ChapterPDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Our study examines sustainability in the fashion industry, and argues for increasing consumers’ awareness of the natural world, with the goal of broadening their perspectives to include not only personal gratification but also the pressing need to combat processes harmful to nature. By applying traceability—the ability to trace an item through every stage of production—to the realm of fashion supply chains, consumers can make informed purchase decisions based on what appeals to them on a personal level and also on a given item’s environmental and social impact.
Content may be subject to copyright.
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318237366
Sustainability and the Fashion Industry: Conceptualizing Nature and
Traceability
Chapter · May 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51253-2_3
CITATIONS
29
READS
25,623
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
sensory profiling and the wine industry View project
luxury consumption View project
Annamma Joy
University of British Columbia - Okanagan
68 PUBLICATIONS2,663 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Camilo Peña
University of British Columbia - Okanagan
11 PUBLICATIONS78 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Camilo Peña on 24 October 2018.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
3
Sustainability and the Fashion Industry:
Conceptualizing Nature and Traceability
Annamma Joy and Camilo Peña
3.1 Introduction
Arst step in discussing sustainability in fashion is to recognize an
inherent truth: Fashion is a polluting and resource-intensive industry,
even as its future success depends on reducing its environmental and
social imprint across the entire life cycle of garment production. That
means reducing the impact associated with cultivating and producing
textile bres, and establishing a foundation of good practices at all levels.
It also means moving beyond focusing on only a few bre types
typically cotton and polyester, or a blend thereofand creating a
portfolio of alternate bres with low-resource intensity and potentially
rich cultural traditions.
The manufacture of both cotton and polyester bres is detrimental
to the environment, albeit in dierent ways. Cotton has the greatest
negative environmental impact (Butow 2014), given its ubiquity in
A. Joy (*)C. Peña
The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
e-mail: annamma.joy@ubc.ca; camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
© The Author(s) 2017
C.E. Henninger et al. (eds.), Sustainability in Fashion,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51253-2_3
31
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
apparel manufacture. According to the World Wildlife Fund (2016):
Itcantakemorethan20,000litresofwatertoproduce1kgofcotton;
equivalent to a single T-shirt and pair of jeans.Non-organiccotton
production relies on environmentally harmful pesticides; 2.4% of the
worlds crop land is planted with cotton and yet it accounts for 24%
and 11% of the global sales of insecticide and pesticides respectively
according to World Wildlife Fund quoted above. But while polyester
production uses signicantly less water and no pesticides, it requires
more than three times the energy of cotton production (Cherrett et al.
2005). Worse yet, given the lack of sustainability inherent in the
production of both bres, worldwide demand for both is increasing
(Carmichael 2015).
Nylon and wool are detrimental to the environment as well; nylon is
derived from petroleum, and wool requires extensive land use, leading to
over-grazing and generating substantial wastewater during the multiple
washes used to clean wool bres (Defra 2010). Most environmental
impacts, common to all the bres listed above, occur during the produc-
tion and consumption stage (Chapman 2010).
3.2 The Case for Sustainability
Sustainability, as dened by the Brundtland World Commission on
Environment and Development (United Nations 1987) is development
that meets the needs of the present without compromising those of the
future. The consensus of the scientic community states that if devel-
opment continues with business as usual, earths key resources will be
depleted faster than any possible rate of replenishment (Martin and
Schouten 2011), with unsustainable growth setting in motion poten-
tially devastating economic, social, and environmental concerns. We
argue that the concept of producing unlimited goodsa worldview
with roots in the advent of industrial capitalism, with a concomitant
notion that availability of fossil fuel and other non-renewable resources
is limitlessis inherently problematic. Trawick and Hornborg (2015)
suggest that production methods in many developing nations take into
account that resources are limited, which allows for collaborative use of
32 A. Joy and C. Peña
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
such scarce resources as water. To achieve sustainability, industries in
developed nations must take the same approach, which necessitates
embracing decreased consumption. We believe that the time is past
due to revisit the notion of the limited good.
In the management literature, Gladwin et al. (1995) consider the
predominance of a technocentric paradigm in business markets, in
contrast to its ecocentric counterpart. Balancing both perspectives results
in what the authors term a sustaincentric worldview. We use their
framework to evaluate fast and slow fashion and dene the primary
elements of a sustaincentric perspective within the fashion industry. In
technocentrism, humans have the right to exploit naturethey are in
essence superior to nature, as viewed through an anthropocentric hier-
archy with humans at the pinnacle. In this view, nature is instrumental
and monetarily quantiablea commodity for the asking, with an
implied assumption that economic growth and technological innovation
preclude considerations of future generations and resources. In the
technocentric worldview, as the authors argue, the economy is a closed
system isolated from nature, where exchange value circulates only
between industries and households. Human wants are unlimited; the
corresponding ideal of a good life dominates. Consequently, individuals
act to maximize their own utility, as predicated by the optimal economic
framework of laissezfaire capitalism. In the ethos of ethnocentrism,
more growth is not just good, but is actually the best of all possible
worlds.
Technocentrism is open to criticism, in that it ignores the interde-
pendence of human and natural capital. An emphasis on global e-
ciency suppresses attention to an appropriate ecological scale and the fair
distribution of resources, property rights, and social constructs such as
fair labour practices. Reliance on the ecient operations of markets
ignores marginalized segments of society including women, children,
and future generations. Technocentrism promotes dualistic thinking in
placing the natural world and human nature in opposition, thus limiting
or even severing the connections between these two realms that are
central to sustainable thinking.
Because technocentrism is anthropocentric, it elevates men over women
(Warren 1994) given that women are, through their potential for creating
3 Sustainability and the Fashion Industry: Conceptualizing ... 33
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
life and their perceived role as nurturers, stereotypically associated with
nature, as well as the reverse (i.e. the phrase mother nature). In the view
of many (e.g. Gladwin et al. 1995) technocentrism supports a growth
dependent on markets, and thereby perpetuates inequality, privileging a
wealthy minority at the expense of the larger community. To a large
extent, the decline in renewable resources, increased pollution, and
inequality are well-documented as the inevitable results of technocentrism
(Gladwin et al. 1995; Martin and Schouten 2011).
In response to technocentrism, the ecocentric worldview emerged
(Bailey and Wilson 2009). In this view, human capital and natural
capital are complementary: Humans dependent on ecological abundance
(Gladwin et al. 1995, p. 887). Thus, humans co-exist with nature rather
than rule it, and changes in human action have ripple eects on nature,
and the reverse. Holistic rather than dualistic thinking is paramount to
this paradigm, with ethical priority accorded to the whole rather than
the individual. The good lifetherefore calls for voluntary simplicity
and a reduction in the consumption of material goods, with inequality
ameliorated through redistribution. The task of preserving natural capi-
tal is paramount.
Ecocentrism by its nature downplays the intellectual capacity of
humans, in that it does not directly address poverty and human rights,
given its emphasis on ecology over economics and social factors.
Ecocentrism, the above authors note, falls short on oering practical
solutions in a world increasingly ravaged by human activity, and fails to
integrate cultural and natural goals. As a more eective alternative, the
authors argue in favour of sustaincentrism. In common with ecocentrism,
sustaincentrism embraces the interdependence of nature and humans, the
importance of satisfying non-material needs in non-material ways, and
reducing preoccupation with materialism. However, in sustaincentrism,
ecological and social externalities are internalized, with ecology, econom-
ics, and ethics inextricably intertwined. Sustaincentrism focuses on the
interrelatedness of events and actions, and advocates that all human values
depend on a healthy, ecological, economic, and social context, combining
ecocentrism with pragmatic economic and social considerations.
In this view, earth must be preserved through respectful stewardship
in current contexts. While humans are part of the biosphere, human
34 A. Joy and C. Peña
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
intellect is recognized. Ethics, according to the above authors are
broadly homocentric, grounded in the good of both human and non-
human nature. Sustaincentric ethics actively embrace the full conceptua-
lization of political, civil, social, economic and cultural human rights
(ibid., p. 891). The temporal frame covers both intra-generational and
inter-generational responsibilities: equity and foresight.
Extraction and use of natural resources must be limited due to the
vulnerability of nature to support such actions; at the very least, such
actions should be below the levels at which the deterioration of natural
systems can occur. Technologies can be developed, but must be used
ethically. Ecology and economy are not in opposition, but safeguards
must be in place such that exploitation will be minimized. Poverty is
eliminated through fair labour practices and expanding social services.
Growth without end, unfolding within a closed system, is deemed
untenable.
While sustainability concerns were not crucial to the fashion industry
in the past, trends are changing, as key players promote more ecologi-
cally forward-thinking fashion production processes and consumption
(Henninger et al. 2016). One movement in particular, formed by many
key stakeholders, is slow fashion.
3.3 Slow Versus Fast Fashion
Slow fashion, in common with slow food, stands in opposition to
industrialization and homogeneity, or McDonaldization(Ritzer
2011). In the ideology of slow fashion, artisanship and long-term utility
trump fast fashions catering to short-term gratication, with consumers
experiencing constant demand for new products (Barnes and Lea-
Greenwood 2006). An article of fast fashion is the essence of planned
obsolescence, designed to fray after a set number of wearings (often as
few as 10): Fast fashions raison detre is volume over quality. Producing
clothing quickly and cheaply inevitably devalues human labour and
ecologically responsible production materials and methods. To devotees
of fast fashion, the environmental and social costs embodied by such
clothing, as they are in fast food, are immaterial.
3 Sustainability and the Fashion Industry: Conceptualizing ... 35
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
Clark (2008) views slow fashion as sustainable fashion solutions, based
on the repositioning of strategies of design, production, consumption, use,
and reuse, which are emerging alongside the global fashion system, and are
posing a potential challenge to it. The slow approach oers more sustain-
able and ethical ways of being fashionable that have implications for
design, production, consumption, and use(ibid., p. 428). Moreover,
an ideology of attentiveness and mindfulness of the various stakeholders
involved in fashion production (Fletcher 2008) encourages identifying
fashions underlying values and economic priorities (Fletcher 2010).
The slow fashion movement proposes to retake the values of quality
oering fewer but more durable items. Slow fashion companies oer two
fashion collections per year; in contrast, fast fashion businesses produce as
many as 20 (Henninger et al. 2016). Such rapid turnover encourages
impulse purchases and frequent visits to retail stores to check on an ever-
changing selection, as what was purchased only a few weeks earlier is now
passé. The fastin fast fashion refers not only to the speed of production
but also to the speed with which consumers desire continuous novelty.
While seemingly innite varieties of products are on oer, economies of
scale and industrial production limit what can actually be produced. Thus,
cotton and polyester dominate, even as a sustainable fashion industry
requires greater bre variety, such as organic cotton, hemp, bamboo,
and lyocell. Polyester is dependent on oil as its source; moving away
from petroleum may be essential in fostering sustainable production.
Fast fashion elicits contradictory consumer behaviours in the context
of sustainability. Consumers who diligently select food products based
on ethical, health, and environmental concerns may have no such
concerns for apparel products (Joy et al. 2012). Why consumers would
be more concerned with the provenance of what they eat versus what
they wear is a conundrum, a display of cognitive dissonance. While
media may downplay awareness of social and environmental issues in
apparel production (Morgan and Birtwistle 2009), it is nonetheless
consumers themselves who lack an interest in questioning and critiquing
apparel supply chains. When it comes to clothing purchases, consumers,
at a visceral level, appear to feel that the less they know about how their
new clothes were manufactured the better.
36 A. Joy and C. Peña
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
For change to occur, as Fletcher (2014, p. XVI) notes, a more holistic
approach is essentialthe cumulative values, discernments, habits of
mind, industrial practices, business models, economic logic, deep societal
forces and aggregated industrial practices that make up the fashion and
textile sector. Understanding sustainability requires a systems approach
because it depends on production steps working in concert rather than on
any one step viewed in isolation. The overarching framework consists of
materials, processes, people, design, and speed for promoting sustainabil-
ity. As Fletcher (2014, p. XVII) argues, Sustainability in fashion and
textiles fosters ecological integrity, social quality and human ourishing
through products, action, relationships and practices of use.
The fashion industry as a whole must create consumer desire for limited
consumption of high-quality slow fashion as opposed to frequent con-
sumption of low-quality fast fashion. The business model must change,
while recognizing that small-scale breproductionmustbeprocessedat
multiple locations near markets, which can increase its footprint. Much as
the lure of certain wines is linked to their specic place of production, so
fashion can stoke interest in place-specicbres, designs, and dyes.
Traceability and the notion of nature are key to fostering a more respon-
sible and ethical consumption of apparel products. Furthermore, a connec-
tion between apparel products and nature will foster more scrutiny of
environmental issues in apparel production. We believe that by not only
building awareness of fast fashions ecological and social harmfulness but also
promoting the benets of slow fashion and sustainabilityin part via trace-
ability initiativesconsumersfashion and apparel purchase behaviour will
more likely be inuenced by ethical considerations, in a sea change from
previous consumer fashion purchase behaviour (Joergens 2006).
3.4 Consumer Awareness and a New Market
for Ethical Products
As with other environmental and social movements, the quest for cleaner
and fairer fashion supply chains needs leaders. Some may come from
marginalized market segments, such as those dissatised with current
3 Sustainability and the Fashion Industry: Conceptualizing ... 37
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
market oerings and seeking more choice. One trigger for mobilization is
the development of a collective identity (Scaraboto and Fischer 2013). We
argue that by channelling images of nature through transparency in
the supply chain, and connecting those images with the nal product
(i.e. fashion apparel), critical consumers can forge a collective identity, a
bloc concerned with sustainability, which can eventually aect the market.
In community-supported agriculture, for example, consumers and entre-
preneurs have created a countervailing market response to the co-optation
of countercultural movements into dominant and mainstream forms
(Thompson and Coskuner-Bali 2007), presenting a planned mobilization
towards market change, in accordance with Scaraboto and Fischers(2013)
analysis. Such responses can change a market segment signicantly, leading
to the production and promotion of oerings distinct from those provided
by mainstream markets.
Dolbec and Fischer (2015) analyse the impact of consumers engaged
in market dynamics without a specic coordinated plan, in the specic
context of the fashion industry. In such cases, change can be profound,
and also accidental. As a means of inciting change within fashion,
consumers who make their desire for sustainable garments known may
well have the power to push the industry to meet their needs. If the
consumer market is there, the product line will follow.
3.5 The Role of Traceability
Traceability arose in the mid-1980s as a means to reassure consumers
about the safety of food products, as increasing fears of contamination led
consumers to seek information on how their food was grown or raised
(Penton Media 2011). Until the mid-1980s, traceability was used primar-
ily for logistical purposes, providing a means of managing inventory and
production (Bonnin and Ngo 2009). Following a series of crises in the
European food industry, increased transparency regarding the steps
involved along the supply chain from producers to consumers was clearly
needed. The development of traceability programs eventually took hold in
the USA and Canada, between 2003 and 2004, after the mad cow disease
case in Washington state (Pouliot and Sumner 2008). Food producers
38 A. Joy and C. Peña
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
needed traceability to protect the reputation of their brands, and to
guarantee their productsorigins (ibid), by tracing products within a
specic facility or along a supply chain (Bellon-Maurel et al. 2014).
Traceability is viewed as a necessity in the food industry, with top
chefs along with other food representatives pioneering the use of trace-
ability (Penton Media 2011). The local farm-to-table food movement
has further pushed traceability to the forefront. Many industries have
incorporated traceability as a key asset in achieving superior quality
(Suber 2012). Organizations that adopt traceability can make their
supply chains more ecient and adaptable (Galliano and Orozco 2013).
3.6 Traceability Equals Transparency
While traceability in the context of food products is primarily a means of
conrming food safety and adherence to health concerns and dietary
restrictions, with an emphasis on animal welfare concerns, in the apparel
industry traceability results in transparency, in that it informs customers
of the environmental impact of clothing and production, and of the
labour conditions involved in production and manufacturing. Tracing
all apparel products and certifying transparency in the supply chain
could be benecial in both boosting the demand for responsibly made
products, and in making products manufactured under questionable
conditions less appealing.
For consumers with specic ethical concerns in mind, traceability
systems are needed to ensure a product is in line with their values
(Robert-Demontrond 2009). For this market niche, supply chains
must be transparent and open to both certication and third-party
assessments to reduce the practice of green-washing(presenting a
product as green(sustainable) without any reliable verication). It
can be dicult to verify certain ethical claims from supply chains. For
certain objective and measurable indicators such as energy and water
usage, supply chains might easily report and assess their own perfor-
mances, but for more subjective and dicult-to-measure indicators, such
as working conditions, safety policies, and animal welfare, third-party
monitoring and evaluation are crucial.
3 Sustainability and the Fashion Industry: Conceptualizing ... 39
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
For measurable and quantiable indicators, life cycle assessment
(LCA), a method for evaluating the environmental performance of
products and services, can be implemented along the supply chain.
Such evaluation can be complex, requiring signicant time and resources.
LCA dates back to the 1970s, when pollution control, energy eciency,
and others gained public currency; its public appeal continues to spread
(Guinée et al. 2011).
From an ethical standpoint, corporations at least theoretically have
an obligation to inform consumers about the environmental impact of
their products, following consumersown concerns for the morality of
their agency (Del Savio and Schmietow 2013). Over time, some
companies have adopted a moral approach, as traceability evolved
from health crisis prevention to an assurance of quality, certied, and
sustainable choices. Current discourses of natural,organic,and
localproducts have pushed traceabilitys implementation into smal-
ler supply chains, with regulated denitions and certications backing
up such claims.
Tracing apparel items back to their raw materials and manufacturing
processes can be daunting. In some cases, trust becomes central to the
relationship between suppliers and apparel manufacturers, which then
translates to eco-labels that inform consumers about the certied processes
implemented in supply chains (Henninger 2015). However, not all eco-
labels face thorough scrutiny. Both in the literature and in our own
interviews with apparel industry stakeholders, aws are readily apparent.
If third parties involved in certication receive a percentage from the sales
of certied products, the assessment for certied procedures may relax or
simply not happen at all. Manufacturing entities along the supply chain
whose processes have been deemed acceptable may sub-contract to other,
smaller entities, whose sourcing or manufacturing processes may be
entirely unknown. Such complications and deceptions have led some
consumers and stakeholders to doubt certifying agencies and eco-labels.
The entire supply chain, from bre production through product creation,
must be transparent for certication to be truly eective.
Traceability and certication often involve higher costs for consu-
mers, if a producer shifts the costs of traceability initiatives to a products
nal price. Poghosyan et al. (2004) argue that traceability should
40 A. Joy and C. Peña
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
command a price premium when public welfare benets or competitive
advantages result. Tsakiridou et al. (2011) suggest that traceability is an
added value, and therefore worthy of a price premium. Spanish beef
consumers, as an example, disagree. They see providing food safety as a
minimum responsibility for producers, and are unwilling to pay a
premium for a guarantee of safety (Angulo et al. 2005). Thus, guarantees
can be seen as either an added benet, or as one that should routinely be
available as a matter of corporate responsibility.
When we track a product to its dierent processes and actors, we
confront the realities of outsourcing to low-wage countries, and of a
given products hidden costs, such as labourers trapped in deplorable
working conditions, and polluted air, water, and soil. These realities,
especially in food and apparel, are heavily connected to the concept of
nature. Since agricultural crops are these productsorigins, there is
always a starting point on the land. Nature is the rst supplier.
3.7 Nature
Nature can be studied from many perspectives and understood as a
combination of material and discursive elements. Neither an external
objective nor a purely socially constructed entity, nature is a uid
and contested eect of assembling material and discursive elements
(Canniford and Shankar 2013).
In studies of the subjective and symbolic perspectives of nature, we see
that individuals rely on nature for identity creation purposes as part of a
specic agenda and in opposition to an alternate discourse (Luedicke et al.
2010). Collective meanings and ideals can shape a groups identity (ibid.).
As Belk (1988) shows, the extension of self can operate at an individual
and a collective level, contributing to consumersidentities. As de Burgh-
Woodman and King (2013)argue,theconceptofthehuman/nature
connection is tied to a symbolically sustainable discourse, which often
does not extend beyond a material/practical statement. This human-
nature connection as a construct in Western cultural discourse can be
traced back to Greek mythology in its turbulent relationship with natural
elements, as represented by each Greek deity. The relationship with nature
3 Sustainability and the Fashion Industry: Conceptualizing ... 41
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
and the human/nature connection have evolved over time; todays related
discourses are necessarily linked to and often driven by the development of
environmentalism.
Along with the writings of the naturalists, activists, and environmen-
tal philosophers Aldo Leopard, John Muir, and Henry David Thoreau,
Rachel CarsonsSilent Spring(1962) stands out as one of the most
inuential gures in environmentalism (Griswold 2012). Some suggest
her work gave birth to the modern environmental movement (Michaud
2010). Carson opposed the Christian belief that nature existed to serve
man and argued that technological innovations such as pesticides,
through which humans seek to control nature, would disrupt earths
natural ecosystem (Carson 1962; Michaud 2010). The notion of accept-
ing our collective societal role as stewards of this fragile ecosystem is
criticized in the environmental ethics literature for having anthropo-
centric, speciesist, and sexist connotations (Welchman 2012).
The environmental movement has spread into dierent areas from its
original opposition to pesticides in particular and pollution in general to
include opposition to genetically modied organisms (GMOs). Vandana
Shiva, an Indian environmental activist, embraces this opposition, stat-
ing that GMOstands for God, Move Over, although not without
criticism from the media (e.g. Entine 2015; Specter 2014) and academic
writers (e.g. Gilbert 2013; Herring 2006). Shiva argues that pre-colonial
North America, in having unity in feminine and masculine principles,
engendered stronger ecological values than those brought to the New
World by European culture (McGurty 2011). Without feminine values,
Shiva argues, men would separate from women and nature, and ecolo-
gical disaster would occur; the eco-feminist women tree huggers (who
form handholding circles around trees to prevent deforestation) from the
Chipko Movement in northern India embody this necessary feminine
principle required for preventing ecological catastrophe (ibid.).
Perhaps in a reection of the distrust endemic to many environmental
discourses (as seen, e.g. in corporate green-washing), the term tree
huggeris ocially identied in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary as
someone who is regarded as foolish or annoying because of being too
concerned about protecting trees, animals, and other parts of the natural
world from pollution and other threats.
42 A. Joy and C. Peña
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
Moreover, the formerly straightforward environmental model of sus-
tainable agricultural production embodied by organic food has become a
set of standards adapted to the demands of large corporate farming
(Thompson and Coskuner-Balli 2007).
How can environmental discourses align with fashion to oer a
veridic and inspiring call to change? How can they dierentiate from
vague green-washing claims that have created more antagonists against
than supporters for sustainability? We propose a return to a simple,
romantic nature, where consumers can detach from everyday life and be
immersed in a separate space.
3.8 Romantic Discourses of Nature
Canniford and Shankar (2013) consider sublime, sacred, and primitive
discourses to be unied into the romantic ideology of an external
nature serving as the quintessential romantic concept, where the pure
self can be freed of the limitations of family, gender, and other social
roles (Illouz 1997). Participation in romantic experiences of nature
gives individuals sources of stability, joy, and ecstasy, and possibly
even provide meaning to life (Belk et al. 1989). Individuals routinely
try to commune with nature when they undergo romantic experiences;
Native Americans are considered to have perfected the dynamics of
living in harmony with nature (Arnould and Price 1993). Many
advertising eorts have built a level of expectation around the sacred
pilgrimage towards parts of the world still untouched by humankind
(Belk et al. 1989).
In communion with nature, we rely on nature (e.g. having an aware-
ness of time based solely on tracking the sun and moon (Arnould and
Price 1993)). This reliance can be seen in other contexts, such as when
nature is an external force that can be neither controlled nor tamed; thus
human activities are left to the mercy of nature, a state that aligns with
the primitive discourse of nature, whose sublime and sacred constructs
oppose the modern, industrial, and stressful way of living (Canniford
and Shankar 2013). Re-enacting past practices that might seem rustic
and countercultural becomes a means of evoking a nostalgic and heroic
3 Sustainability and the Fashion Industry: Conceptualizing ... 43
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
time when life was simpler (Belk and Costa 1998); in such contexts,
nature is revered and a quasireligious naturalismis evidenced, aligned
with the sacred discourse of nature (ibid. 234).
3.9 Tracing Nature
Having discussed the relevance of traceability to the fashion industry and
the notion of nature as a key element in identity construction, we turn to
assembling a discourse that fosters sustainably produced apparel via
traceability and protects nature (the external environment) from harm.
Arst step is to embed nature into the fashion discourse through a
holistic view in which each item of apparel cannot be divorced from its
origins in nature and manufacture. Once a garment is experienced both
as one component and as part of nature, perceptions towards this item
change markedly, much as might happen with food; when we build
awareness of the animals and processes involved in creating a hamburger
patty, we see it from a dierent angle.
The transparency engendered by traceability creates awareness of the
exploitation involved in apparel productionnot only of such tragedies
as the 2013 Rana Plaza collapse in Dhaka, Bangladesh, the single dead-
liest clothing factory accident in history but also of the day-to-day
nightmare of low-wage labour (Joy 2013). In response to searing images
from Rana Plaza, consumers, politicians, NGOs, academics, and other
stakeholders scrutinized how such factories are run, aiming their outrage
in particular at apparel brands that sourced from this specic factory,
such as Walmart, Benetton, Joe Fresh, Mango, and Primark, among
others. Such events open consumerseyes to the costs, borne by others,
of cheaply made clothing, and have pushed companies and their supply
chains to be more transparent.
We cannot stall until a new mass tragedy occurs in another part of the
supply chain to increase awareness, particularly since every step of the
supply chain has the potential for setting in motion lethal events, such as
pollution, whose impact is gradual and does not necessarily generate
headlines (i.e. wearing masks on city streets to protect ones ability to
breathe incrementally becomes a normalized activity). Once traceability
44 A. Joy and C. Peña
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
of an entire supply chain has been ensured, transparency can be apparent
and processes certied. This information may now be passed on to
brands that can construct a story on how each garment has been
made, whether it is organic and features natural dyes, for example; and
on the value of consumers making choices that support sustainability.
Deepening the story might include discourses on protecting the envir-
onment and communion with nature, allowing an individual to see the
article of clothing, the plant source of bres, the artisans involved in
manufacture, and nature itself within a holistic view in which each
element is connected to the whole. Once an article of clothing is no
longer experienced in a vacuum, with its environmental and social
impact visible for all to see, consumers become aware of their role in
that impact.
Figure 3.1 summarizes the model presented in this chapter. The
current fashion apparel discourse is disconnected from nature; consu-
mers do not see an article of apparel as part of nature but rather as a
product of industrial processes, unlike in the world of organic food, for
Awareness:
*New market
*Change to
current market
Current Model Proposed Model
Nature
Apparel
piece
Apparel
piece
Consumers
Other
products
(e.g. food)
Nature
Consumers
Traceability
New nature–
fashion/apparel
discourse
Fig. 3.1 Current vs. proposed fashion apparel model
3 Sustainability and the Fashion Industry: Conceptualizing ... 45
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
example, where consumers may know the exact origin of specic
produce items, meat, or eggs, for example, and are thus connected to
the sources of their products in nature. The new model we propose ties
the construction of nature (as symbolic capital) with fashion apparel
through a process of traceability. Implementing transparency in the
supply chains will ideally facilitate the creation of new markets, and
will drive deep changes in the current market, by encouraging con-
sumer demand for slow fashion. Thanks to these new dynamics,
ignited by traceability and conveyed through marketing and branding
tools, a new perspective of fashion as an extension of nature will
emerge.
3.10 Discussion
Slow fashion aligns consumption with consumer ideals of protecting the
natural world. Consumers who perceive their identities as incorporating
both an appreciation for of-the-moment fashion and a commitment to
the environment will likely nd this symbolic value both meaningful
and indicative of new approaches to consumption. To embrace that
goal, slow fashion must focus on a sustaincentric paradigm; only
through responsible processes can high-quality and ethical products be
produced. Once the fashion industry commits to sustainability, trace-
ability is the sole eective method for certifying the industrys adherence
to the ideals of slow fashion.
Tracing becomes imperative once certication is accepted commer-
cially as essential. Consumers want reassurance that the labels and
certications they see on apparel products are genuine, which can only
happen when every raw material, supplier, transportation mode, and
process is tracked from the source. Because any apparel company will
have an innate conict of interest in marketing the green qualities of a
given garmentdescribing a garment as sustainable instantly justies a
higher priceexternalizing tracing services can eliminate such conict
by maintaining transparency. After fashion companies have implemen-
ted tracing processes, certication should be done by third parties
untainted by any possible appearance of professional quid pro quo.
46 A. Joy and C. Peña
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
In showing the practices used throughout a supply chain and show-
casing nature as the rst supplier of all apparel items, the fashion world
can heighten consumersconnection to nature. Once consumers become
more aware of the processes involved in apparel production, this con-
nection with nature may ignite a new perspective on clothing, one that
actively wants sustainably produced bres and manufacturing processes,
and that sees slow fashion, despite the higher cost, as far more desirable
indeed, as imperativein comparison with fast fashion. As the dis-
interest in environmental issues implicit in the production and con-
sumption of fast fashion becomes ever more widely recognized,
consumers will inevitably be faced with whether they are motivated in
their consumption patterns primarily by short-term gratication, or by
their commitment to long-term sustainability values. While these values
are in and of themselves symbolic, their impact on the actual environ-
ment is undeniably both real and immediate.
The slow fashion ideal of quality and longevity will become appealing
once each garment embodies nature from the consumersperspective.
Once we see more than the piece of apparelonce we see in our minds
eye the entire process of producing a garmentthe value of longevity
and quality becomes an associated necessity of the newly built relation-
ship between the consumer and the product. This new built image will
necessarily be constructed from a deep understanding of the product
story; consumers interested in the sources of their products have sophis-
ticated questions and demands. Supercial commitments and shallow
slogans were never enough. Once a holistic sense of nature binds con-
sumers to the earth and to each otheronce clothing becomes more
than a representation of personal style and self-presentation via move-
ment, texture, design, colour, and the like, and in addition becomes an
expression of personal dedication to sustainabilitytrue, veriable com-
mitment will be not simply desired but also required.
For companies to have a prot motivation to implement sustainable
practices, traceability, and to connect their products with nature,
demand must exist: new, larger markets must come into being. As a
rst approach to engaging such markets, codifying the link between
natures discourse and the fashion apparel industry, as argued above, has
the ability to be eective. The new market creation process is, in its
3 Sustainability and the Fashion Industry: Conceptualizing ... 47
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
essence, a clash between brand images, as market creation involves social
legitimation, and an innovation that actually discourages frequent con-
sumption may be viewed as contradicting social norms, values, and
institutions (Giesler 2012). For many consumers, frequent shopping is
a pastime that provides pleasure, with each new purchase providing a
temporary sensation of excitement and promise. Why not indulge, when
indulging feels good? Slow fashion, in contrast, encourages a modicum
of self-restraint, of purchasing for long-term gain rather than only short-
term pleasure. What happens when consumers are presented with a
dierent approach to consumption when doppelgänger brand images
(a family of disparaging images and stories about a brand ...circulated
in popular culture ...(Thompson et al. 2006, p. 50)) introduce brand
meanings that might inuence consumersbeliefs and behaviours (ibid.)?
Such images already dene lower-end apparel companies as connected to
factories featuring dangerous and even lethal working conditions.
3.11 Future Research
Our research presents a clear categorization of the discourses on nature
and traceability applicable to sustainable fashion, and will benet com-
panies implementing transparent traceability standards. It is by necessity
limited, given the lack of empirical evidence (excluding secondary data
derived from previous empirical research). Future research in the timely
areas of consumer and producer perceptions of nature and traceability,
and their interrelationship with sustainability, will be necessary to
empirically validate our ndings.
An interesting avenue for future inquiry concerns the origins of the
cognitive dissonance that enables consumers to follow a sustainable
ideology when purchasing food, or engaging in recycling practices, but
to shelve their ideology when choosing apparel. Food nurtures; if it also
harms, its very denition is at stake, concerns which are less relevant in
apparel products (Joy et al. 2012). Does this fact explain consumers
contradictory approaches to their purchases? Or is this contradiction
derived from consumer distance from the sources and processes involved
in creating fashion? Moreover, consumers may not trust traceability
48 A. Joy and C. Peña
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
certications and eco-labels, viewing them with suspicion as advertising
rather than truthful statement.
Price is certainly an issue when facing a choice between sustainably
produced slow fashion and low-cost fast fashion. While organic food has
higher prices than the alternatives, the price dierential is nonetheless not
hugely signicant; because consumers purchase food repeatedly, the
higher cost is accrued over time. The pricing for eco-conscious clothing,
however, is signicant compared to fast fashion, and the high price is far
harder to ignore, unless cost is of no import. Fastfashion garments will
undoubtedly be of lower quality with a shorter life span, but fastfashion
adherents seek gratication in the moment. What processes can eectively
wean consumers from focusing only on short-term gratication? How can
consumers develop such strong emotional need for sustainable clothing
that price is no longer a deterrent? As we argue, connection to the natural
world can ameliorate consumer distance from the natural and human cost
of their clothing, but what marketing campaigns will be most eective in
conveying this connection? How can corporations accustomed to keeping
costs low to encourage higher sales accept a new approach, of accepting
higher production and manufacturing costs for the greater good? Such
questions are worthy of further exploration.
The battle between brand images and ideals in the fashion industry is
increasingly gathering steam, as recognition of global climate change and
human injustice takes centre stage in consumersawareness. The result-
ing structures and discourses will change markets and relationships
between consumers and producers in ways we can imagine, but not
yet fully foresee. We can safely assume, however, that the implications of
these changes will be far-reaching, deeply aecting how consumers reach
purchase decisions and construct identities of the self within the context
of an imperilled natural world.
References
Angulo, A. M., Gil, J. M., & Tamburo, L. (2005). Food Safety and
ConsumersWillingness to Pay for Labelled Beef in Spain. Journal of Food
Products Marketing,11(3): 89105.
3 Sustainability and the Fashion Industry: Conceptualizing ... 49
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
Arnould, E. J., & Price, L. L. (1993). River Magic: Extraordinary
Experience and the extended Service Encounter. Journal of Consumer
Research,20(1): 2445.
Bailey, I., & Wilson, G. A. (2009). Theorising Transitional Pathways in
Response to Climate Change: Technocentrism, Ecocentrism, and the
Carbon Economy. Environment and Planning A,41(10): 23242341.
Barnes, L., & Lea-Greenwood, G. (2006). Fast Fashioning the Supply Chain:
Shaping the Research Agenda. Journal of Fashion Marketing and
Management,10(3): 259271.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer
Research,15(2): 139168.
Belk,R.W.,&Costa,J.A.(1998).TheMountainManMyth:AContemporary
Consuming Fantasy. Journal of Consumer Research,25(3): 218240.
Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry, Jr., J. F. (1989). The Sacred and the
Profane in Consumer Behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey. Journal of
Consumer Research,16(1): 138.
Bellon-Maurel, V., Short, M. D., Roux, P., Schulz, M., & Peters, G. M. (2014).
Streamlining Life Cycle Inventory Data Generation in Agriculture using
Traceability Data and Information and Communication TechnologiesPart
I: Concepts and Technical Basis. Journal of Cleaner Production,69:6066.
Bonnin, C. A., & Ngo, M.-A. (2009). Enjeux juridiques de la traçabilité
alimentaire. Gestion 2000,26(3): 93108.
Butow, J. (2014). Sustainability Issues and Strategies in the Outdoor Apparel
Brand Industry. Master of Environmental Studies Capastone Projects,
Department of Earth and Environmental Science (online), retrieved from:
http://repository.upenn.edu/mes_capstones/60, [accessed on 29/08/2016].
Canniford, R., & Shankar, A. (2013). Purifying Practices: How Consumers
Assemble Romantic Experiences of Mature. Journal of Consumer Research,
39(5): 10511069.
Carmichael,A.(2015).Man-MadeFibersContinueToGrow.TextileWorld
(online), retrieved from: http://www.textileworld.com/textile-world/ber-
world/2015/02/man-made-bers-continue-to-grow/, [accessed on: 23/09/
2016].
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Houghton Miin: New York.
Chapman, A. (2010). Mistra Future FashionReview of Life Cycle
Assessments of Clothing. MISTRA (online), retrieved from: http://www.
oakdenehollins.co.uk/media/232/2010_mistra_review_of_life_cycle_assess
ments_of_clothing.pdf, [accessed on: 23/09/2016].
50 A. Joy and C. Peña
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
Cherrett, N., Barrett, J., Clemett, A., Chadwick, M., & Chadwick, M. J. (2005).
Ecological Footprint and Water Analysis of Cotton, Hemp and Polyester.
Stockholm Environment Institute (online), retrieved from: https://www.sei-
international.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/SEI-Report-
EcologicalFootprintAndWaterAnalysisOfCottonHempAndPolyester-2005.
pdf, [accessed on: 23/09/2016].
Clark, H. (2008). Slow + Fashion An Oxymoron or a Promise for the
Future ...?Fashion Theory Journal of Dress Body and Culture,12(4): 427446.
De Burgh-Woodman, H., & King, D. (2013). Sustainability and the Human/
Nature Connection: a Critical Discourse Analysis of Being Symbolically
Sustainable. Consumption Markets & Culture,16(2): 145168.
Defra. (2010). The Role and Business Case for Existing and Emerging Fibres in
Sustainable Clothing. Department for Environment Food and Rural Aairs
(online), retrieved from: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=
Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=2&ProjectID=
16095, [accessed on: 23/09/2016].
Del Savio, L., & Schmietow, B. (2013). Environmental Footprint of
Foods: The Duty to Inform. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental
Ethics,26:787796.
Dolbec, P.-Y., & Fischer, E. (2015). Refashioning a Field? Connected
Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets. Journal of Consumer
Research,41(6): 14471468.
Entine, J. (2015, January). Eco-WarriorVandana Shiva, at $40,000 a Speech,
Rejoins Hawaii Anti-GMO Crusade, But Truth Is the Victim. The Hungton
Post (online), retrieved from http://www.hungtonpost.com/jon-entine/eco
warrior-vandana-shiva-_b_6528032.html, [accessed on 01/08/2016].
Fletcher, K. (2008). Sustainable Fashion & Textiles: Design Journeys. Earthscan:
Oxford.
Fletcher, K. (2010). Slow Fashion: An Invitation for Systems Change. Fashion
Practice,2(2): 259266.
Fletcher, K. (2014). Sustainable Fashion and Textiles: Design Journeys, 2nd edn.
Routledge: New York.
Galliano, D., & Orozco, L. (2013). New Technologies and Firm Organization:
The Case of Electronic Traceability Systems in French Agribusiness.
Industry & Innovation,20(1): 2247.
Giesler, M. (2012). How Doppelgänger Brand Images Inuence the Market
Creation Process: Longitudinal Insights from the Rise of Botox Cosmetic.
Journal of Marketing,76(6): 5568.
3 Sustainability and the Fashion Industry: Conceptualizing ... 51
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
Gilbert, N. (2013). A Hard Look at GM Crops. Nature,497(7447): 2426.
Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T.-S. (1995). Shifting Paradigms for
Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and
Research. The Academy of Management Review,20(4): 874907.
Griswold, E. (2012, September). How Silent SpringIgnited the
Environmental Movement. The New York Times (online), retrieved from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/23/magazine/how-silent-spring-ignited-
the-environmental-movement.html, [accessed on 01/08/2016]
Guinée, J. B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici,
R., Ekvall, T., & Rydberg, T. (2011). Life Cycle Assessment: Past, Present,
and Future. Environmental Science & Technology,45(1): 9096.
Henninger, C. E. (2015). Traceability the New Eco-label in the Slow-fashion
Industry?Consumer Perceptions and Micro-organisations Responses.
Sustainability,7: 60116032.
Henninger, C., Alevizou, P. J., Oates, C. J., & Cheng, R. (2016).
Communicating Sustainability: The Case of Slow-Fashion Micro-organiza-
tions, in A. Genus (ed.) Sustainable Consumption: Design, Innovation and
Practice, Chapter 6: 8396. Springer International: Cham, Switzerland.
Herring, R. J. (2006). Why did Operation Cremate MonsantoFail?: Science
and Class in Indias Great Terminator-Technology Hoax. Critical Asian
Studies,38(4): 467493.
Illouz, E. (1997). Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural
Contradictions of Capitalism. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.
Joergens, C. (2006). Ethical Fashion: Myth or Future Trend? Journal of Fashion
Marketing and Management,10(3): 360371.
Joy, A. (2013). Fast Fashion, Luxury Brands and Sustainability. www.world
nincialreview.com/p=738 (July 13) (editors choice)
Joy, A., Sherry, Jr., J. F., Venkatesh, A., Wang, J., & Chan, R. (2012). Fast
Fashion, Sustainability, and the Ethical Appeal of Luxury Brands. Fashion
Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body & Culture,16(3): 273296.
Luedicke, M. K., Thompson, C. J., & Giesler, M. (2010). Consumer Identity
Work as Moral Protagonism: How Myth and Ideology Animate a Brand-
Mediated Moral Conict. Journal of Consumer Research,36(6): 10161032.
Martin, D., & Schouten, J. (2011). Sustainable Marketing. Pearson Prentice
Hall: New Jersey, USA.
McGurty, E. M. (2011). Environmentalism and identity-politics, in A. Elliot (ed.)
Routledge Handbook of Identity Studies, Chapter 17: 291306. Routledge:
New York.
52 A. Joy and C. Peña
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
Michaud, J. (2010, April). Eighty-Five from the Archive: Rachel Carson. The
New Yorker (online), retrieved from: http://www.newyorker.com/books/dou
ble-take/eighty-ve-from-the-archive-rachel-carson, [accessed on: 01/08/2016].
Morgan, L. R., & Birtwistle, G. (2009). An Investigation of Young Fashion
Consumers Disposal Habits. International Journal of Consumer Studies,
33:190198.
Penton Media. (2011, November 2). Traceability: Tracking from Farm to
Fork. Natural Foods Merchandiser,810.
Poghosyan, A., Gonzalez-Diaz, F., & Bolotova, Y. (2004). Traceability and
Assurance Protocols in the Global Food System. International Food &
Agribusiness Management Review,7(3): 118126.
Pouliot,S.,&Sumner,D.A.(2008).Traceability,Liability,andIncentives
for Food Safety and Quality. AmericanJournalofAgriculturalEconomics,
90(1): 1527.
Ritzer, G. (2011). The McDonaldization of Society 6. Pine Forge Press:
Thousand Oaks, CA.
Robert-Demontrond, P. (2009). Le Label Kasher: perspectives sur la dynami-
que commerciale dun système de traçabilité de produits sain(t)s. Décisions
Marketing, Janvier-Ma,53:1929.
Scaraboto, D., & Fischer, E. (2013). Frustrated Fatshionistas: An Institutional
Theory Perspective on Consumer Quests for Greater Choice in Mainstream
Markets. Journal of Consumer Research,39(6): 12341257.
Specter, M. (2014, August). Seeds of Doubt. The New Yorker (online),
retrieved from: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/08/25/seeds-
of-doubt, [accessed on: 01/08/2016].
Suber, T. (2012). Using Traceability to Protect Supply Chain Integrity. Dairy
Foods,113(6): 76.
Thompson, C. J., & Coskuner-Balli, G. (2007). Countervailing Market
Responses to Corporate Co-optation and the Ideological Recruitment of
Consumption Communities. Journal of Consumer Research,34(2): 135152.
Thompson, C. J., Rindeisch, A., & Arsel, Z. (2006). Emotional Branding and
the Strategic Value of the Doppelgänger Brand Image. Journal of Marketing,
70(1): 5064.
Trawick, P., & Hornborg, A. (2015). Revisiting the Image of the Limited
Good. Current Anthropology,56(1): 127.
Tsakiridou, E., Mattas, K., Tsakiridou, H., & Tsiamparli, E. (2011). Purchasing
Fresh Produce on the Basis of Food Safety, Origin, and Traceability Labels.
Journal of Food Products Marketing,17(2/3): 211226.
3 Sustainability and the Fashion Industry: Conceptualizing ... 53
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
United Nations. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and
Development: Our Common Future. UN Documents: Oslo, Norway.
Warren, K. J. (Ed.) (1994). Ecological feminism: Environmental philosophies.
Routledge: London, UK.
Welchman, J. (2012). A Defence of Environmental Stewardship.
Environmental Values,21(3): 297316.
World Wildlife Fund. (2016). Cotton: Awater Wasting Crop. World Wide
Fund For Nature (online), retrieved from: http://wwf.panda.org/about_
our_earth/about_freshwater/freshwater_problems/thirsty_crops/cotton/,
[accessed on: 22/09/2016].
Dr. Annamma Joy is a professor of Marketing, Faculty of Management at the
University of British Columbia, Okanagan campus. Her research interests are
primarily in the area of consumer behaviour and branding with a special focus
on luxury brands, fashion brand experiences, consumer behaviour in the
Peoples Republic of China (PRC), sustainability in the fashion and wine
industries, and aesthetic consumption. She has published several articles in
consumer behaviour and marketing journals such as the Journal of Consumer
Research, Journal of Consumer Psychology, International Journal of Research in
Marketing, Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, and Journal of Economic
Psychology, Consumption, Markets and Culture. Dr. Joy has won several awards
for her articles published in journals in addition to videos she helped produce.
Camilo Peña is a PhD student at the Faculty of ManagementUniversity of
British Columbia (UBC), Okanagan Campus. His current work and research
focuses on topics of sustainable consumer behaviours in the wine industry.
54 A. Joy and C. Peña
camiloandres.pena@gmail.com
View publication stats
... It faces increasingly urgent immense and diverse challenges (Lanfranchi & Cline, 2021;Simpliciano et al., 2023) acknowledged by governments, NGOs, activists, researchers, consumers and the industry itself. Fashion is highly environmentally and socially destructive, in part because of the breadth and scale of its operations, with many other converging factors (Fletcher, 2010;Gabriel, 2023, Jacometti, 2019Joy & Peña, 2017;Kozlowski et al., 2012;Mora et al., 2014;Mukherjee, 2015;Thorisdottir & Johannsdottir, 2019). While accurate data about the fashion sector is challenging to come by, estimates of sector carbon emissions range from 4 to 8.6% of total global emissions (Berg et al., 2020) and are expected to consume 25% of the global carbon budget by 2050 (EMF, 2017). ...
... Achieving a sustainable fashion industry requires shifts from current processes across agriculture, animal welfare, chemicals, oil and gas, and many other intersecting industries as well as shifts within the fashion value and supply chain to better consider water usage, chemical toxicity, human dignity, living wages, and cultural appropriation among other considerations (Fletcher, 2010;Gabriel, 2023, Jacometti, 2019Joy & Peña, 2017;Kozlowski et al., 2012;Mora et al., 2014;Mukherjee, 2015;Thorisdottir & Johannsdottir, 2019). Those necessary shifts require a dynamic awareness of sourcing, production, and distribution activities. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
As consumers and activist organisations press for greater transparency about fashion’s social and environmental impacts and new legislation comes into force requiring accurate environmental, social and governance reporting, fashion businesses are called upon to generate, validate and act on data relating to their sustainability business operations. Responsible business certifications, for example B Corp, require fashion businesses to report across the areas of environment, workers, customers, community and governance. Thus reliable and accessible data is the cornerstone to a transparent global fashion industry and is one of the most important tools for driving transformative change. As Fashion Revolution says: “transparency is foundational to achieving systemic change in the global fashion industry… When brands publicly disclose information, it allows anyone to scrutinise their policies, hold them accountable for their claims and advocate for positive change” (FTI, 2021). The jobs of tomorrow require ‘fluency in sustainability issues and climate science fields’ (Microsoft, 2022). In the era of big data, data literacy has become even more vital for those professionals whose work is reliant on accurate interpretations and projections informed by data and those who design data collection and management systems (Cai & Zhu, 2015; Koltay, 2016). Within fashion the number of roles requiring facility with sustainability has increased massively. But integrating responsible business theory and sustainability literacies into engaging teaching and learning experiences remains a challenge in the shifting landscape of sustainable fashion. For those who are working in industry there is a pressing need to upskill and gain knowledge not only about social and environmental impact but also the most effective ways to ameliorate negative impacts and promote positive impacts. Furthermore, fashion activists and policy makers require accurate, reliable and accessible empirical data at local, regional, national and international levels against which to benchmark fashion industry actions. Whilst the scope and scale of the global fashion industry makes measuring sustainability and impact efforts challenging there is growing pressure from various stakeholders to provide just this information. But many fashion business professionals find themselves at a loss amidst a sea of information, misinformation, myths and greenwash. It is against this backdrop that Glasgow Caledonian University, the University for the Common Good initiated an innovative and unprecedented partnership between academics, industry and fashion activists. This paper shares the motivations, intentions, operations and outcomes of the first Data for Sustainable Fashion Certificate course developed by Glasgow Caledonian New York College (GCNYC) and Fashion Revolution USA bringing sustainability experts across academia, activism and industry together and which first ran as an online synchronous delivery in Winter 2022. The paper explores how the team co-designed a 3-part course to deliver impactful, interactive sessions for current fashion professionals working in a variety of functions across Europe, Asia and North America. Our collaborative classroom provided a rich and vibrant space a community of practice (Wenger, 1998) within which sustainable fashion advocates could investigate and interrogate the sustainable fashion landscape, developing data literacy and understandings as to data’s use in supporting policy development as well as designing powerful internal and external data-rich communications that can help move the needle on sustainability in their own areas of work. 2023 was the ten-year anniversary of the Rana Plaza industrial homicide which led to the founding of Fashion Revolution. Since 2017, Fashion Revolution has published the Fashion Transparency Index (FTI) ranking the world’s biggest fashion brands on their ‘public disclosure of human rights and environmental policies, practices and impacts, in their operations and supply chains’. The 2022 FTI scored 250 businesses, in 246 categories across five weighted areas: Policies and Commitments, Governance, Traceability, Know Show & Fix and Spotlight Issues (Fashion Revolution, 2022). 2023 also sees the clock ticking towards the 2030 deadline set by the United Nations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (UN). Fashion relates to several of the Goals, primarily SDG 4 (quality education), SDG 5 (gender), SDG 8 (decent work), SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production) and SDG (climate action). Sustainability expands the need for different data since beneath each of the SDGs sits a number of targets requiring collection and collation of data. As such frameworks such as the Fashion Transparency Index provide an invaluable resource reflecting the multitude of impacts generated by the world’s largest fashion brands. By allowing students to explore the variety of data sources and their various methodologies, including those of the FTI, we can empower our students and fashion professionals to lead the necessary changes we individually and collectively wish to see in the fashion industry. The authors invited students to write reflective pieces which highlight the transformational impact of engaging with the course. These and testimonials will be presented and discussed during the presentation as well as the key takeaways from the partners who developed this innovative executive education course, including how to build effective partnerships between academia, industry and activist organisations as well as the circular relationship between data and policy. The approach taken can provide a roadmap for other educators seeking to implement change in their teaching of sustainable fashion.
... Lastly, another product-related factor influencing the choice of sustainable products is information about ethical sourcing. Consumers increasingly demand transparency from fashion brands about their supply chains, production processes, and material sourcing, seeking assurance that sustainable claims are supported by credible certifications or verified information (Joy & Peña, 2017). ...
Chapter
Despite the textile, fashion and apparel sector is one of the most polluting industries, a new innovative practice, the reuse of fish leather, can be considered a highly eco-sustainable process. Its production not only avoids animal hunting, as it is based exclusively on recycled material, but also involves a much lower cost and also guarantees greater versatility and resistance compared to other type of leather of animal origin. The present study aims to investigate the consumers’ propensity to purchase such fashion products still considered unusual. Through a structural equations model, the influence of consumers’ attitudes, subjective norms, environmental concern, their perceived effectiveness on environmental health, and fashion innovativeness on the intention to buy them is studied, also considering when they are proposed as Made in Italy or haute couture clothes.
... Traceability systems, exemplified by Bumble Bee Foods in the food industry, are crucial for ensuring product safety and sustainability, especially in the challenged seafood sector, enhancing brand reputation and consumer trust [13]. In the fashion industry, traceability systems, like the one by Levi Strauss & Co., allow consumers to track jeans' origin and production, contributing to the company's recent success and developing a brand reputation for sustainable responsibility [14]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Amid growing environmental apprehensions, an increasing consumer demographic actively pursues genuine and transparent information traceability, aiming to bolster their commitment to sustainable practices. This study aims to investigate how consumer preferences for traceability, sustainability, and sustainable brand reputation of products influence the optimal decisions and selling quantity strategies adopted by firms operating in heterogeneous smart sustainable supply chains (SSCs). Utilizing both centralized and decentralized scenarios, this research constructs differentiated duopoly models, classifying participating entities as either boundedly rational or naive. Applying a differential game approach for an infinite time horizon, the study assesses the entities’ steady optimal decisions as well as the performances of the sustainable product across two scenarios. A cournot duopoly game is employed to examine the selling quantity strategies of differentiated smart SSCs. We leverage various tools for numerical simulations, including 1-D bifurcation diagrams, the largest Lyapunov exponent (LLE), phase diagrams, and basins of attraction. The outcomes of our investigation underscore the substantial influence of consumer preferences for sustainability and traceability on the transparency of information related to sustainable products. This influence reverberates across manufacturers and suppliers, where brand reputation emerges as a pivotal factor in shaping decision-making processes. Our study meticulously examines the repercussions of the profit-sharing ratio and the adjustment speed of boundedly rational entities.
... The economy defines the power and development of society while society is the space where politics and economy play a pivotal role. 33 Talking about fashion as a lifestyle that is an expressive art of both political and economic status quo then becomes not a miraculous wonder at all given the understanding of the existential triad. As human beings exist within space and time, the change of time as history unfolds influences both the political and economic aspects of society. ...
Article
Full-text available
The common trend of fashion is that it comes and goes as history changes and human development advances. However, as humans develop and are supposed to be progressing, sometimes in terms of fashion they also retrogress. The assumption is that language used by advertisers and designers influences people to revisit history. The purpose of this study was to argue that the work of art never expires as it gets repackaged, remodelled and modified over the ages. Some works and designs of art used in a particular period of history may have become obsolete, but the use of a language in a future epoch may bring them back to popularity. In this conceptual qualitative study, literature from both online and offline was used in making the case that art develops with the use of language than perishing. Within this desktop conceptual study, it was found that the language of advertisement is crucial in portraying fashion because language use can revive fashion. The power of language creates a hunt and frenzy to wear clothes of the 1500s calling them ‘vintage’. Using an analytic theoretic framework, this paper investigated the linguistic power and its influence on different epochs. This study specifically argued for the necessary merger between art and linguistics as that would be beneficial in creating classical fashion trends. The recommendation thereof was that teachers of art must work together with language specialists and incorporate both value and language in advertisements. This study posits that language has much power to influence the economy, culture, fashion, and even lifestyle of many people across generations. Keywords: Fashion Fads, Language Potency, Vintage, Economic Language, Fashion Resurgence
... European haute couture (or high-end fashion) products have a worldwide reputation and accounted for 10% of total EU exports in 2019 (European Commission, 2020a). Despite the significant economic contributions made by the fashion industry, it remains one of the most polluting industries after oil (Joy and Peña, 2017). In Europe, sustainability awareness is growing at multiple levels from customers, designers, producers, governments, and NGOs. ...
... The application of traceability systems in the food industry, such as that used by Bumble Bee Foods 6 , has become important in ensuring product safety and sustainability, particularly in the seafood industry which has been challenged with over-fishing and unethical practices and has helped to improve the company's brand reputation and consumer trust (Rana, 2020). Traceability systems have been introduced in the fashion industry, such as the one implemented by Levi Strauss & Co, enabling consumers to track the origin and production process of their jeans, contributing to the company's success in recent years and establishing a reputation for environmental and social responsibility (Joy & Peña, 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
In the face of escalating environmental concerns, an expanding consumer base actively seeks authentic and transparent information traceability to reinforce their dedication to sustainable practices. This research aims to examine the impact of consumer preferences for product traceability, environmental sustainability, and brand on the optimal decisions and pricing strategies of firms within heterogeneous smart sustainable supply chains (SSCs). Employing both centralized and decentralized scenarios, the study develops differentiated triopoly models in which the participating players are categorized as boundedly rational, naive, and adaptive. Utilizing a differential game approach, the research analyzes the optimal decisions of entities and the performance of products under various scenarios. Subsequently, a Bertrand triopoly game is employed to scrutinize the pricing strategies of differentiated SSCs. The findings underscore the substantial influence of consumer sustainability and traceability preferences on information transparency for sustainable products, impacting both manufacturers and suppliers, while brand reputation positively shapes decision-making. The study reveals intricate effects of these preferences on the adjustment speed of boundedly rational supply chains, directly influencing market stability.
Article
Sustainability is the result of modern-day design philosophy as a result of major industrial developments and many conflicts and wars. This concept is what prompted this research to focus on the possibility of achieving the principles of sustainability practically - in field reality - through the use of artificial intelligence techniques to create contemporary designs derived from the Saudi Asiri heritage and employ them in printing sustainable clothing supplements. Heritage-inspired design has cultural meaning and importance, and its purpose is to transmit our heritage to our emerging generations, and therefore it is considered a type of sustainable thought. The Asir region in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has a rich heritage that is greatly influenced by the charming nature of the place. The Asir region is distinguished by the art of the “Asiri Cat,” which consists of engravings, lines, and aesthetic formations engraved by women specialized in this field. They inherited this art from the women who preceded them. Asiri art is distinguished from other arts. The use of bright natural colors such as blue, green, orange, black and white, as the Asir region is considered one of the important heritage and tourist areas within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, has played a pivotal role in enriching the cultural and creative stock not only of the Saudi citizen, but also of the Arabian Gulf region. This is what prompted us in the current research to delve into the analysis of the creative and artistic aspects of Asiri art inscriptions and to benefit from the aesthetic values of Asiri art decorations in contemporary artistic designs that achieve sustainability for the purpose of exploiting them in the manufacture of plastic fittings for clothing supplements to serve small industries. Many diverse designs have been implemented using different printing techniques. From (direct drawing method - stencil printing - pictorial screen printing) the use of different types and colors to implement different products to produce clothing accessories that are closely related to the structure of form and content of Al-Qat Al-Asiri art, and depends on its aesthetic philosophy about the heritage and cultural references associated with the place and the artist’s own vision. To revive Saudi heritage. The research aims to take advantage of the geometric and floral decorative elements in Al-Qat Al-Asiri’s artistic engravings as a source for enriching and sustaining printed designs for women’s clothing supplements that are characterized by authenticity and contemporaryness, and preserving popular motifs by reformulating them. In keeping with the times, and preserving its most prominent features, in a way that enhances belonging and preserves the community’s heritage and values. From extinction, endless horizons of creativity and innovation have been achieved in the field of printing clothing supplements, and sustainable plastic repetition, which the designer or art practitioner resorts to in general, and the field of printing in particular, as a creative pluralistic plastic method.The research followed the descriptive and analytical approach in identifying the origins and characteristics of the Asir artistic inscriptions (the cat), analyzing their vocabulary, reformulating them, and drawing inspiration from them to enrich the printed designs of women’s clothing supplements, in addition to the experimental approach in the applied study through the use of different techniques and materials. The results of the study concluded that there are various aesthetic values in the Asiri cat engraving that can be used to create contemporary designs on clothing accessories using different printing techniques, in order to preserve the Asiri heritage in the southern region of the country. The study recommended the need to pay attention to studying heritage and the arts it contains because of its great importance, as it stimulates appreciation of traditional art and preserves it.
Article
This article stems from a doctoral research focused on fashion consumption through digital media and virtual platforms in Argentina during 2016–21, and its findings have revealed that a considerable proportion of the fashion-consuming population is changing their consumption habits, adopting innovative practices for reasons that extend beyond the mere acquisition of second-hand garments or sustainable brands. This article will glimpse at some of these ingenious and market-resistant practices, which have mainly been adopted in the virtual world. Such practices not only promote greater awareness about the pollution generated by the fashion industry and about the precarious work of some large fast fashion companies but also encourage swapping experiences and the implementation of recycling practices, as well as other sustainable actions such as mending, repairing and intervening on pre-loved and pre-used clothes.
Article
Full-text available
Sustainable Fashion and Textiles: Design Journeys brings together for the first time information about lifecycle sustainability impacts of fashion and textiles, practical alternatives, design concepts and social innovation. It challenges existing ideas about the scope and potential of sustainability issues in fashion and textiles, and sets out a more pluralistic, engaging and forward-looking picture, drawing on ideas of systems thinking, human needs, local products, slow fashion and participatory design, as well as knowledge of materials. The book not only defines the field, it also challenges it, and uses design ideas to help shape more sustainable products and promote social change. Arranged in two sections, the first four chapters represent key stages of the lifecycle: material cultivation/extraction, production, use and disposal. The remaining four chapters explore design approaches for altering the scale and nature of consumption, including service design, localism, speed and user involvement. While each of these chapters is complete in and of itself, their real value comes from what they represent together: innovative ways of thinking about textiles and garments based on sustainability values and an interconnected approach to design.
Book
"An important, controversial account ... of the way in which man's use of poisons to control insect pests and unwanted vegetation is changing the balance of nature." Booklist.
Article
To what extent are our most romantic moments determined by the portrayal of love in film and on TV? Is a walk on a moonlit beach a moment of perfect romance or simply a simulation of the familiar ideal seen again and again on billboards and movie screens? In her unique study of American love in the twentieth century, Eva Illouz unravels the mass of images that define our ideas of love and romance, revealing that the experience of 'true' love is deeply embedded in the experience of consumer capitalism. Illouz studies how individual conceptions of love overlap with the world of cliches and images she calls the 'Romantic Utopia'. This utopia lives in the collective imagination of the nation and is built on images that unite amorous and economic activities in the rituals of dating, lovemaking, and marriage. Since the early 1900s, advertisers have tied the purchase of beauty products, sports cars, diet drinks, and snack foods to success in love and happiness. Illouz reveals that, ultimately, every cliche of romance - from an intimate dinner to a dozen red roses - is constructed by advertising and media images that preach a democratic ethos of consumption: material goods and happiness are available to all. Engaging and witty, Illouz's study begins with readings of ads, songs, films, and other public representations of romance and concludes with individual interviews in order to analyze the ways in which mass messages are internalized. Combining extensive historical research, interviews, and postmodern social theory, Illouz brings an impressive scholarship to her fascinating portrait of love in America.
Article
Modern management theory is constricted by a fractured epistemology. which separates humanity from nature and truth from morality. Reintegration is necessary if organizational science is to support ecologically and socially sustainable development. This article posits requisites of such development and rejects the paradigms of conventional technocentrism and antithetical ecocentrism on grounds of incongruence. A more fruitful integrative paradigm of “sustaincentrism” is then articulated, and implications for organizational science are generated as if sustainability, extended community, and our Academy mattered.
Article
Going green has seeped into the nation’s consumer consciousness. And while some industries have received more attention than others, research has shown that even for consumers with knowledge of environmental impacts resulting from apparel production and manufacture, purchasing green over conventional apparel has not historically been a concern for many consumers. This paper theorizes that the outdoor apparel industry, with their history of championing environmental conservation efforts can serve as an industry leader by implementing product sustainability efforts across their supply chain to influence other apparel brands and actors within the textile supply chain to employ greener practices. This paper explores that question by researching (1) the potential of whether the outdoor recreationalist, the main consumer of outdoor brands’ products, will be receptive to purchasing green apparel and the potential for a higher price tag, (2) environmental impacts associated with apparel life cycle, (3) product sustainability best practices as advocated by industry trade associations, and (4) a benchmark of product sustainability practices implemented by several outdoor brands as identified by publicly available literature. A review of the environmental impacts associated with apparel across the entire product life cycle revealed that impacts from the production and processing and apparel consumer use stage dwarf those of transportation and product end-of-life. An additional comparison of environmental impacts from specific fiber types revealed that wool was the most sustainable fiber among those examined. Lastly, the review of apparel product sustainability practices found, at an approximate result of two to one, that the majority of outdoor brands did not exhibit or at least advertise their efforts for production of sustainable apparel and that only five (5) of the fourteen (14) brands reviewed publicly exhibited a comprehensive sustainability strategy. However, the study did reveal some brands that exhibited best practices for implementation of sustainable apparel measures and that these brands through their actions were already serving as advocates within the broader apparel industry for adoption of product sustainability measures.
Chapter
This chapter analyses how micro-organizations operating in the UK’s slow-fashion industry communicate online with their target audiences and promote sustainability utilising the RACE Framework. It focuses on the challenges these companies are facing, as well as aspects these organizations are handling well within their online communication. Furthermore, it outlines current events, issues, and challenges faced in the slow-fashion industry before presenting a brief literature review on online communication. A case study approach provides the basis for analysis by following and extending the RACE Framework. The concluding remarks highlight key implications and highlights potential areas of further study.