Content uploaded by Karen Ghazaryan
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Karen Ghazaryan on Oct 11, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
29
National Academy of Sciences of RA
Electronic Journal of
NATURAL SCIENCES
ՀՀ Գիտությունների ազգային ակադեմիա
Էլեկտրոնային ամսագիր
ԲՆԱԿԱՆ ԳԻՏՈՒԹՅՈՒՆՆԵՐ
Национальная Академия наук РА
Электронный журнал
ЕСТЕСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ
2(29), 2017
Ecology
Էկոլոգիա
Экология
HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY META L POLLUTION IN SOILS
AROUND KAPAN MINING AREA, ARMENIA
G. A. Gevorgyan1, K. A. Ghazaryan2, H. S. Movsesyan2, H. G. Zhamharyan2
1Institute of Hydroecology and Ichthyology of Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology of NAS RA, Yerevan, Armenia
2Chair of Ecology and Nature Protection of Faculty of Biology of YSU, Yerevan, Armenia; e-mail: gev_gor@mail.ru
ABSTRACT
Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks of heavy metal pollution in the soils around the Kapan mining area, Armenia were
investigated. The results of the study showed that the content of heavy metals (Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Mo, Cd, Pb) in the soils
sampled in June, 2013 may have posed non-carcinogenic and even carcinogenic risks to population, mainly children living in this
territory. Cr was the main element causing human health risks in the area.
Key words: mining industry, heavy metals, soil, human health risks
INTRODUCTION
Due to the continuous industrialization in many parts of the world, pollutants are emitted into the terrestrial
environment and pose a great threat to human health [16]. Heavy metals are a common occurrence in the environment
and have resulted in human exposure for the entire history of mankind [11]. Soil is a dynamic, natural body occurring
on the surface of the earth [2]. Soil contamination with heavy metals has severely increased over the last few decades,
mainly from industrial wastes and human activities. Soil pollution with heavy metals is a result of both natural
processes such as weathering of minerals, and anthropogenic activities, related to industries, fossil fuel burning,
emissions from vehicles, mining, agriculture and metallurgical processes and their waste disposal [13]. The degree of
soil metal contamination can pose hidden danger to human health via many different ways (e.g. oral ingestion, dermal
contact and inhalation pathways) [12]. Once absorbed by the body, heavy metals continue to accumulate in vital organs
like brain, liver, bones and kidneys, for years or decades causing serious health consequences [11].
Mining and metallurgical industries are highly developed in the Republic of Armenia and have been the driving force
behind economic development in some territories of the country, particularly in Syunik and Lori Marzes (administrative
districts) since the last decades of the twentieth century [3, 6, 8, 9]. The insufficient management of mining discharges
in these areas has become a serious threat to the environment [1, 3–9]. Kapan region in Syunik Marz is considered as
one of metallurgical industrial centers in Armenia. Mining activities in this territory are mainly expressed by heavy
metal pollution of the environment [4, 6–9].
Therefore, the investigation of the heavy metal pollution in the soils and related human health risks in this territory is
required. The aim of the present study was to assess human health risks of the heavy metal pollution in the soils around
Kapan mining area, Armenia.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The soils around the Kapan mining area located in the southeastern part of Armenia were investigated in June, 2013.
The soils in these areas belong to the type of mountain cambisol. 12 observation sites were selected around the Kapan
copper-molybdenum combine (Nos. 1–6) and the Geghanush tailing dump (Nos. 7–12). A control site was selected
4 km away from the Kapan copper-molybdenum combine.
The soil samples were obtained from a depth of 0–20 cm and transferred into the well labeled polyethylene bags for
storage and laboratory analysis. The collected samples were air-dried at room temperature. The dried samples were
grounded into powder by a laboratory mortar and pestle, sieved with 1 mm mesh sieve and stored in an air tight
container prior to analysis. The soil samples were digested by the Aqua Regia (HCl–HNO3, 3:1) digestion method [20].
The digested soil samples were analyzed for heavy metals (Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Mo, Cd, Pb) by using ELAN9000
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS).
Health risks associated with heavy metals in soil were examined based on the risk assessment methodology adopted
from the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (equations (1)–(13)) [15, 18]. The
30
non-carcinogenic chronic daily exposure doses (DEDnc) through oral ingestion (mg/kg/d), dermal absorption (mg/kg/d)
and inhalation (mg/m3) were calculated using equations (1)–(3):
where C is measured heavy metal concentration (mg/kg), IngR is the soil ingestion rate for receptor (mg/d), CF is the
unit conversion factor (kg/mg), ED is the exposure duration (year), EF is the exposure frequency (d/year), ABS is the
dermal absorption factor (unit less), AF is the soil to skin adherence factor (mg/cm2), SA is the skin surface area
available for exposure (cm2), ET is the exposure time (h/d), BW is the average body weight (kg), ATnc is the averaging
time for non-carcinogens (d), PEF is the soil-to-air particulate emission factor (m3/kg) [15, 18].
The non-carcinogenic hazard quotient (HQnc) value (unit less) of individual heavy metals was calculated by equation
(4):
...where RfD is the reference dose (mg/kg/d) through oral ingestion and dermal absorption, RfC is the reference
concentration (mg/m3) through inhalation [10, 15, 18].
The individual metal non-carcinogenic hazard index (HInc) value was calculated by equation (5):
Non-carcinogenic health risks posed by all metals, expressed as the total hazard index (THInc), were assessed by the
following equation:
The carcinogenic daily exposure doses (DEDca) for Cr, Ni, As, Pb, Cd were used to assess carcinogenic health risks.
DEDca through oral ingestion (mg/kg/d), dermal absorption (mg/kg/d) and inhalation (mcg/m3) were calculated using
equations (7)–(11):
where IR is soil ingestion rate-age adjusted (mg x year/kg/d), DFS is soil dermal contact factor-age adjusted (mg x
year/kg/d), ATca is averaging time for carcinogens (d) [17, 18].
The individual metal non-carcinogenic hazard index (HIca) value was calculated by the equation (12):
where CSF is the oral and dermal cancer slope factor (mg/kg/d)-1, IUR is the inhalation unit risk (mcg/m3)-1 [10, 12, 18].
The total carcinogenic hazard index (THIca) value was calculated by the following equation:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results of the investigation of heavy metal contents in the soils around the Kapan mining area are given in Table 1.
The study results showed that heavy metal concentrations in the soils were conditioned by both lithogenic and
anthropogenic sources as the concentrations of different heavy metals in all the investigated observation sites excedeed
the background (control) level. The highest level of anthropogenic metal was especially registered in case of Cu and Mo
which is explained by the high concentrations of these metals in the ore of the Kapan copper-molybdenum combine
(Table 1).
31
Table 1. Some heavy metal contents (mg/kg) in the soils around the Kapan copper-molybdenum combine and
the Geghanush tailing dump.
Parameters
Cr
Mn
Ni
Cu
Zn
As
Mo
Cd
Pb
Soils around Kapan copper-molybdenum combine
Minimum
17.54
813.23
26.40
32.57
65.98
6.86
0.25
0.23
4.02
Maximum
99.45
1557.61
118.52
72.76
127.13
22.49
1.14
0.52
22.43
Mean
52.48
1122.41
67.35
51.21
96.82
12.60
0.65
0.33
12.48
Standard deviation
31.14
263.08
34.26
15.47
24.76
5.81
0.33
0.12
6.43
Soils around Geghanush tailing dump
Minimum
18.57
854.38
20.52
37.84
56.15
2.74
0.12
0.12
2.64
Maximum
47.43
161.15
56.05
100.42
97.67
7.77
0.53
0.23
7.13
Mean
35.95
1365.37
39.01
66.67
78.43
5.21
0.33
0.18
4.77
Standard deviation
11.93
293.11
14.50
22.79
15.64
2.09
0.14
0.042
2.02
Control
23.20
527.70
26.40
8.97
75.50
7.48
0.18
0.24
10.26
The heavy metal pollution in soil can increase human health risks through different exposure pathways. In this study,
non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks posed by oral ingestion, dermal contact and the inhalation of particulates
were investigated. The results of the study showed that the THInc values in all the observation sites were above the safe
level (THInc<1) for children living in the investigated territory (Fig. 1). Children are particularly more sensitive to the
exposure to toxic metals in soil than adults because they may absorb much more heavy metals from soil during their
outdoor play activities [6]. The cancer risk levels posed by Cr, Ni, As, Pb, Cd were mostly in the acceptable range (10-
6–10-4), however, in some cases, the THIca value was very close to and even above the safe level (Fig. 2) [19]. Such
heavy metal pollution degree in the soils around the Kapan copper-molybdenum combine and the Geghanush tailing
dump may pose non-carcinogenic and even carcinogenic health hazards affecting the activities of different tissues,
organs and organ systems such as respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts, central nervous and cardiovascular systems,
blood, skin, etc. [10, 14].
Fig. 1. Values of the total non-carcinogenic chronic hazard index (THInc) of heavy metals in the soils around the Kapan copper-
molybdenum combine and the Geghanush tailing dump.
Fig. 2. Values of the total carcinogenic hazard index (THIca) of heavy metals in the soils around the Kapan copper-molybdenum
combine and the Geghanush tailing dump.
According to the individual metal non-carcinogenic hazard index (HInc) values, health hazard of individual heavy
metals was in the order of Cr>As>Mn>Ni>Pb>Cu>Cd>Zn>Mo (soils around the Kapan copper-molybdenum combine)
32
and Cr>Mn>As>Ni>Cu>Pb>Cd>Zn>Mo (soils around the Geghanush tailing dump) (Tables 2 and 3). The investigated
heavy metals can be ranked by individual metal carcinogenic risk levels as follows: Cr>As>Pb>Ni>Cd (Table 4). Cu
and Mo were the main anthropogenic heavy metals in the investigated soils, nevertheless the highest human health risks
were posed by Cr which is explained by the fact that different heavy metals don’t have the same toxicity levels and
penetration characteristics and may cause health effects at different pollution degrees. Such pollution degree of Cr in
soil may cause non-carcinogenic hazards to children (Tables 1–4) [5, 6].
Table 2. Individual metal non-carcinogenic hazard index (HInc) values in the soils around the Kapan copper-molybdenum combine.
Parameters
Cr
Mn
Ni
Cu
Zn
As
Mo
Cd
Pb
Individual metal HInc value for child
Minimum
0.5579
0.2422
0.0525
0.0113
0.0030
0.3185
0.0007
0.0128
0.0159
Maximum
3.1632
0.4610
0.2358
0.0252
0.0059
1.0446
0.0032
0.0290
0.0888
Mean
1.6690
0.3334
0.1340
0.0177
0.0045
0.5850
0.0018
0.0184
0.0494
Standard deviation
0.9904
0.0774
0.0681
0.0054
0.0011
0.2700
0.0009
0.0069
0.0255
Individual metal HInc value for adult
Minimum
0.0107
0.0206
0.0021
0.0011
0.0003
0.0318
0.0001
0.0004
0.0016
Maximum
0.0602
0.0365
0.0096
0.0025
0.0006
0.1050
0.0003
0.0009
0.0089
Mean
0.0313
0.0277
0.0055
0.0018
0.0004
0.0583
0.0002
0.0005
0.0049
Standard deviation
0.0189
0.0057
0.0028
0.0005
0.0001
0.0276
0.0001
0.0002
0.0025
Table 3. Individual metal non-carcinogenic hazard index (HInc) values in the soils around the Geghanush tailing dump.
Parameters
Cr
Mn
Ni
Cu
Zn
As
Mo
Cd
Pb
Individual metal HInc value for child
Minimum
0.5906
0.2539
0.0408
0.0131
0.0026
0.1272
0.0003
0.0067
0.0105
Maximum
1.5086
0.4762
0.1115
0.0348
0.0045
0.3608
0.0015
0.0128
0.0282
Mean
1.1434
0.4049
0.0776
0.0231
0.0036
0.2419
0.0009
0.0098
0.0189
Standard deviation
0.3794
0.0860
0.0289
0.0079
0.0007
0.0970
0.0004
0.0024
0.0080
Individual metal HInc value for adult
Minimum
0.0110
0.0214
0.0016
0.0013
0.0003
0.0128
0.0000
0.0002
0.0010
Maximum
0.0297
0.0373
0.0047
0.0035
0.0004
0.0371
0.0001
0.0004
0.0028
Mean
0.0222
0.0328
0.0032
0.0023
0.0004
0.0243
0.0001
0.0003
0.0019
Standard deviation
0.0074
0.0065
0.0013
0.0008
0.0001
0.0099
0.0000
0.0001
0.0008
Table 4. Individual metal carcinogenic hazard index (HIca) values in the soils around the Kapan copper-
molybdenum combine and the Geghanush tailing dump.
Parameters
Cr
As
Pb
Cd
Ni
Soils around Kapan copper-molybdenum combine
Minimum
1.5E-05
1.6E-05
5.2E-08
1.2E-10
2.0E-09
Maximum
8.5E-05
5.1E-05
2.9E-07
2.8E-10
9.1E-09
Mean
4.5E-05
2.9E-05
1.6E-07
1.8E-10
5.1E-09
Standard deviation
2.7E-05
1.3E-05
8.3E-08
6.5E-10
2.6E-09
Soils around Geghanush tailing dump
Minimum
1.6E-05
6.3E-06
3.4E-08
6.4E-11
1.6E-09
Maximum
4.1E-05
1.8E-05
9.2E-08
1.2E-10
4.3E-09
Mean
3.1E-05
1.2E-05
6.2E-08
9.3E-11
3.0E-09
Standard deviation
1.0E-05
4.8E-06
2.6E-08
2.2E-11
1.1E-09
CONCLUSIONS
Generally, it’s possible to state that the operation of Kapan copper-molybdenum combine caused significant soil
pollution with heavy metals which may have posed non-carcinogenic and even carcinogenic risks to population, mainly
children living in this territory. The highest human health risks were posed especially by Cr the content of which in the
soils may have caused non-carcinogenic health hazards. To mitigate such health risks, policy makers need to implement
strict regulation on mining and industry on containment and discharge of waste and byproducts and to organize soil
recultivation works.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the State Committee of Science MES RA, in the frame of the research project No. 13-
4C202.
33
REFERENCES
[1] Derdzyan T. H., Ghazaryan K. A., Gevorgyan G. A. The investigation of enzymatic activity in the soils under the impact of
metallurgical industrial activity in Lori Marz, Armenia // International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food
and Biotechnological Engineering, 2015, v. 9, No. 5, pp. 439–442.
[2] Gangadhar Z. S. Environmental impact assessment on soil pollution issues about human health // International Research Journal
of Environmental Sciences, 2014, v. 3, No. 11, pp. 78–81.
[3] Gevorgyan G. A., Ghazaryan K. A., Derdzyan T. H. Heavy metal pollution of the soils around the mining area near Shamlugh
town (Armenia) and related risks to the environment // Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Bio-Medical
Engineering and Environmental Technology, 2015, pp. 172–178.
[4] Gevorgyan G. A., Hambaryan L. R., Grigoryan K. V. Minasyan S. H. Heavy metal pollution of the catchment basins of the
Voghchi and Meghriget rivers (Armenia) and risks to the environment associated with water pollution // Academic Journal of
Science, 2013, v. 2, No. 2, pp. 255–268.
[5] Gevorgyan G. A., Mamyan A. S. Hambaryan L. R., Khudaverdyan S. Kh., Vaseashta A. Environmental risk assessment of
heavy metal pollution in Armenian river ecosystems: Case study of Lake Sevan and Debed River catchment basins // Polish
Journal of Environmental Studies, 2016, v. 25, No. 6, pp. 2387–2399.
[6] Gevorgyan G. A., Movsesyan H. S., Grigoryan K. V., Ghazaryan K. A. Environmental risks of heavy metal pollution of the
soils around Kajaran town, Armenia // Proceedings of the Yerevan State University, 2015, v. 237, No. 2, pp. 50–55.
[7] Gevorgyan G. A., Varagyan V. M., Varagyan A. L. Agricultural risk assessment of the heavy metal and mineral salt pollution of
river ecosystems in the Voghji river catchment area // Biological Journal of Armenia, 2016, v. 68, No. 4, pp. 92–97.
[8] Ghazaryan K. A., Gevorgyan G. A., Movsesyan H. S., Ghazaryan N. P., Grigoryan K. V. The evaluation of heavy metal
pollution degree in the soils around the Zangezur copper and molybdenum combine // International Journal of Environmental,
Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering, 2015, v. 9, No. 5, pp. 422–427.
[9] Ghazaryan K., Movsesyan H., Ghazaryan N., Gevorgyan G., Grigoryan K. Soil pollution level of ecologically vulnerable areas
around Kajaran town and ways of their improvement // Chemistry Journal of Moldova, 2014, v. 9, No. 2, pp. 52–57.
[10] Human health risk assessment (Appendix A). Available at: www.tva.gov/kingston/eeca/App%20A%20HHRA.pdf
[11] Kamunda C., Mathuthu M., Madhuku M. Health risk assessment of heavy metals in soils from Witwatersrand gold mining
basin, South Africa // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016, v. 13, No. 7, pp. 1–11.
[12] Liu Ch., Lu L., Huang T., Huang Y., Ding L., Zhao W. The distribution and health risk assessment of metals in soils in the
vicinity of industrial sites in Dongguan, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016, v. 13,
No. 8, pp. 1–17.
[13] Namuhani N., Kimumwe C. Soil contamination with heavy metals around Jinja steel rolling mills in Jinja municipality, Uganda
// Journal of Health and Pollution, 2015, v. 5, No. 9, pp. 61–67.
[14] Nemsadze K., Sanikidze T., Ratiani L., Gabunia L., Sharashenidze T. Mechanisms of lead-induced poisoning // Georgian
Medical News, 2009, v. 172–173, pp. 92–96.
[15] Regional screening level table (RSL) for chemical contaminants at superfund sites. USA, Washington: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 2011.
[16] Saini P. Assessment of soil contamination due to heavy metals: A case study of Rakhial industrial area, Ahmedabad //
International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 2016, v. 2, No. 3, pp. 273–278.
[17] Shi P., Xiao J., Wang Y., Chen L. Assessment of ecological and human health risks of heavy metal contamination in agriculture
soils disturbed by pipeline construction // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2014, v. 11, No.
3, pp. 2504–2520.
[18] U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE): The risk assessment information system (RAIS). USDOE Oak Ridge Operations Office
(ORO). USA, TN, Oak Ridge, 2011.
[19] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Risk Assessment guidance for superfund. Vol. I: Human health evaluation
manual (Part A). USA, DC, Washington: US EPA, (EPA/540/1-89/002), 1989.
[20] USEPA method 3050B: Acid digestion of sediments, sludges and soils. USA, DC, Washington: Environmental Protection
Agency, 1996.