Green and Sustainable Cellular Base Stations: An Overview and Future Research Directions

Abstract

Energy efficiency and renewable energy are the main pillars of sustainability and environmental compatibility. This study presents an overview of sustainable and green cellular base stations (BSs), which account for most of the energy consumed in cellular networks. We review the architecture of the BS and the power consumption model, and then summarize the trends in green cellular network research over the past decade. As its major contribution, this study highlights the uses of renewable energy in cellular communication by: (i) investigating the system model and the potential of renewable energy solutions for cellular BSs; (ii) identifying the potential geographical locations for renewable-energy-powered BSs; (iii) performing case studies on renewable-energy-powered cellular BSs and suggesting future research directions based on our findings; (iv) examining the present deployment of sustainable and green BSs; and (v) studying the barriers that prevent the widespread use of renewable-energy-powered BSs and providing recommendations for future work.

Full text

energies
Review
Green and Sustainable Cellular Base Stations:
An Overview and Future Research Directions
Mohammed H. Alsharif *, Jeong Kim and Jin Hong Kim
Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Electronics and Information Engineering,
Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Korea;
kimjeong@sejong.ac.kr (J.K.); veryoldboy7@naver.com (J.H.K.)
*Correspondence: malsharif@sejong.ac.kr; Tel.: +82-2-6935-2439; Fax: +82-2-3408-4329
Academic Editor: Lieven Vandevelde
Received: 8 January 2017; Accepted: 19 April 2017; Published: 25 April 2017
Abstract:
Energy efficiency and renewable energy are the main pillars of sustainability and
environmental compatibility. This study presents an overview of sustainable and green cellular
base stations (BSs), which account for most of the energy consumed in cellular networks. We review
the architecture of the BS and the power consumption model, and then summarize the trends
in green cellular network research over the past decade. As its major contribution, this study
highlights the uses of renewable energy in cellular communication by: (i) investigating the
system model and the potential of renewable energy solutions for cellular BSs; (ii) identifying
the potential geographical locations for renewable-energy-powered BSs; (iii) performing case studies
on renewable-energy-powered cellular BSs and suggesting future research directions based on our
findings; (iv) examining the present deployment of sustainable and green BSs; and (v) studying
the barriers that prevent the widespread use of renewable-energy-powered BSs and providing
recommendations for future work.
Keywords:
cellular BSs; renewable-energy-powered BSs; sustainable BSs; green BSs; cost effectiveness
1. Introduction
Mobile communication is among the most successful technological innovations in modern
history. Cellular networks have developed significantly over the last five years and now offer
data-oriented services that include, but are not limited to, multimedia communication, online gaming,
and high-quality video streaming [
1
]. The data traffic and the number of mobile subscribers have
also increased exponentially [
2
], thereby prompting cellular network operators to install additional
cellular base stations (BSs) to meet the increasing demand [
3
]. The number of BSs worldwide has
doubled between 2007 and 2012 [
4
] and exceeded more than four million today [
2
]. The increasing
number of BSs has significantly increased energy consumption because these stations account for
around 57% of the total consumed energy in cellular networks [
2
,
3
] as shown in Figure 1a; these BSs
also increase the operational expenditures (OPEX) of cellular networks that are mostly spent on
electricity bills [
1
,
5
]. In 2014, more than $22 billion of the OPEX of cellular networks globally have
been allocated to electricity consumption [
6
]. Cellular network operators also actively expand their
network coverage, open new markets, and provide services to a billion potential customers in rural
areas around the globe [
7
]. Unfortunately, the low electrification progress in rural areas (Figure 2),
which can be attributed to their geographical limitations and economic challenges, has prompted
cellular network operators to use diesel generator (DG) in powering their BSs, which increases their
OPEX by 10 times [
3
,
8
]. However, using DG to power BSs does not present a viable option for those
network companies that aim to expand and deliver their services to new customers [8,9].
Energies 2017,10, 587; doi:10.3390/en10050587 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies

Energies 2017,10, 587 2 of 27
Energies 2017, 10, 587 2 of 27
Figure 1. Breakdown of power consumption in a cellular network and BS [2,3].
Figure 2. Electrification progress in rural areas around the world [10].
Cellular network operators endeavor to improve the energy efficiency of cellular networks not
only to maintain their profitability but also to reduce the negative environmental effects of their
operations. The cellular networks sector has become a major emitter of greenhouse gases (GHG).
According to [11], the amount of carbon dioxide (CO
2
) emitted by the mobile sector will reach
179 MtCO
2
by 2020 and account for 51% of the total carbon footprint of the information and
communication technologies sector. Therefore, cellular network operators are pressured to meet the
demands in environmental conservation and OPEX reduction. Improving the energy efficiency of
cellular networks also poses a challenge to researchers, vendors, and mobile operators because of its
anticipated economic and ecologic influence in the coming years. Consequently, the relatively new
research discipline of “green communication” was recently introduced [2,3].
The green communication initiative primarily aims to improve the energy efficiency, reduce the
OPEX, and eliminate the GHG emissions of BSs to guarantee their future evolution [2,3]. Cellular
network operators attempt to shift toward green practices using two main approaches. The first
approach uses energy-efficient hardware to reduce the energy consumption of BSs at the equipment
level and adopts economic power sources to feed these stations. However, the inefficient utilization
Figure 1. Breakdown of power consumption in a cellular network and BS [2,3].
Energies 2017, 10, 587 2 of 27
Figure 1. Breakdown of power consumption in a cellular network and BS [2,3].
Figure 2. Electrification progress in rural areas around the world [10].
Cellular network operators endeavor to improve the energy efficiency of cellular networks not
only to maintain their profitability but also to reduce the negative environmental effects of their
operations. The cellular networks sector has become a major emitter of greenhouse gases (GHG).
According to [11], the amount of carbon dioxide (CO
2
) emitted by the mobile sector will reach
179 MtCO
2
by 2020 and account for 51% of the total carbon footprint of the information and
communication technologies sector. Therefore, cellular network operators are pressured to meet the
demands in environmental conservation and OPEX reduction. Improving the energy efficiency of
cellular networks also poses a challenge to researchers, vendors, and mobile operators because of its
anticipated economic and ecologic influence in the coming years. Consequently, the relatively new
research discipline of “green communication” was recently introduced [2,3].
The green communication initiative primarily aims to improve the energy efficiency, reduce the
OPEX, and eliminate the GHG emissions of BSs to guarantee their future evolution [2,3]. Cellular
network operators attempt to shift toward green practices using two main approaches. The first
approach uses energy-efficient hardware to reduce the energy consumption of BSs at the equipment
level and adopts economic power sources to feed these stations. However, the inefficient utilization
Figure 2. Electrification progress in rural areas around the world [10].
Cellular network operators endeavor to improve the energy efficiency of cellular networks not
only to maintain their profitability but also to reduce the negative environmental effects of their
operations. The cellular networks sector has become a major emitter of greenhouse gases (GHG).
According to [
11
], the amount of carbon dioxide (CO
2
) emitted by the mobile sector will reach 179
MtCO
2
by 2020 and account for 51% of the total carbon footprint of the information and communication
technologies sector. Therefore, cellular network operators are pressured to meet the demands in
environmental conservation and OPEX reduction. Improving the energy efficiency of cellular networks
also poses a challenge to researchers, vendors, and mobile operators because of its anticipated economic
and ecologic influence in the coming years. Consequently, the relatively new research discipline of
“green communication” was recently introduced [2,3].
The green communication initiative primarily aims to improve the energy efficiency, reduce the
OPEX, and eliminate the GHG emissions of BSs to guarantee their future evolution [
2
,
3
].
Cellular network operators attempt to shift toward green practices using two main approaches. The first
approach uses energy-efficient hardware to reduce the energy consumption of BSs at the equipment
level and adopts economic power sources to feed these stations. However, the inefficient utilization of
network resources can waste a large amount of energy. Therefore, the second approach promotes the

Energies 2017,10, 587 3 of 27
intelligent management of network elements based on traffic load variations [
12
]. Section 3presents
additional details about these approaches.
Most studies on green cellular networks have adopted ideal models. As its name implies,
the green communication initiative aims to make cellular networks “greener” by reducing their
power consumption using the aforementioned approaches. Additional survey information on the use
of green technologies in wireless communication networks can be found in [1–3,12–16].
This study examines renewable-energy-powered cellular BSs as a long-term solution to the
problems in the mobile cellular network industry [
17
]. Apart from offering recommendations for
future research, this study comprehensively analyzes the related literature, the potential renewable
energy solutions for cellular BSs, the potential geographical locations for renewable-energy-powered
BSs, the case studies on the use of renewable energy in cellular networks, the open issues on solar
panel systems, wind turbines, and fuel cells, the current deployment of renewable-energy-powered
BSs, and the barriers that prevent the spread of green BSs. In addition to its advantages and
limitations, this study briefly reviews the current research trends in improving the energy efficiency of
cellular networks.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2discusses the architecture of BSs,
analyzes the power consumption of their parts, and establishes a generic power consumption model
to devise energy-efficient solutions for these stations. Section 3comprehensively analyzes the recent
trends, challenges, and barriers in green communication research. Section 4discusses the renewable
energy option. Section 5concludes the paper.
2. Modelling the Power Consumption of Cellular BSs
To understand the power consumption problems in cellular BSs, one must explore the architecture
of these systems and the power consumption of their parts. BSs act as access links that connect mobile
stations to a core network. These stations cover a cell that is divided into several sectors, with each
sector being covered by a sector antennas [
18
] as shown in Figure 3. Cellular BSs are classified into
macro-, micro-, femto- (indoor), and pico-BSs according to their coverage area, and each cell has
a unique size, output power, and data rate [
19
,
20
]. Small BSs generally consume less power because of
their small coverage range and low radiation power demand [21,22].
A macro-BS site typically comprises several pieces of power-consuming equipment as shown in
Figure 3. The macro-BS operating power can be mathematically expressed as follows [23,24]:
Pmacro−BS = (NSect ×NTX )PPA +PBB +PRF
(1−σMS)(1−σDC )(1−σcool )+Pmw +Pau (1)
where P
PA
,P
BB
, and P
RF
denote the power amplifier (PA), digital signal processing or baseband unit
(BB), and transceiver (RF) power, respectively. The output of PA is a linear function of BS transmission
power (P
tx
) and is expressed as P
tx
/
ηPA
, where
ηPA
denotes PA efficiency.
σMS
,
σDC
, and
σcool
denote
the losses incurred by the rectifier, regulator, and active cooling, respectively, which are scaled linearly
with the power consumption of the other components [
23
,
24
]. P
mw
denotes the microwave backhaul
link [
25
], while P
au
represents the auxiliary equipment (P
au
), such as lighting and closed-circuit
television cameras [
26
]. Given the multiple sectors and antennas in a BS, the power consumption of
these components must be multiplied by the number of sectors (N
Sect
), and the power consumption of
the BS must be multiplied by the number of transmitting antennas (NTX) for one sector [18].
Air conditioning (
σcool
) is usually omitted in small BSs (micro- and pico-BSs [
23
,
24
], fiber links are
used instead of microwave links (P
mw
) to communicate with the backhaul network [
25
], and all sectors
are equipped with a rectifier (
σMS
) and regulator (
σDC
) [
21
]. Figure 4shows the power consumption of
the components of BSs per antenna and sector.

Energies 2017,10, 587 4 of 27
Energies 2017, 10, 587 4 of 27
Figure 3. Block diagram of macro-BS hardware elements [21–23].
Figure 4. Power consumption of the components of BSs per antenna and sector [23,24].
The power consumption of a BS differs from one cellular generation to another [27]. Several
cellular communication systems have been adopted to date, including the global system for mobile
communication (GSM) or “second generation (2G)”, the universal mobile telecommunications system
(UMTS) or “third generation (3G)”, and the long-term evolution (LTE) or “fourth generation (4G)” [28].
Table 1 summarizes the power consumption of common cellular BSs for the different cellular
Figure 3. Block diagram of macro-BS hardware elements [21–23].
Energies 2017, 10, 587 4 of 27
Figure 3. Block diagram of macro-BS hardware elements [21–23].
Figure 4. Power consumption of the components of BSs per antenna and sector [23,24].
The power consumption of a BS differs from one cellular generation to another [27]. Several
cellular communication systems have been adopted to date, including the global system for mobile
communication (GSM) or “second generation (2G)”, the universal mobile telecommunications system
(UMTS) or “third generation (3G)”, and the long-term evolution (LTE) or “fourth generation (4G)” [28].
Table 1 summarizes the power consumption of common cellular BSs for the different cellular
Figure 4. Power consumption of the components of BSs per antenna and sector [23,24].
The power consumption of a BS differs from one cellular generation to another [
27
].
Several cellular communication systems have been adopted to date, including the global system for
mobile communication (GSM) or “second generation (2G)”, the universal mobile telecommunications
system (UMTS) or “third generation (3G)”, and the long-term evolution (LTE) or “fourth generation
(4G)” [
28
]. Table 1summarizes the power consumption of common cellular BSs for the different
cellular generations being used today. The nomenclature n/n/ndenotes a three-sector site with n
antennas per sector. For example, 2/2/2 means that a BS comprises three sectors with each sector
having two antennas.

Energies 2017,10, 587 5 of 27
Table 1. Total power consumption of a typical macro-BS for different cellular generations.
Site Site Power Range (Watt) Peak Power Draw (Watt) Reference
GSM BS 2/2/2 600–1800 1800 [27,29]
GSM BS 4/4/4 900–2300 2300 [27,29]
GSM BS 6/6/6 2500–3700 3700 [30,31]
UMTS Node B 2/2/2
750–1000 1000 [27,29]
UMTS Node B 4/4/4
1300–1700 1700 [27,29]
LTE eNode B 2/2/2 965 965 [24]
The fifth generation (5G) technology is rapidly coming into the limelight, and commercial 5G
mobile wireless networks are expected to be deployed by 2020 [
28
]. Energy efficiency presents a key
issue in the next generation of cellular networks, and 5G is expected to be more energy efficient than
the previous generations [32].
3. Green Communication Research Trends in the Last Decade
Various research projects have been launched in the last decade, such as EARTH,eWIN,
OPERA-Net, and Green Radio. The successful project EARTH attempted to develop a new generation
of energy-efficient equipment, deployment strategies, and network management solutions [
1
,
12
].
Many studies in the last decade have covered a wide range of topics to address the energy efficiency
problems of cellular networks. The environmental effects and costs of BSs may be reduced in two ways.
First, energy-efficient hardware can: (i) improve the energy consumption of BSs at the equipment level
and (ii) facilitate the adoption of renewable energy systems (RESs) as main power sources for BSs.
Second, the intelligent management of network elements can be adopted in (i) network operation and
management and (ii) network planning deployment based on traffic load variations.
3.1. Energy-Efficient Hardware
3.1.1. Improving the Energy Efficiency of the Hardware Components of a BS
Most components of the current cellular network architecture have an unsatisfactory energy
efficiency [
2
]. Most of the input energy is dissipated as heat in PA, which consumes the largest amount
of energy in a typical BS as shown in Figure 1b [
2
,
33
]. Figure 5describes the PA efficiency of various
cellular communication generations.
Energies 2017, 10, 587 5 of 27
generations being used today. The nomenclature n/n/n denotes a three-sector site with n antennas per
sector. For example, 2/2/2 means that a BS comprises three sectors with each sector having two antennas.
Table 1. Total power consumption of a typical macro-BS for different cellular generations.
Site Site Power Range (Watt) Peak Power Draw (Watt) Reference
GSM BS 2/2/2 600–1800 1800 [27,29]
GSM BS 4/4/4 900–2300 2300 [27,29]
GSM BS 6/6/6 2500–3700 3700 [30,31]
UMTS Node B 2/2/2 750–1000 1000 [27,29]
UMTS Node B 4/4/4 1300–1700 1700 [27,29]
LTE eNode B 2/2/2 965 965 [24]
The fifth generation (5G) technology is rapidly coming into the limelight, and commercial 5G
mobile wireless networks are expected to be deployed by 2020 [28]. Energy efficiency presents a key
issue in the next generation of cellular networks, and 5G is expected to be more energy efficient than
the previous generations [32].
3. Green Communication Research Trends in the Last Decade
Various research projects have been launched in the last decade, such as EARTH, eWIN, OPERA-Net,
and Green Radio. The successful project EARTH attempted to develop a new generation of energy-
efficient equipment, deployment strategies, and network management solutions [1,12]. Many studies
in the last decade have covered a wide range of topics to address the energy efficiency problems of
cellular networks. The environmental effects and costs of BSs may be reduced in two ways. First,
energy-efficient hardware can: (i) improve the energy consumption of BSs at the equipment level and
(ii) facilitate the adoption of renewable energy systems (RESs) as main power sources for BSs. Second,
the intelligent management of network elements can be adopted in (i) network operation and
management and (ii) network planning deployment based on traffic load variations.
3.1. Energy-Efficient Hardware
3.1.1. Improving the Energy Efficiency of the Hardware Components of a BS
Most components of the current cellular network architecture have an unsatisfactory energy
efficiency [2]. Most of the input energy is dissipated as heat in PA, which consumes the largest
amount of energy in a typical BS as shown in Figure 1b [2,33]. Figure 5 describes the PA efficiency of
various cellular communication generations.
Figure 5. PA efficiency of different cellular communication generations [34].
Figure 5. PA efficiency of different cellular communication generations [34].

Energies 2017,10, 587 6 of 27
PA efficiency decreases in each generation as the peak to average power ratio (PAPR) increases to
6.5 dB in UMTS and 8.5 dB in LTE [
34
]. Accordingly, many studies aim to improve the energy efficiency
of PA [33,35–38] while maintaining the linearity and increasing the operating bandwidth of BSs.
Previous studies show that the potentially optimized ratio of output power to input power for PA
(power efficiency) may reach as high as 60% to 85% [
12
,
33
,
35
,
39
,
40
]. Table 2summarizes the advantages
and limitations of the proposed techniques for improving amplifier efficiency. Although necessary
for macro- and micro-BSs, these techniques are not employed in small BSs because of the increased
PAPR; the PA power consumption for small BSs also accounts for a small percentage of power
breakdowns, thereby allowing for a high operating back-off [
24
]. High-efficiency PA techniques and
their classifications are further described in [19,41].
Table 2. Proposed techniques for improving PA efficiency.
Techniques Enhancements Limitations
Digital pre-distorted
Doherty-architectures and GaN [24]Up to 50% Requires extra feedback for pre-distortion
and signal processing.
Envelope tracking designs [39] Up to 60%
Requires a very fast and high-bandwidth
power supply as well as an accurate
envelope signal for power supply.
Switched mode PA
(SMPA) [35]
Class-AB 60%–70% Overlap between voltage and current,
which reduces efficiency.
Class-D 70% High peak voltage and limited operation
between 1 GHz and 2 GHz.
Class-F 75%
Realizing harmonic terminations at high
frequencies presents a main challenge.
Practical designs are typically limited to
terminating the third harmonic.
Class-E 85%
Can be supported by a transistor with slow
switching characteristics and is better
suited to high-frequency operations.
A substantial amount of energy can be saved if additional energy-efficient components are
included in the network. However, the aforementioned approaches have a high implementation cost.
Network operators must carefully consider both the operational and economical aspects of these
approaches before replacing their hardware [2,3].
As for the other elements of BSs, the power consumed by air conditioning in a macro-BS can
be reduced by minimizing the operational temperature of BS models or using additional elements,
such as heat exchangers, membrane filters, smart fans, or heater modules [
8
]. The power consumed
by signal processing can be reduced using DSP or the field-programmable gate array architectures
of integrated circuits, which are often combined to improve efficiency. The AC/DC conversion and
efficiency of BSs in high traffic load conditions can be improved using highly efficient converters [
42
].
3.1.2. Adopting Renewable Energy Resources
The economic, environmental, and social sustainability of power sources present main challenges
because power shortages and service outages are strictly prohibited in the cellular mobile sector.
The power supply requirements for BSs, including cost-effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability,
and reliability, can be satisfied using the technological advancements in renewable energy [
8
,
43
].
Renewable-energy-powered cellular BSs offer an ideal long-term solution for the mobile cellular
network industry in off-the-grid areas without a mature electric network and in developed countries
that suffer from continuous power cuts [17]. Section 4presents further details on these BSs.

Energies 2017,10, 587 7 of 27
3.2. Intelligent Management of Network Elements
3.2.1. Network Operation and Management
BSs consume the highest amount of energy in cellular networks. The deployment of dense BSs
has resulted in small coverage areas and highly random traffic patterns for each BS, thereby making
sleep mode operations desirable for these stations. These approaches conserve energy by monitoring
the traffic load in the network and deciding whether to switch off /on certain elements of the network.
Several studies [
44
–
50
] switch certain elements, including, but not limited to, PAs, signal processing
units, cooling equipment, the entire BS, or the whole network, back and forth between the sleep and
active modes [
51
]. However, a minimum number of BSs must always stay on to support the basic
operations of the network. Given that sleep mode techniques are based on the current architecture of
BSs, they can be easily tested and implemented because they do not require the replacement of any
hardware. While switching these elements on/off can conserve energy, this approach may negatively
affect the radio service (coverage) and quality of service (QoS) of the network unless specific remedial
solutions are adopted [
19
]. Under an intense traffic demand, few BSs can be switched off and render
the sleep-mode-based algorithm ineffective.
Several other techniques have attracted research attention. For instance, [
52
] investigates the
multi-radio access technology with the switching on/off approach, while other studies examine the
energy-aware management of individual cellular networks. The cooperation among mobile network
providers in the same geographical area can effectively reduce OPEX as stated in [
53
,
54
]. In this
cooperation, one or more BSs are switched off under low traffic load conditions to manage the coverage
with a subset of active BSs through either the same or another operator, with both networks covering
the same geographical area.
3.2.2. Network Planning and Deployment
Reducing the distance between the user equipment (UE) and BS can increase the data rate and
reduce the transmit power, thereby improving the energy efficiency of both uplink and downlink
communication. Small cells deployment [
55
], relay technique (fixed and user-cooperative relay
systems) [
56
–
59
], and heterogeneous network (HetNet) deployment increase energy efficiency by
decreasing the propagation distance between UE and BS [
20
]. However, previous studies have mostly
focused on HetNet deployments (multilayer network) [
60
–
64
]. In HetNet, a macro BS provides
connectivity and service for high mobility users, while small cells, such as micro- and pico-BSs,
serve low mobility users at high data rates. Each BS type in this architecture has a unique capability,
transmit power, range, power consumption, access, backhaul, and operating functionality [19,20].
Given the short distance between the transmitter and mobile station, low transmit power
requirement, high data rate, and low BS power consumption, small cell BSs offer an attractive option
for increasing network capacity and energy efficiency [
20
]. More than 40,000 small cells were deployed
in 2015 [
65
], and this number is expected to increase in the future upon the deployment of 5G
technology [
66
]. As shown in [
67
], the number of 5G small cells is anticipated to become four times
larger than the number of existing macro sites to cover the same service area. The deployment of
additional small cells in the future is expected to consume around 4.4 TWh of power by 2020, which will
increase both the OPEX and energy consumption of conventional macro cell networks by 5% [2].
Determining the number and location of BSs to be deployed can improve spectral efficiency by
reducing the radio interference of neighboring cells and increase energy efficiency by reducing the
number of small cell BSs [
20
]. Accordingly, previous studies have addressed the following issues
relating to this aspect: (i) optimizing the layouts of small cells that overlay the conventional cell
(macro-cell); and (ii) creating power models for macro- and small cell BSs. Optimizing the layouts of
small cells that overlay the conventional cell (macro-cell) by improving energy efficiency has been
investigated in [
33
,
63
,
68
–
72
]. Optimizing BS size, location, and density has been investigated in [
73
–
77
].
The power model adapts to the traffic load variations in micro BSs to improve energy efficiency under

Energies 2017,10, 587 8 of 27
high user density conditions. The power models for macro and micro BSs at the component level
are examined in [
78
]. A significant amount of energy and traffic capacity can be saved by deploying
micro BSs in consideration of other network design parameters. Optimizing the cell structure of
the network has been discussed in [
69
], which examines the role of average micro sites per macro
cell, average macro cell size, and changes in number of micro and macro sites in achieving a similar
system performance under full load conditions. Integrating the deployment of small cell BSs using
sleep mode schemes can save a large amount of energy [
2
,
79
]. Ensuring energy efficiency under
uniformly distributed traffic has been investigated in [
72
], which shows that turning the transceivers
on and off to match the variations in traffic demand can reduce energy consumption. The type of BSs
(micro or macro) to be added or switched off to achieve an optimal BS density subject to a QoS has
been examined in [80].
Many practical challenges must be addressed in future research to realize the benefits of
integrating small cell BSs deployment with sleep mode schemes, including high backhaul bandwidth
to support increasing traffic, inter-tier interference, resource management, and handover process.
Given that the 5G technology aims to enhance or support, rather than replace, the existing technologies,
the design issues relating to the application of the switch-off mechanism for 5G small cells may also be
of interest to researchers, vendors, and mobile operators in the future, specifically after the introduction
of millimeter wave (mmWave) frequencies in 5G systems.
Several other techniques have also attracted research attention. For instance, [
81
] shows that
cooperating transmission can effectively reduce the number of deployed BSs while maintaining
a low transmission power. Given that PA consumes the largest amount of energy in the entire
BS, the performance of different distributed antenna system (DAS) configurations has been
investigated in [
82
–
84
] to improve the spectral efficiency, uniform coverage, and energy efficiency of
cellular networks.
In sum, achieving a high energy efficiency requires a fundamental change in the design principles
and implementation practices in the mobile telecommunications industry. Using BS sleep mode
techniques to reduce the total energy consumption in cellular networks is generally preferred
because these techniques do not require upgrade of equipment and have a low implementation
cost. These approaches exploit the traffic load variations to turn off certain elements, including, but not
limited to, PAs, signal processing units, cooling equipment, the entire BS, or the whole network.
In other words, these elements shall “only be activated and transmitted when needed”.
BS sleep mode techniques are particularly effective in cellular networks with low traffic demand.
By contrast, only few BSs can be switched off under an intense traffic demand, thereby rendering
the sleep-mode-based algorithm ineffective. Given that renewable energy sources are free, clean,
widely available, and can meet the energy demands of cellular networks during peak hours,
renewable energy systems have been proposed for powering BSs. However, these resources are
unpredictable, intermittent, and dynamic. Therefore, renewable energy systems must be integrated
with other sources of non-renewable energy (with DG or grid as a backup power source) and/or
means of energy storage (batteries) to secure energy supplies, improve system reliability, and prevent
mobile service outages.
4. Overview of the Renewable-Energy-Powered Cellular BSs
Using renewable energy in the telecommunication sector is not new. Since the 1970s, renewable
energy has been used for powering microwave repeaters in remote areas and for connecting remote
towns and homesteads to telecommunication grids, thereby granting them access to radio, telephone,
and television services. Telecommunication satellite stations, rural telephony, and telephone exchanges
can also be powered by solar energy [
85
]. Therefore, the use of renewable energy for powering cellular
BSs, reducing OPEX, and diminishing GHG has been highlighted. RESs are very practical and easy to
install, disassemble, and separate, thereby facilitating the expansion of renewable systems. This section
examines the following topics:

Energies 2017,10, 587 9 of 27
(i)
the potential use of renewable energy solutions for cellular BSs and the system model;
(ii) the potential geographical locations for deploying renewable-energy-powered BSs and for widely
deploying green cellular BSs;
(iii)
conducting case studies on the establishment of renewable-energy-powered cellular BSs and
recommending future research directions based on the outcome of these studies;
(iv)
the current deployment of sustainable and green BSs, which can reflect the practical results of
a green communication initiative; and
(v)
the barriers that hinder the spread of renewable-energy-powered BSs and recommendations for
future research.
4.1. Potential of Renewable Energy Solutions for Cellular BSs and the System Model
Renewable energy is collected from renewable resources (i.e., sunlight, wind, rain, tides,
and waves) that are widely available across different geographical areas and offer important
opportunities for guaranteeing energy efficiency [
86
]. Unlike other energy sources that are available in
a limited number of countries, solar and wind energies are widely used in the cellular communication
sector because of their wide availability [
4
,
12
,
29
]. The use of solar and wind energy in cellular
communication may proliferate over the next few decades because they are well-suited to rural and
remote areas as well as developing countries [17,87].
The cellular BS is fed directly from the RES, which may have either an autonomous or hybrid
design with other means of renewable or non-renewable energy. Renewable energy resources, such as
solar radiation and wind speed, have key roles in selecting the optimal RES design. However,
these resources are unpredictable, intermittent, and dynamic. Therefore, renewable energy systems
must be integrated with other sources of non-renewable energy (with DG or grid as a backup power
source) and/or means of energy storage (batteries) to secure energy supplies, improve system reliability,
and prevent mobile service outages [
8
,
88
]. The backup DG feeds the cellular BS when the RES
malfunctions, when the BS demand exceeds the RES power output, and when the batteries reach their
maximum depth of discharge (DOD) [
43
,
88
]. However, cellular BS are rarely fed from DG because
the reachability of RES may increase up to 99.99% with an optimal design [
89
]. Without any auxiliary
power sources, the battery bank can power the BS for at least three days, which is long enough to fix
the malfunctions.
4.1.1. System Model of Solar-Powered BS
A solar-powered BS typically comprises photovoltaic (PV) panels, batteries, an integrated power
unit, and the load as shown in Figure 6. Connected via an open switch, the DG acts as a backup power
source in the case of malfunctions as discussed in the second paragraph of Section 4.1.
(a)
PV panels absorb and convert shortwave irradiance into direct current (DC) electricity,
which provides power for running BSs and for charging batteries. A 1 kW PV panel typically has
a5m
2
area, and the lifetime of a typical PV panel may exceed 25 years [
90
]. The power generated
by a PV panel may be affected by several factors, including the DC rating of the PV panel,
geographic location or solar irradiation profile of the site, tilt of the PV panel, and DC–AC loss
factor [
43
]. PV cells based on mono and poly-crystalline silicon are commonly used in large-scale
applications with an efficiency of 14% to 19%. PV panels with a DC rating of 1 kW currently
cost around $1000 USD [
43
]. The efficiency of next-generation high concentration solar cells,
which are based on germanium, gallium arsenide, and gallium indium phosphide, can reach 40%.
(b)
Solar regulator charger: Given that the highest power demand in a typical BS is based on 48 V
dc
voltage, DC/DC solar regulator converters that directly convert the unregulated DC output
voltage and current from a solar panel into a regulated output voltage for the BS equipment must
be used to protect the battery bank [88].

Energies 2017,10, 587 10 of 27
(c)
Battery banks store excess electricity for the future consumption of BSs at night, during
load-shedding hours, or when the available solar energy cannot sufficiently feed the BS load.
A charge controller must be included to protect the battery. A charge controller or battery
regulator limits the rate at which the electric current is added to or drawn from the electric
batteries, thereby preventing overcharging and overvoltage, which in turn may reduce the
performance or lifespan of batteries and pose a safety risk. A charge controller also prevents the
battery from completely draining (“deep discharging”) or from releasing controlled discharges,
thereby extending battery life depending on the battery technology [
88
]. Table 3summarizes the
key features of the battery models that are used with cellular BSs.
Energies 2017, 10, 587 10 of 27
extending battery life depending on the battery technology [88]. Table 3 summarizes the key
features of the battery models that are used with cellular BSs.
Figure 6. Scheme of the solar-powered BS.
Table 3. Key features of the battery models that are used with cellular BSs [91].
Battery type Cost
($/kWh)
Efficiency
(%)
Max.
DOD (%)
No. of Cycles
(at Max. DOD)
Self-Discharge
(%/Month)
Lead–acid (conventional) 110–140 75–85 70 500–1000 1.5–5
Lead–acid (SLA–VRLA) 140–340 80–90 80 1200–1800 1.5–5
Nickel–cadmium 400–900 70–80 100 1500–3000 5–20
Nickel metal hydride 800–1200 65–70 100 600–900 10–25
Lithium–polymer 950–1650 90–100 80 600 2–5
Lithium–ion 1000–1700 95–100 80 1500–3000 1–5
(a) Inverters convert a low DC-voltage into usable 220 V AC voltage, thereby making these items a
main element of the system. Inverters vary according to their output wave format, output power,
and installation type. Inverters have also been called as power conditioners that change the form
of electric power. The output wave format can be classified into modified sine-wave (MSW) and
pure sine-wave. MSW inverters are economical and efficient, while sine wave inverters are
usually more sophisticated than MSW, demonstrate a high-end performance, and operate any
type of load [88].
(b) The control system serves as the brain of a complex control, regulation, and communication
system. Wireless modems or network solutions are the most common communication units in
the remote interface [88]. Apart from its control functions, the data logger and alarm memory
capabilities of the control system are very important. Those power sources that work in parallel
are managed by a sophisticated control system and share the load to prevent power shortages,
which are not admissible in the cellular telephony sector.
4.1.2. System Model of Wind-Powered BS
In wind-powered BSs, the wind turbine (WT) acts as the main power source, the DG acts as a
backup power source, and the other components serve the similar functions as those of the solar-
Figure 6. Scheme of the solar-powered BS.
Table 3. Key features of the battery models that are used with cellular BSs [91].
Battery type Cost
($/kWh)
Efficiency
(%)
Max.
DOD (%)
No. of Cycles
(at Max. DOD)
Self-Discharge
(%/Month)
Lead–acid (conventional) 110–140 75–85 70 500–1000 1.5–5
Lead–acid (SLA–VRLA) 140–340 80–90 80 1200–1800 1.5–5
Nickel–cadmium 400–900 70–80 100 1500–3000 5–20
Nickel metal hydride 800–1200 65–70 100 600–900 10–25
Lithium–polymer 950–1650 90–100 80 600 2–5
Lithium–ion 1000–1700 95–100 80 1500–3000 1–5
(a)
Inverters convert a low DC-voltage into usable 220 V AC voltage, thereby making these items
a main element of the system. Inverters vary according to their output wave format, output power,
and installation type. Inverters have also been called as power conditioners that change the form
of electric power. The output wave format can be classified into modified sine-wave (MSW)
and pure sine-wave. MSW inverters are economical and efficient, while sine wave inverters are
usually more sophisticated than MSW, demonstrate a high-end performance, and operate any
type of load [88].

Energies 2017,10, 587 11 of 27
(b)
The control system serves as the brain of a complex control, regulation, and communication
system. Wireless modems or network solutions are the most common communication units in
the remote interface [
88
]. Apart from its control functions, the data logger and alarm memory
capabilities of the control system are very important. Those power sources that work in parallel
are managed by a sophisticated control system and share the load to prevent power shortages,
which are not admissible in the cellular telephony sector.
4.1.2. System Model of Wind-Powered BS
In wind-powered BSs, the wind turbine (WT) acts as the main power source, the DG acts
as a backup power source, and the other components serve the similar functions as those of the
solar-powered BS as shown in Figure 7. The WT can be connected to the DC-power bus and convert
wind energy into a regulated power. Vertical windmills have a 15-year lifetime and show special
benefits for a small power load, such as BSs [88]. Given that WTs are installed above tall trees to gain
open access to the wind, lightning may prevent the use of WTs in rural areas [92].
Fuel cells (FCs) are clean and highly efficient alternatives to generators and batteries for generating
prime and backup power, respectively, that have attracted wide usage in cool areas [
93
,
94
]. FCs can be
used in cellular BS sites as (i) back-up power; (ii) temporary main power supply; and (iii) emergency
power supply. The emergency power supply feed the main elements in the BS site to guarantee the
availability of radio services.
Energies 2017, 10, 587 11 of 27
powered BS as shown in Figure 7. The WT can be connected to the DC-power bus and convert wind
energy into a regulated power. Vertical windmills have a 15-year lifetime and show special benefits
for a small power load, such as BSs [88]. Given that WTs are installed above tall trees to gain open
access to the wind, lightning may prevent the use of WTs in rural areas [92].
Fuel cells (FCs) are clean and highly efficient alternatives to generators and batteries for generating
prime and backup power, respectively, that have attracted wide usage in cool areas [93,94]. FCs can
be used in cellular BS sites as (i) back-up power; (ii) temporary main power supply; and (iii) emergency
power supply. The emergency power supply feed the main elements in the BS site to guarantee the
availability of radio services.
Figure 7. Scheme of the wind-powered BS.
4.2. Potential Geographic Locations for Deploying Renewable-Energy-Powered BSs
4.2.1. Potential Locations of Solar-Powered BSs
The solar radiation at the Earth’s surface is largely determined by latitude, seasonal variations,
and geographical/climatic conditions. Figure 8 shows the global distribution of horizontal irradiation
rated by averaged effective hours when the irradiance power of 1 kW/m2 falls on a plane that has the
same orientation as the PV generator. The region at mid-latitude between latitude 30° North and
South is a preferred region for a solar-powered BS when only solar radiation is considered. The
averaged irradiance at this region, except for the inland of China, ranges from 4.5 kWh/m2 to 7.5 kWh/m2.
Figure 7. Scheme of the wind-powered BS.
4.2. Potential Geographic Locations for Deploying Renewable-Energy-Powered BSs
4.2.1. Potential Locations of Solar-Powered BSs
The solar radiation at the Earth’s surface is largely determined by latitude, seasonal variations,
and geographical/climatic conditions. Figure 8shows the global distribution of horizontal irradiation
rated by averaged effective hours when the irradiance power of 1 kW/m
2
falls on a plane that has the
same orientation as the PV generator. The region at mid-latitude between latitude 30
◦
North and South
is a preferred region for a solar-powered BS when only solar radiation is considered. The averaged
irradiance at this region, except for the inland of China, ranges from 4.5 kWh/m2to 7.5 kWh/m2.

Energies 2017,10, 587 12 of 27
Energies 2017, 10, 587 12 of 27
Figure 8. Global solar irradiation map [95].
As another practical requirement, the electrical energy must be consumed at the neighborhood
of the PV system or the PV system must be connected to the electrical grid. Despite the high averaged
irradiance, the desert is an unsuitable location for solar-powered BSs because only few residents in
this area are using a cellular phone. The same condition is observed in the jungle area at the middle
regions of South America.
If the above requirements (i.e., solar irradiation and electrical power consumption) are
considered, then the suburbs around the town at low latitudes are identified as the most profitable
locations for solar-powered BSs. The western coast of the USA, the northern coast of South America,
the Mediterranean littoral, the southern part of Africa, the northwestern part of India, and the eastern
coast of Australia all satisfy the requirements for installing these BSs. Those regions with relatively
low solar irradiance and favorable economic efficiency are also preferred.
4.2.2. Potential Locations of Wind-Powered BSs
Installing wind- and solar-powered BSs must fulfill the same requirements (i.e., the amount of
wind/solar energy and electrical power consumption). To generate electricity from wind energy, the
wind speed must exceed the cut-in speed (around 3.5 m/s) or the minimum speed for safely operating
the WT. However, unlike solar energy, an extremely high wind speed can damage the wind power
generation system. In this case, the wind speed must be maintained below the cut-out speed (around
14 m/s to 20 m/s) or the maximum wind speed at which the WT can be safely operated.
Figure 9 shows the global wind speed as recorded in a 10-year numerical weather prediction
model run. The maximum power output, which varies along with wind power, may be obtained at
a wind speed of about 10 m/s. The potential locations for wind-powered BSs are largely distributed
in mountainous regions and coastal areas. However, the number of these locations may be reduced
further by considering the desolate circumstances of mountainous regions. Following these requirements,
wind-powered BSs may be located in the northeastern coast of North America, the southern area of
South America, England, the northern area of Europe, the northwestern part of India, the southern
coast of China, and the coastal area of Japan.
Figure 8. Global solar irradiation map [95].
As another practical requirement, the electrical energy must be consumed at the neighborhood of
the PV system or the PV system must be connected to the electrical grid. Despite the high averaged
irradiance, the desert is an unsuitable location for solar-powered BSs because only few residents in
this area are using a cellular phone. The same condition is observed in the jungle area at the middle
regions of South America.
If the above requirements (i.e., solar irradiation and electrical power consumption) are considered,
then the suburbs around the town at low latitudes are identified as the most profitable locations
for solar-powered BSs. The western coast of the USA, the northern coast of South America,
the Mediterranean littoral, the southern part of Africa, the northwestern part of India, and the eastern
coast of Australia all satisfy the requirements for installing these BSs. Those regions with relatively
low solar irradiance and favorable economic efficiency are also preferred.
4.2.2. Potential Locations of Wind-Powered BSs
Installing wind- and solar-powered BSs must fulfill the same requirements (i.e., the amount of
wind/solar energy and electrical power consumption). To generate electricity from wind energy,
the wind speed must exceed the cut-in speed (around 3.5 m/s) or the minimum speed for safely
operating the WT. However, unlike solar energy, an extremely high wind speed can damage the wind
power generation system. In this case, the wind speed must be maintained below the cut-out speed
(around 14 m/s to 20 m/s) or the maximum wind speed at which the WT can be safely operated.
Figure 9shows the global wind speed as recorded in a 10-year numerical weather prediction
model run. The maximum power output, which varies along with wind power, may be obtained at
a wind speed of about 10 m/s. The potential locations for wind-powered BSs are largely distributed in
mountainous regions and coastal areas. However, the number of these locations may be reduced further
by considering the desolate circumstances of mountainous regions. Following these requirements,
wind-powered BSs may be located in the northeastern coast of North America, the southern area of
South America, England, the northern area of Europe, the northwestern part of India, the southern
coast of China, and the coastal area of Japan.

Energies 2017,10, 587 13 of 27
Energies 2017, 10, 587 13 of 27
Figure 9. Global wind speed map [96].
4.3. Case Studies for Enabling Green Cellular BSs
Numerous studies have been conducted in various regions worldwide to help cellular network
operators establish a green cellular network. This section presents existing studies on cellular BSs
powered by renewable energy sources, investigates the motives behind the use of renewable energy,
and proposes directions for future research.
4.3.1. South Korea
Cellular networks in South Korea have developed significantly over the last five years,
particularly its LTE cellular network, which offers data-oriented services. The LTE cellular network
of South Korea leads in terms of technology, reliability, and global coverage (i.e., cellular phone users
in South Korea use LTE 97% of the time). South Korea had 35,255 LTE BSs in 2013; this number
increased 4.7-fold and reached 165,193 BSs in 2015 [97]. Such increase intensified both the energy
consumption and OPEX of these BSs because of the high prices of energy and fossil fuels.
The average daily solar radiation in South Korea is approximately 4.01 kWh/m2, which is
relatively higher than the figures in other countries located at similar latitudes [43]. The performance
of solar-powered LTE BSs was analyzed in [43], which found that these stations could save up to
48.6% OPEX compared with that of a DG system. A PV/WT hybrid power system for LTE BSs was
examined in [98]; the findings of this study indicated that this hybrid system could save up to 48.52%
OPEX compared with that of a DG system. Therefore, the use of solar-powered BSs is a cost-effective
option for cellular network operators.
In June 2016, the LG Uplus operator tested a solar-powered LTE BS with an energy storage
system (batteries) that could operate between 24 h and 48 h even on cloudy days. The proposed
system satisfies the energy requirements of LTE BSs [99], thereby motivating other operators to adopt
green energy technologies. However, the adoption of renewable energy sources remains limited in
the Korean telecommunications industry because numerous issues on the most cost-effective optimal
hybrid power systems, such as integrated PV/FC and PV/WT/FC, are yet to be examined. The supply
of renewable energy to 2G and 3G BSs also warrants further study.
4.3.2. Malaysia
The tropical climate of Malaysia provides considerable potential for the use of renewable energy
resources, particularly solar energy, because of the high amount of solar radiation (2–6 kWh/m2/day)
that the country receives throughout the year. The use of a solar panel measuring 1 m2 can reduce
CO2 emissions by 40 kg annually [92]. Thus, several researchers have studied the use of solar energy
in telecommunications applications [7,100,101]. The integration of RESs into an electricity grid to
Figure 9. Global wind speed map [96].
4.3. Case Studies for Enabling Green Cellular BSs
Numerous studies have been conducted in various regions worldwide to help cellular network
operators establish a green cellular network. This section presents existing studies on cellular BSs
powered by renewable energy sources, investigates the motives behind the use of renewable energy,
and proposes directions for future research.
4.3.1. South Korea
Cellular networks in South Korea have developed significantly over the last five years, particularly
its LTE cellular network, which offers data-oriented services. The LTE cellular network of South Korea
leads in terms of technology, reliability, and global coverage (i.e., cellular phone users in South Korea
use LTE 97% of the time). South Korea had 35,255 LTE BSs in 2013; this number increased 4.7-fold and
reached 165,193 BSs in 2015 [
97
]. Such increase intensified both the energy consumption and OPEX of
these BSs because of the high prices of energy and fossil fuels.
The average daily solar radiation in South Korea is approximately 4.01 kWh/m
2
, which is
relatively higher than the figures in other countries located at similar latitudes [
43
]. The performance
of solar-powered LTE BSs was analyzed in [
43
], which found that these stations could save up to 48.6%
OPEX compared with that of a DG system. A PV/WT hybrid power system for LTE BSs was examined
in [
98
]; the findings of this study indicated that this hybrid system could save up to 48.52% OPEX
compared with that of a DG system. Therefore, the use of solar-powered BSs is a cost-effective option
for cellular network operators.
In June 2016, the LG Uplus operator tested a solar-powered LTE BS with an energy storage system
(batteries) that could operate between 24 h and 48 h even on cloudy days. The proposed system
satisfies the energy requirements of LTE BSs [
99
], thereby motivating other operators to adopt green
energy technologies. However, the adoption of renewable energy sources remains limited in the
Korean telecommunications industry because numerous issues on the most cost-effective optimal
hybrid power systems, such as integrated PV/FC and PV/WT/FC, are yet to be examined. The supply
of renewable energy to 2G and 3G BSs also warrants further study.
4.3.2. Malaysia
The tropical climate of Malaysia provides considerable potential for the use of renewable energy
resources, particularly solar energy, because of the high amount of solar radiation (2–6 kWh/m
2
/day)
that the country receives throughout the year. The use of a solar panel measuring 1 m
2
can reduce
CO
2
emissions by 40 kg annually [
92
]. Thus, several researchers have studied the use of solar energy

Energies 2017,10, 587 14 of 27
in telecommunications applications [
7
,
100
,
101
]. The integration of RESs into an electricity grid to
supply energy to LTE BSs in on-grid sites was investigated in [
100
]. Meanwhile, the use of a PV/DG
hybrid system for rural LTE BSs was examined in [
7
]. These studies underscored the benefits of solar
energy to cellular network operators in terms of limiting their environmental effects and reducing their
OPEX. The Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI) at the University Kebangsaan Malaysia launched
a solar-powered BS project in 2015. On the basis of the results of this project, SERI recommended that
cellular network operators should install solar-powered BSs and shift toward greener networks. In 2016,
Digi operator tested the potential of a hybrid hydrogen FC system to power BSs [
102
]. However,
the application of renewable energy to the Malaysian telecommunications industry remains limited.
In addition, several issues, such as using PV/WT/FC and supplying RESs to UMTS BSs, should be
examined further.
4.3.3. Turkey
The GSM BS of a Turkish telecommunications operator was used in [
103
] to test a commercial
FC backup power unit under actual operating conditions; the FC backup power unit successfully
supplied power to the BS in 256 (out of 260) instances of electric power outages. At the system level,
the FC backup power unit achieved 98.5% reliability. However, approximately 90% of the energy
consumption of Turkish cellular networks is obtained from purchased electricity, which resulted in the
emission of 172,812.3 tons of CO
2
in 2015 [
104
]. Turkey has four seasons and experiences a high solar
radiation rate during summer [
105
,
106
]. The country had at least 12 solar-powered BSs in 2014 [
107
].
The potential use of PV/WT, PV/FC, and PV/WT/FC hybrid systems in Turkey and the supply of
RESs to UMTS and LTE BSs must be investigated further.
4.3.4. India
Approximately 400,000 BSs in India (over 70% of the total BSs) experience power outages more
than 8 h a day. This situation prompts cellular network operators to use DG to power their BSs
and prevent cellular service interruptions. The penetration rate of cellular networks in rural India
reaches 30% to 40%. These figures indicate that 200 million people are yet to be connected to these
networks. Many regions in India have poor grid connectivity, thereby encouraging the use of DG.
Cellular network operators also consume over 2 billion L of diesel, spend approximately 1.4 billion USD,
and produce more than 5 metric tons of CO
2
emissions annually [
107
,
108
]. Therefore, operators must
adopt economical, clean, reliable, and sustainable power sources to address the aforementioned issues.
Several studies [
107
,
109
–
113
] have examined the potential of hybrid renewable energy to supply
power to cellular BSs. Amutha et al. [
109
] investigated the optimization of hybrid RESs that use DG as
a backup power source. PV/DG, PV/WT/DG, PV/WT/DG/FC, PV/WT/FC, and PV/WT hybrid
power systems have also been examined in previous studies. The HOMER simulation results show
that the hybrid PV/WT/battery/FC/DG is the most economically feasible configuration for GSM BSs
with a net present cost (NPC) of $75,515. In the same context, the authors of [
110
] explored the hybrid
PV/WT system for UMTS BSs. Although India has over 3360 solar-powered BSs [
107
], cellular network
operators must still shift toward green cellular networks. Moreover, supplying UMTS and LTE BSs
with the required energy based on various hybrid RESs should still be addressed.
4.3.5. Bangladesh
Bangladesh has over 36,679 GSM BSs; among which, 14% lack access to grid electricity.
The DG–battery hybrid system feeds 81% of all off-grid sites in the country [
114
]. Literature [
114
] also
indicates that cellular networks in Bangladesh are likely to consume as much as 642 million kWh of
energy. In the same context, GSMA estimates that implementing green technology solutions can save
up to 90 million USD.
The potential of using renewable energy was explored in [
115
], which found that solar power
is the most suitable alternative power source for off-grid telecommunications systems and for grid

Energies 2017,10, 587 15 of 27
areas that frequently experience power failure. A feasibility study conducted on a solar PV system in
grid-connected BS sites was presented in [
116
]. To achieve the most economically feasible configuration,
BSs in Bangladesh must have 2.5 kW PV and sixteen batteries in two parallel strings, as well as
two 4 kW DGs
with an energy cost of $1.657/kWh. Over 521 solar-powered BSs have been installed
in Bangladesh [
107
], and cellular network operators must further increase this number. The PV/WT
hybrid power system also warrants further investigation because the annual average wind speed along
the coastal area of Bangladesh exceeds 5 m/s at a height of 30 m [
115
]. Both UMTS and LTE BSs must
also be considered.
4.3.6. Pakistan
Pakistan exhibits considerable potential in using solar energy due to its average daily insulation
that ranges from 4 kWh/m
2
to 5.3 kWh/m
2
. Such insulation is particularly high in southwestern
provinces with highly suitable conditions for accumulating solar energy. Pakistan experiences 8 h to
8.5 h of sunlight daily or approximately 3000 h annually [
117
], and wind speed may exceed 7 m/s
to 8 m/s [
87
,
118
]. However, the green initiatives of the Pakistani telecommunications sector require
further development; this sector also depends largely on DG to supply power to its off-grid BSs,
and fossil fuel costs account for 64% and 56% of the OPEX in off- and on-grid sites, respectively [
87
].
Imtiaz et al. [118]
proposed a hybrid PV/DG system design for a GSM BS. The HOMER simulation
results show that 6 kW PV, 2 kW DG, and eight 200Ah batteries comprise the optimal combination
of energy system components. However, Asif et al. [
119
] identified 5 kW PV, 3 kW DG, and sixteen
225Ah batteries as the optimal combination for PV/DG system components; 1 kW WT, 3 kW DG,
and twenty-four 225Ah batteries for WT/DG system components; and 5 kW PV, 5 kW WT, and 5 kW
DG for PV/WT/DG system components.
Despite the aforementioned initiatives and continuous support from the government for a shift
toward renewable energy use, the number of solar-powered BSs in Pakistan remains below the 602
GSM BSs recorded in 2014 [
107
]. However, many cellular network operators continuously attempt
to increase the number of green BSs [
87
]. Both UMTS and LTE BSs must also be considered in their
future plans.
4.3.7. Nigeria
The electric power infrastructure in Nigeria negatively affects the expansion of cellular network
coverage and significantly influences the OPEX of cellular telecommunications systems because of
the unavailability of grid power supply. Approximately 11,692 mobile sites in Nigeria are connected
to the national grid, and 9%, 10% and 81% of these sites experience up to 6, 6–12, and over 12 h
grid outage/day; by contrast, 12,560 sites in the country are completely off-grid [
120
]. The uncertain
availability of power has driven network operators to use DG, which consumes over 500 million L
of diesel and emit 1.3 million metric tons of CO
2
annually [
120
]. Nigeria has an average monthly
solar radiation of 5.8 kWh/m
2
per day and an average daily sunshine of 6 h [
121
]. The country has
an annual average wind speed of approximately 2 m/s in the coastal region and 4 m/s in the far
northern region [122].
Several studies [
120
,
123
–
127
] have attempted to encourage a shift toward renewable technologies.
Wa et al. [
120
] studied the optimization of various hybrid RESs, including PV/DG and PV/WT/DG
hybrid systems. The HOMER simulation results indicate that the most economically feasible configuration
is the PV/DG system with an NPC of 69,811 USD and an electricity cost of 0.409 USD per unit. However,
considering that most African countries have a high solar radiation rate (Section 4.2.1), these countries are
encouraged to use solar power in other industrial sectors aside from telecommunications.
Vodacom, a cellular operator in the Democratic Republic of Congo, spends over 5 million
USD annually for its 157 diesel-powered BSs (approximately 32,000 USD per BS annually) [
128
].
Kusakana et al. [9]
examined the potential of PV, WT, and PV/WT as primary energy sources for remote
GSM BSs in Congo. The NPC of a PV system may reach as low as $8336 annually, whereas that of wind

Energies 2017,10, 587 16 of 27
and diesel systems may reach as high as $11,420 and $29,773 annually, respectively. The optimization
of various RESs (PV/DG/battery, PV/WT/battery, PV/battery, and PV/FC/electrolyzer/battery)
for UMTS BSs in the urban and rural areas of Nepal was explored in [
89
,
129
], and the hybrid
PV/DG/battery and PV/FC/electrolyzer/battery present the most feasible solutions for these two
areas, respectively. Martínez-Díaz et al. [
130
] examined the potential of RESs, PV/DG, WT/DG,
and PV/WT/DG in providing power to GSM BSs in Spain. They identified PV/DG as the most
economically feasible solution with an energy cost of €0.436/kWh.
Salih et al. [
131
] studied the potential of RESs (stand-alone PV, PV/DG, and PV/WT/DG) to power
remote GSM BSs in Sudan, and identified PV/DG as the most economically feasible configuration
with an energy cost of1.157 USD/kWh. Hossam et al. [
132
] designed four hybrid RESs for GSM BSs in
Cairo, Egypt and proposed the use of a PV/electrical grid in urban areas; PV, PV/DG, and PV/DG in
remote areas; and DG on cloudy days. The energy costs of PV/electrical grid, PV/DG (on cloudy days),
PV, and PV/DG reach as low as $0.1, $0.21, $0.29 and $0.31/kWh, respectively. Therefore, the use
of PV/DG on cloudy days is the most economically feasible configuration, and the optimal system
architecture comprises 18 kW PV array, 10 kW DG, and 1400Ah battery with a nominal voltage of 6 V.
Belkhiri et al. [
133
] studied an optimized PV/WT hybrid power system for UMTS BSs in Algiers,
Constantine, Ghardaia, and Adrar, and recorded energy costs of $0.417, $0.371, $0.325 and $0.285/kWh,
respectively in these areas. The power system for Ardrar with 3 kW PV array, 1 kW WT,
and 16 T-105
batteries achieves the lowest energy cost. Kaldellis et al. [
134
] designed a solar-powered system
with DG as a backup power source for a GSM cellular network in Greece. The proposed system
can effectively address the lack of energy in remote BSs in Greece given its high reliability and low
maintenance requirements in considering the tilt angle of optimum PV panels.
Giuseppe et al. [135]
proposed two discrete-time Markov chain models for achieving the dimension of the solar power
(PV panel size and battery capacity) supply of an LTE macro BS in southern and northern Italy,
and found that seasonal behavior significantly influences the dimensioning process. Therefore,
both irradiance and battery charge must be carefully selected.
In [
136
,
137
], a hybrid solar-grid (or solar–diesel) power system achieved higher energy savings
than a purely solar-powered system or a traditional power-grid system over a 10-year period in
south European cities (e.g., Torino in Italy) and in locations close to the tropics (e.g., Aswan in Egypt).
A framework for estimating the probability of power outage in solar-powered cellular BSs in San Diego,
USA and Jaipur, India was proposed in [
138
], which presented the harvested solar energy, BS load,
and battery levels as discrete-time Markov processes. To demonstrate its effectiveness, the proposed
model was then compared with the simulation results using empirical traces of solar energy and
load data. A framework for avoiding power outages and improving the QoS of a network of off-grid
solar-powered BSs was proposed in [
139
]. Actual BS deployment data and solar energy traces were
used in the evaluation, which demonstrated that the proposed framework outperformed existing
benchmarks in terms of reducing power outages and ensuring good delay performance.
The application of FC-based hybrid renewable energy systems to off-grid telecommunications
stations was evaluated in [
94
,
140
] using data collected from 6 of the 13 sites tested during the
deployment of an EU-funded project. A hybrid solar–hydrogen system (hybridized with batteries)
was tested in [
93
] to determine its remote telecommunications application potential in Eureka, Canada,
which typically experiences extremely cold climate. A case study of 2 kW polymer electrolyte
membrane FCs was then conducted to test whether the proposed model could fulfill the load
requirements of a telecommunications BS. Off-grid hybrid systems based on the integration of
hydrogen technologies into battery and wind/solar power technologies were proposed in [
141
]
to meet the energy requirements of remote telecommunications BSs in the UK. A hybrid configuration
of hydrogen and battery technologies can continuously transfer power from an off-grid PV or wind
power source to a telecommunications BS. Despite the use of FC-based technology and the integration
of various components, the models proposed in the literature have only exhibited acceptable stability
and reliability levels. Table 4summarizes issues that should be considered in future research.

Energies 2017,10, 587 17 of 27
Table 4. Case studies of enabling green cellular BS and open issues.
Case Study Storage and
Support System
Renewable Energy System
Results Open Issues
PV WT PV/WT PV/FC
South Korea
[43,98]
Batteries
DG √ √ The PV system is the most economically feasible configuration for LTE BSs
with 7.5 kW PV, 64 units of batteries (Trojan L16P), and annual OPEX savings
of up to 48.6%.
•Hybrid PV/FC
•Hybrid PV/WT/FC
•Renewable-energy-powered 2G
and 3G BSs
Malaysia
[7,100]
Batteries Electric
grid √ √ √
The PV/WT system is the most economically feasible configuration for LTE
BSs in urban areas with 2 kW PV, 1 kW WT, 3 units of batteries (Trojan L16P),
1 kW electric grid, and annual OPEX savings of up to 39%. The PV system for
LTE BSs in remote areas has annual OPEX savings of up to 43%, 2 kW PV,
4 units of batteries (Trojan L16P), and 1 kW DG.
•Hybrid PV/FC
•Hybrid PV/WT/FC
•Renewable-energy-powered 2G
and 3G BSs
India [109]Batteries
DG √ √ √ √ The PV/WT/FC system is the most economically feasible configuration for
GSM BSs with NPCs of $75,515, 2 kW PV, 3 kW WT, 2 kW FC, and 2 kW DG. •Renewable-energy-powered 3G
and 4G BSs
Bangladesh
[116]
Batteries
DG √2.5 kW PV, 16 batteries in 2 parallel strings, and 4 kW DG are the most
economically feasible configurations for GSM BSs with an energy cost of
$1.657/kWh.
•Hybrid PV/WT
•Hybrid PV/FC
•Hybrid PV/WT/FC
•Renewable-energy-powered 3G
and 4G BSs
Pakistan
[119]
Batteries
DG √ √ √ The PV/WT system is the most economically feasible configuration for GSM
BSs with an energy cost of $0.839/kWh, 5 kW PV, 1 kW WT, 16 units of
batteries, and 3 kW DG.
•Hybrid PV/FC
•Hybrid PV/WT/FC
•Renewable-energy-powered 3G
and 4G BSs
Nigeria
[120]
Batteries
DG √ √ The PV system is the most economically feasible configuration for GSM BSs
with an energy cost of $0.409/kWh, 10 kW PV, 64 units of batteries (Trojan
L16P), and 5.5 kW DG.
•Hybrid PV/WT/FC
•Renewable-energy-powered 3G
and 4G BSs

Energies 2017,10, 587 18 of 27
Table 4. Cont.
Case Study Storage and
Support System
Renewable Energy System
Results Open Issues
PV WT PV/WT PV/FC
Egypt [132]Batteries
DG √
The PV/electrical grid system is the most economically feasible configuration
for GSM BSs in urban areas with an energy cost of $0.1/kWh, 18 kW PV,
and 1400Ah batteries, while the PV/DG system with a DG running at cloudy
days is the most economically feasible configuration for GSM BSs in rural areas
with an energy cost of $0.12/kWh.
•Hybrid PV/WT
•Hybrid PV/FC
•Hybrid PV/WT/FC
•Renewable-energy-powered 3G
and 4G BSs
Sudan [131]Batteries
DG √ √
The PV system is the most economically feasible configuration for GSM BSs with
an energy cost of $1.157/kWh, 5.7 kW PV, 72 units of batteries, and 5.6 kW DG.
•Hybrid PV/FC
•Hybrid PV/WT/FC
•Renewable-energy-powered 3G
and 4G BSs
Algeria
[133]
Batteries
DG √3 kW PV, 1 kW WT, and 16 batteries (T-105) are the most economically feasible
configurations for UMTS BSs with an energy cost of $0.285/kWh.
•PV system
•Hybrid PV/FC
•Hybrid PV/WT/FC
•Renewable-energy-powered 2G
and 4G BSs
Democratic
Republic of
Congo [9]
Batteries
DG √ √ √ The PV system is the most economically feasible configuration for GSM BSs
with an annual NPC of $8336, 18 kW PV, and 131 units of batteries.
•Hybrid PV/FC
•Hybrid PV/WT/FC
•Renewable-energy-powered 3G
and 4G BSs
Nepal [129]Batteries
DG √ √ √ √ The PV and PV/FC systems are the most economically feasible configurations
for the GSM BSs in urban and remote areas, respectively.
•Hybrid PV/WT/FC
•Renewable-energy-powered 3G
and 4G BSs
Spain [130]Batteries
DG √ √ √
The PV system is the most economically feasible configuration for GSM BSs with
an energy cost of €0.436/kWh, 2.5 kW PV, 12 units of batteries, and 2 kW DG.
•Hybrid PV/FC
•Hybrid PV/WT/FC
•Renewable-energy-powered 3G
and 4G BSs

Energies 2017,10, 587 19 of 27
4.4. Current Status for Deploying Green Cellular BSs
Figure 10 shows the deployment and locations of green cellular BSs around the world.
GSMA predicted that the number of green BSs would increase to 389,800 by 2020 [
8
], which reflects
the growing awareness of cellular network operators about the significant economic and ecological
influence of their networks in the coming years.
Energies 2017, 10, 587 19 of 27
4.4. Current Status for Deploying Green Cellular BSs
Figure 10 shows the deployment and locations of green cellular BSs around the world. GSMA
predicted that the number of green BSs would increase to 389,800 by 2020 [8], which reflects the
growing awareness of cellular network operators about the significant economic and ecological
influence of their networks in the coming years.
Figure 10. Worldwide deployment of green cellular BSs [107].
Figure 10 reveals that many cellular network operators in the world have still not shifted toward
green cellular BS. Most of these operators are located in developing countries with limited electricity
supply and unreliable electric grids. The financial issues in these countries must be investigated further.
4.5. Barriers that Hinder the Spread of Green Cellular BSs and Potential Solutions
Table 5 summarizes the technical and non-technical challenges that hinder the widespread
deployment of renewable-energy-powered BSs as well as proposes some potential solutions to
these barriers.
Table 5. Barriers that hinder the spread of green BSs and potential solutions.
Barrier Description Recommendations
CAPEX and
OPEX
RESs have a higher CAPEX than traditional
power systems. These systems have many
expensive components, especially the PV
panels. However, the CAPEX for PV panels
decreased by around 40% between 2009 and
2013 because of technical advancements, and
these expenditures are expected to decrease
continuously in the future [107].
The long-term OPEX for RESs throughout the
10-year lifetime of BSs [43] is lower than that of
traditional power systems because of the low
operation, maintenance, and replacement costs
of the former. Each component of RESs has a
salvage value at the end of the project lifetime
and typically applies to those components
which lifetimes are longer than the project
lifecycle, such as PV, WT, inverter, and
converter.
The successful deployment of RESs
requires meticulous planning to
determine the appropriate geographic
locations on which the solar, wind, or
hybrid power system will be deployed.
The optimal sizes of their components
must be carefully selected.
The PV system must be installed in
locations with an abundant supply of
solar radiation as shown in Section 4.2.1.
The WT system is ideally installed in
areas with high wind speeds as shown in
Section 4.2.2, while the PV/WT hybrid
system is ideally installed in locations
with high wind speeds and an abundant
supply of solar radiation.
Renewable
energy
resources
RESs heavily depend on natural resources that
can be unpredictable, intermittent, and
dynamic. Therefore, these systems must be
integrated with other sources of
(1) Use a battery bank that can feed BSs
for a sufficient number of days
without relying on auxiliary power
sources.
Figure 10. Worldwide deployment of green cellular BSs [107].
Figure 10 reveals that many cellular network operators in the world have still not shifted toward
green cellular BS. Most of these operators are located in developing countries with limited electricity
supply and unreliable electric grids. The financial issues in these countries must be investigated further.
4.5. Barriers that Hinder the Spread of Green Cellular BSs and Potential Solutions
Table 5summarizes the technical and non-technical challenges that hinder the widespread
deployment of renewable-energy-powered BSs as well as proposes some potential solutions to
these barriers.
Table 5. Barriers that hinder the spread of green BSs and potential solutions.
Barrier Description Recommendations
CAPEX and
OPEX
RESs have a higher CAPEX than traditional power
systems. These systems have many expensive
components, especially the PV panels. However,
the CAPEX for PV panels decreased by around 40%
between 2009 and 2013 because of technical
advancements, and these expenditures are expected
to decrease continuously in the future [107].
The long-term OPEX for RESs throughout the 10-year
lifetime of BSs [43] is lower than that of traditional
power systems because of the low operation,
maintenance, and replacement costs of the former.
Each component of RESs has a salvage value at the
end of the project lifetime and typically applies to
those components which lifetimes are longer than the
project lifecycle, such as PV, WT, inverter,
and converter.
The successful deployment of RESs requires
meticulous planning to determine the
appropriate geographic locations on which the
solar, wind, or hybrid power system will be
deployed. The optimal sizes of their components
must be carefully selected.
The PV system must be installed in locations with
an abundant supply of solar radiation as shown
in Section 4.2.1. The WT system is ideally
installed in areas with high wind speeds as
shown in Section 4.2.2, while the PV/WT hybrid
system is ideally installed in locations with high
wind speeds and an abundant supply of
solar radiation.

Energies 2017,10, 587 20 of 27
Table 5. Cont.
Barrier Description Recommendations
Renewable
energy
resources
RESs heavily depend on natural resources that can be
unpredictable, intermittent, and dynamic. Therefore,
these systems must be integrated with other sources
of renewable/non-renewable energy and/or energy
storage solutions to ensure a continuous supply of
energy to BSs.
(1)
Use a battery bank that can feed BSs for
a sufficient number of days without relying
on auxiliary power sources.
(2)
Use a backup DG that feeds the BS during
malfunctions, when the BS demand exceeds
the RES power output, and when the
maximum DOD of the batteries is reached.
Environment
surrounding
The PV panels are installed in open areas and high
locations to maximize their access to sunlight.
However, the dirt, dust, tree debris, moss, sap, water
spots, and mold on solar panels significantly affect
the performance of PV systems. Cleaning these
panels also poses a problem. Lightning strikes may
damage their electronic components. The bypass
diodes, which are mounted on the termination box
under each panel, may either crack or short circuit
under high humidity and heat conditions.
(1)
The dual-axis tracking system for the PV
array allows wind, rain, and gravity to
remove most debris and dust. This system
can also increase the total amount of energy
produced by a PV system by approximately
20% to 30%.
(2)
Recruit trained and educated personnel to
operate, maintain, and manage RESs. These
systems must also be subjected to
continuous maintenance.
5. Conclusions
This paper investigates the sustainability of power resources and the ideal environmental
conditions for cellular communication systems. These two key issues may help cellular network
operators reduce not only their OPEX but also the negative effects of their operations on the
environment. Table 6compares the approaches presented in this article. This paper specifically
focuses on renewable-energy-powered BSs.
Table 6. Brief comparison of the approaches presented in this article.
Approach Energy
Savings/Enhancements Advantages Considerations
Improved PA
design
The energy savings depend
on a special design and may
reach up to 85%.
1. Huge savings,
which may reach
* up to 50% with a Doherty
architecture and GaN-based
PA; and
* up to 85% with SMPA
•High replacement cost
•Linearity and PAPR
Network operation
and management
The energy savings depend
on the number of and how
long the equipment or BSs
have been turned off. Up to
50% of energy may be saved.
•Easy implementation
•Inexpensive testing
and implementation
•Coverage
•Mobile battery life
•Inter-cell interference
•QoS
Network planning
and deployment
The energy savings may
reach up to 60%. •Low implementation cost
•Large potential savings
•Inter-cell interference
•Resource management
•QoS
•Compatibility
•Complexity
RESs
The energy savings depend
on the insolation/wind
speed rate and location of
the BSs.
•Long-term solution, especially
for off-grid BSs •
Natural energy resources
•Locations of BSs
•Costs
Exploiting the available energy from renewable resources presents these operators with an ideal
long-term solution to their problems. These resources are particularly useful for those countries
without mature or reliable electrical grids. A feasibility assessment must also be conducted
to identify those renewable-energy-powered systems that cannot provide sufficient amount of

Energies 2017,10, 587 21 of 27
power to BSs. Network operators must carefully consider both the operational and economical
aspects of these systems before making decisions regarding their implementation. The location
of renewable-energy-powered BSs must also be carefully considered because several locational
factors, such as dirt, dust, tree debris, moss, sap, water spots, and mold, can significantly affect
the performance of PV systems. Cleaning these panels also presents a challenge to these network
operators. Energy-efficient or “green” cellular networks are broad research topics facing several issues
that are yet to be addressed. Cellular network operators must shift toward green cellular networks to
reduce their expenditures and minimize the environmental effects of their operations.
Acknowledgments:
This work was supported by the Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute of
Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Trade,
industry & Energy (No. 20164030201340).
Author Contributions:
As the first author, Mohammed H. Alsharif wrote the main parts and the first draft of
this paper as well as reviewed the literature on sustainable power supply. Jin Hong Kim wrote Section 4.2 and
conducted a study on the appropriate geographic locations for the deployment of stations powered by solar or
wind power. Jeong Kim revised the final version of paper.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Feng, D.; Jiang, C.; Lim, G.; Cimini, L.J.; Feng, G.; Li, G.Y. A survey of energy-efficient wireless
communications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2013,15, 167–178. [CrossRef]
2.
Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zukerman, M.; Yung, E. Energy-Efficient Base Stations Sleep Mode Techniques in Green
Cellular Networks: A Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2015,17, 803–826. [CrossRef]
3.
Hasan, Z.; Boostanimehr, H.; Bhargava, V.K. Green Cellular Networks: A Survey, Some Research Issues and
Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2011,13, 524–540. [CrossRef]
4.
GSMA, “Community Power: Using Mobile to Extend the Grid,” London, UK, January 2010. Available online:
http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Community-Power-
Using-Mobile-to-Extend- the-Grid-January-2010.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2017).
5.
Oh, E.; Krishnamachari, B.; Liu, X.; Niu, Z. Toward dynamic energy-efficient operation of cellular network
infrastructure. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2011,49, 56–61. [CrossRef]
6.
Oh, E.; Son, K.; Krishnamachari, B. Dynamic base station switching-on/off strategies for green cellular
networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2013,12, 2126–2136. [CrossRef]
7.
Alsharif, M.H.; Nordin, R.; Ismail, M. Energy optimisation of hybrid off-grid system for remote
telecommunication base station deployment in Malaysia. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw.
2015
,2015, 1–15.
[CrossRef]
8.
Aris, A.M.; Shabani, B. Sustainable power supply solutions for off-grid base stations. Energies
2015
,8,
10904–10941. [CrossRef]
9.
Kusakana, K.; Vermaak, H.J. Hybrid renewable power systems for mobile telephony base stations in
developing countries. Renew. Energy 2013,51, 419–425. [CrossRef]
10.
Berkeley Energy & Resources Collaborative (BERC). Available online: http://berc.berkeley.edu/energy-
access-across-world/ (accessed on 8 January 2017).
11.
Suarez, L.; Nuaymi, L.; Bonnin, J.-M. An overview and classification of research approaches in green wireless
networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2012,2012, 1–18. [CrossRef]
12.
Alsharif, M.H.; Nordin, R.; Ismail, M. Classification, recent advances and research challenges in energy
efficient cellular networks. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2014,77, 1249–1269. [CrossRef]
13.
Li, G.Y.; Xu, Z.; Xiong, C.; Yang, C.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Y. Energy-efficient wireless communications: Tutorial,
survey, and open issues. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2011,18, 28–35. [CrossRef]
14.
Wang, X.; Vasilakos, A.V.; Chen, M.; Liu, Y.; Kwon, T.T. A survey of green mobile networks: Opportunities
and challenges. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2012,17, 4–20. [CrossRef]
15.
Chen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Xu, S.; Li, G.Y. Fundamental trade-offs on green wireless networks. IEEE Commun. Mag.
2011,49, 30–37. [CrossRef]

Energies 2017,10, 587 22 of 27
16.
Budzisz, Ł.; Ganji, F.; Rizzo, G.; Marsan, M.A.; Meo, M.; Zhang, Y.; Koutitas, G.; Tassiulas, L.; Lambert, S.;
Lannoo, B.; et al. Dynamic resource provisioning for energy efficiency in wireless access networks: A survey
and an outlook. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2014,16, 2259–2285. [CrossRef]
17.
GSMA, “Green Power for Mobile Interactive Replication Guide,” London, UK, June 2012.
Available online: http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Indian_
ReplicationGuide_300512_Final.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2017).
18.
Deruyck, M.; Tanghe, E.; Joseph, W.; Martens, L. Modelling and optimization of power consumption in
wireless access networks. Comput. Commun. 2011,34, 2036–2046. [CrossRef]
19.
Alsharif, M.H.; Nordin, R.; Ismail, M. Survey of Green Radio Communications Networks: Techniques and
Recent Advances. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. 2013,2013, 1–21. [CrossRef]
20.
Abdulkafi, A.A.; Kiong, T.S.; Sileh, I.K.; Chieng, D.; Ghaleb, A. A Survey of Energy Efficiency Optimization
in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 2016,10, 462–483.
21.
Deruyck, M.; Joseph, W.; Martens, L. Power consumption model for macrocell and microcell base stations.
Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2014,25, 320–333. [CrossRef]
22. Simi´c, I.S. Evolution of mobile base station architectures. Microw. Rev. 2007,13, 29–34.
23.
Auer, G.; Giannini, V.; Desset, C.; Godor, I.; Skillermark, P.; Olsson, M. How much energy is needed to run
a wireless network? IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2011,18, 40–49. [CrossRef]
24.
Imran, M.; Katranaras, E.; Auer, G.; Blume, O.; Giannini, V.; Godor, I.; Jading, Y.; Olsson, M.; Sabella, D.;
Skillermark, P. Energy Efficiency Analysis of the Reference Systems, Areas of Improvements and Target Breakdown;
ICT-EARTH Project, Deliverable D2. 3; EC-IST Office: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
25.
Mahloo, M.; Monti, P.; Chen, J.; Wosinska, L. Cost modeling of backhaul for mobile networks.
In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC), Sydney,
Australia, 10–14 June 2014; pp. 397–402.
26.
Samdanis, K.; Rost, P.; Maeder, A.; Meo, M.; Verikoukis, C. Green Communications: Principles, Concepts and
Practice, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Chapter 2; p. 24.
27.
Motorola Reach. Alternative Power for Mobile Telephony Base Stations. Solution Paper,
2007. Available online: http://content.motorolasolutions.com/web/Business/Solutions/Technologies/
WiMax/Access%20Services%20Network/_Documents/_Static%20Files/6682_MotDoc.pdf (accessed on
8 January 2017).
28.
Alsharif, M.H.; Nordin, R. Evolution towards fifth generation (5G) wireless networks: Current trends and
challenges in the deployment of millimetre wave, massive MIMO, and small cells. Telecommun. Syst.
2016
,
64, 617–637. [CrossRef]
29.
Infinite Focus Group. Alternative and Sustainable Power for Nigerian GSM/Mobile Base Stations.
Ireland. Available online: http://infinitefocus-group.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/WHITE_Paper_
Globacom.16865153.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2017).
30.
Rahman, M.M. Overview of Energy Saving Aspects in 2G and 3G Mobile Communication Networks.
Master’s Thesis in Electronics/Telecommunications 2009. Available online: http://www.diva-portal.org/
smash/get/diva2:278183/fulltext01.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2017).
31.
Ofcom, G.C.; Plextek, G.M.; Plextek, C.F.; Eftec, E.O.; Eftec, I.D.; Forster, C. Understanding the Environmental
Impact of Communication Systems. 2009. Available online: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/
pdf_file/0026/31886/environ.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2017).
32.
Davaslioglu, K.; Gitlin, R.D. 5G green networking: Enabling technologies, potentials, and challenges.
In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Annual Wireless and Microwave Technology
(WAMICON), Florida, FL, USA, 11–13 April 2016; pp. 1–6.
33.
Claussen, H.; Ho, L.T.; Pivit, F. Effects of joint macrocell and residential picocell deployment on the network
energy efficiency. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile
Radio Communications, Palais des Festivals Cannes, France, 15–18 September 2008; pp. 1–6.
34.
D DCKTN—Digital Communications Knowledge Transfer Network. Energy Efficient Wireless
Communications (Green Radio Access Networks). Technical Report. 2011. Available online:
https://connect.innovateuk.org/documents/2849135/3712563/DCKTN+energy+efficient+wireless+
communications+positioning+paper+30Mar11.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2017).
35. Berglund, B.; Johansson, J.; Lejon, T. High efficiency power amplifiers. Ericsson Rev. 2006,83, 92–96.

Energies 2017,10, 587 23 of 27
36.
Medina, M. RF Power Amplifiers for Wireless Communications. Ph.D. Thesis, Departement Elektrotechniek,
2008. Available online: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/242050/2/PhD_MYarleque.pdf
(accessed on 8 January 2017).
37.
Kim, W.-J.; Stapleton, S.P.; Kim, J.H.; Edelman, C. Digital predistortion linearizes wireless power amplifiers.
IEEE Microw. Mag. 2005,6, 54–61.
38.
Hammi, O. Efficient Linear Amplification for LTE Base Stations using Digitally Predistorted Overdriven
Power Amplifiers. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 2015,61, 398–406. [CrossRef]
39.
Chen, T.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Kim, H.; Horneman, K. Network energy saving technologies for green wireless
access networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2011,18, 30–38. [CrossRef]
40.
Kim, J.; Kim, B.; Woo, Y.Y. Advanced design of linear Doherty amplifier for high efficiency using saturation
amplifier. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Microwave Symposium, Honolulu, HI, USA,
3–8 June 2007; pp. 1573–1576.
41.
Joung, J.; Ho, C.K.; Sun, S. Green wireless communications: A power amplifier perspective. In Proceedings
of the Annual Summit and Conference in Signal & Information Processing Association (APSIPA ASC),
California, CA, USA, 3–6 December 2012; pp. 1–8.
42.
Trehan, A.K. Energy conservation solutions for mobile networks. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 34th
International Conference on Telecommunications Energy, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 30 September–4 October
2012; pp. 1–5.
43.
Alsharif, M.H.; Kim, J. Optimal Solar Power System for Remote Telecommunication Base Stations: A Case
Study Based on the Characteristics of South Korea’s Solar Radiation Exposure. Sustainability
2016
,8, 942.
[CrossRef]
44.
Chiaraviglio, L.; Ciullo, D.; Meo, M.; Marsan, M.A.; Torino, I. Energy-aware UMTS access networks.
In Proceedings of the IEEE W-GREEN, Lapland, Finland, 8 September 2008; pp. 1–8.
45.
Chiaraviglio, L.; Ciullo, D.; Meo, M.; Marsan, M.A. Energy-efficient management of UMTS access
networks. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference in Teletraffic Congress, Paris, France,
15–17 September 2009; pp. 1–8.
46.
Marsan, M.A.; Chiaraviglio, L.; Ciullo, D.; Meo, M. Optimal energy savings in cellular access networks.
In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) Workshops, Dresden,
Germany, 14–18 June 2009; pp. 1–5.
47.
Xiang, L.; Pantisano, F.; Verdone, R.; Ge, X.; Chen, M. Adaptive traffic load-balancing for green cellular
networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Conference on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio
Communications (PIMRC), Toronto, ON, Canada, 11–14 September 2011; pp. 41–45.
48.
Lorincz, J.; Capone, A.; Begusic, D. Impact of service rates and base station switching granularity on energy
consumption of cellular networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2012,2012, 1–24. [CrossRef]
49.
Bousia, A.; Antonopoulos, A.; Alonso, L.; Verikoukis, C. “Green” distance-aware base station sleeping
algorithm in LTE-Advanced. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC),
Ottawa, ON, Canada, 10–15 June 2012; pp. 1347–1351.
50.
Niu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Gong, J.; Yang, Z. Cell zooming for cost-efficient green cellular networks.
IEEE Commun. Mag.
2010,48, 74–79. [CrossRef]
51. Marsan, M.A.; Chiaraviglio, L.; Ciullo, D.; Meo, M. On the effectiveness of single and multiple base station
sleep modes in cellular networks. Comput. Netw. 2013,57, 3276–3290. [CrossRef]
52.
Alsharif, M.H.; Nordin, R.; Ismail, M. Intelligent cooperation management of multi-radio access technology
towards the green cellular networks for the twenty-twenty information society. Telecommun. Syst.
2016
, 1–14.
[CrossRef]
53.
Marsan, M.A.; Meo, M. Energy efficient management of two cellular access networks. ACM SIGMETRICS
Perform. Eval. Rev. 2010,37, 69–73. [CrossRef]
54.
Marsan, M.A.; Meo, M. Energy efficient wireless Internet access with cooperative cellular networks.
Comput. Netw. 2011,55, 386–398. [CrossRef]
55.
Hoydis, J.; Debbah, M. Green, cost-effective, flexible, small cell networks. IEEE Commun. Soc. MMTC
2010
,5,
23–26.
56.
Song, J.-Y.; Lee, H.; Cho, D.-H. Power consumption reduction by multi-hop transmission in cellular
networks. In Proceedings of the 60th IEEE Conference on Vehicular Technology, Los Angeles, CA, USA,
26–29 September 2004; pp. 3120–3124.

Energies 2017,10, 587 24 of 27
57.
Rost, P.; Fettweis, G. Green communications in cellular networks with fixed relay nodes. In Cooperative
Cellular Wireless Networks Book; Cambragr University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011; Chapter 11; p. 300.
58.
Sendonaris, A.; Erkip, E.; Aazhang, B. User cooperation diversity. Part I. System description. IEEE Trans.
Commun. 2003,51, 1927–1938. [CrossRef]
59.
Nokleby, M.; Aazhang, B. User cooperation for energy-efficient cellular communications. In Proceedings of
the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Cape Town, South Africa, 23–27 May 2010;
pp. 1–5.
60.
Abdulkafi, A.A.; Kiong, T.S.; Chieng, D.; Ting, A.; Koh, J. Energy efficiency improvements in heterogeneous
network through traffic load balancing and sleep mode mechanisms. Wirel. Pers. Commun.
2014
,75,
2151–2164. [CrossRef]
61.
Navaratnarajah, S.; Saeed, A.; Dianati, M.; Imran, M.A. Energy efficiency in heterogeneous wireless access
networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2013,20, 37–43. [CrossRef]
62.
Zhang, X.; Su, Z.; Yan, Z.; Wang, W. Energy-efficiency study for two-tier heterogeneous networks (HetNet)
under coverage performance constraints. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2013,18, 567–577. [CrossRef]
63.
Richter, F.; Fettweis, G. Cellular mobile network densification utilizing micro base stations. In Proceedings
of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Cape Town, South Africa, 23–27 May 2010;
pp. 1–6.
64.
Lorincz, J.; Matijevic, T. Energy-efficiency analyses of heterogeneous macro and micro base station sites.
Comput. Electr. Eng. 2014,40, 330–349. [CrossRef]
65.
Jafari, A.H.; López-Pérez, D.; Song, H.; Claussen, H.; Ho, L.; Zhang, J. Small cell backhaul: Challenges and
prospective solutions. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2015,2015, 1–18. [CrossRef]
66.
Han, F.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, L.; Wu, J. Survey of strategies for switching off base stations in heterogeneous
networks for greener 5G systems. IEEE Access 2016,4, 4959–4973. [CrossRef]
67.
Sulyman, A.I.; Nassar, A.; Samimi, M.K.; Maccartney, G.; Rappaport, T.S.; Alsanie, A. Radio propagation path
loss models for 5G cellular networks in the 28 GHZ and 38 GHZ millimeter-wave bands.
IEEE Commun. Mag.
2014,52, 78–86. [CrossRef]
68.
Ge, X.; Cao, C.; Jo, M.; Chen, M.; Hu, J.; Humar, I. Energy Efficiency Modelling and Analyzing Based on
Multi-cell and Multi-antenna Cellular Networks. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 2010,4, 560–574. [CrossRef]
69.
Fehske, A.J.; Richter, F.; Fettweis, G.P. Energy efficiency improvements through micro sites in cellular
mobile radio networks. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Globecom Workshops, Hawaii, HI, USA,
30 November–4 December 2009; pp. 1–5.
70.
Richter, F.; Fehske, A.J.; Fettweis, G.P. Energy efficiency aspects of base station deployment strategies for
cellular networks. In Proceedings of the 70th IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Technology
(VTC 2009-Fall), Alaska, AK, USA, 20–23 September 2009; pp. 1–5.
71.
Khirallah, C.; Thompson, J.S. Energy efficiency of heterogeneous networks in lte-advanced. J. Signal
Process. Syst. 2012,69, 105–113. [CrossRef]
72.
Richter, F.; Fehske, A.J.; Marsch, P.; Fettweis, G.P. Traffic demand and energy efficiency in heterogeneous
cellular mobile radio networks. In Proceedings of the 71st IEEE International Conference on Vehicular
Technology (VTC 2010-Spring), Taipei, Taiwan, 16–19 May 2010; pp. 1–6.
73.
Badic, B.; O’Farrrell, T.; Loskot, P.; He, J. Energy efficient radio access architectures for green radio:
Large versus small cell size deployment. In Proceedings of the 70th IEEE International Conference on
Vehicular Technology (VTC 2009-Fall), Alaska, AK, USA, 20–23 September 2009; pp. 1–5.
74.
Chen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Xu, S. Characterizing energy efficiency and deployment efficiency relations for
green architecture design. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications
Workshops, Cape Town, South Africa, 23–27 May 2010; pp. 1–5.
75.
Han, T.; Ansari, N. Optimizing cell size for energy saving in cellular networks with hybrid energy
supplies. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Global Communications Conference
(GLOBECOM), California, CA, USA, 3–7 December 2012; pp. 5189–5193.
76.
González-Brevis, P.; Gondzio, J.; Fan, Y.; Poor, H.V.; Thompson, J.; Krikidis, I. Base station location
optimization for minimal energy consumption in wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 73rd IEEE
International Conference on Vehicular Technology (VTC 2011-Spring), Budapest, Hungary, 15–18 May 2011;
pp. 1–5.

Energies 2017,10, 587 25 of 27
77.
Guo, W.; Wang, S.; Chu, X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Song, H. Automated small-cell deployment for heterogeneous
cellular networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2013,51, 46–53. [CrossRef]
78.
Arnold, O.; Richter, F.; Fettweis, G.; Blume, O. Power consumption modeling of different base station types
in heterogeneous cellular networks. In Proceedings of the 2010 Future Network & Mobile Summit, Florence,
Italy, 16–18 June 2010; pp. 1–8.
79.
Guo, W.; O’Farrell, T. Green cellular network: Deployment solutions, sensitivity and tradeoffs. In Proceedings
of the International Conference on Wireless Advanced (WiAd), London, UK, 20–22 June 2011; pp. 42–47.
80.
Di Piazza, F.I.; Mangione, S.; Tinnirello, I. Maximizing network capacity in an heterogeneous macro-micro
cellular scenario. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC),
Kerkyra, Greece, 28 June–1 July 2011; pp. 365–370.
81.
Niu, Z.; Zhou, S.; Hua, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, D. Energy-aware network planning for wireless cellular system
with inter-cell cooperation. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2012,11, 1412–1423. [CrossRef]
82.
He, C.; Sheng, B.; Zhu, P.; You, X. Energy efficiency and spectral efficiency tradeoff in downlink distributed
antenna systems. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2012,1, 153–156. [CrossRef]
83.
He, C.; Sheng, B.; Zhu, P.; You, X.; Li, G.Y. Energy-and spectral-efficiency tradeoff for distributed antenna
systems with proportional fairness. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2013,31, 894–902. [CrossRef]
84.
Behjati, M.; Alsharif, M.H.; Nordin, R.; Ismail, M. Energy Efficient and High Capacity Tradeoff in Distributed
Antenna System for a Green Cellular Network. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. 2015,2015, 1–23. [CrossRef]
85.
John, P. Let It Shine: The 6000 Year Story of Solar Energy; Revised Edition; New World Library: Novato, CA,
USA, 2013; Chapter 23.
86.
Ellabban, O.; Abu-Rub, H.; Blaabjerg, F. Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and
their enabling technology. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014,39, 748–764. [CrossRef]
87.
GSMA. Greening Telecoms: Pakistan and Afghanistan Market Analysis. 2013. Available online:
http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/GPM_Pakistan_
Afghanistan_Market-Analysis_Oct-2013.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2017).
88.
Schmitt, G. The Green Base Station. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Telecommunication
Energy Special Conference (TELESCON), Vienna, Austria, 10–13 May 2009; pp. 1–6.
89.
Paudel, S.; Shrestha, J.N.; Neto, F.J.; Ferreira, J.A.; Adhikari, M. Optimization of hybrid PV/Wind power
system for remote telecom station. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Power and Energy
Systems (ICPS), Chennai, India, 22–24 December 2011; pp. 1–6.
90.
Marsan, M.A.; Bucalo, G.; di Caro, A.; Meo, M.; Zhang, Y. Towards zero grid electricity networking:
Powering BSs with renewable energy sources. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference
oncommunications (ICC), Budapest, Hungary, 9–13 June 2013; pp. 596–601.
91.
Dufo-López, R.; Bernal-Agustín, J.L. Grid-connected renewable electricity storage: Batteries vs. hydrogen.
Adv. Mech. Electron. Eng. 2013,178, 221–225.
92.
Borhanazad, H.; Mekhilef, S.; Saidur, R.; Boroumandjazi, G. Potential application of renewable energy for
rural electrification in Malaysia. Renew. Energy 2013,59, 210–219. [CrossRef]
93.
Nguyen, H.Q.; Aris, A.M.; Shabani, B. PEM fuel cell heat recovery for preheating inlet air in standalone
solar-hydrogen systems for telecommunication applications: An exergy analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
2016,41, 2987–3003. [CrossRef]
94.
Cordiner, S.; Mulone, V.; Giordani, A.; Savino, M.; Tomarchio, G.; Malkow, T. Fuel cell based Hybrid
Renewable Energy Systems for off-grid telecom stations: Data analysis from on field demonstration tests.
Appl. Energy 2016,192, 508–518. [CrossRef]
95.
Solargis Apps. World Solar Resource Maps. Available online: http://solargis.com/products/maps-and-gis-
data/free/download/world (accessed on 8 January 2017).
96.
Vaisala—A Global Leader in Environmental and Industrial Measurement. Global Wind Speed Map.
Available online: http://www.vaisala.com/en/energy/support/Resources/Pages/Free-Wind-And-Solar-
Resource-Maps.aspx (accessed on 8 January 2017).
97.
Netmanias Report, LTE in Korea. Available online: http://www.netmanias.com/en/post/reports/6060/
c-ran-fronthaul-kt-korea-lg-u-lte- lte-a-sk-telecom-samsung- wideband-lte/lte-in-korea-2013 (accessed on
8 January 2017).
98.
Alsharif, M.H.; Kim, J. Hybrid Off-Grid SPV/WTG Power System for Remote Cellular Base Stations towards
Green and Sustainable Cellular Networks in South Korea. Energies 2016,10, 9. [CrossRef]

Energies 2017,10, 587 26 of 27
99.
The Korea Times. LG Uplus Develops Solar-Powered LTE Base Stations. Available online: http://www.
koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2016/06/133_207882.html (accessed on 8 January 2017).
100.
Alsharif, M.H.; Nordin, R.; Ismail, M. Green wireless network optimisation strategies within smart grid
environments for Long Term Evolution (LTE) cellular networks in Malaysia. Renew. Energy
2016
,85, 157–170.
[CrossRef]
101.
Abdullah, M.; Yung, V.; Anyi, M.; Othman, A.; Hamid, K.A.; Tarawe, J. Review and comparison study of
hybrid diesel/solar/hydro/fuel cell energy schemes for a rural ICT Telecenter. Energy
2010
,35, 639–646.
[CrossRef]
102.
DiGi, Malaysia—Telenor Group. Hydrogen-Powered Base Stations. Available online: https://www.telenor.
com/media/articles/2016/digi-is-first-in- malaysia-to-test-hydrogen-powered-base-stations/ (accessed on
8 January 2017).
103.
Serincan, M.F. Reliability considerations of a fuel cell backup power system for telecom applications.
J. Power Source 2016,309, 66–75. [CrossRef]
104.
Vodafone Turkey Sustainability Report 2014–2015. Available online: http://www.vodafone.com.TR/
VodafoneHakkinda/2014--15-Report- Eng.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2017).
105.
¸Senkal, O.; Kuleli, T. Estimation of solar radiation over Turkey using artificial neural network and satellite
data. Appl. Energy 2009,86, 1222–1228. [CrossRef]
106.
To ˘grul, I.T.; To˘grul, H. Global solar radiation over Turkey: Comparison of predicted and measured data.
Renew. Energy 2002,25, 55–67. [CrossRef]
107.
Chamola, V.; Sikdar, B. Solar powered cellular base stations: Current scenario, issues and proposed solutions.
IEEE Commun. Mag. 2016,54, 108–114. [CrossRef]
108.
Jhunjhunwala, A.; Ramamurthi, B.; Narayanamurthy, S.; Rangarajan, J.; Raj, S. Powering Cellular Base Stations:
A Quantitative Analysis of Energy Options; Technical Report; Indian Institute of Technology: Tamil Nadu,
India, 2012.
109.
Amutha, W.M.; Rajini, V. Techno-economic evaluation of various hybrid power systems for rural telecom.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015,43, 553–561. [CrossRef]
110.
Nema, P.; Nema, R.; Rangnekar, S. Minimization of green house gases emission by using hybrid energy
system for telephony base station site application. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
2010
,14, 1635–1639. [CrossRef]
111.
Rath, S.; Ali, S.; Iqbal, M.N. Strategic Approach of Hybrid Solar-Wind Power for Remote Telecommunication
Sites in INDIA. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2012,3, 1094–1099.
112.
Sharma, A.; Singh, A.; Khemariya, M. Homer optimization based solar PV; wind energy and diesel generator
based hybrid system. Int. J. Soft Comput. Eng. 2013,3, 2231–2307.
113.
Bajpai, P.; Prakshan, N.; Kishore, N. Renewable hybrid stand-alone telecom power system modeling and
analysis. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Region 10 Conference on TENCON, Singapore, Singapore,
23–26 November 2009; pp. 1–6.
114.
GSMA. Extending the Grid: Bangladesh Market Analysis. 2013. Available online: http://www.gsma.
com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/GPM-Market-Analysis-Bangladesh.pdf
(accessed on 8 January 2017).
115.
Chowdhury, S.A.; Roy, V.; Aziz, S. Renewable energy usage in the telecommunication sector of Bangladesh:
Prospect and progress. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference Developments in Renewable
Energy Technology (ICDRET), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 17–19 December 2009; pp. 1–5.
116.
Moury, S.; Khandoker, N.M.; Haider, M.S. Feasibility Study of Solar PV Arrays in Grid Connected Cellular
BTS Sites. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Power Conversion and
Energy Technologies (APCET), Mylavaram, India, 2–4 August 2012; pp. 1–5.
117. Ministry of Water and Power. Available online: www.mowp.gov.pk (accessed on 8 January 2017).
118.
Imtiaz, A.W.; Hafeez, K. Stand Alone PV System for Remote Cell Site in Swat Valley. In Proceedings of the
1st International Conference on Technology and Business Management, Peshawar, Pakistan, 2–4 April 2013;
pp. 1–5.
119.
Asif, R.; Khanzada, F. Cellular Base Station Powered by Hybrid Energy Options. Int. J. Comput. Appl.
2015
,
115, 35–39. [CrossRef]
120.
Olatomiwa, L.; Mekhilef, S.; Huda, A.; Sanusi, K. Techno-economic analysis of hybrid PV–diesel–battery
and PV–wind–diesel–battery power systems for mobile BTS: The way forward for rural development.
Energy Sci. Eng. 2015,3, 271–285. [CrossRef]

Energies 2017,10, 587 27 of 27
121.
Bala, E.; Ojosu, J.; Umar, I. Government policies and programmes on the development of solar-PV Sub-sector
in Nigeria. Niger. J. Renew. Energy 2000,8, 1–6.
122.
Uzoma, C.; Nnaji, C.; Ibeto, C.; Okpara, C.; Nwoke, O.; Obi, I. Renewable energy penetration in Nigeria:
A study of the South-East zone. J. Environ. Sci. 2011,5, 1–5.
123.
Faruk, N.; Ayeni, A.; Muhammad, M.; Olawoyin, L.; Abubakar, A.; Agbakoba, J. Powering cell sites for
mobile cellular systems using solar power. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2012,2, 732–741.
124.
Anayochukwu, A.V.; Nnene, E.A. Simulation and optimization of hybrid diesel power generation system for
GSM base station site in Nigeria. Electron. J. Energy Environ. 2013,1, 37–56. [CrossRef]
125.
Ani, V.A. Optimal Sizing and Application of Renewable Energy Sources at GSM Base Station Site. Int. J.
Renew. Energy Res. 2013,3, 579–585.
126.
Ani, V.A.; Nzeako, A.N. Potentials of Optimized Hybrid System in Powering Off-Grid Macro Base
Transmitter Station Site. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 2013,3, 861–871.
127.
Ani, V.A. Optimal operational strategy for PV/wind-diesel hybrid power generation system with energy
storage. Int. J. Energy Optim. Eng. 2014,3, 101–120. [CrossRef]
128.
Conteh, A. Overcoming the vast challenge of deploying a mobile network in the democratic republic of
congo (DRC). In Proceedings of VODACOM Singapore Annual Meeting, Singapore, 17 September 2006.
129.
Paudel, S.; Dahal, M.S.; Adhikari, M.; Shrestha, J.N. Technical and Economic Assessment of Renewable
Energy Sources for Telecom Application: A Case Study of Nepal Telecom. In Proceedings of the 5th
International Conference on Power and Energy Systems, Kathmandu, Nepal, 28–30 October 2013; pp. 1–6.
130.
Martínez-Díaz, M.; Villafáfila-Robles, R.; Montesinos-Miracle, D.; Sudrià-Andreu, A. Study of optimization
design criteria for stand-alone hybrid renewable power systems. In Proceedings of the International
Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ’13), Bilbao, Spain, 20–22 March 2013;
pp. 1–5.
131.
Salih, T.; Wang, Y.; Adam, M.A.A. Renewable micro hybrid system of solar panel and wind turbine for
telecommunication equipment in remote areas in Sudan. Energy Procedia 2014,61, 80–83. [CrossRef]
132.
Hossam, K.; Mikhail, A.R.; Hafez, I.M.; Anis, W.R. Optimum Design of PV Systems for BTS in Remote and
Urban Areas. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2016,5, 1–9.
133.
Belkhiri, S.; Chaker, A. Optimization of Hybrid PV/Wind System for Remote Telecom Station, a Case Study
of Different Sites in Algeria. Int. Proc. Chem. Biol. Environ. Eng. 2016,91, 17–23.
134.
Kaldellis, J. Optimum hybrid photovoltaic-based solution for remote telecommunication stations.
Renew. Energy 2010,35, 2307–2315. [CrossRef]
135.
Leonardi, G.; Meo, M.; Marsan, M.A. Markovian models of solar power supply for a LTE macro BS.
In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,
23–27 May 2016; pp. 1–7.
136.
Zhang, Y.; Meo, M.; Gerboni, R.; Marsan, M.A. Minimum cost solar power systems for LTE macro base
stations. Comput. Netw. 2017,112, 12–23. [CrossRef]
137.
Meo, M.; Zhang, Y.; Gerboni, R.; Marsan, M.A. Dimensioning the power supply of a LTE macro BS connected
to a PV panel and the power grid. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications
(ICC), London, UK, 8–12 June 2015; pp. 178–184.
138.
Chamola, V.; Sikdar, B. Power Outage Estimation and Resource Dimensioning for Solar Powered Cellular
Base Stations. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2016,64, 5278–5289. [CrossRef]
139.
Chamola, V.; Krishnamachari, B.; Sikdar, B. Green Energy and Delay Aware Downlink Power Control and
User Association for off-Grid Solar Powered Base Stations. IEEE Syst. J. 2017,2016, 1–12. [CrossRef]
140.
Bruni, G.; Cordiner, S.; Mulone, V.; Giordani, A.; Savino, M.; Tomarchio, G.; Malkow, T.; Tsotridis, G.;
Bodker, G.; Jensen, J.; et al. Fuel cell based power systems to supply power to telecom stations. Int. J.
Hydrogen Energy 2014,39, 21767–21777. [CrossRef]
141.
Scamman, D.; Newborough, M.; Bustamante, H. Hybrid hydrogen-battery systems for renewable off-grid
telecom power. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015,40, 13876–13887. [CrossRef]
©
2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).