ChapterPDF Available

Abstract and Figures

When confronted with a problem, have you ever stopped and asked “why” five times? The Five Whys technique is a simple but powerful way to troubleshoot problems by exploring cause-and-effect relationships.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Proposition 32
The Five Whys Technique
In a Word When confronted with a problem, have you ever stopped and asked
whyve times? The Five Whys technique is a simple but powerful way to
troubleshoot problems by exploring cause-and-effect relationships.
For every effect there is a cause. But the results chain between the two is fairly long
and becomes ner as one moves from inputs to activities, outputs, outcome, and
In results-based management,
the degree of control one enjoys decreases
Inputs, activities, and outputs are within the direct control of an intervention's management. An
outcome is what an intervention can be expected to achieve and be accountable for. An impact is
what an intervention is expected to contribute to.
Results-based management is a life-cycle management philosophy and approach that emphasizes
results in integrated planning, implementing, monitoring, reporting, learning, and changing.
Demonstrating results is important for credibility, accountability, and continuous learning, and to
inform decision-making and resource allocation.
©Asian Development Bank 2017
O. Serrat, Knowledge Solutions, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_32
higher up the chain and the challenge of monitoring and evaluating correspondingly
In due course, when a problem appears, the temptation is strong to blame
others or external events. Yet, the root cause of problems often lies closer
to home.
For Want of a Nail
For want of a nail the shoe is lost;
For want of a shoe the horse is lost;
For want of a horse the rider is lost;
For want of a rider the battle is lost;
For want of a battle the kingdom is lost;
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.
George Herbert
The Five Whys Technique
When looking to solve a problem, it helps to begin at the end result, reect on what
caused that, and question the answer ve times.
This elementary and often
effective approach to problem solving promotes deep thinking through questioning,
and can be adapted quickly and applied to most problems.
Most obviously and
directly, the Five Whys technique relates to the principle of systematic
problem-solving: without the intent of the principle, the technique can only be a
shell of the process. Hence, there are three key elements to effective use of the Five
Whys technique: (i) accurate and complete statements of problems,
(ii) complete
honesty in answering the questions, (iii) the determination to get to the bottom of
problems and resolve them. The technique was developed by Sakichi Toyoda for
the Toyota Industries Corporation.
Five is a good rule of thumb. By asking whyve times, one can usually peel away the layers of
symptoms that hide the cause of a problem. But one may also nd one needs to ask whyfewer
times, or conversely more.
Root cause analysis is the generic name of problem-solving techniques. The basic elements of
root causes are materials, equipment, the man-made or natural environment, information, mea-
surement, methods and procedures, people, management, and management systems. Other tools
can be used if the Five Whys technique does not intuitively direct attention to one of these. They
include barrier analysis, change analysis, causal factor tree analysis, and the Ishikawa (or shbone)
By repeating whyve times, the nature of the problem as well as its solution becomes clear.
308 32 The Five Whys Technique
The Five-Whys exercise is vastly improved when applied by a team and there are
ve basic steps to conducting it:
Gather a team and develop the problem statement in agreement. After this is
done, decide whether or not additional individuals are needed to resolve the
Ask the rst whyof the team: why is this or that problem taking place? There
will probably be three or four sensible answers: record them all on a ip chart or
whiteboard, or use index cards taped to a wall.
Ask four more successive whys,repeating the process for every statement on
the ip chart, whiteboard, or index cards. Post each answer near its parent.
Follow up on all plausible answers. You will have identied the root cause when
asking whyyields no further useful information. (If necessary, continue to ask
questions beyond the arbitrary ve layers to get to the root cause.)
Among the dozen or so answers to the last asked whylook for systemic
causes of the problem. Discuss these and settle on the most likely systemic
cause. Follow the team session with a debrieng and show the product to others
to conrm that they see logic in the analysis.
After settling on the most probable root cause of the problem and obtaining
conrmation of the logic behind the analysis, develop appropriate corrective
actions to remove the root cause from the system. The actions can (as the case
demands) be undertaken by others but planning and implementation will benet
from team inputs.
Define the problem:
Why is it happening?
Why is that?
Why is that?
Note: If the last answer is
something you cannot
control, go back to the
previous response.
Why is that?
Why is that?
Fig. Five whys worksheet. Source Author
Process 309
The Five Whys technique has been criticized as too basic a tool to analyze root
causes to the depth required to ensure that the causes are xed. The reasons for this
criticism include:
The tendency of investigators to stop at symptoms, and not proceed to lower
level root causes.
The inability of investigators to cast their minds beyond current information and
Lack of facilitation and support to help investigators ask the right questions.
The low repeat rate of results: different teams using the Five Whys technique
have been known to come up with different causes for the same problem.
Clearly, the Five Whys technique will suffer if it is applied through deduction
only. The process articulated earlier encourages on-the-spot verication of answers
to the current whyquestion before proceeding to the next, and should help avoid
such issues.
Further Reading
ADB (2007) Guidelines for preparing a design and monitoring framework. Manila
The opinions expressed in this chapter are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reect the
views of the Asian Development Bank, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 IGO license (
which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any
medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the Asian Development Bank, provide
a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
Any dispute related to the use of the works of the Asian Development Bank that cannot be
settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the
Asian Development Banks name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of the
Asian Development Banks logo, shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between
the Asian Development Bank and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC-IGO license.
Note that the link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapters Creative
Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not
included in the chapters Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by
statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder.
310 32 The Five Whys Technique
... This process cultivates an informed culture in which management and operators are knowledgeable about factors that influence safety and reliability of systems [278]. A built-in meeting scheduler is used to promote group decision-making processes (see [252]) with templates such as the five-whys root-cause analysis (see [281]) sourced from the KB. ...
Full-text available
Vertical farming (VF) is the practice of growing crops or animals using the vertical dimension via multi-tier racks or vertically inclined surfaces. In this thesis, I focus on the emerging industry of plant-specific VF. Vertical plant farming (VPF) is a promising and relatively novel practice that can be conducted in buildings with environmental control and artificial lighting. However, the nascent sector has experienced challenges in economic viability, standardisation, and environmental sustainability. Practitioners and academics call for a comprehensive financial analysis of VPF, but efforts are stifled by a lack of valid and available data. A review of economic estimation and horticultural software identifies a need for a decision support system (DSS) that facilitates risk-empowered business planning for vertical farmers. This thesis proposes an open-source DSS framework to evaluate business sustainability through financial risk and environmental impact assessments. Data from the literature, alongside lessons learned from industry practitioners, would be centralised in the proposed DSS using imprecise data techniques. These techniques have been applied in engineering but are seldom used in financial forecasting. This could benefit complex sectors which only have scarce data to predict business viability. To begin the execution of the DSS framework, VPF practitioners were interviewed using a mixed-methods approach. Learnings from over 19 shuttered and operational VPF projects provide insights into the barriers inhibiting scalability and identifying risks to form a risk taxonomy. Labour was the most commonly reported top challenge. Therefore, research was conducted to explore lean principles to improve productivity. A probabilistic model representing a spectrum of variables and their associated uncertainty was built according to the DSS framework to evaluate the financial risk for VF projects. This enabled flexible computation without precise production or financial data to improve economic estimation accuracy. The model assessed two VPF cases (one in the UK and another in Japan), demonstrating the first risk and uncertainty quantification of VPF business models in the literature. The results highlighted measures to improve economic viability and the viability of the UK and Japan case. The environmental impact assessment model was developed, allowing VPF operators to evaluate their carbon footprint compared to traditional agriculture using life-cycle assessment. I explore strategies for net-zero carbon production through sensitivity analysis. Renewable energies, especially solar, geothermal, and tidal power, show promise for reducing the carbon emissions of indoor VPF. Results show that renewably-powered VPF can reduce carbon emissions compared to field-based agriculture when considering the land-use change. The drivers for DSS adoption have been researched, showing a pathway of compliance and design thinking to overcome the ‘problem of implementation’ and enable commercialisation. Further work is suggested to standardise VF equipment, collect benchmarking data, and characterise risks. This work will reduce risk and uncertainty and accelerate the sector’s emergence.
... Flip charts and flash cards were used to keep the discussion interactive and focused. Before FDG sessions, an initial qualitative desk review was done by employing the content analysis technique through which CCD scope and response measures were identified and shared with experts for their detailed review and feedback based on well-established technique of situation or problem tree analysis for different climate scenarios for effective decision-making (Wellman, 1983;Hovland, 2005;Borgatti et al., 2009;Dey, 2012;Norris et al., 2012;Serrat, 2017;Iqbal et al., 2022). These are practiced widely for good planning and management cycles through cause and effect analysis which can be easily produced through FGDs (Hovland, 2005). ...
Full-text available
The United Nations SDGs Report 2020 revealed that climatic variability victimized masses across the globe in 2018 and the global average temperature would rise to 3.2°C during this century. The GHG emission reduction targets for 2030 were prioritized under the Paris Climate Agreement (PCA) of 2015 to keep the rise in global temperature below 1.5°C. Here, parallel action for climate adaptation is on top of it. However, targets for both adaptation and mitigation are lagging. Climatic variations will continue more likely with similar trends thus influencing the development needs vis-à-vis environmental security and sustainability of resources. It entails climate compatibility, particularly for the water security agenda for SDG-13 and Paris Climate Agreement (PCA), which requires an inclusive governance regime and ownership for national and sub-national scenarios. In this context, this paper aimed to assess existing water sector governance for climate compatible development (CCD) by taking the case of Pakistan which is among the top 10 countries vulnerable to climate change. Considering the limitations of available methodologies due to the involvement of various aspects and concepts of governance, an integrated multivariate mix-method model was formulated by combining rules and rights-oriented approaches. This MCDA-based model integrates six novel climate governance principles against six basic components of the basic institutional governance framework; Simple Multi-attribute Rating Technique (SMART) with a set of sectoral indicators of 09 criteria of climate compatible development (CCD). It proved well for this water sector case study with cross-sectional data from 340 key informant interviews (KIIs) and 17 focus group discussions (FGDs) in Pakistan, validated statistically. It can be used for periodic sectoral governance assessments for CCD.
Full-text available
The most recognized area where Boolean functions are used in TRIZ is, presumably, the cause-effect analysis, with logical operators indicating how causes trigger the effects. An AND operator denotes logical conjunction, while an OR operator denotes logical disjunction, and both are fully defined functions, i.e., an explicit output value is specified for each combination of the arguments. This paper focuses on partially defined Boolean functions incurring uncertainty due to some output values indicated as unspecified or unknown. It discusses the opportunities and threats of using such functions to describe project requirements and relations between the causes in cause-effect models. The approaches to tackling the uncertainty resulting from such function definitions are also presented, which is deemed to be instrumental for TRIZ researchers and practitioners. Keywords: TRIZ, Cause-Effect Chains Analysis, Root Conflict Analysis, CECA, RCA+, Boolean logic, partially defined function, requirements analysis. PLEASE NOTE THE PRESENTATION FILES ATTACHED.
Full-text available
Width-related defects are a common occurrence in the Hot Strip Mill process which can lead to extra processing, concessions, or scrapping. The detection and Root Cause Analysis of these defects is a largely manual process and is vulnerable to several negative factors including human error, late feedback, and knock-on effects in successive steel strip products. Automated tools which utilize Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for defect detection and Root Cause Analysis in hot rolling have not yet been adopted outside of surface defect detection and roller force optimization. In this paper, we propose an automated tool for the detection and Root Cause Analysis of width-related defects in the hot rolling process which utilizes a combination of expert knowledge and several Machine Learning models. Through this, we aim to increase the scope, and encourage further development, of Machine Learning applications within the Hot Strip Mill process. Both classical algorithms and Computer Vision methods were used for the Machine Learning component of the tool, namely, classification trees and pre-trained convolutional neural networks. The tool is trained and validated using data from an existing hot rolling mill and thus the challenges of collecting and processing real-world legacy data are highlighted and discussed. The Machine Learning models used are shown to perform optimally by validation performance metrics. The tool is found to be suitable for the specified purpose and would be further improved with more training data.
In 2019, program leaders and professors in the university’s educational leadership program noticed a significant decline in enrollment, and state leadership test scores for the program were below the state average. Using the Five Whys protocol and five stages of the design thinking process as identified by IDEO (Brown & Katz, 2019), they set to resolve the issues. The Five Whys protocol is an iterative and formative interrogative technique used to explore cause-and-effect relationships. As noted by Serrat (2017), the primary goal of the technique is to determine the root cause of a problem by repeating the question up to five times. Each response informed the foundation for the next iteration and allowed the group to settle on the root cause of the problem. Then, design thinking was used to provide a solution-based approach to resolving the problems noted. Program leaders began by forming a stakeholder workgroup that included school district leadership development professionals from each of the university’s surrounding districts. Program leaders used district leader input to understand what skills school districts needed in graduates of the university program and considered possible program changes to address the problems noted. The result of the year-long process was a program transformation, with increased enrollment and improved state assessment scores, to a widely accepted and successful master’s degree program that is supported by all districts served by the university.
Involving all interest groups, often called stakeholders, is increasingly recognized as a key part of sustainable natural resource management, promoting acceptability and compliance with management decisions. However, there is the difficulty of how to build trust, integrate diverse knowledge bases and account for varying objectives of different stakeholders. We present insights from a fisheries stakeholder process that used structured decision making and participatory modelling in a workshop series over the course of three years to develop management advice for a northern pike (Esox lucius) meta-population inhibiting brackish lagoons of the southern Baltic Sea in Germany. The stock is co-exploited by commercial and recreational fisheries who are in conflict over space and fish and vary in values. We formed and professionally facilitated a stakeholder group composed of 15 representatives of all main interest groups. The workshops generated a shared vision and seven mutually agreed management objectives that combined aspects of biological, ecological, economic, and social sustainability. To meet objectives, the group identified more than 40 management options, revolving around stock monitoring, control and surveillance, knowledge transfer, harvest regulations, habitat management, predator control and pike stocking. Participatory model building provided forecasts on the impacts of selected management options, allowing to transparently examine trade-offs based on quantitative criteria matched to objectives. The process overall led to stakeholder consensus about multiple management tools that the group recommended to government officials for future management reform. Challenges remain as to the communication of irreducible ecological and social uncertainties associated with quantitative predictions. In this context, cognitive maps about cause-and-effect relationships affecting pike were found useful to integrate knowledge and remind about uncertainties. Our case study shows that stakeholder-inclusive approaches using structured decision making and participatory modelling with professional facilitation are time-and planning-intensive, but can promote common system understanding and development of mutually agreed management advice also in heterogeneous stakeholder groups that are often in severe conflict with each other.
Conference Paper
Finished Goods Inventory waste is a multibillion annual problem for the CPG industry predominately consisting of Stales and Damages. They required a solution with the ability to identify root causes, and proactively make recommendations to site managers (Plant, Warehouse, Distribution, and Mixing Centers) for wastage prevention. Augmented Analytics was used to develop a solution that stitches disparate data, derive key drivers from Historical trends, forecast products under risk for waste and provide targeted recommendation to decision makers. The solution is consumable as a Power-BI dashboard with insights split between Executive Summary, Site Summary, Causal Analysis, and Recommendations. This solution is a one-stop shop, that establishes connected visibility using Descriptive, Diagnostic, and Predictive analytics across various key drivers that are leading to wastage and also, provides prescriptive recommendations to decision-makers for taking actions to reduce waste.
Unlabelled: Professional identity formation (PIF) is a multi-year, complex, social, and intellectual process that culminates in trainees "thinking, acting, and feeling like a doctor." Some of the processes of PIF, particularly the Hidden Curriculum, may result in suboptimal outcomes in student's cognition, including implicit bias and poor clinical decision-making. Many have recognized the importance of reflective writing, particularly metacognition, in undergraduate medical education. However, there are few concrete examples and explanations for fully integrating reflective writing exercises across multiple situations, experiences, and levels of growth. The authors provide conceptual frameworks, concrete curricular structures, and reflective tools used at two medical schools. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01752-9.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.