populated east coast. This is a relatively low number of
crocodiles removed each year (18 per year), which appears to
have been easily compensated by recruitment in most areas. In
comparison, 5792 estuarine crocodiles were removed from the
Northern Territory between 1977 and 2013 (Fukuda et al.
2014), ~161 per year, with most removed from Darwin
Harbour. This difference reects the larger crocodile population
in the Northern Territory, which is considered to be at or above
carrying capacity (Fukuda et al.2014).
The majority of Queensland crocodiles removed between
1985 and 2015 were male (75.6%), and most of these were
less than breeding size (<3.3 m: 60.8%) with only 13.1%
larger than 4 m. Similarly, in the Northern Territory, 69% of
problem estuarine crocodiles removed were male (19772013;
Fukuda et al.2014), and in the USA, ~75% of problem
A. mississippiensis removals and attacks involved males (King
and Elsey 2014; Woodward et al.2014). Subadult male
crocodilians are often nomadic, highly mobile (Tucker et al.
1998; Campbell et al.2013) and more likely to come into
conict with people. As female crocodilians are known to
mate with multiple partners and store sperm (Lewis et al.
2013), the removal of subadult males is unlikely to be a
signicant threat to the overall breeding potential of most
crocodilian populations.
The aim of any management program involving estuarine
crocodiles is to strike a balance between conservation and
management. The overall purpose is to minimise the chance of
humancrocodile conict while not negatively impacting
upon the crocodile population as a whole. This is achieved by
reducing the number of crocodiles in and around areas where
there are high human populations, while at the same time
preserving crocodile numbers in sparsely populated remote
areas, coupled with public education. The current program in
Queensland largely achieves this goal.
Conicts of interest
The authors declare no conicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
This study used data collected by the Queensland Government, or those
contracted by the government, for the purposes of estuarine crocodile
(Crocodylus porosus) management. All management activities were
authorised under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 and strictly adhered to
the Queensland GovernmentsCode of Practice taking,handling,and
transportation of crocodiles (including previous versions). We would like to
Estuarine crocodile management in Queensland Wildlife Research 289
acknowledge the assistance of various government staff over the years in the
collection and entry of data, in particular Lucy Evans and Carly Williams.
Grahame Webb, Yusuke Fukuda, Laurence Taplin and Amanda OMalley
provided valuable feedback on early drafts of the manuscript. We would also
like to thank the Department of Environment and Heritage for their support
and encouragement in producing this manuscript, and Conrad Hoskins for
providing the details of an estuarine crocodile at 470 m above sea level,
including a photograph.
References
Boundy, J. (2004). Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Report. p.
15. Louisiana Nuisance Alligator Program, Department of Wildlife and
Fisheries, Baton Rouge, LA.
Brien, M. L., Lang, J. W., Webb, G. J., Stevenson, C., and Christian, K. A.
(2013a). The good, the bad, and the ugly: agonistic behaviour in juvenile
crocodilians. PLoS One 8, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080872
Brien, M. L., Webb, G. J., Lang, J. W., and Christian, K. A. (2013b). Intra- and
interspecic agonistic behaviour in hatchling Australian freshwater
crocodiles (Crocodylus johnstoni) and saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus
porosus). Australian Journal of Zoology 61, 196205. doi:10.1071/
ZO13035
Bureau of Meteorology (2016). Climate statistics for Australian locations.
Cairns AERO station 031011; 16.87S; 145.75E. Commonwealth of
Australia. Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/
cw_031011.shtml [veried 12 September 2015].
Caldicott, D. G., Croser, D., Manolis, C., Webb, G., and Britton, A. (2005).
Crocodile attack in Australia: an analysis of its incidence and review of
the pathology and management of crocodilian attacks in general.
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 16, 143159. doi:10.1580/
1080-6032(2005)16[143:CAIAAA]2.0.CO;2
Campbell, H. A., Dwyer, R. G., Irwin, T. R., and Franklin, C. E. (2013). Home
range utilisation and long-range movement of estuarine crocodiles
during the breeding and nesting season. PLoS One 8, doi:10.1371/
journal.pone.0062127
Fukuda, Y., Whitehead, P., and Boggs, G. (2007). Broad-scale environmental
inuences on the abundance of saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus
porosus) in Australia. Wildlife Research 34, 167176. doi:10.1071/
WR06110
Fukuda, Y., Manolis, C., and Appel, K. (2014). Management of human
crocodile conict in the Northern Territory, Australia: review of crocodile
attacks and removal of problem crocodiles. The Journal of Wildlife
Management 78, 12391249. doi:10.1002/jwmg.767
Hines, T. C., and Woodward, A. R. (1980). Nuisance alligator control in
Florida. Wildlife Society Bulletin 8, 234241.
Kay, W. R. (2004). Movements and home ranges of radio-tracked Crocodylus
porosus in the Cambridge Gulf region of Western Australia. Wildlife
Research 31, 495508. doi:10.1071/WR04037
King, R., and Elsey, R. (2014). Louisianas nuisance alligator program. In
Proceedings of the 23rd Working Meeting of the Crocodile Specialist
Group, Louisiana, USA, 2630 May 2014. pp. 163181. (IUCN The
World Conservation Union: Gland, Switzerland.)
Kofron, C. P. (2004). The trial intensive management area for crocodiles: a
crocodile removal zone in Queensland, Australia. Coastal Management
32, 319330. doi:10.1080/08920750490448424
Kofron, C. P., and Smith, R. (2001). Status of estuarine crocodiles in the
populated coast of north-east Queensland. Memoirs of the Queensland
Museum 46, 603610.
Lang, J. W. (1987). Crocodilian behaviour: implications for management. In
Wildlife Management: Crocodiles and Alligators. (Eds G. J. W. Webb,
S. C. Manolis and P. J. Whitehead.) pp. 273294. (Surrey Beatty and
Sons: Sydney.)
Letnic, M., and Connors, G. (2006). Changes in the distribution and
abundance of saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus) in the
upstream, freshwater reaches of rivers in the Northern Territory,
Australia. Wildlife Research 33, 529538. doi:10.1071/WR05090
Lewis, J. L., FitzSimmons, N. N., Jamerlan, M. L., Buchan, J. C., and Grigg,
G. C. (2013). Mating systems and multiple paternity in the estuarine
crocodile (Crocodylus porosus). Journal of Herpetology 47,2433.
doi:10.1670/10-303
Manolis, S. C., and Webb, G. J. (2014). Humancrocodile conict in the
Australia and Oceania region. In Proceedings of the 23rd Working
Meeting of the Crocodile Specialist Group, Louisiana, USA, 2630
May 2014. pp. 200208. (IUCN The World Conservation Union:
Gland, Switzerland.)
Messel, H., Vorlicek, G. C., Wells, A. G., and Green, W. J. (1981). Surveys
of tidal river systems in the Northern Territory of Australia and their
crocodile populations. Monograph 1. (Pergamon Press: Sydney.)
Miller, J. D., and Bell, I. P. (1997). Crocodiles in the Great Barrier Reef
World Heritage area. In State of the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage
Area. Workshop Series 23. pp. 248255. (Queensland Department of
Environment, Townsville, Queensland, Australia).
Pooley, S. (2014). An historical overview of human crocodile conict in
South Africa and Swaziland, 19492014. In Proceedings of the 23rd
Working Meeting of the Crocodile Specialist Group, Louisiana, USA,
2630 May 2014. pp. 236245. (IUCN The World Conservation
Union: Gland, Switzerland.)
Read, M. A., Miller, J. D., Bell, I. P., and Felton, A. (2004). The distribution
and abundance of the estuarine crocodile, Crocodylus porosus,in
Queensland. Wildlife Research 31, 527534. doi:10.1071/WR02025
Read, M. A., Grigg, G. C., Irwin, S. R., Shanahan, D., and Franklin, C. E.
(2007). Satellite tracking reveals long distance coastal travel and
homing by translocated estuarine crocodiles, Crocodylus porosus.
PLoS One 2, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000949
Royal Life Saving Society Australia (2014). Royal Life Saving National
Drowning Report. Available at http://www.mq.edu.au/__data/assets/
pdf_le/0014/120074/RLS-National-Drowning-Report-2015.pdf [accessed
12 September 2016].
Taplin, L. E. (1987). The management of crocodiles in Queensland,
Australia. In Wildlife Management: Crocodiles and Alligators. (Eds
G. J. W. Webb, S. C. Manolis and P. J. Whitehead.) pp. 129140. (Surrey
Beatty and Sons: Sydney.)
Tucker, A. D., McCallum, H. I., Limpus, C. J., and McDonald, K. R. (1998).
Sex-biased dispersal in a long-lived polygynous reptile (Crocodylus
johnstoni). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 44,8590. doi:10.1007/
s002650050519
Walsh, B., and Whitehead, P. J. (1993). Problem crocodiles, Crocodylus
porosus, at Nhulunbuy, Northern Territory: an assessment of relocation
as a management strategy. Wildlife Research 20, 127135. doi:10.1071/
WR9930127
Webb, G., and Manolis, S. C. (1989). Crocodiles of Australia.(Reed Books:
Sydney.)
Webb, G. J. W., Messel, H., and Magnusson, W. E. (1977). The nesting
biology of Crocodylus porosus in Arnhem Land, northern Australia.
Copeia 1977, 238249. doi:10.2307/1443905
Webb, G. J., Manolis, S. C., and Brien, M. L. (2010). Saltwater crocodile,
Crocodylus porosus.InStatus Survey and Conservation Action Plan,
3rd edn. pp. 99113. (Eds S. C. Manolis and C. Stevenson.) (Crocodile
Specialist Group: Darwin.)
West, J. G. (2011). Changing patterns of shark attacks in Australian waters.
Marine and Freshwater Research 62, 744754. doi:10.1071/MF10181
Woodward, A. R., Leone, E. H., Dutton, H. J., Hord, L., and Waller,
J. E. (2014). Human alligator conict in Florida. In Proceedings of the
23rd Working Meeting of the Crocodile Specialist Group, Louisiana,
USA, 2630 May 2014. pp. 182199. (IUCN The World Conservation
Union: Gland, Switzerland.)
290 Wildlife Research M. L. Brien et al.
www.publish.csiro.au/journals/wr
... También se expresan causas asociadas a algunas cualidades del reptil o del hábitat, entre ellas se mencionó que los humanos forman parte de la dieta, que hacían falta presas para el saurio, que las poblaciones del reptil había aumentado, existían más cocodrilos viejos y grandes, lo cual genera que el ataque sea de mayor importancia, aspectos también mencionados en otras investigaciones que analizan asimismo el conflicto humano cocodrilo (Amarasinghe et al., 2015;Caldicott et al., 2005). También la época de reproducción fue señalada como un momento peligroso, debido a la protección del nido y de las crías, que genera mayor agresividad de reptil debido a la territorialidad (Brien et al., 2017;Caldicott et al., 2005), aspectos desconocidos por los pobladores. No obstante, un artículo reporta que durante esta época, una proporción de la población (correspondiente a las hembras reproductivas) no se alimentan activamente, por lo cual no atacan a los humanos (Aust et al., 2009), siendo esta época un momento donde los ataques causados por la dieta del reptil disminuirían, pero no así aquellos asociados directamente a los aspectos de su reproducción. ...
... Respecto al ambiente, se mencionó que hay factores temporales como la temperatura que pueden influir en el aumento de accidentes, pues los incidentes incrementan con los meses cálidos. También se indicó el nivel de agua, que es dependiente del patrón de lluvias, pues cuando el nivel baja las actividades humanas se concentran en los cuerpos de agua, aumentando el riesgo, esto es similar a lo reportado en algunos sitios donde en los meses cálidos aumenta la presencia de turistas en los cuerpos de agua (Brien et al., 2017;Caldicott et al., 2005). Estos aspectos de tipo ecológico, se sabe que afectan en las características de los conflictos e influyen en su intensidad (Dickman, 2010;Lamarque et al., 2009), analizarlos ha permitido conocer una parte del fenómeno accidente humano-cocodrilo, pero no son suficientes para comprender motivaciones o acciones de las personas involucradas (Peterson et al., 2010). ...
Article
Full-text available
El resultado de la interacción entre humanos y fauna produce escenarios donde la conservación y el desarrollo local sustentable se comprometen. Aunque es un tema relevante por sus implicaciones, no existen estudios que hayan sistematizado el conocimiento generado con respecto a las especies involucradas y las características del conflicto. Esta investigación, a través de una revisión sistemática de bases de datos y un análisis narrativo de contenido, identifica y analiza el conflicto humano-cocodrilo a nivel mundial en 28 artículos, con base en el origen y tendencia de las investigaciones, especies involucradas y tipo de interacción. La relación conflictiva es explicada a través de aspecto biológicos como la reproducción o dieta del saurio, así como de su crecimiento poblacional o demográfico, pero también de factores ambientales como el nivel de agua o temperatura, se identificaron las repercusiones económicas y para la conservación de las especies asociadas a este conflicto. Dominan los estudios centrados en ataques a humanos, en el continente americano y para la especie Crocodylus acutus. Los efectos del cocodrilo fueron directos (ataque a humanos) e indirectos (daños a la pesca, agricultura, ganadería, mascotas). El conflicto de intereses entre grupos sociales, así como los aspectos ligados a cultura, percepción, religión u otras cualidades sociales, fueron poco abordados por los artículos analizados.
... It is noteworthy that this incident coincided with the reproductive season of the species (April to September), during which the greatest number of interactions are observed. This finding concurs with national and worldwide statistics (Brien et al. 2017;García-Grajales and Buenrostro-Silva 2018;Khan et al. 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Human-crocodile interaction in the Laguna del Carpintero, Tampico, Tamaulipas, Mexico has been a growing concern for the last several years, with homeless people being the most affected, although individuals of fixed address have also been involved. The objective of this document is to describe in detail a case of non-fatal human-crocodile interaction in this lagoon and the response of the SOS Crocodile Tampico working group. To document the case, we collected information on the interaction, the causative crocodile and the affected person. On June 8, 2024 a male person was involved in a non-fatal interaction with a 278 cm long crocodile, which caused a fracture in his left leg, requiring him to be transported to the nearest hospital. This event activated the first response team who provided pre-hospital and hospital care; search and capture of the crocodile involved, as well as the custody, handling and final disposal of the crocodile into captivity. Therefore, we consider that inter-institutional coordination between federal, state, municipal, health and crocodile specialists, integrated as the SOS Crocodile working group, is fundamental to rapidly and efficiently attend the interactions with crocodiles in urban areas.
... It is noteworthy that this incident coincided with the reproductive season of the species (April to September), during which the greatest number of interactions are observed. This finding concurs with national and worldwide statistics (Brien et al. 2017;García-Grajales and Buenrostro-Silva 2018;Khan et al. 2020). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Human-crocodile interaction in the Laguna del Carpintero, Tampico, Tamaulipas, Mexico has been a growing concern for the last several years, with homeless people being the most affected in recent years, however, productive people have also been involved. The objective of this document is to describe in detail a case of non-fatal human-crocodile interaction in this lagoon and the response of the SOS Crocodile Tampico working group. To document the case, we collected information on the interaction, the causative crocodile and the affected person. On June 8, 2024 a male person was involved in a non-fatal interaction with a 278 cm long crocodile, which caused a fracture in his left leg, requiring him to be transported to the nearest hospital. This event activated the first response team who provided pre-hospital and hospital care; search and capture of the crocodile involved, as well as the custody, handling and final disposal of the crocodile into captivity. Therefore, we consider that inter-institutional coordination between federal, state, municipal, health and crocodile specialists, integrated as the SOS Crocodile working group, is fundamental to rapidly and efficiently attend the interactions with crocodiles in urban areas.
... In 1984, nests were located by tramping on foot over ~200 km 2 of seasonally flooded woodland and swamps (Archibald & Swengel 1987). This was possible because Queensland populations of Estuarine Crocodiles Crocodylus porosus had been greatly reduced by intensive hunting after World War II and until 1974, when protection was enacted, after which recovery of the species was initially slow (Brien et al. 2017). Since the survey of 1984, crocodile numbers have increased greatly, rendering surveys on foot in the wet season too dangerous (GWA & TDN pers. ...
Article
Full-text available
Nesting ecology of the Australian Sarus Crane Grus antigone gillae is the least well known of the four global Sarus Crane populations. All confirmed breeding sites are in Queensland, concentrated on seasonally flooded wetlands in the Gulf Plains bioregion, where the Australian Sarus Crane is sympatric with the Brolga G. rubicunda. This article describes a trial helicopter survey of crane nesting in February 2017, carried out under the auspices of the International Crane Foundation and with the participation of the Normanton Land and Sea Rangers. We report the first record of a three-egg clutch for the Australian Sarus Crane. All Australian Sarus Crane nests were found in habitats with trees, whereas only Brolgas were found nesting in treeless tussock grassland and in saline habitats. Since the last nest survey in 1984, numbers of Estuarine Crocodiles Crocodylus porosus have grown to the point where foot surveys are no longer safe, and this study shows that helicopters could provide a useful alternative method for further surveys of crane nests in the Gulf Plains bioregion.
... Moreover, conflict incidents usually reach a peak during the breeding season, as crocodiles are 'hole-nesters', having on-shore dens with extensive guarding, and parents actively defend the nests and the hatchlings (Henkanaththegedara et al., 2023). Globally, such conflict situation between humans and crocodiles is quite common (Wallace et al., 2011;Fukuda et al., 2014;Brien et al., 2017;Brackhane et al., 2018;Das and Jana, 2018;Uluwaduge et al., 2018;García-Grajales and Buenrostro-Silva, 2019;Khan et al., 2020). However, a contrasting situation exists in a few crocodile habitats, where local people peacefully coexist with significant populations of large reptiles (Van Der Ploeg et al., 2011). ...
Article
Full-text available
Animals face several challenges in their natural environment, and to cope with such conditions, they may exhibit contrasting physiological responses that directly affect their overall well-being and survival. In this study, we assessed physiological responses via faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (fGCM) measurements in free-ranging mugger crocodiles inhabiting diverse habitats in Gujarat, India. We sampled muggers within Charotar, a rural area (Zone A) with local people having high tolerance towards the presence of muggers, and Vadodara, a region having both urban (Zone B) and rural (Zone C) areas with high levels of human–mugger conflict (HMC). Further, muggers in Vadodara live in water bodies that are mostly polluted due to sewage disposal from adjoining chemical industries. To measure fGCM (mean ± SEM, ng/g dry faeces) levels in muggers, scats were collected during both breeding (N = 107 scats) and non-breeding (N = 22 scats) seasons from all three zones. We used captive muggers (a focal enclosure) to biologically validate (via capture and restraint) the selected fGCM assay (11-oxoetiocholanolone assay). We showed a significant (P < 0.05) 11-fold increase in fGCM levels between pre-capture (540.9 ± 149.2, N = 11) and post-capture (6259.7 ± 1150.5, N = 11) samples. The validated assay was applied to free-ranging muggers during the breeding season, and Zone A showed significantly (P < 0.05) lower fGCM levels (542.03 ± 71.3) compared to muggers of Zone B (1699.9 ± 180.8) and Zone C (1806.4 ± 243.2), both zones having high levels of HMC with polluted water bodies. A similar contrast in fGCM levels was also observed during the non-breeding season. Overall, the study demonstrated that fGCM levels in muggers varied across habitats, and such variation could be due to a multitude of ecological factors that the species experience in their immediate local environment. Moreover, high fGCM levels in muggers of Vadodara during both breeding and non-breeding seasons may indicate a condition of chronic stress, which could be maladaptive for the species.
... Когда молодые самцы становятся крупнее, они вынуждены мигрировать, часто вниз по течению к океану, где они двигаются вдоль береговой линии в поисках рек, в которых они могли бы создать свои собственные территории, или вверх по течению в более свежие, мелкие водотоки. Это может привести к тому, что крупные крокодилы оказываются в водотоках (включая лагуны, пляжи, острова и верховья рек), где их не ждут (Brien et al., 2017). Когда крупных "крокодилов-боссов" отстреливают, как иногда проопогандируют люди, обеспокоенные опасностью, исходящей от таких крупных животных, это приводит к притоку других самцов, что может привести к более опасной ситуации. ...
Book
Full-text available
As human-wildlife conflicts become more frequent, serious and widespread worldwide, they are notoriously challenging to resolve, and many efforts to address these conflicts struggle to make progress. These Guidelines provide an essential guide to understanding and resolving human-wildlife conflict. The Guidelines aim to provide foundations and principles for good practice, with clear, practical guidance on how best to tackle conflicts and enable coexistence with wildlife. They have been developed for use by conservation practitioners, community leaders, decision-makers, researchers, government officers and others. Focusing on approaches and tools for analysis and decision-making, they are not limited to any particular species or region of the world.
... They may well be dispersing from core habitats in search of new resources or territories (Campbell et al. 2013;Baker et al. 2019Baker et al. , 2022Fukuda et al. 2022b). This contrasts situations in QLD where densities are much lower than the NT (Read et al. 2004, Brien et al. 2017, Taplin et al. 2020 With regard to public safety, crocodiles over 3 m long arriving in Darwin Harbor represent an immediate threat to swimmers (Fukuda et al. 2014, and their interception is a management priority. Smaller crocodiles, if not removed, may become established in the various tributaries feeding into Darwin Harbor, some of which are popular swimming sites (e.g., Berry Springs and Howard Springs). ...
Article
Full-text available
Management programs that successfully recovered wild saltwater crocodile ( Crocodylus porosus ) populations in the Northern Territory of Australia did so with an expanding commitment to maintaining public safety. One aspect of the program is the ongoing removal of resident and immigrant crocodiles within Darwin Harbor (since 1979), the main urban center. We determined the likely sources of crocodiles caught as problem animals between 2015–2017 by comparing recently developed methods for population assignment. Depending on the assignment model used, we estimated that between 30% and 50% of crocodiles in Darwin Harbor originated from the Adelaide and Mary rivers, and the Kakadu region east of Darwin, and between 20% and 30% of crocodiles originated from the Finniss, Reynolds, and Daly rivers southwest of Darwin. Saltwater crocodiles occur at particularly high densities in these catchments. The remainder came from a mixture of different sources across the Northern Territory. The most common animals captured were immature (150–180 cm) males that have traveled 100–200 km. We did not identify any relationships between the distance from the inferred origin to Darwin Harbor and the size and sex of the crocodiles, or the year of capture. The targeted removal of crocodiles from specific sites such as Darwin Harbor, near where most people live, improves public safety in the highest risk areas, without compromising abundant source populations in most areas.
... As younger males get bigger, they are forced to migrate, often downstream to the ocean, where they move along the coastline looking for rivers in which to establish their own territories, or upstream into fresher, smaller waterways. This can result in large crocodiles turning up in waterways (including lagoons, beaches, islands and headwaters of rivers) where they are not expected (Brien et al., 2017). When the large 'boss crocs' are shot, as is sometimes advocated by people worried about the danger posed by such large animals, this results in an influx of other males, and can result in a more dangerous situation. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Impact evaluations assess the causal link between an action (e.g. erecting a fence) and the outcomes (e.g. a change in the rate of crop raiding by elephants). This goes beyond understanding whether a project has been implemented (e.g. whether activities were completed) to understanding what changes happened due to the actions taken and why they happened as they did. Impact evaluation is thus defined as the systematic process of assessing the effects of an intervention (e.g. project or policy) by comparing what actually happened with what would have happened without it (i.e. the counterfactual)
... As younger males get bigger, they are forced to migrate, often downstream to the ocean, where they move along the coastline looking for rivers in which to establish their own territories, or upstream into fresher, smaller waterways. This can result in large crocodiles turning up in waterways (including lagoons, beaches, islands and headwaters of rivers) where they are not expected (Brien et al., 2017). When the large 'boss crocs' are shot, as is sometimes advocated by people worried about the danger posed by such large animals, this results in an influx of other males, and can result in a more dangerous situation. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Historically, conservationists have focused on financial and technical solutions to human-wildlife conflicts (Redpath et al., 2013). It has become clear that although these are important to generate a context where change is possible, more attention to human behaviour is needed to achieve longer-term human-wildlife coexistence (Veríssimo & Campbell, 2015). Interventions targeting human behaviour have been largely focused on measures such as regulation and education. Regulation in this context refers to the system of rules made by a government or other authority, usually backed by penalties and enforcement mechanisms, which describes the way people should behave, while education is concerned with the provision of information about a topic. However, the degree of influence of these interventions depends on the priority audience being motivated (i.e. the individual believes change is in their best interest) and/or able to change (i.e. overcome social pressure, inertia and social norms) (Figure 21) (Smith et al., 2020b).
Article
Full-text available
Simple Summary Congenital defects have been described in almost every vertebrate group. In crocodiles, teratology alterations have been described in captive animals (pets, zoos, farms) such as Crocodylus niloticus and Gavialis gangeticus. The present study aimed to characterize congenital malformations of C. acutus from a farm in Lomas de Matunilla, Ballestas, Bolívar, Colombia. The analyzed eggs presented macroscopic malformations, with 42 different types of anomalies observed. Limb and tail malformations (29%) were the most common changes observed. Abstract The American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus, Cuvier, 1807) (Class Reptilia, Family Crocodylidae) is a crocodile species inhabiting the Neotropics. Congenital defects have been described in almost every vertebrate group. In crocodiles, teratology alterations have been described in captive animals (pets, zoos, farms) such as Crocodylus niloticus or Gavialis gangeticus. The present study aimed to characterize congenital malformations of C. acutus from a farm in Lomas de Matunilla, Ballestas, Bolívar, Colombia. A total of 550 unhatched eggs were examined after embryo death. A total of 61 embryos presented malformations, with 42 different types of anomalies observed. Limb and tail malformations (29%) were the most common malformations observed. Several malformations, such as cephalothoracopagus, thoracopagus, sternopagus, xiphopagus twins, campylorrachis scoliosa, and acrania, were documented in crocodiles for the first time. Research in teratology enhances our understanding of crocodile biology. It plays a role in their conservation and management, thus helping to ensure the long-term viability of these species in their natural habitats.
Article
Full-text available
Saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) populations have recovered strongly across northern Australia over the 30 years since the species was protected from hunting. However, monitoring studies show large geographical variations in abundance across the Northern Territory, Queensland and Western Australia. The Northern Territory has considerably higher densities, raising questions about constraints on recovery in the other states. We examined broad-scale environmental influences on population abundance by modelling the species–environment relationships across northern Australia. The hypothesis-based models showed strong support for the linkage to (1) the ratio of total area of favourable wetland vegetation types (Melaleuca, grass and sedge) to total catchment area, (2) a measure of rainfall seasonality, namely the ratio of total precipitation in the coldest quarter to total precipitation in the warmest quarter of a year, and (3) the mean temperature in the coldest quarter of a year. On the other hand, we were unable to show any clear negative association with landscape modification, as indicated by the extent of high-impact land uses or human population density in catchments. We conclude that geographical variations in crocodile density are mostly attributable to differences in habitat quality rather than the management regimes adopted in the respective jurisdictions.
Article
Full-text available
Although infrequent, shark attacks attract a high level of public and media interest, and often have serious consequences for those attacked. Data from the Australian Shark Attack File were examined to determine trends in unprovoked shark attacks since 1900, particularly over the past two decades. The way people use the ocean has changed over time. The rise in Australian shark attacks, from an average of 6.5 incidents per year in 1990–2000, to 15 incidents per year over the past decade, coincides with an increasing human population, more people visiting beaches, a rise in the popularity of water-based fitness and recreational activities and people accessing previously isolated coastal areas. There is no evidence of increasing shark numbers that would influence the rise of attacks in Australian waters. The risk of a fatality from shark attack in Australia remains low, with an average of 1.1 fatalities year–1 over the past 20 years. The increase in shark attacks over the past two decades is consistent with international statistics of shark attacks increasing annually because of the greater numbers of people in the water.
Data
Full-text available
In northern Australia Crocodylus porosus nest between November and March, i.e. during the wet season. Mean distance between nests and permanent water was 7.8 m. Nests adjacent to more saline, lower reaches of rivers were in freshwater swamps, whereas further upstream they were beside the river. The nests are mounds, with mean dimensions: 53 cm high, 175 cm long and 157 cm wide, constructed of vegetation and mud, collected from a mean area of 47 m2. Beside the nest may be 1 to 4 wallows. Some nests are made in which no eggs are deposited. Mean number of eggs per nest was 50 (range 40 to 62). Variation in egg size between nests was far greater than that within any one nest. Mean egg length varied from 7.2 cm to 8.1 cm, egg width from 4.7 cm to 5.4 cm and egg weight from 91 gm to 132 gm. Flooding killed all embryos in 24 of 30 nests with eggs under study. Incubation temperature means ranged between 27.3 C and 31.4 C. Temperatures within a nest can be stable or fluctuate ± 3 C. Maximum temperatures may occur during the night. Incubation time was between 80 and 98 days. Predation on eggs was minimal. Survival rate of juveniles was high. Adult C. porosus, thought to be the females, remain next to the nest during incubation, excavate the nest when the young hatch, and remain with the hatchling group for up to 2½ months after hatching.
Article
Full-text available
We reviewed the historical records of attacks by saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus) and the removal of problem saltwater crocodiles in the Northern Territory of Australia. Between 1977 and 2013, 5,792 problem crocodiles were removed, of which 69.04% were males and 83.01% were caught within the Darwin Crocodile Management Zone where suitable breeding habitats were hardly available. The most common size class was 150–200 cm and their mean size did not change significantly over years. This reflected the greater mobility of juvenile males as the majority of problem crocodiles, dispersing from core habitats that were occupied by dominant individuals. Eighteen fatal attacks and 45 non-fatal attacks occurred between 1971 and 2013. The rate of crocodile attacks, particularly non-fatal cases, increased over time. This increase was strongly related to the increasing populations of both humans and crocodiles, and the increasing proportion of larger (>180 cm) crocodiles. The management of human-crocodile conflict (HCC) should incorporate both human (e.g., public education and safety awareness) and crocodile (e.g., population monitoring, removal of problem crocodiles) components. Crocodiles in the 300–350-cm class were most responsible for attacks, and they should be strategically targeted as the most likely perpetrator. Approximately 60% of attacks occurred around population centers including remote communities. Problem crocodile capture and attacks both peak in the beginning (Sep–Dec) and end (Mar–Apr) of the wet season. However, fatal attacks occurred almost all year around. Attacks by crocodiles >400 cm often resulted in death of the victim (73.33%). Local and male victims were much more common than visitors and females, respectively. The most common activity of victims was swimming and wading. Despite the increasing rate of attacks over time, the Northern Territory's management program, and in particular the removal of problem crocodiles from urban areas, is considered to have reduced potential HCC. Public education about crocodile awareness and risks must be maintained. © 2014 The Wildlife Society.
Article
Full-text available
We examined agonistic behaviour in seven species of hatchling and juvenile crocodilians held in small groups (N = 4) under similar laboratory conditions. Agonistic interactions occurred in all seven species, typically involved two individuals, were short in duration (5-15 seconds), and occurred between 1600-2200 h in open water. The nature and extent of agonistic interactions, the behaviours displayed, and the level of conspecific tolerance varied among species. Discrete postures, non-contact and contact movements are described. Three of these were species-specific: push downs by C. johnstoni; inflated tail sweeping by C. novaeguineae; and, side head striking combined with tail wagging by C. porosus. The two long-snouted species (C. johnstoni and G. gangeticus) avoided contact involving the head and often raised the head up out of the way during agonistic interactions. Several behaviours not associated with aggression are also described, including snout rubbing, raising the head up high while at rest, and the use of vocalizations. The two most aggressive species (C. porosus, C. novaeguineae) appeared to form dominance hierarchies, whereas the less aggressive species did not. Interspecific differences in agonistic behaviour may reflect evolutionary divergence associated with morphology, ecology, general life history and responses to interspecific conflict in areas where multiple species have co-existed. Understanding species-specific traits in agonistic behaviour and social tolerance has implications for the controlled raising of different species of hatchlings for conservation, management or production purposes.
Article
Full-text available
We examined agonistic behaviour in hatchling Australian freshwater crocodiles (Crocodylus johnstoni) at 2 weeks, 13 weeks, and 50 weeks after hatching, and between C. johnstoni and saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus) at 40–50 weeks of age. Among C. johnstoni, agonistic interactions (15–23 s duration) were well established by two weeks old and typically involved two and occasionally three individuals, mostly between 17 : 00 and 24 : 00 hours in open-water areas of enclosures. A range of discrete postures, non-contact and contact movements are described. The head is rarely targeted in contact movements with C. johnstoni because they exhibit a unique ‘head raised high’ posture, and engage in ‘push downs’. In contrast with C. porosus of a similar age, agonistic interactions between C. johnstoni were conducted with relatively low intensity and showed limited ontogenetic change; there was also no evidence of a dominance hierarchy among hatchlings by 50 weeks of age, when the frequency of agonistic interactions was lowest. Agonistic interactions between C. johnstoni and C. porosus at 40–50 weeks of age were mostly low level, with no real exclusion or dominance observed. However, smaller individuals of both species moved slowly out of the way when a larger individual of either species approached. When medium- or high-level interspecific interactions did occur, it was between similar-sized individuals, and each displayed species-specific behaviours that appeared difficult for contestants to interpret: there was no clear winner or loser. The nature of agonistic interactions between the two species suggests that dominance may be governed more strongly by size rather than by species-specific aggressiveness.
Article
Tully to Cooktown encompasses 325km of coastline in northeast Queensland. During the past 50 years this area has undergone tremendous urban, rural residential and agricultural development. North of Cooktown human population density is low. Since 1990, Estuarine Crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus) have attacked six people in Queensland resulting in one death and five serious injuries. Two attacks occurred in the study area in Cairns during 1997 and 1998. Consequently public perception is that numbers of crocodiles have increased greatly since cessation of commercial hunting in 1974 and elimination of removal zones around cities and towns in 1991, and public concern for human safety from crocodile attack is high. We surveyed the major waterways between Tully and Cooktown for Estuarine Crocodiles from June 1996 to May 1998: Hull R, Maria Ck, Moresby R, Johnstone R, Russell/Mulgrave R, Trinity Inlet, Barron R, Daintree R, Annan R. and Endeavour R. These waterways comprise most of the habitat occupied by Estuarine Crocodiles between Tully and Cooktown. We surveyed 346km of waterway, sighting 146 crocodiles at densities 0.11/km to 1.00/km. Overall density was 0.34/km, which relative to most waterways in Cape York Peninsula is low. Contrary to public perception, the crocodile population between Tully and Cooktown is of low density. Certain human activities such as urban, rural residential and agricultural development, clearing of riparian vegetation, disturbance by motor boats, commercial gill netting in estuaries, and removal of crocodiles appear to be keeping crocodile numbers low in this area. Crocodiles, north Queensland, estuarine.
Article
Microsatellite markers were used to investigate the mating system of the Estuarine Crocodile (Crocodylus porosus). Three-hundred and eighty-six hatchlings from 13 clutches from a wild Northern Territory population, and 364 hatchlings from 21 clutches from a captive North Queensland population, were sampled. All samples were genotyped across five microsatellite loci. Multiple paternity was found in 69% of clutches in the wild population compared to 38% of clutches in the captive population. Up to three possible fathers were indicated in some clutches. Shared paternity was suggested by the presence of a common paternal genotype within two clutches in the wild population and among up to three clutches from a large shared pen in the captive population. The probability of detecting multiple paternity at all loci was high; 95% in the wild population and 98% in the captive population. There was no evidence of increased hatching success in the clutches that indicated multiple paternity compared to single paternity clutches in either population (P = 0.43 to P = 0.67). It is unknown whether the occurrence of multiple paternity in C. porosus is a result of multiple mating within the same breeding season or of sperm stored from matings in a previous season. These results suggest the genetic mating system for C. porosus is not polygynous but more likely promiscuous, and there is no evidence of dominant alpha males who control paternity in large areas.
Article
This book provides an update on the population dynamics of Crocodylus porous in the tidal waterways of Van Diemen Gulf and the Southern Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia, during 1984 and 1985. Contents: Prologue; Dedication; Introduction; Status of Crocodylus porous. July 1984, in the tidal waterways of the Alligator Region and in the Adelaide River System of Northern Australia: recovery underway; Resurvey of Crocodylus porous populations in the tidal waterways of the southern Gulf of Carpentaria, September - October 1985; Local knowledge - Northern Australia style.