ArticlePDF Available

A Healthy City Project: A Case Study of Wonju City, South Korea and its Relevance to the Cities in Nepal

Authors:
  • Gandaki Medical College Teaching Hospital and Research Center

Abstract

p class="Pa9"> Introduction : One of the goals of sustainable development is to make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. The healthy city approach is becoming increasingly important in addressing a large number of urban health problems and promoting healthy lifestyles in city dwellers. Objectives: We performed a case study of the healthy city project in Wonju, South Korea to find out its characteristics and approaches, and to explore its relevance to the cities in Nepal. Methods : We conducted a case study of the healthy city Wonju project by reviewing relevant published articles and web pages of the city (http://healthycity.wonju.go.kr), alliance for healthy cities, Korean statistical information service and World Health Organization. We also reviewed articles and documents related to healthy cities in South-East Asian countries and Nepal. Results : The healthy city Wonju project, started in 2004, executed its five-year plan between 2006 and 2010, and is currently running with its 10 year long-term plan (2011- 2020). For its success, Wonju City has been awarded six times by WHO. Recently, Wonju city organized the seventh global conference of the AFHC in August, 2016 in Wonju with the main theme of “our cities, our health, our future”. Key features of the healthy city Wonju project included: Strong political commitment of local government, financing the healthy city initiative with tobacco consumption tax, partnerships with universities, well organized healthy city teams under city administration, coordination with national and regional healthy cities alliance, community participation, and involvement in research for evidence-based planning and evaluation. Nepal, one of the fast urbanizing countries in South-East Asia faces large number of urban health problems. Conclusions : Though numbers of cities and city dwellers are increasing rapidly, Nepal lacks healthy city projects and networking. The approaches of healthy city Wonju might be useful for developing countries such as Nepal to initiate and develop healthy cities projects in a sustainable way. Journal of Gandaki Medical College Vol. 10, No. 1, 2017, page: 34-42</p
J-GMC-N | Volume 10 | Issue 01 | January-June 2017page 34
Original Article | Journal of Gandaki Medical College-Nepal
A Healthy City Project: A Case Study of Wonju
City, South Korea and its
Relevance to the Cities in Nepal
Sharma B1,2, Nam EW1,2*
1Healthy City Research Center, Yonsei University, Wonju, South Korea,
2Department of Health Administration, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju, South Korea
ABSTRACT
Introduction: One of the goals of sustainable development is to
make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. The healthy city
approach is becoming increasingly important in addressing a large
number of urban health problems and promoting healthy lifestyles in
city dwellers.
Objectives: We performed a case study of the healthy city project in

to explore its relevance to the cities in Nepal.
Methods: We conducted a case study of the healthy city Wonju project
by reviewing relevant published articles and web pages of the city
(http://healthycity.wonju.go.kr), alliance for healthy cities, Korean
statistical information service and World Health Organization. We also
reviewed articles and documents related to healthy cities in South-East
Asian countries and Nepal.
Results: The healthy city Wonju project, started in 2004, executed its
  
its 10 year long-term plan (2011- 2020). For its success, Wonju City has
been awarded six times by WHO. Recently, Wonju city organized the
seventh global conference of the AFHC in August, 2016 in Wonju with
the main theme of “our cities, our health, our future”. Key features of
the healthy city Wonju project included: Strong political commitment
   
consumption tax, partnerships with universities, well organized healthy
city teams under city administration, coordination with national
and regional healthy cities alliance, community participation, and
involvement in research for evidence-based planning and evaluation.
Nepal, one of the fast urbanizing countries in South-East Asia faces
large number of urban health problems.
Conclusions: Though numbers of cities and city dwellers are
increasing rapidly, Nepal lacks healthy city projects and networking.
The approaches of healthy city Wonju might be useful for developing
countries such as Nepal to initiate and develop healthy cities projects
in a sustainable way.
Keywords
Case study, Developing countries,
Healthy City, Nepal, Wonju.
Corresponding author
Eun Woo Nam
Yonseidae-gil, Wonju-City, Gangwon-Do,
26493, Republic of Korea
E-mail: ewnam@yonsei.ac.kr
Ms Bimala Sharma
E-mail: bimalasharma@gmail.com
J-GMC-N | Volume 10 | Issue 01 | January-June 2017 page 35
| Original Article
INTRODUCTION
Concept of healthy city
  
city as one that is continually creating and improving
physical and social environments, and expanding
community resources that enable people to mutually
support each other in performing all the functions of life
and to reach their maximum potential1. Currently, more
than 50% of the world’s population lives in urban areas,
and it is estimated that 70% of the world’s population
will be living in towns and cities by 2050; Africa and
Asia are urbanizing faster than the other regions2,3. The
healthy city approach is becoming increasingly important
in addressing a large number of urban health problems
arising due to urbanization and globalization in both
developed as well as developing countries. “Make cities
inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable” is one of the goals
of sustainable development (SDGs)4
that cities have been prioritized on the global development
agenda. Municipal and local Governments have the ability
to act on urban health issues in a responsive manner to
5.
Health challenges particularly obvious in cities relate
to water, environment, violence and injury, non-
communicable diseases (NCDs), unhealthy diets, physical
inactivity, harmful use of alcohol, and outbreak of diseases.
Participation in physical activity is obstructed by a variety
of urban factors including overcrowding, high-volume of
       
quality, and lack of safe public spaces and sports facilities2.
On the other hand, acting on urban health inequities
requires the involvement of organized communities and
all levels of Government; local, and national6.
Healthy cities program is a long-term international
development initiative that aims to place health on the
agendas of decision makers and to promote comprehensive
local strategies for health protection and sustainable
development through community participation,
empowerment, intersectoral partnership, and equity.
       
launched in developed countries; developing countries
also started to implement around 1994. A healthy city
aims to create a health-supportive environment, to
achieve a good quality of life, to provide basic sanitation
and hygiene needs, and to supply access to health care7.
The healthy city Wonju project
In Korea, the healthy cities project was started in
Kwachon in 19988. Since then, Korea has developed a
unique program for healthy cities; it has developed a
healthy city act, a health impact assessment program,
an award system, and domestic networking system. A
bottom-up approach for the development of healthy city
policies and plans is promoted9. The healthy city Wonju
project started in 2004 joined the alliance for healthy
cities (AFHC) as a founding member in the same year,
and announced the healthy city Wonju declaration in
200510-12. In 2006, the project succeeded in launching its
  
City joined the Korea Healthy Cities Partnership (KHCP)
as a founding member in 2006. The indicators and home
page with database have been developed to monitor and
evaluate the program implementation since 2006. A 10
year long-term plan, vision 2020 (2011- 2020) is currently
being implemented, and will run until 202011,12. Recently,
Wonju City organized the seventh global conference of the
AFHC, running from 29th August to 1st September 2016,
in Wonju. About 550 participants attended the conference
from more than 50 cities over 15 countries and two
administrative regions. The main theme of the conference
was our cities, our health, our future13 .
Rationale of healthy city projects in developing
countries
While the current sustainable cities debate focuses on
the problems for the world's largest urban settlements,
the majority of all urban dwellers continue to reside in
far smaller urban settlements14. If rapid urbanization
focuses only on short-term economic development
rather than sustainability, the situation is likely to lead
down development paths that exacerbate global climate
change, with a wide range of negative implications for
global health and health equity. The decisions taken by
cities in developing countries should support a preventive
environmental health agenda and a goal of promoting
health and well-being15. There is a considerable need
of interventions such as the healthy cities project in
developing countries16.
In the South-East Asia Region, the healthy cities Initiative
was launched in 1994 with some cities of Bangladesh
(Chittagong, Cox’s Bazar, Rajshahi), Thailand (Bangkok),
Sri Lanka (Badula), Nepal (Kathmandu), India (New
Sharma B, et al. A Healthy City Project...
J-GMC-N | Volume 10 | Issue 01 | January-June 2017page 36
Original Article | Journal of Gandaki Medical College-Nepal
Delhi); a comprehensive review of the program was
carried out in 1998, and a healthy cities framework for
action was developed for the region in 199917,18. Review
studies show that the slow progress in developing
healthy cities was due to unclear concepts among local
authorities, lack of coordinated urban infrastructure
and lack of community participation, preventive services
being a low Government priority, and poor empowerment
of local Government17,19.
Nepal is a developing country situated in South-East Asia
with a human development index of 0.548, and a life
expectancy of 69.6 years20. Nepal has a total population
of 28 million, with an average annual population growth
rate of 1.35%. Estimated per capita GDP is 762$, with a
GDP growth rate of 3.04 for the year of 2014/201521,22.
Nepal currently has 217 municipalities and 3157
village development committees. An increasing number
of municipalities indicates the rapid urbanization in
Nepal; there were 58 municipalities until 2014, 133 new
municipalities were established in 2014, and 26 were
added in 2015. About 30% of the total population has
been living in municipalities21,47.
The objective of the current study is to review initiation,
implementation, approaches, and achievements of the
healthy city Wonju project as a case; and discuss the
relevance of healthy city projects in cities in Nepal.
METHODS
Primarily, the study is a review-based case study of the
healthy city project executed in Wonju city, Gangwon
Province, Korea. We extensively reviewed the literature
and web pages relating to the healthy city Wonju project.
Most of the information we obtained from relevant
published articles and homepage of healthy city Wonju,
and the proceedings of the seventh global conference of
the AFHC. We also searched online website for appropriate
information from Korean Statistical Information Service
(KOSIS), AFHC, and WHO publication. In addition, we
reviewed published articles and documents related
to healthy city projects in developing countries. For
additional relevant information, we searched the website
of the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) of Nepal, project
report of Asian Development Bank (ADB) and National
Nepalese News papers.
RESULTS
Wonju city profile
Korea is located on the East Asia, Southern Korean
peninsula. The total population of Korea is 51,649,552 as
of August 2016, with an annual fertility rate of 1.24, and
a life expectancy of 82 years23,24. Wonju City, located in
central Korea, in the South West of the Gangwon province
is approximately 140 kilometers East of Seoul, and has a
total area of 867.76 per square km25. It is the biggest city
in Gangwon-do; it has a total population of 330,134, with
164,246 males, and 165,888 females, and has a fertility
rate of 0.8% (Table 1)26.
Table 1: 
Indicators Magnitude
Size 867.76 km2
Total population 330,134
Males 164, 246
Females 165,888
Population over 65 years 39862
Population growth rate 0.8%
Population density 380.4 persons/km2
Total area 867.97 km2
The healthy city Wonju: History of development
Korea has national guidelines, local Government acts
and the Korea healthy city partnership (KHCP) for the
implementation of healthy city projects. The Korean
health promotion healthy city act plays a key role in
healthy city project implementation9,27.
The healthy city Wonju project was initiated in 2004
by establishing a healthy city team and a healthy city
advisory committee. It joined the AFHC as a founding
member in the same year. The AFHC is an international
network aiming at protecting and enhancing the health of
city dwellers. The Alliance is a group of cities and other
organizations that try to achieve the goal through an
approach called “Healthy cities” in the close collaboration
with the WHO10. In 2005, Wonju city announced the
‘healthy city Wonju declaration’ to give municipal
commitment to make each citizen lead healthy and active
life through healthy city Wonju. As founding member, it
joined KHCP, national network of Korean healthy cities in
 
with the main objective of setting out systematic policies
J-GMC-N | Volume 10 | Issue 01 | January-June 2017 page 37
| Original Article
for healthy city projects through the effective investment
of tobacco consumption tax. The plan generally
      
and rehabilitation, and setting healthy industry,
infrastructure and environment11,12
healthy city was evaluated through a community survey
and key informants’ interviews. Both processes as well
as output indicators were used. The SPRIT checklist
was used for the process evaluation28. Vision 2020, a
10-year plan (2011 - 2020), includes two approaches:
An individual approach and a socio-environmental
approach. The individual approach includes life style

The socio-environmental approach comprises: Setting,
infrastructure, environment, and health industries.
Here, settings include healthy schools, healthy work
places, healthy hospitals, healthy communities, healthy
markets and food safety, and healthy farming villages.
Infrastructure includes transportation, culture and
welfare, and safety and social marketing. Environmental
planning and environmental education are included
under environment. Advanced health technology, smart
healthy city, and health tourism are included in health
industries11,12. These priorities were decided after
collecting and analyzing the responses from healthy city
   29. The chronological
development events are shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Historical development of healthy city Wonju
Contents Year
Starting of healthy city Wonju project 2004
Joining the AFHC 2004
Announcement of “Declaration of healthy
city Wonju”
2005
Joining KHCP 2006
Enactment of healthy city advisory
committee
2005

2010)
2006
Development of 10-year plan, “Vision 2020” 2010
Organization of “the seventh global
conference of the AFHC”
2016
Examples of healthy city projects of Wonju city
Several setting oriented healthy city projects were
conducted by citizens between 2011 and 2016; 25 were
supported by the city. Most of the activities were focused
on health promotion, such as establishing physical
activity clubs, gardening, and food education12. Table 3
shows some examples of healthy city projects of Wonju
city.
Table 3: Healthy city projects of Wonju city
Name of the projects Interventions
1.
Sport and medicine
center: Evidence-
based
Physical checkup, exercise
prescription, health education
2.
Environment-
friendly streamside
park

dam, and providing various
themed spaces
3.
Culture street project Cultural space for citizens and
pedestrians with amenities:
Installation of fountains, land
purchased for performance
spaces, and building purchased
for exhibitions
4.
Climate change
response education
and research center
Education and research center
Renewable energy exhibition
facility
5.
Walkable city Safe road for both drivers and

with three lanes, underground
distribution line and pedestrian
path extension
Monitoring and evaluation
The Project has developed its own indicators, database,
and monitoring system. The database includes
information regarding demographic, health status,
life style, physical and social infrastructure, and socio-
economic status11. The database was developed in 2006
and updated in 2009. The evaluation of web database
quality was performed; some indicators were added and
some were deleted from web database for the better
 
study30. A comparative study of healthy cities, Liverpool
         
      
used quantitative analysis with some qualitative analysis
for the evaluation and vice versa in Liverpool28.
Awards for good practice
The WHO and the AFHC recognize and award outstanding
        
Sharma B, et al. A Healthy City Project...
J-GMC-N | Volume 10 | Issue 01 | January-June 2017page 38
Original Article | Journal of Gandaki Medical College-Nepal
       
promoting and protecting the health of urban populations.
Based on the good practice, Wonju city has been awarded
for the following works (Table 4)10,12.
Table 4: Awards for good practice
Year Awards Organizations
2008 Good practice award :
Comprehensive no-smoking
program
WHO
2008 Best proposal award : Climate
change and response
WHO
2010 Good practice award: Physical
activities
WHO
2010 Creative development award:
Evaluation of Healthy City
AFHC
2008 Good Dynamic Award AFHC
2012 Good Practice Award: Safe city WHO
2014 Good Practice Award: Woman
friendly city
WHO
2016 Good Practice Award: Out of
school youth
WHO
Investing tobacco tax for healthy city
        
to fund the healthy city project through collection of the
local tobacco consumption tax. For effective collection
and allocation of the tobacco consumption tax, strong
leadership from local authorities, particularly from the
Mayor, was found to be the most important element
in securing tobacco consumption tax revenues to fund
the healthy cities Initiative9,31. The healthy city Wonju
       
local tobacco consumption tax, which has legal approval
from the city council9. At present (2015), 34% of the total
budget for the healthy city Wonju project comes from
tobacco consumption tax, whereas it was 59% in 2010.
Its discrepancy is due to the total budget for the project
being doubled by city administration in 201512.
Strong political commitment
In Korea, healthy city projects have been voluntarily
initiated by local Governments. Support from the central
Government and funding from the health promotion fund
is supposed to boost the projects. One study conducted
         
stated three main challenges that the head of the city
should commit to healthy city projects to succeed:
investing more funds and human resources in projects,
local government should provide administrative support
to implement multi-sectoral collaborative projects, and
central Government should encourage and support local
Government’s healthy city projects. The healthy city
Wonju project is under the stewardship of Wonju city
hall12,32.
Collaboration with Universities
Since 2004, the project has been working in collaboration
with the Yonsei healthy city research center for evidence
based planning and execution12. The healthy city Wonju
      
national and international journals collaborating with
the healthy city research center. It helps the project in
Wonju, as well as those in other cities, with evidence
based planning, implementation and, evaluation of
projects9,28,30-32.
Innovative and enterprise city
Wonju city has stated new concept as innovative and
enterprise city since 2010, based on the concept of
the healthy city. The innovative city zone comprised of
headquarters of the national health insurance service,
health insurance review and assessment service, Red
Cross society, and the national forensic service in Wonju
city. Enterprise city has built medical device complex in
Wonju12.
Healthy city program in Nepal: Situation and
possibilities
The Bangkok declaration held in 2010 on ‘Urbanization
and health’ recommended member states of South-East
Asian region to tackle urbanization and health using
healthy city approaches, which focuses intersectoral
collaboration and an increased role of municipalities in
ensuring infrastructures for health and development33.
Some cities such as Delhi (India), Bangkok metropolitan
administration and Phanat Nikhom town municipality
(Thailand), Jakarta (Indonesia) have already implemented
healthy city approach to address the urban health
problems and inequality in health34.
Nepal is experiencing 3.18% rate of urbanization (2010
- 2015) annually. The population density of Nepal
is estimated to be 180 persons per km2 with urban
population density of 693 persons per km2. However,
some municipalities have high population densities; the
  
J-GMC-N | Volume 10 | Issue 01 | January-June 2017 page 39
| Original Article
than 6000 persons/km2 including 19726 persons/km2
in Kathmandu metropolitan area21. Most of the cities
in Nepal are facing challenges of safe drinking water,
sanitation facilities and waste management, limited
access to quality health services; slum and squatters
settlements34. According to the global burden of disease
study 2015, Nepal is at 158th rank of 188 countries.
Health-related SDGs indicators such as hygiene, water,
disaster, occupational risk burden, mean PM 2.5, malaria,
air pollution mortality, road injuries, household air
pollution, and sanitation shows very low status in Nepal.
For achievement of health-related SDGs, Nepal needs to
invest to improve basic living condition of the citizens35.
The Ministry of urban development created in 2012
is responsible for urban planning; developing and
managing basic urban infrastructure and services such
as water supply, sanitation, solid waste management; and
housing36. Recently, national urban health policy 2015,
 
and the development of urban health strategy is on the
process37. ADB have supported some municipalities to
implement urban development program, for example,
“Nepal Cities: Clean and healthy urban development”,
a project implemented with ADB support in Bharatpur
municipality, one of the fastest growing municipalities.
The project established in 2005 promoted sustainable
urban development through better municipal planning
and upgrading of infrastructure for clean water supply,
drainage, and sanitation38.
In spite of such efforts, cities in Nepal has not initiated
and developed healthy city projects, have not created
any national networking system or joined international
networks of healthy cities as per the concept, except few
initial programs that were implemented in the Kathmandu
valley10,17,39.
DISCUSSION
In the era of sustainable development, “if cities do not
act, the SDGs will not be achieved”. The WHO Regional
        
city must do to be a healthy city: It need to focus on
the poorest and most vulnerable, address water and
sanitation, manage municipal waste; create resilient
health facilities; preserve green spaces and heritage sites,
plan for clean air; encourage physical activities and other
healthy behaviors40.
        
WHO in Europe in 1986, the healthy cities movement has
spread across the six WHO regions, thousands of cities
worldwide are part of the healthy cities network and exist
in all WHO regions7. WHO has developed guidelines for
establishing healthy city projects in low income countries
in 1995, and it aims to develop role of local government
in public health and encourage them to implement health
for all policy at city level39. However, the effectiveness of

countries41.
A key political challenge to urban health development is
the general weakness of municipal structures in South-
East Asian Region19,42. A study evaluating healthy city
projects in developing countries shows that there was
limited political commitment to the projects, perhaps
due to the fact that most of the municipalities had not
requested the projects43. In contrast to this, the healthy
city Wonju project is under the stewardship of the
Wonju city administration. An evaluation study states
that Wonju city was equipped with the resources, plans,
infrastructure, cooperative organizations, and the healthy
city networks, enabling the consistent implementation of
the project based on strong political commitment44. The
lesson from this case of Wonju, is that the involvement
and leadership of municipality in collaboration with
cooperative organization and comprehensive planning
may improve urban health and living environments.
There is a need to generate political commitment and
community participation in preparing and implementing
a municipal health plan; to increase awareness of health
issues in urban development efforts by municipal and
national authorities; and to create a network of cities that
promotes information exchange and technology transfer.
An evaluation study of healthy cities projects conducted
in 2002 in cities in India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Thailand
indicated that the exposure and commitment of decision-
makers, particularly local politicians; clarity of vision
and mission, with a strong planning and management
team; sense of ownership of policies; high degree of stake
holder involvement; and institutionalization of healthy
cities programs, are the factors contributing to successful
implementation18.
Community participation is an essential part of the
process of good local governance, and empowerment
remains at the heart of effective health promotions. These
processes must be seen as fundamental values of healthy
Sharma B, et al. A Healthy City Project...
J-GMC-N | Volume 10 | Issue 01 | January-June 2017page 40
Original Article | Journal of Gandaki Medical College-Nepal
cities and so must be developed as an integral part of
long-term development42. Even though health is the
entry point of the healthy cities approach, its underlying
rationale has always been based on a model of good
urban governance, which includes political commitment,
intersectoral planning, city wide partnerships, community
participation, and monitoring and evaluation41. The
healthy city Wonju is not limited to the public health
         
planning of urban developments. The ‘Vision 2020’ plan
for Wonju has established multiple programs, including
infrastructure development; health promotion, disease
prevention, and rehabilitation, welfare; and improvement
of the physical environment and health industries9,11,12.
Tobacco consumption tax has a dual advantage: Tobacco
controlling strategy and a sustainable funding source
for healthy city projects31,45. As the healthy city Wonju
        
the revenues collected from tobacco consumption tax,
cities in Nepal could adopt this strategy to reduce the
prevalence of tobacco consumption and fund healthy city
initiatives31,46. Healthy cities principles are drawn on the
social determinants of health, such as improvements in
living and working conditions, public education, medical
science, democratic governance, public health practices,
and human rights41. The socio-demographic, economic,
political and cultural backgrounds of countries vary
      
healthy city projects. However, the approaches used by
the healthy city Wonju, such as securing the leadership
      
resources; participation of cooperating community
organizations; multi-sectoral approaches may be effective
strategies for many developing countries hoping to move
forward with healthy city initiatives. Thus, the healthy city
movement can contribute toward promoting health as
well as urban development through healthy city networks
between cities and countries.
CONCLUSIONS
The healthy city Wonju project has been continuing since
2004 under the leadership of the Wonju city administration
in collaboration with the healthy city advisory committee,
and Yonsei healthy city research center. The project
carries out a variety of activities promoting the health of
citizens and sustainable city development, based on both
individual and socio-environmental approaches. In the
last 10 years, Wonju city has been awarded for its good
practice on different areas by the WHO and the AFHC. The
approaches of the healthy city Wonju project included:
The strong political commitment of local Government,
funding from tobacco consumption tax, partnerships with
Universities, a well-organized healthy city team under
city administration, community participation through
cooperative organizations, comprehensive multisectoral
planning, coordination with the AFHC and KHCP and
involvement in research activities for evidence based
planning. Such strategies maybe useful and crucial for
developing countries like Nepal to tackle the existing
urban health and development problems by initiating and
developing healthy city initiatives.
REFERENCES
1. WHO. Healthy cities. Health Promotion Glossary. 1998.
Available at http://www.who.int/healthy_settings/

2. WHO. Urbanization and health. Bull World Health
Organ. 2010a; 88: 245–246.
3. UN (United Nations), 2014. World urbanization
prospects, the 2014 revision. New York: United
Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs,
Population Division. Available at https://esa.un.org/

4. UN (United Nations). Sustainable development goals.
2015. Available at https://sustainabledevelopment.
 13 September, 2016].
5. WHO and UNHABITAT. A global report on urban
health: Equitable and healthier cities for sustainable
development. 2016. Available at http://www.who.
int/ kobe_centre/measuring/urban-global-report/

6. WHO and UNHABITAT. Hidden cities: Unmasking
and overcoming health inequities in urban settings.
2010. Available at http://www.who.int/kobe_centre/
publications/ hidden_cities_ex2010/en/Accessed
18 September, 2016].
7. WHO. Healthy Setting - Healthy Cities. 2016. Available
at http://www.who.int/ healthy_settings/ types/

8. Kim HJ. Healthy City Kwachon 21 Project: A
community health promotion program in Korea. Asia
Pa J Public Health. 2000; 12: S67-70.
J-GMC-N | Volume 10 | Issue 01 | January-June 2017 page 41
| Original Article
9. Moon JY. Nam EW, Dhakal S. Empowerment for
Healthy Cities and communities in Korea. J Urban
Health. 2014; 91(5): 886-893.
10. Alliance for Healthy Cities. 2016. Available at http://
 Accessed 12 Sept,
2016].
11. Healthy City Wonju. Healthy City Wonju. 2016.
Available at http://healthycity.wonju.go.kr/hb/en

12. Nam EW. History, present and future of healthy
city Wonju. The 7th Global Conference of the AFHC
Proceedings - Plenary Sessions II, 29 August –
1 September, 2016; Wonju, Republic of Korea.
Available at 

13. Wonju City, 2016a. The 7th Global Conference of
the AFHC, August 29 – September 1, 2016; Wonju
Republic of Korea. Available at 
wonju.go.kr/ Accessed 9 September, 2016].
14. Cohen B. Urbanization in developing countries:
Current trends, future projections, and key challenges
for sustainability. Technology in Society. (2006);
28(1): 63-80.
15. Campbell-Lendrum D, Corvalan C. Climate change
and developing-country cities: Implications for
environmental health and equity. J Urban Health.
2007; 84(1): 109-117.
16. Harpham T. Urban health in developing countries:
Health Place.
2009; 15(1): 107-116.
17.       
Strengthening healthy city project in South-East Asia.
An opinion survey.
18. WHO. 2003. Healthy cities around the world. An
overview of the healthy cities movement in the six
WHO regions. 2003. Available at http://www.euro.
 
healthycityworld.pdfAccessed 24 August, 2016].
19. Aggarwal S, Yoosuf AS. Urbanization dynamics and
WHO’s “healthy city” initiatives in the South-East Asia
Region. Regional Health Forum. 2010; 14(1): 25.
20. UNDP (United Nations Development Program).
Human Development Report. 2015. Available at

human_development_report.pdf   
2016].
21. CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics). Population
Monograph of Nepal. 2014. Government of Nepal.
Available at http://cbs.gov.np/sectoral_statistics/
population/ populationmonographnepa_2014

22. CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics). Nepal in Figure.
2015. Government of Nepal. Available at http://cbs.
gov.np/publications/Nepal_Figure_2015
17 September, 2016].
23. KOSIS (Korean Statistical Information Service).
2016a. Available at http://rcps.egov.go.kr:8081/jsp/
Accessed 13 September, 2016].
24. KOSIS (Korean Statistical Information Service).
    
September 13, 2016].
25. Wonju City. 2016b. Introduction of Wonju. Available
at http://www.wonju.go.kr/site/language/eng/
Accessed 19 September, 2016].
26. KOSIS (Korean Statistical Information Service).
2016c. Available at http://stat.kosis.kr/statHtml_

Accessed 13 September, 2016].
27. Nam EW, Engelhardt K. Health promotion capacity
mapping: The Korean situation. Health Promotion Int.
2007; 22(2): 155-162.
28. Kang SH, Nam EW, Moon JY. A Comparative study
of healthy city project evaluation in UK and Korea:
Focusing on Liverpool city and Wonju city. Korean J
Health Edu Promot. 2013; 30(2): 93-103.
29. Park MB, Nam EW, Lee HJ, Shin TS. A study of priority
setting of healthy city project indicators with the
use of AHP model. Korean J Health Ed Promot. 2008;
25(3): 139-151.
30. Nam EW, Park JS, Choe EH, Kim GN. A Study on the
application of web database for healthy city Wonju.
Korean J Health Service Management. 2012; 6(1):
219-229.
31. Nam EW, De Leuw E, Moon JY, Nayu I, Dorjsuren B,
Park MB. Sustainable funding of health initiatives in
Wonju, Republic of Korea via a tobacco consumption
tax. Health Promot Int. 2011; 226(4): 457-64.
Sharma B, et al. A Healthy City Project...
J-GMC-N | Volume 10 | Issue 01 | January-June 2017page 42
Original Article | Journal of Gandaki Medical College-Nepal
32. Nam EW, Lee A, Moon JY, Song YLA, Dhakal S. Analyze
the characteristics of the healthy cities projects using
HP-Source. net in Korea. Int J Health Promot Edu.
2015; 53(5): 244-256.
33. WHO. 2010b. Bangkok declaration on urbanization
and health. Available at http://apps.searo.who.int/
pds_docs/B4827.pdf
34. WHO. 2012. Urban health equity assessment and
intersectional responses. Report of the Regional

27–29 November, New Delhi, India. Available at
http://apps.searo.who.int/PDS_DOCS/B5092.pdf
 19 October, 2016].
35. Lim SS, Allen K, Bhutta ZA, Dandona L, Forouzanfar
MH, Fullman N et al. Measuring the health-related
sustainable development goals in 188 countries: A
baseline analysis from the global burden of disease
study 2015. Lancet. 2016; 388(10053): 1813-1850.
36. Bakrania S. Urbanization and urban growth in
Nepal. 2016 Available at http://www. gsdrc.org/wp-
 
19 October, 2016].
37. HERD (Health Research and Social Development
Form). 2016. From Agenda to Action: Urban Health
Policy Development in Nepal. Available at http://herd.
org.np/content/agenda-action-urban-health-policy-
development-nepal
38. Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2013. Nepal cities:
Clean and healthy urban development. Available at
https://www.adb.org/results/nepal-cities-clean-
and-healthy-urban-development Accessed 17
October, 2016].
39. WHO. 1995. Building a healthy city: A-step by-step
approach to implementing healthy city projects in
low-income countries. Geneva, Switzerland.
40. Shin YS. Sustainable development for our cities,
our health and our future. 2016. The 7th Global
Conference of the AFHC Proceedings-Key note
Sessions. 29 August – 1 September, Wonju, Republic
    
material/ proceedings.php 
2016]
41.     
on a framework for improving global health. Bull
World Health Organ; 2003; 81(3): 222-223.
42. Heritage Z, Dooris M. Community participation and
empowerment in healthy cities. Health Promot Int.
2009; 24(suppl 1): i45-i55.
43. Harpham T, Burton S, Blue I. Healthy city projects
  Health
Promot Int. 2001; 16(2), 111-125.
44. Nam EW, Moon JY, Lee A. Evaluation of healthy city
project using SPIRIT checklist: Wonju city case.
Korean J Health Edu Promot. 2010; 27(5) ; 15-25.
45. Do YK, Park K. Local governments' dependence on
tobacco tax revenue: A deterrent to tobacco control in
the Republic of Korea. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;
87(9): 692-699.
46. Sreeramareddy CT, Ramakrishna reddy N, Kumar HH,
Sathian B, Arokiasamy JT. Prevalence, distribution and
correlates of tobacco smoking and chewing in Nepal:
A secondary data analysis of Nepal Demographic and
Health Survey-2006. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy.
2011; 6(1): 1.
47. Thapa G. Government declares 26 new municipalities.
Kathmandu Post. 19 September, 2016. Available at
http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/news/2015-
09-19/govt-declares-26-new-municipalities.html

... Healthy cities as a global setting were introduced by WHO in the 1980s as an effort to address various urban health problems (Sharma and Nam 2017). In Indonesia, healthy cities are interpreted as healthy districts/cities and have been officially regulated after the publication of a Joint Regulation between the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia (Palutturi et al. 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: This study aims to find a model of Health-Promoting Puskesmas in the archipelago in supporting healthy cities in South Sulawesi Province. Theoretical Reference: Some healthy setting thinkers believe that the healthy cities approach as a tool in solving regional health problems is seen as a too broad concept. The Healthy Islands Concept (HIC) is one of the initiatives which has elemental settings to promote health in island people and communities. Healthy Island refers to island settings, one of which is the Community Health Center (Puskesmas). Realizing Health-Promoting Hospitals has become a global movement. Otherwise, realizing Health-Promoting Puskesmas which has a different position and roles and responsibilities in improving health has raised difficulties. Moreover, health problems in Puskesmas in urban areas can be different from Puskesmas on the island. Methods: This study uses quantitative analysis. There were 700 respondents selected as sample. They were the community that go to the Puskesmas or those in the working area of the Puskesmas. The research locations are in 3 archipelagic regencies/cities, namely islands in Makassar City, Pangkajene Islands Regency, and Selayar Islands Regency. The data were analyzed quantitatively using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and then analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling/SEM. Results and Conclusion: Based on the data collection, it was found that there are 7 dimensions with 28 indicators that can form a model of a health-promoting Puskesmas in the islands. Further, the dimension that has the strongest contribution in establishing the model of a health center in islands is the work group dimension of healthy puskesmas with an average loading factor value for each indicator of > 9 so that it can be illustrated that these indicators are stronger than other indicators existing in other dimensions of the Puskesmas models in the islands. A Puskesmas model that is suitable for archipelagic areas has implications for efforts to prevent and improve health, as well as provide quality health services. Implication of Research: Thus, this Puskesmas model can improve the health status of the island community. Originality: The results of this research are expected to be input for the Ministry of Health, the Health Service, Provincial and district/city Governments, and also for society as a whole in realizing a Health-Promoting Puskesmas.
... All cases from Africa, Asia, and South America were promotionbased, occurred after the year 2000, and the six cases from Africa and South America all involved the health and education sector (mostly targeting children and adolescent populations) with two of these cases also including the agriculture sector. The single Asian case (from South Korea) only included the health sector as a coordinating body of earmarked sin tax that was distributed to intersectoral partners [115,116]. Co-financing in Africa and South America also involved financing from international donor and development agencies, such as the World Bank, UNDP, the Japanese International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the Gates Foundation. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Addressing the social and other non-biological determinants of health largely depends on policies and programmes implemented outside the health sector. While there is growing evidence on the effectiveness of interventions that tackle these upstream determinants, the health sector does not typically prioritise them. From a health perspective, they may not be cost-effective because their non-health outcomes tend to be ignored. Non-health sectors may, in turn, undervalue interventions with important co-benefits for population health, given their focus on their own sectoral objectives. The societal value of win-win interventions with impacts on multiple development goals may, therefore, be under-valued and under-resourced, as a result of siloed resource allocation mechanisms. Pooling budgets across sectors could ensure the total multi-sectoral value of these interventions is captured, and sectors' shared goals are achieved more efficiently. Under such a co-financing approach, the cost of interventions with multi-sectoral outcomes would be shared by benefiting sectors, stimulating mutually beneficial cross-sectoral investments. Leveraging funding in other sectors could off-set flat-lining global development assistance for health and optimise public spending. Although there have been experiments with such cross-sectoral co-financing in several settings, there has been limited analysis to examine these models, their performance and their institutional feasibility. Aim: This study aimed to identify and characterise cross-sectoral co-financing models, their operational modalities, effectiveness, and institutional enablers and barriers. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed and grey literature, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if data was provided on interventions funded across two or more sectors, or multiple budgets. Extracted data were categorised and qualitatively coded. Results: Of 2751 publications screened, 81 cases of co-financing were identified. Most were from high-income countries (93%), but six innovative models were found in Uganda, Brazil, El Salvador, Mozambique, Zambia, and Kenya that also included non-public and international payers. The highest number of cases involved the health (93%), social care (64%) and education (22%) sectors. Co-financing models were most often implemented with the intention of integrating services across sectors for defined target populations, although models were also found aimed at health promotion activities outside the health sector and cross-sectoral financial rewards. Interventions were either implemented and governed by a single sector or delivered in an integrated manner with cross-sectoral accountability. Resource constraints and political relevance emerged as key enablers of co-financing, while lack of clarity around the roles of different sectoral players and the objectives of the pooling were found to be barriers to success. Although rigorous impact or economic evaluations were scarce, positive process measures were frequently reported with some evidence suggesting co-financing contributed to improved outcomes. Conclusion: Co-financing remains in an exploratory phase, with diverse models having been implemented across sectors and settings. By incentivising intersectoral action on structural inequities and barriers to health interventions, such a novel financing mechanism could contribute to more effective engagement of non-health sectors; to efficiency gains in the financing of universal health coverage; and to simultaneously achieving health and other well-being related sustainable development goals.
Article
Full-text available
Climate change has become a global problem with many problems directly affecting people's lives. This environmental order has direct and indirect causes caused by the individual and is therefore influenced in diverse ways that may lead to a poor standard of living because of the degradation of the natural environment, energy resources, carbon emissions and the negative impact on individuals' health. Sustainability goals demand safe, sustainable, and resilient cities such as healthy cities to adapt to climate change and its consequences. The paper was therefore geared towards providing a compulsory solution to improve people's environment in the face of those impacts to achieve healthy cities that provide quality of life, especially on the local scale. The paper explains the concept of climate change as a cause and impediment and its relationship with cities and their inhabitants to achieve cities that address the quality of life of their inhabitants so that the concept of healthy cities can be achieved. The research is based on the inductive approach. The research addresses the concepts and criteria that illustrate what healthy cities are and compare them with traditional cities. That followed by an analysis of the standards of healthy cities and a questionnaire of specialists and non-specialists to understand the extent of environmental awareness and their assessment of the mechanism and the design criteria of a healthy city to achieve an operational scheme to transform traditional cities into healthy cities within Egypt.
Article
Full-text available
BACKGROUND: In September, 2015, the UN General Assembly established the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs specify 17 universal goals, 169 targets, and 230 indicators leading up to 2030. We provide an analysis of 33 health-related SDG indicators based on the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2015 (GBD 2015). METHODS: We applied statistical methods to systematically compiled data to estimate the performance of 33 health-related SDG indicators for 188 countries from 1990 to 2015. We rescaled each indicator on a scale from 0 (worst observed value between 1990 and 2015) to 100 (best observed). Indices representing all 33 health-related SDG indicators (health-related SDG index), health-related SDG indicators included in the Millennium Development Goals (MDG index), and health-related indicators not included in the MDGs (non-MDG index) were computed as the geometric mean of the rescaled indicators by SDG target. We used spline regressions to examine the relations between the Socio-demographic Index (SDI, a summary measure based on average income per person, educational attainment, and total fertility rate) and each of the health-related SDG indicators and indices. FINDINGS: In 2015, the median health-related SDG index was 59·3 (95% uncertainty interval 56·8-61·8) and varied widely by country, ranging from 85·5 (84·2-86·5) in Iceland to 20·4 (15·4-24·9) in Central African Republic. SDI was a good predictor of the health-related SDG index (r2=0·88) and the MDG index (r2=0·92), whereas the non-MDG index had a weaker relation with SDI (r2=0·79). Between 2000 and 2015, the health-related SDG index improved by a median of 7·9 (IQR 5·0-10·4), and gains on the MDG index (a median change of 10·0 [6·7-13·1]) exceeded that of the non-MDG index (a median change of 5·5 [2·1-8·9]). Since 2000, pronounced progress occurred for indicators such as met need with modern contraception, under-5 mortality, and neonatal mortality, as well as the indicator for universal health coverage tracer interventions. Moderate improvements were found for indicators such as HIV and tuberculosis incidence, minimal changes for hepatitis B incidence took place, and childhood overweight considerably worsened. INTERPRETATION: GBD provides an independent, comparable avenue for monitoring progress towards the health-related SDGs. Our analysis not only highlights the importance of income, education, and fertility as drivers of health improvement but also emphasises that investments in these areas alone will not be sufficient. Although considerable progress on the health-related MDG indicators has been made, these gains will need to be sustained and, in many cases, accelerated to achieve the ambitious SDG targets. The minimal improvement in or worsening of health-related indicators beyond the MDGs highlight the need for additional resources to effectively address the expanded scope of the health-related SDGs. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Methods: We applied statistical methods to systematically compiled data to estimate the performance of 33 health-related SDG indicators for 188 countries from 1990 to 2015. We rescaled each indicator on a scale from 0 (worst observed value between 1990 and 2015) to 100 (best observed). Indices representing all 33 health-related SDG indicators (health-related SDG index), health-related SDG indicators included in the Millennium Development Goals (MDG index), and health-related indicators not included in the MDGs (non-MDG index) were computed as the geometric mean of the rescaled indicators by SDG target. We used spline regressions to examine the relations between the Socio-demographic Index (SDI, a summary measure based on average income per person, educational attainment, and total fertility rate) and each of the health-related SDG indicators and indices. Findings: In 2015, the median health-related SDG index was 59·3 (95% uncertainty interval 56·8–61·8) and varied widely by country, ranging from 85·5 (84·2–86·5) in Iceland to 20·4 (15·4–24·9) in Central African Republic. SDI was a good predictor of the health-related SDG index (r2=0·88) and the MDG index (r2=0·92), whereas the non-MDG index had a weaker relation with SDI (r2=0·79). Between 2000 and 2015, the health-related SDG index improved by a median of 7·9 (IQR 5·0–10·4), and gains on the MDG index (a median change of 10·0 [6·7–13·1]) exceeded that of the non-MDG index (a median change of 5·5 [2·1–8·9]). Since 2000, pronounced progress occurred for indicators such as met need with modern contraception, under-5 mortality, and neonatal mortality, as well as the indicator for universal health coverage tracer interventions. Moderate improvements were found for indicators such as HIV and tuberculosis incidence, minimal changes for hepatitis B incidence took place, and childhood overweight considerably worsened. Interpretation: GBD provides an independent, comparable avenue for monitoring progress towards the health-related SDGs. Our analysis not only highlights the importance of income, education, and fertility as drivers of health improvement but also emphasises that investments in these areas alone will not be sufficient. Although considerable progress on the health-related MDG indicators has been made, these gains will need to be sustained and, in many cases, accelerated to achieve the ambitious SDG targets. The minimal improvement in or worsening of health-related indicators beyond the MDGs highlight the need for additional resources to effectively address the expanded scope of the health-related SDGs.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: Since 2000 interests in Healthy City Project has been growing fast in Korea. Amid this atmosphere, the need for establishing priorities when planning Healthy City Project and carrying forward the plan has arisen. Therefore, this study tries to conduct practical research on the manner of setting priorities of business valuation standard about Healthy City Project. Methods: The research was carried out with Healthy City experts and government official. And in this research the responses of 28 participants among 37 have been taken into consideration due to their consistent responses. Results: The results of Level 1 showed that the "social & environmental approach" accounted for more than the "individual approach". In the case of Level 2, fields resulted in order of "environment", "infrastructure", "behavior", "evaluation and reflection", "disease prevention and rehabilitation", and "setting approach". Conclusions: The findings derived from this study are first, it is feasible to suggest the ways of establishing priorities as to the evaluation standards for the Healthy City Project and second, the results present the ways to proceed in terms of what tasks should be done for the healthy City Project development.
Article
OBJECTIVE: To investigate, in the Republic of Korea, whether local governments' participation in an anti-smoking programme supported by the National Health Promotion Fund in 2002-2003 was related to the percentage of local tax revenue comprised by the tobacco consumption tax (TCT). METHODS: Using financial and administrative data on 163 municipalities, the authors estimated logit models of local governments' participation in the anti-smoking programme as a function of the proportion of local tax revenue that came from the TCT and a set of control variables, namely local socioeconomic characteristics and the size of the staff in the local public health centre (PHC). FINDINGS: Local governments that derived a greater percentage of their local tax revenue from the TCT, particularly those that ranked in the upper fourth in terms of this percentage, were less likely to participate in the anti-smoking programme. Insufficient staff in the PHC was also found to be associated with lower participation in the anti-smoking programme. CONCLUSION: Local governments' dependence on revenue from the TCT may be a deterrent to tobacco control in the Republic of Korea.
Article
This study is to analyze the characteristics of Healthy City projects to make suggestions for better development in the future. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 38 dedicated full members of the Korea Healthy Cities Partnership (KHCP). The survey tool was developed with reference to the website HP-Source.net. Questionnaires contained items concerning eight areas of health promotion capacities and 34 questionnaires were analyzed; response rate was 89.5%. Middle-sized or small cities are more interested and active in Healthy City projects. Twenty-seven Healthy Cities (79.41%) have full-time personnel for the projects. Twenty-five Healthy Cities (73.53%) set up the project team in the public health center, and nine in city or county offices. The heads of 22 Healthy Cities (64.71%) are deeply involved in the Healthy City project. Twenty cities (58.82%) developed mid- or long-term plans. Only 14 cities conducted self-evaluation of their projects. Twenty-two cities responded that the central government should grant awards to boost the projects and motivate workers. The Health Promotion Fund financing to 10 local governments, accounts for 29.41%. Twenty-one cities (61.76%) secured project financing from the general budgets. One city allocates the entire revenue from the local tobacco tax for Healthy City projects. In Korea, Healthy City projects have been voluntarily initiated by local governments. Korean Healthy Cities are active in exploring ties with KHCP, Alliances for Healthy Cities. The analytical tools found on HP-source.net would provide the database for more useful and meaningful information than simply analysis of current status. Support from the central government and funding from the Health Promotion Fund may help to boost the projects. This study shows characteristic and challenges of the Healthy City project in Korea. The outcomes of this study can be utilized for development, implementation and scalining up Healthy Cities.
Article
Objectives: This study was to compare two healthy cities, Liverpool in England and Wonju in Korea, which evaluated healthy city projects and to reorient evaluation strategy which fits into Korean Healthy cities. Methods: Comparatives analysis was used by reviewing documents, healthy city plan and evaluation report, of two cities. Results: Healthy city projects in two cities, fifteen programs were identical items among twenty-seven but there were differences in seven items for Liverpool and five items for Wonju. In Liverpool evaluation was done by a stakeholder group called Liverpool Local Involvement Network(LINK), while in Wonju by Yonsei Healthy City Research Center. The evaluation tool was two types; quantitative and qualitative analysis. Liverpool mostly used qualitative and added quantitative, vice versa in Wonju. Conclusions: Evaluation plan for Healthy city projects need to be made in the first phase of the projects, instead of in the end. Moreover, it is important to include stakeholder in conducting qualitative analysis for unquantifiable evidence of effectiveness, as well as quantitative analysis.
Article
The Healthy Cities project started in 1998 in Korea. Around the world, public health and healthy cities are becoming bigger and bigger priorities. Capacity mapping is an important tool for improving a country's health status. This study aims to review the initiation of the Korean "Healthy City" project. Korea follows a bottom-up approach for the development of Healthy City policies and has implemented plans accordingly. Korea has created a unique program through Healthy Cities; it has developed a Healthy City act, indicators for evaluating the program, a health impact assessment program, an award system, and a domestic networking system.
Article
The purpose of this study is to introduce the web database for healthy city Wonju that contains healthy city indicators and materials. It has provided diverse information to public officers who are working on healthy city projects and citizens for monitoring and evaluating the projects, effectively. The web database was made on 2006 and was updated on 2009. The new Web database system was designed for supporting that the staffs of healthy city can manage all data update by themselves. The new Web database encompasses more recent information about health city projects. After identifying users' needs and reasons for modifying the fields of data, we added new indicators to the Web database. Some redundant indicators were deleted based on users' requests. The Web database quality evaluations were performed by using 13 quality evaluations constructs. Through all 13 constructs, less than 20% of study subjects felt that it did not satisfy their needs or expectations. Well developed and verified contents of the Web database for healthy city are very essential and important. The database makes healthy city projects alive by managing and sharing healthy city related data and indicators effectively.
Article
Objectives: The objectives of this study was to evaluate Wonju Healthy City project and identify its problems, and seeking a way for its improvement based on the Healthy City project philosophy and strategies. Methods: We used the SPIRIT Checklist that was a process evaluation tool and developed by Alliance for Healthy Cities for the study. We analyzed 39 related materials and gathered opinions on the evaluation result with Healthy City Team staffs, related department staffs and the advisory committee. Finally, a joint meeting with AFHC SPIRIT evaluation expert verified the result of the analysis. Results: The evaluation of Wonju Healthy City project confirmed that Wonju city is equipped with the resources, such as mid-term plan, infrastructure, cooperative organizations, and the Healthy City network to enable the consistent implementation of the Healthy City project based on strong political commitment. However, the necessity of additional complementary processes as well as the application of further improvements to assist health promotion strategies was evident. Conclusion: It is required to improve Wonju Healthy City project that activation of health promotion programs based on the political support and cooperation with public health center and Healthy City project departments in city hall.
Article
The world became mainly urban in 2007. It is thus timely to review the state of knowledge about urban health and the current priorities for research and action. This article considers both health determinants and outcomes in low-income urban areas of developing countries. The need to study urban health in a multi-level and multi-sectoral way is highlighted and priorities for research are identified. Interventions such as the Healthy Cities project are considered and obstacles to the effective implementation of urban health programmes are discussed. Concepts such as the double burden of ill health and the urban penalty are re-visited. Finally, a call for a shift from ‘vulnerability’ to ‘resilience’ is presented.