- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Social Psychology of Education
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Do procrastination-friendly environments make
students delay unnecessarily?
Kent Nordby
1
•Katrin B. Klingsieck
2
•
Frode Svartdal
1
Received: 7 March 2017 / Accepted: 5 June 2017 / Published online: 14 July 2017
Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017
Abstract Research on procrastination emphasizes trait explanations for unwanted
delay, yet environmental factors are most probably significant contributors to the
problem. In this paper, we review literature related to the influence of environmental
factors on academic procrastination and investigate how such factors may be
assessed in facilitating academic procrastination in students. Study 1 asked students
to evaluate three different fields of study—natural sciences, medicine, and
humanities—on environmental variables assumed to be relevant for academic
procrastination (e.g., structured course progression, freedom in the study situation).
Distinct differences between the academic fields were observed. In Study 2, par-
ticipants from these three fields of study rated their own academic procrastination as
well as peer procrastination and peer influence. Dispositional (trait) procrastination
was also measured. The results demonstrated that environmental factors have a
negligible impact on low-procrastinating students, whereas procrastination-friendly
environments seem to facilitate and augment academic procrastination in students at
medium-level dispositional procrastination, i.e., the majority of students. We con-
clude that social and environmental factors should receive increased attention in
measures taken to reduce and prevent academic procrastination.
Keywords Academic procrastination Peer effects Procrastination
environment Procrastination antecedents Self-control
&Frode Svartdal
frode.svartdal@uit.no
1
Department of Psychology, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
2
Department of Psychology, Universita
¨t Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
123
Soc Psychol Educ (2017) 20:491–512
DOI 10.1007/s11218-017-9386-x
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.