ArticlePDF Available

Antioxidants: An Overview on the Natural and Synthetic Types

Authors:
  • University of Sadat City Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute

Abstract and Figures

Antioxidants were used to prevent oxidation process in foods which lead to rancidity and browning, DNA oxidation and have manypositive physiological effects in human. The concentration and the absorption mechanism of natural antioxidants are important in obtainingthe maximum beneficial effect. The sources of antioxidants must be carefully considered to maximize absorption and avoid the toxicity ofhigher concentration of synthetic groups. A general lack of information about antioxidants indicates by a survey of the general public. Anorganized effort to educate individuals about foods rich in natural antioxidants and the ability to recognize the major synthetic antioxidantson food labels would be highly beneficial, though more research needs to be done to fully understand their physiological effects.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Natural and synthetic antioxidants Section C-Review
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2017, 6(8), 365-375 DOI: 10.17628/ecb.2017.6.365-375
365
ANTIOXIDANTS: AN OVERVIEW ON THE NATURAL AND
SYNTHETIC TYPES
Emad M. Atta[a,b]*, Nawal H. Mohamed[c,d] and Ahmed A. M. Abdelgawad[d]
Keywords: Oxidants, antioxidants, definition, natural and synthetic types, assay methods.
Antioxidants were used to prevent oxidation process in foods which lead to rancidity and browning, DNA oxidation and have many
positive physiological effects in human. The concentration and the absorption mechanism of natural antioxidants are important in obtaining
the maximum beneficial effect. The sources of antioxidants must be carefully considered to maximize absorption and avoid the toxicity of
higher concentration of synthetic groups. A general lack of information about antioxidants indicates by a survey of the general public. An
organized effort to educate individuals about foods rich in natural antioxidants and the ability to recognize the major synthetic antioxidants
on food labels would be highly beneficial, though more research needs to be done to fully understand their physiological effects.
* Corresponding Authors
E-Mail: emadata@yahoo.com
[a] Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Jazan University,
Jazan, KSA
[b] Genetic Engeneering. and Biotechnology Research Institute,
University of Sadat City, Egypt
[c] Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Girls’ Section,
Jazan University, Jazan, KSA
[d] Aromatic and Medicinal Plants Department, Desert Research
Center, Cairo, Egypt
Introduction
Antioxidants go through several processes before they can
have consumed by the people. Researchers in the middle of
the twenty-first century after doing many researches found
that life span of people increases by the normal consumption
of anti-oxidants and also it prevents several fatal diseases.
At the end of 19th century, antioxidants are used for several
industrial processes like prevention of metal corrosion,
rubber vulcanization. The scientists found that these
substances or anti-oxidants protects the metal from
corrosion and limited the oxidation of the metals.1-2
Antioxidants are widely used as an ingredient in dietary
supplement for promoting good health and preventing
diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease. In addition,
they are also used as preservatives for foods. This indeed
happened in the mid. 20th century. It all started with the
attempts by scientists to extend the life of foods. By
combining antioxidants with foods which have high
unsaturated fat, the tests were able to prevent the onset of
rancidity - a nasty process by which the unsaturated fats
break down and produce a rancid-like smell and taste.3 As
this process continued; new information was brought to light,
it was quickly discovered that a few of the key and vital
vitamins - essential in the human diet were actually able to
be classified as antioxidants too. This meant that over the
past 1000 years, people had been consuming antioxidants on
a daily basis.4
The aim of this review is to explore the different types of
natural and synthetic antioxidants, the suggested mechanism
and physiological effects of each type as well, in addition to
the potential health risks associated with consuming the
synthetic antioxidants. On the other hand, an overview on
the definitions, uses, popular methods to assay antioxidant
activity was stated.
Oxidation of foods
Oxidation process
Most foods are made up of several organic compounds
that can easily undergo oxidation. Lipids (such as fats, oils,
and waxes) in general have the greatest tendency to lose
electrons. Auto-oxidation of lipids in food Triggered by
exposure to light, heat, ionizing radiation, metal ions or
metallo-protein catalysts can have a deteriorating effect on
the food colour, flavour, texture, quality, and safety. Fats
contained in food are chemically composed of triglycerides
and oxidation leading to the rancidity of foods occurs at the
unsaturated sites of the triglycerides.5
Oxidants
The most common oxidants in biological systems are free
radicals. Free radicals are atoms, molecules or ions with
unpaired electrons that are highly unstable and active
towards chemical reactions with other molecules. An
unpaired electron in these free radicals, causes them to seek
out and capture electrons from other substances in order to
stabilize themselves. Although the initial attack causes the
odd electron to be paired, another free radical is formed in
the process, causing a chain reaction to occur.6
In the biological systems, the free radicals are often
derived from oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur molecules. These
free radicals are parts of groups of molecules called reactive
oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and
reactive sulphur species (RSS). For example, ROS includes
free radicals such as superoxide anion (O2-), perhydroxyl
radical (HO2•), hydroxyl radical (·OH), nitric oxide and
other species such as hydrogen peroxide(H2O2), singlet
oxygen (O2), hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and peroxynitrite
Natural and synthetic antioxidants Section C-Review
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2017, 6(8), 365-375 DOI: 10.17628/ecb.2017.6.365-375
366
(ONOO-).7 RNS are derived from nitric oxide through the
reaction with O2- to form ONOO-. RSS are easily formed
from thiols by reaction with ROS.8 ROS are produced during
cellular metabolism and functional activities.
Formation of free radicals in cells
Free radicals can be formed in 3 ways, (i) by homolytic
cleavage of covalent bond of a normal molecule, with each
fragment retaining one of the paired electrons, (ii) by loss of
single electron from normal molecule and (iii) by addition of
a single electron to a normal molecule. They are constantly
being generated in vivo.9
Four endogenous sources appear to account for most of
the oxidants produced by cells.
(i) Normal aerobic respiration in which
mitochondria consume O2, reduces it by
sequential steps to produce O2, H2O2, and -OH as
byproducts.
(ii) Bacteria or virus infected cells get destroyed by
phagocytosis with an oxidative burst of nitric
oxide (NO), O2-, H2O2 and OCl.
(iii) Peroxisomes produce H2O2 as a byproduct of
fatty acid and other lipid molecular degradation,
which is further degraded by catalase. Evidence
suggests that, certain conditions favor escape of
some of the peroxide from degradation,
consequently releasing it into other
compartments of the cell and increasing
oxidative stress leading to DNA damage.
(iv) Animal Cytochrome P450 enzymes are one of the
primary defense systems that provides protection
against natural toxic chemicals from plants, the
major source of dietary toxins. Even these
enzymes are protective against acute toxic effects
from foreign chemicals, yet they may generate
some oxidative byproducts that damage DNA.10-
13
Effect of oxidants on body tissue
Excessive amounts of free radicals can have deleterious
effects on many molecules including protein, lipid, RNA
and DNA since they are very small and highly reactive.
ROS can attack bases in nucleic acids, amino acid side
chains in proteins and double bonds in unsaturated fatty
acids, in which ·OH is the strongest oxidant. ROS attacking
macromolecules is often termed oxidative stress. Cells are
normally able to defend themselves against ROS damage
through the use of intracellular enzymes to keep the
homeostasis of ROS at a low level.
However, during times of environmental stress and cell
dysfunction, ROS levels can increase dramatically, and
cause significant cellular damage in the body. Thus,
oxidative stress significantly contributes to the pathogenesis
of inflammatory disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer,
diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, cataracts, autism and aging.14-
17 In order to prevent or reduce the ROS induced oxidative
damage, the human body and other organisms have
developed an antioxidant defense system that includes
enzymatic, metal chelating and free radical scavenging
activities to neutralize these radicals after they have formed.
In addition, intake of dietary antioxidants may help to
maintain an adequate antioxidants status in the body.
Antioxidants
In foods, antioxidants have been defined as ‘substances
that in small quantities are able to prevent or greatly retard
the oxidation of easily oxidisable materials such as fats,18
therefore, in food science antioxidants are usually equated
with chain-breaking inhibitors of lipid peroxidation, but not
exclusively so. Many antioxidants have been studied and are
used in a wide range of foods including beverages.
Therefore, for foods and beverages, antioxidants are
molecules that can be equated with the protection of
macromolecules from oxidation.19 In biological systems the
accepted definition is that antioxidant is any substance that,
when present at low concentrations compared to those of an
oxidisable substrate, significantly delays or prevents
oxidation of that substrate.20-21 This is a broader definition
encompassing many vulnerable macromolecules (e.g. DNA,
lipids and proteins) that can be affected by oxidation. In
biological terms, it is accepted that any molecule that can
retard or prevent the action of oxidants could be considered
to be an antioxidant.22 Such a broad definition means that
compounds that inhibit specific oxidizing enzymes, react
with oxidants before they damage molecules, sequester
dangerous metal ions or even repair systems such as iron
transport proteins, can fit the definition. Antioxidants can
also be defined as substances that trap harmful forms of
oxygen and prevent them from damaging cells.23
Mechanistic definitions of antioxidants are usually focused
on the ability to be a hydrogen donor or an electron donor.
Many of the frequently cited assays of antioxidant capacity
can be broadly categorized as either hydrogen transfer
assays or single electron transfer reaction based assays.
These assays measure the radical scavenging capacity or the
reducing ability, respectively, not the preventative
antioxidant capacity of the sample.24
Antioxidants process
Antioxidants block the process of oxidation by
neutralizing free radicals. In doing so, the antioxidants
themselves become oxidized. How do they work? The two
possible pathways are chain-breaking and preventive.25
Chain-breaking: When a free radical release or abstracts
an electron, a second radical is formed. This molecule then
turns around and does the same thing to a third molecule,
continuing to generate more unstable products. The process
continues until termination occurs, either the radical is
stabilized by a chain-breaking antioxidant such as -
carotene and vitamins C and E, or it simply decays into a
harmless product.
Preventive: Antioxidant prevents oxidation by reducing
the rate of chain initiation. That is, by scavenging initiating
radicals, such antioxidants can thwart an oxidation chain
from ever setting in motion. They can also prevent oxidation
by stabilizing transition metal radicals such as copper and
iron.
Natural and synthetic antioxidants Section C-Review
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2017, 6(8), 365-375 DOI: 10.17628/ecb.2017.6.365-375
367
Mechanisms
If a compound inhibits the formation of free alkyl
radicals in the initiation step, or if the chemical compound
interrupts the propagation of the free radical chain, the
compound can delay the start or slow the chemical reaction
rate of lipid oxidation. The initiation of free radical
formation can be delayed by the use of metal chelating
agents, singlet oxygen inhibitors and peroxide stabilizers.
The propagation of free radical chain reaction can be
minimized by the donation of hydrogen from the
antioxidants and the metal chelating agents.26
(1) R:H + O::O + Initiator → R• + HOO•
(2) R• + O::O → ROO•
(3) ROO• + R:H → ROOH + R•
(4) RO:OH → RO• + HO•
(5) R::R + •OH → R:R-O•
(6) R• + R• → R:R
(7) R• + ROO• → ROOR
(8) ROO• + ROO• → ROOR + O2
(9) ROO• + AH → ROOH + A•
(10) ROO• + A• → ROOA.
Scheme 1. Mechanism of antioxidants’ action.
Antioxidant Defenses
Antioxidant means "against oxidation." Antioxidants work
to protect lipids from per oxidation by radicals. Antioxidants
are effective because they are willing to give up their own
electrons to free radicals. When a free radical gain the
electron from an antioxidant it no longer needs to attack the
cell and the chain reaction of oxidation is broken.27 After
donating an electron an antioxidant becomes a free radical
by definition. Antioxidants in this state are not harmful
because they have the ability to accommodate the change in
electrons without becoming reactive. The human body has
an elaborate antioxidant defense system. Antioxidants are
manufactured within the body and can also be extracted
from the food which humans eat such as fruits, vegetables,
seeds, nuts, meats, and oil.
Types of Antioxidants
Antioxidant system includes, antioxidant enzymes (e.g.,
SOD, GPx and reductase, CAT, etc.), nutrient-derived
antioxidants (e.g., ascorbic acid, tocopherols and
tocotrienols, carotenoids, glutathione and lipoic acid), metal
binding proteins (e.g., ferritin, lactoferrin, albumin, and
ceruloplasmin) and numerous other antioxidant
phytonutrients present in a wide variety of plant foods.
Dietary antioxidants, such as water-soluble vitamin C and
phenolic compounds, as well as lipid-soluble vitamin E and
carotenoids, present in vegetables contribute both to the first
and second defense lines against oxidative stress.28
Natural antioxidants
Natural antioxidant system is sorted in two major groups,
enzymatic and non- enzymatic.
Non-enzymatic antioxidants: Non-enzymatic antioxidants
include direct acting antioxidants, which are extremely
important in defense against oxidation stress. Most of them,
including ascorbic and lipoic acid, polyphenols and
carotenoids, are derived from dietary sources. The cell itself
synthesizes a minority of these molecules. Indirectly acting
antioxidants mostly include chelating agents and bind to
redoxmetals to prevent free radical generation.29
Vitamin E is a generic description for all tocopherol (Toc)
and tocotrienol (Toc-3) derivatives. Tocopherols have a
phytyl chain, while tocotrienols have a similar chain but
with three double bonds at positions 3',7' and 11'. Both
tocopherols and tocotrienols have four isomers, designated
as α-, β-, γ- and δ-, which differ by the number and position
of methyl groups on the chroman ring.30 All of these
molecules possess antioxidant activity, although -
tocopherol -Toc) is chemically and biologically the most
active.31-32 α-Tocopherol is the major vitamin E in vivo and
exerts the highest biological activity. Tocopherols are
present in polyunsaturated vegetable oils and in the germ of
cereal seeds, whereas tocotrienols are found in the aleurone
and subaleurone layers of cereal seeds and in palm oils.
Figure 1. Structure of vitamin E.
It has been reported that α-Toc-3 possessed 40- to 60-fold
higher antioxidant activity than α-Toc against ferrous
iron/ascorbate- and ferrous iron/NADPH-induced lipid
peroxidation in rat liver microsomes33 and that α-Toc-3
exhibited greater peroxyl radical scavenging potency than α-
Toc in liposomal membranes.34
The antioxidant reaction of α-tocopherol is not a reaction
with oxygen. Many molecules react with oxygen, but they
do so without being antioxidants. β-Carotene, for example,
Natural and synthetic antioxidants Section C-Review
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2017, 6(8), 365-375 DOI: 10.17628/ecb.2017.6.365-375
368
readily reacts with oxygen, but it is by no means an efficient
antioxidant.35 The basis of an antioxidant reaction is not the
removal of oxygen but the interception of the autoxidation
radical chain process which is not perpetuated by oxygen
but by the fatty acid.
α-Tocopherol reacts with fatty acid peroxyl radicals, the
primary products of lipid peroxidation, and intercepts the
chain reaction.36 What makes α-tocopherol such a highly
efficient antioxidant is (i) that it reacts with the peroxyl
radical extremely fast, much faster than to allow for the
peroxyl radical to do any other reactions; (ii) it takes away
the radical character from the oxidizing fatty acid and
prevents it from further radical reactions; (iii) in the
antioxidant reaction, α-tocopherol is turned into a fairly
stable radical. Under normal circumstances, it will only
react with another radical (either a tocopheroxyl radical or a
fatty acid peroxyl radical) to form stable, non-radical
products. In this setting, α-tocopherol is the most powerful
lipid soluble antioxidant known, and only recently novel
synthetic antioxidants have been developed that surpass α-
tocopherol’s antioxidant capacity.37 Chemically, abstraction
of the 6-OH hydrogen yields a tocopheroxyl radical.
Tocopherol can be restored by reduction of the tocopheroxyl
radical with redox-active reagents like vitamin C (ascorbate)
or ubiquinol.38-42 In homogeneous solution phase
autoxidation, the tocopheroxyl radical will react with a
second peroxyl radical to give non radical products. This
second reaction leads to the destruction of a tocopherol as an
antioxidant. Thus, one molecule of a-tocopherol can
terminate two autoxidation chains.
The main source for dietary uptake of vitamin E is plant
food (vegetables, fruits, seeds, and seed oils). Sunflower
seeds, olive oil, and almonds are rich sources of α-
tocopherol. While other seeds and seed oils generally
contain more γ-tocopherol than α-tocopherol, the opposite is
true for green leaves. β-Tocopherol and δ-tocopherol are the
least abundant, and so, in general, are the different
tocotrienols.43
Vitamin C (ascorbic acid and ascorbate) is a six-carbon
lactone which is synthesized from glucose by many animals.
Vitamin C is a water-soluble vitamin. As such, it scavenges
free radicals that are in an aqueous (water). When there is
insufficient vitamin C in the diet, humans suffer from the
potentially lethal deficiency disease scurvy.44
Vitamin C is an electron donor (reducing agent or
antioxidant), and probably all of its biochemical and
molecular functions can be accounted for by this function.
Vitamin C acts as an electron donor for 11 enzymes.45-46
Gastric juice vitamin C may prevent the formation of N-
nitroso compounds, which are potentially mutagenic.47 High
intakes of vitamin C correlate with reduced gastric cancer
risk,48 but a cause and effect relationship has not been
established. Vitamin C protects low-density lipoproteins ex
vivo against oxidation and may function similarly in the
blood.49
Vitamin C plays an important role in the production of
collagen. Collagen gives your skin elastic properties. As
people get older, their skin contains lower levels of collagen.
Most anti-aging creams, therefore, include plenty of Vitamin
C. This keeps the skin young and healthy by improving
elasticity.
Scheme 2. Formation of ascorbate radical.
A common feature of vitamin C deficiency is anaemia.
The antioxidant properties of vitamin C may stabilize folate
in food and in plasma, and increased excretion of oxidized
folate derivatives in human scurvy was reported.50 Vitamin
C promotes absorption of soluble non-haem iron possibly by
chelation or simply by maintaining the iron in the reduced
(ferrous, Fe2+) form.51-52 The effect can be achieved with the
amounts of vitamin C obtained in foods. However, the
amount of dietary vitamin C required to increase iron
absorption ranges from 25 mg upwards and depends largely
on the amount of inhibitors, such as phytates and
polyphenols, present in the meal.53 Vitamin C (ascorbate,
AscH-), for example, can donate a hydrogen atom to a free
radical molecule thereby neutralizing the free radical
(ascorbic acid, generally acts as an antioxidant by donating
hydrogen atoms from its own hydroxyl groups in order to
quench reactive radical species) and generating double
bonds in place of the lost hydrogen to make up for the lost
electron density. However, once this occurs, the Vitamin C
molecule itself is oxidized, and so it is reduced back into a
useable form of the Vitamin C molecule by a variety of
enzymes, including glutathione.
Scheme 3. Oxidation of Vitamin C.
But the ascorbic acid free radical is very stable because of
its resonance structure.54 In general, recent literature on the
interaction between vitamin C and vitamin E has provided
strong support for the non-enzymatic regeneration of α-
tocopherol from the α-tocopheroxyl radical, formed when α-
tocopherol scavenges a peroxyl radical (ROO), by ascorbic
acid.
Vitamin C is found in many fruits and vegetables.55 Citrus
fruits and juices are particular important sources of vitamin
C but other fruits including cantaloupe, honeydew melon,
Natural and synthetic antioxidants Section C-Review
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2017, 6(8), 365-375 DOI: 10.17628/ecb.2017.6.365-375
369
cherries, kiwi fruits, mangoes, papaya, strawberries, tangelo,
watermelon, and tomatoes also contain variable amounts of
vitamin C. Vegetables such as cabbage, broccoli, Brussels
sprouts, beansprouts, cauliflower, kale, mustard greens, red
and green peppers, peas, tomatoes, and potatoes may be
more important sources of vitamin C than fruits. This is
particularly true because the vegetable supply often extends
for longer periods during the year than does the fruit supply.
-Carotene
Carotenoids are a widespread group of naturally occurring
fat-soluble colorants. In developed countries, 80-90% of the
carotenoid intake comes from fruit and vegetable
consumption. Of the more than 700 naturally occurring
carotenoids identified, only six of them -carotene, β-
cryptoxanthin, α-carotene, lycopene, lutein and zeaxanthin)
account for more than 95% of total blood carotenoids. β-
Carotene (BC) is a naturally occurring orange-colored
carbon-hydrogen carotenoid, abundant in yellow-orange
fruits and vegetables and in dark green, leafy vegetables.56 It
is also the most widely distributed carotenoid in foods.57 BC
undergoes trans (E) to cis (Z) isomerization,58 whereas the
(all-E)-form is the predominant isomer found in unprocessed
carotene rich plant foods.59-60
Nutrition has a significant role in the prevention of many
chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases (CVD),
cancers, and degenerative brain diseases.61 The consumption
of food-based antioxidants like BC seems to be useful for
the prevention of macular degeneration and cataracts.62 It is
also available in synthetic forms and is commercially
processed from substances such as palm oil and algae. BC
has potential antioxidant biological properties due to its
chemical structure and interaction with biological
membranes.63 It is well-known, that BC quenches singlet
oxygen with a multiple higher efficiency than α-
tocopherol.64 In addition, it was shown that (Z)-isomers of
BC possess antioxidant activity in vitro.65-67
The other strategy with which antioxidants prevent
oxidation is to use double bonds to donate electron density.
As the electrons in double bonds are less tightly held to the
molecule, they are more easily available for donation.
Generally, antioxidants that use this strategy are non-polar,
and contain hydrocarbon chains of moderate length. Three
prominent natural antioxidants that utilize this method are
carotene, lycopene, and vitamin A. Carotene and lycopene
have very similar mechanisms of antioxidant activity, as
both have similar chemical structures and fall into the
carotenoid family of molecules.
Scheme 4. Oxidation of carotene via the donation of an electron
from a double bond.
Phenolic antioxidants
Phenolic compounds are a large group of the secondary
metabolites widespread in plant kingdom. They are
categorized into classes depending on their structure and
subcategorized within each class according to the number
and position of hydroxyl group and the presence of other
substituents. The most widespread and diverse group of the
polyphenols are the flavonoids which are built upon C6-C3-
C6 flavone skeleton. In addition, other phenolic compounds
such as benzoic acid or cinnamic acid derivatives have been
identified in fruits and vegetables.68-69
Phenolic compounds, especially flavonoids, possess
different biological activities, but the most important are
antioxidant activity, capillary protective effect, and
inhibitory effect elicited in various stages of tumor.70-73
Phenolics are able to scavenge reactive oxygen species due
to their electron donating properties. Their antioxidant
effectiveness depends on the stability in different systems,
as well as number and location of hydroxyl groups. In many
in vitro studies, phenolic compounds demonstrated higher
antioxidant activity than vitamins and carotenoids.74-75
The major antioxidative phenolics in plants can be divided
into four general groups viz., phenolic acids (gallic,
protochatechuic, caffeic, and rosmarinic acids), diterpenes
(carnosol and carnosic acid), flavonoids (quercetin and
catechin), and volatile oils (eugenol, carvacrol, thymol, and
menthol).76 Phenolic acids generally act as antioxidants by
trapping free radicals whereas flavonoids can scavenge free
radicals and metal chelates as well.77
Many mechanisms have been proposed for polyphenol
prevention of oxidative stress and ROS/RNS generation
both in vitro and in vivo. Radical scavenging by polyphenols
is the most widely published mechanism for their
antioxidant activity. In this radical scavenging mechanism,
polyphenols sacrificially reduce ROS/RNS, such as OH,
O2-, NO, or OONO- after generation, preventing damage to
biomolecules or formation of more reactive ROS.78-80 The
spatial arrangement of substituents is perhaps a greater
determinant of antioxidant activity than the flavone
backbone alone. Consistent with most polyphenolic
antioxidants, both the configuration and total number of
hydroxyl groups substantially influence several mechanisms
of antioxidant activity.81-83
Selenium
Selenium (Se) is an essential trace element and its
deficiency in humans has been linked to increased risk of
various diseases, such as cancer and heart diseases. Good
food sources of selenium include fish, shellfish, red meat,
grains, eggs and chicken. Vegetables can also be a good
source if grown in selenium-rich soils. This mineral is
thought to help fight cell damage by oxygen-derived
compounds and thus may help protect against cancer. It is
best to get selenium through foods, as large doses of the
supplement form can be toxic. The level of Se generally
depends on its level in soil.84 Selenium is a mineral, not an
antioxidant nutrient. However, it is a component of
antioxidant enzymes. Since its discovery as an important
component of antioxidant enzymes, such as glutathione
peroxidase (GPx), thioredoxinreductase (TrxR) and
Natural and synthetic antioxidants Section C-Review
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2017, 6(8), 365-375 DOI: 10.17628/ecb.2017.6.365-375
370
iodothyroninedeiodinases (IDD), there has been an
increased interest in the study of other Se-containing
proteins (selenoproteins) or enzymes (selenoenzymes).85
The selenoenzymes that are found to have strong
antioxidant activity include six groups of the GPx-GPx1,
GPx3, GPx4, GPx5 and GPx6. These GPx play a significant
role in protecting cells against oxidative damage from ROS
and RNS, which include superoxide, hydrogen peroxide,
hydroxyl radicals, nitric oxide and peroxynitrite.86-87 The
other essential antioxidant selenoenzymes are the TrxR
where they use thioredoxin (Trx) as a substrate to maintain a
Trx/TrxR system in a reduced state for removal of harmful
hydrogen peroxide.88-89 There are three types of TrxR that
have been identified, and these include cytosolic TrxR1,
mitochondrial TrxR2 and spermatozoa-specific TrxR,
(SpTrxR).90-91 Increasing evidence suggests that
selenoprotein may also play a significant role in antioxidant
defense system in preventing attack from harmful ROS and
RNS.92-93
Enzymatic antioxidants
Antioxidant enzymes are capable of stabilizing, or
deactivating free radicals before they attack cellular
components. They act by reducing the energy of the free
radicals or by giving up some of their electrons for its use,
thereby causing it to become stable. In addition, they may
also interrupt with the oxidizing chain reaction to minimize
the damage caused by free radicals. By reducing exposure to
free radicals and increasing the intake of antioxidant enzyme
rich foods or antioxidant enzyme supplements, our body’s
potential to reducing the risk of free radical related health
problems is made more palpable.94 Antioxidant enzymes are,
therefore, absolutely critical for maintaining optimal cellular
and systemic health.
The repair enzymes that can recreate some antioxidants
are SOD, GPx, glutathione reductase (GR), CAT and the
other metalloenzymes. SOD, CAT, and GPx constitute a
mutually supportive team of defense against ROS. While
SOD lowers the steady-state level of O2-, catalase and
peroxidases do the same for H2O2.
Scheme 5. Mechanism of action of enzymatic antioxidant.
The antioxidant enzymesGPx, heme peroxidase, CAT,
and SODmetabolize oxidative toxic intermediates and
require micronutrient cofactors such as selenium, iron,
copper, zinc, and manganese for optimum catalytic
activity.95
The antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase
(SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx)
serve as the primary line of defence in destroying free
radicals. Glutathione plays several roles in the body e.g., it
improves the effectiveness of Vitamin C. SOD first reduces
(adds an electron to) the radical superoxide (O2-) to form
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and oxygen (O2). Catalase and
GPx then work simultaneously with the protein glutathione
to reduce hydrogen peroxide and ultimately produce water
(H2O). The oxidized glutathione is then reduced by another
antioxidant enzyme glutathione reductase. Together, they
repair oxidized DNA, degrade oxidized protein, and destroy
oxidized lipids (fat-like substances that are a constituent of
cell membranes). Various other enzymes act as a secondary
antioxidant defense mechanism to protect from further
damage.95
SOD is the antioxidant enzyme that catalyzed the
dismutation of the highly reactive superoxide anion to O2
and to the less reactive species H2O2. Peroxide can be
destroyed by CAT or GPx reactions.96-98 In humans, there
are three forms of SOD, cytosolic Cu/Zn-SOD,
mitochondrial Mn-SOD, and extracellular SOD (EC-
SOD).99-100 SOD destroys O2- by successive oxidation and
reduction of the transition metal ion at the active site in a
Ping Pong type mechanism with remarkably high reaction
rates.101 All types of SOD bind single charged anions such
as azide and fluoride, but distinct differences have been
noted in the susceptibilities of Fe, Mn or Cu/Zn-SODs.
Cu/Zn-SOD is competitively inhibited by N3- , CN-,102 and
by F-.103
SOD is found in our skin and it is essential in order for our
body to generate adequate amounts of skin-building cells
called fibroblasts. Among the common natural sources of
SOD are cabbage, Brussels sprouts, wheat grass, barley
grass and broccoli.
Catalase (CAT) is an enzyme responsible for the
degradation of hydrogen peroxide. It is a protective enzyme
present in nearly all animal cells. The functions of Human
erythrocyte catalase include catalyzing the decomposition of
H2O2 to water and oxygen. It is a tetramer of 4 polypeptide
chains. As with the chemical antioxidants, cells are
protected against oxidative stress by an interacting network
of antioxidant enzymes.104
Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) is an enzyme that is
responsible for protecting cells from damage due to free
radicals like hydrogen and lipid peroxides. The GPx
contains a single selenocysteine (Sec) residue in each of the
four identical subunits, which is essential for enzyme
activity.105 There are five GPx isoenzymes found in
mammals. The function of glutathione peroxidase, therefore,
is to reduce lipid hydroperoxides to their corresponding
alcohols and to reduce free H2O2 to water. Levels of GPx in
the body are closely linked with that of glutathione, the
master antioxidant. Glutathione (GSH for short) is a
tripeptide that not only protects the cells against ill effects of
pollution; it is also acts as the body’s immune system
boosters. It is present in high concentrations in the cells and
plays a pivotal role in maintaining them in reduced state lest
they suffer damage by oxidation by free radicals.
Combination of certain antioxidants like glutathione,
vitamin C and E, selenium and glutathione peroxidase are
very powerful in helping the body fight against the free
radicals. GSH ensures that the red blood cells remain intact
and protect the white blood cells (which are responsible for
immunity). Glutathione is found in vegetables and fruit, but
cooking will significantly reduce its potency. Taking it as a
supplement is a good idea.
Natural and synthetic antioxidants Section C-Review
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2017, 6(8), 365-375 DOI: 10.17628/ecb.2017.6.365-375
371
Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) is a family of enzymes
comprising a list of cytosolic, mitochondrial and
microsomal proteins which are capable of multiple reactions
with multitude of substrates, both endogenous or xenobiotic.
GSTs contribute to the phase II biotransformation of
xenobiotics by conjugating these compounds with reduced
glutathione to facilitate dissolution in aqueous cellular and
extra cellular media and from there, out of the body. GSTs
catalyse conjugation of reduced glutathione via the
sulfhydryl group, to electrophilic centers on a wide variety
of substrates. This activity is useful in the detoxification of
endogenous compounds such as peroxidised lipids as well as
metabolism of xenobiotics.
Glutathione reductase (GR) plays an indirect but
essential role in the prevention of oxidative damage within
the cell by helping to maintain appropriate levels of
intracellular glutathione (GSH). GSH, in conjunction with
the enzyme glutathione peroxidase (GP), is the acting
reductant responsible for minimizing harmful hydrogen
peroxide cellular levels. The regeneration of GSH is
catalyzed by GR. GR catalyzes the reduction of oxidized
glutathione (GSSG) to reduced glutathione, using β-
nicotinamide dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) as the
hydrogen donor. Molecules such as NADPH act as hydride
donors in a variety of enzymatic processes. NADPH has
been suggested to also act as an indirectly operating
antioxidant, given its role in the re-reduction of GSSG to
GSH and thus maintaining the antioxidative power of
glutathione.
Chemical pathways of natural antioxidants
After absorption, all antioxidants undergo certain
chemical reactions in order to protect other compounds from
oxidation. Most natural antioxidants have areas of high
electron density within themselves in order to prevent other
molecules from remaining as radicals for extended periods
of time.
Natural antioxidants donate electrons from two major
electronrich sources: hydroxyl groups and double bonds.
After donating electrons, natural antioxidants undergo
additional chemical reactions in order to facilitate their
breakdown. The first major method that several antioxidants
use in order to prevent oxidation in other compounds is to
donate electrons from their hydroxyl (OH) groups.106
Sources of natural antioxidants
Various antioxidants are supplied to human body
through diet, both vegetarian as well as non-vegetarian.
Vitamins C and E, β-carotene and coenzyme Q are the most
common antioxidants of diet, out of which, Vitamin E is
present in vegetable oils and found abundantly in wheat
germ. It is fat soluble vitamin, absorbed in the gut and
carried in the plasma bylipoproteins. Out if 8 natural state
isomeric forms of vitamin E, α-tocopherol is the most
common and potent isomeric form. Being lipid soluble,
vitamin E can effectively prevent lipid peroxidation of
plasma membrane.107-108
Plants (fruits, vegetables, medicinal herbs) may contain
awide variety of free radical scavenging molecules such as
phenolic compounds (phenolic acids, flavonoids, quinones,
coumarins, lignans, stilbenes, tannins etc.), nitrogen
compounds (alkaloids, amines, betalains etc.), vitamins,
terpenoids (including carotenoids) and some other
endogenous metabolites which are rich in antioxidant
activity.109-112
Synthetic antioxidants
Synthetic antioxidants are chemically synthesized
compounds since they do not occur in nature and are added
to food as preservatives to help prevent lipid oxidation. Due
to the inherent instability of natural antioxidants, several
synthetic antioxidants have been used to stabilize fats and
oils. Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and butylated
hydroxyanisole (BHA) were originally developed to protect
petroleum from oxidative gumming.113 However, these
compounds have been used as antioxidants in human foods
since 1954 and are perhaps the most common antioxidants
used in those foods today.114 BHT and BHA not only have
similar names, but similar structures and antioxidant activity
and are often used together in fats and oils. Despite the fact
that both BHT and BHA are included in the list of
substances that are "generally accepted as safe". Certain
chronic toxicity studies have implicated BHT as potential
tumor promoter when fed at high levels.115-116 In contrast,
BHA and BHT, may both be important inhibitors of
carcinogenesis, probably by way of their antioxidant
function.117 Thus, there have been some attempts to remove
these antioxidants, TBHQ (tert-butylhydroxyquinone) is
another synthetic antioxidant which is widely used in the
feed industry. Like BHT and BHA, TBHQ has a benzene
ring or phenol structure. Other examples of synthetic
antioxidants are propyl gallate (PG), dodecyl gallate (DG),
octylgallate (OG) and ethylene diaminetetraacetic acid
(EDTA).
Figure 2. Structures of some synthetic antioxidant
Natural and synthetic antioxidants Section C-Review
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2017, 6(8), 365-375 DOI: 10.17628/ecb.2017.6.365-375
372
Methods for assessing in vitro antioxidant activity
Due to the increasing interest in these biological
molecules for consumers, food scientists and the medical
fraternity, a quick and easy method for determining
antioxidant capacity would be most useful. The most
promising methods used to evaluate antioxidant properties
were summarized by Krishnaiah et al.118
Uses of antioxidants in technology
Epidemiological studies have been reported that many of
antioxidant compounds possess anti-inflammatory,
antiatherosclerotic, antitumor, antimutagenic,
anticarcinogenic, antibacterial and antiviral activities to
greater or lesser extent.119
In many cases, increased oxidative stress is a widely
associated in the development and progression of diabetes
and its complications which are usually accompanied by
increased production of free radicals or failure of
antioxidant defense.120 Though the intake of natural
antioxidants has been reported to reduce risk of cancer,
cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and other diseases
associated with aging, there is considerable controversy in
this area.121
Leukocytes and other phagocyte destroy bacteria,
parasites and virus-infected cells with NO, O2, H2O2, and
OCl-, which are powerful oxidants and protect humans from
infection. However, they also cause oxidative damage and
mutation to DNA and participate in the carcinogenic process
if remain unchecked.
It has been reported that antioxidants modulate the
pathophysiology of chronic inflammation up to some
extent.122 Moreover, experiments and studies infer that
antioxidants are needed to scavenge and prevent the
formation of ROS and RNS, out of them, some are free
radicals while some are not.123 There is growing evidence
that oxidative damage to sperm DNA is increased when
there is vitamin C insufficiency in diet.10 This strongly
suggests the protective role of antioxidant in our daily
diet.124
The antioxidants control gene behaviour and prevent
diseases. The antioxidant network is body's built-in
intelligence. It constantly monitors the health of each of the
trillions of cells in your body. Whenever a problem is
detected, antioxidants will turn on the appropriate gene,
which, in turn, activates the cells that it needs to solve the
problem. For example, antioxidants direct genes to alert the
immune system when there are invading viruses are detected.
The immune system then creates more white blood cells to
kill the viruses. But the process begins with the antioxidant
network. Because antioxidants can help regulate dangerous
genes, it opens up the possibility to treat diseases at their
root cause, by suppressing bad genes before they can do
harm, using antioxidants-the ultimate preventive medicine.
Food Preservatives
Antioxidants are used as food additives to help guard
against food deterioration.125 Consequently, packaging of
fresh fruits and vegetables contains an ~8% oxygen
atmosphere milk and milk products like cheese; meat, fish
and their products; spices and other dry foods like sugar,
honey, beverages, and chewing gum.126 Besides the direct
addition to food items, the antioxidants can be used to
preserve food by preventing the degradation of food
packaging during processing and storage. Thus, antioxidants
can be added to packaging materials like paper,
polyethylene, plastic and paperboard preventing the
oxidation of the material itself, or allowing the added
antioxidants to migrate into the packaged food inside and
prevent oxidation there.127-128
Antioxidants are an especially important class of
preservatives.129 These preservatives include natural
antioxidants such as ascorbic acid and tocopherols as well as
synthetic antioxidants such as, t-butylhydroquinone, BHA
and BHT.130-132 Antioxidant preservatives are also added to
fat-based cosmetics such as lipstick and moisturizers to
prevent rancidity.
Industrial uses
Antioxidants are frequently added to industrial products.
They are widely used to prevent the oxidative degradation of
polymers such as rubbers, plastics and adhesives that causes
a loss of strength and flexibility in these materials. Polymers
containing double bonds in their main chains, such as
natural rubber are especially susceptible to oxidation and
ozonolysis. Oxidation and UV degradation are also
frequently linked, mainly because UV radiation creates free
radicals by bond breakage. The free radicals then react with
oxygen to produce peroxy radicals which cause yet further
damage, often in a chain reaction.
Health benefits and risks
Due to the power of natural antioxidants to prevent the
generation of free radicals, it has been found that they are
particularly useful in preventing certain diseases. However,
though it is apparent that natural antioxidants have many
positive effects on health, it should also be taken into
consideration that they could also have harmful effects if
taken in excess.
Conclusions
In foods that may undergo oxidation, antioxidants,
function as an inhibitor of oxidation reactions through
various mechanisms. Nevertheless, some foods are deficient
in natural antioxidants and can easily deteriorate during
processing or in storage, necessitating the use of synthetic
antioxidants. However, most synthetic antioxidants are
effective at low concentrations, and the addition of higher
levels may lead to a pro-oxidant effect. Additionally, large
doses of synthetic antioxidants have been reported to impart
safety problems.
Natural and synthetic antioxidants Section C-Review
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2017, 6(8), 365-375 DOI: 10.17628/ecb.2017.6.365-375
373
Therefore, caution must be taken when selecting and
adding antioxidants in food systems. Meanwhile, the safety
of natural antioxidants should not be taken for granted as
antioxidants from natural sources are attracting more and
more attention.
The best way to get a variety of antioxidants in the diet is
to eat foods that represent all the colours of the rainbow.
Each color provides its own unique antioxidant effects.
Bright orange, deep yellow fruits and vegetables like carrots,
sweet potatoes, and apricots provide one type of antioxidant.
Red foods like tomatoes provide another. Green vegetables,
such as broccoli and cabbage, and blue or purple foods, like
blueberries, each have their own antioxidant packages.
References
1Matill, H. A., Ann. Rev. Biochem., 1947, 16, 177-192.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.16.070147.001141
2German, J. B., Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 1999, 459, 23-50.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4853-9_3
3Baillie, J. K., Thompson, A. A. R., Irving, J. B., Bates, M.
G. D., Sutherland, A. I., MacNee, W., Maxwell S. R. J.,
Webb, D. J., Q J Med., 2009, 102(5), 341-348.
https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcp026
4Bjelakovic, G., Nikolova, D., Gluud, L. L., Simonetti, R. G.,
Gluud, C., JAMA., 2007, 297(8), 842-57.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.8.842
5Angelo, J. St., Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 1996, 36(3), 175-
224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408399609527723
6Bandyopudya, U., Das, D., Banerjee, R. K., Curr. Sci.,
1999, 77(5), 658-666.
7Vajragupta, O., Boonchoong P., Berliner, L. J., Free Radic.
Res., 2004, 38, 303-314.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10715760310001643339
8Giles, G. I., Jacob, C., Biol. Chem., 2002, 383, 375-388.
https://doi.org/10.1515/BC.2002.042
9Hudson, B. J. F., Food Antioxidants, 1st ed., Elsevier
Science Publishing CO., INC., 1990.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0753-9
10Ames, N., Shigenaga M. K., Hagen, T. M., Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci., 1993, 90, 7915-7922.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.17.7915
11Inoue, M., Sato, E. F., Nishikawa, M., Park, A. M., Kira,
Y., Imada, I.,Utsumi, K., Curr. Med. Chem., 2003, 10,
2495-2505.
https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867033456477
12Capdevila, J., Parkhill, L., Chacos, N., Okita, R., Masters,
B. S., Estabrook, R. W., Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun., 1981, 101, 1357-1363.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(81)91597-7
13Valko, M., Izakovic, M., Mazur, M., Rhodes, C. J., Telser,
J., Mol. Cell Biochem., 2004, 266, 37-56.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MCBI.0000049134.69131.89
14Ames, B. N., Shigenaga, M. K., Gold, L. S., Environ
Health Perspect., 1993, 101, 35-44.
https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.93101s535
15Liu, R. H., Hotchkiss, J. H., Mutat. Res., 1995, 339, 73-89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1110(95)90004-7
16Geier, D. A., Kern, J. K., Garver, C. R., Neurochem Res.,
2009, 34, 386-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-
008-9782-x
17Geier, D. A., Kern, J. K., Garver, C. R., J. Neurol. Sci.,
2009, 280, 101-108.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2008.08.021
18Chipault, J. R., Antioxidants for Use in Foods, Vol II, ed.
by Lundberg W., Interscience, New York, 1962.
19Becker, E. M., Nissen, L. R., Skibsted, L. H., Eur. Food
Res. Technol., 2004, 219, 561-571.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-004-1012-4
20Halliwell, B., Free Rad. Res. Commun., 1990, 9, 1-32.
https://doi.org/10.3109/10715769009148569
21Halliwell, B., Adv. Pharmacol., 1997, 38, 3-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-3589(08)60976-X
22Scott, G., Antioxidants in Science, Technology, Medicine
and Nutrition. Albion Publishing, Chichester, 1997.
https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099938
23Tortora, G., Derrickson, B., Antioxidants Beyond the Hype
Medline Plus: Antioxidants "Introduction to the
Human Body, 2010.
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/antioxid
ants/
24MacDonald-Wicks, L. K., Wood, L. G., Garg, M. L., J. Sci.
Food Agric., 2006, 86, 2046-2056.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2603
25Buttriss, J. L., Hughes, J., Kelly, C. N. M., Stanner, S.,
Nutr. Bull., 2002, 27(4), 227-236.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-3010.2002.00267.x
26Brewer, M. S., Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 2011,
10(4), 221-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-
4337.2011.00156.x
27Dekkers, J.C., van Doornen, L. J. P., Kemper, H. C. G.,
Sports Med., 1996, 21, 213-238.
https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199621030-00005
28Podsedek, A., LWT, 2007, 40, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2005.07.023
29Gilgun-Sherki, Y., Melamed, E., Offen, D.,
Neuropharmacology, 2001, 40, 959-975.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3908(01)00019-3
30Machlin, L. J., Handbook of Vitamins, 2ed. Marcel Dekker,
New York, 1991.
31Yoshida, Y., Niki, E., Noguchi, N., Chem. Phys. Lipids,
2003, 123, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-
3084(02)00164-0
32Schneider, C., Mol. Nutr. Food Res., 2005, 49, 7-30.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200400049
33Servinova, E., Kagan, V., Han, D., Packer, L., Free Rad.
Biol. Med., 1991, 10, 263-275.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(91)90033-Y
34Suzuki, Y. J., Tsuchiya, M., Wassall, S. R., Choo, Y. M.,
Govil, G., Kagan, V. E., Packer, L., Biochemistry,
1993, 32, 10692-10699.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00091a020
35Burton, W., Ingold, K. U., Science, 1984, 224, 569-573.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6710156
36Burton, W., Ingold, K.U., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103,
6472-6477. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00411a035
37Wijtmans, M., Pratt, D. A., Valgimigli, L., DiLabio, G. A.,
Prattet, D. A., Pedulli, G. F., Porter, N. A., Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2003, 42(26), 4370-4373.
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200351881
38Niki, E., Saito, T., Kawakami, A., Kamiya, Y. J., Biol.
Chem., 1984, 259, 4177-4182.
39Doba, T., Burton, G. W., Ingold, K. U., Biochim. Biophys.
Acta., 1985, 835, 298-303.
Natural and synthetic antioxidants Section C-Review
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2017, 6(8), 365-375 DOI: 10.17628/ecb.2017.6.365-375
374
40Liebler, D. C., Kling, D. S., Reed, D. J., J. Biol. Chem.,
1986, 261, 12114-12119.
41Neuzil, J., Stocker, R., J. Biol. Chem., 1994, 269, 16712-
16719.
42Shi, H., Noguchi, N., Niki, E., Biol. Med., 1999, 27, 334-
346.
43Grusak, M. A., DellaPenna, D., Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.
Plant Mol. Biol., 1999, 50, 133-161.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.133
44Stewart, C. P., Guthrie, D., Lind’s treatise on scurvy,
Edinburgh, University Press, Edinburgh, 1953.
45Levine, M., N. Engl. J. Med., 1986, 314, 892-902.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198604033141407
46Englard, S., Seifter, S., Annu. Rev. Nutr., 1986, 6, 365-406.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nu.06.070186.002053
47Correa, P., Cancer Res., 1992, 52, 6735-6740.
48Byers, T., Guerrero, N., Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 1995, 62,
1385S-1392S.
49Jialal, I., Grundy, S. M., J. Clin. Inv., 1991, 87, 597-601.
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI115035
50Stokes, P. L., Melikian, V., Leeming, R. L., Portman-
Graham, H., Blair, J. A., Cooke, W. T., Am. J. Clin.
Nutr., 1975, 28, 126-9.
51Hallberg, D., Brune, M., Rossander-Hulthen, L., Ann. NY
Acad. Sci., 1987, 498, 324-332.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb23771.x
52Hallberg, L., Rossander, L., Persson, H., Svahn, E., Am. J.
Clin. Nutr., 1982, 36, 846-850.
53Hallberg, L., Scand. J. Gastroenterol. Suppl., 1987, 129,
73-79. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365528709095855
54Buettner, G. R., Radiat. Res., 1996, 145, 532-541.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3579271
55Haytowitz, D., J. Nutr., 1995, 125, 1952-1955.
56Krinsky, N. I., Johnson, E. J., Mol. Aspects Med., 2005, 26,
459-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2005.10.001
57Rodriguez-Amaya, D. B., Kimura, M., Godoy, H. T.,
Amaya-Farfan, J., J. Food Compos. Anal., 2008, 21,
445-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2008.04.001
58Zechmeister, L., Tuzson, P., Biochem. J., 1938, 32, 1305-
1311. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0321305
59Castenmiller, J. J., West C. E., Ann. Rev. Nutr., 1998, 18,
19-38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.18.1.19
60Failla, M. L., Thakkar, S. K., Kim, J. Y., J. Agric. Food
Chem., 2009, 57, 10922-10927.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf900415g
61Voutilainen, S., Nurmi, T., Mursu, J., Rissanen, T. H., Am.
J. Clin. Nutr., 2006, 83, 1265-1271.
62Agte, V., Tarwadi, K., Ophthalmic Res., 2010, 44, 166-172.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000316477
63Riccioni, G., Curr. Atheroscler. Rep., 2009, 11, 434-439.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-009-0065-z
64Di Mascio, P., Kaiser, S., Sies, H., Arch. Biochem.
Biophys., 1989, 274, 532-538.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(89)90467-0
65Levin, G., Mokady, S., Free Radic. Biol. Med., 1994, 17,
77-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(94)90009-4
66Levin, G., Yeshurun, M., Mokady, S., Nutr. Cancer, 1997,
27, 293-297.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01635589709514540
67Böhm, V., Puspitasari-Nienaber, N. L., Ferruzzi, M. G.,
Schwartz, S. J., J. Agric. Food Chem., 2002, 50, 221-
226. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010888q
68Aherne, S. A., O’Brien, N. M., Nutrition, 2002, 18, 75-81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(01)00695-5
69Robards, P., Prenzler, D., Tucker, G., Swatsitang, P.,
Glover, W., Food Chem., 1999, 66, 401-436.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00093-X
70Cook, N. C., Samman, S., Nutr. Biochem., 1996,7, 66-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-2863(95)00168-9
71Czeczot, H., Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 2000, 950(4), 3-13.
72Hollman, P. C. H., Hertog, M. G. L., Katan, M. B., Food
Chem., 1996, 57(1), 43-46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(96)00065-9
73Kuntz, S., Wenzel, U., Daniel, H., Eur. J. Nutr., 1999,
38(3), 133-142.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s003940050054
74Re, R., Pellegrini, N., Proteggente, A., Pannala, A., Yang,
M., Rice-Evans, C., Free Radic. Biol. Med., 1999,
26(9/10), 1231-1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-
5849(98)00315-3
75Vinson, A., Dabbagh, Y. A., Serry, M. M., Jang, J., J.
Agric. Food Chem., 1995,43, 2800-2802.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00059a005
76Shan, B., Cai, Y. Z., Sun, M., Corke, H., J. Agric. Food
Chem., 2005, 53(2), 7749-7759.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf051513y
77Engeseth, N. J., Geldof, N., J. Agric. Food Chem., 2002,
50, 3050-3055. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0114637
78Visioli, F., Bellomo, G., Galli, C., Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun., 1998, 247, 60-64.
https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1998.8735
79Hanasaki, Y., Ogawa, S., Fukui, S., Free Radic. Bio. Med.,
1994, 16, 845-850. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-
5849(94)90202-X
80Cos, P., Ying, L., Calomme, M., Hu, J. P., Cimanga, K.,
Poel, B. V., J. Nat. Prod., 1998, 61, 71-76.
https://doi.org/10.1021/np970237h
81Pannala, S., Chan, T. S., O’Brien, P. J., Rice-Evans, C. A.,
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2001, 282 1161-
1168. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.4705
82Haenen, G. R., Paquay, J. B., Korthouwer, R. E., Bast, A.,
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1997, 236, 591-593.
https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1997.7016
83Burda, S., Oleszek, W., J. Agric. Food Chem., 2001, 49,
2774-2779. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf001413m
84Tinggi, U., Environ. Health Prev. Med., 2008, 13, 102-108.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-007-0019-4
85Tapiero, H., Townsend, D. M., Tew, K. D., Biomed.
Pharm., 2003, 57, 134-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0753-3322(03)00035-0
86Klotz, L. O., Kroncke, K. D., Buchczyk, D. P., Sies, H., J.
Nutr., 2003, 133, 1448S-1451S.
87Valko, M., Rhodes, C. J., Moncol, J., Izakovic, M., Mazur,
M., Chem. Biol. Interact., 2006, 160, 1-40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2005.12.009
88Arner, E. S., Holmgren, A., Eur J. Biochem., 2000, 267,
6102-6109. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-
1327.2000.01701.x
89Das, K. C., Das, C. K., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,
2000, 277, 443-447.
https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2000.3689
Natural and synthetic antioxidants Section C-Review
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2017, 6(8), 365-375 DOI: 10.17628/ecb.2017.6.365-375
375
90Nordberg, J., Arner, E. S., Free Radic. Biol. Med., 2001,
31, 1287-1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-
5849(01)00724-9
91Gromer, S., Urig, S., Becker, K., Med. Res. Rev., 2004,24,
40-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.10051
92Steinbrenner, H., Alili, L., Bilgic, E., Sies, H., Brenneisen,
P., Free Radic. Biol. Med., 2006, 40, 1513-1523.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.12.022
93Steinbrenner, H., Bilgic, E., Alili, L., Sies, H., Brenneisen,
P., Free Radic. Res., 2006, 40, 936-43.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10715760600806248
94Worthington Enzyme Manual. Worthington Biochemical
Corp., 1993.
95Krishnamurthy, P., Wadhwani, A., Antioxidant enzymes
and human health, antioxidant enzyme, El-Missiry, M.
A. (ed.), InTech, 2012.
96Fridovich, I., Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1995, 64, 97-112.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.000525
97Teixeira, H. D., Schumacher, R. I., Meneghini, R., Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci., 1998, 95, 7872-7875.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.14.7872
98Sandalio, L. M., Lo´pez-Huertas, E., Bueno, P., del Rio, L.
A., Free Radic. Res., 1997, 26, 187-194.
https://doi.org/10.3109/10715769709097798
99Sandström, J., Nilsson, P., Karlsson, K., Marklund, S. L., J.
Biol. Chem., 1994, 269, 19163-19166.
100Sun, E., Xu, H., Liu, Q., Zhou, J., Zuo, P., Wang, J., Biol.
Trace. Elem. Res.,1995, 48, 231-238.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789405
101Meier, B., Scherk, C., Schmidt, M., Parak, F., Biochem. J.,
1998, 331, 403-407. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3310403
102Leone, M., Cupane, A., Militello, V., Stroppolo, M. E.,
Desideri, A., Biochemistry, 1998, 37, 4459-4464.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bi971878e
103Vance, C. K., Miller, A. F., Biochemistry, 1998, 37, 5518-
5527. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi972580r
104Reaume, A., Elliott, J., Hoffman, E., Kowall, N., Ferrante,
R., Siwek, D., Wilcox, H., Flood, D., Beal, M., Brown,
R., Scott, R., Snider, W., Nat., Genet., 1996, 13(1), 43-
77. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0596-43
105Speranza, M. J., Bagley, A. C., Lynch R. E., J. Biol.
Chem., 1993, 268, 19039-19043.
106Hossain, A., Asada, K., J. Biol. Chem., 1985, 260, 12920-
12926.
107Burton, G. W., Ingold, K.U., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1989,
570, 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-
6632.1989.tb14904.x
108Burton, G. W., Ingold, K. U., CRC Handbook of Free
Radicals and Antioxidants in Biomedicine, Vol. II,
Miguel, A., Quintanilha, A. T., Weber, H.,(Eds.), CRC
Press Inc. Boca Raton, FL., 1990.
109Cai, Y. Z., Sun, M., Corke, H., J. Agric. Food Chem.,
2003, 51(8), 2288-2294.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf030045u
110Cotelle, N., Bernier, J. L., Catteau, J. P., Pommery, J.,
Wallet, J. C., Gaydou, E. M., Free Rad. Bio. Med.,
1996, 20(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-
5849(95)02014-4
111Velioglu, Y. S., Gao, G., Mazza, L., Oomah, B. D., J.
Agric. Food Chem., 1998, 46(10), 4113-4117.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9801973
112Zheng, W., Wang, S. Y., J. Agric. Food Chem., 2001,
49(11), 5165-5170. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010697n
113Simec, M. G., Porter, K. M., Autoxidation in Foods and
Biological Systems, Plenum Press, New York, 1980.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9351-2
114Sherwin, E. R., J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 1976, 53, 430-436.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02605739
115Kaczmarski, M., Wojicicki, J., Samochowiee, L.,
Dutkiewicz, T., Sych, Z., Pharmazie, 1999, 54, 303-
306.
116Witschi, H. P., Toxicology, 1981, 21, 95-104.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-483X(81)90120-7
117Benson, A. M., Cha, Y., Bueding, E., Heine, H. S.,
Talalay, P., Cancer Res., 1979, 39, 2971-2977.
118Krishnaiah, D., Sarbatly, R., Nithyanandam, R., Food
bioprod. Process., 2011, 89, 217-233.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2010.04.008
119Sala, A., Recio, M. D., Giner, R. M., Manez, S., Tournier,
H., Schinella, G., Rios, J. L., J. Pharm. Pharmacol.,
2002, 54(3), 365-371.
https://doi.org/10.1211/0022357021778600
120Ceriello, A., Metabolism, 2000, 49(2 Suppl 1), 27-29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-0495(00)80082-7
121Klaus, A., Heribert, H., Ann. Rev. Plant Bio., 2004, 55,
373-399.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141
701
122Stamler, J. S., Singel, D. J., Loscalzo J., Science, 1992,
258, 1898-1902.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1281928
123Barry, H., Annu. Rev. Nut., 1996, 16, 33-50.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nu.16.070196.000341
124Uttara, B., Singh, A. V., Zamboni, P., Mahajan, R. T.,
Curr. Neuropharmacol., 2009, 7, 65-74.
https://doi.org/10.2174/157015909787602823
125Kader, A., Zagory, D., Kerbel, E., Crit. Rev. Food Sci.
Nutr., 1989, 28(1), 1-30.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398909527490
126Williamson, G., Day, A. J., Plumb, G. W., Couteau, D.,
Biochem. Soc. Trans., 2000, 28, 16-22.
https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0280016
127Morton, L. W., Caccetta, R. A., Puddey, I. B., Croft, K.
D., Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol., 2000, 27, 152-159.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1681.2000.03214.x
128Van Esch, G. J., Food Chem. Toxicol., 1986, 24, 1063-
1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-6915(86)90289-9
129Zallen, E., Hitchcock, M., Goertz, G., J. Am. Diet. Assoc.,
1975, 67(6), 552-557.
130Iverson, F., Cancer Lett., 1995, 93(1), 49-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3835(95)03787-W
131Robards, K., Kerr, A., Patsalides, E., Analyst, 1988,
113(2), 213-24. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9881300213
132Del Carlo, M., Di Sacchetti, G., Mattia, C., Compagnone,
D., Mastrocola, D., Liberatore, L., Cichelli, A., J Agric.
Food Chem., 2004, 52(13), 4072-4079.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf049806z
Received: 29.06.2017.
Accepted: 21.08.2017.
... Crude products (13,14) were crystallized from petroleum ether, then directly filtered through filter paper, and purified. The viscous products (15)(16)(17) were not subjected to any purification process. The melting points of the solids products were measured with Gallenkamp melting point instruments. ...
... Schiff bases (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) were synthesized according to the procedures described in the literature. [57,72] The Schiff bases (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) were obtained from the reaction of carbonyl compounds with primary amines. ...
... Schiff bases (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) were synthesized according to the procedures described in the literature. [57,72] The Schiff bases (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) were obtained from the reaction of carbonyl compounds with primary amines. For this, piperidin-4-ylmethanamine (7) was subjected to a condensation reaction with different aldehyde compounds (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde (8), 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (9), 3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde (10), 2-hydroxy-3methoxybenzaldehyde (11), 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde (12), and 2-hydroxybenzaldehyde (13) were used in the reactions. ...
Article
Full-text available
The use of Schiff bases especially in chemistry, medicine, pharmacy, and various industries has increased the importance of these compounds. Schiff bases and their derivatives show important bioactive properties in a wide range. Compounds containing phenol and its derivatives in their molecular structures have the potential to capture free radicals associated with various diseases. In this study, five new Schiff bases (13–17) having piperidine rings containing phenol groups, which have the potential to be used as antioxidants, were synthesized for the first time using microwave energy. The antioxidant effects of the compounds used in the syntheses (7–12) and the obtained new Schiff bases (13–17) and their inhibitory abilities against some metabolic enzymes including acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and human carbonic anhydrases I and II (hCAs I and hCAs II) were determined. In addition to the experimental findings, molecular docking studies of the compounds against human acetylcholinesterase were performed in order to provide ideas on structure‐based drug design (PDB ID: 4EY6). In light of the results obtained, it is thought that this study will be useful and guide in the food, medical, and pharmaceutical industries in the future.
... Examples, Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), Tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), Propyl gallate, Ethoxyquin [26] . ...
Article
Full-text available
Cold creams are widely used for their moisturizing and protective properties, providing a barrier against harsh environmental conditions. This study focuses on the formulation and evaluation of a cold cream infused with natural antioxidants to enhance skin health and provide additional anti-aging benefits. The antioxidants were derived from natural sources such as green tea extract, vitamin E, and essential oils known for their skin-protective properties. The cold cream was formulated using an oil-in-water emulsion system, incorporating ingredients like beeswax, almond oil, and glycerin for optimal skin hydration and emollience. The antioxidant blend was optimized for stability and compatibility within the formulation. Evaluation parameters included physicochemical properties such as pH, viscosity, spreadability, and stability under various storage conditions. Additionally, the formulation was assessed for its antioxidant activity using DPPH radical scavenging assays and skin compatibility through patch tests. The results demonstrated that the antioxidant-infused cold cream exhibited excellent stability, satisfactory moisturizing properties, and significant antioxidant activity. Skin compatibility studies revealed no signs of irritation or adverse effects, making it suitable for all skin types. This study highlights the potential of combining cosmetic and therapeutic benefits in skincare formulations, offering enhanced functionality for consumers.
... [4] Addi- [a] A. Ez-zoubi, N. Boutahiri, R. Sghyar (Figure 1), and exhibit powerful antioxidant capacity to stabilize fats and oils and are used as stabilizing additives in the food industry since 1954. [5] Despite certain chronic toxicity, BHT and BHA are included in the list of substances that are generally accepted as safe. Therefore, other attempts were subject to substitute BHT and BHA, exhibiting phenolic parts including TBHQ (tert-butylhydroxyquinone), and propyl galate ( Figure 1). ...
Article
Full-text available
Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) are synthetic phenolic antioxidants widely used as additives in the food industry. In this context, beta‐cyclodextrin (βCD) appears as a suitable encapsulating agent due to its bioavailability, water solubility, and high efficacy in incorporating phenolic compounds. The inclusion complexes (ICs) are prepared via the co‐precipitation method, followed by freeze‐drying. ¹H NMR and FTIR are used to confirm the formation of the ICs. Molecular modeling, including molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, is conducted to investigate the interactions involved in the ICs and their thermodynamic stability, respectively. Furthermore, the effect of the inclusion complexes on antioxidant efficacy is evaluated through the scavenging capacity of DPPH. The spectroscopic methods confirmed that BHT and BHA are successfully incorporated into βCD. Molecular docking revealed the formation of hydrogen bonds, with binding energies of −5.76 and −5.16 kcal mol⁻¹ for BHT/βCD and BHA/βCD, respectively. After performing MD simulations for 100 ns, both ICs demonstrated a high degree of stability over time. The DPPH assay showed an increase in antioxidant ability for BHT (IC50 decreased from 68.82 to 53.32 µg mL⁻¹) but a decrease in efficiency for BHA (IC50 increased from 451.25 to 598.36 µg mL⁻¹).
... Structures of some synthetic antioxidants[87]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Oxidative stress, resulting from an imbalance between free radicals and antioxidants, profoundly influences physiological processes and disease pathogenesis. Free radicals, possessing unpaired electrons, exhibit transient stability but high reactivity, originating from endogenous metabolic processes and exogenous sources like environmental toxins. While essential at low levels, their accumulation leads to oxidative stress, contributing to cellular damage and disease progression. Antioxidants, including enzymatic (e.g., superoxide dismutase, catalase) and non-enzymatic (e.g., glutathione, vitamins C and E) varieties, play pivotal roles in neutralizing free radicals and mitigating oxidative damage. Natural antioxidants, particularly phenolic compounds abundant in plant-based foods, offer diverse health benefits, including anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and antimicrobial properties. Synthetic antioxidants like BHA and BHT are also utilized in food preservation. This review provides insights into the sources, types, and physiological impacts of free radicals, oxidative stress, and antioxidants. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for developing therapeutic interventions against oxidative stress-related disorders and promoting overall health.
... Molecules called antioxidants can stop or reduce the oxidation of substances that are prone to oxidation-compounds known as antioxidants shield cells from the damaging effects of free radicals [3]. The body's metabolism and other outside variables may produce these free radicals. ...
Article
Full-text available
Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) is a type of vegetable popular in various parts of the world. Okra has bioactive components such as flavonoids, polyphenols, and saponins that have the potential as antioxidants and anti-inflammatories [1]. Based on Utami (2018), purple okra has a higher phenol content and quercetin levels (2,034 ± 70.474 mg GAE 100 g-1 and 3,965 ± 0.449 mg 100 g-1) compared to green okra (1,807 ± 60.332 mg GAE 100 g-1 and 1,849 ± 0.449 mg 100 g-1) [2]. Not only okra pods, but okra mucilage is also proven to contain bioactive components that have health benefits for the human body. Bioactive compounds in purple okra mucilage, can be utilized in functional food. This study determined the effect of mucilage addition on the antioxidant properties of purple okra pudding. The addition of mucilage significantly (p<0.001) affected the antioxidant activity tested using the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) method. Purple okra pudding with 20% mucilage has the highest antioxidant activity, which is 59.02% free radical inhibition that is equivalent with 24.95 mg vitamin C g⁻¹ extract, and an IC50 value of 351.23. However, the addition of mucilage did not have a significant effect on total flavonoids and phenol content (p>0.05).
... Despite its effectiveness, rodent renal cystic disease has been associated with NDGA (nordihydroguaiaretic acid). Still, with proper use and regulation, synthetic antioxidants can be a safe and reliable tool in food preservation (Atta et al., 2017;Shalini Kapoor and Sivakumar Joghi Thatha, 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: There is great promise for improving nutrition and health thanks to phytonutrients' antioxidant qualities and health advantages. Their capacity to combat oxidative stress and associated illnesses emphasizes the importance of precisely evaluating their antioxidant characteristics. Objective: This study concludes by providing a comprehensive and critical critique of the current approaches to measure the antioxidant activity of phytonutrients. It dives into the fundamentals, benefits, drawbacks, and most recent developments of commonly used antioxidant assays, giving the reader a comprehensive grasp of the topic. This recapitulation of the review's goal in the end reinforces the reader's primary takeaway. Methods: Research on several antioxidant tests, such as FRAP, ORAC, DPPH, and ABTS, is consolidated in this review. It looks at each assay's performance traits, technological advances, and techniques. The review also assesses the incorporation of many assays to thoroughly examine phytonutrient potency and its uses in the food industry and nutritional science. Results: The review shows how antioxidant tests have advanced significantly, improving sensitivity, accuracy, and physiological relevance. It demonstrates how these tests can be used practically to guarantee food quality, create supplements, and offer nutritional advice. The paper also lists the difficulties today, including the intricacy of antioxidant mechanisms, test variability, and the requirement for assay standardization. The practical value of the research is emphasized by highlighting the significance of antioxidant tests for quality assurance, adulteration detection, and shelf life extension in the food business. Discussion: Scientists, doctors, and business experts interested in evaluating and applying phytonutrients will find this review helpful. It emphasizes how crucial it is to improve antioxidant testing to ascertain the possible health advantages and therapeutic uses of phytonutrients. The review highlights the need for increased test sensitivity, accuracy, and relevance while discussing the benefits and drawbacks of the available techniques. It draws attention to the importance of strong and trustworthy antioxidant tests to maximize the use of phytonutrients in food quality control and pharmaceutical research. Prospects: Future directions seek to address the challenges discovered through the development of multidisciplinary research and testing technologies. Novel approaches will advance our knowledge of phytonutrient potency and aid in developing medicines and nutraceuticals. This study highlights the significance of trustworthy assays for understanding and utilizing phytonutrients, providing academics and professionals in the business with vital insights.
Article
With rising living standards, the demand for health and nutrition has increased, sparking interest in food antioxidants. Known for neutralizing free radicals, antioxidants protect cells from oxidative damage, potentially aiding in disease prevention and anti-aging. In the food industry, they also enhance preservation and quality. Thus, studying food antioxidant mechanisms, detection methods, and applications holds theoretical and practical value. This review mainly discusses the mechanisms, detection methods, and applications of food antioxidants in nutrition. Firstly, the main research status and development trends of food antioxidants are described. Then, the action mechanisms of food antioxidants are introduced. Food antioxidants can effectively remove free radicals and prevent free radicals from causing damage to human cells, thus delaying aging and preventing disease. Secondly, the methods of detecting food antioxidants are discussed, including liquid chromatography, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, gas chromatography, and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. These methods can be used to analyze antioxidant components in various samples of foods, drugs, plants, etc. Finally, the research progress of plant antioxidants is discussed, including the applications of a variety of highly effective antioxidant components extracted from different plants. This review provides the theoretical basis and application reference for the research of food antioxidants.
Article
Full-text available
Hypericum gaitii Haines, belonging to the family Hypericaceae is an important threatened medicinal plant of India. This plant possess immense medicinal properties due to the presence of essential oil and various phytochemicals. Till date there is a lack of scientific reports on phytochemical analysis and pharmacological studies of both leaf essential oil and extracts of H. gaitii. Thus, this study presents phytochemical analysis and pharmacological activities of this important medicinal plant. The phytochemical profiling of H. gaitii leaf was estimated by the spectrophotometry method. This study has revealed that phenolics content (199.23 mg GAE/ g DW) was major content, followed by tannins (141.57 mg TAE/g DW), saponins (63.92 mg/g DW), alkaloids (56.45 mg/g DW), and flavonoids (46.37 mg/g DW). The chemical composition of leaf essential oil of H. gaitii was evaluated by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. It was found that α-Pinene (62.1%) as major compound, followed by Caryophyllene (5.17%), β-Pinene (5.45%), β-myrcene (3.14%), Caryophyllene oxide (2.16%), Geranyl acetate (1.77%), and β-eudesmol (1.10%). The pharmaceutical activities, including antioxidant, antiproliferative, antidiabetic, and antimicrobial activities of essential oil and different extracts of H. gaitii leaf, were evaluated. H. gaitii methanol extract showed higher antioxidant activity (DPPH IC50 32.43 ug/mL; ABTS IC50 47.33 ug/mL) in comparison to all tested extracts as well as essential oil. Essential oil showed more antiproliferative activity against different cell lines, i.e., PC3 (IC50 41.68 ug/mL), MCF7 (IC50 39.82 ug/mL), and MDA MB 231 (IC50 56.23 ug/mL), in comparison to other samples. Similarly, the antidiabetic activity of essential oil (IC50 67.75 ug/mL) was also higher among all samples. H. gaitii methanol extract showed potential antimicrobial activity against different pathogenic bacteria. This study could be helpful to exploit the pharmaceutical potential of H. gaitii with the discovery of new bioactive molecules.
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to evaluate the antioxidant and antimicrobial effects of garden cress seeds at various percentages (2, 5, and 7%) on the quality of beef burgers stored at 4 °C for 7, 14, and 21 days. The results showed that increasing the garden cress seeds percentage in the beef burger resulted in lower moisture content and higher ash content. Gas chromatography analysis revealed that cress seeds contained high levels of benzoic acid compounds (45.74%). The antioxidant percentages were 89.87% for the ABTS and 82.09% for the DPPH test. The peroxide values and aerobic counts in beef burgers increased significantly (p < 0.05) over time during storage but, significantly decreased (p < 0.05) with increasing the percentage of garden cress seeds. Sensory evaluation of beef burgers indicated a notable decline (p < 0.05) in overall acceptability with higher percentages of garden cress seeds. The texture, aroma, shape, and overall acceptability differed significantly between the control sample and those fortified with garden cress seeds. In conclusion, adding garden cress seeds powder in a 2%–7% ratio to beef burgers as a natural antioxidant can prolong their shelf life without affecting their taste or quality.
Article
Full-text available
This article is motivated by an interest in comparing inferences made when using a Bayesian or frequentist statistical approach. The article addresses the study of one-sided superiority and noninferiority Bayesian tests. These tests are stated in terms of the posterior probability that the null hypothesis is true for the binomial distribution and in terms of one-sided credible limits. We restrict our considerations to conjugate beta priors with integer parameters. Under this assumption, the posterior probabilities of tested hypotheses can be transformed into the frequentist probabilities of Bernoulli trials with an adjusted number of events and population sizes. The method resembles a standard frequentist problem formulation. By using an appropriate choice of prior parameters, the posterior probabilities of the null hypothesis can be made smaller or larger than the p-values of frequentist tests.
Book
Antioxidants are present naturally in virtually all food commodities, providing them with a valuable degree of protection against oxidative attack. When food commodities are subjected to processing, such natural antioxidants are often depleted, whether physically, from the nature of the process itself, or by chemical degradation. In conse­ quence, processed food products usually keep less well than do the commodities from which they originated. Ideally, food producers would like them to keep better. This objective can often be achieved by blending natural products rich in antioxidants with processed foods, or by using well recognised antioxidants as food additives. In order to understand their action, and hence to apply antioxidants intelligently in food product formulation, some knowledge of the mechanisms by which they function is necessary. This is complex and of antioxidative may rely on one or more of several alternative forms intervention. Accordingly, the various mechanisms that may be relevant are discussed in Chapter 1, in each case including the 'intervention' mechanism. When present in, or added to, foods antioxidants are functional in very small quantities, typically, perhaps, at levels of 0·01 % or less.
Book
The material presented in this book deals with basic mechanisms of free radical reactions in autoxidation processes and anitoxidant suppression of autoxidation of foods, biochemical models and biologi­ cal systems. Autoxidation in foods and corresponding biological effects are usually approached separately although recent mechanistic developments in the biochemistry and free radical chemistry of per­ oxides and their precursors tend to bring these two fields closer. Apparent ability of antioxidants in diets to reduce the inci­ dence of cancer has resulted in scrutiny of autoxidized products and their precursors as possibly toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic agents. Mechanisms of any of these effects have been barely ad­ dressed. Yet we know now that free radicals, as esoteric as they were only a few decades ago, are being discovered in foods, biochem­ ical and biological systems and do play a role in the above-mentioned causalities. The purpose of the Workshop and the resulting book was to give a unifying approach towards study of beneficial and deleterious effects of autoxidation, based on rigorous scientific considerations. It is our hope that the material presented in this book will not only provide a review of the "state of the art" of autoxidation and anti­ oxidants, but also reflect the interaction which occurred during the Workshop between workers using model sytems, and food and biological systems.
Article
Phenolic compounds occur in all fruits as a diverse group of secondary metabolites. Hence, they are a component of the human diet although data for dietary intakes and metabolic fate are limited. Their role in oxidation processes, as either antioxidants or substrates in browning reactions, is examined. They are characterised by high chemical reactivity and this complicates their analysis.
Article
Flavonoids are a group of polyphenolic compounds, diverse in chemical structure and characteristics, found ubiquitously in plants. Therefore, flavonoids are part of the human diet. Over 4,000 different flavonoids have been identified within the major flavonoid classes which include flavonols, flavones, flavanones, catechins, anthocyanidins, isoflavones, dihydroflavonols, and chalcones. Flavonoids are absorbed from the gastrointestinal tracts of humans and animals and are excreted either unchanged or as flavonoid metabolites in the urine and feces. Flavonoids are potent antioxidants, free radical scavengers, and metal chelators and inhibit lipid peroxidation. The structural requirements for the antioxidant and free radical scavenging functions of flavonoids include a hydroxyl group in carbon position three, a double bond between carbon positions two and three, a carbonyl group in carbon position four, and polyhydroxylation of the A and B aromatic rings. Epidemiological studies show an inverse correlation between dietary flavonoid intake and mortality from coronary heart disease (CHD) which is explained in part by the inhibition of low density lipoprotein oxidation and reduced platelet aggregability. Dietary intake of flavonoids range between 23 mg/day estimated in The Netherlands and 170 mg/day estimated in the USA. Major dietary sources of flavonoids determined from studies and analyses conducted in The Netherlands include tea, onions, apples, and red wine. More research is needed for further elucidation of the mechanisms of flavonoid absorption, metabolism, biochemical action, and association with CHD.
Article
Isomerization of carotenoids, which is often encountered in food processing under the influence of temperature and light, may play a role in the observed protective effects of this group of secondary plant products. Investigation of in vitro antioxidant activity of prominent carotenoid geometrical isomers was undertaken in light of recent reports illustrating a large percentage of carotenoid (Z)-isomers in biological fluids and tissues. alpha-Carotene, beta-carotene, lycopene, and zeaxanthin were isolated from foods or supplements and subsequently photoisomerized with iodine as a catalyst. Major Z-isomers of each carotenoid were fractionated by semipreparative C-30 HPLC. In vitro antioxidant activity of all isomers collected was measured photometrically using the Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assay. TEAC values of 17 geometrical isomers investigated ranged from 0.5 to 3.1 mmol/L. Three unidentified (Z)-isomers of lycopene showed the highest antioxidant activity, being significantly higher than the result for (all-E)-lycopene, which had approximately two times the activity of (all-E)-beta-carotene. On the other hand, (92)-zeaxanthin had a more than 80% lower TEAC value compared to that of (all-E)-lycopene. These results allow for the in vivo relevance of (Z)-isomers of carotenoids to be considered.
Article
This article updates the Brazilian database on food carotenoids. Emphasis is on carotenoids that have been demonstrated important to human health: α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene, lutein and zeaxanthin. The sampling and sample preparation strategies and the analytical methodology are presented. Possible sources of analytical errors, as well as the measures taken to avoid them, are discussed. Compositional variation due to such factors as variety/cultivar, stage of maturity, part of the plant utilized, climate or season and production technique are demonstrated. The effects of post-harvest handling, preparation, processing and storage of food on the carotenoid composition are also discussed. The importance of biodiversity is manifested by the variety of carotenoid sources and the higher levels of carotenoids in native, uncultivated or semi-cultivated fruits and vegetables in comparison to commercially produced crops.
Article
In the present in vitro study we compared the antioxidative efficiency of the 9-cis to that of the all-trans β-carotene. The 9-cis isomer was isolated from the alga Dunaliella bardawil. The experimental system consisted of 80 mM methyl linoleate, 4 mM azo-bis-2,2′-dimethylvaleronitrile (AMVN) as a free generating agent, and 200 μM β-carotene (synthetic all-rans, 9-cis or a mixture of the 9-cis and all-rans isomers, having a ration of 2.3). During the incubation at 37°C the mixtures were analyzed for methyl linoleate hydroperoxides, total β-carotene concentration, and its isometric composition. The content of 9-cis β-carotene in the various systems as negatively correlated to the level of the hydroperoxides accumulated, and positively related to the residual β-carotene amount. The HPLC analysis of the system containing both isomers revealed a continuous decrease in the 9-cis to all-trans isomer ratio. The results suggest that the 9-cis β-carotene has a higher antioxidant potency than that of the all-trans isomer and, therefore, it protects the methyl linoleate, as well as the all-rans isomer, from oxidation. This isomeric difference might be explained by the higher reactivity of cis, compared to trans, bonds.
Article
Some researchers suggest that two-thirds of the world's plant species have medicinal value; in particular, many medicinal plants have great antioxidant potential. Antioxidants reduce the oxidative stress in cells and are therefore useful in the treatment of many human diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases and inflammatory diseases. This paper reviews the antioxidant potential of extracts from the stems, roots, bark, leaves, fruits and seeds of several important medicinal species. Synthetic antioxidants such as butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and butylated hydroxylanisole (BHA) are currently used as food additives, and many plant species have similar antioxidant potentials as these synthetics. These species include Diospyros abyssinica, Pistacia lentiscus, Geranium sanguineum L., Sargentodoxa cuneata Rehd. Et Wils, Polyalthia cerasoides (Roxb.) Bedd, Crataeva nurvala Buch-Ham., Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn, Teucrium polium L., Dracocephalum moldavica L., Urtica dioica L., Ficus microcarpa L. fil., Bidens pilosa Linn. Radiata, Leea indica, the Lamiaceae species, Uncaria tomentosa (Willd.) DC, Salvia officinalis L., Momordica Charantia L., Rheum ribes L., and Pelargonium endlicherianum. The literature reveals that these natural antioxidants represent a potentially side effect-free alternative to synthetic antioxidants in the food processing industry and for use in preventive medicine.