ChapterPDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Increasing the uptake of nature-based solutions (NBS) requires greater collaboration amongst different policy areas, sectors and stakeholders. This chapter showcases examples of multi-stakeholder partnerships, private sector leadership, and citizen engagement, which have supported the development or implementation of NBS in urban areas. It aims to complement the theoretical contributions of the previous chapters of this book by providing real-world insights into how such partnerships can promote climate resilience and nature conservation, as well as the lessons that can be learned from them. It thereby hopes to spark ideas for future research and the development of collaborative, multi-stakeholder partnerships for NBS.
Content may be subject to copyright.
275© The Author(s) 2017
N. Kabisch et al. (eds.), Naturebased Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation
in Urban Areas, Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions,
Chapter 16
Partnerships forNature-Based Solutions
inUrban Areas– Showcasing Successful
Chantal vanHam andHelenKlimmek
This chapter is written from IUCNs perspective as a global membership organisation uniquely com-
posed of state and government agencies, NGOs, scientic institutions and business associations.
C. vanHam (*) • H. Klimmek
IUCN European Regional Ofce, Brussels, Belgium
Abstract Increasing the uptake of nature-based solutions (NBS) requires greater
collaboration amongst different policy areas, sectors and stakeholders. This chapter
showcases examples of multi-stakeholder partnerships, private sector leadership,
and citizen engagement, which have supported the development or implementation
of NBS in urban areas. It aims to complement the theoretical contributions of the
previous chapters of this book by providing real-world insights into how such part-
nerships can promote climate resilience and nature conservation, as well as the les-
sons that can be learned from them. It thereby hopes to spark ideas for future research
and the development of collaborative, multi-stakeholder partnerships for NBS.
Keywords Multidisciplinary partnerships • natural capital • citizen engagement •
nature-based solutions
16.1 Introduction
Recent research (Kabisch etal. 2016) has shown that there is a need to forge new
networks and develop trans-disciplinary and inclusive partnerships and governance
approaches in order to foster the uptake of nature-based solutions (NBS) in response
to climate-related challenges. Producing stronger evidence on NBS for climate
change adaptation and mitigation, and raising awareness of their benets to society,
are also key priorities for policy and practice.
Partnerships are collaborative arrangements which are important for implement-
ing sustainability agendas due to two distinct and dening characteristics: (a) They
can create and catalyse synergies between different parts of society by pooling
together resources and skills, knowledge, institutional and governance capacities
and (b) they are exible and versatile in the roles they adopt, as partners match and
complement their competencies and capacities to undertake a task or aim to achieve
a common target (Frantzeskaki etal. 2014).
For IUCN, partnerships are a key driving force for successful conservation action.
The socio-economic and environmental challenges confronting society today are
complex and far from clear-cut. Bringing together diverse stakeholders such as gov-
ernments, NGOs, scientists, businesses, local communities and indigenous peoples
groups, can help to address these challenges in a comprehensive and inclusive way.
The complexity of urban environments underlines the importance of multi-
disciplinary and multi-scale partnerships in cities. Cities represent a new class of
ecosystems shaped by the dynamic interactions between ecological and social sys-
tems (CBD 2012). Urban citizens depend on ecosystems both within and beyond
cities for a wide variety of goods and services (e.g. food, water, energy, climate
regulation), and while cities are increasingly recognised for their role in conserva-
tion (CBD 2012), urbanisation also presents a major environmental challenge, for
example by driving habitat conversion (McDonald etal. 2013).
Nature offers great untapped potential for improving the quality of life of urban
citizens and nding solutions to challenges such as rising temperatures (the urban
heat island effect) or ooding (CBD 2012). The challenge lies in developing and
adopting urban planning and management approaches that ensure the delivery of
regulating, provisioning, supporting, and cultural ecosystem services, while also
promoting the sustainable use of resources.
Ideally, stakeholders from different policy areas and sectors should come together to
develop holistic approaches to managing natural capital– the world’s stocks of natural
assets which includes geology, soil, air, water and all living things. In reality however,
collaboration between sectors and stakeholders is often hindered by a lack of exchange
and cooperation, presenting a barrier to effective policymaking (Science for Environment
Policy 2016) and the implementation of successful conservation initiatives.
Multidisciplinary and cross-cutting concepts such as NBS have the potential to
facilitate cooperation between sectors and contribute to a more holistic approach to
tackling socio-economic and environmental challenges. From IUCNs perspective,
NBS are interventions which use nature, and the ecosystem services they provide,
to address societal challenges such as climate change. Well-functioning ecosystems
that deliver services needed by society are at the core of these types of solutions,
which include, for instance, the creation or restoration of large ecosystems; invest-
ing in natural infrastructure and watershed management for water, food and energy
security and climate change adaptation; ecosystem-based mitigation oriented solu-
tions, such as the conservation and sustainable management of forests; and using
ecologically engineered solutions, such as intertidal habitats or oyster reefs to pro-
tect shorelines and reduce sea-level rise impact and coastal inundation.
The aim of this chapter is to prole a broad range of partnerships led by the pri-
vate sector, local communities and local/regional governments, which have restored,
conserved and managed ecosystems to the benet of people and the environment.
The following sections include reections on key outcomes and lessons that can be
C. vanHam and H. Klimmek
learned from each of these examples, which can provide the basis for further
research into the implementation of NBS.The examples contained in this chapter
were sourced through IUCNs global knowledge network and connections, supple-
mented by existing literature, and were chosen based on their suitability for high-
lighting success factors of, and challenges to partnerships for NBS.The examples
were also selected to reect diversity in terms of the partners involved and their
geographical location.
16.2 The Private Sector– AValuable Partner
forImplementing NBS
The private sector (i.e. for-prot businesses) is a key partner to engage with in the
process of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets. While the private sector
can have negative impacts on biodiversity, it also has the potential to offer innova-
tive solutions to urban challenges. Businesses can provide insights and perspectives
which are complementary to those from governments and civil society. In particular,
their knowledge of markets, management experience, and ability to harness
advanced research and development to deliver solutions, can be valuable assets in
the context of implementing NBS (IUCN 2012a).
Many businesses are increasingly realising that their future depends (directly or
indirectly) on natural resources and that solely relying on man-made infrastructure is
not enough (Ozment etal. 2015). Man-made storm surge barriers, for example, can
help protect harbours, but can also seriously increase surge levels in surrounding areas.
River ecosystems throughout Europe have been severely impacted by engineering
projects for ood protection, navigation, water supply and hydroelectricity; it is esti-
mated that less than 20% of Europe’s rivers and oodplains are in their natural state
(RESTORE 2016). A combination of measures is needed to tackle ood and climate
change related challenges effectively. This must include land-use management and
nature-based measures which embrace natural systems as a means of enhancing our
well-being and reducing risk (Munich RE 2015). Growing oyster reefs, for example,
can help to reduce coastal erosion and protect businesses from storm surges, while
also ltering contaminated seawater and supporting local sheries (RESTORE 2016).
The importance and value of engaging with the private sector is aptly demon-
strated in relation to climate change. According to a survey conducted by the
Economist Intelligence Unit in 2014, 90% of business leaders believe that they have
a role in building resilience and preparing cities for the impact of climate change
(Kongrukgreatiyos 2014). This has already translated into action– in 2014, the pri-
vate sector was the largest source of climate nance, devoting $243 billion to
climate- related investments (Buchner etal. 2015). Partnerships between businesses,
cities, civil society organisations, scientists and other urban stakeholders are crucial
to showcasing the value of natural capital as the foundation for economic prosperity
and human well-being, and help to bring about changes in business practices and
leverage contributions from the private sector.
16 Partnerships forNature-Based Solutions inUrban Areas– Showcasing...
During the Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change (COP of UNFCCC) in Paris in 2015, the World
Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) launched Natural
Infrastructure for Business– an online platform to increase awareness of business
opportunities for investing in ecosystems, or natural infrastructure, and scale up
action. The ultimate objective of the initiative is that by 2020 companies systemati-
cally assess natural infrastructure options when investing in new sites or projects,
thereby contributing to the protection, restoration and creation of new ecosystems.
The online platform contains case studies from different industries leveraging vari-
ous ecosystem services and decision-making tools, including a cost-benet analysis
tool. Some of these case studies are highlighted below.
16.2.1 Examples ofPrivate Sector Led Partnerships forNBS Volkswagen Restores Nature toSecure Reliable Water Supply
One example from the Natural Infrastructure for Business database is the Volkswagen
initiative in the Puebla-Tlaxcala Valley in Mexico (WBCSD 2010). This project was
initiated after years of deforestation from illegal logging and livestock farming, had
led to increased water runoff and a reduction in capture and storage in the ground-
water table. Realising that a reliable water supply was critical to ensuring the future
of the company’s production efforts, Volkswagen de Mexico, in partnership with the
Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas and the Secretary of the
Environment for Mexico, invested in a project to plant trees, dig pits, and earthen
banks to enable more than 1,300,000 cubic meters of additional water per year to be
fed into the ground reserves in the source region, which is signicantly more ground-
water than Volkswagen in México itself consumes every year (WBCSD 2010). In
the long term, these measures will help to ensure the provision of fresh water for the
growing city of Puebla, while securing a reliable water supply for the stability of the
company’s production plant in the region (WBCSD 2010). The additional biomass
will also help sequester carbon dioxide and improve living conditions for the native
fauna (WBCSD 2010), demonstrating the multiple benets restoration efforts can
bring to both people and the natural environment. Rehabilitation ofQuarries Provides Multiple Benets forNature,
People andBusiness
Another example showcased in the WBCSD Natural Infrastructure for Business
platform (Rushworth and Warau 2015) is a project in Bellegarde in the South of
France, initiated by LafargeHolcim, a global leader in the building materials indus-
try. This project focuses on stormwater management and ood prevention through
targeted quarry rehabilitation and management programmes that provide stormwater
C. vanHam and H. Klimmek
catchments and create wetland habitats (Rushworth and Warau 2015). The sand and
gravel quarry of Bellegarde has been in operation since 1970 and LafargeHolcim has
worked with the local municipality to develop ood prevention infrastructure and
create wetlands. The extracted quarry areas have been converted into stormwater
reservoirs with a capacity of 2.5 million cubic meters, reducing the risk of ooding
for local communities. Rehabilitation measures included the creation of shoreline
areas and gently sloped riverbanks with varied contours, which have created diverse
natural habitats such as ponds, resting places, and small islands that are favourable
to many species. Research has shown that wetlands created from quarries in France
have become a habitat for 132 species of birds (more than 48 percent of the French
avifauna), 17% of the ora (1001 vascular plant species), and 63% of dragonies
found in France. Quarries have also become important refuge areas for many pro-
tected species. In addition to improving biodiversity in the area, the measures have
also resulted in water quality and recreational benets. Provided that there is access
to sufcient land area to accommodate quarrying activities, the approach adopted by
LafargeHolcim could be replicated in other areas and result in similar benets.
16.2.2 Reections andLessons Learned
These examples demonstrate the potential of NBS to address multiple needs; spe-
cic interventions in, for example, reed beds, wetlands and forests can provide
signicant benets to species’ populations, while also improving water quality
and quantity. Sharing these types of best practices via an online platform, such as
the WBCSD Natural Infrastructure for Business platform, can help to promote
investments in natural infrastructure, and provide the basis for developing similar
initiatives, adapted to local contexts.
Based on IUCNs experience, a key criterion for successful partnerships with the
business sector is a shared understanding of landscape, land use, ecosystem relation-
ships, benets of investment in natural capital, key policies, development strategies and
legal frameworks, and rights and responsibilities over resources. Acting in partnership
also means being clear on the values of different stakeholders, the needs of the natural
environment and local communities. Business actors may for example want to know the
quantied impacts of water shortage on their business operations, whereas conservation
actors may want to assess the actual impacts of water pollution on biodiversity. These
aspects should be kept in mind when developing partnerships with the private sector.
16.3 Citizen Participation andLeadership
From IUCN’s perspective, recognising and respecting the rights of people who
live close to and rely on nature is a central component of effective and inclusive
conservation action.
16 Partnerships forNature-Based Solutions inUrban Areas– Showcasing...
Though citizen participation in environmental decision-making can bring its own
sets of challenges (Irvin and Stansbury 2004), it can also support sustainable devel-
opment (Abbott 2013) and is often promoted by governments based on the assump-
tion that citizen participation can help make governance more democratic and
effective (Irvin etal. 2004). There are numerous examples from around the world
where people have come together to restore the landscape’s ecological functions
and enhance well-being within and around cities, for example by growing organic
food, building nature-friendly spaces or restoring rivers and creeks (Herzog 2013;
URBES 2014a). Such examples illustrate the potential of citizens to bring about
meaningful social and environmental change.
While policymakers and urban planners recognise the value of engaging with
local communities, engaging citizens in urban planning and management decisions
is not always easy. Municipality-promoted participation processes require political
support and backing, as well as mechanisms and policies that promote inclusive
governance practices (Greensurge 2015). Funding is also needed to ensure high
participation levels and sound participatory engagement processes.
The section below highlights instances of citizen leadership which have helped
to integrate local concerns into environmental management plans and foster the
delivery of a range of ecosystem services and benets.
16.3.1 Examples ofPartnerships Building onCitizen
Participation The Miyun Watershed (Beijing)– Illustrating theValue
ofEngaging Local Stakeholders
The Miyun watershed is generally understood to comprise the six sub-catchments
of the Chao He and Bai He Rivers, which together feed the Miyun reservoir. Located
north of Beijing, the catchment covers an area of 15,788 km2. In total, around one
million people live in the watershed area and the reservoir supplies between 60–80%
of urban drinking water needs; an estimated 17 million people rely on it for their
drinking water. This makes the watershed one of the most important water protec-
tion areas in the world (Li and Emerton 2012).
In the past 30–40 years, several attempts had been made to reforest the Miyun
landscape in response to worsening water crises (Li and Emerton 2012). Conifers
(Pinophyta) and other species were planted to compensate for the disappearance of
the original broadleaf forest, and strict controls on logging, land and forest use were
implemented (Li and Emerton 2012). Due to a lack of active management however,
the newly planted trees did not achieve a healthy ecological status– around three-
quarters of the trees were categorised as ‘sub-healthy’ or ‘unhealthy’. The strict
controls also economically disadvantaged the local communities whose livelihoods
had previously been associated with forest products (Li and Emerton 2012).
C. vanHam and H. Klimmek
Against this backdrop, IUCN initiated a project in the Miyun watershed in
2007, which introduced a new set of forest management tools and brought about
a shift from a strictly protective and very conservative regime, to one based on
sustainable use and active management by local communities. The policy advo-
cacy activities undertaken as part of the project focused on showcasing the mul-
tiple benets of a multi-functional forest landscape. This reassured the Chinese
government of the local community’s capacity to responsibly manage the area’s
forests, and helped to bring about a formal agreement to recognise different for-
est management and use regimes, harmonising the technical information held
by government foresters with local knowledge and interests (Li and Emerton
2012; IUCN 2012b).
By bringing together many diverse stakeholders and sectors at different levels,
the project effectively developed a more integrated form of landscape management
and restored the Miyun landscape in a way that recognises the multiple needs and
functions of the watershed. With this approach, the initiative brought about a regen-
eration of natural forest and improvements in forest structure, quality and function
(Li and Emerton 2012). The Harava Survery Tool– AnInnovative Mechanism
toSupport Citizen Participation inVitoria-Gasteiz
As outlined above, citizen engagement requires signicant investment and plan-
ning. However, there are a range of innovative tools that can support the process.
Harava, for example, is an interactive map-based survey tool for smart planning,
which enables organisations to conduct structured surveys with spatial data to
inform decision-making, by collecting insights, ideas, and feedback from citizens
who have practical knowledge and understanding of their surroundings.
Following an agreement between the city of Vitoria-Gasteiz (Spain) and
Tecnalia, and with support from partners (SYKE Finnish Environment Institute),
Harava was used to develop an urban management plan for Vitoria Gasteiz in 2013
(Ayuntamiento de Vitoria-Gasteiz, nd). The platform provided citizens with the
opportunity to actively participate in the urban planning process by allowing them
to take part in a survey covering a range of topics related to favourite and most
frequented public areas, and more general views related to urban development and
social inclusiveness.
Three hundred citizens participated in the two-month consultation process, pro-
viding information about 2497 spatial elements within the city (Herranz-Pasual
etal. 2014). The consultation captured information such as how often and for what
purpose citizens visit the city centre and rural areas. The tool also allowed citizens
to convey their views on areas for improvement e.g. the need more trade and eco-
nomic activities, particularly small businesses, to help make the city a more liveable
place, as well as the need for better bike and pedestrian connections and public
transport (Herranz-Pasual etal. 2014).
16 Partnerships forNature-Based Solutions inUrban Areas– Showcasing...
By engaging citizens in these types of participatory processes, governments
have the opportunity to obtain information they might otherwise not have access to
and on this basis, adapt spatial planning and management approaches to make cit-
ies more liveable and appealing to the people who live in them. Given that live-
ability is closely linked to the existence of green spaces (Beatley 2012) this type of
collaboration has the potential to provide a sound basis for developing innovative
solutions to urban challenges and implementing NBS, which benet both local
people and the environment. Berlin– ThePower ofCitizen Engagement andLeadership
The Vitoria-Gasteiz example illustrates how governments can employ innovative
mechanisms to engage citizens and ensure that city planning incorporates the needs
and wishes of its people. But there are also instances where social activism has been
the driver of conservation action.
In Berlin, Germany, the decision to protect the disused Tempelhof aireld from
housing development and convert it into one of the city’s most popular parks came
as a result of a citizen-initiated referendum in May 2014 and a series of open com-
munity meetings, citizen working groups and consultations through an online plat-
form. Citizen engagement in determining the future of the Tempelhof site started
through public meetings, forums and lectures before the airport was closed in 2008.
A web dialogue drew 68,000 users and 2500 idea contributors, and surveys were
distributed to 6000 local households and to 1000 households in Berlin (Burgess
2014). Moderated focus groups were established to engage migrants groups, often
marginalised in consultation processes. Following the closure of the airport, consul-
tations and large-scale public events continued to take place. In 2009, 3500 people
attended a “Call for Ideas”, and more than 2000 people visited an Open House event
showcasing concept ideas for developing the site (Burgess 2014). Finally, it was the
“100% Tempelhofer Feld” civil society group, who pushed for the referendum that
determined the future of the site (Burgess 2014).
Today, Tempelhof Park is one of the most popular parks in Berlin, hosting a
variety of recreation facilities. Sealed areas such as former runways are used for
cycling and running, while some lawn areas have become nature conservation
zones and other zones have been designated for urban gardening, educational activ-
ities or recreational activities such as barbecuing (Burgess 2014). The 100%
Tempelhofer Feld group continues to actively work to protect the natural areas and
cultural heritage of the park and ensure continued open public access for the future.
The transformation of the Tempelhof Park in Berlin from a disused aireld to a lively
urban park illustrates how strong social engagement can result in the creation or main-
tenance of green areas which support biodiversity conservation, contributing to urban
resilience and providing cultural and recreational ecosystem services (URBES 2014b).
C. vanHam and H. Klimmek
16.3.2 Reections andLessons Learned
The above examples illustrate how involving local users of natural resources in
planning and decision-making can help to support the implementation of more
effective environmental management regimes which benet both people and nature.
Citizen engagement in urban planning and ecosystem management can be
time consuming and costly, and requires the development of trust between
stakeholder groups and exibility to accommodate changes in planning and pro-
cesses (Li and Emerton 2012). When done successfully however, citizen partici-
pation and engagement can support urban planning by helping to uncover the
needs and wishes of local people, thereby providing the basis for increasing the
livability of urban spaces, which has the potential to benet both people and
nature. Citizen engagement can also provide an entry-point to identifying poten-
tial NBS which could address the key societal challenges identied by urban
citizens in a holistic manner that is respectful of community needs and
16.4 Integrated Urban andRegional Planning forNBS
Governments are increasingly searching for cost-effective and holistic ways of
addressing environmental challenges, which not only reliably deliver their imme-
diate intended impacts, such as space for recreation and reduced air pollution, but
also bring additional benets to society, such as improved health and
Policymakers in cities and at the sub-national level can lead the way in making
the transition towards increasing resilience and integrating ecological concerns
within urban planning and decision-making. Instead of an infrastructure agenda in
which nature is a problem, a cost, and a political risk, nature can become part of
the solution.
Cities around Europe have already shown a commitment to integrating nature
into their urban planning and management, and thereby demonstrated awareness of
the importance of protecting natural capital. The Regional Climate Plan for Paris,
for example, highlights the importance of protecting ecosystems in order to adapt to
and mitigate climate change (Conseil Regional D’Île-De-France 2011). The city
also recognises that forest management practices which optimise their capacity for
adaptation and resilience can lead to multiple benets for biodiversity, people and
the city (Natureparif 2015).
Additional examples of cities that have integrated nature within their planning
and strategies are outlined below.
16 Partnerships forNature-Based Solutions inUrban Areas– Showcasing...
16.4.1 Examples fortheIntegration ofNature inUrban
Planning Gibsons’ Eco-Asset Strategy forClimate Adaptation
Mapping and assessing ecosystems and their services is essential to ensure that their
values are taken into account in decision-making and integrated across policies and
sectors. The town of Gibsons, north of Vancouver in Canada, is pioneering a strategy
that could contribute to the efforts of municipalities in Canada and elsewhere to
improve climate resilience. Gibsons’ “Eco-Asset strategy” focuses on identifying
existing natural assets such as green space, forests, topsoil, aquifers and creeks that
provide municipal services such as storm water management; measuring the value
of the municipal services provided by these assets; and making this information
operational by integrating it into municipal asset management. This is proving to be
an effective nancial and municipal management approach that complements strate-
gies to maintain, replace and build both traditional engineered assets such as roads
and storm sewers and engineered ‘green assets’ such as rain gardens, parks and bio-
swales. Integrating natural assets into decision-making can support municipal cli-
mate change adaptation and resilience building efforts in a cost-effective way.
Gibsons’ aquifer, for example, which is part of the municipal asset management
strategy, requires about $28,000 annually in monitoring costs. This is a cost- effective
NBS to water security compared to the much higher operational costs of a ltration
and treatment plant. Philadelphia’s Natural Solution forStormwater Management
Philadelphia is another city in North America which has integrated nature into
city planning (Qin etal. 2015). Already in the 19th century, the city had acquired
approximately 3600 hectares of natural areas to help lter and regulate its pota-
ble water, and the land remains protected as parkland (Gartner etal. 2014).
Confronted by frequent sewer overows during storms, Philadelphia recently
conducted a cost- benet analysis of green infrastructure options—such as tree
planting, permeable pavement and green roofs—and conventional grey options,
such as storage tunnels (UNEP 2014). The economic benets associated with
green infrastructure ranged from $1.94 billion to $4.45 billion, compared to just
$0.06 billion to $0.14 billion from grey infrastructure (UNEP 2014). In 2011,
the city adopted the “Green City, Clean Waters” plan to reduce stormwater pol-
lution by greening public spaces and creating a living landscape that slows, l-
ters and consumes rainfall. City ofcials expect to reduce stormwater and
sewage pollution entering the waterways by 85% when the project is completed
(Qin etal. 2015).
C. vanHam and H. Klimmek
285 Nature Flood Management intheUK– “Slow theFlow”
In the UK, a natural ood management scheme played a prominent role in
preventing oods in a small town in North Yorkshire, Pickering, in December
2015. An upstream ood storage reservoir was installed, 40,000 trees planted
and heather moorland restored to soak up incoming water (Harrabin 2016).
Based on the success of this “Slow the Flow” scheme, options for developing a
25-year plan which looks at the management of river catchment areas to improve
ood resilience for the environment are now being explored (Harrabin 2016). A
major study by Forest Research, an arm of the Forestry Commission in the UK,
recently found that planting trees in hills and along watercourses could signi-
cantly reduce ooding, soil erosion and water pollution and highlighted the need
to “increase incentives for woodland planting by making these better reect the
full range of water and other benets” (Nisbet etal. 2011). Quantifying water
benets and evaluating how woodland can be best integrated with agriculture
and urban activities for water and wider environmental benets, while minimis-
ing any water trade-offs, is a critical step in order to garner support from local
stakeholders such as landowners and farmers (Nisbet etal. 2011).
16.4.2 Reections andLessons Learned
Integrating nature within planning and policies can have clear benets for citizens,
not only by improving water quality or climate resilience, but also by saving money.
Green spaces in cities can also add value to commercial and private property and
can contribute to a city’s tax revenues as well as attract more visitors and private
sector investment (CBD 2012).
Urban planning often fails to fully recognise the connection between cities
and their natural surroundings. Natural infrastructure must play a more inuen-
tial role in the planning and design of cities and urban regions, but this is often
hampered by budgetary constraints. The examples above demonstrate that mak-
ing the protection of natural assets and enhancement of ecosystem functions a
prominent part of decision- making can offer cost-effective solutions to a range
of challenges.
A major challenge to upscaling the implementation of NBS is the lack of a
solid evidence base showcasing the benefits of NBS over traditional approaches
to climate change adaptation. As a result, policy-makers tend to favour the
implementation of traditional engineering solutions for climate adaptation,
instead of investing in NBS (Rizvi etal. 2015). More concrete data on the cost-
effectiveness of nature- based approaches and field evidence is required to
showcase the solutions ecosystems have to offer (Rizvi etal. 2015) and the ben-
efits they can bring.
16 Partnerships forNature-Based Solutions inUrban Areas– Showcasing...
16.5 Conclusion
This chapter has demonstrated that multi-stakeholder partnerships for NBS can lead
to substantial social, economic and environmental benets and can support adapta-
tion to climate change (see Table16.1 below).
The chapter also highlighted a number of lessons that can inform future partner-
ships for NBS:
Table 16.1 Summary of NBS partnerships and resulting benets discussed in this chapter
Example Type of partnership Benets
Natural Infrastructure for
Online platform for members
(businesses) of the World
Business Council for
Sustainable Development
Increased awareness of the
business opportunities for
investing in ecosystems
Volkswagen, ecosystem
restoration initiative in
Puebla-Tlaxcala Valley,
Volkswagen, National
protected areas Commission
and Secretary of the
Environment, Mexico
Secure drinking water supply and
water supply for Volkswagen’s
production plant, carbon
sequestration, biodiversity
Rehabilitation of quarry
in Bellegarde, France
LafargeHolcim, French
National Musueum of
National History, local
municipality Bellegarde
Stormwater management, ood
prevention, biodiversity, water
quality, recreational benets
Miyun watershed, Beijng IUCN (with support from
DGIS–Netherlands Ministry
of Foreign Affairs), local
communities, local
Strengthened livelihoods,
sustainable forest use, regeneration
of natural forest and improvements
in forest structure, quality and
Vitoria-Gasteiz citizen
Municipality of Vitoria-
Gasteiz, citizens, Tecnalia,
SYKE Finnish Environment
Access to information to make the
city more liveable, sustainable
urban development
Citizen engagement in
Tempelhof Park, Berlin
City of Berlin, citizen working
Public access to Tempelhof Park,
providing natural space and
cultural and educational
Gibsons Eco-asset
Municipality of Gibsons,
scientic partners and
Mapping and assessing ecosystems
and their services within the
municipality and integration of the
value of nature into municipal
asset management
stormwater management
Philadelphia Water
Department, private
developers, US Environmental
Protection Agency,
universities, citizens
Cost-benet analysis to integrate
natural solutions into city planning
for reduced storm water and
sewage pollution
Pickering “Slow the
Forestry Commission, Town
of Pickering
Improved ood resilience,
assessment of water trade-offs with
agriculture and urban development
C. vanHam and H. Klimmek
Multidisciplinary and inclusive partnerships can foster the uptake of NBS in
response to climate-related challenges. They can create and catalyse synergies
between different parts of society by pooling together resources skills and
Involving citizens in urban decision making can help to make cities more live-
able, identify opportunities for implementing NBS, and create trust, ownership
and stewardship.
Innovative tools (e.g. Harava) can help to incorporate different stakeholder views
within urban planning and policymaking and have the potential to support the
development of NBS.
Creating trust and learning to understand each other’s language better can help to
form the basis for joint action.
The development of replicable business models which quantify the values of
nature at local and landscape level and present a reliable return on invest-
ment can help to gain private sector support and leverage public investment
in NBS.
There is a need to develop a more solid evidence base on the multiple benets,
and particularly the cost-effectiveness of nature-based approaches to gain
more wide-spread support for NBS at city level. Experts on measuring the
qualitative and quantitative economic and social benets and services provided
by ecosystems, can help to create visibility for the value of a city’s natural
assets and promote the uptake of NBS in urban planning and management.
Sharing these types of examples and lessons can serve as a strong foundation for
promoting NBS and can help to inspire future partnerships for, and investments in
Abbott J (2013) Sharing the city: community participation in urban management. Routledge.
Ayunamiento de Vitoria-Gasteiz (nd) Plataforma Harava-Encuesta Online. Informe de
Resultados ¡Ayúdanos a ver Vitoria-Gasteiz! 1ª Fase del Proceso Participativo para el Avance
de la Revisión del PGOU de Vitoria-Gasteiz. Available at:
wb021/http/contenidosEstaticos/adjuntos/es/47/16/54716.pdf Accessed 18 May 2016
Beatley T (2012) Green urbanism: learning from European cities. Island Press, Washington, DC
Buchner BK, Trabacchi C, Mazza F, Abramskiehn D, Wang D (2015) Global Landscape of Climate
Finance. Climate Policy Initiative
Burgess K (2014) Community participation in parks development: two examples from Berlin [Blog]
the nature of cities. Available at: 2014/12/10/community-
participation-in-parks-development-two-examples-from-berlin/ Accessed 18 May 2016
Conseil Regional D’Île-De-France (2011) Plan Regional Pour Le Climat D’Île-De-France.
Available at:les/mariane/RAPCR43-11RAP.pdf
Convention on Biological Diversity (2012) Cities and biodiversity outlook. Montreal. Available at:
Frantzeskaki N, Wittmayer J, Loorbach D (2014) The role of partnerships in ‘realizing’ urban
sustainability in Rotterdam’s City Ports Area, the Netherlands. JClean Prod 65:406–417
16 Partnerships forNature-Based Solutions inUrban Areas– Showcasing...
Gartner T, Mehan GT III, Mulligan J, Roberson JA, Stangel P, Qin Y (2014) Protecting forested
watersheds is smart economics for water utilities. JAm Water Works Assoc 106(9):54–64
Greensurge (2015) Report of Case Study City Portraits. Available at:ler/
Harrabin R (2016) Pickering leaky dams ood prevention scheme ‘a success’. BBC.Available at: Accessed 11 May 2016
Herzog C (2013) People Take Over Nature in Cities with their Own Hands. Available at: http://www.
Herranz-Pasual K, Oaniagua C, Abajo B, and Feliu E (2014) How do you imagine Vitoria-Gasteiz
in 2025– Experiences of citizen participation in urban planning using the Harava tool [Blog]
Available at:
in.html Accessed 18 May 2016
Irvin RA, Stansbury J (2004) Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public
Adm Rev 64(1):55–65
IUCN (2012a) IUCN business engagement strategy Available at:
business- and-biodiversity/resources/working-business-and-biodiversity-programme
IUCN (2012b) Livelihoods and landscapes strategy: results and resolutions. Gland: IUCN.Available
Kabisch N, Frantzeskaki N, Pauleit S, Naumann S, Davis M, Artmann M, Haase D, Knapp S, Korn
H, Stadler J, Zaunberger K, Bonn A (2016) Nature-based solutions to climate change mitiga-
tion and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and
opportunities for action. Ecol Soc 2(2)
Kongrukgreatiyos K (2014) The private sector’s role in climate change resilience [blog] the
Rockerfeller foundation Available at:
sectors- role-climate-change/ Accessed 10 May 2016
Li J, Emerton L (2012) Moving closer to nature: lessons for landscapes and livelihoods from the
Miyun landscape, China. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland
McDonald RI, Marcotullio PJ, Güneralp B (2013) Urbanization and global trends in biodiversity
and ecosystem services. In: Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and
opportunities. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 31–52
Munich RE (2015) Insurance solutions for industry. Topics Risk Solutions, Issue 3. Available at:
Natureparif (2015) Climate: Nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation
in Paris Region–Overview of Propositions for discussion at the 21st session of the Conference
of the Parties on Climate Change (COP21). Paris: Natureparif. Available at: https://www. based_solutions_for_climate_
change_mitigation_and_adaptation_in_Paris_Region. Accessed 18 May 2016
Nisbet T, Silgram M, Shah N, Morrow K, Broadmeadow S (2011) Woodland for water: woodland
measures for meeting water framework directive objectives. Forest Research Monograph, 4.
Available at:$FILE/FRMG004_
Ozment S, DiFrancesco K, Gartner T (2015) The role of natural infrastructure in the water, energy
and food nexus, Nexus Dialolgue Synthesis Papers. Switzerland: IUCN
Qin Y, Gartner T, Otto B (2015) Cities can save money by investing in natural infrastructure for
water [Blog] world resources institute. Available at:
can- save-money-investing-natural-infrastructure-water?utm_campaign=wridigest&utm_
source=wridigest-2015-10-27&utm_medium=email&utm_content=learnmore Accessed 10
May 2016
RESTORE–Rivers: Engaging, Supporting and Transferring Knowledge for Restoration in Europe
(2016). Available at:
fuseaction=search.dspPage&n_proj_id=3780&docType=pdf Accessed 10 May 2016
C. vanHam and H. Klimmek
Rizvi AR, Baig S, Verdone M (2015) Ecosystems based adaptation: knowledge gaps in making an
economic case for investing in nature based solutions for climate change. Gland: IUCN.Available
Rushworth J, Warau M (2015) World Business Council for Sustainable Development natu-
ral infrastructure case study. Water Management and Flood Prevention in France, http://
Science for Environment Policy (2016) Research for environmental policymaking: how to priori-
tise, communicate and measure impact. Thematic Issue 54. Issue produced for the European
Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol. Available
at: Accessed 18 May 2016
UNEP (2014) Green Infrastructure Guide for Water Management: Ecosystem-based management
approaches for water-related infrastructure projects. Available at:
sites/default/les/Green-infrastructure-Guide-UNEP.pdf Accessed 18 May 2016
URBES (Urban Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Project) (2014a) Factsheet 7: Urban agricul-
ture: landscapes connecting people, food and biodiversity. Available at:
URBES (Urban Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Project) (2014b) Factsheet 5: Urban resil-
ience and sustainability, two sides of the same coin? Available at: http://www.mistraurbanfu-les/urbes_factsheet_05_web.pdf
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2010) Volkswagen–Replenishing ground-
water through reforestation in Mexico. Responding to the Biodiversity Challenge Business
contributions to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at:
web/nagoya/RespondingtotheBiodiversityChallenge.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2016
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (, which permits use, sharing,
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate
credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and
indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative
Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not
included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by
statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder.
16 Partnerships forNature-Based Solutions inUrban Areas– Showcasing...
... Low data availability and lack of standardisation Abo-El-Wafa et al., 2018;Mensah, 2017;O'Donnell et al., 2017;Douglas, 2018;du Toit et al., 2018;Staddon et al., 2018 Limited technical capacity Poor long term maintenance Legal and institutional barriers Pro-grey infrastructure path dependence Kabisch et al., 2016;Van Ham & Klimmek, 2017;O'Donnell et al., 2017;Douglas, 2018;Mensah, 2017;Herslund et al., 2018 Monetary and nonmonetary valuation is particularly challenging because all UGI cannot be commoditised, nor are all the benefits tangible (e.g., identity value, human wellbeing). While the economic case for investing in ecosystem services derived from UGI is sound, and methodologies do exist (e.g., The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity), municipal departments typically lack methodologies that value UGI in a routine way that is comparable to other types of infrastructure. ...
... Foresight tools can bring citizens, designers, and planners together to reimagine how green corridors can make social-ecological connections (Frantzeskaki, 2019). Moreover, the holistic nature of UGI has the potential to overcome institutional and sectoral silos (Van Ham & Klimmek, 2017), by shifting fragmented spaces to more multifunctional spaces (Pauleit et al., 2017). Collaboration across different sectors is important to realise this potential . ...
Full-text available
Despite a growing recognition of the importance of designing, rehabilitating, and maintaining green infrastructure to provide essential ecosystem services and adapt to climate change, many decision makers in sub-Saharan Africa continue to favour engineered solutions and short term economic growth at the expense of natural landscapes and longer term sustainability agendas. Existing green infrastructure is typically maintained in more affluent suburbs, inadvertently perpetuating historic inequalities. This is in part because there remains a lack of fine-grained, comparative evidence on the barriers and enablers to mainstreaming green infrastructure in peri-urban areas. Here, we developed an analytical framework based on a review of 155 studies, screened to include 29 studies in 24 countries. Results suggest eight overarching categories of interconnected barriers to green infrastructure in peri-urban areas. Using a combinatorial mixed method approach, we then surveyed households in nine settlements in drought-prone Windhoek (n=330) and seven settlements in flood-prone Dar es Salaam (n=502) and conducted key informant interviews (n=118). Peri-urban residents in Windhoek and Dar es Salaam indicated 18 forms of green infrastructure and 47 derived ecosystem services. The most frequently reported barriers were financial (40.8%), legal and institutional barriers (35.8%) followed by land use change and spatial trade-offs (33%) and finally ecosystem disservices (30.6%). The most significant barriers in Dar es Salaam were legal and institutional (22.7%) and in Windhoek were land use change and spatial trade-offs (24.4%). At the household level, the principal barrier was financial; at community and municipal levels the main barriers were related to design, performance, and maintenance; while at the national level, the main barriers were legal and institutional. Embracing institutional cultures of adaptive policymaking, equitable partnerships, co-designing futures, integrated landscape management and experimental innovation have potential to scale long term maintenance for urban green infrastructure and foster agency, creativity and more transformative relationships and outcomes.
... Economic-Inadequate financing of NBS implementation is one of the most commonly cited barriers to large-scale uptake [8,12,13,38,[40][41][42][43][44][45]. Financing barriers identified include an over reliance on public sector funding [36,45,46] and competing priorities for land use, e.g., land needed for housing [12,38]. ...
... Another widely recognised barrier to NBS is the complexity of governance which requires consensusbuilding among multiple stakeholders [1,8,37]. Co-production of NBS with the local community and entrepreneurs is seen as critical in NBS planning, delivery and maintenance [15,41,48]. A key enabling factor for NBS is partnerships among stakeholders which in turn contributes to a more equitable distribution of the benefits of NBS and minimises negative trade-offs [8,42,45]. ...
Full-text available
Nature-based enterprises (NBEs) have recently emerged as important actors in the delivery of nature-based solutions (NBS) to societal challenges, but little is known about the context in which they operate and the factors influencing their development. The empirical research undertaken in this study provides a first insight into the most significant barriers and enablers nature-based enterprises face in their external environment. Findings were drawn from a review of literature triangulated with a survey of 148 nature-based enterprises and interviews with the founders/CEOs of 22 NBEs. Political factors were identified as the most significant external influence, with increased awareness and incorporation of NBS into relevant policies and economic instruments seen to play a significant role in market development. Conversely, policy inconsistencies and poorly designed public procurement approaches present significant challenges. Other key influencing factors relate to financing (both public and private), lack of industry standards and impact measurement. Industry networking and access to education, training and skill development emerged as key enablers, with university collaborations highly regarded. Further in-depth research is recommended to explore indications of disparities in the levels of awareness, financing, and skills gaps across different regions of Europe and different nature-based economic activities.
... Overall, consensus is elusive on how much citizen participation contributes to sustainable outcomes in NBS. The nexus of citizen participation, NBS and sustainability outcomes is relatively new and unstudied (e.g., Mees et al., 2019;Wamsler et al., 2020) and mostly focused on methods and modes of participation, perception and acceptance of NBS (Ferreira et al., 2020;van Ham & Klimmek, 2017). ...
Full-text available
The last half‐a‐century has seen a marked demand for authentic citizen participation in public policy‐and decision‐making, not least in the field of sustainability. The depth and forms of citizen engagement in nature‐based solutions (NBS), for example, and how such participation shapes their trajectories is gaining increasing attention. In this paper, we analyze current forms and implications of citizen participation in 58 NBS case studies conducted in 21 cities in the light of supporting wider sustainability goals. Our results show that while tokenistic forms dominate citizen participation across a variety of NBS contexts, collaborative multi‐stakeholder forms of engagement do not automatically lead to enhanced ecological functions. Deeper forms of engagement, however, strengthen and diversify both expected and unexpected social outcomes, including social learning, enhanced sense of belonging, environmental stewardship, and inclusiveness and equity, in general. Driven by neoliberal austerity logic governments often cede power to NBS promoters whose interests predefine an intervention's vision of nature. Deeper levels of participation are hence limited by inherent institutional structures, neoliberal regimes and the lack of trust among actors involved. These limitations can be partially bridged by strengthening relational and reflexive capacities of public institutions. Focusing on the process of citizen engagement and creating multiple arenas for discussion could bring out new voices and narratives and also transform the culture of participation.
... Instead, still limited research seems to address other problematic issues and knowledge gaps like governance and institutional arrangements for NBS implementation in urban areas [11,12], where a multiplicity of stakeholders need to be involved in decisionmaking processes [13] and particular attention needs to be paid to empowering citizens and local communities in co-production and co-management of solutions [14,15]. ...
Much research has been done to evaluate the impacts of Nature-based Solutions (NBS) in spatial planning and management at the different scales and to show their positive effects. Main policy documents also mention the importance to adopt nature-based approaches in urban planning, built on circular economies, integration and multifunctionality. Nevertheless, when it comes to actual practices in urban planning and policies, approaches and solutions still mainly follow old traditional approaches. How to foster the uptake of NBS innovations in practice is thus a crucial question for urban planners. The paper aims at contributing to this discussion by investigating whether, to what extent and in what form NBS have succeeded in piercing in the Apulia region, where some recent policies have been trying to foster the uptake of such solutions first into urban regeneration projects and then into the broader urban planning sector. To this purpose the framework known as Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) has been applied to show the transition pathway undertaken in urban planning and policies in Apulia towards an NBS approach as well as the potential of different policy instrument mixes to support and give long-term perspectives to nature-based innovations while lowering resistance to their consolidation and diffusion.
... Formal education in classrooms and informal education through the media, internet, and tourism opportunities can facilitate uptake of NbS (Chen et al., 2019). Online repositories of NbS efforts, with transparent documentation of successes and failures, can enable sharing of knowledge and experiences, access to feedback and professional consultation, incorporation of citizen knowledge, mapping of NbS issues, and showcasing of best practices in implementing NbS (Faivre et al., 2017) 5,6 ; such efforts will aid in assessment of NbS effectiveness and trade-offs for better decision making (Bayraktarov et al., 2016;Firth et al., 2020;Seddon et al., 2020) and may in turn promote future investments in natural infrastructure (van Ham and Klimmek, 2017;Airoldi et al., 2021). ...
Full-text available
Nature-based Solutions (NbS) have been advocated to protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural or modified ecosystems, simultaneously providing human well-being and biodiversity benefits. The uptake of NbS differs regionally with some countries exhibiting greater uptake than others. The success of NbS also differs regionally with varying environmental conditions and social-ecological processes. In many regions, the body of knowledge, particularly around the efficacy of such efforts, remains fragmented. Having an "inventory" or "tool box" of regionally-trialed methods, outcomes and lessons learnt can improve the evidence base, inform adaptive management, and ultimately support the uptake of NbS. Using Malaysia as a case study, we provide a comprehensive overview of trialed and tested NbS efforts that used nature to address societal challenges in marine and coastal environments (here referring to mangroves, seagrass, coral reefs), and detailed these efforts according to their objectives, as well as their anticipated and actual outcomes. The NbS efforts were categorized according to the IUCN NbS approach typology and mapped to provide a spatial overview of IUCN NbS effort types. A total of 229 NbS efforts were collated, representing various levels of implementation success. From the assessment of these efforts, several key actions were identified as a way forward to enhance the uptake of Nature-based Solutions for informing coastal sustainable development policy and planning. These include increasing education, training, and knowledge sharing; rationalizing cooperation across jurisdictions, laws, and regulations; enhancing environmental monitoring; leveraging on existing policies; enabling collaboration and communication; and implementing sustainable finance instruments. These findings can be used to inform the improved application and uptake of NbS, globally.
There has been a great deal of interest in recent years in this journal and others in the emerging science and practice of nature-based solutions (NBS) to environmental and climate challenges. Whilst the policy dynamics of these interventions are starting to slowly emerge, less is known about the interface of policy-politics-evidence for NBS. This paper argues that there is a role that public environmental agencies acting as boundary actors can play in the successful brokering of knowledge about NBS into policy. Situated loosely within boundary conceptual approaches, it offers an empirical case study of a UK public boundary agency seeking to broker knowledge about NBS into national policy making forum, which are highly political. The results show that this agency utlises four key tools for navigating ‘the political’ in brokering evidence about NBS into policy: communications and framing, embedding, selectivity, and lobbying. These findings reveal new insights about how public agencies navigate the free market of knowledge production through a four-part tool kit. It concludes by offering suggestions for the wider applicability of the research to the still emerging field of policy for NBS.
The complex societal challenges facing policymakers today are deeply interlinked and require transformative, systems-level approaches to reduce risk and build resilience in the face of deep uncertainty about the future. Water security cannot be separated from climate change, natural hazards, food security, urbanization, poverty alleviation, and global pandemics. Each of these challenges has a water component, though none are solely water issues. Such challenges require resilient and effective responses that are sustainable for both communities and ecosystems. Responses must be flexible, robust, and based on a holistic management approach and cross-sectoral collaboration. Policy can play a key role in a strong enabling environment for these approaches, yet current international policy frameworks are not designed or implemented in ways that promote integrated planning across sectors, across policy frameworks, or across borders in regions with shared natural resources. This chapter provides an introduction to the major global policy frameworks and identifies potential areas for targeted, evidence-based NBS to contribute to the global goals and thereby enhance societal and ecological resilience.
Systematic conservation planning is a scientific method of prioritising scarce resources to minimise the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. The approach aims to consider social, economic and political imperatives, and may be used by municipalities to designate their (predominantly) natural open space systems, in the form of a conservation plan. However, the multidimensional outcomes of implementing these conservation plans — in terms of both positive and negative ecological, social, and institutional dimensions — are rarely critically evaluated. We present a practical approach to assess the outcomes of implementing natural open space plans in urban areas, especially for the local (municipal) level where resource challenges may hinder assessment. The approach, drawn from comparisons of existing conservation assessment frameworks, considers the following outcome categories: ecological/natural; social/human; financial (institutional); and management (institutional). The approach is tested on a South African case study, and factors (challenges and opportunities) affecting the outcomes of implementing natural open space plans are identified. The results underscore how ecological outcomes are negatively affected by habitat transformation attributed to urbanisation and inappropriate land use management; and transgressions such as illegal, exploitive land uses. In respect of the social/human outcomes, collaborative partnerships with civil society, and the involvement of champions, are pivotal to implementation success. We found that financial and management institutional constraints contribute to inadequate investment in natural open space planning exacerbated by budget alignment to short and medium-term socio-economic and political priorities. The inter-dependence of the different outcomes emphasises the complexity of social-ecological systems and the need for a holistic assessment. Understanding the factors affecting the outcomes of implementing natural open space plans allows local government to respond to the emerging knowledge of changing ecological and socio-economic conditions, facilitating the institutionalisation of adaptive management approaches, which appreciate the intertwined nature of social-ecological systems. This can, in turn, enhance decision-making processes, and advance conservation outcomes, ecosystem resilience and resulting flows of ecosystem services provided by nature, which are essential for human well-being.
Many European countries witness growing interest in allotment gardening. Thus, private allotment gardens (AGs) have been created in some countries, including Spain. As a result, there are places where non-consumptive and commodified allotment gardens coexist. The paper presents an in-depth comparison of public and private AGs through the lens of the nature-based solutions (NBS) concept. First, we assess the importance that gardeners attribute to the spectrum of environmental and socio-economic impacts provided by both types of AGs; we identify differences and similarities in their development and management, and assess the demographic and socioeconomic profile of gardeners. Subsequently, we discuss gardeners’ and other stakeholders’ opinions on both types of AGs and explore the roles that they can play as solutions for urban policy challenges. Our results show that both types of AGs are nature-based solutions with particularly positive impacts on the health and well-being of their users. These gardens do not compete but complement each other, fostered by their role as multifunctional nature-based solutions. Moreover, the option of cultivating a private or a public AG seems to be more linked to the freedom of cultivation and the freedom of access rather than economic reasons. We conclude that in the current complex scenario, public and private AGs must have territorial, legal and institutional frameworks within all urban policies that explore NBS.
Rapid growth of urban areas has attracted foremost global attention in the last few decades. By 2050, India is expected to be the center of urbanization with 68 Indian cities having population of around a million. Rapid urbanization has resulted in huge loss of urban blue-green infrastructure (BGI) resulting in loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. There is growing need of disaster proofing fast expanding Indian cities. It is fundamental to explore, customize and integrate Nature-based Solutions (NbS) based resilience planning by restoring existing BGI in Tier I Indian megacities to curb the growing risks within acceptable limits. There is huge scope for exploration and mainstreaming of NbS in Tier II and Tier III cities that have space to plan BGI as per the growing population requirements and anticipated future risks. Scientifically planned NbS can help towards building resilience by maintaining the socio-cultural, economic, and ecosystem sustainability. The present chapter provides an overview of BGI as an efficient NbS and mainstreaming of nature-based interventions to ensure sustainable habitat in Indian megacities and growing small cities. The chapter highlights the factors that determine the use of urban NbS and underlines the problems associated with the implementation of NbS.
Full-text available
ABSTRACT. Nature-based solutions promoting green and blue urban areas have significant potential to decrease the vulnerability and enhance the resilience of cities in light of climatic change. They can thereby help to mitigate climate change-induced impacts and serve as proactive adaptation options for municipalities. We explore the various contexts in which nature-based solutions are relevant for climate mitigation and adaptation in urban areas, identify indicators for assessing the effectiveness of nature-based solutions and related knowledge gaps. In addition, we explore existing barriers and potential opportunities for increasing the scale and effectiveness of nature-based solution implementation. The results were derived from an inter-and transdisciplinary workshop with experts from research, municipalities, policy, and society. As an outcome of the workshop discussions and building on existing evidence, we highlight three main needs for future science and policy agendas when dealing with nature-based solutions: (i) produce stronger evidence on nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation and mitigation and raise awareness by increasing implementation; (ii) adapt for governance challenges in implementing nature-based solutions by using reflexive approaches, which implies bringing together new networks of society, nature-based solution ambassadors, and practitioners; (iii) consider socio-environmental justice and social cohesion when implementing nature-based solutions by using integrated governance approaches that take into account an integrative and transdisciplinary participation of diverse actors. Taking these needs into account, nature-based solutions can serve as climate mitigation and adaptation tools that produce additional cobenefits for societal well-being, thereby serving as strong investment options for sustainable urban planning.
Full-text available
This chapter introduces patterns of urbanization, biodiversity, and ecosystem services at the global scale. Underpinning the goals of the chapter is the notion that cities are inextricably linked to the biophysical world, although these linkages are increasingly difficult to clearly identify. The chapter starts by introducing the idea that cities both impact and depend upon the biophysical environment. We go on to discuss how urbanization is both the cause of societal or environmental problems and the solution to many problems, depending on the time-scale and scope of the analysis. Finally, we provide a global overview of cities’ relationships with two key facets of the environment: biodiversity and freshwater ecosystem services.
Full-text available
Recent advancements in the understanding of the benefits provided by healthy, well-managed forests provide water systems nationwide with a new approach to tackle America's imposing drinking water infrastructure needs. With sturdy, long-lived roots, multilayered canopies, and varied soil composition, forests help to regulate water yield and peak flow, as well as mitigate sedimentation and nutrient loading. Therefore, maintaining healthy, forested landscapes and implementing best practices in forestry management can be effective strategies for promoting source water quality and regulating flow. Because of aging water utility infrastructure, a growing population, growing affluence, and increasing threats to forested watersheds from climate change and other factors, water quality managers are paying closer attention to the benefits of forests as a least-cost option compared with, say, costly engineered solutions. This is not an either-or proposition. Society will always need well-financed, effective, and well-engineered gray infrastructure.
Full-text available
Port relocation leaves a mark on the city's landscape and history. In Rotterdam, a medium-sized urban delta, the harbour activities are being relocated from close to the city centre to outwards on the sea. This leaves the city with a regeneration challenge accounting for an area of 1600 ha that it is addressed through the drawing up of an ambitious vision. We investigate the partnerships that emerged and contributed by taking up the realisation of the vision. The partnerships further develop and bring to the ground the vision while remaining inspired and driven by sustainability as a guiding and practicing principle. A mapping framework is developed to examine the governance imprint of partnerships along two axes: their impact in terms of synergies and the governance role they adopt. Success factors pertinent to the case include: the sustainability vision created a momentum for action, enjoyed political attention and commitment and was received as a flagship committing different actors to its implementation. Additional factors are the quick reflexes of different agencies to take up action at the aftermath of the vision creation, the local government was open to experiment with new and old arrangements and in this way, it reinvented its role without losing its governing responsibility. In this context, partnerships take up meta-governance roles and coordinate self-organised collaborative governance processes while ensuring synergies and delivering on sustainability ambitions.
Full-text available
It is widely argued that increased community participation in government decision making produces many important benefits. Dissent is rare: It is difficult to envision anything but positive outcomes from citizens joining the policy process, collaborating with others and reaching consensus to bring about positive social and environmental change. This article, motivated by contextual problems encountered in a participatory watershed management initiative, reviews the citizen-participation literature and analyzes key considerations in determining whether community participation is an effective policy-making tool. We list conditions under which community participation may be costly and ineffective and when it can thrive and produce the greatest gains in effective citizen governance. From the detritus of an unsuccessful citizen-participation effort, we arrive at a more informed approach to guide policy makers in choosing a decision-making process that is appropriate for a community's particular needs.
In the absence of federal leadership, states and localities are stepping forward to address critical problems like climate change, urban sprawl, and polluted water and air. Fortunately, they have dynamic, innovative models outside U.S. borders. Green Cities of Europe draws on the world's best examples of sustainability to show how other cities can become greener and more livable.
As the need to confront unplanned growth increases, planners, policymakers, and citizens are scrambling for practical tools and examples of successful and workable approaches. Growth management initiatives are underway in the U.S. at all levels, but many American "success stories" provide only one piece of the puzzle. To find examples of a holistic approach to dealing with sprawl, one must turn to models outside of the United States. In Green Urbanism, Timothy Beatley explains what planners and local officials in the United States can learn from the sustainable city movement in Europe. The book draws from the extensive European experience, examining the progress and policies of twenty-five of the most innovative cities in eleven European countries, which Beatley researched and observed in depth during a year-long stay in the Netherlands. Chapters examine: the sustainable cities movement in Europe examples and ideas of different housing and living options transit systems and policies for promoting transit use, increasing bicycle use, and minimizing the role of the automobile creative ways of incorporating greenness into cities ways of readjusting "urban metabolism" so that waste flows become circular programs to promote more sustainable forms of economic development sustainable building and sustainable design measures and features renewable energy initiatives and local efforts to promote solar energy ways of greening the many decisions of local government including ecological budgeting, green accounting, and other city management tools.Throughout, Beatley focuses on the key lessons from these cities -- including Vienna, Helsinki, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Zurich, Amsterdam, London, and Berlin -- and what their experience can teach us about effectively and creatively promoting sustainable development in the United States. Green Urbanism is the first full-length book to describe urban sustainability in European cities, and provides concrete examples and detailed discussions of innovative and practical sustainable planning ideas. It will be a useful reference and source of ideas for urban and regional planners, state and local officials, policymakers, students of planning and geography, and anyone concerned with how cities can become more livable.
Plan Regional Pour Le Climat D’Île-De-France Available at
  • Conseil Regional
Conseil Regional D'Île-De-France (2011) Plan Regional Pour Le Climat D'Île-De-France. Available at: Convention on Biological Diversity (2012) Cities and biodiversity outlook. Montreal. Available at: