Content uploaded by Arda Gezdur
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Arda Gezdur on Sep 13, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Digitization in the Oil and Gas Industry:
Challenges and Opportunities for Supply Chain Partners
Arda Gezdur
1
, Jyotirmoyee Bhattacharjya1,
arda.gezdur@sydney.edu.au; jyotirmoyee.bhattacharjya@sydney.edu.au
1 Institute of Transportation and Logistics Studies, The University of Sydney Business
School. 378 Abercrombie Street, 2006 NSW, Australia
Abstract. Declining oil prices have made it necessary for oil and gas
companies to scrutinize their operations and associated costs. The increase in
data richness from the digitization of supply chain processes could help these
companies manage risks, and increase collaboration and profitability. This
paper explores the challenges and opportunities for oil and gas industry in this
context.
Keywords: Supply chain digitization, supply visibility, supply chain
integration, oil and gas
1 Introduction
Oil and gas are key sources of energy that provide a foundation for global economic
growth. Firms in the oil and gas industry require complex machinery and a large
amount of capital investment. Thus, there are huge barriers for other companies
wishing to enter the industry. Over the years, the industry has experienced high
profitability so digitization has largely been a “nice-to-have”. However, the recent fall
in oil prices due to increasing supply alternatives and slower growth in demand
provides motivation for companies to focus on leaner operations and cost reduction.
Oil and gas supply chains are composed of segmented and discrete data hubs. There
is little transparency across entities in the supply chain. Even within companies, data
is stored and managed separately by different divisions and there is discontinuity in
process flows [15]. Decisions are taken based on disparate spreadsheets without
consideration of the full picture. Appropriate digitization strategies could help with
supply chain integration and information sharing between suppliers, transporters,
storage facilities and customers.
1
Please note that the LNCS Editorial assumes that all authors have used the western
naming convention, with given names preceding surnames. This determines the
structure of the names in the running heads and the author index.
2 <Authors>
2 Supply Chain Digitization in the Oil and Gas Industry
Current trends in the digitization of supply chains include 3D printing, Uberization,
internet of technologies, cloud computing, advanced robotics and drones [7]. The oil
and gas industry can be regarded as a ‘latecomer industry’ [1] in this context. To
explore the extent of digitization in oil and gas supply chains, we first need to
consider the definitions of a few terms associated with the concept of digitization.
These definitions are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Concepts and definitions related to digitization
Concepts
Definition
Digitization
“The economic and social transformation triggered by the
massive adoption of digital technologies to generate, process,
share and transact information”[12]
Digital supply
chain management
Digital supply chain management is a process of the
delivering the products from origin to destination by
electronic means. Key dimensions for digital supply chain
management are digital planning, digital supply, digital
manufacturing and digital logistics; and key ingredients are
supply chain integration, automation, reconfiguration and
analytics [19]
Supply chain
visibility
“The identity, location and status of entities transiting the
supply chain, captured in timely messages about events, along
with the planned and actual dates/times for these events.” [14]
Interorganizational
systems
“Interorganizational systems are information and
communication technology-based systems that transcend
legal enterprise boundaries” [19]
Supply chain
agility
“The ability of an organization to thrive in a continuously
changing, unpredictable business environment, with speed
and flexibility” [17]
Supply chain
responsiveness
“A network of firms that is capable of creating wealth to its
stakeholders in a competitive environment by reacting
quickly and cost effectively to changing market
requirements” [18]
Digital ecosystem
“A digital ecosystem is an interdependent group of
enterprises, people and/or things that share standardized
digital platforms for a mutually beneficial purpose (such as
commercial gain, innovation or common interest). Digital
ecosystems enable you to interact with customers, partners,
and adjacent industries even your competition.” [20]
The literature on digitization and supply chain visibility for the oil and gas sector is
scarce and diverse. A clear pathway is needed for evolution towards a highly efficient
Digitization in the Oil and Gas Industry 3
digital ecosystem in the oil and gas industry. Studies on the digitization of supply
chains focus on integrating operational technology systems with information
technology systems using big data [5]. Use of big data and integration of operational
and information technologies are crucial for digitization of supply chains [6].
Digital transformation projects can take considerable effort and time. For instance, a
supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) project undertaken by Encana in
the United States was undertaken over a 12-year period [1]. As an upstream company,
Encana senior managers had sought different alternatives for responding to price
volatility and reducing production costs by seeking unconventional sources of natural
gas. This project helped Encana improve supply chain visibility by embedding digital
technologies to integrate its data and establish new information systems policies.
Although the upstream oil companies are not new to big data analytics, most of
them are in preliminary stages of implementing relevant technologies [8]. Companies
are benefitting from the sensors embedded in their drilling operations and are working
on integrating this data with their supply chain information systems. Oil and gas
companies need to carry out a gap analysis before investing on digitization.
Furthermore, these companies need to create new strategies to utilize the big data for
their decision making processes.
The extent of digitization within individual companies influences the digitization
within the overall supply chain. Furthermore, supply chain collaboration between the
companies also influences and improves companies’ performances [21]. Supply
chain collaboration is also directly linked with interorganizational dependencies, as
past collaboration activities can be used as a basis for defining the dependencies.
Among the different types of interorganizational dependencies, sequential and
reciprocal dependencies matter for oil and gas companies. If companies in a supplier-
customer relation agree to use a specific resource and if the product of one is a raw
material for the other company, the arrangement is described as sequential
dependency. In such a dependency, the technologies of the supplier and customer
companies need to be linked. In reciprocal dependency, the resources are shared in no
particular sequential order and in a many-to-many type of dependency to increase
collaborative advantage [16]. Oil and gas companies can share onshore and offshore
facilities and logistics infrastructure. The extent of dependency can vary across
different countries and practices are not consistent throughout the globe. Furthermore,
these companies are familiar with linked and complex technologies for information
sharing. Thus the interorganizational dependency of the oil and gas companies is
sequential or reciprocal varying across different continents throughout the world.
When discussing the levels of digitization in companies in the oil and gas industry as
a whole, we need to consider upstream and downstream operations separately. Due to
narrower profit margins and direct relation with end customers, downstream oil and
gas companies have started using digitization strategies earlier than the upstream
companies. The past, present and potential future of digitization in oil and gas are
summarized in Table 2.
4 <Authors>
Table2. Developments in digitization for upstream and downstream companies (Based on [2])
Upstream
Downstream
Past
Information technology has
traditionally not been seen as an
essential element of operations.
Sensors available but information
stored in discrete units
Present
Developing powerful new
capabilities to benefit from smarter
exploration, easier capture, safer
operations and much better utilized
labour
Embedded smart sensors in
vessels, tanks, compressors, and
turbines send real-time data to
control rooms in which a handful
of experts can monitor processes
and provide diagnostics
Future
Dealing with fluid conditions.
Tracking the operations to increase
operator safety
Connecting biometric data to
improve operator safety and in
enabling intelligent materials
movement within facilities
3 Supply Chain Visibility in the Oil and Gas Industry
The aim of digitization projects is ultimately to improve supply chain visibility. Oil
and gas companies need to set the goal as virtualization of a supply chain with the
following attributes [15]:
• Complete horizontal integration in which data from feedstock to product trading
are integrated
• Achieving strategic fit through convergence in strategy, planning and scheduling
• Modularity to enable flexibility in implementation stage
• Scalability so that the applications are suitable for the most simple or complex
supply chains
• Interactivity for collecting effective customer feedback
• Real time optimization speed with direct links to online plant optimization
Supply chain visibility increases if the company has more control on its supply
chain. Fully integrated companies have better control over their supply chains and
access to customer feedback [11]. This feedback in turn can influence the quality of
their upstream processes. The major Norwegian oil company, Statoil, considered
outsourcing five processes: routing of supply vessels, daily coordination of the flow
of supplies, performance evaluation of suppliers and logistics providers, problem
solving and conflict negotiation and influencing and improving the supply chain [4].
They used transactional cost analysis to understand the effects of outsourcing each of
these processes and found that only outsourcing the routing of supply vessels generate
a substantial advantage. Although by outsourcing the company can concentrate on its
core competencies, it stood to lose visibility into transaction-specific data as well as
control over its supply chain.
Digitization in the Oil and Gas Industry 5
Supply chain visibility is closely linked with the agility and competitiveness of
companies. Lean processes create agility and companies need to reduce waste in their
operations to be lean [3]. Agile companies outperform others and thus gain
competitive advantage.
Companies in the oil and gas industry employ various software packages for
managing their supply chain. However, many of the companies that can provide these
supply chain management programs focuses only on supply chain management
(SCM), and thus, substantial effort is needed by the oil and gas companies to integrate
these SCM programs with their ERPs. Furthermore, only a few of the SCM software
companies can accommodate real-time dynamic information such as in Vehicle
Routing and Scheduling (VRS) programs. Hence for an end to end, holistic and real-
time digital ecosystem oil and gas companies need to integrate all of their software
packages. It becomes an imperative issue for an oil and gas company to choose the
best software that is suitable for its supply chain. As per Modern Materials
Handling[22] and Compare Business Products[23], the current capabilities of the
major software companies are shown in Fig1. SAP and Oracle are the two companies
that can provide all the services; however choices could differ for different cost,
performance or timing requirements for oil and gas companies
Fig1. Capabilities of major software companies in terms of SCM, ERP and VRS
4 Discussions
Digitization forms the backbone for supply chain visibility improvement efforts. As a
company invests more in digitization, it starts to get greater insight from its
SAP
Oracle
SCM
ERP VRS
Manhattan
HighJump
JDA
Epicor
Infor
Microsoft
Lawson
QAD
SAGE
IFS
Consona
Descartes
Fleetmatics
Geonconcept
Leanlogistics
MercuryGate
Ortec
IBM
Basware
PTC
SciQuest
Kewill
GTNexus
6 <Authors>
operations. When the company extends its visibility through all operations and
removes wasteful information, it starts to become more agile and thus it gains greater
ability to respond to the variations in its operations. Supply chain agility and
responsiveness are affected by the achievable extent of visibility. In latecomer
industries such as oil and gas these changes have been gradual. However, the
evolution towards digital ecosystems requires greater intensiveness in digitization
efforts among all key players in the supply chain. Fig 2 summarizes these stages in
digital evolution. Stage 1 involves digitization efforts and resultant visibility. Stage 2
involves the achievement of agility and responsiveness. Stage 1 and Stage 2 do not
represent single instances in time as digitization efforts continue over the period of
years and have changing influence on Stage 2. Stage 3 involves a final stage of
evolution into a digital ecosystem through the contributions of all relevant players in
the supply chain.
Fig2. Supply chain evolution toward digital ecosystem for oil and gas industry
The first author’s industry experience and the previous business and academic
literature suggest that the oil and gas industry has begun major digitization initiatives.
These efforts are far more advanced in the downstream context.
5 Conclusions
Oil and gas companies have understood the importance of digitization and are
improving their supply chains by employing digital strategies, using smart
manufacturing, designing digital business models and using data analytics as core
competencies. A majority of these companies are only at the first stage of the
evolution toward a digital ecosystem and are working on their visibility improvement
efforts. These companies need to augment their efficiency in exchanging information,
increase transparency and remove the friction in their information flow. The
Digitization
Supply Chain
Agility
Supply Chain
Visibility
Supply Chain
Responsiveness
Digital
Ecosystem
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Digitization in the Oil and Gas Industry 7
development of flexible digital ecosystems involves companies which employ
virtualized processes, virtualized customer interfaces, and collaborate with other firms
in the industry. However, there is no one-size-fits-all solution for oil and gas supply
chains across the world with the increasing speed of digitization and the nature of
technologies adopted. Academic researchers have a role to play here in observing and
analyzing current efforts, participating in the development of innovative solutions and
informing industry of successes, failures and contextual drivers.
References
1. Kohli, R., Johnson, S.: Digital Transformation In Latecomer Industries: CIO and CEO
Leadership Lessons From Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. MIS Quarterly Executive 10,
141—157 (2011)
2. Strategy&, http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/reports/industry4.0
3. Yusuf, Y.Y., Gunasekaran, A., Musa, A., Dauda, M., El-Berishy, N.M., Cang, S.: A
Relational Study of Supply Chain Agility, Competitiveness and Business Performance in
the Oil and Gas Industry. International Journal of Production Economics 147, 531—543
(2014)
4. Aas, B., Buvik, A., Cakic, D.: Outsourcing of Logistics Activities in a Complex Supply
Chain: A Case Study from the Norwegian Oil and Gas Industry. International Journal of
Procurement Management, 1, 280—296 (2008)
5. Tapping The Power of Big Data for the Oil and Gas Industry, IBM Company (2013)
6. Hamzeh, H.: Application of Big Data in Petroleum Industry (2016)
7. Forbes Logistics and Transportation,
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinomarah/2016/11/17/digitization-in-supply-chain-
five-key-trends/
8. Baaziz, A., Quoniam, L.: How to Use Big Data Technologies to Optimize Operations in
Upstream Petroleum Industry. International Journal of Innovation 1, 19—25 (2013)
9. Henriette, E., Feki, M., Boughzala I.: The Shape of Digital Transformation: A Systematic
Literature Review. MCIS 2015 Proceedings 10, 1—13 (2015)
10. Trkman, P., Stemberger, M., Jakli, J., Groznik, A., Indihar, M., Temberger, S.: Process
Approach to Supply Chain Integration. Supply Chain Management: An International
Journal 12, 116—128 (2007)
11. Chima, C., Hills, D.: Supply-Chain Management Issues in the Oil and Gas Industry. Journal
of Business & Economics Research (JBER) 5, 27—36 (2011)
12. Katz, R, Koutroumpis, P., Callorda F.M.: Using a Digitization Index to Measure the
Economic and Social Impact of Digital Agendas. Info 16, 32—44 (2014)
13. Xue, L., Zhang, C., Ling, H., Zhao, X.: Risk Mitigation in Supply Chain Digitization:
System Modularity and Information Technology Governance. Journal of Management
Information Systems, 30:1, 325—352 (2013)
14. Francis, V.: Supply Chain Visibility: Lost In Translation?. Supply Chain Management: An
International Journal 13,180—184 (2008)
15. Lasschuit, W., Thijssen, N.: Supporting Supply Chain Planning and Scheduling Decisions
in the Oil and Chemical Industry. Computers and Chemical Engineering 28, 863—870
(2004)
16. Kumar, K., Van Dissel, H.G.: Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and
Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems. MIS Quarterly 20, 279—300 (1996)
8 <Authors>
17. Prater, E., Biehl, M., Smith, M. A.: International Supply Chain Agility — Tradeoffs
between Flexibility and Uncertainty. International Journal of Operations & Production
Management 21, 823—839 (2001)
18. Gunasekaran, A., Lai, K.H., Cheng, T.C.E: Responsive Supply Chain: A Competitive
Strategy in a Networked Economy. Omega 36, 549—564 (2008)
19. ATKearney,
http://www.atkearney.com.au/documents/10192/6500433/Digital+Supply+Chains.pdf/
20. Gartner, http://www.gartner.com/technology/topics/digital-ecosystems.jsp
21. Cao, M., Zhang, Q.: Supply Chain Collaboration: Impact on Collaborative Advantage and
Firm Performance. Journal of Operations Management 29, 163--180 (2011)
22. Modern Materials Handling,
http://www.mmh.com/article/top_20_software_suppliers
23. Enterprise Innovation,
https://www.enterpriseinnovation.net/files/whitepapers/top_10_erp_vendors.pdf