ArticlePDF Available

Satellite tracking and stable isotope analysis highlight differential recruitment among foraging areas in green turtles


Abstract and Figures

Identifying links between breeding and non-breeding sites in migratory animals is an important step in understanding their ecology. Recognising the relative importance of foraging areas and ascertaining site-specific levels of recruitment can provide fundamental and applied insights. Here, satellite telemetry and the stable isotope ratios (δ¹³C, δ¹⁵N and δ³⁴S) of 230 green turtles Chelonia mydas from a regionally important rookery in northern Cyprus were employed to evaluate the relative importance of 4 foraging areas. A preliminary analysis of stable isotope ratios suggested that a major foraging area had been missed through satellite telemetry as a large proportion of turtles had isotope ratios that did not correspond to sites previously identified. Stable isotope ratios were then employed to select 5 turtles to be fitted with platform terminal transmitters in 2015. All 5 turtles were subsequently tracked to the same location, Lake Bardawil in Egypt. Serially collected tissue samples from 45 females, ranging over 2 to 4 breeding seasons, suggested that foraging site fidelity was very common, with 82% of females exhibiting extremely high temporal consistency in isotope ratios. Quantifying fidelity allowed an evaluation of foraging area-specific contributions to each breeding cohort over the past 2 decades and demonstrated that recruitment was unequal among sites, and dynamic over time, with Egypt now currently the major contributor to the nesting aggregation. This work demonstrates the utility of stable isotope analysis to elucidate the spatial ecology of cryptic taxa and illustrates how more robust baselines can be assembled against which to measure the success of future marine conservation initiatives.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Mar Ecol Prog Ser
Vol. 582: 201–214, 2017 Published November 6
Many species undertake migrations, including on -
to genetic shifts between successive life-stages (Bol ten
et al. 1998, Reich et al. 2007) or regular seasonal (Hob-
son & Schell 1998) and reproductive migrations
(Rubenstein & Hobson 2004). Philopatric species (ani-
mals that return to their natal region to breed) often
form genetically distinct populations (Greenwood
1980, Meylan et al. 1990), but not all individuals from
the breeding population necessarily migrate to the
same non-breeding site (Webster et al. 2002, Bolker et
al. 2007). Identifying these links be tween breeding
and non-breeding sites is a priority for species conser-
vation, but tracking migrating animals can be difficult.
Large terrestrial species can often be observed or
tracked using extrinsic markers (Rubenstein & Hobson
2004), although this is difficult with smaller, more
vagile species because detectability is low. Tracking
animals in the marine environment is especially chal-
lenging as animals can move across great distances.
Satellite telemetry has the ability to provide real-time
© The authors 2017. Open Access under Creative Commons by
Attribution Licence. Use, distribution and reproduction are un -
restricted. Authors and original publication must be credited.
Publisher: Inter-Research ·
*Corresponding author:
Satellite tracking and stable isotope analysis
highlight differential recruitment among
foraging areas in green turtles
Phil J. Bradshaw1, Annette C. Broderick1, Carlos Carreras1, 2, Richard Inger1, 3,
Wayne Fuller1,4, Robin Snape1, Kimberley L. Stokes1, Brendan J. Godley1,3,*
1Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK
2Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics and IRBio, University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
3Environmental and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK
4Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Near East University, Nicosia, Mersin 10, N. Cyprus
ABSTRACT: Identifying links between breeding and non-breeding sites in migratory animals is
an important step in understanding their ecology. Recognising the relative importance of foraging
areas and ascertaining site-specific levels of recruitment can provide fundamental and applied
insights. Here, satellite telemetry and the stable isotope ratios (δ13C, δ15N and δ34S) of 230 green
turtles Chelonia mydas from a regionally important rookery in northern Cyprus were employed to
evaluate the relative importance of 4 foraging areas. A preliminary analysis of stable isotope ratios
suggested that a major foraging area had been missed through satellite telemetry as a large pro-
portion of turtles had isotope ratios that did not correspond to sites previously identified. Stable
isotope ratios were then employed to select 5 turtles to be fitted with platform terminal transmit-
ters in 2015. All 5 turtles were subsequently tracked to the same location, Lake Bardawil in Egypt.
Serially collected tissue samples from 45 females, ranging over 2 to 4 breeding seasons, suggested
that foraging site fidelity was very common, with 82% of females exhibiting extremely high tem-
poral consistency in isotope ratios. Quantifying fidelity allowed an evaluation of foraging area -
specific contributions to each breeding cohort over the past 2 decades and demonstrated that
recruitment was unequal among sites, and dynamic over time, with Egypt now currently the major
contributor to the nesting aggregation. This work demonstrates the utility of stable isotope analy-
sis to elucidate the spatial ecology of cryptic taxa and illustrates how more robust baselines can be
assembled against which to measure the success of future marine conservation initiatives.
KEY WORDS: Migration · Foraging · Fidelity · Recruitment · Chelonia mydas · Marine turtles
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 582: 201–214, 2017
insight into animal movements, including the large
seasonal migrations of marine megavertebrates (Hart
& Hyrenbach 2009, Block et al. 2011, Jeffers & Godley
2016), identify stock connectivity (Bonfil et al. 2005,
Heide-Jørgensen & Laidre 2006, Zerbini et al. 2006)
and guide the implementation of marine protected ar-
eas (Scott et al. 2012, Schofield et al. 2013, Revuelta et
al. 2015) and time-area closures (Shillinger et al. 2008).
Nevertheless, satellite telemetry is expensive and can
entail direct costs to the study animals, and therefore,
sample size is often limited (Wilson & McMahon 2006,
Godley et al. 2008). However, the satellite data from a
few individuals can be scaled-up to infer habitat use
at a population level through the use of forensic
chemical techniques such as stable isotope analysis
(Hobson 2007, Jaeger et al. 2010, Zbinden et al. 2011,
Robinson et al. 2016).
Stable isotope analysis (SIA) utilises the stable iso-
tope ratios in the tissue of an animal to evaluate its
resource use and migratory origin (Newsome et al.
2007, Hobson et al. 2010). The isotopic composition of
a consumer’s tissue reflects that of its diet after
undergoing a predictable trophic enrichment (Gra-
ham et al. 2010), providing a natural intrinsic tag that
can link an animal to a location (Hobson 2007). The
time period over which the diet is assimilated de -
pends on the tissue-specific turn-over rates, and
meta bolically active tissues can be selected depend-
ent upon the time frame to be studied (Reich et al.
2008, Hobson et al. 2010). Most studies to date have
employed the stable isotope ratios of carbon (13C:12C
or δ13C) and nitrogen (15N:14N or δ15N) as dietary trac-
ers because these elements are informative about
foraging site location and the trophic level of the con-
sumer (Peterson & Fry 1987, Hobson 1999). Carbon
stable isotopes of a consumer reflect those of the pri-
mary producer as little fractionation occurs through
successive trophic levels (~1‰) (DeNiro & Epstein
1978). More specifically to the marine environment,
δ13C can exhibit several strong spatial gradients re -
lating to mean temperature and salinity because
these factors influence primary production. In gen-
eral, δ13C values increase from higher to lower lati-
tudes, as well as from oceanic to neritic ecosystems,
and from pelagic to benthic food sources (Hobson
2007, Koch 2007). The δ15N of a primary producer can
be strongly influenced by the mode of nitrogen
cycling (Hobson et al. 2010), and substantial trophic
discrimination (~3.4‰) (DeNiro & Epstein 1981) en -
ables assumptions to be drawn concerning the con-
sumer’s trophic level (Hobson & Welch 1992, Godley
et al. 1998). Nitrogen cycling in coastal ecosystems is
strongly influenced by anthropogenic inputs of nitro-
gen. Sources such as agricultural fertilisers and ani-
mal or human waste can elevate nitrate levels, result-
ing in an increase in δ15N of particulate organic mat-
ter that is reflected within the food web (Vander
Zanden et al. 2005, Kendall et al. 2007).
Isotopic tracking at finer regional scales can be
confounded in situations where there is ambiguity in
source isotopic compositions (i.e. multiple geographi-
cally distinct areas share a similar isotopic profile), as
discrete isotopic differences may not exist (Hobson
2007). In these circumstances, an additional isotope
or trace element can be incorporated to supplement
the carbon and nitrogen isotopes and possibly estab-
lish discrete differences among sites. The stable iso-
tope ratio of sulphur (34S:32S or δ34S), for example, is
particularly useful in differentiating be tween inshore
and offshore feeding populations (Barros et al. 2010)
and ontogenetic dietary shifts associated with succes-
sional developmental habitats (Car dona et al. 2009).
Sulphur isotopes make ideal indicators for identifying
the source of primary production as very little trophic
discrimination occurs (Koch 2007). Sulphur is consid-
ered to truly discriminate between neritic and oceanic
ecosystems as phytoplankton and most macroalgae
assimilate marine sulphate and are characterised by
δ34S values of ~21‰ (Cardona et al. 2009). Conversely,
benthic primary producers such as seagrasses have a
lower and more variable δ34S value because 34S from
sulphide-rich sediments is oxidised back to a sulphate
within rhizospheres before being taken up by rooted
plants (Fry et al. 1982, Peterson & Fry 1987, Moncreiff
& Sullivan 2001).
There are some marine isoscapes (spatially explicit
predictions for baseline isotope values) available, but
these are generally of too coarse a scale to infer the
foraging site of a species at a regional level (Hobson
et al. 2010, Somes et al. 2010, McMahon et al. 2013).
Thus, isotopic approaches to infer foraging area are
often validated through the isotopic composition of
satellite-tracked individuals (e.g. Jaeger et al. 2010,
Zbinden et al. 2011, Seminoff et al. 2012) that can
then be used to create species-specific isoscapes,
such as those developed for the loggerhead turtle
Caretta caretta (Ceriani et al. 2014, Vander Zanden
et al. 2015). However, a primary caveat of integrating
SIA with satellite telemetry is the effective time lag
between these techniques; SIA records the isotopic
re gime prior to tissue sampling, whilst satellite tele -
metry tracks the animal after transmitter attachment
(Seminoff et al. 2012). Therefore, it is important to
assess the foraging site fidelity of the study species
before assuming that the isotopic composition of the
tracked animal was assimilated at the finally deter-
Bradshaw et al.: Differential recruitment of green turtles
mined foraging area (e.g. Vander Zanden et al. 2010,
Tucker et al. 2014).
Here, we set out to fully categorise the foraging
areas utilised by a green turtle Chelonia mydas pop-
ulation that has been the subject of long-term indi-
vidual-based research (Stokes et al. 2014). Extensive
satellite tracking has identified several key foraging
sites for this population (Godley et al. 2002, Stokes et
al. 2015), and repeat tracking of a small sample sug-
gested that they exhibit fidelity to these sites (Broder-
ick et al. 2007). We specifically set out to address 4
main research aims: (1) to infer the proportion of the
nesting population that forage at each identified site,
(2) to quantify foraging site fidelity among adult
females, (3) to assess recruitment from each foraging
area and (4) to evaluate the effectiveness of stable
isotope ratios in monitoring the relative importance
of foraging areas over time.
Study site
Alagadi is a double coved beach that stretches
along approximately 2 km of shoreline and is cur-
rently the second largest green turtle nesting area
in Cyprus, and the fifth most important regionally
(Stokes et al. 2015). Long-term monitoring, including
saturation tagging and nest protection, was initiated
at Alagadi in 1992 with a mean ± SD of 16 ± 11.3
females nesting annually (range = 3–30, from 1993 to
2000). Since 2008, the number of females nesting
each year has in creased rapidly to 46.5 ± 2.4 (range =
23–86, 2008 to 2015).
Satellite telemetry
Between 1998 and 2011, 23 Platform Terminal
Transmitters (PTTs; see Supplement 1 at www. int-
res. com/ articles/ suppl/ m582 p201_ supp. pdf) were at -
tached to 21 female green turtles (Godley et al. 2002,
Broderick et al. 2007, Stokes et al. 2015) and 2 males
(Fig. 1; Wright et al. 2012). All PTTs were attached on
nesting beaches in northern Cyprus using standard
protocols set out in Godley et al. (2002), with satellite
data processing and conclusive endpoint destina-
tions as determined by Stokes et al. (2015). Satellite
tracking identified 4 distinct regions as important for-
aging areas for Mediterranean green turtles: (1) sev-
eral sites around Turkey and Cyprus (hereafter
Turkey-Cyprus); (2) the Gulf of Sirte and the Libya−
Tunisia border (hereafter West Libya); (3) the Gulf of
Bomba (in eastern Libya); and (4) Egypt (Fig. 1, Stokes
et al. (2015)). Subsequent to a preliminary analysis of
the stable isotope ratios, we targeted 5 specific
females during the 2015 breeding season for the
attachment of Wildlife Computer SPOT-293A tags
(see Supplement 1).
Fig. 1. Post-nesting green turtle satellite tracks from Cyprus to 4 broad-scale foraging areas: Turkey-Cyprus (TC), which
combines several foraging sites clustered around Turkey and Cyprus; West Libya (WL), which combines 2 sites (the Gulf of
Sirte and a site on the Libyan–Tunisian border); the Gulf of Bomba (Bo) in east Libya; and Egypt (Eg), which combines 2 sites
(Gulf of Arab and Lake Bardawil). Light grey tracks: individuals satellite tracked between 1998 and 2011 from Stokes et al.
(2015) and Wright et al. (2012); thick black dashed track: previously unpublished male tracked to southern Cyprus (PTT =
52818); black tracks: individuals satellite tracked in 2015 to Lake Bardawil, Egypt. Numbers indicate how many individuals
were satellite tracked to each foraging area. Pie charts segmented to represent the proportion of individuals assigned to each
foraging area based on their stable isotope composition from the 2015 analysis. The black section of each pie is equal to the
proportion of the 165 turtles assigned to that specific foraging area
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 582: 201–214, 2017
Tissue sample collection
A total of 323 tissue samples were collected from
230 green turtles on Alagadi beach in northern
Cyprus (35° 19’ 56.17” N; 33° 28’ 57.59” E) between
2006 and 2015. Tissue samples were collected from
post-nesting females during the breeding season
(mid-May until end of July), with the exception of 1
male encountered at Alagadi beach still coupled to
the emergent female (the other satellite-tracked
male was not tissue sampled; see Supplement 1). Tis-
sue samples comprising of a small epidermal biopsy
(<0.5 cm2) were taken from the trailing edge of the
fore flipper and stored in 96% ethanol until sample
preparation. All turtles were individually marked
using both external flipper tags and Passive Inte-
grated Transponder (PIT) tags (Stokes et al. 2014).
Stable isotope analysis
We analysed the stable isotopes of carbon, nitrogen
and sulphur from green turtle epidermal tissue sam-
ples (Seminoff et al. 2006, Reich et al. 2008) following
a standard protocol (Ceriani et al. 2014), with the
exception that samples were dried at 60°C for 48 to
72 h. Approximately 0.7 ± 0.1 mg of each sample was
weighed into a tin capsule, sealed and analysed for
carbon and nitrogen. Isotope analysis was performed
at the Stable Isotope Facility of the Environment and
Sustainability Institute (ESI; University of Exeter,
Penryn Campus) via a continuous flow isotope ratio
mass spectrometer (CF-IRMS) using a Sercon Inte-
gra2 stable isotope analyser. A greater sample mass
was required for sulphur isotope analysis, with approx-
imately 5 ± 0.5 mg of sample sealed into a tin capsule
together with a small amount (<1 mg) of vanadium
pentoxide to aid combustion of the larger sample quan-
tity. The analysis of sulphur isotopes was conducted
at Elemtex in Launceston, UK using an ANCA SL
attached to a Sercon 2020 CF-IRMS.
Stable isotope ratios are expressed using a conven-
tional notation as δvalues defined as parts per thou-
sand or per mil (‰) according to the following equa-
tion as per Bond & Hobson (2012):
δX= [(Rsample/Rstandard) − 1] (1)
where Xis 15N, 13Cor34S; Rsample is the corresponding
ratio of the heavier to lighter isotopes (15N:14N; 13C:12C
or 34S:32S); and Rstandard is relative to the international
standards of atmospheric nitrogen, Pee Dee Belemnite
and Vienna Cañon Diablo Trolite, respectively. The
standard deviations of the laboratory refer ence materi-
als among runs for δ15N were 0.18 ‰ for IAEA N1 (δ15N
= +0.4 ‰) and 0.25‰ for IAEA N2 (δ15N = + 0.25‰); for
δ13C they were 0.10 ‰ for IAEA CH6 (δ13C = −10.45‰),
0.16‰ for IAEA Isvec (δ13C = −46.6‰) and 0.19‰ for
IAEA nbs-18 (δ13C = −5.01‰); and for δ34S they were
0.32‰ for IAEA S1 (δ34S = −0.3‰), 0.29 ‰ for IAEA S2
(δ34S = +22.7‰), 0.42 ‰ for USGS 42 (δ34S=+7.8‰)
and 0.26 ‰ for USGS 43 (δ34S = +10.21 ‰).
Selecting samples
Tissue samples were available for some females
over multiple breeding seasons, and these were em-
ployed to quantify foraging site fidelity. However, to
avoid pseudoreplication when inferring foraging area
use at a population scale, we selected a single epider-
mal tissue sample for each turtle. A more de fined cri-
teria was employed for selecting tissue samples for
satellite-tracked turtles to ameliorate the time lag be-
tween satellite telemetry and SIA. For satellite-tracked
turtles, we selected tissue samples using the following
criteria in order of preference: (1) sample mass avail-
able to analyse all 3 isotopes; (2) sample collected dur-
ing the breeding season subsequent to satellite track-
ing, (3) sample collected during the PTT deployment
or (4) sample collected temporally closest to when the
turtle was satellite tracked (see Supplement 1). No tis-
sue samples were available for 4 satellite-tracked tur-
tles, and so these were omitted from this study (see
Supplement 1). When multiple tissue samples were
available for turtles that were not satellite tracked, we
selected the most recent sample available to minimise
any temporal variation in baseline isotopic values that
might occur over long time frames.
Control of possible methodological biases
To evaluate additional sources of variation, we ana -
lysed 20 paired samples to determine if lipid extraction
was necessary (Post et al. 2007). Paired t-tests were
conducted on lipid extracted and non-lipid extracted
samples (see Supplement 2) with no significant dif-
ferences found for δ15N values (paired t-test, t19 =
1.70, p = 0.11; Fig. S2a). Statistically significant dif-
ferences were detected between paired samples for
δ13C (paired t-test, t19 = −4.0, p < 0.001; Fig. S2b), but
the mean difference in δ13C due to lipid extraction
(mean = −0.2 ‰, range = −0.3 to 0.1‰) was judged
biologically irrelevant considering the mean differ-
ence in δ13C among sites (1.7‰). Thus, lipid extrac-
tion was deemed unnecessary.
Bradshaw et al.: Differential recruitment of green turtles 205
Some disparity exists within the literature concern-
ing the effect that a >70% ethanol concentration can
have on the isotopic values of stored tissue samples
(Hobson et al. 1997, Tillberg et al. 2006, Barrow et al.
2008, Kaufman et al. 2014). Therefore, as tissue sam-
ples for this study were stored in a 96% ethanol con-
centration, we conducted paired t-tests on tissue sam-
ples collected simultaneously from 33 individuals and
stored in 96% and 70% ethanol concentration for up
to 5 mo (see Supplement 3). We found no significant
differences between samples (δ15N, paired t-test, t32 =
0.67, p = 0.51, Fig. S3a; δ13C values, paired t-test, t32 =
−0.13, p = 0.90, Fig. S3b), meaning that no consistent
enrichment or depletion was observed. Possible sources
of variation in δ34S values were not investigated due
to limitations in tissue sample availability.
Assigning turtles to the foraging areas
Nominal assignment approaches are commonly
used to predict the foraging locations of a population
using stable isotope signatures calibrated from the
satellite telemetry of a subset of individuals (Wunder
2012). We broadly followed previously described
methods (Ceriani et al. 2012, Pajuelo et al. 2012, Van-
der Zanden et al. 2015) to predict foraging area using
a discriminant function analysis (see Supplement 4),
with a secondary classification method as per Zbin -
den et al. (2011) to distinguish between 2 sites that
were isotopically similar.
Investigating foraging site fidelity
Evidence for foraging site fidelity has already been
demonstrated for this population of green turtles
through the repeat satellite tracking of 3 individuals
(Broderick et al. 2007). To further investigate forag-
ing site fidelity among a broader sample, we used
serially collected samples from 45 females, with 33
sampled over 2 seasons, 9 sampled over 3 seasons
and 3 sampled over 4 seasons. Samples for 42 of the
females were collected from consecutive breeding
seasons including all females sampled for >2 sea-
sons. The other 3 females were sampled for 2 breed-
ing seasons, but these were not consecutive as they
were not sampled for a single intermediate breeding
season. To investigate fidelity, we used a repeatabil-
ity analysis to test the temporal consistency in isotope
ratios with the identity of the turtle as the grouping
factor and the predicted foraging area as a covariate
(see Supplement 5).
Evaluating foraging area-specific annual
contributions to the breeding cohort
If foraging site fidelity is typical within the Alagadi
population, then the individually based nesting data
collected at Alagadi since 1992 (Stokes et al. 2014)
can be used to retrospectively evaluate the foraging
area-specific contributions to each breeding cohort
based on the turtle’s unique identification. Although
the analysis is limited to nesting females that were
satellite tracked, or had their foraging area inferred
through SIA, some of these females have nested con-
sistently since 1992, and their unique identity can
therefore be used to gain an insight into foraging
area dynamics prior to the initiation of the tissue sam-
pling regime. For each year that a turtle nested, it
was included as a contributor from its respective for-
aging area, and therefore, some females are repre-
sented in multiple seasons.
A broad range in stable isotope values were found
(δ15N = +2.0‰ to +13.0‰, δ13C = −16.3‰ to −4.9
and δ34S = +0.2 ‰ to + 20.2‰; Fig. 2), and pairwise
comparisons showed all pairs of isotopes to be signif-
icantly correlated (Pearson’s product-moment corre-
lation coefficient, p < 0.001 in all cases, δ13C and
δ15N, r = −0.26; δ15N and δ34S, r = 0.23; δ13C and δ34S,
r = −0.75, see Supplement 6). Turtles tracked to
Bomba exhibited high δ13C values and low δ34S val-
ues, whereas the turtles tracked to Egypt had high
δ15N values compared to the other foraging areas.
Turtles tracked to Turkey-Cyprus and West Libya
were nearly isotopically indistinguishable in terms of
δ13C and δ15N, but individuals from Turkey-Cyprus
exhibited higher δ34S values compared to those from
West Libya, providing isotopic differentiation be -
tween these sites (Figs. 3 & 4).
Inferring foraging area use
The initial composition of the data, validated by the
19 turtles satellite tracked before 2015, strongly sug-
gested that the pre-defined foraging areas did not
fully characterise the isotope ratios of the turtle
population (Fig. 2). Thus, we hypothesised that a for-
aging area had been missed, or under-represented,
through previous satellite tracking effort.
To substantiate this hypothesis, we conducted a
preliminary discriminant analysis using δ13C and δ15N
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 582: 201–214, 2017
values to obtain prediction probabilities for turtles
that might forage in the area not previously charac-
terised. We selected 3 turtles with isotope ratios cor-
responding to this uncalibrated isospace, in addition
to the 19 satellite-tracked turtles, to calibrate a dis-
criminant analysis and predict the putative foraging
area for 181 turtles (see Table S2 in Supplement 4 &
Supplement 7). We then produced a list of 48 turtles
that were likely (at >80% probability) to forage in the
isotopically uncharacterised foraging area (Fig. 2).
This list of 48 turtles was subsequently used during
the 2015 breeding season to select 5 females for PTT
deployment based on their prediction probabilities.
Eight of those 48 turtles nested at Alagadi that sea-
son, of which 6 had a >90% probability of foraging in
the uncharacterised area and were specifically tar-
geted for PTT deployment. On their next successful
nesting attempt, 5 of these 6 turtles were fitted with
PTTs and tracked for 58 to 146 d (mean ± SD = 80.6 ±
37.13; Fig. S1). All 5 turtles were tracked to the same
foraging area, Lake Bardawil in Egypt (Fig. 1; Sup-
plement 1, Fig. S1) where the PTTs then failed, most
likely due to the hypersaline conditions within the
lake as this is a common occurrence among all turtles
tracked to this location (Nada et al. 2013, Kevin Ng
pers. comm.).
Subsequent to the 2015 breeding season, and with
the full isotopic composition of the turtle population
now validated through the satellite telemetry of 23
turtles, we conducted a second discriminant analysis
with the addition of a third stable isotope (δ13C, δ15N
and δ34S). Tissue samples collected in 2015 from not
Tur key Cy p rus
West Libya
−10 − 8 6
Fig. 2. Bivariate plot of δ13C and δ15N values for green turtles
included in the preliminary discriminant analysis. Crosses
represent the mean ± SD of isotopic values for satellite-
tracked turtles used to calibrate each foraging area. Filled
shapes represent turtles satellite tracked to Bomba (n = 7; cir-
cles), Egypt (n = 2; triangles), Turkey-Cyprus (n = 3; squares)
and West Libya (n = 7; diamonds) along with individuals se-
lected to characterise the unidentified foraging area (n = 3; in-
verted triangles). Open circles: individualsof unknownforag-
ing area (n = 183). Note: One data point removed for greater
graph clarity (δ13C < −14‰). G055 highlighted as an isotopic
mismatch; satellite-tracked to West Libya but exhibited an
isotopic signature corresponding to Bomba
δ34S (‰)
Fig. 3. Classification of individuals to Turkey-Cyprus or
West Libya from the combined foraging area TCWL based
on the 95% CI of δ34S values of satellite-tracked turtles used
to calibrate Turkey-Cyprus (n = 3; squares) and West Libya
(n = 6; diamonds); dashed lines: upper and lower CI for
Turkey-Cyprus; dotted lines: upper and lower CI for West
Libya; open circles: turtles to be assigned. Individuals within
the grey overlapping region were unassigned (n = 15); indi-
viduals above the grey region were assigned to Turkey-
Cyprus (n = 11), and those below were assigned to West
Libya (n = 19)
S (‰)
Fig. 4. δ15N and δ34S values for green turtles predicted to
forage in Bomba (n = 22; filled circles), Egypt (n = 65; trian-
gles), Turkey-Cyprus (n = 11; squares), West Libya (n = 19;
diamonds), or an unassigned location (n = 48; open circles).
Ellipses set at 95% CI (total n = 165)
Bradshaw et al.: Differential recruitment of green turtles
previously sampled females (n = 27) and some alter-
nate tissue samples sourced for some females from
other years (n = 21) were incorporated within this
ana lysis, whilst some females (n = 42) from the pre-
liminary analysis were excluded, as the initial sample
mass was not always adequate to analyse the greater
quantity necessary for sulphur; this simultaneously
excluded 1 turtle (G044) satellite tracked to West
Libya (see Table S2 in Supplement 4). Discrete differ-
ences were found in the combined isotopic values
(MANOVA, Pillai’s trace test, F3, 19 = 6.54, p < 0.001),
yet multiple pairwise comparisons conducted with
Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) still
failed to identify discrete differences among all for-
aging areas (Table 1). For this reason, we combined
the 2 foraging areas that were not discretely differen-
tiated (Turkey-Cyprus and West Libya; TCWL) to
establish discrete isotopic differences among 3 groups
(Bomba, Egypt and TCWL; Table 1). With normal dis-
tributions found for the 3 isotopes, and the variance
among foraging areas homo genous, we employed a
linear discriminant function analysis. We used non-
uniform priors using the number of turtles tracked to
each site from the satellite telemetry (Royle & Ruben-
stein 2004, Vander Zanden et al. 2015) and a poste-
rior probability of assign ment set at 80%. The discrim-
inant analysis was evaluated using the leave-one-out
cross validation method with 95.7% of turtles from
the training data correctly reclassified. The putative
foraging area was predicted for 132 of 165 turtles
(80%), with 45 (27%) assigned to the combined for-
aging area of TCWL.
The 45 turtles assigned to TCWL were then sub-
jected to a secondary classification method based on
their δ34S values because this discriminating criterion
showed the greatest statistical differences among
sites (Table 1). The pooled means and 95% confi-
dence intervals (CI) for the turtles satellite tracked to
each foraging area were used to create an overlap in
which turtles could not be reliably assigned to either
foraging area; these were then included with the tur-
tles unassigned from the discriminant analysis. Those
turtles with a δ34S value greater or lower than the
overlap created by the CI were assigned to Turkey-
Cyprus or West Libya, respectively (Fig. 3). The com-
bination of the 2 nominal assignment approaches
resulted in 11 turtles (7%, n = 165) predicted to for-
age in Turkey-Cyprus, 19 (12%) in West Libya, 65
(39%) in Egypt, 22 (13%) in Bomba and a total of 48
remaining unassigned (29%, 33 from the discrimi-
nant function analysis and 15 from the classification
method) (Figs. 1 & 4, Supplement 8).
Foraging site fidelity
The δ13C and δ15N values were remarkably consis-
tent over multiple seasons with highly significant
repeatability estimates (δ15N: R ± SE = 0.65 ± 0.09,
95% CI = 0.46 − 0.79, p = 0.001, Fig. 5a; δ13C: R =
0.74 ± 0.07, 95% CI = 0.58 − 0.84, p = 0.001, Fig. 5b).
The δ15N values were more variable than δ13C values,
with 65% of samples differing by <1 ‰ and 76.7% by
<1.5 ‰ in subsequent sampling, (always 2 yr apart)
within an overall range in δ15N among these females
of 8.8‰. In contrast, 91.7% of the δ13C values dif-
fered by <1 ‰ and 96.7% by <1.5 ‰ within an overall
range of 6.1 ‰. As carbon isotopes are a more accu-
rate predictor for the source of primary production
(Michener & Kaufman 2007), we contrasted the dif-
ference in δ13C among serially collected samples to
the mean difference in δ13C among sites (1.7 ‰). This
gave us a conservative estimate of 82% of females
(37 of the 45 females) remaining site-faithful as these
individuals did not exhibit a difference >1‰ in δ13C
among seasons. Thus, we assumed that foraging site
fidelity is extremely common within this population.
Only 2 females exhibited differences >1.5 ‰ in δ13C
among seasons (4.5%), suggesting that plasticity in
foraging site fidelity does exist, although it is rela-
tively rare (Fig. 5). An isotopic mismatch was also
noted for 1 turtle satellite tracked to West Libya in
2003 because it had isotopic values more suggestive
of the Gulf of Bomba when tissue was sampled dur-
ing the subsequent breeding season (Fig. 2; turtle
G055). However, this turtle appeared to remain faith-
ful to Bomba for the subsequent 2 interbreeding
Foraging areas Nitrogen Carbon Sulphur
Bomba; Egypt < 0.001 0.01 < 0.001
Bomba; Turkey-Cyprus 0.56 <0.001 <0.001
Bomba; West Libya 0.66 <0.001 <0.001
Egypt; Turkey-Cyprus 0.1 0.32 0.04
Egypt; West Libya 0.011 0.36 0.31
Turkey-Cyprus; West Libya 0.98 0.98 0.5
Bomba; Egypt < 0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Bomba; TCWL 0.32 <0.001 <0.001
Egypt; TCWL < 0.001 0.12 0.045
Table 1. Tukey HSD results comparing stable isotope values
in green turtles among (a) the 4 foraging areas and (b) 3 for-
aging areas. TCWL: Turkey-Cyprus and West Libya com-
bined. Significant p-values (p < 0.05) adjusted for multiple
tests in bold
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 582: 201–214, 2017
Evaluating foraging area-specific annual
contributions to the breeding cohort
Foraging site fidelity being typical within this pop-
ulation, we were able to utilise the individually-
based nesting data collected at the breeding study
site since 1992 (Stokes et al. 2014) retrospectively to
evaluate foraging area specific contributions to each
breeding cohort. We found that the contributions to
the annual breeding cohort from each foraging area
were unequal among years (generalised linear
model, GLM, F3,84 = 8.91, p < 0.001) with a general
biannual variation characteristic among foraging
areas (Fig. 6, Supplement 9). The trends identified for
each foraging area suggest that Bomba was histori-
cally the major contributor to the breeding popula-
tion, but recent trends suggest that there has not
been any substantial increase in the number of
females from this site (Fig. 6a). Egypt, and in particu-
lar Lake Bardawil, may have only contributed a few
individuals to each breeding cohort until 2010, but
then the number of females significantly increased
from this site, with the result that Egypt is presently
the single most important foraging area for the Ala-
gadi rookery (Fig. 6b). The trends for Turkey-Cyprus
and West Libya (Fig. 6c & d, respectively) suggest
that these foraging areas only contribute a few indi-
viduals to each breeding cohort, which is in stark
contrast to the inferred importance of these sites from
the satellite telemetry (Fig. 1).
The stable isotope ratios of the study population
have significantly altered our perception of the rela-
tive importance of the 4 foraging areas identified
through satellite telemetry and allowed us to quan-
tify foraging site fidelity and investigate foraging
area dynamics. Based on our experience here, we
advocate the use of SIA prior to, and during, satellite
tracking campaigns and discuss in turn the major
insights that we have gained from the present study.
Selecting the elements for stable isotope analysis
Stable isotopes are now commonly used to track
animal migration across broad spatial scales for
both terrestrial and marine species (Rubenstein &
Hobson 2004, Michener & Kaufman 2007). However,
this study and others (e.g. Tucker et al. 2014) did
Fig. 6. Total number of females nesting at Alagadi (1992−
2015) (grey broken line) with the solid black line showing
foraging area-specific contributions to the breeding cohort
from (a) Bomba, (b) Egypt, (c) Turkey-Cyprus and (d) West
N (‰) differe nces
C (‰) differe nces
δ15N (‰)δ13C (‰)
Fig. 5. Temporal consistency of isotopic values for serially col-
lected tissue samples of green turtles over successive breed-
ing seasons (n = 45) for (a) δ15N and (b) δ13C values. Subplots
represent within individual absolute differences among seri-
ally collected samples using the first sample as a re ference.
Filled circles: Bomba; triangles: Egypt; squares: Turkey-
Cyprus; diamonds: West Libya; open circles: unassigned
Bradshaw et al.: Differential recruitment of green turtles 209
not find discrete isotopic differences among all non-
breeding sites at a regional level given that the 2
most geographically separated foraging areas
(Turkey-Cyprus and West Libya) were the most sim-
ilar for δ13C and δ15N. The predictable increase of
δ13C to wards the lower latitudes (Hobson 2007,
Koch 2007) was confounded as our foraging areas
were located on the north and south continental
faces. Without the addition of the sulphur isotope
ratios, we could not have reliably predicted the for-
aging area for a large proportion of turtles within
this population.
The strong negative correlation found between
δ13C and δ34S was previously undescribed among
sea grass habitats and resulted in sulphur being the
more informative for this study population. Sulphur
was specifically selected for this study because
green turtles are thought to feed predominantly on
seagrasses within the Mediterranean (Cardona et
al. 2010) that derive their nutrients from the marine
sediments as opposed to the open ocean environ-
ment. Benthic macroalgae and seagrasses therefore
can vary considerably among sites because the mar-
ine sedimentary cycle (reviewed by Thode 1991)
produces a wide range in δ34S values as the reduc-
tion of seawater sulphate to H2S in shallow sedi-
ments is influenced by rock type and accretion
rates. Thus, we considered that these factors should
produce variable δ34S values at a local level despite
the similarity in habitat type. However, strong intra-
site differences have been found in the δ34S values
of seagrasses attributed to the interaction of particu-
late organic matter and oxygen levels exuded by
seagrass roots (Oakes & Connolly 2004). Seagrass
samples taken only hundreds of metres apart can
have as great a difference in δ34S as samples taken
thousands of kilometres apart (Connolly et al. 2004).
Nevertheless, such variation over small geographic
scales is incorporated within large megavertebrates,
such as green turtles, that forage over tens of square
kilometres (Broderick et al. 2007, Christiansen et al.
2017), and the diet assimilated provided distinct dif-
ferences among distant foraging areas. In a similar
study, Tucker et al. (2014) did not find δ34S in log-
gerhead turtles Caretta caretta to be informative
because the intra-foraging site variation in δ34S val-
ues encompassed a much greater range (11 to 15
at several sites), effectively masking among-site dif-
ferences. However, loggerhead turtles consume a
broader diet over a greater range of depths than
green turtles, and, importantly, they do not neces-
sarily forage in food webs based on benthic primary
Using stable isotope analysis to
target satellite tracking
The application of SIA validated by satellite tele -
metry is almost routine now when evaluating forag-
ing areas (Rubenstein & Hobson 2004, Hobson et al.
2010), but the SIA is commonly conducted subse-
quent to the satellite telemetry. The present study
has effectively demonstrated that SIA conducted
prior to, or during, satellite telemetry campaigns can
greatly augment the study by providing scientific
guidance to identify specific groups of individuals for
PTT attachment and infer the most likely number of
transmitters necessary to identify isotopically dis-
crete foraging sites.
Assigning turtles to their foraging area
The combined results of the nominal assignment
approaches predicted the foraging areas for 71 % of
the turtles sampled. This provided a sample size of
117 turtles, from the 165 analysed, to assess the rela-
tive importance of the foraging areas using SIA, and
this yielded substantially different results from those
inferred from satellite telemetry (Fig. 1). The satellite
telemetry conducted before 2015 inferred that 65%
of green turtles from northern Cyprus were foraging
in Libya (35% in West Libya and 30% in the Gulf of
Bomba), 22% in Turkey-Cyprus and 13% in Egypt
(Wright et al. 2012, Stokes et al. 2015, authors’ un -
publ. data). In contrast, SIA suggested that 25% for-
aged in Libya (12% in West Libya and 13% in the
Gulf of Bomba), 7% in Turkey-Cyprus and 39% in
Egypt but with 29% undetermined. The difference
be tween these 2 techniques arises from several fac-
tors, including the limited sample size associated
with satellite tracking relative to SIA sampling, inter-
annual variations in the relative contributions from
each foraging area and, most importantly in this case,
the recent demographic shift causing an increase in
turtles recruiting from Lake Bardawil. The observed
differences in results from these techniques under-
line the need to conduct SIA, in addition to satellite
tracking, over sufficient time frames to prevent erro-
neous conclusions because both the relative contri-
butions from foraging areas and baseline isotopic
values are dynamic. These techniques should com-
plement each other, as SIA will never be as accurate
as satellite telemetry but satellite telemetry will
rarely incorporate such robust sample sizes. Thus, a
sustained tissue sampling protocol should be sup-
ported by satellite telemetry as resources permit.
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 582: 201–214, 2017
Ascertaining foraging site fidelity
This study builds upon a growing body of evidence
that green turtles (Broderick et al. 2007, Vander Zan-
den et al. 2013, Shimada et al. 2014, 2016) and other
marine turtle species (Schofield et al. 2010, Thomson
et al. 2012, Tucker et al. 2014, Pajuelo et al. 2016)
show high levels of fidelity to non-breeding sites.
The ability to isotopically track some individuals for
up to 4 breeding seasons, with a temporal frame of
ap proxi mately 2 to 8 yr, presented clear evidence for
a high degree of fidelity to the pre-defined foraging
areas. We consider our estimate of 82% of females
exhibiting fidelity to be conservative as only 2 fe -
males (4.5%) exhibited substantial differences in
δ13C (>1.5 ‰), which would be more indicative of a
move over a broad spatial scale, considering the
mean difference in δ13C among our sites. However,
plasticity does exist, and Stokes et al. (2015) also
noted evidence from satellite telemetry of secondary
movements after turtles had taken up residency, but
these were also relative exceptions (4 individuals out
of a total of 29 tracked conclusively to foraging
grounds). These movements were generally between
neighbouring foraging sites, and in some cases only
temporary, but this suggests that foraging site fidelity
is not hard-wired and is most likely subject to exter-
nal variables such as resource availability.
Monitoring foraging site contribution over time
Significant temporal change in the number of indi-
viduals originating from foraging areas can be in -
formative of foraging area dynamics without the need
to conduct site-based surveys. In this case, the forag-
ing area-specific trends in the annual contribution to
each nesting cohort clearly demonstrate that the in-
crease in the number of females nesting at Alagadi is
primarily being driven by the recruitment of turtles
that forage in Egypt (Lake Bardawil). Several alterna-
tive and not mutually exclusive drivers could result in
such a foraging area-specific increase in re cruitment.
These include (1) an increase in the survival probabili-
ties of juveniles and sub-adults as industrial fisheries
are excluded (Casale 2011, Casale & Heppell 2016), (2)
greater foraging re sources reducing the age to sexual
maturity (Bjorndal et al. 2013), (3) temporal oscillations
in sea surface currents, such as those dictated by the
Cyprus eddy (Zodiatis et al. 2005), that can vary the
distribution of pelagic-stage juveniles and thus the
number of individuals recruiting to each foraging
area (Gaspar et al. 2012, Scott et al. 2014, 2017) or (4) a
shift in the ecological conditions within Lake Bardawil
so that this site now provides a more suitable foraging
resource (El-Bana et al. 2002, Abd Ellah & Hussein
2009, Nada et al. 2013). To expand on this latter hypo -
thesis, evidence suggests that the reopening and on-
going maintenance of the 2 man-made channels in
the western and central part of the lake have signifi-
cantly reduced salinity levels (1970: 100‰, 2012:
46.1‰) (Abd Ellah & Hussein 2009, Nada et al. 2013
and references therein) and allowed Cymo docea no-
dosa, the primary dietary item of the green turtle
within the Mediterranean (Cardona 2010), to colonise
and now dominate the shallow western basin (El-
Bana et al. 2002, Abd Ellah & Hussein 2009). Further
corroboration from satellite tele metry indicates that
the turtles predominately re main within the beds of C.
nodosa (Nada et al. 2013) which suggests that they
might not forage on the Ruppia Cirrhosa that forms
monospecific habitats within the eastern basin, and
the only seagrass re corded within the lake prior to the
reopening of the channels in 1988 (Lipkin 1977, El-
Bana et al. 2002, Abd Ellah & Hussein 2009). Therefore,
Lake Bardawil might provide a new foraging location
as high salinity levels and inadequate forage may
have previously precluded green turtles from this site.
The knowledge that a high proportion of recruits
are originating from a single site is a critical develop-
ment in our understanding of foraging area dynamics.
At present, the conservation efforts undertaken on
the beaches of northern Cyprus have been effective in
increasing the number of hatchlings reaching the wa-
ter (Stokes et al. 2014) with a possible rise in the num-
ber of juveniles reaching a reproductive age. How-
ever, ensuring that the current trends in recruitment
continue may largely depend on the adequate protec-
tion of the turtles foraging within Lake Barda wil, al-
though this might be challenging as some human
turtle conflict has been reported as turtle abundance
increases (Nada et al. 2013). Therefore, stakeholder
discussions and international co-operation are neces-
sary to protect turtles foraging in Egypt in addition to
those from the key recognised sites in Libya, namely
the Gulf of Bomba and the Gulf of Sirte (Casale 2011,
Stokes et al. 2015, Casale & Heppell 2016).
Through the analysis of stable isotopes calibrated
by satellite telemetry, we have answered several
important questions for the conservation of marine
turtles (see Hamann et al. 2010, Rees et al. 2016).
These include identifying and assessing the relative
Bradshaw et al.: Differential recruitment of green turtles
importance of all major foraging sites utilised by
green turtles nesting at Alagadi, quantifying forag-
ing site fidelity and gaining a critical insight into for-
aging area dynamics.
This work builds upon a detailed, long-term moni-
toring programme following a marked population
(e.g. Broderick et al. 2001, 2003, Stokes et al. 2014,
2015) that emphasises the true value that such indi-
vidual-based data can provide. The long-term nesting
data used to evaluate the annual contributions to the
rookery from each foraging area for >2 decades was
pivotal in identifying the substantial increase in the
number of turtles that forage in Lake Bardawil. In turn,
this insight emphasises the importance of Cymodocea
nodosa for this species and the necessity of protecting
these scarce habitats to ensure the long-term viability
of green turtles within the Mediterranean.
We stress the importance of having a balanced
satellite telemetry campaign, supported by long-term
SIA, as contributions from foraging areas to the breed-
ing cohort are unequal among years, and impor-
tantly, these proportions can shift dynamically over
time. These data can provide essential baseline evi-
dence to advise and monitor marine conservation
efforts such as establishing marine protected areas,
formulating site-specific management plans and in -
creasing international cooperation through the iden-
tification of important migratory links. A caveat to
this type of foraging area assessment is that males
are poorly represented. Evidence suggests that some
foraging areas can be highly female biased, reflect-
ing primary sex ratios (Jensen et al. 2016), and tar-
geted efforts are needed to collect more tissue sam-
ples from males. Future research will evaluate the
reasons for the substantial shift in the relative impor-
tance of these foraging areas and the root cause(s) for
the increase in recruitment from Lake Bardawil.
Acknowledgements. P.J.B. is funded by a National Environ-
ment Research Council grant 1353865. C.C. is supported by
the project CTM2013-48163 from Ministerio de Economía y
Competitividad. We thank the following for their support:
Marine Turtle Conservation Project (MTCP), Mediterranean
Association to Save the Sea Turtles (MEDASSSET), North
Cyprus Department of Environmental Protection, seaturtle.
org, Society for the Protection of Sea Turtles in North Cyprus
(SPOT); and for funding: Apache, British Chelonia Group,
BP Egypt, the British High Commission and British Residents
Society of North Cyprus, Darwin Initiative, Erwin Warth
Foundation, Friends of SPOT, INNPA, Kuzey Kıbrıs Turk-
cell, NERC, Marine Conservation Society Sea Turtle Conser-
vation Fund, and MEDASSET, UK. We also wish to thank E.
Duncan and L. Omeyer and the numerous MTCP volunteers
for their tireless efforts during fieldwork. Finally, we thank
the editor and 4 anonymous reviewers for their insightful
comments that have significantly improved this manuscript.
Abd Ellah RG, Hussein MM (2009) Physical limnology of Bar-
dawil Lagoon, Egypt. Am J Agric Environ Sci 5: 331−336
Barros NB, Ostrom PH, Stricker CA, Wells RS (2010) Stable
isotopes differentiate bottlenose dolphins off west- central
Florida. Mar Mamm Sci 26: 324−336
Barrow LM, Bjorndal KA, Reich KJ (2008) Effects of preser-
vation method on stable carbon and nitrogen isotope val-
ues. Physiol Biochem Zool 81: 688−693
Bjorndal KA, Parsons J, Mustin W, Bolten AB (2013) Thresh-
old to maturity in a long-lived reptile: interactions of age,
size, and growth. Mar Biol 160: 607−616
Block BA, Jonsen ID, Jorgensen SJ, Winship AJ and others
(2011) Tracking apex marine predator movements in a
dynamic ocean. Nature 475: 86−90
Bolker BM, Okuyama T, Bjorndal KA, Bolten AB (2007)
Incorporating multiple mixed stocks in mixed stock
analysis: ‘many-to-many’ analyses. Mol Ecol 16: 685−695
Bolten AB, Bjorndal KA, Martins HR, Dellinger T, Biscoito
MJ, Encalada SE, Bowen BW (1998) Transatlantic devel-
opmental migrations of loggerhead sea turtles demon-
strated by mtDNA sequence analysis. Ecol Appl 8: 1−7
Bond AL, Hobson KA (2012) Reporting stable-isotope ratios
in ecology: recommended terminology, guidelines and
best practices. Waterbirds 35: 324−331
Bonfil R, Meÿer M, Scholl MC, Johnson R and others (2005)
Transoceanic migration, spatial dynamics, and popula-
tion linkages of white sharks. Science 310: 100−103
Broderick AC, Godley BJ, Hays GC (2001) Trophic status
drives interannual variability in nesting numbers of mar-
ine turtles. Proc R Soc B 268: 1481−1487
Broderick AC, Glen F, Godley BJ, Hays GC (2003) Variation
in reproductive output of marine turtles. J Exp Mar Biol
Ecol 288: 95−109
Broderick AC, Coyne MS, Fuller WJ, Glen F, Godley BJ
(2007) Fidelity and over-wintering of sea turtles. Proc R
Soc B 274: 1533−1538
Cardona L, Aguilar A, Pazos L (2009) Delayed ontogenic
dietary shift and high levels of omnivory in green turtles
(Chelonia mydas) from the NW coast of Africa. Mar Biol
156: 1487−1495
Cardona L, Campos P, Levy Y, Demetropoulos A, Margari-
toulis D (2010) Asynchrony between dietary and nutri-
tional shifts during the ontogeny of green turtles (Chelo-
nia mydas) in the Mediterranean. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol
393: 83– 89
Casale P (2011) Sea turtle by-catch in the Mediterranean.
Fish Fish 12: 299−316
Casale P, Heppell S (2016) How much sea turtle bycatch is
too much? A stationary age distribution model for simu-
lating population abundance and potential biological
removal in the Mediterranean. Endang Species Res 29:
Ceriani SA, Roth JD, Evans DR, Weishampel JF, Ehrhart LM
(2012) Inferring foraging areas of nesting loggerhead
turtles using satellite telemetry and stable isotopes.
PLOS ONE 7: e45335
Ceriani SA, Roth JD, Ehrhart LM, Quintana-Ascencio PF,
Weishampel JF (2014) Developing a common currency
for stable isotope analyses of nesting marine turtles. Mar
Biol 161: 2257−2268
Christiansen F, Esteban N, Mortimer JA, Dujon AM, Hays GC
(2017) Diel and seasonal patterns in activity and home
range size of green turtles on their foraging grounds
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 582: 201–214, 2017
revealed by extended Fastloc-GPS tracking. Mar Biol 164:
Connolly RM, Guest MA, Melville AJ, Oakes JM (2004) Sul-
fur stable isotopes separate producers in marine food-
web analysis. Oecologia 138: 161−167
DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1978) Influence of diet on the distri-
bution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochim Cosmo -
chim Acta 42: 495−506
DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1981) Influence of diet on the distri-
bution of nitrogen isotopes in animals. Geochim Cos-
mochim Acta 45: 341−351
El-Bana M, Khedr A, Van Hecke P, Bogaert J (2002) Vegeta-
tion composition of a threatened hypersaline lake (Lake
Bardawil), North Sinai. Plant Ecol 163: 63−75
Fry B, Scalan RS, Winters JK, Parker PL (1982) Sulphur
uptake by salt grasses, mangroves, and seagrasses in
anaero bic sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 46:
Gaspar P, Benson SR, Dutton PH, Réveillère A and others
(2012) Oceanic dispersal of juvenile leatherback turtles:
going beyond passive drift modeling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser
Godley BJ, Thompson DR, Waldron S, Furness RW (1998)
The trophic status of marine turtles as determined by sta-
ble isotope analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 166: 277−284
Godley BJ, Richardson S, Broderick AC (2002) Long-term
satellite telemetry of the movements and habitat utilisa-
tion by green turtles in the Mediterranean. Ecography
25: 352−362
Godley BJ, Blumenthal JM, Broderick AC, Coyne MS,
Godfrey MH, Hawkes LA, Witt MJ (2008) Satellite
tracking of sea turtles: Where have we been and where
do we go next? Endang Species Res 4: 3−22
Graham BS, Koch PL, Newsome SD, McMahon KW, Aurioles
D (2010) Using isocapes to trace the movements and forag-
ing behavior of top predators in oceanic ecosystems. In:
West JB, Bowen GJ, Dawson TE, Tu KP (eds) Isoscapes:
understanding movement, pattern and process on Earth
through isotope mapping. Springer, New York, NY,
p 299−318
Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dis-
persal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28: 1140−1162
Hamann M, Godfrey MH, Seminoff JA, Arthur K and others
(2010) Global research priorities for sea turtles: inform-
ing management and conservation in the 21st century.
Endang Species Res 11: 245−269
Hart KM, Hyrenbach KD (2009) Satellite telemetry of mar-
ine megavertebrates: the coming of age of an experimen-
tal science. Endang Species Res 10: 9−20
Heide-Jørgensen MP, Laidre KL (2006) Dissolving stock dis-
creteness with satellite tracking: bowhead whales in Baf-
fin Bay. Mar Mamm Sci 22: 34−45
Hobson KA (1999) Tracing origins and migration of wildlife
using stable isotopes: a review. Oecologia 120: 314−326
Hobson KA (2007) Isotopic tracking of migrant wildlife. In:
Michener R, Lajtha K (eds) Stable isotopes in ecology and
environmental science, 2nd edn. Springer-Blackwell,
Oxford, p 155−175
Hobson KA, Schell DM (1998) Stable carbon and nitrogen
isotope patterns in baleen from eastern Arctic bowhead
whales (Balaena mysticetus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:
Hobson K, Welch H (1992) Determination of trophic rela-
tionships within a high Arctic marine food web using
δ13C and δ15N analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 84: 9−18
Hobson KA, Gloutney ML, Gibbs LH (1997) Preservation of
blood and tissue samples for stable-carbon and stable-
nitrogen isotope analysis. Can J Zool 75: 1720−1723
Hobson KA, Barnett-Johnson R, Cerling TE (2010) Using
isoscapes to track animal migration. In: West JB, Bowen
GJ, Dawson TE, Tu KP (eds) Isoscapes: understanding
movement, pattern and process on Earth through isotope
mapping. Springer, New York, NY, p 273−318
Jaeger A, Lecomte VJ, Weimerskirch H, Richard P, Cherel Y
(2010) Seabird satellite tracking validates the use of lati-
tudinal isoscapes to depict predators’ foraging areas in
the Southern Ocean. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 24:
Jeffers VF, Godley BJ (2016) Satellite tracking in sea turtles:
How do we find our way to the conservation dividends?
Biol Conserv 199: 172−184
Jensen MP, Pilcher N, FitzSimmons NN (2016) Genetic mark-
ers provide insight on origins of immature green turtles
Chelonia mydas with biased sex ratios at foraging grounds
in Sabah, Malaysia. Endang Species Res 31: 191−201
Kaufman TJ, Pajuelo M, Bjorndal KA, Bolten AB, Pfaller JB,
Williams KL, Vander Zanden HB (2014) Mother−egg sta-
ble isotope conversions and effects of lipid extraction and
ethanol preservation on loggerhead eggs. Conserv Physiol
2: cou049
Kendall C, Elliott EM, Wankel SD (2007) Tracing anthro-
pogenic inputs of nitrogen to ecosystems. In: Michener R,
Lajtha K (eds) Stable isotopes in ecology and environ-
mental science, 2nd edn. Springer-Blackwell, Oxford,
p 375−449
Koch PL (2007) Isotopic study of biology of modern and fossil
vertebrates. In: Micherner R, Lajtha K (eds) Stable iso-
topes in ecology and environmental science, 2nd edn.
Springer-Blackwell, Oxford, p 99−154
Lipkin Y (1977) Seagrass vegetation of Sinai and Israel. In:
McRoy CP, Helfferich C (eds) Seagrass ecosystems: a sci-
entific perspective. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY,
p 263−293
McMahon KW, Hamady LL, Thorrold SR (2013) A review of
ecogeochemistry approaches to estimating movements
of marine animals. Limnol Oceanogr 58: 697−714
Meylan AB, Bowen BW, Avise JC (1990) A genetic test of the
natal homing versus social facilitation models for green
turtle migration. Science 248: 724−727
Michener RH, Kaufman L (2007) Stable isotope ratios as
tracers in marine food webs: an update. In: Michener RH,
Lajtha K (eds) Stable isotopes in ecology and environ-
mental science, 2nd edn. Springer-Blackwell, Oxford,
p 238−282
Moncreiff C, Sullivan M (2001) Trophic importance of epi-
phytic algae in subtropical seagrass beds: evidence from
multiple stable isotope analyses. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 215:
Nada M, Boura L, Grimanis K, Schofield G and others (2013)
Egypt’s Bardawil Lake: safe haven or deadly trap for sea
turtles in the Mediterranean. A report by MEDASSET,
Athens, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, and Nature Con-
servation Egypt
Newsome SD, Martinez del Rio C, Bearhop S, Phillips DL
(2007) A niche for isotopic ecology. Front Ecol Environ 5:
Oakes JM, Connolly RM (2004) Causes of sulfur isotope
variability in the seagrass, Zostera capricorni. J Exp Mar
Biol Ecol 302: 153−164
Pajuelo M, Bjorndal KA, Reich KJ, Vander Zanden HB,
Bradshaw et al.: Differential recruitment of green turtles
Hawkes LA, Bolten AB (2012) Assignment of nesting
loggerhead turtles to their foraging areas in the North-
west Atlantic using stable isotopes. Ecosphere 3: art89
Pajuelo M, Bjorndal KA, Arendt MD, Foley AM, Schroeder
BA, Witherington BE, Bolten AB (2016) Long-term
resource use and foraging specialization in male logger-
head turtles. Mar Biol 163: 235
Peterson BJ, Fry B (1987) Stable isotopes in ecosystems stud-
ies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18: 293−320
Post DM, Layman CA, Arrington DA, Takimoto G, Quat-
trochi J, Montaña CG (2007) Getting to the fat of the mat-
ter: models, methods and assumptions for dealing with
lipids in stable isotope analyses. Oecologia 152: 179−189
Rees A, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Barata P, Bjorndal K and others
(2016) Are we working towards global research priorities
for management and conservation of sea turtles? Endang
Species Res 31: 337−382
Reich KJ, Bjorndal KA, Bolten AB (2007) The ‘lost years’ of
green turtles: using stable isotopes to study cryptic
lifestages. Biol Lett 3: 712−714
Reich KJ, Bjorndal KA, Martínez Del Rio C (2008) Effects of
growth and tissue type on the kinetics of 13C and 15N
incorporation in a rapidly growing ectotherm. Oecologia
155: 651−663
Revuelta O, Hawkes L, León YM, Godley BJ, Raga JA,
Tomás J (2015) Evaluating the importance of Marine Pro-
tected Areas for the conservation of hawksbill turtles
Eretmochelys imbricata nesting in the Dominican
Republic. Endang Species Res 27: 169−180
Robinson NJ, Morreale SJ, Nel R, Paladino FV (2016) Coastal
leatherback turtles reveal conservation hotspot. Sci Rep
6: 37851
Royle AJ, Rubenstein DR (2004) The role of species abun-
dance in determining breeding origins of migratory birds
with stable isotopes. Ecol Appl 14: 1780−1788
Rubenstein DR, Hobson KA (2004) From birds to butterflies:
animal movement patterns and stable isotopes. Trends
Ecol Evol 19: 256−263
Schofield G, Hobson VJ, Fossette S, Lilley MKS, Katselidis
KA, Hays GC (2010) Fidelity to foraging sites, consis-
tency of migration routes and habitat modulation of
home range by sea turtles. Divers Distrib 16: 840−853
Schofield G, Scott R, Dimadi A, Fossette S and others (2013)
Evidence-based marine protected area planning for a
highly mobile endangered marine vertebrate. Biol Con-
serv 161: 101−109
Scott R, Hodgson DJ, Witt MJ, Coyne MS and others (2012)
Global analysis of satellite tracking data shows that adult
green turtles are significantly aggregated in Marine Pro-
tected Areas. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21: 1053−1061
Scott R, Marsh R, Hays GC (2014) Ontogeny of long distance
migration. Ecology 95:2840–2850
Scott R, Biastoch A, Agamboue PD, Bayer T and others
(2017) Spatio-temporal variation in ocean current-driven
hatchling dispersion: implications for the world’ s largest
leatherback sea turtle nesting region. Divers Distrib:
Seminoff JA, Jones TT, Eguchi T, Jones DR, Dutton PH
(2006) Stable isotope discrimination (δ13C and δ15N)
between soft tissues of the green sea turtle Chelonia
mydas and its diet. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 308: 271−278
Seminoff JA, Benson SR, Arthur KE, Eguchi T, Dutton PH,
Tapilatu RF, Popp BN (2012) Stable isotope tracking of
endangered sea turtles: validation with satellite telemetry
and δ15N analysis of amino acids. PLOS ONE 7: e37403
Shillinger GL, Palacios DM, Bailey H, Bograd SJ and others
(2008) Persistent leatherback turtle migrations present
opportunities for conservation. PLOS Biol 6: e171
Shimada T, Aoki S, Kameda K, Hazel J, Reich K, Kamezaki N
(2014) Site fidelity, ontogenetic shift and diet composition
of green turtles Chelonia mydas in Japan inferred from
stable isotope analysis. Endang Species Res 25: 151−164
Shimada T, Limpus C, Jones R, Hazel J, Groom R, Hamann
M (2016) Sea turtles return home after intentional dis-
placement from coastal foraging areas. Mar Biol 163: 1−14
Somes CJ, Schmittner A, Galbraith ED, Lehmann MF and
others (2010) Simulating the global distribution of nitro-
gen isotopes in the ocean. Global Biogeochem Cycles 24:
Stokes KL, Fuller WJ, Glen F, Godley BJ, Hodgson DJ,
Rhodes KA, Snape RTE (2014) Detecting green shoots of
recovery: the importance of long-term individual-based
monitoring of marine turtles. Anim Conserv 17: 593−602
Stokes KL, Broderick AC, Canbolat AF, Candan O and oth-
ers (2015) Migratory corridors and foraging hotspots:
critical habitats identified for Mediterranean green tur-
tles. Divers Distrib 21: 665−674
Thode HG (1991) Sulphur isotopes in nature and the envi-
ronment: an overview. In: Krouse HR, Grinenko VA (eds)
Stable isotopes in the assessment of natural and anthro-
pogenic sulphur in the environment. SCOPE, John Wiley
& Sons, Chichester, p 1−26
Thomson J, Heithaus MR, Burkholder D, Vaudo J, Wirsing
A, Dill L (2012) Site specialists, diet generalists? Isotopic
variation, site fidelity, and foraging by loggerhead turtles
in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 453:
Tillberg CV, McCarthy DP, Dolezal AG, Suarez AV (2006)
Measuring the trophic ecology of ants using stable iso-
topes. Insectes Soc 53: 65−69
Tucker A, MacDonald B, Seminoff J (2014) Foraging site
fidelity and stable isotope values of loggerhead turtles
tracked in the Gulf of Mexico and northwest Caribbean.
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 502: 267−279
Vander Zanden MJ, Vadeboncoeur Y, Diebel MW, Jeppesen
E (2005) Primary consumer stable nitrogen isotopes as
indicators of nutrient source. Environ Sci Technol 39:
Vander Zanden HB, Bjorndal KA, Reich KJ, Bolten AB
(2010) Individual specialists in a generalist population:
results from a long-term stable isotope series. Biol Lett 6:
Vander Zanden HB, Bjorndal KA, Bolten AB (2013) Tempo-
ral consistency and individual specialization in resource
use by green turtles in successive life stages. Oecologia
173: 767−777
Vander Zanden HB, Tucker AD, Hart KM, Lamont MM and
others (2015) Determining origin in a migratory marine
vertebrate: a novel method to integrate stable isotopes
and satellite tracking. Ecol Appl 25: 320−335
Webster MS, Marra PP, Haig SM, Bensch S, Holmes RT
(2002) Links between worlds: unraveling migratory con-
nectivity. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 76−83
Wilson RP, McMahon CR (2006) Measuring devices on wild
animals: What constitutes acceptable practice? Front
Ecol Environ 4: 147−154
Wright LI, Stokes KL, Fuller WJ, Godley BJ and others
(2012) Turtle mating patterns buffer against disruptive
effects of climate change. Proc Biol Sci 279: 2122−2127
Wunder MB (2012) Determining geographic patterns of
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 582: 201–214, 2017
migration and dispersal using stable isotopes in keratins.
J Mammal 93: 360−367
Zbinden J, Bearhop S, Bradshaw P, Gill B, Margaritoulis D,
Newton J, Godley B (2011) Migratory dichotomy and as -
soci ated phenotypic variation in marine turtles re vealed
by satellite tracking and stable isotope analysis. Mar Ecol
Prog Ser 421: 291−302
Zerbini A, Andriolo A, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Pizzorno JL,
Maia Y, VanBlaricom G (2006) Satellite-monitored move-
ments of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae in
the Southwest Atlantic Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 313:
Zodiatis G, Drakopoulos P, Brenner S, Groom S (2005) Vari-
ability of the Cyprus warm core eddy during the
CYCLOPS project. Deep Sea Res II Top Stud Oceanogr
52: 2897–2910
Editorial responsibility: Keith Hobson,
London, Ontario, Canada
Submitted: February 14, 2017; Accepted: August 3, 2017
Proofs received from author(s): October 22, 2017
... Incidental capture is highly variable within the Mediterranean (Casale, 2011) and likely impacts nesting aggregations differently based on the genetic origin of individuals within each of the various fishing areas. For example, bycatch (Casale et al., 2010a;Casale, 2011;Nada and Casale, 2011;Turkozan et al., 2018) and intentional killing for meat (Nada and Casale, 2011) result in high sea turtle mortality in the Adriatic Sea, Egypt, the Tunisian Plateau and Turkey: all areas hosting foraging grounds for loggerhead (Bertuccio et al., 2019;Haywood et al., 2020b;Snape et al., 2016) and green turtles nesting in Cyprus (Bradshaw et al., 2017;Stokes et al., 2015) and for other populations and life stages . North Cyprus itself has high bycatch rates (Casale, 2011;Snape et al., 2016), and it appears that small juvenile green turtles, likely from mixed stocks, are heavily impacted in the local area. ...
... North Cyprus itself has high bycatch rates (Casale, 2011;Snape et al., 2016), and it appears that small juvenile green turtles, likely from mixed stocks, are heavily impacted in the local area. Only a few subadults and nonbreeding adults of this species are observed in the local small-scale fisheries (Snape et al., 2013) or use foraging sites in Cyprus despite their proximity (Bradshaw et al., 2017;Stokes et al., 2015). Differential bycatch among foraging areas may also explain differential rates of recruitment among foraging areas (Bradshaw et al., 2017). ...
... Only a few subadults and nonbreeding adults of this species are observed in the local small-scale fisheries (Snape et al., 2013) or use foraging sites in Cyprus despite their proximity (Bradshaw et al., 2017;Stokes et al., 2015). Differential bycatch among foraging areas may also explain differential rates of recruitment among foraging areas (Bradshaw et al., 2017). ...
Full-text available
Estimating life‐history traits and understanding their variation underpins the management of long‐lived, migratory animals, while knowledge of recovery dynamics can inform the management of conservation‐dependent species. Using a combination of nest counts and individual‐based life‐history data collected since 1993, we explore the drivers underlying contrasting population recovery rates of sympatrically nesting loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and green (Chelonia mydas) turtles in North Cyprus. We found that nest counts of loggerhead and green turtles from 28 beaches across the island increased by 46% and 162%, respectively over the past 27 years. A Bayesian state‐space model revealed that, at our individual‐based monitoring site, nesting of green turtles increased annually at four times the rate of that of loggerhead turtles. Furthermore, we found that loggerhead turtles nesting at the individual‐based monitoring site had stable reproductive parameters and average adult survival for the species and are the smallest breeding adults globally. Based on results from multiple matrix model scenarios, we propose that higher mortality rates of individuals in all age classes (likely driven by differences in life history and interaction with fisheries), rather than low reproductive output, are impeding the recovery of this species. While the increase in green turtles is encouraging, the Mediterranean population is estimated to have around 3,400 adults and is restricted to the Eastern Basin. The recovery of loggerhead turtles is likely to be compromised until mortality rates in the region are adequately quantified and mitigated. As survival of immature individuals is a powerful driver for sea turtle population numbers, additional efforts should target management at pelagic and neritic foraging areas. Understanding threats faced by immature life stages is crucial to accurately parameterise population models and to target conservation actions for long‐lived marine vertebrates. This paper uses 27 years of data to investigate the long‐term population trends of green and loggerhead turtles in North Cyprus and explores drivers of the different recovery patterns observed for the two species. Nest counts of loggerhead and green turtles from 28 beaches increased by 46% and 162%, respectively. A Bayesian state space model revealed that, at the individual‐based monitoring site, the number of nesting green turtles increased annually at four times the rate of that of loggerhead turtles. Based on results from multiple matrix model scenarios, we propose that higher mortality rates of individuals in all age‐classes (likely driven by greater interaction with fisheries), rather than low reproductive output, are impeding the recovery of loggerhead turtles. The species’ recovery is likely to be compromised until mortality rates in the region are adequately quantified and mitigated. Photo credit: Tevfik Camgoz
... On the other hand, hawksbill turtles inhabiting the Eastern Pacific are confined to this area, and no foreign rookery is known to contribute to any of the coastal foraging grounds along the Eastern Pacific (Gaos et al. 2017a(Gaos et al. , b, 2018. Despite persistent migratory behavior, sea turtles demonstrate fidelity to foraging habitats established during early neritic recruitment stages (Shimada et al. 2016;Bradshaw et al. 2017;Conrad et al. 2018;Hancock et al. 2018). Therefore, quality and sustainability of foraging habitats may be related to future reproductive output and recovery of endangered sea turtles in the Eastern Pacific (Harrison et al. 2011). ...
... Further, these models inform on temporal dietary switching, from historical diets (Conrad et al. 2018) to ontogenetic shifts (Reich et al. 2007;Vander Zanden et al. 2013;Howell et al. 2016;Burgett et al. 2018;Ferreira et al. 2018) to annual or seasonal patterns (Páez-Rosas et al. 2021). Geographically, stable isotope analysis has allowed scientists to link diet and foraging to specific and sometimes undiscovered habitats important to sea turtles (Lemons et al. 2011;Bradshaw et al. 2017;Hancock et al. 2018;Tomaszewicz et al. 2018;Fukuoka et al. 2019;Piovano et al. 2020) in addition to relating diet to oceanographic parameters such as sea surface temperature (Esteban et al. 2020). Finally, controlled studies have investigated isotopic incorporation rates and discrimination values in green turtles Vander Zanden et al. 2012). ...
Full-text available
We used stable isotopes to investigate isotopic niche size, overlap, and diet composition in green (black and yellow morphotype Chelonia mydas; 50.0 to 95.0 cm curved carapace length, CCL) and hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata; 38.5 to 83.0 cm CCL) in a recently described foraging habitat in North Pacific Costa Rica. We measured whole blood stable carbon (δ¹³C) and nitrogen (δ¹⁵N) ratios in black (n = 39; mean ± SD, − 16.54 ± 0.66‰ and 14.39 ± 0.77‰), yellow (n = 13; − 15.74 ± 0.65‰ and 12.37 ± 0.55‰) and hawksbill turtles (n = 13; − 16.23 ± 1.34‰ and 12.63 ± 0.32‰) and skin δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N values in black (n = 36; − 15.32 ± 0.79‰ and 15.16 ± 0.72‰), yellow (n = 12; − 15.38 ± 0.91‰ and 13.78 ± 0.75‰) and hawksbill turtles (n = 10; − 14.33 ± 1.49‰ and 13.77 ± 0.29‰). Isotopic niche space revealed distinctly higher δ¹⁵N area in black turtles and significant overlap between yellow and hawksbill turtles, and a recent shift in diet in yellow turtles from omnivory to herbivory. In black turtles, isotopic niche suggests individual specialization during the non-upwelling season and generalization in diet during the upwelling season. Mixing model results suggest that black turtles forage at multiple trophic levels (fish: 34.8 ± 10.1% of diet and macroalgae: 51.8 ± 12.8% of diet), while yellow and hawksbill turtles primarily forage on macroalgae (85.0 ± 6.6% in yellow turtles and 85.1 ± 5.9% in hawksbill turtles). These results add to a growing understanding that diet in sea turtles is influenced by diet items present in the environment and suggest that black turtles are potential tertiary consumers.
... The sequences were aligned using the BioEdit 7.2.6 program ClustalW multiple alignments (Thompson et al. 1994). The mtSTR haplotypes were coded as the number of repeats of each of the four mtSTRs, as described in previous studies (Tikochinski et al. 2012(Tikochinski et al. , 2018Bradshaw et al. 2017). ...
... These shared STRs are not found in combination with the CM-A13.1 in the Atlantic, but the similarity of haplotypes (in a phylogeographic context) suggests that the Mediterranean populations were originated by Atlantic colonizers as happened with other species (e.g., Caretta caretta). The only CR haplotypes known to occur in both regions are CM-A13.1 and CM-A27.1 (Encalada et al. 1996;Bagda et al. 2012), which was attributed to a limited gene flow over an ecological time scale (Bradshaw et al. 2017). ...
Full-text available
The Mediterranean green turtle regional management unit is one of the 17 management units of green turtles considered a global conservation priority. However, previous studies using different genetic markers revealed very little diversity and differentiation across populations due to the overdominance of one haplotype (CM-A13) in the Mediterranean. We, therefore, used a more informative marker, mitochondrial short tandem repeats (mtSTRs), in 431 samples collected along the eastern Mediterranean coasts of Turkey and Northern Cyprus. In addition, we added the mtSTR haplotypes of previous studies and reached a total of 980 samples covering 12 nesting beaches (almost 100% of the populations in the region). We identified 42 haplotypes, 4 of which were recorded for the first time in the region. The species has a genetic diversity in the region higher than previously thought, ranging from 0.54 (Sugözü, Turkey) to 0.934 (Israel) and with the most common haplotypes being 6-8-8–4 (26.5%), 6-8-5-4 (17.3%), and 6-8-6-4 (14.9%). The analysis of a more extensive data set of mtSTRs supported recognizing at least three management units in the Mediterranean. Furthermore, we used the new data to assess the origin of the turtles foraging in Israel. We determined that Samandağ (Turkey) was the population of origin of most of the individuals. Overall, we show that mtSTRs highly improve the resolution to detect population structuring and source for this species and region.
... In addition to the potential effects of shifting juvenile growth rates, these changes in loggerhead nester size through time may reflect differences in foraging area inputs to the nesting population. Females leaving a rookery after nesting transition to different foraging locations (Seminoff et al. 2008, Zbinden et al. 2011, Vander Zanden et al. 2014, Ceriani et al. 2015, Bradshaw et al. 2017, Phillips et al. 2021; this variation in foraging site selection may influence resource availability and subsequent growth potential, with females from some foraging areas significantly larger than females from other areas occupying the same nesting habitat (Zbinden et al. 2011, Vander Zanden et al. 2014, Ceriani et al. 2015. Reproductively active females exhibit fidelity to foraging sites between breeding seasons (Broderick et al. 2007, Phillips et al. 2021. ...
... Changes at foraging areas may have lagged effects that significantly alter the composition of a nesting population. For example, Bradshaw et al. (2017) found a significant change in the contribution of different foraging areas to a Mediterranean green turtle nesting population over 23 yr. Nesting assemblages dispersing to a variety of foraging areas may experience a broader range of food quality and availability. ...
Full-text available
For species reaching maturity at a range of ages or sizes, factors that influence juvenile growth and size at maturity may have lasting impacts on overall fitness. Assessing when animals reach maturity is especially challenging for species which are difficult to follow through time as a result of highly migratory behavior, long life spans, or both. We examined nesting female size in a reproductive assemblage of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) and loggerheads (Caretta caretta) on the east coast of Florida, USA. We used a long‐term dataset from 1982 to 2019 to estimate a minimum size at maturity interval on the basis of two standard deviations below mean female size for each species. The minimum size intervals for green turtles (81.4–89.3 cm) and loggerheads (68.1–79.1 cm) were lower than most previous estimates in the literature, many of which were simply the smallest individual ever observed. There was a significant decrease in the upper bound of the minimum size interval over the study period for both green turtles (1.6 cm) and loggerheads (4.1 cm). These shifts in size at maturity may be the result of changes in population demographics, habitat quality, and behavioral reactions to these changes. The development and periodic reassessment of robust estimators of maturity are an important part of programs centered around the monitoring and conservation of vulnerable wildlife populations.
... Nesting sites may host turtles that originate from multiple foraging areas (Limpus et al. 1992;Bjorndal et al. 2005), and foraging areas may be home to turtles from multiple nesting sites (Casale et al. 2008;Carreras et al. 2011). The linkages between foraging areas and nesting sites have been documented via genetic studies (Bjorndal et al. 2005;Bowen and Karl 2007), stable isotope studies (Bradshaw et al. 2017), and satellite tracking (Schofield et al 2013;Hays et al. 2014). Understanding this connectivity between nesting sites and foraging areas is a key component of conservation planning as it allows for the development of effective conservation agendas (Martin et al. 2007;Hamann et al. 2010;Hays et al. 2014;Dunn et al. 2019). ...
... Nesting sites can host sea turtles from multiple distant foraging areas (Luschi et al. 1996;Bolker et al. 2007;Bradshaw et al. 2017) and our findings, combined with past tracking efforts (Rees et al. 2012) and historical flipper tag returns (Salm et al. 1993), along with recent tracking of 45 foraging turtles from 2 foraging areas in the United Arab Emirates (Pilcher et al. 2020) reveal that Ras Al Hadd is a regionally important nesting site for green turtles. ...
Full-text available
There is limited information on postnesting dispersal of green turtles Chelonia mydas from nesting sites in the Arabian region. Understanding habitat connectivity can promote effective conservation programs across a wider range of critical sea turtle habitats. We present postnesting migration data for 9 green turtles departing from Ras Al Hadd in Oman, one of the largest and most important nesting sites for this species in the northwest Indian Ocean (NWIO). Turtles migrated to Eritrea (n = 1), India (n = 2), Oman (n = 4), and the United Arab Emirates (n = 2), demonstrating connectivity for this species across the NWIO and linkages to known green turtle foraging areas. Turtles used deep international waters of the NWIO, and coastal waters of Eritrea, India, Iran, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. Alongside the potential for fisheries bycatch, ghost fishing, entanglement, and direct take in waters near nesting sites and at the dispersal destinations, these movement patterns reveal a need for coordinated efforts to address sea turtle mortality in fisheries at a regional level. These data enhance our knowledge of sea turtle distribution and connectivity in the Arabian region and will contribute to ongoing efforts to conserve sea turtles in the NWIO.
... While researchers have applied this method to understand many facets of an animal's trophic ecology, including interspecific competition and dietary response to pollutants , DNA metabarcoding is hindered by its inability to provide accurate estimates of prey count or biomass (Piñol et al. 2015;Jusino et al. 2019) due to the biases inherent to DNA amplification and sequencing . Therefore, when researchers require quantitative information about an animal's trophic ecology, they frequently turn to stable isotope analysis, a laboratory method which quantifies the ratio of elemental isotopes found in consumer tissues to determine many facets of an animal's trophic niche, such as their basal nutrient source (DeNiro and Epstein 1978), their trophic level (Wassenaar 2019), and even the areas where these animals forage (Bradshaw et al. 2017). Following the principle, "you are what you eat, plus a few per mille" (DeNiro 1976), researchers can also use stable isotope mixing models (Phillips 2012), which compare predator and prey isotopic values, to determine the relative contribution of prey-derived elements, and as a result, the relative contribution of prey to the diets of their consumers. ...
The introduction of laboratory methods to animal dietary studies has allowed researchers to obtain results with accuracy and precision not possible with observational techniques. For example, DNA barcoding, or the identification of prey with taxon-specific DNA sequences, allows researchers to classify digested prey tissues to the species-level, while stable isotope analysis paired with Bayesian mixing models can quantify dietary contributions by comparing a consumer's isotopic values to those derived from their prey. However, DNA-based methods are currently only able to classify, but not quantify, the taxa present in a diet sample, while stable isotope analysis can only quantify dietary taxa that are identified a priori as prey isotopic values are a result of life history traits, not phylogenetic relatedness. Recently, researchers have begun to couple these techniques in dietary studies to capitalize on the reciprocal benefits and drawbacks offered by each approach, with some even integrating DNA-based results directly into Bayesian mixing models as informative priors. As the informative priors used in these models must represent known dietary compositions (e.g., percentages of prey biomasses), researchers have scaled the DNA-based frequency of occurrence of major prey groups so that their normalized frequency of occurrence sums to 100%. Unfortunately, such an approach is problematic as priors stemming from binomial, DNA-based data do not truly reflect quantitative information about the consumer's diet and may skew the posterior distribution of prey quantities as a result. Therefore, we present a novel approach to incorporate DNA-based dietary information into Bayesian stable isotope mixing models that preserves the binomial nature of DNA-based results. This approach uses community-wide frequency of occurrence or logistic regression-based estimates of prey occurrence to dictate the probability that each prey group is included in each mixing model iteration, and, in turn, the probability that each iteration's results are included in the posterior distribution of prey composition possibilities. Here, we demonstrate the utility of this method by using it to quantify the prey composition of nestling Louisiana waterthrush (Parkesia motacilla).
... physical contact between individuals)(Lavelle et al., 2012;Moll et al., 2007). Likewise, combining animal tracking with stable isotope or DNA metabarcoding data can help uncover how foraging decisions may influence patterns of movement and space useBradshaw et al., 2017;Votier et al., 2010). To date, studies of such sophistication have predominantly focused on individuals of a single species (see Section 9), but multi-species extensions represent an exciting avenue for future research. ...
Full-text available
1. Individual decisions regarding how, why, and when organisms interact with one another and with their environment scale up to shape patterns and processes in communities. Recent evidence has firmly established the prevalence of intraspecific variation in nature and its relevance in community ecology, yet challenges associated with collecting data on large numbers of individual conspecifics and heterospecifics has hampered integration of individual variation into community ecology. 2. Nevertheless, recent technological and statistical advances in GPS‐tracking, remote sensing, and behavioral ecology offer a toolbox for integrating intraspecific variation into community processes. More than simply describing where organisms go, movement data provide unique information about interactions and environmental associations from which a true individual‐to‐community framework can be built. 3. By linking the movement paths of both conspecifics and heterospecifics with environmental data, ecologists can now simultaneously quantify intra‐ and interspecific variation regarding the Eltonian (biotic interactions) and Grinnellian (environmental conditions) factors underpinning community assemblage and dynamics, yet substantial logistical and analytical challenges must be addressed for these approaches to realize their full potential. 4. Across communities, empirical integration of Eltonian and Grinnellian factors can support conservation applications and reveal metacommunity dynamics via tracking‐based dispersal data. As the logistical and analytical challenges associated with multi‐species tracking are surmounted, we envision a future where individual movements and their ecological and environmental signatures will bring resolution to many enduring issues in community ecology.
... betweenness, centrality, closeness, graph theory, marine turtle, migratory, satellite telemetry, tracking collected with capture-mark-recapture, tracking, genetic, and stable isotope analytical methods (Bradshaw et al., 2017;Ceriani et al., 2017;Godley et al., 2010;Nishizawa et al., 2018;Rees et al., 2017). ...
Full-text available
Aim Understanding the spatial ecology of animal movements is a critical element in conserving long‐lived, highly mobile marine species. Analyzing networks developed from movements of six sea turtle species reveals marine connectivity and can help prioritize conservation efforts. Location Global. Methods We collated telemetry data from 1235 individuals and reviewed the literature to determine our dataset's representativeness. We used the telemetry data to develop spatial networks at different scales to examine areas, connections, and their geographic arrangement. We used graph theory metrics to compare networks across regions and species and to identify the role of important areas and connections. Results Relevant literature and citations for data used in this study had very little overlap. Network analysis showed that sampling effort influenced network structure, and the arrangement of areas and connections for most networks was complex. However, important areas and connections identified by graph theory metrics can be different than areas of high data density. For the global network, marine regions in the Mediterranean had high closeness, while links with high betweenness among marine regions in the South Atlantic were critical for maintaining connectivity. Comparisons among species‐specific networks showed that functional connectivity was related to movement ecology, resulting in networks composed of different areas and links. Main conclusions Network analysis identified the structure and functional connectivity of the sea turtles in our sample at multiple scales. These network characteristics could help guide the coordination of management strategies for wide‐ranging animals throughout their geographic extent. Most networks had complex structures that can contribute to greater robustness but may be more difficult to manage changes when compared to simpler forms. Area‐based conservation measures would benefit sea turtle populations when directed toward areas with high closeness dominating network function. Promoting seascape connectivity of links with high betweenness would decrease network vulnerability.
... In recent years, satellite tracking of marine turtle movements between their nesting sites and foraging areas has elucidated much of the previously unknown biology and habitat use (Godley et al., 2002(Godley et al., , 2008Luschi et al., 2003;Blumenthal et al., 2006;Hart et al., 2013Hart et al., , 2017Luschi and Casale, 2014;Pilcher et al., 2014Pilcher et al., , 2021aRees et al., 2016;Ferreira et al., 2020), including bi-directional movements (Limpus and Limpus, 2001;Pilcher et al., 2020). It is now well established that post-nesting turtles which used a particular nesting location return to several different foraging areas (Luschi et al., 1996;Bjorndal et al., 2005;Blumenthal et al., 2006;Bolker et al., 2007;Bradshaw et al., 2017;Shimada et al., 2020). Conversely, turtles foraging in one general habitat disperse to several different nesting locations (i.e., mixed stock) (Limpus et al., 1992;Dethmers et al., 2010;Carreras et al., 2011;Jensen et al., 2013;Read et al., 2015;Dutton et al., 2018). ...
Full-text available
Identifying migratory pathways and linking nesting sites to foraging areas is essential for effective conservation management of migratory species, such as marine turtles. Post-nesting marine turtles disperse from their nesting sites to multiple foraging areas located from a few to hundreds of kilometers away. Over a six-year period 16 female green turtles (Chelonia mydas) were equipped with satellite transmitters between October and December of five nesting seasons to determine their migratory routes from their nesting area at five contiguous beaches at Ras Baridi, Saudi Arabia, to their foraging areas. All foraging areas for these turtles were located in shallow coastal areas or in shallow areas around offshore islands within the Red Sea basin. The majority ( n = 12) migrated through the shallow (<200 m) water along the coastal margin to reach foraging areas located to the North ( n = 4) and South ( n = 12) of the nesting site. Four turtles crossed the deep trough of the Red Sea during their journeys. Ten of the 16 turtles migrated to foraging areas within the territorial waters of Saudi Arabia. The other six turtles migrated to foraging areas in Egypt ( n = 4) and Eritrea ( n = 2). These 16 turtles traveled between 130 and 1749 km from their nesting site to foraging areas located in the northern, middle and southern parts of the Red Sea. Because these turtles utilized foraging areas in at least three countries (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Eritrea) and one passed through the territorial waters of Sudan, conservation and management of green turtles in the Red Sea requires multinational cooperation to address anthropogenic threats in the region.
... Stable isotope studies of modern mediterranean sea turtles have provided information on which foraging grounds are utilised. By satellite tracking green (Bradshaw et al., 2017) and loggerhead (Haywood et al., 2020) turtles from the Levant; nitrogen, carbon and sulphur stable isotope profiles of several distinct foraging locations were identified, other turtles were then able to be assigned to these foraging areas using bayesian statistical methods. Stable isotopes of ancient remains could confirm if sea turtles are still foraging in the same areas, and therefore provide a tangible indication of how important specific areas are to sea turtle conservation currently and in the future. ...
Full-text available
Humans have been exploiting marine resources along the Levantine coast for millennia. Advances in biomolecular archaeology present novel opportunities to understand the exploitation of these taxa in antiquity. We discuss the potential insights generated by applying collagen peptide fingerprinting, ancient DNA analysis, and stable isotope analysis to groupers (Serranidae) and sea turtles (Chelonia mydas and Caretta caretta) in the Levant. When combined with traditional zooarchaeological techniques, biomolecular archaeology offers utility to further investigate human impacts on marine ecosystems.
Full-text available
In 2010, an international group of 35 sea turtle researchers refined an initial list of more than 200 research questions into 20 metaquestions that were considered key for management and conservation of sea turtles. These were classified under 5 categories: reproductive biology , biogeography, population ecology, threats and conservation strategies. To obtain a picture of how research is being focused towards these key questions, we undertook a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature (2014 and 2015) attributing papers to the original 20 questions. In total, we reviewed 605 articles in full and from these 355 (59%) were judged to substantively address the 20 key questions, with others focusing on basic science and monitoring. Progress to answering the 20 questions was not uniform, and there were biases regarding focal turtle species, geographic scope and publication outlet. Whilst it offers some meaningful indications as to effort, quantifying peer-reviewed literature output is ob viously not the only, and possibly not the best, metric for understanding progress towards informing key conservation and management goals. Along with the literature review, an international group based on the original project consortium was assigned to critically summarise recent progress towards answering each of the 20 questions. We found that significant research is being expended towards global priorities for management and conservation of sea turtles. Although highly variable, there has been significant progress in all the key questions identified in 2010. Undertaking this critical review has highlighted that it may be timely to undertake one or more new prioritizing exercises. For this to have maximal benefit we make a range of recommendations for its execution. These include a far greater engagement with social sciences, widening the pool of contributors and focussing the questions, perhaps disaggregating ecology and conservation.
Full-text available
An animal’s home range is driven by a range of factors including top-down (predation risk) and bottom-up (habitat quality) processes, which often vary in both space and time. We assessed the role of these processes in driving spatiotemporal patterns in the home range of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas), an important marine megaherbivore. We satellite tracked adult green turtles using Fastloc-GPS telemetry in the Chagos Archipelago and tracked their fine-scale movement in different foraging areas in the Indian Ocean. Using this extensive data set (5081 locations over 1675 tracking days for 8 individuals), we showed that green turtles exhibit both diel and seasonal patterns in activity and home range size. At night, turtles had smaller home ranges and lower activity levels, suggesting they were resting. In the daytime, home ranges were larger and activity levels higher, indicating that turtles were actively feeding. The transit distance between diurnal and nocturnal sites varied considerably between individuals. Further, some turtles changed resting and foraging sites seasonally. These structured movements indicate that turtles had a good understanding of their foraging grounds in regard to suitable areas for foraging and sheltered areas for resting. The clear diel patterns and the restricted size of nocturnal sites could be caused by spatiotemporal variations in predation risk, although other factors (e.g. depth, tides and currents) could also be important. The diurnal and seasonal pattern in home range sizes could similarly be driven by spatiotemporal variations in habitat (e.g. seagrass or algae) quality, although this could not be confirmed.
Full-text available
Previous studies have shown that the world’s largest reptile – the leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea – conducts flexible foraging migrations that can cover thousands of kilometres between nesting sites and distant foraging areas. The vast distances that may be travelled by migrating leatherback turtles have greatly complicated conservation efforts for this species worldwide. However, we demonstrate, using a combination of satellite telemetry and stable isotope analysis, that approximately half of the nesting leatherbacks from an important rookery in South Africa do not migrate to distant foraging areas, but rather, forage in the coastal waters of the nearby Mozambique Channel. Moreover, this coastal cohort appears to remain resident year-round in shallow waters (<50 m depth) in a relatively fixed area. Stable isotope analyses further indicate that the Mozambique Channel also hosts large numbers of loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta. The rare presence of a resident coastal aggregation of leatherback turtles not only presents a unique opportunity for conservation, but alongside the presence of loggerhead turtles and other endangered marine megafauna in the Mozambique Channel, highlights the importance of this area as a marine biodiversity hotspot.
Full-text available
An understanding of population dynamics is needed to assess the viability of migratory species. Monitoring of marine turtles at foraging grounds may detect changes in population trends that would take decades to be seen at nesting beaches. Mixed Stock Analysis using molecular markers provides a tool for estimating the origin of turtles sampled at foraging grounds. Here, we analysed mitochondrial DNA sequences of 90 immature green turtles at 2 foraging grounds in northwestern Sabah, Malaysia. We used data from 30 Indo-Pacific green turtle rookeries as the baseline for tracing the origin of turtles at the 2 foraging grounds. The inferred origins of turtles at the 2 locations were not different and indicated that the majority originated from 3 major populations in Southeast Asia, the Turtle Islands of Sarawak in northwestern Borneo (29%), the Turtle Islands Heritage Protected Area (TIHPA) (28%) and Peninsular Malaysia (25%). Previous analyses indicated a 1:4 female-biased sex ratio at the foraging grounds, and based on our results, this largely reflects the use of unshaded beach hatcheries at some of the source rookeries for decades, which resulted in mostly female hatchlings. This result is supported by differences in the origins of male and female turtles. The result suggests a greater proportion of males originating from Peninsular Malaysia and fewer males originating from Sarawak and possibly the TIHPA compared to females. We discuss the implications of hatchery practices that influence sex ratios of hatchlings and recommend future research to improve the management of marine turtles in the region.
Full-text available
Full text available here: Intra-population variation in resource use has been increasingly reported for different taxa. In particular, foraging specialization of individuals has been quantified for various generalist populations. Because individual differences in resource use can have a great effect on a population’s ecological and evolutionary dynamics, it is essential to accurately assess how individuals exploit resources. Recent studies have shown that female sea turtles exhibit long-term individual specialization in resource use. In this study, we used stable isotope analysis (δ15N and δ13C) of serially sampled sea turtle scutes from two foraging areas in the Northwest Atlantic to evaluate whether male loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) exhibit patterns in resource use over time similar to those reported for female turtles. We found that some male loggerheads show individual specialization and a long-term consistency in resource use over several years—which adds support to previous findings that male loggerheads exhibit site fidelity to their foraging areas—while others are less consistent or only exhibit consistency for shorter periods of time. This variation in patterns of resource use among male loggerheads appears to be linked to foraging area locations, which were characterized by distinct resource diversity. Thus, these results suggest that resource diversity (habitat and prey items) present at the foraging areas may affect the degree of temporal consistency in resource use and potentially individual foraging specialization in loggerheads. Understanding the drivers of intra-population variation in resource use in loggerheads will allow us to predict how they will respond to changing environmental conditions.
Full-text available
Vulnerable species may be removed from their normal habitat and released at a new location for conservation reasons (e.g. re-establish or augment a local population) or due to difficulty or danger in returning individuals to original sites (e.g. after captivity for research or rehabilitation). Achieving the intended conservation benefits will depend, in part, on whether or not the released animals remain at the new human-selected location. The present study tested the hypothesis that hard-shelled sea turtles along the coast of north-eastern Australia (9-28°S, 142-153°E) would not remain at new locations and would attempt to return to their original areas. We used satellite-tracking data gathered previously for different purposes over several years (1996 to 2014). Some turtles had been released at their capture sites, inferred to be home areas, while other turtles had been displaced (released away from their inferred home areas) for various reasons. All non-displaced turtles (n = 54) remained at their home areas for the duration of tracking. Among displaced turtles (n = 59) the large majority travelled back to their respective home areas (n = 52) or near home (n = 4). Homing turtles travelled faster and adopted straighter routes in cooler water, and travelled faster by day than by night. Our results showed that displacement up to 117.4 km and captivity up to 514 days did not disrupt homing ability nor diminish fidelity to the home area. However, for homing turtles we infer energetic costs and heightened risk in unfamiliar coastal waters. Confirmed homing suggests that moving individuals away from danger might offer short-term benefit (e.g. rescue from an oil spill) but moving turtles to a new foraging area is unlikely to succeed as a long-term conservation strategy. Priority must rather be placed on protecting their original habitat.
Full-text available
Mediterranean populations of loggerhead Caretta caretta and green sea turtles Chelonia mydas are subject to several anthropogenic threats, with documented mortality from incidental capture in fishing gear. However, how such mortalities actually affect the populations is uncertain without an estimate of population size. We derived a theoretical demographic structure for each species in the Mediterranean, assuming a stationary age distribution in a stable population with constant proportions of turtles in each life stage, using distributions of age-specific vital rates. We incorporated uncertainty into the main vital rate parameters to identify a likely order of magnitude of turtle abundance in different life stages. Through this approach, we aim to (1) provide a rough estimate of all population stage classes, particularly the juvenile classes that are most subject to fisheries interactions, (2) provide an estimate of reproductive life span, (3) identify and review the key demographic parameters, and (4) identify the priority gaps in our information in need of further investigation. The range of population abundance estimates from the models constructed with uncertainty (95% CI) was 0.81-3.38 million loggerheads and 0.26-2.21 million green turtles, Mediterranean-wide. When we calculated the potential biological removal for the segment of the population at risk of fisheries capture, our estimates were comparable to or lower than the estimated bycatch levels in fisheries. Although the model assumes a stable population and provides only a rough estimate of abundance, these results suggest that the current bycatch level should be regarded as unsustainable for Mediterranean turtle populations
As species of conservation concern, sea turtles have historically been difficult to study because of their elusive nature and extensive ranges, but improvements in telemetry have facilitated insights into life histories and behaviours which can potentially inform conservation policies. To date, there have been few assessments of the impact of satellite tracking data on species conservation, and it is difficult to clearly gauge whether the dividends justify the costs. Through an extensive review of the literature (369 papers, 1982–2014) and a questionnaire-based survey of 171 sea turtle tracking researchers, we evaluate the conservation dividends gained thus far from tracking and highlight conservation successes. We discuss who is tracking and where, where biases in effort exist, and evaluate the impact of tracking data on conservation. Conservation issues are increasingly being considered. Where research recommends policy change, the quality of advice varies and the level of uptake is still uncertain, with few clearly described examples of tracking-data actually influencing policy. The means to increase the conservation impact are discussed, including: disseminating findings more widely; communicating and collaborating with colleagues and stakeholders for more effective data sharing; community liaison, and endeavouring to close the gaps between researchers and conservation practitioners.
Stable isotope ratio variation in natural systems reflects the dynamics of Earth systems processes and imparts isotope labels to Earth materials. Carbon isotope ratios of atmospheric CO2 record exchange of carbon between the biosphere and the atmosphere; the incredible journeys of migrating monarchs is documented by hydrogen isotopes in their wings; and water carries an isotopic record of its source and history as it traverses the atmosphere and land surface. Through these and many other examples, improved understanding of spatio-temporal isotopic variation in Earth systems is leading to innovative new approaches to scientific problem-solving. This volume provides a comprehensive overview of the theory, methods, and applications that are enabling new disciplinary and cross-disciplinary advances through the study of "isoscapes": isotopic landscapes. "This impressive new volume shows scientists deciphering and using the natural isotope landscapes that subtly adorn our spaceship Earth." Brian Fry, Coastal Ecology Institute, Louisiana State University, USA "An excellent timely must read and must-have reference book for anybody interested or engaged in applying stable isotope signatures to questions in e.g. Anthropology, Biogeochemistry, Ecology, or Forensic Science regarding chronological and spatial movement, changes, or distribution relating to animals, humans, plants, or water." Wolfram Meier-Augenstein, Centre for Anatomy & Human Identification, University of Dundee, UK "Natural resources are being affected by global change, but exactly where, how, and at what pace? Isoscapes provide new and remarkably precise answers." John Hayes, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, USA "This exciting volume is shaping a new landscape in environmental sciences that is utilizing the remarkable advances in isotope research to enhance and extend the capabilities of the field." Dan Yakir, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel.
Nine bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) were instrumented with satellite transmitters in West Greenland in May 2002 and 2003. Transmitters were either encased in steel cans or imbedded in floats attached to wires. Transmitters mounted in steel cans had a high initial failure rate, yet those that were Successful provided tracking durations up to seven months. Float tags had a low initial failure rate and initially provided large numbers of positions; however, they had deployment durations of only 2-33 d. All tracked whales departed from West Greenland and headed northwest towards Lancaster Sound in the end of May. Three tags with long tracking durations (197-217 d) recorded movements of whales (1 male, 2 female) into December in 2002 and 2003. All of these individuals remained within the Canadian High Arctic or along the east coast of Baffin Island in summer and early fall. By the end of October, all three whales moved rapidly south along the east coast of Baffin Island and entered Hudson Strait, an apparent wintering ground for the population. One of the whales did not visit Isabella Bay on east Baffin Island, the locality used for abundance estimation from photographic reidentification of individuals. The movements of whales tagged in this study raise critical questions about the assumed stock discreteness of bowhead whales in Foxe Basin, Hudson Strait, and Davis Strait and indicate current estimates of abundance are negatively biased.