- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Population Research and Policy Review
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Interracial Marriage and Self-Reported Health
of Whites and Blacks in the United States
Yan-Liang Yu
1
•Zhenmei Zhang
2
Received: 21 September 2016 / Accepted: 9 May 2017 / Published online: 17 May 2017
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017
Abstract This study examines the self-reported health of 180,291 married non-
Hispanic blacks and whites in interracial versus endogamous marriages. Data are
from the National Health Interview Survey pooled over the period 1997–2013. The
results from ordinal logistic regressions show that non-Hispanic whites intermarried
with non-Hispanic blacks, non-Hispanic whites intermarried with non-Hispanic
other races, and non-Hispanic white women with Hispanic husbands report sig-
nificantly poorer health than their endogamous counterparts. Furthermore, non-
Hispanic whites with non-Hispanic black spouses also fare worse than their inter-
racially married peers with Hispanic spouses. In contrast, the self-reported health of
married non-Hispanic blacks shows no significant difference between the interra-
cially and the endogamously married. Our findings highlight the theoretical sig-
nificance of spousal characteristics and couple-level contexts in the household
production of health.
Keywords Interracial marriage Self-reported health Spousal race Racial pairing
Introduction
Research on marriage and health consistently documents better mental and physical
health, and lower mortality rates, among married people compared to the unmarried
(Rendall et al. 2011; Waite and Gallagher 2000). Much less attention has been given
&Yan-Liang Yu
socrocks.jerry@gmail.com
1
Robert N. Butler Columbia Aging Center, Columbia University, 722 W. 168th Street, 4th Floor
Room 410, New York, NY 10032, USA
2
Department of Sociology, Michigan State University, Berkey Hall, 509 E. Circle Drive Room
316, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
123
Popul Res Policy Rev (2017) 36:851–870
DOI 10.1007/s11113-017-9438-0
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.