ArticlePDF Available

A new Lycaste (Orchidaceae: Maxillariinae) from Costa Rica

Authors:

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
After its introduction to Europe by the Spanish
expedition to Peru and Chile by H. Ruiz and J.
Pavón in the eigthteeth century, and the description
of the first specimens referable to the genus Lycaste
Lindl., by E. Poeppig & L. Endlicher in Nova
Genera and Species Plantarum (1833-1835), plants
of this genus became one of the most famous and
popular orchids in cultivation (Oakeley 1993). The
genus was created by J. Lindley in 1843 based on
morphologic characters, separating this group of
orchids from the genus Maxillaria Ruiz & Pav.
Molecular studies used to assess the phylogenetic
relationships between the species of Lycaste and
Anguloa Ruiz & Pav. showed that the mainly South
American group of Lycaste section Fimbriatae
Fowlie, deserves a generic status (Ryan et al. 2000).
Ryan & Oakeley (2003) proposed the genus Ida A.
Ryan & Oakeley to include the former group, reduc-
ing Lycaste to species mainly Mesoamerican in distri-
bution.
In spite of this generic separation, both genera have
been recognized for their beauty and horticultural
value. Species pertaining to groups of orchids popular
in cultivation are often well known taxonomically,
and it is not surprising that in his Essential Guide of
Lycaste species, Oakeley (1993) opened his introduc-
tion saying “if it is not in here it has not been
described”. However, when a good taxonomic system
is developed in countries rich in plants species, sup-
ported by an efficient system of information, taxo-
nomic novelties often appear also in previously
monographed and botanically well-sampled genera
(Pupulin & Bogarín 2005, Dressler & Pupulin 2006,
Pupulin 2007).
Hereafter, Lycaste bruncana is presented as a new
species to the science.
Lycaste bruncana Bogarín, sp. nov.
TYPE: COSTA RICA. Puntarenas: Golfito, Golfito,
Esquinas, La Gamba, Bosque de Los Austriacos,
LANKESTERIANA 7(3) : 543-549. 2007.
A NEW LYCASTE (ORCHIDACEAE: MAXILLARIINAE) FROM COSTA RICA
DIEGO BOGARÍN
Jardín Botánico Lankester, Universidad de Costa Rica. P.O. Box 1031-7050 Cartago, Costa Rica, A.C.;
Centro de Investigación en Orquídeas de los Andes “Ángel Andreetta”, Universidad Alfredo Pérez Guerrero,
Extensión Gualaceo, Ecuador.
dbogarin@cariari.ucr.ac.cr
ABSTRACT: Lycaste bruncana from Costa Rica is described and illustrated. This species is sister to L. tricol-
or, its closest relative, from which is easily distinguished by the lip shape, with a narrow isthmus and
spathulate midlobe, the lanate to lanulose infrastigmatic surface, the pollinarium with a longer stipe, the
subrectangular pollinia and the tomentose anther cap. However, among Costa Rican species of Lycaste, the
most remarkable character of L. bruncana is the twisted column, which may be indicative of a reproductive
barrier. Information related to biogeography, distribution, morphology, molecular data and pollination is
provided and discussed.
RESUMEN: Se describe e ilustra Lycaste bruncana de Costa Rica. Esta especie es hermana de L. tricolor, su
pariente más cercana, de la cual se distingue fácilmente por la forma del labelo, con un istmo estrecho y el
lóbulo medio espatulado, la superficie infraestigmática lanada a lanulosa, el polinario con un estípite más
largo, los polinios subrectangulares y la capa de la antera tomentosa. Sin embargo, entre las especies
costarricenses de Lycaste, el carácter más notable de L. bruncana es la columna torcida, la cual puede ser
indicativa de una barrera reproductiva. Se proporciona y discute información relacionada con biogeografía,
distribución, morfología, datos moleculares y polinización.
KEY WORDS: Orchidaceae, Lycaste, Lycaste bruncana, new species, Costa Rica, DNA barcoding, orchid
pollination.
Tropenstation La Gamba, 8°42’40”N 83°13’00”W,
100-400 m, 3-4 Julio 2004, M. Blanco 2610 & E.
Serrano, floreció en cultivo en el Jardín Botánico
Lankester, 19 Julio 2007, D. Bogarín 3987 (holotype:
CR; isotype: JBL-spirit). FIG. 1.
Lycaste tricolori (Klotzsch.) Rchb.f. affinis, a qua
lobulo medio labelli spathulato, isthmo angustiore
longioreque, anthera tomentosa, superficie infrastig-
matica lanato-lanulosa, stipite pollinarii longiore et
apice columnae leviter torto imprimis differt.
Plant epiphytic, cespitose, up to 60 cm tall. Roots
slender, up to 3 mm in diameter, covered by absorp-
tive hairs. Pseudobulbs 5-7 x3-4.5 cm, ovoid, sulcate,
ancipitous, with inconspicuous spines when deciduous
and subtended by scarious sheats. Leaves two (rarely
three) apical leaves and 2-3 lateral leaves adpressed to
each young pseudobulb, articulate, persistent during
the blooming period, deciduous with age. Leaf blade
petiolate, 5.5 x51 cm, plicate, obovate, acute to
acuminate, with 5 conspicuous veins. Inflorescence,
one to six, pedunculate, to 9 cm long, 1-flowered, con-
cealed by 2-3 persistent, imbricate, ovate, acute,
bracts, flowering usually with a new growth. Floral
bract 2.5-3 x2-2.5 cm, ovate, acute, enclosing the
ovary. Ovary cylindrical, sulcate, smooth, 1.7 cm
long, 3.5 mm in diameter. Flowers showy, from 1 to
several open at the same time, sepals pale green to
pinkish, petals white, spotted with pink, lip white with
purple dots around the callus and pink dots in the mid-
lobe. Sepals equal, rectangular-obovate, acute, 4.5 x
1.7 cm, basally tomentulose, margin entire, straight in
natural position. Petals ovate, acute, slightly crenate at
apex, 3.5-4.2 x1.5-1.7 cm, recurved in natural posi-
tion. Lip three-lobed, 2.7 x1.2 cm, attached to the col-
umn foot, with a rectangular thick, emarginate callus
up to 1.3 cm long, lateral lobes rectangular, obtuse,
thick, perpendicular to the callus, 1.2 x0.5 cm, mid-
lobe spathulate, thin, the isthmus narrow, emarginate,
erose at apex, 1.5-1.7 x0.3 cm. Column with a purple-
spotted foot, twisted to the left, basally tomentulose,
silky at apex, infrastigmatic surface lanulose, the stig-
ma ventral; anther apical, up to 2.5 long. Pollinarium
6 mm long, with four pollinia, two rectangular-ovoid
and two subequal, smaller; stipe 3.5 mm long. Anther
cap cucullate, tomentose. Capsule not seen.
PARATYPES: San José: Pérez Zeledón, Pejibaye, Fila
Costeña, Zapote de Pejivalle, 9°07’37.3”N
83°33’22.7”W, 740-810 m, along the margins of a
small river, remnants of primary forest and secondary
forest, 10 December 2000, F. Pupulin 2654, D.
Castelfranco & J. Cambronero (JBL-Spirit). Pérez
Zeledón, San Isidro de El General, carretera a
Dominical, Fila Tinamastes, La Alfombra,
9°19’19.0” N 83°45’58.1” W, 1000 m, bosque húme-
do premontano, bosque secundario alterado y árboles
a orillas de la carretera, 23 Octubre 2005, A.
Karremans 1076, J. Cambronero, R.L. Dressler, R.
Gómez, D. Bogarín, F. Pupulin, A. & S. Rambelli
(JBL-Spirit). Puntarenas: Aguirre, Naranjillo, road
between Quepos and San Marcos de Tarrazú, 750 m,
9°33’01”N 84°05’01”W, wet premontane transition
to lower montane forest remnants of primary and sec-
ondary mature vegetation, 1 January 2001, F. Pupulin
2780, D. Castelfranco & E. Salas (JBL-Spirit).
Golfito, Golfito, Esquinas, La Gamba, Bosque de Los
Austriacos, Tropenstation La Gamba, 8°42’40”N
83°13’00”W, 100-400 m, 3-4 Julio 2004, M. Blanco
2610 & E. Serrano (JBL-Spirit).
DISTRIBUTION: known only from the southern Pacific
watershed of Cordillera de Talamanca and Cordillera
Costeña, Costa Rica, between 700 and 1000 m of ele-
vation. Southernmost collections suggest that this
species may occur around the Chiriquí river valley in
Panama, which represents the southernmost extension
of the Cordillera Costeña. Plants of L. tricolor have
similar elevation range but are restricted to the
Atlantic slopes of Costa Rica and Panama.
ETYMOLOGY: From the emblematic name “Brunca”,
which comes from the indigenous people who live in
the southern Pacific lands of Cordillera de
Talamanca. Brunca also names the Región Brunca,
one of the socioeconomic regions of Costa Rica that
occupies most of the distribution range of this
species.
HABITAT: Plants of this species grew epiphytically in
primary and secondary vegetation in premontane rain
forest, tropical wet forest-premontane belt transition,
tropical moist forest-premontane belt transition and
tropical wet forest. All these life zones strictly corre-
spond to the southern Pacific watershed of Cordillera
de Talamanca and Fila (Cordillera) Costeña.
LANKESTERIANA 7(3), diciembre 2007. © Universidad de Costa Rica, 2007.
LANKESTERIANA
544
BOGARÍN- A NEW Lycaste 545
LANKESTERIANA 7(3), diciembre 2007. © Universidad de Costa Rica, 2007.
FIGURE 1. A-G. Lycaste bruncana Bogarín. A. Habit. B. Flower in natural position. C. Dissected perianth. D. Lip. E.
Column and lip, lateral view. F. Column. lateral and frontal view. G. Pollinarium (front view, dorsal view and lateral
view) and anther cap. Drawn from the holotype by Diego Bogarín.
CONSERVATION STATUS: The species has been record-
ed in protected areas. The type collection comes from
The Field Station La Gamba, situated in the south of
Puntarenas province, in Golfito. It constitutes the first
record for this research center, where no Lycaste
species were previously recorded (Weissenhofer et al.
2001). Biogeographical similitudes and proximity
between this area, Piedras Blancas National Park and
Corcovado National Park, also suggest that L. brun-
cana may well occur in those protected areas. An
unvouchered specimen in cultivation (J. Clarke 314)
from Boracayán Wildlife Refuge around Fila Alivio
in the upper Río Barucito basin, Cordillera Costeña,
is also recorded from a protected area. Apparently,
this species is not rare and some specimens were col-
lected in disturbed areas. This species should not be
regarded as endangered.
PHENOLOGY: Plants in cultivation flower from May to
July. Some plants can extend the flowering season up
to October.
This species is closely related to L. tricolor, a wide-
spread species from the Atlantic lands of Costa Rica
and Panama. In a survey of Lycaste species in Costa
Rica, Horich (1977) cited several specimens of L. tri-
color from the Atlantic side of both Tilarán and
Central Volcanic chains. Also, he stated that L. tricolor
has no close affinities or intermediate relatives in the
genus. It seems that he never had access to material
from the Pacifc watershed of Cordillera de Talamanca
(Horich1966). Oakeley (199 1, 1993) discussed L. tri-
color as a tiny pink to white flower species with the lip
provided with a marked isthmus, and a projecting dis-
coid callus. All geographic data and pictures presented
in his work are correctly attributed to L. tricolor.
The only record that may eventually correspond to
a first collection of L. bruncana is the “small dwarf
race” (Fowlie 1970: 7) of L. tricolor that was appar-
ently collected in San Vito de Java, a region that is
included in the current distribution area of L. brun-
cana. However, no herbarium specimens or vouchers
of this species were apparently prepared by the author
(Fowlie 1970). Recent treatments of Costa Rican and
Mesoamerican orchidaceae do not mention any col-
lections of Lycaste tricolor from the Pacific water-
shed of Cordillera de Talamanca (Dressler 2003,
Ossenbachet al. 2007).
According to Fowlie (1970) and following his clas-
sification of the genus, both species should be placed
in the section Deciduosae subsection Paradeciduosae
Fowlie. Although the similarities between the two
species (i.e., the three-lobed lip, the deciduous
pseudobulbs without conspicuous spines, the similar
size of the plant, and the gross flower morphology)
could have confused taxonomists in the past, Lycaste
borucana may be easily distinguished on the basis of
a consistent set of morphological features.
Lycaste bruncana is distinguished from L. tricolor
by the lip shape with a narrow isthmus and spathulate
midlobe (vs. ovate), the lanate to lanulose infrastig-
matic surface (vs. smooth), the pollinarium with a
longer stipe (up to 3.5 mm long), the subrectangular
pollinia (vs. ovoid) and the tomentose anther cap (vs.
smooth) (Figs. 2-5). However, the most remarkable
character to recognize L. bruncana is the twisted col-
umn, which may be indicative of a reproductive barri-
er with respect of its relative (Fig. 5). Among the
species of Costa Rican Lycaste, this is the only
species that presents a twisted column (Dressler
2003).
All the former characters are diagnostic and show
no variation among individuals. The length of lip is
variable, ranging from 1.5 to 2.7 cm, however the
midlobe is spathulate in all collections studied (Fig.
2). Small plants cultivated at Lankester Botanical
Garden produced smaller flowers than the robust
plants. The number of flowers produced by a plant
varies from one to six in each growth and it depends
LANKESTERIANA 7(3), diciembre 2007. © Universidad de Costa Rica, 2007.
LANKESTERIANA
546
FIGURE 2. Variation in the lip length among individuals of
L. bruncana. A. from A. Karremans 1076. B. from F.
Pupulin 2654. C. from F. Pupulin 2780. D. from D.
Bogarín 3987. All vouchers in JBL-spirit collection.
Scale bar = 1 cm.
on both the robustness of the plant and the number of
pseudobulbs present. Flower coloration is rather con-
stant, with concolor sepals and petals with pink spots,
however, slightly paler flowers have been observed
among the different collections. The distinctive col-
umn, twisted to the left, showed no variation among
individuals and the individual flowers of the same
plant. All the studied flowers showed twisted
columns.
After the submission of this paper, an anonymous
reviewer suggested commenting on two names not
validly published that supposedly have been used
for this species. Although the International Code of
Botanical Nomenclature (McNeill et al. 2006)
expressly recommends (Recomm. 34A) that authors
should avoid mentioning previously unpublished
names, I found two citations of the name Lycaste
crystallina, both of them nomina nuda, with differ-
BOGARÍN- A NEW Lycaste 547
LANKESTERIANA 7(3), diciembre 2007. © Universidad de Costa Rica, 2007.
FIGURE 5. Comparison of the column shape in L. bruncana
and L. tricolor. A-A’. L. bruncana. A. Upper view,
showing the twisted column. A’. Frontal view, showing
the twistened column and the lanulose infraestigmatic
surface. From A. Karremans 1076 (JBL-spirit). B-B’.
Lycaste tricolor. B. Upper view, showing the straight
column. B’. Frontal view, showing the straight column
and smooth infraestigmatic surface. From D. Bogarín
733 (JBL-spirit). Scale bar = 1 cm.
FIGURE 3. Comparison of the pollinarium shape between
L. bruncana and L. tricolor. A-C, L. bruncana. A. from
D. Bogarín 3987. B. from F. Pupulin 2780. C. from A.
Karremans 1076. A’-C’ L. tricolor. A’. from JBL-
02995. B’. from D. Bogarín 733. C’. from JBL-06408.
All vouchers in JBL-pollinaria collection. Scale bar = 5
mm.
FIGURE 4. Comparison between anther cap shape in L.
bruncana and L. tricolor. A-C. L. bruncana. A. from D.
Bogarín 3987. B. from F. Pupulin 2780. C. from A.
Karremans 1076. A’-B’ L. tricolor. A’. from D.
Bogarín 733. B’. from JBL-06408. All vouchers in JBL-
spirit collection. Scale bar = 5 mm. MAP 1. Distribution of L. bruncana and L. tricolor.
ent authorship. Lycaste crystallina M.A. Dix, nom.
nud., (Missouri Botanical Garden 2007) is ostensi-
bly based on Blanco 2610, designated here as a
paratype of L. bruncana. The other citation, as
Lycaste crystallina Wubben ex H.F. Oakeley, nom.
nud., was found at BIBLIORCHIDEA (Swiss Orchid
Fundation 2007) and refers to a recent article by
Oakeley (2007) where the author anticipated the
publication of L. crystallina as a new species, how-
ever it does not constitute a valid name (see Code,
art. 34.1). No information at all was retreived about
the other unpublished name suggested by the anony-
mous reviewer.
BIOGEOGRAPHY - According to the locality data avail-
able for both species, they are geographically separat-
ed (Map 1). All the collections of L. tricolor corre-
spond to the Atlantic watershed of the Cordillera de
Tilarán, the Central Volcanic chain and the
Talamanca range. On the other side, all collections of
L. bruncana come from the Pacific watershed of the
Cordillera de Talamanca and the Cordillera Costeña.
Analogous examples of sister orchid species in the
Atlantic and Pacific regions of Talamanca range have
been documented in the genus Kefersteinia (Pupulin
2001). These examples support the role of the
Cordillera de Talamanca as a geographic isolation
barrier, where these sister species have evolved sepa-
rately.
Though the Cordillera Costeña and nearby areas
have been explored botanically since several years
ago, new species have been recently revealed from
the region (Gómez-Laurito 2006). A well defined
floristic pattern is present in Cordillera Costeña and
its neighboring areas. Its geographic position, geolog-
ic history and the inherent climatological characteris-
tics given by the rain patterns and humid winds that
come from the Pacific, make this area rich in
endemisms.
MOLECULAR DATA - Sequences using matK chloro-
plast region obtained to assess the candidate barcode
for flowering plants support the clustering of the
accessions of L. tricolor. This species is placed sepa-
rately from the accessions of L. bruncana. The plant
of L. bruncana from which the type specimen was
prepared (Gene Bank accession EU214496) was used
to obtain the matK sequence analysed for barcoding
pourposes (Lahaye et al. in prep). In the former work,
authors concluded that L. borucana (cited there as
Lycaste cf. tricolor) is a cryptic species supported by
DNA barcoding. Lycaste bruncana does not cluster
with the three accessions of L. tricolor assessed in the
study. In conclusion, molecular evidence supports the
identity of L. bruncana, as a species distinct from its
relative, L. tricolor.
POLLINATION ECOLOGY -Lycaste is a typical bee-pol-
linated flower (Roubik & Hanson 2004). The dis-
tinctive twisted column present in L. bruncana
might also be indicative of a reproductive barrier
whereby L. bruncana would deposit the pollinarium
on the shoulder of the pollinating bees and L. tricol-
or, with its straight column, would deposit the polli-
narium on the scutellum. Pollination studies in
orchids around Golfito area did not reveal any
potential bee pollinator of Lycaste species (Lobo &
Bolaños 2005). More observations and comparisons
between pollination biology of both species may
confirm the reproductive isolation barrier inferred
by flower morphology. This acquires special interest
since the two species overlap their flowering season
so, differences in both, flower morphology and the
way in which these species use the pollinator to
carry the pollinarium, ensure a reproductive isola-
tion. This isolation barrier supports the distinction
between L. bruncana and L. tricolor.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.I want to thank Franco Pupulin
and Robert L. Dressler for their invaluable support and
their useful comments on the paper. To my colleagues José
Daniel Zúñiga and Mario Blanco who kindly provided use-
ful information. The scientific services of Costa Rican
Ministery of Environment and Energy (MINAE) and its
National System of Conservation Areas (SINAC) for issu-
ing the collecting permits under which wild species treated
in this study were collected. The staff of Tropenstation La
Gamba for granting access to the installations and for the
research facilities. The staff of Jodrell Laboratory of Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew, specially Guillaume Gigot, Martyn
Powell and Vincent Savolainen, for their help with the
DNA barcoding work and to Renaud Lahaye who analysed
the molecular data. The UK Darwin Initiative for the
Survival of Species sponsored field work activities under
the project “Conservation and Monitoring of Meso-
American Orchids” (Ref.14001).
LANKESTERIANA 7(3), diciembre 2007. © Universidad de Costa Rica, 2007.
LANKESTERIANA
548
LITERATURE CITED
Dressler, R. L. 2003. Lycaste. Pp. 262-264 in: B.E.
Hammel, M. H. Grayum, C. Herrera & N. Zamora
(eds.). Manual de las Plantas de Costa Rica Vol III.
Orchidaceae-Zingiberaceae. Monogr. Syst. Bot.
Missouri Bot. Gard. 93.
Dressler, R. L & F. Pupulin. 2006. The carmine
Trichopilias of Central America: few but badly con-
fused. Orchids 75(3): 212-219.
Fowlie, J.A. 1970. The genus Lycaste. Azul Quinta Press.
90 p.
Gómez-Laurito, J. 2006. Una nueva especie de Justicia
(Acanthaceae) del sur de Costa Rica. Lankesteriana 6
(3) : 155-156.
Horich, C.K. 1966. Lycaste brevispatha und Lycaste tri-
color. Die Orchidee 2: 74-77.
Horich, C. K. 1977. The Costa Rican Lycaste Species.
Orchid Digest. 41(4): 125-130.
Lobo, J & F. Bolaños. 2005. Historial natural de Golfito.
Editorial INBio, Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa
Rica. 264 pp.
McNeill, J., F.R. Barrie, H.M. Burdet, V. Demoulin, D.L.
Hawksworth, K. Marhold, D.H. Nicolson. J. Prado,
P.C. Silva, J.E. Skog, J.H. Wiersema & N.J. Turland.
2006. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature
(Vienna Code). Regnum Veg. 146. A.R.G. Gantner
Verlag KG.
Missouri Botanical Garden. 2007. TROPICOS Database.
http://mobot.mobot.org/cgi-bin/search_vast
Oakeley, H. 1993. Lycaste Species. The essential guide.
Vigo Press. 34 p.
Oakeley, H. 1991. A survey of Lycastes 4: Lycaste brevis-
patha to Lyc. xytriophora. Amer. Orchid Soc. Bull. 60:
634-644.
Oakeley, H. 2007. A new infrageneric clsssification of
Lycaste (Lindl.) and a checklist of species for the genus
Lycaste. Orchid Digest 71: 196-208.
Ossenbach, C., F. Pupulin & R.L. Dressler. 2007. Orchids
of the Central American Isthmus. Checklist and
Conservation Status. Editorial 25 de Mayo, San José,
Costa Rica. 243 p.
Pupulin, F. 2001. Contributions to a reassessment of Costa
Rican Zygopetalinae (Orchidaceae). The genus
Kefersteinia Rchb.f. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien. Serie
B 3: 525-555.
Pupulin, F. 2007. Epidendra, the botanical databases of
Jardín Botánico Lankester at the University of Costa
Rica. Lankesteriana 7(1-2): 178-180.
Pupulin, F. & D. Bogarín. 2005. The genus Brassia in
Costa Rica: A survey of four species and a new species.
Orchids 74 : 202-207.
Roubik, D.W & P.E. Hanson. 2004. Abejas de orquídeas de
la América tropical: Biología y guía de campo. Orchid
bees of tropical America: Biology and field guide.
Editorial INBio, Santo Domingo de Heredia, C.R. 370 p.
Ryan, A., W. M. Whitten, M. A. Johnson & M. W. Chase.
2000. A phylogenetic assessment of Lycaste and Anguloa
(Orchidaceae: Maxillarieae). Lindleyana 15:33-45.
Ryan, A. & H. Oakeley. 2003. Ida A. Ryan and Oakeley,
a new genus, based on Lycaste section Fimbriatae
Fowlie (Orchidaceae, tribe Cymbideae, subtribe
Lycastinae). Orchid Dig. 67(1): 8-10.
Swiss Orchid Foundation. 2007. BIBLIORCHIDEA.
http://www.orchid.unibas.ch/bibliorchidea.index.php
Weissenhofer, A., H. Werner, A. Weber, G. Zimmermann
& N. Zamora. 2001. An introductory Field Guide to the
flowering plants of the Corcovado and Piedras Blancas
National Park (Regenwald der Österreicher). OÖ
Landesmuseum Linz, Biologiezentrum, Johann-
Wilhelm Kleinstraße. 464 p.
BOGARÍN- A NEW Lycaste 549
LANKESTERIANA 7(3), diciembre 2007. © Universidad de Costa Rica, 2007.
LANKESTERIANA
... DNA barcoding has been proposed as a genetic tool that may help identify and document orchid taxa in the wild. DNA barcoding has been used to assess genetic variation in congeneric orchid species (Yao et al. 2009;Xiang et al. 2011;Singh et al. 2012), identify new orchid species (Bogarin 2007;Pessoa et al. 2012), detect illegal orchid trade (Subedi et al. 2013;Vu et al. 2020), and catalogue species richness in areas of high orchid biodiversity (Lahaye et al. 2008). The rbcL and matK gene regions of the chloroplast genome may hold promise for species identification in orchid taxa (CBOL Plant Working Group 2009). ...
Article
Full-text available
Orchidaceae is among the largest plant families in the world; that is why it is notoriously difficult to identify species using traditional taxonomic methods. This problem is especially apparent in the Andean region of South America, a global hot-spot for orchid diversity. Plant DNA barcoding has been proposed to help with orchid species discrimination. However, the utility of the rbcL and matK DNA barcode markers to discriminate between orchid species still needs investigating. The goal of this study is to determine the utility of the rbcL and matK DNA barcode markers to discriminate orchid species from a localized Andean montane forest in Ecuador. A total of 174 samples from the Siempre Verde Preserve, Ecuador, were sequenced, returning 51 unique rbcL and 81 unique matK barcode gene region sequences. Similar rates of sequencing success, rbcL (76%) and matK (75%), were found for both gene regions. Sequences were then queried to GenBank, where top matches were compared to the taxonomic identification of samples. Analysis of 132 unique orchid sequences indicated that, overall, the matK gene region was more robust for species (63%) and genus level (78%) discrimination compared to the rbcL gene region (species: 29%; genus: 36%). However, for 11 of 29 genera, rbcL and matK had similar success at genus level discrimination. Collectively, results emphasize the utility of the matK DNA barcode for the discrimination of orchid taxa and the importance of incorporating taxonomic and genetic methods when investigating the identity of plant species from complex groups.
... Diversity in number, shape, orientation, and packaging of pollinia (including the degree of tetrad packing, the state of the pollini a, the form, arrangement, orientation, and possible dimorphism of massu- lae), as well as the structure, development, or- ganization and shape of poIlinaria (including the presence of caudicles and their composition, a nd the presence, number and shape of stipes), have been employed as sources of characters at vari- ous systematic levels to define taxa from species to subfamilies. The use of pollinaria information as a n addition al tool in taxonomic work is a cur- rent practice at Lankester Botanical Garden (LBG), where researchers make use of their morphological features in a broad range of sys- tematic applications (i.e., Dressler & Klikunas 2006, Pupulin 2007a, 2007bBogarfn 2007, Pupulin in press). As pollinaria are less subject to parallelism than other floral features, their morphology also played a significant role in the FIGURE 3. A. Cases hosting the collection of pol- linaria. ...
Article
Full-text available
The relevance of pollinaria study in orchid systematics and reproductive biology is summa-rized. The Orchid Pollinaria Collection and the associate database of Lankester Botanical Garden, University of Costa Rica, are presented. The collection includes 496 pollinaria, bèlonging to 312 species in 94 genera, with particular emphasis on Neotropical taxa of the tribe Cymbidieae (Epidendroideae). The associated database includes digital images of the pollinaria and is progressively made available to the general public through EPIDENDRA, the online taxonomic and nomenclatural database of Lankester Botanical Garden. Examples are given of the use of the pollinaria collection by researchers of the Center in a broad range of systematic applications.
Book
Full-text available
available online: http://www.iapt-taxon.org/historic/2006.htm
Article
Full-text available
There has been widespread taxonomic confusion as to the Central American red-lipped Trichopilias going all the way back to the original descriptions of Trichopilia marginata Henfrey and Trichopilia coccinea Lindl. which differ in nothing other than name. This confusion has been exacerbated by the use of the name Trichopilia coccinea in reference to a distinct Costa Rican species and the presence of at least one hybrid swarm resulting from interbreeding between Trichopilia marginata and Trichopilia suavis. A new species, Trichopilia punicea Dressler & Pupulin, is herein described to recognize this distinctive Costa Rican species formally. The taxonomic priority of the name Trichopilia ×crispa Lindl. for the natural hybrid between Trichopilia marginata and Trichopilia suavis is also discussed.
Article
Full-text available
A revision of the Costa Rican species pertaining to the genus Kefersteinia RCHB.F. is presented. Phylogenetic relationships of the genus are discussed. Ten species are accepted for Costa Rica and a key to the species is provided, together with references to the types and synonyms, a detailed description, etymology, general distribution and examined specimens in the study area, ecological notes, taxonomic discussion and a composite illustration for each taxon. A new species, Kefersteinia endresii PUPULIN, is described and illustrated. Lectotypes are selected for Zygopetalum lacteum RCHB.F., Kefersteinia alba SCHLTR., K. microcharis SCHLTR., and K. parvilabris SCHLTR.
  • Literature Cited Dressler
LITERATURE CITED Dressler, R. L. 2003. Lycaste. Pp. 262-264 in: B.E. Hammel, M. H. Grayum, C. Herrera & N. Zamora (eds.). Manual de las Plantas de Costa Rica Vol III. Orchidaceae-Zingiberaceae. Monogr. Syst. Bot.
Lycaste brevispatha und Lycaste tricolor
  • C K Horich
Horich, C.K. 1966. Lycaste brevispatha und Lycaste tricolor. Die Orchidee 2: 74-77.
The Costa Rican Lycaste Species
  • C K Horich
Horich, C. K. 1977. The Costa Rican Lycaste Species. Orchid Digest. 41(4): 125-130.