... Research methodologies are not able to standardise or control factors that may influence a recovery trajectory, such as the mechanism of injury interacting with individual characteristics and physiology (Cancelliere et al., 2016;Davidson et al., 2015;Duhaime & Rindler, 2015;Isokuortti et al., 2016), individuals suffering a variety of impairments (Ellis et al., 2016;Schneider, 2019) and varying behaviour, social and academic demands and compliance to post-SRC advice varying between individuals (Bigler et al., 2015;McCauley et al., 2013;Rosenbaum & Lipton, 2012). Whilst there are studies assessing how long recovery of symptom burden (Asken et al., 2018;Chorney et al., 2017;Collins et al., 1999;Covassin et al., 2012b;Echemendia et al., 2017;Elbin et al., 2011;Guskiewicz et al., 2003;Howell et al., 2018;Macciocchi et al., 1996;McCauley et al., 2013;McCrea et al., 2020;Wang et al., 2018;Zhu et al., 2015) and neurocognitive impairment takes (Covassin et al., 2012b;Elbin et al., 2011;Field et al., 2003;Guskiewicz et al., 2003;Hoffman et al., 2017;Kerr et al., 2016;Patricios et al., 2018;Zhu et al., 2015), only a handful have reassessed at specific time points (Broglio, Macciocchi, & Ferrara, 2007a, 2007bGallagher et al., 2018;Hoffman et al., 2017;McCrea et al., 2003;Resch et al., 2015;Zuckerman et al., 2012). In the aforementioned studies, individuals have reassessed individuals on different days and reported as a singular reassessment time point. ...