This paper critiques moral frameworks rooted in identity and phenomenal perception, arguing that they divorce moralism from truth by imposing rigid enclosures on reality. It contrasts schooling-a system of epistemic reproduction that reinforces these confines through standardized conditioning-with education, envisioned as technē and vidyābhyāsam, the disciplined practice of revealing truth beyond cultural and historical shackles. Drawing on Indian philosophy, particularly Bhartrhari's sphoṭasiddhi and the interplay of avidyā (pragmatic ignorance) and vidyā (holistic wisdom), it proposes a civilizational dialectic that dismantles false consciousness. This dialectic navigates the tension between the real and the actual, fostering a relational pluriverse over subjective silos. By reframing education as a transformative praxis, the paper advocates a shift from utilitarian metrics, as critiqued in Bloom's Taxonomy, toward an integrative wisdom that aligns with satya (truth), guiding humanity toward authentic understanding and ethical depth. Key Concepts: Pluriverse-Reflects the dynamic, relational tapestry of reality that transcends identity-based enclosures; Vidyābhyāsam-Captures the disciplined practice of attaining holistic wisdom (vidyā) as a transformative educational ideal; Sphoṭasiddhi-Highlights the burst of meaning that liberates understanding from linguistic and cultural constraints; Technē-Represents the art of revealing, distinguishing education's transformative potential from schooling's utilitarian focus; Avidyā-Vidyā-Encapsulates the dialectical interplay between pragmatic ignorance and integrative wisdom central to truth-seeking; Relationalism-Emphasizes the shift from subjective silos to an interconnected, responsive engagement with reality. Every moral framework rooted in identity-whether self-constructed or imposed through rigid categories and expectations-manifests as moralism divorced from truth. Truth does not reside within these confines; it emerges through their dissolution: by questioning the metrics, unraveling the scripts, and dismantling the identities they etch. This unbinding reveals a pluriverse-a vibrant tapestry of relational patterns, co-creating and resonating in endless variation and intensity (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). Schooling, as a system of epistemic reproduction, often entrenches these enclosures, molding individuals for societal roles and employability through standardized measures (Freire, 1970). Education, in contrast, unveils technē-the art of revealing-transcending such confines to foster a civilizational dialectic that challenges false consciousness and propels humanity toward authentic understanding (Heidegger, 1977). Our subjective lenses of discernment do not reflect this pluriverse; they overlay it, weaving a phenomenal fabric of lived experience. Yet this fabric, though vivid, is illusory: an interpretive filter that distorts as much as it discloses (Husserl, 1970). We inhabit this filter, but it traps us in a moral enclosure of perception and projection, skewing even our ethical instincts with subjective dissonance. Schooling reinforces this enclosure through operant conditioning, prioritizing measurable outputs over transformative outcomes, as critiqued in modern educational philosophy