ArticlePDF Available

The effect of free cash flow on the companies' financial polices: Evidence from Jordan

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

This study aims to examine the effect of the free cash flows (FCF) on the financial polices (the financial leverage and the dividends) of the Jordanian industrial companies which are listed in Amman Stock Exchange (ASE), which are 58 companies. The study is performed by surveying the financial reports of these companies which are disclosed inASE. The study uses regression to analysis the data and to examine the study's hypotheses. The study reveals that there is a significant negative effect of FCF on financial leverage, while there is insignificant effect of FCF on dividends. The study recommends the accounting professional members to agree on one definition of FCF to help researches and to make the comparison between companies easy, the companies to disclose in their reports as the requirements of IFRS 1, and to ask these companies to disclose FCF in their financial reports.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1International Journal of Economic Research
The effect of Free Cash Flow on the Companies’ Financial Polices: Evidence from Jordan
International Journal of Economic Research
ISSN : 0972-9380
available at http: www.serialsjournal.com
© Serials Publications Pvt. Ltd.
Volume 14 Number 9 2017
The effect of Free Cash Flow on the Companies’ Financial Polices:
Evidence from Jordan
Musa Abdel Latif Ibrahim Alnawaiseh, Rania Mohammad Alomari,
Firas Al-Rawashdeh and Mahmoud barakat alnawaiseh
Faculty of Management and Finance, The University of Jordan, E-mail: nawayseh@ju.edu.jo
Abstract:
This study aims to examine the effect of the free cash flows (FCF) on the financial polices (the
financial leverage and the dividends) of the Jordanian industrial companies which are listed in Amman Stock
Exchange (ASE), which are 58 companies. The study is performed by surveying the financial reports of these
companies which are disclosed inASE. The study uses regression to analysis the data and to examine the
study’s hypotheses.
The study reveals that there is a significant negative effect of FCF on financial leverage, while there is insignificant
effect of FCF on dividends.
The study recommends the accounting professional members to agree on one definition of FCF to
help researches and to make the comparison between companies easy, the companies to disclose in their
reports as the requirements of IFRS 1, and to ask these companies to disclose FCF in their financial
reports.
Key words:
free cash flow, leverage, dividend.
INTRODUCTION
Free cash flow is used to pay dividends, to repay debt and interest payable to creditors or lenders, to
repurchase the company’s shares, to purchase new investments and to purchase new assets. Some time the
increase of these flows may not be in benefit of the company, especially when managers fail to use these
flows to increase the owners’ wealth, after that the conflict between the owners’ interests and managers’
interests may be appeared, and the agency problems appear and .
Because of the importance of free cash flow analysis, many countries start to ask companies to do
this analysis and enclose it in their financial reports, such as in the United States.
International Journal of Economic Research 2
Musa Abdel Latif Ibrahim Alnawaiseh, Rania Mohammad Alomari, Firas Al-Rawashdeh & Mahmoud barakat alnawaiseh
The studies that investigated the relationship between FCF and the financial indicators increased in
developed countries, but such studies came late in undeveloped countries that need these kinds of studies.
The management of the company which has allegiance to its enterprise trays to enhance the company’s
position, chooses the productive investments, increases the owner’s equity, pays the company’s debts without
liquidating assets, pays declared dividends, if it has FCF. So it should analysis the relationships between
FCF and the financial ratios, because it gives an integrated picture of the company, helps in evaluating the
company’s performance accurately.
This study examined the effect on free cash flow on the financial leverage and dividend payout in the
Jordanian industrial companies which is listed on Amman Financial Market, based on the data available for
these companies in this market.
THE STUDY PROBLEM
A lot of industrial companies in Jordan are profitable units, this is followed by emergence of surplus cash
flows, but a few of them announced a dividend regularly, this will effect on numbers of the investors, who
like to invest in them, hence, this study try to answer the following questions:
Question 1: Is there a statistically significant effect of the free cash flows on the financial leverage of
the Jordanian industrial companies listed in the ASM?
Question 2: Is there a statistically significant effect of free cash flows on the dividend of the Jordanian
industrial companies listed on the ASM?
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY AND ITS OBJECTIVES
The study aims to track the impact of free cash flow on the financial leverage and the dividends payout,
as a first study in this field in Jordan. The study aims to answer questions the study and testing of
hypotheses.
THE STUDY HYPOTHESES
The study aims to test following hypotheses:
H01: There is no statistically significant of free cash flows on the financial leverage in the Jordanian
industrial companies listed in ASM.
H02: There is no statistically significant of free cash flows on the dividends payout of the Jordanian
industrial companies listed in ASM.
THE STUDY LIMITATIONS
After surveying the previous studies in the study’s field and collecting the study’s data, researcher faced the
following limitations:
The number of industrial companies is not enough to help researcher to achieve better result
The difficulty of obtaining the financial data directly from the companies.
3International Journal of Economic Research
The effect of Free Cash Flow on the Companies’ Financial Polices: Evidence from Jordan
LITERATURE REVIEW
There are a lot of FCF definitions. Utami and Inanga (2011) defines FCF as it is the net income minus
changes in fixed and changes of assets in net working capital divided by total assets. Wu (2004) defines it as
the operating income before depreciation minus interest, tax and preferred shares dividends divided by the
book value of assets. Chu (2011) defines FCF as an operating income before depreciation minus income
tax expense, interest expense and expenses of investment. Wang (2010) defines FCF as the flows from
operating activities minus income tax, interest and dividend of preferred shares divided by the net sales. J
Khan et al. (2012) define FCF as an operating income before depreciation divided by total assets.
FCF can be used to pay debts (Griffin et al., 2010, Fleming et al. 2005), or to pay declared dividends
(Mollah et al., 2000, DeAngelo et al., 2004, and Amidu and Abor 2006 ), these dividends become payable
after the announcement date (Oded 2009). Sometimes managers do not tend to pay dividends whether is
a lot of free cash flow (Chen et al., 2011) because they tend to invest these flows in un productive projects
(Abor and Bokin 2010), or in unacceptable projects by the owners (Cardoso, et al., 2014,). But if these
flows are used to purchase shares of multinational companies, the control of foreign shareholders and
agencies make the control on FCF more effective, this will achieve control on the managers’ behavior and
ensure that their actions are acceptable by the owners (Coffee 2002, Cheng et al., 2014, Zhou et al., 2011).
This action will increase the possibility of the use of FCF in productive investment opportunities (Richardson
2006). The company can use FCF in purchasing its shares back (Kapavicius and Yu 2012), and therefore
the FCF analysis and the study of its impact on a lot of variables become important issues (Rezaei andJafar
2015), and if it easy to FCF predict, this will help in making investment decisions which are more optimistic.
The financial leverage represents the company’s use of debt to increase the return on equity as a
substitute of increasing the capital, (Friedlob, G.T. and Schleifor, L. F. 2003).
Company may distribute part of its profits to shareholders as dividends in cash or in the form of
shares, cash dividends, investors and shareholders usually interest with declaring dividend by the company.
Company should take in to account the availability of retained earnings and cash to pay the when it
decided to distribute dividends. But if the company take a decision to distribute dividends from the additional
capital, the dividends in this case is called liquidation dividend (Weygant et al., 2012.
There are many studies investigate the effect of FCF onfinancial leverage and dividends payout such
as the study ofTijjanii and Sani (2015) who examined the impact of FCF on dividend policy in the oil and
gas Nigerian companies depending on the annual reports of the samples that have been studied during the
period (2003- 2014), and they found that there is a positive impact of FCF on dividends policy .Rezaei s
and Jafari (2015) examined the relationship between financial leverage and the following variables: FCF,
investments, profitability, the percentage of Tobin’s Q, liquidity ratio, tangible assets and cash dividends,
depending on the financial data of 91 company listed in the Iranian capital market during the period (
2009- 2013), and they found that there is a statistically significant negative relationship between FCF and
the other variables.Sindhu (2014) examined the impact of FCF on dividend payout, depending on the
financial data of 30 Spinning company listed in Pakistan’s financial market during the period (2000 – 2009),
and he found that there is a non statistically significant effect of FCF on dividends payout. Chenge et al.,
(2014) examined the impact of FCF on the growth opportunities and dividend payout, depending on the
financial statements of 1105 Chinese companies during the period (2003-2011), and they found that the is
International Journal of Economic Research 4
Musa Abdel Latif Ibrahim Alnawaiseh, Rania Mohammad Alomari, Firas Al-Rawashdeh & Mahmoud barakat alnawaiseh
a positive statistically significant effect of FCF on dividends payout.Parsian and Koloukhi (2013) examined
the impact of FCF and profitability on dividend payout, depending on financial data of 102 Iranian’s
companies during the period (2005- 2010), and they found that there isa statistically significant effect of
FCF and profitability on dividends payout. Utamiand Inanga (2011) examined the relationship between
the Agency cost of FCF,dividends, and the financial leverage, depending on a sample of Indonesian
companies during the period (1994 – 2007), and they found that there is statistically significant effect of
FCF on dividends, and non- statistically significant effect on the financial leverage. Finally, Adelegan (2003)
examined the effect of FCF on the changes in dividends depending on the financial data of 63companies
listed in the Nigerian financial market during the period (1984 1997), and he found that there is a statistically
significant effect of FCF on dividends.
A review of the previous studies appears that there is a statistically significant effect of FCF on
dividends payout in the studies of Adelegan (2003), Parsian and Koloukhi(2013), Cheng et al., (2014),and
Utami and Inanga(2011), and non statistically significant effect of FCF on dividends payout in the studies
of Tijjani and Sani (2016), Sindhu (2014), and non-statistically significant effect of FCF on financial leverage
in the study of Utami and Inanga (2011).
THE STUDY METHODOLOGY
In the methodology researchers spoke about the study population, the study variables, how he measures
them, the statistical techniques, the hypotheses test, and the results discussion.
THE STUDY POPULATION
The study population consists of the 58 industrial companies listed in the AFM. The study depends on the
financial reports of these companies during the period (2005-2014).
THE STUDY VARIABLES
The study examines the effect of FCF (interdependent variable), on the financial leverage (dependant
variable) and the dividends payout (dependant variable) that measure the financial policies of the company.was
well controlled variable and control a company’s size.
Table 2
Variables, variables’ kinds, and Variables measurement
Variables Variable kind Measure Symbol
Free cash Flow dependant FCF ÷ Total Assts FCF
Financial Leverage interdependent Debts ÷ Total Assts LEV
Dividends payout interdependent Dividends ÷ The Company’s market value DIV
The Company’s Size Control variable Log assets SIZE
To measure the free cash flow the model of Brigham and Ehrhardt, (2008)was used, which is
represented by the following equation:
5International Journal of Economic Research
The effect of Free Cash Flow on the Companies’ Financial Polices: Evidence from Jordan
FCF i.t = EBIT i.t (1-T) + DE i.t - WC i.t - CAPEX i.t
Where FCF represents free cash flow for the company i in the period t.
EBIT represents income before interest and taxes for the company i in the period t.
DE represents depreciation, Depletion, Amortization expenses of the company i in thperiod t.
WC represents the change in the working capital of the company i in the period t and period t-1
CAPEX represents the Capital expenditures of the company i in the period t.
Financial leverage was measured by dividing total debts by the total assets, as in the studies of Hordar
and Tehrani (2015) and Khan et al., (2012). Dividend payout was measured by dividing dividends by the
company’s market value, as in the study of Utami and Inanga(2011). The company Size variable was
measured by using the logarithm of the company’s total assets.
STATISTICAL METHODS
In the study the averages and standard deviations were used to describe the variables characteristics, simple
regression analysis was used and to test the studies hypotheses, and Kolmogorov – Smirnovtechnique to
test the normal distribution of variables.
According to the descriptive statistics which was contained in Table No.3, the Standard deviations in
the variables data of all companies were low, the biggest figure was associated with a standard deviation of
the assets’and the least figure was associated with variable FCF.
Table 3
Variables’ descriptivestatistics
Variables N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
FCF 58 -0.111 0.178 0.096 0.079
LEV 58 0.404 0.82 0.546 0.122
DIV 58 0.162 0.72 0.357 0.186
Size 58 9 10 9.7 0.483
To test the normal distribution of the study’s variables, Kolmogorov – Smirnov test was used, Table
4 appears that the relative importance of variables of FCF, LEV, and DIV was greater than 0.05, this
means that each of these variables had a normal distribution, while the companies’ Size variable didn’t
distributed normal.
Table 4
The normal distribution of the variables
Variables Kolmogorov - Smirnov Sig.
LEV 0.196 0.200*
DIV 0.179 0.200*
FCF 0.25 0.076
SIZE 0.433 0
International Journal of Economic Research 6
Musa Abdel Latif Ibrahim Alnawaiseh, Rania Mohammad Alomari, Firas Al-Rawashdeh & Mahmoud barakat alnawaiseh
Hypothesis testing and analysis of results
To test the study’s hypotheses, simple regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between
the different variables of the study
H02: There is no statistically significant effect of FCF on the financial leverage of the Jordanian
industrial companies which were listed on the ASE.
To test this hypothesis, simple regression between FCF and the financial leverage has been used in
accordance with the following model:
LEV it = 0 + 1 * FCF it + 2 * SIZE it + (1)
Where LEV represents the financial leverage of the company i in period t, and FCF represents free
cash flows of the company i in period t, and to avoid the disadvantages of depending on a single variable,
a company’s size has been entered in the model and measured by Log assets, represents the standard
error.
Table 5 appears the analysis of the relationship between FCF and LEV.
Table 5
The regression coefficients of the effect of FCF on Financial Leverage
Model Unstandardized Standardized t Sig. t R R2
Coefficients Coefficients
B Beta
1 (constant) 0.654 14.421
FCF -1.122 -0.729 -3.014 0.0000.017 0.729 a 0.532
Dependent Variable: LEV.
Table 5 appears that the value of R2 (0.532), this means that a 53.2% of the total deviations in
Leverage variable can be interpreted by the linear relationship in the model (1), and 46.8% was due to
random factors didn’t included in the model, and any increase in FCF by one unit, LEV willbe decreased by
0.468 units.
From table 5 we can conclude the model that appears the relationship between FCF and LEV (see
model no. 2)
LEV = 0.654 - 1.122 × FCF (2)
Table 5 also appears that there is a statistically significant negative effect of FCF on LEV, because the
value of p that accompanying with t statistics less than (0.05), so that the hypothesis H01 should be
rejected, this means that there is a statistically significant effect of FCF on LEV.
H02: There is no statistically significant effect of FCF on dividendpayout in the Jordanian industrial
companies listed on the ASE.
To test this hypothesis simple regression between FCF and dividend payout has been used in accordance
with the following model:
7International Journal of Economic Research
The effect of Free Cash Flow on the Companies’ Financial Polices: Evidence from Jordan
DIV I, t = 0 + 1 FCF i, t + 1 * SIZE i, t + 3
Where DIV represents dividends payout for the company i in period t, and to avoid the defects of depending
on a single variable, a company’s size is entered as a control variable and is measured by Log assets.
Table 6
The regression coefficients of the effect of FCF on Dividends payout
Model Unstandardized Standardized t Sig. t R R Square FChange Sig. F
Coefficients Coefficients
B Beta
1 (constant) 0.301 3.063 0.016 0.248 a 0.062 0.525 0.489
FCF 0.548 0.248 0.724 0.489
Dependent Variable: Div.
Table 6 appears that the value of R2 (0.062), this means 6.2% of the total deviations in dividends
payout values can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables, and 93.8% were due to
random factors that didn’t included in the model(see model 4).
DIV = 0.301+ 0.584 × FCF (4)
Table 6 also appears that there is a positive and statistically significant effect of FCF and dividends
payout, because the value of p is greater than (0.05), so that the H01is accepted, and this means that there
is no statistically significant effect of FCF on dividend payout in the Jordanian industrial companies listed
in AFM.
CONCLUSIONS
It can be inferred, coming from a review of previous studies and the results of the current study:
1. The Financial Leverage is a financial instrument that helps in controlling the administration’s use
of FCF in preparing the dividend policy, borrowing policy and investment policy.
2. The effect of FCF on dividend payout depends on the level of growth, capital structure, and the
size of the company, changes in economic policies (Adelegan, 2003).
3. The Results of the study shows that there is a statistically significant effect of FCF on the
financial leverage in the Jordanian industrial companies. This result is consistent with the results
of Razaei and Jafari (2013) study, and doesn’t consistent with the studies of Utami and Inanga
(2011), and Mustafa and Chae (2012).
4. the study shows that there is un statistically significant effect of FCF on dividends payout, this
result is consistent with the results of the studies of Lincing, (2005), Tijjani and Sani (2016), and
Sindhu (2014), and doesn’t consistent with the results of the studies of Adelegan (2003), Parsian
and Koloukhi (2013), Cheng et al., (2014), and Utami and Inanga (2011).
5. The result of this study regarding the impact of FCF on dividends payout may not agree with
the logic which says that if the company achieves an increase in FCF with profits, it should
International Journal of Economic Research 8
Musa Abdel Latif Ibrahim Alnawaiseh, Rania Mohammad Alomari, Firas Al-Rawashdeh & Mahmoud barakat alnawaiseh
announce dividend. This will increase investors’ demand on its shares, and will increase its share
price, and will increase the Owner’s wealth, however, only 15 % from the Jordanian industrial
companies did that, because agency problems.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In light of the previous findings, the study recommends the following:
1. Companies should focus on disclosure in accordance with the requirements of IAS 1.
2. The interested bodies of accounting should choose a particular definition of FCF to help users
in calculating this important index, which results in decisions of building the leverage and dividend
policy.
REFERENCES
Abor, J and Bopkin. G. (2010), Investment opportunities, corporate finance, and dividend payout policy: Evidence from
emerging markets. Studies in Economic and Finance, Vol. 27, No. 3, and pp: 180-194.
Adelegan.O. J. (2003), An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Cash Flow and Dividend Policy in Pakistan,
International Business Research, Vol.3, No. 3, pp: 210-221, Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/ibr.
Amidu M. and Abor J. (2006), “Determinants of dividend payout ratios in Ghana”, The Journal of Risk Finance, Issue 7, pp.
136-145.
Barkholder, M., and Tehrani, R. (2015), Investigating the effect of free cash flow, dividend and financial leverage on
earning management in listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange, International Journal of Humanities and Culture
Studies, ISSN 2356-5926, Issue 2015, available at http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index.
Brigham, Eugene F., and Ehrhardt Michael C. (2008), Financial Management : Theory and practice, South-Western, Cengege
Learning, Australia, pp. 93-101.
Brush, T. H., Bromiley, P., and Hendrickx, M. (2000), The free cash flow hypothesisfor sales growth and firm performance.
Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 455-472.
Cardso, FabricioTerci, Martinez, Antonio, Lopo, and Teixeira, Aridelmo J. C. (2014), Free Cash Flow and Earnings
Management in Brazil: The Negative Side of Financial Slack, Globel Journal ofManaement and Business Research: D
Accounting and Auditing , Vol. 14, Issue 1, version 1, pp. 84-96.
Cheng, Zijian, Cullinan, Charles P., and Zhang Junrui. (2014), Free Cash Flow, Growth Opportunities, and Dividends:
Does Cross-Listing of Shares Matter?, The Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 587- 597.
Chu, J. (2011), Agency Cost under the Restriction of Free Cash Flow. Journal of Service Science and Management, Issue 4, pp.
79-85.
Cofee, J. (2002), Racing towards the top? : The impact of cross-listings, and stockmarket competition on international
corporate governance, Columbia Law Review, 102, PP. 1757-1783.
DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Stulz, R. (2004), Dividend Policy, Agency Costs and Earned Equity. Working paper.
University of Southern California No. 10.
Fleming, G., Heaney, R., & McCosker, R. (2005), Agency costs and ownership structure in Australia. Pacific-Basin Finance
Journal, Issue 13, pp. 29–52.
Friedlo, G.T., and Shleifor, L.L.F. (2003), Essential of FinancialAnalysis.Copy right c, JohnWiley and Sons, Inc.New Jersey,
p 93.
Griffin Paul, Lont David, Sun Yuan., (2010), Agency Problems and Audit Fees Further Tests of the Free Cash Flow
Hypothesis. Accounting & Finance, Vol. 50, Issue 2, pp. 321–350.
9International Journal of Economic Research
The effect of Free Cash Flow on the Companies’ Financial Polices: Evidence from Jordan
Karpavicius, S., and Yu. F. (2012), A test of the free cash flow hypothesis: The impact of increased institutional holdings
on firms characteristics, Working paper, No. 1910976, Social Science Research Net, Retrieved from http://
papers.ssrn.com.
Khan, Asma, Kaleem,Ahmad, Nazir, Mian, Sajid, and Khan , Kaleem.2012. Voluntarily contribution and Agency cost of
Free Cash Flow: Evidence from Manufacturing sector of Pakistan, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research,Vol.
2, No.7, pp. 6882-6888, ISSN2090-4304, Available at http://textroad.com.
Mollah, A. S., Keasey, K. and Sort, H. (2000), The influence of agency costs on dividend policy in an emerging market:
evidence from the Dhaka Stock Exchange. Available at http://www.bath.ac.uk/cds/enbs-papers-pdfs/molah-new.pdf
Oded, Jacob. (2009), Payout Policy, Financial Flexibility, and Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Available at SSRN: http://
ssrn.com/abstract=1344556 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1344556.
Parsian, Houssein and Koloukhi, Amir Shams (2013), A study on the Effect of free Cash Flow and Profitability Current
Ratio: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange Evidence, Management Letters 4, pp; 63- 70, available at SSRN:// http
://ssrn.com/ abstract_id= 2464012.
Razaei, MojtabA and Jafari ,Seyedeh, Mahbobeh (2015), Identifying the Relationship between Financial Leverage and
Cash Flows of the Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 8, No. 27,
DOI:10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i27/82942. ISSN(online): 0974-5645.
Richardson, S. (2006), Over-Investment of Free Cash Flow.Review of Accounting Studies, No. 11, pp: 159-189. Available at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-9012-1.
Tijjane,Bashir, and Sani A.A. (2016), An Empirical Analysis of Free Cash Flow and Dividend Policy in Nigerian Oil and
Gas Sector, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol.7, No.12, and pp: 154-160, ISSN 2222-1697.
Sindhu, Muzammal, Ilyas. (2014), Relationship between free cash flow and dividend: Moderating role of firm size, Research
Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol. 5, No. 5, ISSN 2222-1697 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2847 (On line), pp. 16-23.
Utami, S.R., and Inanga , E.L., (2011), Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Dividend Policy, and Leverage of Firms in
Indonesia. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Issue .33, pp:7-24. ISSN 1450-2275,
available at http://ww.eurojournals.com.
Wang, George Yungchih. (2010), The Impact of Free Cash Flows and Agency Costs on Firm Performance, J. Service Science
& Management, Vol.3, pp: 408-418, doi:10.4236/jssm.2010.34047, published online at http://wwwpSci RP.org/Journal/
jssm.
Weygant, J.J., Kimmel, P.D., and Kieso, D.E. (2012), Accounting Principles. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New Jersey, p 634.
Wu, Lingling. (2004), The Impact of Ownership Structure on Debt Financing of Japanese Firms with the Agency Cost of
Free Cash Flow. EFMA 2004, Basel Meetings Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=488042or http:/
/dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.488042.
Zhang, Y. (2009), Are Debt and Incentive Compensation Substitutes in Controlling the Free Cash Flow Agency Problem?
Financial Management, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 507-541.
Zhou, J., Zhang, T., and Cui, S. (2011), Cross listing, corporate governance and corporate performance: Empirical evidence
of Hong-Kong listed Chinese companies. Nankai Business Review international, Vol. 2, No.3, pp. 275-288.
Zurigat, Zaid, I.S, Iaad, Sartawi, Mustafa, Aleassa, Hasan (2014), Empirical Investigation of Free Cash Flow Hypothesis:
Evidence from Jordanian Capital Market, International Business Research, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 137- 148, ISSN1913-9004.
... The relationship between EM and surplus free cash flow (SFCF) has been examined in developed countries, with little attention paid to developing countries (see Cardoso et al., 2014;Sari et al., 2021;Toumeh et al., 2020a;Toumeh et al., 2020b). Also, Jordanian companies hold a large amount of cash (Al-Amarneh, 2015;Alnawaiseh & Alomari, 2017), creating a good impetus for the present research to investigate income-increasing DAC in the situation of SFCF in Jordan. ...
Article
Full-text available
The objective of this paper is to examine the impacts of stock market segmentations (SMS) and surplus free cash flow (SFCF) on income-increasing discretionary accruals. The study also provides the initial evidence regarding the influence of audit quality (AQ) as a moderating variable on those relationships. A sample of non-financial firms was taken from the list of Amman Stock Exchange over the period 2013-2019. Using Huber-White's sandwich estimator for pooled OLS regression, the current research presents empirical evidence harmonious with the prediction in all hypotheses. Further, the findings documents that a Big 4 auditor weakens the SMS-DAC and SFCF-DAC associations, which suggests that the role of Big 4 audit firms is effective in mitigating management's opportunistic behaviour. However, the reported results provide beneficial information to investors, regulators, external auditors, policymakers, shareholders, and other countries with similar institutional environment. The objective of this paper is to examine the impacts of stock market segmentations (SMS) and surplus free cash flow (SFCF) on income-increasing discretionary accruals. The study also provides the initial evidence regarding the influence of audit quality (AQ) as a moderating variable on those relationships. A sample of non-financial firms was taken from the list of Amman Stock Exchange over the period 2013-2019. Using Huber-White's sandwich estimator for pooled OLS regression, the current research presents empirical evidence harmonious with the prediction in all hypotheses. Further, the findings documents that a Big 4 auditor weakens the SMS-DAC and SFCF-DAC associations, which suggests that the role of Big 4 audit firms is effective in mitigating management's opportunistic behaviour. However, the reported results provide beneficial information to investors, regulators, external auditors, policymakers, shareholders, and other countries with similar institutional environment.
... As well, free cash flow is also considered a significant resource for companies to maximize shareholders value (Shadmehri et al., 2017). Often, cash is employed, for example, in increasing dividends, developing new products, maintaining assets, reducing company's debt, buying back stocks, or acquiring other companies (Alnawaiseh, Alomari, Al-Rawashdeh, and Alnawaiseh, 2017). Conversely, management may tend to hold the surplus cash flow under their control to preserve their power (Mansourlakoraj & Sepasi, 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
The current research aims at providing evidence concerning the influence of surplus free cash flow (SFCF) and stock market segmentations (SMS) on income-increasing earnings management practices in Jordan. The results, based on a sample of all non-financial companies that were listed on the Amman Stock Exchange (ASE) from 2013 to 2017, confirm the research hypotheses. The Huber-White’s sandwich standard errors for randomeffects regression was used as the primary statistical tool for this study. The findings revealed a significant and positive association between SFCF and income-boosting discretionary accruals (DAC). As well, the results found that SMS was significantly and positively associated with the positive DAC. This research adds value to scholarship by investigating the impact of SMS variable on earnings management. To the best available knowledge, this relationship has not been examined either in Jordan or elsewhere in the world. Further, this is the first empirical attempt to investigate the effect of SFCF on earnings management in Jordan, which provides meaningful information for companies seeking to understand and reduce agency problems within the Jordanian context.
... Also, Jordan adopted financial liberalization in 1990, which, consequently, has led to a boost in the flexibility given to managers in controlling the cash holding (Zurigat et al., 2014). Alnawaiseh et al. (2017) indicated that many listed companies have free cash flow, but that only 15 per cent of Jordanian companies employed free cash flow efficiently. concluded that the free cash flow and agency problems existed among non-financial companies listed on the ASE. ...
Article
Management engages in earnings manipulation for different reasons. This article argues that low-growth firms with high free cash flow will opt for income-increasing earnings management in order to obscure the low profits derived from their investments in negative net present value (NPV) projects. On the other hand, we argue that the listed companies might be interested in being listed in the first market due to its privileges and to preserve the competitiveness, through managing their earnings upwardly, so that they can satisfy the condition of achieving a particular earnings limit. This article should advance the body of earnings management literature in the Jordanian context by examining the effect of the moderating role of an independent audit committee (IAC) in the association between surplus free cash flow (SFCF) and income-increasing discretionary accruals (DAC). Further, this is the initial empirical attempt to investigate the moderation effect of IAC between stock market segmentations (SMS) and positive DAC. The results of this current study offer original and beneficial information for the Jordanian government and other countries with a similar institutional environment because the study promotes the application of applying IAC as an efficient tool to constrain management behaviour towards manipulation of the accruals. On top of that, this research offers information concerning the prevailing situation of earnings management practices and corporate governance in Jordan, in which shareholders, local and international investors, policymakers, regulators and academic researchers are interested. Finally, panel data analyses and various statistical techniques are employed to derive conclusions.
... FCF is company's cash or fund that can be distributed to creditors or shareholders that are not used as working capital or investment in fixed assets [3]. [4] FCF can be used by managers to pay dividends or debt / loan interest to creditors or lenders, and sometimes can be used to buy new assets, to buy back the company shares, as well as to invest. [5] Dividend policy is an activity or practice carried out by the management to make decisions about dividend payments in the current year, which in this case it concerns on the amount to be paid and how the distribution will be done to shareholders. ...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this paper is to examine the statistical relationship between cash flow and corporate debt using multiple linear regression model. In addition to cash flow, the size of the enterprise was used as an additional explanatory variable in the model. Since there is a great deal of research in the relevant literature on the relationship between profit and debt, this paper uses cash flow instead of profit, which is a contribution to the existing literature. The results of the regression analysis indicate a negative impact of cash flow on indebtedness, which also confirms packing order theory. In addition, the results show a positive (albeit weaker) impact of corporate size on debt.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of firm volunteer contribution (donations, kind gift and charities) on the agency cost of Free Cash Flow (FCF). Either the volunatrily contribution increase the agency cost of free cash flow or mitigate it. To measure the agency cost of free cash flow firm free cash flow is used as a proxy. Voluntarily contribution is measured by the amount of cash paid out by the firm in the form of donations, charities and kind gift. Panel data of 54 manufacturing firms for the period 2006 to 2010 has been collected from the manufacturing sector of Pakistan. Results revealed that the firm contribution in donations, charities and gift increase the agency cost of free cash flow. Managers feel prestige in distributing the owner's cash in the form of donations, charities and kind gift. The paper shows the impact of voluntarily contribution on the agency cost of free cash flow. These indicates that the firms that want to maximize the value of the firms by reducing the agency cost of free cash flow should also keep in view the level of firm cash that is distributed by the firm in the form of free cash.
Article
Full-text available
The paper is to determine the impact of free cash flow on dividend policy of oil and gas companies in Nigeria. The data was collected from annual reports and accounts of the sampled companies for the period of twelve years from 2003 to 2014. Data is analyzed by means of descriptive statistics to provide summary statistics for the variables and correlation analysis is also carried out using Pearson correlation technique for the correlation between the dependent and explanatory variables. Multiple regression technique was used to analyze the data using STATA software version 12.00. The study found that free cash flow and earnings per share have positive effects on the dividend policy while a negative significant relationship is found between leverage and dividend policy of listed oil and gas companies Nigeria. Companies in which high proportion of shares are held by managers are more reluctant in paying a higher dividend. Hence, The study recommends that companies in the oil and gas sector should endeavor to improve the level of free cash and profitability while reducing the level of leverage thereby paying a higher dividend payout policy.
Article
Full-text available
Decision making about dividend payout is one of the most important decision that companies should encounter. Identifying factors that influence dividends can help managers in making an appropriate dividend policy. In the other side, companies’ dividend payouts over time and with a stable manner may influence on stock price, future earnings growth and finally investor's evaluation about owners' equity. Hence, investigating the factors influencing dividend payout ratio is of high importance. In this research, we investigate the effects of various factors on dividend payout ratio of Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) listed companies. We use time series regression (panel data) in order to test the hypothesis of this study. This study provides empirical evidences by choosing a sample of 102 companies over the time span of 2005-2010. The result shows that independent variables of free cash flow and profitability current ratio have negative and significant impact on dividend payout ratio; whereas, the independent variable of leverage ratio has a positive and significant impact on dividend payout ratio. The other independent ratio such as size of the company, growth opportunities and systematic risk do not have any significant influence on dividend payout ratio.
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to investigate free cash flow hypothesis proposed by Jensen (1986). Data pertaining to 102 non-financial firms listed on ASE during the period of 1998–2009 are analyzed using pooled and panel data methods. Contrary to Jensen (1986) proposition, we found that debt and dividend are not substitute techniques for mitigating agency costs of free cash flow in the Jordanian capital market, rather, they are complementary to each other. However, debt is used more than dividend for stability consideration of dividend policy where the use of debt and dividend is largely affected by dividend smoothing and leverage target adjustment considerations. Moreover, we found that low growth firms use debt more than dividends.
Article
Full-text available
The article investigates whether Brazilian firms with excess free cash flow (FCF) and low growth perspectives (Jensen. 1986), when there is excess FCF, accompanied by limited growth perspectives, managers have incentives to camouflage the impact of investments in projects with negative net present value (NPV) by presenting inflated profits. The study includes firms listed on the BMF&Bovespa in the period from 2008 to 2012. Discretionary accruals (DA) were estimated by the modified Jones model and then the relationship between FCF and DA was ascertained by multiple regression. The results indicate that firms with low growth perspectives and excess FCF are more likely to manage earnings to increase profits. Shareholding concentration and adoption of IFRS moderate this relationship (FCF x DA), i.e., in practical terms they restrict the propensity to engage in this type of earnings management. This study is relevant by identifying a tendency to manage earnings. Regulators and investors should pay particular attention to the accounting results disclosed in the presence of excess free cash flow and low growth perspectives.
Article
p>Corporate dividend policy should strike a balance between paying cash to shareholders when there are excess resources and retaining sufficient resources in the company to fund worthwhile projects. Using excess resources to pay dividends can help to avoid overinvestment by the company in inappropriate projects and/or other potential misuse of funds by managers for their own benefit. However, companies also need to avoid paying too much in dividends to ensure that adequate resources are available within the company to fund projects that could increase shareholder wealth (i.e., to avoid underinvestment). Cross-listing of company shares can improve governance and oversight, which may make the dividend policies of cross-listed companies more likely to avoid both over and underinvestment. Using a sample of Chinese listed companies from 2003 to 2011, we find that cross-listed companies pay higher dividends than non-cross-listed companies when there are excess resources (measured by free cash flow), thereby reducing the potential for overinvestment/misuse of the resources by cross-listed companies. We also find that the dividends of cross-listed companies are lower than those of non-cross-listed companies when there are greater growth opportunities (measure by the market-to-book ratio), reflecting the reduced potential for underinvestment by cross-listed companies. We find more limited evidence that cross-listings may influence the relationship between dividend volatility and free cash flow and growth opportunities. Overall, our results suggest that companies cross-listing their shares have dividend policies that are more responsive than those of non-cross-listed companies to potential shareholder concerns about over and underinvestment.</p
Article
The objectives of the study are to examine how firms in Indonesia, with substantial free cash flow, control agency cost of free cash flows, and test the effect of agency costs on dividend and leverage. It also tests the difference in agency costs between companies that pay and companies that do not pay regular dividends to their shareholders. In testing the relevant hypotheses, we use agency costs variables. Profit, growth, risk, size, and free cash flow, are used to measure for the level of agency costs of the firms, while leverage and dividends are used as proxies for financial policies to address free cash flow problems. By using regression analysis, and collecting the data of firms in Indonesia over the period 1994-2007, our results show that there is a negative insignificant effect of free cash flow on dividend, but imply positive significant effect of free cash flow on leverage. Regression results also show negative significant effect of free cash flow on dividend, negative insignificant effect of growth on dividend, but positive significant effect of leverage on dividend. Meanwhile, we find positive but not statistically significant effect of profit, firm's size, and risk on dividend. For firms that have 5-years dividend payment period, we find positive significant effect of free cash flow on dividends while for firms that have less than 5-years dividend payment period, result shows negative significant effect. Finally, the effect of agency cost of free cash flow on leverage for both categories of firms is positive but not significant.